COURSE SYLLABUS© We believe in respect for the individual, in personal integrity and in education as a means of improving the human condition. LAST PREPARED/UPDATED ON: Oct 2015 INSTRUCTOR DETAILS INSTRUCTOR: e-mail: phone: office room: Dr. Lydia Wazir-Staubmann [email protected] 0664 736 555 19 1.17 COURSE DETAILS TERM: COURSE TITLE: PREREQUISITES: CLASS LIMIT: LAB FEE: TEXTBOOK / REQUIRED READING MATERIALS: Fall 2, 2015 POLT 1550/52 Introduction to Political Argumentation and Debate GEA: 1, 2; GCP: SSHB, CRI None 25 None Freeley, J. Austin. Argumentation and Debate; Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. 13th Int Edition. Cengage Learning. 2014 Cavender, Nancy abd Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. 12th Edition. Cengage Learning. 2014 Other materials and articles will be assigned during the course of the semester. There will be several assignments to look up videos of famous debates online. All such assignments are required. COURSE DESCRIPTION Introduces students to the basic principles of debate, emphasizing the development of research, critical thinking, and oral presentation skills. Students research one or more contemporary public policy issues and are expected to attend and participate in campus debates on those issues. The course is open to students of all majors. COURSE OBJECTIVES / LEARNING OUTCOMES Students will learn to become more effective critical thinkers and consumers of information and arguments. This will be accomplished by achieving the following: - Understanding, identifying and evaluating the types of arguments, reasoning processes, and logical fallacies Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -1- - Knowing what evidence is, how to use it to prove a claim, and how to evaluate the adequacy of your and opposing evidence - Learning to organize arguments into a persuasive case - Developing skills in refutation and cross examination The educational benefits of engaging in academic debate are numerous: Debate provides preparation for effective participation in a democratic society Debate offers preparation for leadership Debate offers training in argumentation Debate provides for investigation and analysis of significant contemporary problems Debate develops proficiency in critical thinking Debate is an integrator of knowledge Debate develops proficiency in purposeful inquiry Debate emphasizes quality instruction [mentoring] Debate encourages student scholarship Debate develops the ability to make prompt, analytical responses Debate develops critical listening Debate develops proficiency in writing Debate encourages mature judgment Debate develops courage Debate encourages effective speech composition and delivery Debate develops social maturity Debate develops multicultural sensitivities Debate develops computer competencies Debate develops essential proficiencies Source: Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making by Austin J. Freely and David L. Steinberg In this course, students will: identify several argument styles in their learning of argumentation and advocacy skills. expand their ability to make use of several resources in their research of class topic(s). demonstrate their ability to argue and advocate in both oral and written channels. improve upon their critical thinking and critical listening skills as arguers and advocates. demonstrate ethical communication and respect for difference of opinion. communicate an understanding of how value assumptions and questions of policy are integrated within argumentative and advocacy communication. Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -2- GRADE BREAKDOWN (Note: instructors can determine the components of evaluations, below is just an example). GRADING SCALE: A: 93-100, A-: 90-92, B+: 87-89, B: 83-86, B-: 80-82, C+: 77-79, C: 73-76, C-: 70-72, D+: 67-69, D: 63-66, F: <63 Written and Oral Work (90%) 30% In Class Debate Participation and Performance (3 in class debate performances @ 100 points each) 20% 2 x Briefs (50 points each) 20% Final Oral Debate (100 points) 10% 1 x persuasive speech (50 points) 10% 1 x Impromptu (10 points) Written Exams (10%) 6 weekly quizzes COURSE POLICIES / ADDITIONAL INFORMATION All written work must be typed in 12 point font, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, with a clear heading up at the top. Your name must be included. All written work (with the exception of quizzes and engagement points) is submitted through WorldClassroom and is due by class time on the assigned due date. If the assignment is submitted electronically, it must be in Microsoft Word (.doc) format, and named with your last name and the assignment (ie. “Wazir - Brief 1.doc”). The Communication Environment: The study of argument engages a wide range of philosophical, political, and ethical questions that cut to the very core of what it means to be a citizen, even a human. I am committed to ensuring that our classroom is a hospitable environment where we can respectfully discuss and debate a wide range of relevant issues. Everyone should feel comfortable to speak their minds, but must do so in a way that enables others to do the same. Attendance: As you might expect, this course has been designed for maximum student participation. Therefore, it is essential to the learning objectives of this program that you are both in attendance and participating. If you miss class you not only miss much of the learning in this course but you will also create difficulties for other students who are relying on you. Don’t miss class unless you absolutely must. Also, understand that if you must miss class you are still responsible for any assignments due, quizzes, information provided in your absence, changes in schedule, etc. We often do engaged activities in class that are worth points, if you are there, you get the points, and if you don’t you will not get the points (no matter what your reason for being absent). Extra Credit: If at the end of the term you are “sitting on the fence” between grades, your attendance may play an important role in where you land. If you are looking for an opportunity to earn “extra credit” this is the ONLY opportunity. Those with perfect attendance (attend all of every session and were never tardy) will have one grade sign (+,-) added to their final grade (i.e, B becomes B+, B+ becomes A-). Even an excused absence will disqualify you from this rare and special opportunity. Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -3- Attendance on debate/presentation days, even when you are not speaking, is required. Failure to attend all speech days will result in a ten-point deduction from your own debate grade for each day missed. Tardiness: Lateness is not acceptable for this class, especially on presentation days. If you are late for class on a presentation day, do not enter while another student is performing! Wait outside until you hear applause, then enter the classroom. If you are late more than three times, we will have a private meeting to discuss your reasons for being late. If you are late again, each tardy will count as an absence. Cell Phones: As with any performance venue, you do not want to be the rude audience member, or worse, the ill-prepared performer. Make sure your cell phones are OFF when you come to class. If it rings during discussion, I will answer it. If it rings during a performance, your grade will drop a letter grade. Late Work Policy: As a general rule, I do not accept late work. You must be prepared to perform, take exams, participate in activities, and submit papers on the assigned due dates. Please do not ask for an extension because of other exams, because you were busy at work, because of extracurricular pressures, because you have too much work to do, because you know you would do a better job with more time, and the like. With that said, I understand that emergencies and different situations arise. If you have extenuating circumstances—that is, if you’re experiencing some sort of problem that you feel is worthy of turning in an assignment late —please come and talk to me PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT’S DUE DATE AND TIME. Perhaps we can work something out, but this will be up to me. Chances are, if you don’t try to talk with me in advance of the assignment being due, I won’t have any sympathy for you. Grade Appeals: If you wish to appeal a grade on an assignment, you need to follow these procedures. I will not discuss individual grades during class time. Nor will I entertain grade complaints during class time. • You need to wait at least 24 hours before submitting your written grade appeal to ensure that you have time to carefully read and consider the feedback. • I will only entertain grade appeals within 14 days of giving the grade. This means, that you cannot come to me at the end of the semester and attempt to appeal a grade from the beginning of the semester. • After you have read my feedback, submit a typed, written appeal that identifies the specific issue in question (e.g., argument, presentation, writing mechanics etc.), and explains reasons why you feel the grade should be changed. Please refer to any class materials that support your rationale for a change. • Submit along with grade appeal a copy of your graded assignment in question (e.g., presentation feedback form, paper, etc.) and any additional evidence to support your claims. • I will decide within 7 days whether to change or uphold the grade. I will provide you with a written justification of my decision. • Grade appeals will not be considered after that “statute of limitations” has expired. Netiquette: Think about how you communicate to your instructors and colleagues in person and via e-mail. - When sending E-Mails: o Address me professionally in e-mails (ex: “Dear Dr. Wazir-Staubmann) o In an e-mail, please sign your name (I might think [email protected] is spam and delete it). Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -4- Check your grammar. Remember tone is harder to make out in e-mail. Assume a polite and professional tone, and my response will be the same. o Make sure to include any necessary background information needed for me to “make sense” of what you are e-mailing about. Also, make sure to be clear (just like in an essay) of what you want out of the e-mail. o Do not text me from your phone in all caps, or in broken English. Always use proper punctuation, complete spellings, etc... o Courtesy in this class gives most people 24 hours to respond to e-mail. I will not assume you will get an e-mail in less time; don’t assume I will either. Weekends may take longer. o If you fail to follow these guidelines, I will not answer your e-mail. This is a professional atmosphere. It has long been stated that the habits you cultivate in college shape your early years in your career. Treat others with respect. If you disagree with a colleague or an instructor, remember to frame yourself professionally and courteously. You will be responded to in kind. That said, if you disrespect a fellow classmate or myself, I may ask you to leave class indefinitely. o o - - Things That You Should Not Ask Me (and consequently I will not answer in class, via email, or in person) . 1) Q: Is there anything important in class that I’m missing/will miss? (Or any variation of this sentiment). A: (VERY disapproving look) . 2) Q: Can I meet with you so that you can talk to me about the lecture I missed? A: No. Check Blackboard. Phone a friend. It is your responsibility to make sure you complete assignments from the day(s) you missed. Before you come to me, please check with at least two colleagues. Assignments are usually online. . 3) Q: May I turn something in late? A: Late work is not accepted in this course. . 4) Q: May I redo my presentation/paper/project? A: No. . 5) Q: My friend in this class got an A, why didn’t I? A: I do not discuss students’ grades with anyone other than that student. Therefore, I will not discuss that student’s grade with you. I can discuss your grade, what you thought you did right, could’ve done better and how to improve your grade in the future. . 6) Q: Here is a note saying I visited the health center and missed my performance. May I make my performance up? A: No. For missed exams or presentations, your note must be from a doctor saying that you were too ill to attend class. A visit verification is not enough. . 7) Q: Can we postpone the performance/projects/papers? A: No. You have the entire syllabus plus all sets of directions from week one. Please balance and plan accordingly. . 8) Q: I forgot to put my name on my paper/assignment. May I still get credit? A: No. . 9) Q: What’s going to be on the quizzes? A: Information from your lecture, discussion, readings, and debates. . 10) Q: “Is this (insert particular concept) going to be on the test?” A: I promise you that this will be on the test of life. . 11) Q: I’ve improved dramatically throughout the course. My improvement deserves an ‘A’ in this course. A: Great, but your final grade is a culmination of all your points added up, Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -5- . including the points you earned at the beginning when you were still working on perfecting your skills. There is no additional curve. 12) Q: It is the end of the semester, I feel like I have put forth good effort. Can’t you just “bump” my grade to a “B”? A: No. I do not “bump” grades in this course. If you are worried about your grade then you need to be responsible for yourself and for your points throughout the semester, starting in the beginning. WEEKLY SCHEDULE Weekly Schedule IMPORTANT NOTE: There will be graded in-class debates almost every Thursday. The subjects of the debates are tentative and most certainly will change. Be prepared for short-term preparation. 1-1 Introductions Nature of Argumentation – Course Overview Create a 60 second commercial persuading your classmates why you would be a good team member during this class Write 3 possible debate topics that would interest you (upload) Materials to Prepare Week 1: Freeley & Steinberg Ch. 1-3; Cavender & Kahane, Ch 1-2 1-2 Basic Concepts & Conventions – ]Activity: - STUDENTS GIVE A SHORT, SPONTANEOUS SPEECH AGREEING WITH OR DISAGREEING WITH A CHOSEN TOPIC STATEMENT. - STUDENTS WILL CAST BALLOTS AT THE END FOR WHO DID THE BEST JOB AND WHY Outline of a debate: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE, NATURE OF CROSS-EXAMINATION, ROLE OF THE JUDGE/CRITIC/AUDIENCE, HOW SHOULD PARTNERS WORK TOGETHER, ETC. Presumption & Audiences 2-1 Propositions – Types of debate propositions, analyzing the proposition Writing Propositions Factual Propositions: Advocating and Opposing Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -6- Value Propositions: Advocating and Opposing Use of religion Policy Propositions: Advocating and Opposing Impromptu Speeches Materials to Prepare Week 2: Freeley & Steinberg Ch. 6-7 2-2 Persuasive speeches 3-1 Parts of an argument Toulmin Model Grounds- Warrant- Claim - Evidence MANIPULATING EVIDENCE TO BUILD AN AFFIRMATIVE CASE. HOW TO ATTACK AN AFFIRMATIVE CASE BY USING EVIDENCED AND LOGICAL ARGUMENTS HOW ATTACK ON THE AFFIRMATIVE CASE CAN INFLUENCE THE DECISION IN THE DEBATE. Reasoning with your audience Materials to Prepare Week 3: Freeley & Steinberg Ch. 8-10 3-2 Debate Activity: - Russel Brand - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bKQXmvdr8o#t=617 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v5WlY8Uf5U - Jon Stewart vs O’Reilly. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pmr3XvaoVW4 Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -7- 4-1 Reasoning Materials to Prepare Week 4: Canvender & Kahane Ch. 3-5 4-2 5-1 Materials to Prepare Week 5: Freeley Ch.11-15 5-2 Lincoln-Douglas Debates Policy 6-1 Lincoln-Douglas Debates Policy 6-2 Impromptu 7-1 Impromptu 7-2 Class Debate Topic: IMPROMTU DEBATE (Students will receive debate topic 10 minutes before debate) 8-1 FINAL EXAM Preparation 8-2 FINAL EXAM - ORAL CLASS DEBATE PUBLIC / EVENING General Information Pertaining to Debate Assignments Debate assignments will require four important steps: 1) Gathering appropriate information on your debate topic 2) Meeting with your partner outside of class to prepare your assigned position for the topic (team debates only) 3) Preparing a brief 4) Rehearsing your arguments before the day of your debate Your grade for each debate will be based primarily on your research, organization and delivery of the topic and position you are assigned. The format for the debates will be described in class and through supplemental reading material. If your partner flakes on your assigned date, you will have to debate by yourself. Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -8- Each debate will require you to speak extemporaneously with a brief. You must bring two briefs to class on the day you speak. You will give one to me prior to the debate and will use the second copy to deliver your arguments. The use of complete source citations is a critical element of a welldeveloped argument. Each debate will require a minimum number of sources. Full credit will only be given for stating complete source citations orally while delivering your argument. Because you are speaking to a college audience, it is also expected that you will use credible sources. Information from teen magazines, tabloids and websites produced by extremists, bigots, or idiots must be avoided. *You must speak on the day you have been assigned. If you miss class on a day you have been assigned to speak without a valid, documented excuse, you will receive 0 points for the assignment. If you show up on the day you are assigned to debate without a brief, you will receive 0 points for the speech. Tolerance In this class there may be times when you disagree with opinions being expressed. It is important that you respond to these opinions in an appropriate, respectful and professional manner. Healthy disagreement and discussion are a central component of this class and are encouraged, but must be done so on a professional and constructive basis. Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at -9- UNIVERSITY POLICIES Students are required to inform themselves of WUV academic policies. A full list of these policies is available on the WUV website: http://webster.ac.at/academic-policies Academic Honesty & Cheating: The University is committed to high standards of academic honesty. Students will be held responsible for violations of these standards. A special Honor Code that the Vienna Student Council has developed applies to students and faculty. Any student found cheating on any part of the course work (homework assignment, term paper, quiz, exam, etc.) will automatically be given an “F” for the course. Any student found to be helping another student to cheat will likewise be given an “F” for the course. In each case, the student will also be put on disciplinary probation for the remainder of her or his stay at Webster. If the student is found to have engaged in cheating a second time, s/he will be automatically expelled from the University. Faculty members are held responsible for upholding and enforcing the Honor Code. Academic Work: Students are required to save digital or hard-copy files of any and all materials they use for any assignment in any WUV course. Upon the instructor's request they have to provide complete text documentation for any sources they have used. In every case, should the assignment or project be shared outside the academic department, the student's name and all identifying information about that student will be redacted from the assignment or project. Contact Hours: Graduate courses are only offered in an 8- week term format and meet 1-time per week for 4 hours. Graduate Mid-term and final exams sessions are scheduled in 2-hour block sessions in addition to weekly class meeting times (36 total contact hours). Please see the Graduate Course Schedule/Timetable on the website for specific exam dates/times: http://webster.ac.at/graduate-courseofferings-and-schedules Undergraduate courses are offered either in term format, which meets for two 2-hour sessions per week for 8 consecutive weeks (32 contact hours), or a 15-week semester format, which meets for two 1.5 – hour sessions for 8 consecutive weeks followed by a break week (no classes are held) and then for another 7 consecutive weeks. The total number of contact hours for undergraduate semester courses is thus 45. Attendance: Students are expected to attend all class sessions of this course. In the case of unavoidable absence, the student must contact the instructor and provide written documentation. The student is subject to appropriate academic penalty for incomplete or unacceptable makeup work, or for excessive or unexcused absences. Excused absences—based on submitted documentation—must not exceed: Four class sessions when the course meets twice a week; Two class sessions when the course meets only once a week. Should the number of excused absences be higher, it is the student's responsibility to withdraw from the course. In the case of unexcused absences, amounting to: Four class sessions when the course meets twice a week; Two class sessions when the course meets only once a week; the instructor must lower the student's grade by one letter grade and inform the student of the action. Should the number of unexcused absences be higher, the instructor must assign the grade of F and inform the student of the action. Note: In the case of a mixture of excused and unexcused absences, the instructor’s response must be based on the dominant category. Student Conduct: Since every student is entitled to full participation in class or exams without interruption, disruption of class by inconsiderate behavior is not acceptable. Students are expected to treat the instructor and other students with dignity and respect, especially in cases where a diversity of opinion arises. Students who engage in disruptive behavior are subject to disciplinary action, including removal from the course. All and any use of a cell phone is strictly prohibited during class. Students using a cell phone may be sent out of the classroom, which may result in an unexcused absence. If a calculator is needed in any class, the student must bring a calculator—and not a cell phone. It is up to the individual instructor to rule on the use of laptops or I-pads. Instructors have the right to prohibit students’ use of such electronic devices. Palais Wenkheim, Praterstrasse 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria - www.webster.ac.at - 10 -
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz