French resolution regime: Secondary legislation Briefing note 1 November 2013 French resolution regime: Secondary legislation The law of 26 July 2013 established a new resolution regime for credit institutions, financial holding companies, mixed financial holding companies and investment firms, subject to certain specifications to be set out in a decree. Such decree was adopted on 30 October 2013. We give a rundown below of the main provisions of its imports. holding companies and certain investment firms (each an "Entity", both together the "Entities") in anticipation of the EU draft Directive on recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms; French resolution regime: brief refresher The law n° 2013-672 of 26 July 2013 on ring-fencing and resolution (the "Ring-Fencing and Resolution Law")1 has introduced, amongst others, the following changes under French law: 1 a separation of certain speculative trading and investment activities for own account of systemically important French banks into dedicated subsidiaries; a new resolution regime for credit institutions, financial holding companies, mixed financial The text of the Ring-Fencing and Resolution Law is available at: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.d o?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000027754539. For further analysis of the changes implemented by the Ring-Fencing and Resolution Law, see our client briefing at http://www.cliffordchance.com. the French banking and insurance supervisor ("ACP") is vested with new resolution powers and is now renamed Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution ("ACPR"). These powers are exercised by a newly created "resolution" committee within the ACPR; new rules were introduced on remuneration of managers and certain senior employees on top of CRD III and CRD IV rules. The implementation of the RingFencing and Resolution Law was requiring additional secondary regulations, including in order to provide for practical arrangements regarding the functioning of the newly established resolution committee and its resolution powers, which is the purpose of the decree n° 2013-978 of 30 October 2013 (the "Decree"), published at Journal Officiel n° 0256, dated 3 November 2013. Key issues The resolution committee of the ACPR, being in charge of preventing and resolving banking crises, is vested with broad resolution powers The exercise of such resolution powers is subject to a contradictory procedure The measures taken by the resolution committee are effective against third parties The conditions upon which the "no creditor worse off" principle is implemented are specified The resolution committee and its office The new resolution regime is implemented by a separate resolution committee, created by the RingFencing and Resolution Law within the ACPR (next to the supervision committee and to the sanction committee). 2 French resolution regime: Secondary legislation As a reminder, the resolution committee is specifically in charge of elaborating and implementing measures for the prevention and resolution of banking crises in order to achieve the following objectives: to preserve financial stability; to ensure the continuity of activities, services and transactions of Entities, the failure of which would have severe consequences for the French economy; to protect deposits; and to avoid or limit to the fullest extent possible, any public bailout. In order to achieve such objectives, the Decree creates within the ACPR a new resolution office (direction de la résolution) which is in charge of preparing the resolution committee's work and implementing its decisions. The resolution office could require the ACPR to provide information that the latter may hold within the exercise of its prudential control, as well as any document or internal work which is necessary to achieve the resolution committee's objectives. It should be noted that, like the supervision committee, the resolution committee has also been given the power to start sanction proceedings against an Entity. Clarifications regarding certain resolution powers The resolution committee has been given broad resolution powers, which include, among other things, restructuring powers and powers to replace the management of a failing Entity. The Decree specifies the procedure to be followed when exercising the same. next business day applies as from the publication of such decision on the ACPR's website, being specified that the relevant Entity must also publish such decision on its website (or any such other media as is adequately advertised). Like the supervision committee, the resolution committee must apply a contradictory procedure which is regulated by the Decree: a resolution measure has to be notified to the relevant Entity and the notification must explain the reasons given to such measure; should the resolution measure be other than a request for information, the legal representative of the relevant Entity must be called upon to attend a hearing at least five business days before such hearing. It is specified that the convened person may be assisted or represented by a person of its choice and must be given at least five business days to address its comments to the resolution committee. If resolution measures are taken in a case of urgency, the resolution committee has three months as from the notification of such provisional measures to deliver a final decision following a contradictory procedure. The Decree has also clarified an important issue by specifying that the measures taken by the resolution committee are effective (opposable) against third parties as from their publication on the ACPR's website. The Decree specifies the terms of the resolution committee's powers: the prohibition of payment of all or part of the debts capable of being bailed-in under the bail-in powers cannot exceed six months (renewable once for the same period of time) as from the publication of the resolution decision on the ACPR's website; the suspension of close-out netting rights until 5.00 pm the Conditions of the "no creditor worse off" principle When taking a resolution measure, the Ring-Fencing and Resolution Law requires the ACPR to make sure that no shareholder or creditor incur losses in resolution greater that it would have suffered in judicial liquidation (this principle is commonly referred to as the "no creditor worse off" principle). The Ring-Fencing and Resolution Law further specifies that the conditions upon which this principle is implemented are set out in a decree. The Decree then provides for the following: the loss estimate must take into account the assets' liquidation value (valeur de realisation) on the day where the resolution measure was notified to the Entity; the total estimated losses are deemed to be allocated in the following order, which is the same as under a bail-in: – first, to shareholders; – secondly, to holders of subordinated debt of second priority issued under Article L.228-97 of the Code de Commerce, titres participatifs and other second priority instruments whose terms of issue provide that they would bear French resolution regime: Secondary legislation losses on a going concern basis; – thirdly, to holders of other notes that are subordinated under their terms of issue to senior secured or unsecured creditors. It should be noted that the estimated losses are equally allocated between creditors 60284-5-6571-v0.5 having the same rank proportionally to the value of their respective debts. Further developments 3 Indeed, issues such as the thresholds of members' contributions to the Fonds de garantie des dépôts et de résolution (FGDR) are still outstanding and should also be determined by decree. The Decree specifies the terms of the new French resolution regime but other decrees should be expected. FR-3000-02 4 French resolution regime: Secondary legislation Clifford Chance contacts If you would like to know more about the subjects covered in this publication or our services, please contact: Frédérick Lacroix Sébastien Praicheux Partner Senior Associate T: +33 1 44 05 52 52 M: +33 6 88 14 46 73 E: [email protected] T: +33 1 44 05 52 52 M: +33 6 07 74 14 68 E: [email protected] This publication does not necessarily deal with every important topic or cover every aspect of the topics with which it deals. It is not designed to provide legal or other advice. Clifford Chance, 9 Place Vendôme, CS 50018, 75038 Paris Cedex 01, France © Clifford Chance Europe LLP 2012 Clifford Chance Europe LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC323571 Registered office: 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ We use the word 'partner' to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications www.cliffordchance.com Abu Dhabi ■ Amsterdam ■ Bangkok ■ Barcelona ■ Beijing ■ Brussels ■ Bucharest ■ Casablanca ■ Doha ■ Dubai ■ Düsseldorf ■ Frankfurt ■ Hong Kong ■ Istanbul ■ Kyiv ■ London ■ Luxembourg ■ Madrid ■ Milan ■ Moscow ■ Munich ■ New York ■ Paris ■ Perth ■ Prague ■ Riyadh* ■ Rome ■ São Paulo ■ Shanghai ■ Singapore ■ Sydney ■ Tokyo ■ Warsaw ■ Washington, D.C. *Clifford Chance has a co-operation agreement with Al-Jadaan & Partners Law Firm in Riyadh.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz