International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2000), 50, 1081–1086 Printed in Great Britain Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Thermoactinomyc es based on 16S rDNA sequences Jung-Hoon Yoon and Yong-Ha Park Author for correspondence : Yong-Ha Park. Tel : j82 42 860 4620. Fax : j82 42 860 4625. e-mail : yhpark!kribb4680.kribb.re.kr Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), PO Box 115, Yusong, Taejon, Korea The almost complete 16S rDNA sequences of the type strains of eight validly described species and two invalid species of the genus Thermoactinomyc es were determined and phylogenetically analysed. The validly described Thermoactinomyc es species formed phylogenetic lineages related to the family Bacillaceae, as shown previously. However, the available strains of ‘ Thermoactinomyc es glaucus ’ and ‘ Thermoactinomyc es monosporus ’ exhibited their closest phylogenetic affinities not to the genus Thermoactinomyc es but to the genus Saccharomonospora. Some Thermoactinomyc es species were shown to be closely related from 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Particularly, Thermoactinomyc es vulgaris KCTC 9076T and Thermoactinomyc es candidus KCTC 9557T had the same 16S rDNA sequences and Thermoactinomyc es thalpophilus KCTC 9789T and Thermoactinomyc es sacchari KCTC 9790T showed 16S rDNA similarity value of almost 100 %. From phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA sequences, it is suggested that the genus Thermoactinomyc es should be taxonomically re-evaluated using other useful taxonomic markers. Keywords : Thermoactinomyces species, 16S rDNA sequence, phylogeny INTRODUCTION The genus Thermoactinomyces was one of the earliest known actinomycete taxa that was first proposed with Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, the type species of the genus (Tsiklinsky, 1899). There was no doubt in recognizing Thermoactinomyces species as actinomycetes because of their morphological characteristics of forming aerial and substrate mycelia. However, some studies provided evidence that the genus Thermoactinomyces should no longer be classified within the order Actinomycetales. Thermoactinomyces species produce endospores as shown in bacilli (Cross et al., 1968, 1971 ; Lacey & Vince, 1971) and have lower GjC contents than those of actinomycetes (Lacey & Cross, 1989). 16S rRNA oligonucleotide sequencing revealed that the genus Thermoactinomyces is more closely related to Bacillus species than to actinomycetes (Stackebrandt & Woese, 1981). Park et al. (1993) also showed that the type strain of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris is phylogenetically related to the genus Bacillus based on 5S rRNA sequences. Accordingly, it has been ................................................................................................................................................. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rDNA sequences reported in this paper are AF138732–AF138739, AF139879 and AF139880. proposed that genus Thermoactinomyces should be placed within the family Bacillaceae (Stackebrandt & Woese, 1981 ; Park et al., 1993). Nevertheless, the morphological characteristics of producing aerial and substrate mycelia have led to classification of the genus Thermoactinomyces becoming confused. Thermoactinomyces species are aerobic, Gram-positive and thermotolerant, with the exception of one mesophilic species, Thermoactinomyces peptonophilis (Nonomura & Ohara, 1971). The genus Thermoactinomyces contains meso-diaminopimelic acid but no diagnostic sugars in the cell wall (Lacey & Cross, 1989), indicating that the wall chemotype is type III (Lechevalier & Lechevalier, 1970). Differences in the isoprenoid quinone profile of the genus Thermoactinomyces were seen between the studies of Collins et al. (1982) and Tseng et al. (1990). Collins et al. (1982) showed that this genus has unsaturated menaquinones with seven or nine isoprene units (MK-7 or MK-9) as the predominant menaquinones but Tseng et al. (1990) found unsaturated menaquinones with seven, or eight and nine isoprene units (MK-7 or MK-8 and MK-9) as the predominant menaquinones. The genus Thermoactinomyces has a cellular fatty acid profile containing major amounts of iso- and anteiso-branched fatty 01228 # 2000 IUMS 1081 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16 J.-H. Yoon and Y.-H. Park acids (Kroppenstedt, 1985). The GjC contents of DNA range from 52 to 54n8 mol % (Tm) (Lacey & Cross, 1989). There are currently eight validly described Thermoactinomyces species, namely Thermoactinomyces candidus (Kurup et al., 1975), Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus (Krasil’nikov & Agre, 1964 ; Cross & Goodfellow, 1973), Thermoactinomyces intermedius (Kurup et al., 1980), Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus (Nonomura & Ohara, 1971), Thermoactinomyces putidus (Lacey & Cross, 1989), Thermoactinomyces sacchari (Lacey, 1971), Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus (Waksman & Corke, 1953 ; Unsworth & Cross, 1980) and Thermoactinomyces vulgaris (Tsiklinesky, 1899). Before including the eight valid species, the genus Thermoactinomyces had very confusing taxonomic history (Lacey & Cross, 1989). In addition to the eight valid Thermoactinomyces species, some species, such as ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ (Henssen, 1957), ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ (Waksman & Corke, 1953), ‘ Thermoactinomyces thermophilus ’ (Waksman, 1961), ‘ Thermoactinomyces antibioticus ’ (Craveri et al., 1964) and ‘ Thermoactinomyces albus ’ (Lacey & Cross, 1989), were known but have not been validly described. ‘ Thermoactinomyces antibioticus ’ and ‘ Thermoactinomyces albus ’ were described to be synonyms of Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus and Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, respectively (Lacey & Cross, 1989). Strain(s) of ‘ Thermoactinomyces thermophilus ’ are no longer available from the culture collections. The type strains of ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ are no longer available. However, one strain of ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ and one strain of ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’, which are found in catalogues of some culture collections, were those described by Fergus (1964) and Nonomura & Ohara (1969), respectively. Thermoactinomyces species have also been noticed due to their pathogenicity. They have been implicated as causal agents in various forms of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (extrinsic allergic alveolitis), especially farmer’s lung disease and bagassosis (Pepys et al., 1963 ; Lacey, 1971 ; Lacey & Cross, 1989). Such disease are likely to appear in farmers that have been exposed to mouldy hay and cereal grains in which Thermoactinomyces species are known to be most abundant. However, Thermoactinomyces species are known to be found in a variety of natural sources, such as soil, rivers, dairy products and marine sediments, and even in humidifiers of air-conditioning systems (Lacey & Cross, 1989). Despite confusing taxonomic history and their importance as pathogens, it is surprising that useful taxonomic methods being recently used, such as phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA sequences, have not been applied to the genus Thermoactinomyces. The 16S rRNA sequences of three Thermoactinomyces species, Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, Thermoactinomyces candidus and Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus, were previously determined, 1082 but these sequences, especially 16S rRNA sequence of Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus, may contain many unreadable nucleotides and are therefore of little value. The aim of this study was to examine the 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences as one useful taxonomic marker for systematic study of the genus Thermoactinomyces. These sequences were thought to be very useful for inferring phylogenetic relationships between Thermoactinomyces species as well as between the genus Thermoactinomyces and other related genera. METHODS Bacterial strains. Table 1 summarizes the strains used in this study and the GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rDNA sequences. All strains, except Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus, Thermoactinomyces intermedius, Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus and ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus’, were grown in shake flasks containing CYC broth (Cross & Attwell, 1974). Thermoactinomyces intermedius was grown in shake flasks containing Trypticase Soy Broth and Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus and ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ were grown in broth medium containing 0n1 % yeast extract, 0n1 % beef extract, 0n2 % N-Z amine (type A) and 1 % sucrose (pH 7n3). Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus was grown in broth medium containing 1n5 % starch, 1 % yeast extract and 0n05 % MgSO in tap water (pH 7n6). All strains, except Thermoactinomyces% peptonophilus, were grown at suitable temperatures between 45 and 55 mC. Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus was grown at 35 mC. The broth cultures were checked for purity before they were harvested by centrifugation. Chromosomal DNA isolation. Chromosomal DNAs were isolated by the method described previously (Yoon et al., 1996). 16S rDNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. 16S rDNA sequencing was performed as described previously (Yoon et al., 1998). However, forward primer 373F (5h-AATGGGCGCAAGCCTGAT-3h ; positions 373–390 in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA numbering) was replaced by reverse primer 704R (5h-TCTRCGNATTTCACCNCTAC-3h ; positions 704 to 685 in E. coli 16S rRNA numbering). In some cases sequencing reactions were performed with dITP from the DNA sequencing kit (Amersham) or the SequiTherm EXCEL II DNA sequencing kit (Epicentre Technologies) to relieve compression artefacts. The 16S rDNA sequences determined were aligned with 16S rRNA gene sequences of other strains by using software (Thompson et al., 1994). Reference sequences were obtained from the GenBank database with the following accession numbers : X67148 (Atopobium minutum NCFB 2751T), X60640 (Bacillus stearothermophilus NCDO 1768T), X60646 (Bacillus subtilis NCDO 1769T), V00348 (E. coli), AB007908 (Lactobacillus delbrueckii JCM 1002T), M58837 (Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19435T), X60632 (Paenibacillus polymyxa NCDO 1774T), Z38003 (Saccharomonospora glauca DSM 43769T), Z38007 (Saccharomonospora viridis NCIMB 9602T), AB002521 (Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 12344T) and AF002262 (Thermomonospora curvata JCM 3096T). Gaps at the 5h and 3h ends of the alignment were omitted from further analysis. Evolutionary-distance matrices were calculated by using the algorithm of Jukes & Cantor (1969) with the program within the package (Felsenstein, 1993). A phylogenetic tree was con- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16 Phylogeny of the genus Thermoactinomyces Table 1. Thermoactinomyces species and strains used in this study and accession numbers of 16S rDNA sequences ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... KCTC, Korean Collection for Type Cultures, Taejon, Korea ; JCM, Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Saitama, Japan ; IFO, Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan ; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA ; CCRC, Culture Collection and Research Center, Taiwan. Species Thermoactinomyces candidus Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus Thermoactinomyces intermedius Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus Thermoactinomyces putidus Thermoactinomyces sacchari Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus Thermoactinomyces vulgaris ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ Strain Accession no. KCTC 9557T KCTC 3667T (lJCM 9688T) KCTC 9646T (lIFO 14230T) KCTC 9740T (lATCC 27302T) KCTC 3666T (lJCM 8091T) KCTC 9790T (lCCRC 13341T) KCTC 9789T (lCCRC 12549T) KCTC 9076T KCTC 9645 (lIFO 12530) KCTC 3673 (lIFO 14050) structed by using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987) as implemented within the program of the package. The stability of relationships was assessed by a bootstrap analysis of 1000 data sets by using the programs , , and of the package. RESULTS Almost complete 16S rDNA sequences of 10 species attributed to the genus Thermoactinomyces were determined. The 16S rDNAs were amplified by PCR and non-phosphorylated strands of PCR products, whose 5h-phosphorylated strands were selectively digested by λ exonuclease, were used as templates for sequencing. The 16S rDNA sequences determined in this study correspond to the region between positions 28 and 1524 by comparison with E. coli 16S rRNA. The levels of 16S rDNA similarity between the type strains of validly described Thermoactinomyces species were very broad, ranging from 90n8 to 100 %. High levels of 16S rDNA similarity were found between some Thermoactinomyces species (Fig. 1). In particular, Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T and Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T shared identical 16S rDNA sequences. The two species were shown to have 22 bp sequence differences and 10 gaps, except ambiguous nucleotides, between their 16S rRNA sequences determined previously. Thermoactinomyces intermedius KCTC 9646T also exhibited relatively high 16S rDNA similarity value of 99n4 % with Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T and Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T. Thermoactinomyces sacchari KCTC 9790T and Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus KCTC 9789T had the same 16S rDNA sequences, except a single position corresponding to one ambiguous nucleotide (C or T) of Thermoactinomyces sacchari KCTC 9790T. Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus KCTC 9740T exhibited the AF138732 AF138733 AF138734 AF138735 AF138736 AF138737 AF138738 AF138739 AF139879 AF139880 lowest levels of 16S rDNA similarity (90n8–91n8 %) with other validly described Thermoactinomyces species. This phylogenetic distinctiveness of Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus KCTC 9740T may have been guessed, considering that Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus KCTC 9740T has some physiological characteristics different from those of other Thermoactinomyces species (Lacey & Cross, 1989). The 16S rDNA sequences of two invalid Thermoactinomyces species, ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673, were also compared with those of other Thermoactinomyces species. ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673 had only a 1 bp sequence difference in their 16S rDNA sequences, but they exhibited very low 16S rDNA similarity values (less than 83 %) with the type strains of validly described Thermoactinomyces species. The phylogenetic analysis showed that ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673 cannot be members of the genus Thermoactinomyces (Fig. 1). ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673 exhibited the highest 16S rDNA similarity values with the genus Saccharomonospora, especially with Saccharomonospora glauca. The 16S rDNAs of ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673 showed only 1 bp and 2 bp sequence differences, respectively, with 16S rDNA of the type strain of Saccharomonospora glauca. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using 16S rDNA\16S rRNA sequences of Thermoactinomyces species determined, the representatives of the family Bacillaceae, some related taxa and some actinomycete species (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic tree showed that the type strains of validly described Thermoactinomyces species form a distinct radiation of the cluster encompassed by the genus Thermoactinomyces (Fig. 1). The tree indicates International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16 1083 J.-H. Yoon and Y.-H. Park ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the positions of Thermoactinomyces species and representatives of some other taxa based on 16S rDNA sequences. The scale bar represents 1 nucleotide substitution per 100 nucleotides. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) greater than 50 % are shown at the branch points. NCDO, National collection of dairy organisms, Reading, UK. that the genus Thermoactinomyces are much more phylogenetically related to the family Bacillaceae than to the actinomycetes, as shown in previous studies (Stackebrandt & Woese, 1981 ; Park et al., 1993). DISCUSSION A phylogenetic study based on 16S rDNA sequences, together with chemotaxonomic and genomic analyses, is one of the most useful methods for inferring the relationships between genera or between species belonging to a genus (Vandamme et al., 1996). However, the genus Thermoactinomyces has scarcely been subjected to these methods and most species belonging to this genus have been characterized by mainly relying on morphological and physiological properties (Lacey & Cross, 1989). Accordingly, 16S rDNA sequences of the type strains of all valid species assigned to 1084 the genus Thermoactinomyces were determined and phylogenetically analysed in the present study. Our data confirmed previous findings that the genus Thermoactinomyces is phylogenetically related not to the actinomycetes but to the family Bacillaceae (Stackebrandt & Woese, 1981 ; Park et al., 1993). This study also showed the interspecific phylogenetic relationships of the genus Thermoactinomyces based on 16S rDNA sequences that were not revealed previously. Some species were found to be closely related by having high levels of 16S rDNA similarity between them, and some species exhibited relatively low levels of 16S rDNA similarity with other Thermoactinomyces species (Fig. 1). Based on the results of 16S rDNA sequence analysis, Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T, Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T and Thermoactinomyces intermedius KCTC 9646T are shown to be International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16 Phylogeny of the genus Thermoactinomyces closely related and, particularly, 16S rDNA sequences of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T and Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T were the same (Fig. 1). Since Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T was distinguished from Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T by differences of some physiological properties, it was proposed as a new species of the genus Thermoactinomyces (Kurup et al., 1975). However, Thermoactinomyces candidus was regarded as a synonym of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Lacey & Cross, 1989) and, therefore, not listed in the manual but the thought has not been accepted. A very close phylogenetic relationship was also found between Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus KCTC 9789T and Thermoactinomyces sacchari KCTC 9790T, which show a 16S rDNA similarity value of almost 100 % (Fig. 1). DNA–DNA relatedness is now recognized as being the most important criterion for defining species in current bacteriology (Wayne et al., 1987 ; Vandamme et al., 1996). The current phylogenetic definition of a species states that strains with approximately 70 % or greater DNA–DNA relatedness are members of the same species (Wayne et al., 1987). From the results of 16S rDNA sequence analysis, DNA–DNA relatedness test is likely to be necessary for determining exact taxonomic relationships between some Thermoactinomyces species. It is apparent that Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus KCTC 3667T and Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus KCTC 9740T need not necessarily be subjected to a DNA–DNA relatedness test, because they show levels of nucleotide similarity that are low enough for them to be placed as distinct species within the genus Thermoactinomyces (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994). Two invalid species, ‘ Thermoactinomyces glaucus ’ KCTC 9645 and ‘ Thermoactinomyces monosporus ’ KCTC 3673, exhibited their closest phylogenetic affinities not to the genus Thermoactinomyces but to the genus Saccharomonospora, especially Saccharomonospora glauca. However, chemotaxonomic characterizations are also necessary to finally confirm the reclassification of the two species to the genus Saccharomonospora, since the genera Thermoactinomyces and Saccharomonospora are different in some chemotaxonomic properties such as predominant menaquinone profile and wall chemotype. The results of the phylogenetic analysis exhibit some correlation with some physiological properties and predominant menaquinone profiles shown in the study of Tseng et al. (1990). The cluster containing Thermoactinomyces vulgaris KCTC 9076T, Thermoactinomyces candidus KCTC 9557T and Thermoactinomyces intermedius KCTC 9646T and the cluster containing Thermoactinomyces putidus KCTC 3666T, Thermoactinomyces sacchari KCTC 9790T and Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus KCTC 9789T show different predominant menaquinone profiles. The type strains of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, Thermoactinomyces candidus and Thermoactinomyces intermedius were shown to contain MK-7 as the predominant menaquinones (Tseng et al., 1990). The type strains of Thermoactinomyces sacchari and Thermoactinomyces thalpophilus were shown to contain MK-8 and MK-9 as the predominant menaquinones (Tseng et al., 1990). The predominant menaquinone profile for the type strain of Thermoactinomyces putidus was not shown but Thermoactinomyces putidus JCM 3213 has MK-8 and MK-9 as the predominant menaquinones (Tseng et al., 1990). However, it should be considered that the study of Collins et al. (1982) showed different menaquinone profiles from those shown in the study of Tseng et al. (1990) for some Thermoactinomyces species. Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus can be distinguished from other Thermoactinomyces species by its morphological property of forming yellow to orange colonies. The predominant menaquinone profile of the type strain of Thermoactinomyces dichotomicus was MK-7 in study of Collins et al. (1982) but was not shown in study of Tseng et al. (1990). The type strain of Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus forms a line of descent distinct from other Thermoactinomyces (Fig. 1). It is mesophilic, unlike other Thermoactinomyces species, and has some physiological properties distinguishable from other Thermoactinomyces species (Lacey & Cross, 1989 ; Nonomura & Ohara, 1971). However, little is known about the chemotaxonomic properties, including the menaquinone profile, of Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus that may be necessary for investigating the taxonomic relationships with other Thermoactinomyces species. From the results of the phylogenetic analysis, together with morphological and physiological properties and predominant menaquinone profiles, it is supposed that the genus Thermoactinomyces may be heterogeneous group containing more than one genus. To solve this question, a comparative taxonomic study using additional phenotypic markers, especially chemotaxonomic markers, should be performed in the genus Thermoactinomyces. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by grants HS2321 from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of the Republic of Korea. We are grateful to Dr Yong Kook Shin for helpful discussion and to Dr Akio Seino for providing Thermoactinomyces peptonophilus. We are also very grateful to CCRC (Culture Collection and Research Center, Taiwan), IFO (Institute for Fermentation, Osaka) and JCM (Japan Collection of Microorganisms) for providing some strains used in this study. REFERENCES Collins, M. D., Mackillop, G. C. & Cross, T. (1982). Menaquinone composition of members of the genus Thermoactinomyces. FEMS Microbiol Lett 13, 151–153. Craveri, R., Coronelli, C., Pagani, H. & Sensi, P. (1964). Thermorubin, a new antibiotic from a thermoactinomycete. Clin Med 71, 511–521. Cross, T. & Attwell, R. W. (1974). Recovery of viable thermoactinomycete endospores from deep mud cores. In Spore International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16 1085 J.-H. Yoon and Y.-H. Park Research, pp. 11–20. Edited by A. N. Barker, G. W. Gould & J. Wolf. London : Academic Press. Cross, T. & Goodfellow, M. (1973). Taxonomy and classification of the actinomycetes. In Actinomycetales : Characteristics and Practical Importance, pp. 11–112. Edited by G. Sykes & F. A. Skinner. London : Academic Press. Cross, T., Walker, P. D. & Gould, G. W. (1968). Thermophilic actinomycetes producing resistant endospores. Nature 220, 352–354. Cross, T., Davies, F. L. & Walker, P. D. (1971). Thermoactinomyces vulgaris. I. Fine structure of the developing endospores. In Spore Research, pp. 175–187. Edited by A. N. Barker, G. W. Gould & J. Wolf. London : Academic Press. Felsenstein, J. (1993). : Phylogenetic Inference Package, version 3.5. Seattle, WA : University of Washington. Fergus, C. L. (1964). Thermophilic and thermotolerant molds and actinomycetes of mushroom compost during peak heating. Mycologia 56, 267–284. Henssen, A. (1957). Beitra$ ge zur morphologie und systematik der thermophilen actinomyceten. Arch Mikrobiol 26, 373–414. Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. (1969). Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, vol. 3, pp. 21–132. Edited by H. N. Munro. New York : Academic Press. Krasil’nikov, N. A. & Agre, N. S. (1964). A new actinomycetes genus-Actinobifida n. gen. yellow group-Actinobifida dichotomica n. sp. Mikrobiologiya 33, 935–943 (in Russian). Kroppenstedt, R. M. (1985). Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms. In Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics, pp. 173–199. Edited by M. Goodfellow & D. E. Minnikin. London : Academic Press. Kurup, V. P., Barboriak, J. J., Fink, J. N. & Lechevalier, M. P. (1975). Thermoactinomyces candidus, a new species of thermo- philic actinomyces. Int J Syst Bacteriol 25, 150–154. Kurup, V. P., Hollick, G. E. & Pagan E. F. (1980). Thermo- actinomyces intermedius, a new species of amylase negative thermophilic actinomyctes. Science-Ciencia 7, 104–108. Lacey, J. (1971). Thermoactinomyces sacchari sp. nov., a thermophilic actinomycete causing bagassosis. J Gen Microbiol 66, 327–338. Lacey, J. & Cross, T. (1989). Genus Thermoactinomyces Tsiklinsky 1899, 501AL. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 4, pp. 2574–2585. Edited by S. T. Williams, M. E. Sharpe & J. G. Holt. Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins. Lacey, J. & Vince, D. A. (1971). Endospore formation and germination in a new Thermoactinomyces species. In Spore Research, pp. 181–187. Edited by A. N. Barker, G. W. Gould & J. Wolf. London : Academic Press. Lechevalier, M. P. & Lechevalier, H. A. (1970). A critical evaluation of the genera of aerobic actinomycetes. In The Actinomycetales, pp. 393–405. Edited by H. Prauser. Jena : Gustav Fischer Verlag. Nonomura, H. & Ohara, Y. (1969). Distribution of actinomycetes in soil. VII. A culture method effective for both preferential isolation and enumeration of Microbispora and Streptosporangium strains in soil. Part 2. Classification of the isolates. J Ferment Technol 47, 701–709. 1086 Nonomura, H. & Ohara, Y. (1971). Distribution of actinomycetes in soil. X. New genus and species of monosporic actinomycetes in soil. J Ferment Technol 49, 895–903. Park, Y.-H., Kim, E., Yim, D.-G., Kho, Y.-H., Mheen, T.-I. & Goodfellow, M. (1993). Supragenic classification of Thermo- actinomyces vulgaris by nucleotide sequencing of 5S ribosomal RNA. Zentbl Bakteriol 278, 469–478. Pepys, J., Jenkins, P. A., Festenstein, G. N., Gregory, P. H., Lacey, M. E. & Skinner, F. A. (1963). Farmer’s lung : thermophilic actinomycetes as a source of ‘ farmer’s lung hay ’ antigen. Lancet 2, 607–611. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method : a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425. Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note : a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846–849. Stackebrandt, E. & Woese, C. R. (1981). Towards a phylogeny of the actinomycetes and related oganisms. Curr Microbiol 5, 197–202. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). : improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680. Tseng, M., Kudo, T. & Seino, A. (1990). Identification of thermophilic actinomycetes isolated from mushroom compost in Taiwan. Bull JFCC 6, 6–13. Tsiklinsky, P. (1899). On the thermophilic moulds. Ann Inst Pasteur 13, 500–505 (in French). Unsworth, B. A. & Cross, T. (1980). Thermophilic actinomycetes implicated in farmer’s lung : numerical taxonomy of Thermoactinomyces species. In Microbiological Classification and Identification, pp. 389–390. Edited by M. Goodfellow & R. G. Broad. London : Academic Press. Vandamme, P., Pot, B., Gillis, M., De Vos, P., Kersters, K. & Swings, J. (1996). Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev 60, 407–438. Waksman, S. A. (1961). The Actinomycetes : Classification, Identification and Descriptions of Genera and Species, vol. 2. Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins. Waksman, S. A. & Corke, C. T. (1953). Thermoactinomyces Tsiklinsky, a genus of thermophilic actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 66, 377–378. Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R. & 9 other authors (1987). Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464. Yoon, J.-H., Kim, H., Kim, S.-B., Kim, H.-J., Kim, W. Y., Lee, S. T., Goodfellow, M. & Park, Y.-H. (1996). Identification of Saccharo- monospora strains by the use of genomic DNA fragments and rRNA gene probes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46, 502–505. Yoon, J.-H., Lee, S. T. & Park, Y.-H. (1998). Inter- and intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardioides and related taxa based on 16S rDNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 187–194. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:34:16
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz