Which of the following categories best
describes your involvement with WWW2014?
Speaker (Paper, Poster, Tutorial, Workshop)
Attendee
Student
Committee Member
Volunteer
Exhibitor
Invited Guest
Media
#Resp
123
39
26
13
7
5
2
1
%Resp
56.94
18.06
12.04
6.02
3.24
2.31
0.93
0.46
Speaker (Paper, Poster, Tutorial, Workshop) A6endee Student Commi6ee Member Volunteer Exhibitor Invited Guest Media Which of the following categories did you
select for your registration?
Full Pass
3-day Pass
5-day Pass
1-day Pass
Workshops & Tutorials
W4A
Exhibitor
#Resp
93
45
44
11
10
9
4
216
%Resp
43.06
20.83
20.37
5.09
4.63
4.17
1.85
Full Pass 3-­‐day Pass 5-­‐day Pass 1-­‐day Pass Workshops & Tutorials W4A Exhibitor How did you
register?
Early-bird Online
Normal Online
On-site
#Resp
163
45
7
%Resp
75.46
20.83
3.24
Early-­‐bird Online Normal Online On-­‐site What were the major reason(s) you decided
to attend WWW2014
Papers
Professional networking opportunities
Opportunity to socialise with Web
researchers/developers
Workshops
The conference city
Keynotes
Tutorials
Posters
#Resp
%Participants
144
93
66.67
43.06
84
77
37
36
25
17
513
38.89
35.65
17.13
16.67
11.57
7.87
Other responses
We were bidding to host www2017
To speak
2
The websci track was appealing
recommend my prof.
Meeting Tim Berners-Lee
1
1
1
I received a Google Student Award
Exposure to new tech ideas
Developer Track
committee member for W4A
1
1
1
1
Papers Professional networking opportuni2es Opportunity to socialise with Web researchers/developers Workshops The conference city Keynotes Tutorials Posters Approximately how many weeks before
the conference did you decided that
you would attend?
≤12 weeks
≤24 weeks
≤4 weeks
≤52 weeks
paper acceptance
early bird
>52 weeks
wks acceptance
#Resp
%Resp
123
37
24
12
5
2
1
1
205
60.00
18.05
11.71
5.85
2.44
0.98
0.49
0.49
≤12 weeks ≤24 weeks ≤4 weeks ≤52 weeks paper acceptance early bird >52 weeks wks acceptance How did you find out about
WWW2014?
The WWW2014 Web site
From a colleague
An email list
The booth at WWW2013
Details on another Web site
A Twitter post
The IW3C2 Web site
#Resp
%Participants
98
85
40
27
8
7
4
269
Other responses
It's a big Conference. Everyone
Previous attendee
5
5
Already knew.
I had a paper at www13
A regular attendee
From my advisor
my son who chaired a session
5
4
3
3
2
Best conference in the field
college
Committee planning
It just happens!
Looking at DBLP
Luz Rello sent out an email about
scheduled submission
WikiCFP
WWW2013 ceremony
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
45.37
39.35
18.52
12.50
3.70
3.24
1.85
The WWW2014 Web site From a colleague An email list The booth at WWW2013 Details on another Web site A Twi<er post The IW3C2 Web site Did the conference Web site provide all the details you needed
to know about the conference before you registered?
Yes
No
#Resp
183
27
%Resp
87.14
12.86
Yes No The schedule wasn't
The website for WW
elements (making it
The workshops prog
There was no prope
There was very little
presentation was go
Further, other confer
and WWW does not
so that they can prep
When submitting my
WWW2014 chair an
made me spend a d
point.
(Google translate fro
wonder how big data
time or real-time whe
check) can be used
If not, what did you find missing?
finding papers and session times was very badly done on the website. the only way
i could find to find the slot an author was in was to open the HTML source of the
program page and do a text search for the name there (because all names were
hidden in tags that needed to be expanded via javascript).
Many of the details of registration and exhibitor details were not on the site, but I
was able to get these from the organizers easily over email.
Visa info was poor
Could have provided more housing imfo for students. Like dorms amd stuff. Lot of
people felt that was missing.
For the most part, yes. However, the site itself was difficult to navigate (especially on
mobile); and could have used a better scheduling functoin.
Full schedule prior to close of early registration.
good information about hotels and proximity to city and transportation options
I couldn't check the schedule and detail information about sessions.
I found the information about hotels a little disorganized. There were many hotels,
but it was not clear what the transportation options were to the conference venue.
i'm aware there was some sort of mobile app for navigating the program, but solid
functionality for that should be on the website, too. it's the main purpose of the
website, in my eyes.
Information was there, but too late.
It was not clear to me when registering, whether I could register as a student when
presenting a poster. Since the student discount is not always appplicable for
authors, this information was required before registering. Fortunately, a simple email
with a quick response solved it.
It would be useful to have information about external company events that take
place during the conference days (ex: Google, Microsoft, &Yahoo parties)"
mobile browser was bad.
More schedule information would have been helpful prior to registration
Program details to decide when to arrive and leave.
Program info was terrible"
some problem with in Safari browser.
The 2014 website was appalling in terms of web accessibility, and the registration
process was straight out of the late 90's.
The program did not go up until very late.
The program schedule came very late
The schedule wasn't available until after early-bird registration closed.
The website for WWW2014 was unusually hard to navigate. Way too many picture
elements (making it hard to search) and problematic information architecture.
The workshops program was finalized quite later.
There was no proper information regarding W3C tutorial.
There was very little information available to speakers about how long their
presentation was going to be, and what the usual split of talk vs questions was.
Further, other conferences require putting slides on a common computer at times,
and WWW does not. It would be good to clarify these details for the speakers early
so that they can prepare the talks accordingly.
When submitting my poster to WWW2014, there were two information sources - the
WWW2014 chair and the publisher. Their notifications are not synchronized and it
made me spend a day finding a specific personal key which was not issued at that
point.
(Google translate fro Korean) Big data, whether emotional or medical triangulation
wonder how big data analysis is statistically more business, but it sseuyineunji (realtime or real-time when you choose what you want in the same business for a health
check) can be used no wonder
How many nights
did you stay in
Seoul on your
WWW2014 trip?
7 days
6 days
>7 days
5 days
4 days
3 days
2 days
1 day
#Resp
54
43
36
28
26
11
8
4
210
%Resp
25.71
20.48
17.14
13.33
12.38
5.24
3.81
1.90
7 days 6 days >7 days 5 days 4 days 3 days 2 days 1 day What price range
(per night) did you
prefer for your stay?
Less than USD 180
USD 180~USD 200
USD 200~USD 230
USD 230~USD 250
USD 250~USD 280
More than USD 280
#Resp
141
33
22
5
5
3
209
%Resp
67.46
15.79
10.53
2.39
2.39
1.44
Less than USD 180 USD 180~USD 200 USD 200~USD 230 USD 230~USD 250 USD 250~USD 280 More than USD 280 How did you reserve
your
accommodation?
Web search
Directly to Hotel
WWW2014 Website
#Resp
106
64
37
207
%Resp
51.21
30.92
17.87
Web search Directly to Hotel WWW2014 Website How far from the conference venue was
your accommodation?
Within a short walk
Required use of metro or bus
The conference hotel
#Resp
126
59
24
209
%Resp
60.29
28.23
11.48
Within a short walk Required use of metro or bus The conference hotel Identify the track(s), up
to three, which you
considered the most
interesting?
Research Track
Workshops
Web Science Track
Industry Track
Developers Track
Tutorials
Poster Track
Demos Track
W3C Track
PhD Consortium
#Resp
161
82
56
46
43
42
38
23
16
10
%Resp
74.54
37.96
25.93
21.30
19.91
19.44
17.59
10.65
7.41
4.63
Research Track Workshops Web Science Track Industry Track Developers Track Tutorials Poster Track Demos Track W3C Track PhD Consor>um Did you attend any
of the tutorials or
workshops offered
at WWW2014?
Yes
No
#Resp
132
83
215
%Resp
61.40
38.60
Yes No If yes, which workshop/tutorial session was
most useful to you?
Linked Data on the Web
Social Recommender Systems (SRS2014)
Big Graph Mining
Social News On the Web
The Theory and Practice of Social Machines
Connecting Online & Offline Life
Data Extraction and Object Search
Large Scale Network Anaysis (LSNA)
Web APIs and RESTful Design
Public Health in a Digital Age
Web-based Education Technologies (WebET
2014)
Modeling Social Media: Mining Big Data in Social
Media and the Web (MSM 2014)
WebQuality
Making Sense of Microposts
W4A
Web Science track
International Web Observatory Workshop
(WOW2014)
Simplifying Complex Networks for Practitioners
Temporal Web Analytics Workshop (TempWeb)
International Web Observatory Workshop
(WOW2014)
Web Intelligence and Communities Workshop
(WI&C 2014)
Big Scholarly Data: Towards the Web of Scholars
#Resp
%Resp
13
12
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
10.16
9.38
6.25
6.25
6.25
5.47
5.47
5.47
5.47
4.69
5
3.91
4
4
3
3
3
3.13
3.13
2.34
2.34
2.34
3
2
2
2.34
1.56
1.56
2
1.56
2
1
117
1.56
0.78
91.41
Linked Data on the Web Social Recommender Systems (SRS2014) Big Graph Mining Social News On the Web The Theory and PracGce of Social Machines ConnecGng Online & Offline Life Data ExtracGon and Object Search Large Scale Network Anaysis (LSNA) Web APIs and RESTful Design Public Health in a Digital Age Web-­‐based EducaGon Technologies (WebET 2014) Modeling Social Media: Mining Big Data in Social Media and the Web (MSM 2014) WebQuality Making Sense of Microposts W4A Web Science track InternaGonal Web Observatory Workshop (WOW2014) Simplifying Complex Networks for PracGGoners Temporal Web AnalyGcs Workshop (TempWeb) InternaGonal Web Observatory Workshop (WOW2014) Web Intelligence and CommuniGes Workshop (WI&C 2014) Big Scholarly Data: Towards the Web of Scholars If yes, which workshop/tutorial
session was most useful to you?
Entity Resolution in the Web of Data
tutorial
Social Spam, Campaigns, Misinformation
and Crowdturfing tutorial
Concept level sentiment analysis tutorial
Computational Models for Social
Influence Analysis tutorial
Event Detection and Description for
Microblogs tutorial
HTML5 tutorial
Mobile Semantic Web tutorial
E-commerce product search tutorial
Online Learning and Linked Data tutorial
Semantic Web and Linked Data tutorial
#Resp
%Resp
4
3.13
4
3
3.13
2.34
2
1.56
2
2
2
1
1
1
22
1.56
1.56
1.56
0.78
0.78
0.78
17.19
En#ty Resolu#on in the Web of Data tutorial Social Spam, Campaigns, Misinforma#on and Crowdturfing tutorial Concept level sen#ment analysis tutorial Computa#onal Models for Social Influence Analysis tutorial Event Detec#on and Descrip#on for Microblogs tutorial HTML5 tutorial Mobile Seman#c Web tutorial E-­‐commerce product search tutorial Online Learning and Linked Data tutorial How do you rate the
tutorials and
workshops?
3/4
4/4
2/4
average approval
#Resp
%Resp
86
61
10
3.32
54.43
38.61
6.33
3 / 4 4 / 4 2 / 4 Did you attend any
of the poster
sessions at
WWW2014?
Yes
No
#Resp
154
54
208
%Resp
74.04
25.96
Yes No How would you like to see the poster
session organized in future WWW
conference?
A subset of posters each day
All posters everyday
All posters on one day
Do not know
No posters at all
#Resp
74
59
40
11
2
186
%Resp
39.57
31.55
21.39
5.88
1.07
A subset of posters each day All posters everyday All posters on one day Do not know No posters at all How do you rate the
poster session?
3/4
4/4
2/4
1/4
average approval
#Resp
87
44
31
9
2.84
%Resp
50.88
25.73
18.13
5.26
3 / 4 4 / 4 2 / 4 1 / 4 Did you attend the co-located event,
BigData Innovators Gathering (BIG)
2014? Then, how do you rate the
event?
3/4
2/4
4/4
1/4
average approval
#Resp
33
13
10
2
2.88
%Resp
How do you rate the
exhibits?
3/4
2/4
4/4
1/4
average approval
#Resp
62
33
21
8
2.77
%Resp
50.00
26.61
16.94
6.45
3 / 4 2 / 4 4 / 4 1 / 4 How many times have you
attended WWW conferences
before?
Once
2 times
More than 5 times
3 times
4 times
5 times
#Resp
84
20
17
8
7
4
140
%Resp
60.00
14.29
12.14
5.71
5.00
2.86
Once 2 'mes More than 5 'mes 3 'mes 4 'mes 5 'mes If WWW2014
was your
first WWW
conference,
did you like
the format?
No
Yes
#Resp
5
117
122
%Resp
4.10
95.90
No Yes Did you get any useful details
from the pre-conference material
and the staff at the WWW2015
booth?
Obtained some useful information
Did not visit the booth
Obtained lots of useful information
No useful information obtained
#Resp
86
52
30
21
189
%Resp
45.50
27.51
15.87
11.11
Obtained some useful informa1on Did not visit the booth Obtained lots of useful informa1on No useful informa1on obtained Are you planning to
attend WWW2015 in
Florence, Italy?
Maybe
Probably will
Definitely will
Probably not
Definitely not
#Resp
98
65
25
16
1
205
%Resp
47.80
31.71
12.20
7.80
0.49
Maybe Probably will Definitely will Probably not Definitely not Are you planning to bring
spouse, partner, or family
members along?
No
Do not know
Yes
#Resp
84
81
38
203
%Resp
41.38
39.90
18.72
No Do not know Yes Primary job responsibility
Researcher
Developer
Engineer
Manager
#Resp
% Participants
168
84
36
18
21
10.5
20
10
245
Researcher Developer Engineer Manager