Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental and Experimental Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envexpbot Leaf gas exchange responses to abrupt changes in light intensity for two invasive and two non-invasive C4 grass species Andrea Mojzes a,b,∗ , Tibor Kalapos a a b Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s. 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Alkotmány u. 2-4, H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 1 October 2007 Received in revised form 10 June 2008 Accepted 12 June 2008 Keywords: Bothriochloa ischaemum Chrysopogon gryllus Cynodon dactylon Photosynthetic induction Sorghum halepense Water use efficiency a b s t r a c t Transient and steady state responses of leaf gas exchange (photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs )) to marked changes in photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) were studied for two invasive [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] and two non-invasive, native [Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng and Chrysopogon gryllus (Torn.) Trin.] perennial C4 grass species from semiarid temperate grasslands or croplands. Following an abrupt drop in PPFD from 1300 to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 , the two invasive species reduced gs to a greater extent than A, resulting in higher intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (PWUE = A/gs ) at low, compared to high-light conditions. For non-invasives, a comparable drop in gs and A led to invariant PWUE, which was lower than that for the invasive group under low light. The duration and speed of stomatal closure was similar for the four species. However, unlike the other grasses, the noxious weed S. halepense exhibited a negligible net loss in PWUE during the high-to-low light transition. Responses of the native B. ischaemum were mostly intermediate between those of the two invasive species and the non-invasive C. gryllus, which is in agreement with the species’ ecological intermediacy: non-invasive but often reaches local dominance following a disturbance. With a sudden reverse change in PPFD photosynthetic light induction was not faster for invasives than for non-invasives. These results indicate more efficient water use under variable light for invasive compared to non-invasive perennial C4 grasses which may contribute to their success in semiarid temperate habitats with a heterogeneous light regime. Yet, rapid photosynthetic light induction appears to be of less importance in such environments. © 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. 1. Introduction Stomata regulate CO2 and water vapor exchange between the leaf interior and the outside atmosphere in such a way that CO2 Abbreviations: A, net photosynthetic rate; Ci , mesophyll air space CO2 partial pressure; costPWUE , water cost integrated over the high-to-low PPFD transient; gs , stomatal conductance to water vapor; PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density; PWUE, intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (A/gs ); PWUE270 and PWUE1300 , steady state PWUE at 270 and 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, respectively; sA/Ci , magnitude of stomatal limitation during photosynthetic light induction; tAdrop and tgdrop , duration of continuous decline of A and gs in response to drop in PPFD, respectively; tArise and tgrise , time needed for photosynthetic induction and stomatal opening following PPFD increase, respectively; tlag close , time lag of stomatal closure behind the decline of A; tlag open , time lag of stomatal opening behind the increase of A; gdrop , speed of stomatal closure; A, relative amplitude of photosynthetic response; gs , relative amplitude of stomatal response. ∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s. 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary. Tel.: +36 1 381 2187; fax: +36 1 381 2188. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Mojzes). 0098-8472/$ – see front matter © 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.06.003 is supplied for photosynthesis at a minimum associated water loss (Nobel, 1983, pp. 448–454; Jones, 1992, pp. 285–292). Under variable conditions, an efficient optimization can be achieved if stomata respond sensitively to signals both within the plant and from the environment. Among environmental factors, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) is particularly subject to rapid and marked fluctuation in the field, e.g. due to variable cloud cover or canopy movements caused by wind (Pearcy et al., 1996). Plant species differ in their capacity as to how closely their leaf gas exchange is able to follow fluctuations in light environment. In different environments, natural selection may have favored different strategies even within herbaceous plants (Knapp and Smith, 1987; Knapp, 1993; Ögren and Sundin, 1996). It is well documented that plants kept in darkness or under low light intensity for hours and then transferred to high (saturating) light intensity require a period of time to reach their steady state photosynthetic rate (Pearcy et al., 1996). Compared to C3 plants, in C4 species such photosynthetic light induction includes additional biochemical components: the activation of C4 cycle enzymes (e.g. PEP carboxylase, pyruvate Pi -dikinase) and the A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 buildup of the high-energy metabolite pool supporting transport of substances between the mesophyll and the bundle sheath (Furbank and Walker, 1985; Horton and Neufeld, 1998; Sage and McKown, 2006). Sage and McKown (2006) argue that C4 plants are less efficient in utilizing short sunflecks in light-limited environments if compared to C3 plants due to structural and functional constraints associated with C4 photosynthesis. Rapid stomatal opening or the maintenance of high stomatal conductance in periods between sunflecks may play an important role in exploiting subsequent sunflecks (Kirschbaum and Pearcy, 1988; Tinoco-Ojanguren and Pearcy, 1992; Ögren and Sundin, 1996). However, in high-light environments where water is often in short supply, such as in semiarid grasslands, rapid closure of stomata with sudden decline in irradiance helps to improve water use efficiency, although at the expense of certain loss in carbon gain. The dumb-bell-shaped stomata of grasses (Poaceae) possess higher capacity to track environmental changes at lower cost than the kidney-shaped stomata of other vascular plants (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). For grass species dominating such open habitats numerous studies have investigated the response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to water stress (e.g. Stuart et al., 1985; Williams and Black, 1994; Kalapos et al., 1996; Pugnaire and Haase, 1996; Awada et al., 2002; Morse et al., 2002; Colom and Vazzana, 2003; Guenni et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2006), but only a few have addressed the response to changes in the light environment (Knapp, 1993; Fay and Knapp, 1993, 1995; Dias-Filho, 2002). In the variable light environment of the tallgrass prairie Knapp (1993) reported light response of stomata to be faster and of smaller amplitude for C4 grasses than for C3 grasses, and interpreted that as an important determinant of the success of C4 species in environments with periodic water limitation. Invasive species often rapidly colonize disturbed habitats where canopy is discontinuous (Holm et al., 1977; Zólyomi and Fekete, 1994; Grace et al., 2001; Hamerlynck, 2001). Such species are expected to face higher degree of environmental heterogeneity including more variable light climate than non-invasive species. This may require a rapid and efficient response of physiological processes to the environment, and thus limitation of these processes by the environment could be minimized. For example, Hamerlynck (2001) attributed an important role to close stomatal tracking of variable irradiance in the invasive C3 tree Ailanthus altissima in its highly successful establishment in urban habitats. C4 species are often weeds in semiarid temperate regions, and are rarely successful in closed vegetation dominated by C3 plants (Long, 1983; Sage and Monson, 1999, pp. 313–373). In this study, we investigated whether stomatal regulation is faster and more efficient in invasive compared to non-invasive C4 grasses. Two hypotheses were tested. (1) When PPFD decreases abruptly, invasive C4 grasses are more efficient in water saving than non-invasive ones during the transient phase and/or in the new steady state under low light. (2) When PPFD reaches a high level again following a steady state in low light, invasive C4 grasses obtain higher carbon gain than non-invasive relatives through more rapid photosynthetic induction. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Species studied, sampling and growth conditions We studied two invasive alien and two non-invasive, native perennial C4 grass species typical of semiarid temperate foreststeppe vegetation or in replacing croplands in Hungary. The invasive species were Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., both ranked among the most serious weeds of the world (Holm et al., 1977, pp. 25–61). S. halepense is a major weed of tall dense crops like corn or sugarcane. C. dactylon also inhab- 233 its communities with spatially heterogeneous irradiance, such as woodlands or mesquite savannas in the USA (Grace et al., 2001) and open and shaded meadows in India (Kaul and Sapru, 1973), although in Hungary it mostly occurs in shortgrass steppe or on disturbed ground (Soó, 1973, pp. 429–430). The two non-invasive native species in our study were Chrysopogon gryllus (Torn.) Trin. and Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng., which are typical of xeric grasslands in Hungary (Soó, 1973, pp. 445–446). B. ischaemum often reaches local dominance after a disturbance in short grasslands on loess or sand substrate (Zólyomi and Fekete, 1994). Each species belongs to the NADP-ME C4 biochemical subtype except C. dactylon, which is a NAD-ME C4 species (Sage and Monson, 1999, pp. 568–576). Plants were collected from semiarid temperate forest steppe vegetation or from arable land on loess or sand 20 km E (loess) or 60 km SE (sand) of Budapest between July and October 2002 (C. gryllus), in 2002 and 2004 (C. dactylon and S. halepense), or in 2003 and 2004 (B. ischaemum). Three individuals per species, along with their soil monoliths, were excavated, placed into 4-l plastic pots and transferred to an on-campus growth facility in Budapest. Each pot contained the tillers of one grass species only. Shoots were cut back to 1 cm above soil surface immediately after transplanting and thereafter regularly every 3 months so that we could maintain manageable shoot size and comparable shoot age during the full course of measurements. Plants were grown in a growth room under natural irradiance supplemented by a 1000-W artificial halogen light source over a daily photoperiod of 12 h from April to October and 9 h from November to March. Each plant was allowed to grow in the growth room for at least 1 year—with shoot cutback once every 3 months—before leaf gas exchange measurements were made. Pots were rotated every 3 weeks to minimize the effects of possible heterogeneous light distribution on the bench. Mean PPFD in the height of grass foliage, which included the irradiance from the 1000 W halogen lamp, varied between 440 and 810 mol photon m−2 s−1 in summer, and between 135 and 180 mol photon m−2 s−1 in winter on clear days. Air temperature and humidity was measured hourly by using an HOBO Pro RH/Temp device (Onset Computers Inc., Bourne, MA, USA). Mean air temperature was 24.0 ± 4.4 and 18.5 ± 2.3 ◦ C in summer and winter, respectively, relative air humidity varied between 20 and 80% during the day. Plants were watered regularly (every second or third day), and supplied with mineral nutrients (0.5 ml per pot, 13% N, 4.5% P2 O5 , 6.5% K2 O plus micronutrients, Vitaflora, Hungary) at 3week intervals. Plants remained in vegetative stage throughout the leaf gas exchange measurement periods. 2.2. Leaf gas exchange measurements Laboratory leaf gas exchange measurements were made between 7 and 16 April 2004, and in June or July 2004 and 2005 by using an open system infrared gas analyzer (ADC LCA-4 with PLC4-B leaf chamber, Analytical Development Co., BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK). Plants collected in 2002 and 2003 were measured in 2004 or 2005, while those collected in 2004 were measured in 2005. Measurements were performed on three individuals per species (n = 3, except for C. gryllus) with one to four replicates per individual. Each replicate measurement was conducted on a group of two to four fully developed leaf blades (the second or third leaf count from the top). Each leaf was measured only once. In C. gryllus only two individuals were available (n = 2) due to dieback in the third pot. Gas exchange rates were calculated for unit leaf area, where one sided leaf surface area was obtained by multiplying the sum of leaf widths with chamber length (2.5 cm). Each replicate measurement consisted of three consecutive phases as follows. (Phase 1) Leaves were first incubated 234 A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 under 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD white actinic light until steady state gas exchange (A, gs , Ci ) readings were achieved (photosynthetic light induction, this usually took 50–80 min). (Phase 2) PPFD was decreased to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 in one step (taking 10–15 s) by placing three neutral density filters in the light path without opening the leaf chamber, and then illumination was maintained at this level until the new steady state leaf gas exchange rate was reached (usually in 25–30 min). The application of neutral density filters enabled us to change light intensity without affecting spectral composition. (Phase 3) PPFD was returned to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 in one step by removing the neutral density filters from the light path, thus we could measure photosynthetic light induction (after 25–30 min) on leaves previously incubated to the same high PPFD (during Phase 1). (Light induction in Phase 1 took about twice as long in Phase 3 because plants were under moderate light in the growth room or laboratory prior to measurement.) Stationary net photosynthetic rate (A) achieved during Phase 3 was considered the steady state rate at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD. The high and low light intensity that were applied during the measurement closely matched the average PPFD the studied species experience in their forest steppe habitat when they are exposed to full sun (1400–1740 mol photon m−2 s−1 ) and partially shaded by shrub canopy (270–430 mol photon m−2 s−1 ), respectively (A. Mojzes, unpublished data). Leaf gas exchange parameters were calculated during the measurement using the equations of von Caemmerer and Farquhar (1981), and automatically saved every 30 s. Standard measurement conditions in the leaf chamber were provided by the system component ADC LC4-LMC-002/B Leaf Chamber Microclimate Control Unit (Analytical Development Co., BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK), and were as follows: 350 vpm CO2 concentration in the incoming air, 25 ± 0.3 ◦ C air temperature and 40% relative air humidity. 2.3. Data analysis From standard gas exchange data measured (net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs ), and mesophyll air space CO2 partial pressure (Ci )) the following variables were obtained for comparisons. (1) To describe the dynamics of the transition between stages 1 (initial high-light phase) and 2 (low-light steady state) we calculated: tgdrop time (s) needed for the partial closure of stomata, measured as the duration of continuous decline of gs after neutral density filters were inserted into the light path; gdrop speed of stomatal closure (mmol H2 O m−2 s−1 min−1 ) obtained as the slope of the linear regression line fitted to data points (gs vs. time) in the continuously declining part of the response (see Fay and Knapp, 1993, 1995 for references); tAdrop duration of the continuous decline of net photosynthetic rate after neutral density filters were inserted into the light path (s, calculated in the same way as tgdrop ); tlag close time lag of stomatal closure behind the decline of A in response to decreased PPFD (s). Calculated as (tgdrop − tAdrop ); costPWUE water cost associated with asynchronous decrease of A and gs following a drop in PPFD. Difference of the intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (PWUE, mmol CO2 mol−1 H2 O, calculated as A/gs , Fig. 1. Time courses of photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs ) for Sorghum halepense leaves incubated under moderate light (one replicate measurement). Leaves were illuminated with 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD during Phase 1, then during Phase 2 PPFD was abruptly decreased to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 (indicated by the downward arrow), and after steady state gas exchange was achieved PPFD was increased to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 again (shown by the upward arrow, Phase 3). Hemsley and Poole, 2004, p. 236.) from its highlight steady state value were integrated over the course of its decline and subsequent monotonous increase following the PPFD drop from 1300 to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 . As time courses showed certain noise (see Fig. 1), the calculation was as follows. The initial high-light steady state PWUE was obtained as the mean of the last 20–26 consecutive data points (10–13 min) prior to the drop in illumination (similar to the procedure used by Horton and Neufeld, 1998 to obtain Amax ). The transient part of the curve was smoothed by using moving average with a frame of three recorded data, and area portions determined by successive data points and the initial PWUE value was calculated and summed. During this response, PWUE may have reached values above initial. In such cases the difference from steady state was considered negative, thus decreasing the overall water cost. This variable estimated the amount of water lost through stomata in a photosynthetically inefficient way during the transition period when, due to the time lag of stomatal closure behind the decline of A, water loss was associated with marginal carbon gain under low light. (2) To characterize photosynthetic light induction when PPFD was suddenly increased to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 for leaves in steady state gas exchange under low light (Phase 3): tArise time (s) taken to reach 90% of steady state A, determined by fitting a sigmoid (Boltzman) function to the time course of A following PPFD increase. During light induction, photosynthetic rate usually increases following a sigmoid course, particularly when initial stomatal conductance is low (Kirschbaum and Pearcy, 1988; Pearcy et al., 1991); tgrise time needed to reach 90% of steady state gs (s). Calculation as described for tArise ; tlag open delay of stomatal opening behind the increase of A to 90% steady state value (s). Calculated as the difference tgrise − tArise ; sA/Ci magnitude of stomatal limitation during photosynthetic light induction. Using data where both A and Ci increased monotonously in the course of light induction, A was plotted against Ci and the slope of the fitted linear regression line was used to assess stomatal limitation. When pho- A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 tosynthetic rate during light induction is restricted by insufficient openness of stomata rather than slow activation of photosynthetic enzymes and the buildup of metabolic pools, the increase of A with elevating Ci is steep and the slope may even approach that of the linear part of the steady state CO2 response of photosynthesis (Pearcy et al., 1996). (3) For the comparison of performance under the two steady states (i.e. at 1300 and 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD): gs relative amplitude of stomatal response: the difference between the steady state gs at 270 and 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD (means of the last 20–26 successive readings of gs in Phases 2 and 1, respectively) expressed as a percentage of gs at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 , %); A relative amplitude of photosynthetic response: the difference between steady state photosynthetic rate at 270 and 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, expressed as a percentage of A at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 , %). At 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, A was calculated as described for gs , while at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, it was obtained from the sigmoid (Boltzman) function fitted for the time course of A during Phase 3; PWUE270 and PWUE1300 steady state PWUE at 270 and PPFD, 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 respectively (A/gs , mmol CO2 mol−1 H2 O, calculated as means of the last 20–26 successive readings of PWUE in the Phases 2 and 3, respectively). When two to four replicate measurements were performed on the same individual the above variables were averaged for the individual, and the means (as independent samples) were used for statistical analyses. For interspecific comparisons oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) with species as fixed effect was applied with subsequent Tukey HSD post hoc tests to analyze significant differences among means. For each species, paired t-tests were used to compare the duration or magnitude of simultaneous or related processes (i.e. tgdrop and tAdrop , gs and A, tArise and tgrise , tgdrop and tgrise , tlag close and tlag open , PWUE270 and PWUE1300 , A at 270 and 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, gs at 270 and 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD). These analyses were also repeated for species groups by merging individual means for C. dactylon and S. halepense (invasives, n = 6), and those for B. ischaemum and C. gryllus (non-invasives, n = 5). Unpaired ttests were applied to compare means of the two groups. When data did not meet the normality assumption, non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test was conducted. Paired t-tests were executed for within-group comparisons. For each statistical test, the significance level was p = 0.05, and differences were considered marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.1. Linear regressions and exploratory statistics were completed by using the Statistica 7.0 package (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA). 3. Results For each grass species, the stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate closely tracked changes in PPFD and the time course 235 of responses was similar for each species (see Fig. 1 for an example). The partial closure of stomata after the drop in light level took 248–379 s, while reopening with increased PPFD lasted for 189–354 s on average. The speed of stomatal closure (gdrop ) was three times higher for C. dactylon (35.7 mmol H2 O m−2 s−1 min−1 ), than for C. gryllus (11.2 mmol H2 O m−2 s−1 min−1 ), while S. halepense and B. ischaemum showed intermediate values (22.2 and 23.2 mmol H2 O m−2 s−1 min−1 , respectively). However, tgdrop did not differ significantly between species (Fig. 2a). In response to marked decline in PPFD, net photosynthetic rate (A) decreased suddenly, within 123–160 s. It was followed by the partial closure of stomata (decline in gs ) with 88–256 s delay (Fig. 2b). Consequently, during this transient phase, intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (PWUE = A/gs ) dropped quickly to a minimum, then slowly increased again to a value matching or even exceeding the prior steady state value with subsequent partial closure of stomata. No statistically significant difference appeared in costPWUE among species. However, costPWUE was somewhat below zero, resulting in a gain rather than a loss of PWUE during the transient phase for S. halepense, while a small positive value was found for the other three grasses (Fig. 2c). Steady state intrinsic PWUE was higher at 270 than at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD for the invasive C. dactylon and S. halepense, but was not significantly different for the noninvasive B. ischaemum and C. gryllus (Fig. 3a). This was due to the greater reduction in gs than in A in response to decreased light intensity for the two invasive grasses (gs > A), although this difference was only marginally significant for C. dactylon (p = 0.072). In contrast, for the two non-invasive species gs and A were statistically similar (Fig. 3b). Species did not differ in steady state intrinsic PWUE under either light condition (Fig. 3a). Under low light, there was no significant difference in either gs or A among species (Fig. 3c and d). Under high-light, steady state A of C. dactylon exceeded that of C. gryllus and tended to be higher (marginal significance) than that of S. halepense and B. ischaemum (Fig. 3c). The 8.9–51.3% higher gs for C. dactylon than for the other three species at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD probably does not explain this difference as interspecific differences in gs were statistically non-significant (Fig. 3d). With PPFD reduction to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 , A diminished significantly for each species except for C. gryllus (for which the drop was also obvious, but statistically not significant probably due to the small sample size (n = 2), Fig. 3c). The magnitude of change in A (A) was greatest for C. dactylon (Fig. 3b). Likewise, C. dactylon exhibited the most marked and significant decline in gs among species, while the reduction of this variable in response to decreased light intensity was only marginally significant for S. halepense and B. ischaemum, and nonsignificant for C. gryllus (Fig. 3d). Neither gs nor A differed significantly between these three species (Fig. 3b). Consequently, at 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD C. dactylon maintained only 36% of its A at 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 PPFD, while for the rest of the species this proportion was 53.5–55.4%. When the light intensity was elevated again to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 after steady state at 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 , the duration of both stomatal opening and photosynthetic induction (reaching 90% of the high-light steady state values in gs and A, respectively) were statistically similar for all species studied. Nevertheless, tgrise was 46.7% lower (marginally significant, p = 0.072) for S. halepense than for C. gryllus (Fig. 2d). The delay of stomatal opening behind the enhancement of A was 123 and 83 s for C. dactylon and C. gryllus, respectively, while it was negligible for S. halepense and B. ischaemum. However, differences in tlag open values were not significant among species (Fig. 2b). Intrinsic PWUE did not display a characteristic pattern during the low-to-high-light switch, as it reached gradually a new steady state. This is probably 236 A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 Fig. 2. Gas exchange variables during transient states associated with abrupt changes in PPFD. (a) tgdrop on PPFD decline from 1300 to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 and tgrise in response to subsequent reverse change in PPFD; (b) tlag close and tlag open ; (c) costPWUE ; (d) tgrise and tArise when PPFD was increased from 270 to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 . Error bars show ±1 S.E. of two individuals for C. gryllus (n = 2) and three individuals for the rest of the species (n = 3). Species with the same letter above bars are not significantly different for the given variable (p < 0.05). When two variables are plotted on a graph, lower and upper case letters are used to indicate significance for the different variables. Within-species significant difference (p < 0.05) is marked by an asterisk. Parentheses and square brackets indicate marginal significance (0.05 < p < 0.1) between two species or between two associated variables within a species. explained partly by the smaller delay of stomatal response behind the abrupt change of A in response to increase than to decrease in PPFD, although in all four species the difference between tlag open and tlag close was not significant, Fig. 2b). When PPFD was increased to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 again, Ci temporarily declined as A increased more rapidly than gs and CO2 supply lagged behind demand. Then, Ci gradually increased again as stomata opened, and reached a new steady state value. During this low-to-high-light transition, A and Ci correlated significantly for one individual of C. gryllus and for two individuals of C. dactylon and B. ischaemum only. Thus, interspecific comparison of the slope of the A/Ci relationship (sA/Ci ) was not possible. Mean values of sA/Ci ranged from 0.047 to 0.067. For each species tgdrop and tgrise was not significantly different (Fig. 2a). We repeated our analyses for species groups as well when the species were merged into two groups: invasives (C. dactylon and S. halepense) and non-invasives (B. ischaemum and C. gryllus). Only two variables were significantly different between groups: both gs and PWUE270 were higher for invasives than for non-invasives (Fig. 4a and b). Within groups, gs exceeded A, and PWUE270 surpassed PWUE1300 for invasives, while no such differences appeared in the non-invasive group. In both groups, stomatal closure took Fig. 3. Steady state gas exchange variables under high (1300) and low (270 mol photon m−2 s−1 ) PPFD: (a) intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (PWUE = A/gs ); (b) percentage decline in A (A, %) and gs (gs , %) in response to decline in PPFD from 1300 to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 ; (c) net photosynthetic rate (A); (d) stomatal conductance (gs ). Labels as in Fig. 2. A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 Fig. 4. Selected gas exchange variables for the invasive group (C. dactylon and S. halepense) and the non-invasive group (B. ischaemum and C. gryllus) of species studied: (a) percentage decline in A (A, %) and gs (gs , %) in response to drop in PPFD from high (1300) to low (270 mol photon m−2 s−1 ); (b) intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency (PWUE = A/gs ) under high and low PPFD. For a given variable, significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups is indicated by different letters, while within-group significant difference is marked by an asterisk. Lower and upper case letters are used for different variables on the same graph. Error bars show ±1 S.E. of six and five individuals (n = 6 and 5) in the invasive and in the non-invasive group, respectively. significantly longer than the decline of A (tgdrop > tAdrop , by 80.1% for invasives and 127% for non-invasives), and steady state values of both gs and A were significantly higher under high than under low light. Stomatal opening lasted for 50% longer than photosynthetic induction in the invasive group, while tArise and tgrise were statistically similar for non-invasives. In line with interspecific comparisons, we did not find significant differences between tlag open and tlag close , and between tgdrop and tgrise respectively in either the invasive or the non-invasive group. 4. Discussion In accordance with the prior hypothesis, the group of the invasive S. halepense and C. dactylon achieved higher steady state intrinsic water use efficiency under low light than the group of the non-invasive C. gryllus and B. ischaemum. This was a consequence of a greater reduction in gs than in A with a drop in PPFD from 1300 to 270 mol photon m−2 s−1 for the two invasive species, which resulted in an enhanced PWUE at low, compared to high, light conditions. Considering the similar carbon gain under low light for the four species, water spared in such a way, may allow these two invasive grasses to better exploit periods of moderate irradiance, and thus confer advantage for them particularly in semiarid environments. Reduction in A with light level drop was similar for the three NADP-ME grasses in our study, but it was greatest for the NAD-ME C. dactylon. This suggests that the maintenance of a high carbon assimilation rate under moderate light might be associated with the higher efficiency of CO2 -concentrating mechanism and hence greater quantum yield of NADP-ME than NAD-ME C4 species 237 (Pearcy and Ehleringer, 1984), rather than to the species’ invasive potential. However, an improved steady state PWUE270 for C. dactylon suggests that a marked reduction in photosynthetic rate with drop in PPFD does not necessarily mean a lower degree of shade tolerance for NAD-ME than for NADP-ME C4 species. C. dactylon achieved high PWUE270 mainly through marked stomatal closure with concomitant reduction in A, even exceeding the other invasive grass S. halepense in gs . In response to an abrupt decline in PPFD the great amplitude of reduction in gs for C. dactylon was associated with a high speed of stomatal closure, even exceeding literature values reported for other C3 or C4 grasses (12.4–26.1 mmol H2 O m−2 s−1 min−1 , Knapp, 1993; Fay and Knapp, 1993, 1995). In contrast, gdrop of the other three species studied here remained within or close to this range. However, the overall duration of partial stomatal closure with PPFD drop (determined by both speed and amplitude) was not significantly different between invasive and non-invasive grasses. No net loss in intrinsic photosynthetic water use efficiency during the high-to-low light transition observed for S. halepense suggests an efficient light utilization at a negligible water cost for this species. Furthermore, S. halepense slightly exceeded the noninvasive C. gryllus in the speed of stomatal opening when PPFD was elevated from 270 to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 . These results indicate a highly efficient light-tracking behavior of the stomata for S. halepense that might contribute to the species’ success in habitats with heterogeneous light climate. Indeed, S. halepense is one of the most successful weeds in tall monocultures like corn or millet (Holm et al., 1977, pp. 54–61), where light penetrating the canopy may be highly variable in time. Stuart et al. (1985) also found sensitive stomatal regulation in response to water stress or increasing leaf temperature in this species in its natural habitat. Under field conditions similar to our study, both C. dactylon and S. halepense were found to