Standardized Definitions for Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint

Standardized Definitions for Cardiovascular
and Stroke Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials
CSRC and MDEpiNet Thinktank Meeting
Washington, D.C.
Friday, March 11, 2016
Karen A. Hicks, MD
Medical Officer
Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products (DCaRP),
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER),
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
On behalf of the Standardized Data Collection for
Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (SCTI)
1
Disclosure Slide
The opinions expressed here are my own.
2
Background
 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs
Advisory Committee (July 2008)
 Diabetes Cardiovascular Guidance
(December 2008)
 Advisory Committee Meetings
(April 2009)
3
July 2008 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs
Advisory Committee
 Discussed the role of cardiovascular assessment in
the pre- and post-approval settings for drugs and
biologics developed for the treatment of Type 2 DM
 Voted (14 “Yes,” 2 “No”) to require sponsors to either
 conduct a long-term cardiovascular trial if an anti-diabetic
therapy did not demonstrate a concerning cardiovascular
(CV) safety signal during Phase 2/3 development
OR
 provide other equivalent evidence to rule out an
unacceptable CV risk
4
Diabetes Cardiovascular Guidance - 1
 Final guidance published in December 2008
 Guidance for Industry: “Diabetes Mellitus—
Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk in New Antidiabetic
Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes”
 Identifies HbA1c as the primary efficacy
endpoint for glucose reduction
 Asks sponsors to demonstrate that new type 2
diabetes agents do not increase cardiovascular
risk unacceptably
5
Diabetes Cardiovascular Guidance - 2
 Recommends that
 Independent Committee prospectively and blindly
adjudicates major cardiovascular events
 Phase 2/3 designs permit a pre-specified metaanalysis of major cardiovascular events
 Trials include patients at increased risk for
cardiovascular disease
 Trial duration(s) exceed 6 months to ensure a
sufficient number of events and to provide longterm data
6
Diabetes Cardiovascular Guidance - 3
UPPER BOUND OF 95% CI
FOR RISK RATIO
CONCLUSION
>1.8
Inadequate to support approval
>1.3 but <1.8*
Postmarketing trial(s) needed to
show definitively <1.3
<1.3*
Postmarketing cardiovascular
trial(s) generally not necessary
CI=confidence interval
*with a reassuring point estimate
7
Advisory Committee Meetings
(April 2009)
 Cardiovascular events had not been
predefined or adjudicated during study
conduct
 Risk estimates for MACE identified through a
post-hoc selection of PTs in MedDRA and
SMQs
 Patient population was not enriched for
elevated CV risk (events were sparse)
 Missing data (key data elements never
8
collected)
Why Data Standards?
 To improve the quality and efficiency of
cardiovascular trials
 To provide endpoint definitions so that
events are clearly characterized by objective
criteria and reported uniformly
 To standardize data collection to capture key
data elements
 To simplify analysis of events in drug
development programs or among different
clinical trials and to more easily identify
trends and other safety signals
9
SCTI - Goals
 To create uniform definitions and data
standards for key cardiovascular and
stroke endpoint events in clinical trials
 CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange
Standards Consortium)
 Study
Data Tabulation Model (SDTM)
 To create a FDA Data Warehouse of
Clinical Trials
10
Definitions
 Cardiovascular Death
 Non-Cardiovascular Death
 Undetermined Cause of Death
 Myocardial Infarction (Universal Definition)
 Hospitalization for Unstable Angina
 Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack
 Heart Failure Event
 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
 Peripheral Vascular Intervention
 Stent Thrombosis
11
Timeline
2008
2009
July 1-2, 2008:
Endocrinologic &
Metabolic Drugs
Advisory Committee
March 2009:
First Draft of CV and
Stroke Endpoint
Definitions (FDA)
December 2008:
FDA’s Diabetes
Cardiovascular
Guidance
April 2009: (2)
Endocrinologic &
Metabolic Drugs
Advisory
Committee
Meetings
July 2009:
Draft CV and Stroke
Endpoint Definitions
released to PhRMA
September 11, 2009:
SCTI Meets at FDA
for First Public
Meeting
2010 - 2012
2013 - 2015
February 5, 2010:
SCTI Working Group
Meeting
Adjudication of
Clinical Events and
FDA’s Analysis of
Results
March 26, 2010:
SCTI Public Meeting
November 17, 2010 –
January 31, 2011:
Definitions posted
on CDISC Website
for Public Review
March 28, 2011:
SCTI Working Group
Meeting
February 12, 2012:
SAP and Definitions
for Testing
FDA Internal Meetings
March - April 2014:
Data Standards
posted on ACC/AHA
website for Public
Review
December 29, 2014:
Data Standards
paper published
electronically
July 28, 2015:
Data Standards
white paper
published
2016
January 19,
2016:
Discussion
of CEC
Results
February 2,
2016: SCTI
Working
Group
Meeting
13
14
Future Directions
 MDEpiNet – Registries
 Electronic Health Records – Clinical Trials
15
Acknowledgements
 Stanford University School of Medicine (Dr. Ken Mahaffey)
 Mount Sinai School of Medicine (Drs. Roxana Mehran,
Mike Domanski)
 Cleveland Clinic (Drs. Steve Nissen, Mike Lincoff)
 Duke Clinical Research Institute (Dr. James Tcheng)
Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr. C. Michael Gibson)
 Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Drs. Scott Solomon,
Akshay Desai, Eldrin Foster Lewis, Marc Pfeffer,
John McMurray (Glasgow,Scotland))
 Case Medical Center (Dr. Cathy Sila)
 Inova Heart & Vascular Institute (Dr. Chris O’Connor)
 Harvard Clinical Research Institute (Drs. Don Cutlip,
Laura Mauri)
 San Francisco VA Medical Center (Dr. John Teerlink)
 Scripps Translational Science Institute (Dr. Steve Steinhubl)
 St. Louis University (Dr. Bernard Chaitman)
 TIMI (Drs. Steve Wiviott, David Morrow, Ben Scirica)
 Yale University School of Medicine (Dr. Alexandra Lansky)
16
Acknowledgements















Robert Temple, M.D. (CDER)
Ellis Unger, M.D. (ODE-I)
Norman Stockbridge, M.D., Ph.D., Shari Targum, M.D., Ana Szarfman, M.D.,
Ph.D., Jay Levine (DCaRP)
Jim Hung, Ph.D., John Lawrence, Ph.D., Steve Bai, Ph.D. (Division of
Biometrics I)
Andrew Farb, M.D., Bram Zuckerman, M.D., Steve Brooks, M.D., Ken
Cavanaugh, M.D. (CDRH)
Mary Parks, M.D. (ODE-II)
Hylton Joffe, M.D., M.M.Sc (DBRUP), Ilan Irony, M.D. (CBER), Leonard Sacks,
M.D. (OMP)
Rachel Hartford, RPM (DMEP)/Lori Wachter, RN, BSN, OCN Project Manager
(DCaRP)/ Anna Park, R.Ph Project Manager (DCaRP))
FDA Stroke Team (Billy Dunn, M.D., John Marler, M.D., Heather Fitter, M.D.,
Kachikwu Illoh, M.D.)
CDISC
Health Level 7
Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI)
Critical Path / Data Standards
Association of Clinical Research Organizations
Industry (Paul Burton, M.D., Yale Mitchel, M.D.)
17
Standardized Data Collection
for Clinical Trials
Now Here
Coming Soon
18
Draft Definitions
http:///www.cdisc.org/system/files/all/sta
ndard/Draft%20Definitions%20for%20CDI
SC%20August%2020%2C%202014.pdf
http:///www.cdisc.org/therapeutic
19
Data Standards
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0735109714074841/
1-s2.0-S0735109714074841main.pdf?_tid=180e3f72-e64b-11e5-831c00000aacb35d&acdnat=1457564770_57f858
d9a29b75d5a4fe86038b24be2f
20
Thank you
21