be more efficient in accumulating micronutrients, particularly K+ , than either B. ischaemum or C. gryllus (Kovács et al., 2002). Potassium plays a key role in stomatal regulation and photosynthesis (Marschner, 1995, pp. 299–308). Stomatal response of the non-invasive B. ischaemum to abrupt decline in PPFD (i.e. gdrop , tlag close ), and its steady state PWUE270 were intermediate between those of the invasive species in our study (C. dactylon and/or S. halepense) and the non-invasive C. gryllus. Similar to the two invasives, B. ischaemum exhibited at least marginally significant reduction in both steady state A and gs in response to decrease in PPFD. However, this species did not achieve an enhancement in PWUE at low light, like the non-invasive C. gryllus. Also, a sizeable loss in water use efficiency associated with the reduction in A appeared for B. ischaemum during the high-to-low light transition. Such intermediacy in physiology between invasives and non-invasives is consistent with the species’ ecological behavior in terms of its non-invasive character coupled with an ability to reach local dominance on disturbance in semiarid temperate grasslands (Zólyomi and Fekete, 1994). Compared to a traditional crop and an introduced exotic C4 grass species in the semiarid temperate Loess Hills of China, Xu et al. (2006) found intermediate stomatal sensitivity and WUE of biomass production for the native B. ischaemum when exposed to water stress. When PPFD was elevated from 270 to 1300 mol photon m−2 s−1 , A reached the new steady state under similar time interval for all four species. This is in contrast with the hypothesis that invasive grasses would be faster in increasing assimilation rate in response to higher light availability that could contribute to a better exploitation of periods of high-light relative to non-invasive grasses. This, however, should be interpreted by considering that the species studied here originally inhabit semiarid high-light environments (grasslands or herbaceous crops). In such habitats, water sparing through rapid and substantial stomatal closure on irradi- 238 A. Mojzes, T. Kalapos / Environmental and Experimental Botany 64 (2008) 232–238 ance drop may be of higher adaptive value than maximizing carbon gain by faster and more marked photosynthetic induction on PPFD increase. Earlier studies suggest that stomatal regulation maximizes water use efficiency in C4 species from high light, periodically water limited habitats (Knapp, 1993; Huxman and Monson, 2003). Rapid photosynthetic light induction is probably more advantageous for plants living in light-limited environments (such as forest understorey), as it has already been shown in experimental studies (e.g. Chazdon and Pearcy, 1986; Ögren and Sundin, 1996; Horton and Neufeld, 1998). The invasive group studied (and particularly C. dactylon) exhibited significant delay in stomatal opening relative to the rise of A to the new steady state in response to increased PPFD. This suggests that after incubation under low light the activation of photosynthetic enzymes and the buildup of metabolite pools for transfer between mesophyll and bundle sheath are faster than simultaneous opening of stomata. The sparse significantly positive relationship between A and Ci during the transition from low to high-light steady state for the four species and the lack of difference in sA/Ci between the invasive and the non-invasive groups indicate similarly minimal stomatal limitation during photosynthetic light induction for these species irrespective of their invasive capacity. 5. Conclusions Based on the study of two pairs of species, our results support the hypothesis that among C4 perennial grasses the closure of stomata with drop in PPFD is more efficient for invasive than for noninvasive species. The greater magnitude of stomatal closure and/or enhanced water use efficiency in the low-light steady state enables invasives to use water more sparingly than non-invasives. These in turn may translate to higher growth rate and competitive success for invasive grasses in habitats of heterogeneous light regime. Our results, however, do not support the hypothesis of faster photosynthetic light induction upon increased PPFD for invasive than for non-invasive C4 grass species. Nevertheless, these results suggest one candidate mechanism contributing to the success of invasive grasses and await further validation on other species and in other ecosystems. Acknowledgements Support from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA T03828, M41454) is greatly appreciated. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and Timothy Brian Hoelzle for language corrections. References Awada, T., Moser, L.E., Schacht, W.H., Reece, P.E., 2002. Stomatal variability of native warm-season grasses from the Nebraska Sandhills. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82, 349–355. Chazdon, R.L., Pearcy, R.W., 1986. Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species I. Induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions. Oecologia 69, 517–523. Chen, S., Bai, Y., Zhang, L., Han, X., 2005. Comparing physiological responses of two dominant grass species to nitrogen addition in Xilin River Basin of China. Environ. Exp. Bot. 53, 65–75. Colom, M.R., Vazzana, C., 2003. Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of droughtresistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 49, 135–144. Dias-Filho, M.B., 2002. Photosynthetic light response of the C4 grasses Brachiaria brizantha and B. humidicola under shade. Scientia Agricola 59, 65–68. Fay, P.A., Knapp, A.K., 1993. Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of Avena sativa (Poaceae) to a variable light environment. Am. J. Bot. 80, 1369–1373. Fay, P.A., Knapp, A.K., 1995. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to shade in sorghum, soybean and eastern gammagrass. Physiol. Plant. 94, 613–620. Furbank, R.T., Walker, D.A., 1985. Photosynthetic induction in C4 leaves. Planta 163, 75–83. Grace, J.B., Smith, M.D., Grace, S.L., Collins, S.L., Stohlgren, T.J., 2001. Interactions between fire and invasive plants in temperate grasslands of North America. In: Galley, K.E.M., Wilson, T.P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Invasive Species Workshop: the Role of Fire in the Control and Spread of Invasive Species. Fire Conference 2000: the First National Congress on Fire Ecology, Prevention and Management. Miscellaneous Publication, No. 11, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, pp. 40–65. Guenni, O., Baruch, Z., Marín, D., 2004. Responses to drought of five Brachiaria species. II. Water relations and leaf gas exchange. Plant Soil 258, 249–260. Hamerlynck, E.P., 2001. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) in contrasting urban environments. Photosynthetica 39, 79–86. Hemsley, A.R., Poole, I. (Eds.), 2004. The Evolution of Plant Physiology: From Whole Plants to Ecosystems. Elsevier Academic Press, p. 236. Hetherington, A.M., Woodward, F.I., 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901–908. Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V., Herberger, J.P., 1977. The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. Horton, J.L., Neufeld, H.S., 1998. Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114, 11–19. Huxman, T.E., Monson, R.K., 2003. Stomatal responses of C3 , C3 –C4 and C4 Flaveria species to light and intercellular CO2 concentration: implications for the evolution of stomatal behaviour. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 313–322. Jones, H.G., 1992. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kalapos, T., van den Boogaard, R., Lambers, H., 1996. Effect of soil drying on growth, biomass allocation and leaf gas exchange of two annual grass species. Plant Soil 185, 137–149. Kaul, V., Sapru, B.L., 1973. The phytosociology and biomass production relations of seven meadowlands in Srinagar. Vegetatio 28, 19–39. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Pearcy, R.W., 1988. Gas exchange analysis of the relative importance of stomatal and biochemical factors in photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiol. 86, 782–785. Knapp, A.K., 1993. Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses: consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74, 113–123. Knapp, A.K., Smith, W.K., 1987. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency. Oecologia 74, 62–67. Kovács, M., Engloner, A., Németh, N., Szirmai, O., Turcsányi, G., 2002. Chemical composition of Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) in Hungary. Acta Agron. Hung. 50, 151–156. Long, S.P., 1983. C4 photosynthesis at low temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 6, 345–363. Marschner, H., 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London. Morse, L.J., Day, T.A., Faeth, S.H., 2002. Effect of Neotyphodium endophyte infection on growth and leaf gas exchange of Arizona fescue under contrasting water availability regimes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 48, 257–268. Nobel, P.S., 1983. Biophysical Plant Physiology and Ecology. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. Ögren, E., Sundin, U., 1996. Photosynthetic responses to variable light: a comparison of species from contrasting habitats. Oecologia 106, 18–27. Pearcy, R.W., Ehleringer, J., 1984. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 1–13. Pearcy, R.W., Pons, T.L., Sassenrath, G.F., 1991. Dynamic limitations to photosynthetic gas exchange in a soybean canopy. In: Impact of Global Climatic Changes on Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity. Proceedings of the Indo-Us Workshop, January 8–12, 1991, New Delhi, India. Oxford & IbH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., pp. 525–538. Pearcy, R.W., Krall, J.P., Sassenrath-Cole, G.F., 1996. Photosynthesis in fluctuating light environments. In: Baker, N.R. (Ed.), Photosynthesis and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 321–346. Pugnaire, F.I., Haase, P., 1996. Comparative physiology and growth of two perennial tussock grass species in a semi-arid environment. Ann. Bot. 77, 81–86. Sage, R.F., McKown, A.D., 2006. Is C4 photosynthesis less phenotypically plastic than C3 photosynthesis? J. Exp. Bot. 57, 303–317. Sage, R.F., Monson, R.K. (Eds.), 1999. C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. Soó, R., 1973. A Magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertani és növényföldrajzi kézikönyve (Synopsis Systematico-Geobotanica Florae Vegetationisque Hungariae). Tomus V. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest (in Hungarian). Stuart, B.L., Krieg, D.R., Abernathy, J.R., 1985. Photosynthesis and stomatalconductance responses of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) to water stress. Weed Sci. 33, 635–639. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C., Pearcy, R.W., 1992. Dynamic stomatal behavior and its role in carbon gain during lightflecks of a gap phase and an understory Piper species acclimated to high and low light. Oecologia 92, 222–228. von Caemmerer, S., Farquhar, G.D., 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387. Williams, D.G., Black, R.A., 1994. Drought response of a native and introduced Hawaiian grass. Oecologia 97, 512–519. Xu, B., Li, F., Shan, L., Ma, Y., Ichizen, N., Huang, J., 2006. Gas exchange, biomass partition, and water relationships of three grass seedlings under water stress. Weed Biol. Manage. 6, 79–88. Zólyomi, B., Fekete, G., 1994. The Pannonian loess steppe: differentiation in space and time. Abstracta Botanica 18, 29–41.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz