Influenza Vaccine Production Impact of technology, scale and other

Influenza Vaccine Production
Impact of technology, scale and other
vaccines on financial viability
Martin Friede
World Health Organization
Investment and time to production for 20M
dose/yr (on an existing vaccine campus)
Investment required
(US$ millions)
1000
IIV
Tissue Culture
100
IIV
Egg
10
LAIV
Egg
1
0
2
4
6
Years
2|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
8
10
12
Investment and time to production for 20M
dose/yr (on an existing vaccine campus)
Investment required
(US$ millions)
1000
IIV
Tissue Culture
100
IIV
Egg
10
Cost per
Dose
LAIV
Egg
1
Market
0
2
4
6
Years
3|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
8
10
12
Investment and time to production for 20M
dose/yr (on an existing vaccine campus)
1000
Investment required
(US$ millions)
?
IIV
Tissue Culture
100
?
IIV
Egg
10
New vaccine
technologies ?
LAIV
Egg
1
?
?
0
2
4
6
Years
4|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
8
10
12
Where are the costs ?
CAPEX (approx: for 20M dose IIV facility)
Offices
$ 4M
Pilot
$5M
Bulk 1
$ 20M
Water
$ 1M
QC
$10M
Filling
$10M
2y
packaging,
storage
$3-6M
Power
$ 2M
Waste
$ 2M
 For 1 vaccine: ~$60 M ($60M/product) =~$3/dose capacity
5|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Where are the costs ?
CAPEX (approx: for 20M dose IIV facility)
Offices
$ 4M
Pilot
$5M
Bulk 1
$ 20M
Water
$ 1M
Bulk 2
$ 20M
Power
$ 2M
Bulk 3
$ 20M
Waste
$ 2M
Bulk 4
$ 20M
QC
$10M
Filling
$10M
Lyo
Lyo
$10M
$10M
2y
packaging,
storage
$3-6M
 For 1 vaccine: ~$60 M ($60M/product) =~$3/dose capacity
 For 4 vaccines: ~$120M ($30M/product) = ~$1.5/dose capacity
6|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
CAPEX: 2M vs 20M dose facility
Offices
$ 4M
Pilot
$5M
Bulk 1
$ 10M
Water
$ 1M
QC
$4M
Filling
$3M
2y
packaging,
storage
$2M
Power
$ 2M
Waste
$ 2M
 2M dose facility: ~$30 M =~$15/dose capacity
 20M dose facility: ~$60M =~$3/dose capacity
7|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
R&D and OPEX: egg derived IIV
 R&D costs for egg-derived seasonal IIV
– Preclin, phase I, II, III adult, phase I, II, III children: $3-15M
– Qualification and validation of equipment: $2-3M
 OPEX
– Variable costs:
• Supplies: clean fertilised eggs or flock plus chicken feed (12 months).
– @$1/egg
– If yield ~45ugHA/egg = $1/dose.
– If yield ~22ug HA/egg = $2/dose
• Diafiltration disposables, filters, sucrose, vials / syringes …etc.
– Fixed costs: Labor, overheads.
8|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Labor costs
 Highly variable from country-to-country.
 For influenza vaccine labor only needed for 4-5
months/year.
– Pay staff to do nothing rest of year
– Make N- and S-hemisphere influenza vaccine
– Make other vaccines rest of year
9|
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Cash-flow spread sheet
(hypothetical costs !! Egg based IIV)
doses (1000)
Materials
Labor
Indirect costs
single vaccine facility
2M/yr
20M/yr
2000
20000
%
%
4000
31
40000 65
4000
31
10000 16
2000
6000
4 vaccine facility
2M/yr
20M/yr
2000
20000
%
%
4000
44
40000 81
1333
15
3333 7
1000
3000
Total costs
10000
56000
6333
46333
CAPEX (pro rata for influenza)
Depreciation (10 yr linear)
30000
3000
60000
6000
27000
2700
30000
3000
Outflow
Outflow/dose (cost)
13000
6.5
62000
3.1
9033
4.5
49333
2.5
10 |
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Impact of high variable costs
 CAPEX and R&D contribution per dose less critical than
for other vaccines
– Limits benefit of 'push' support
 Critical impact of yield, cost of egg..
 Critical impact of packaging and overfill
– 10 dose vial << 1 dose vial (60% overfill) ~< prefilled syringe
11 |
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Seasonal Influenza Purchase and
costs by region
Survey 2011
Region
Number of
countries
responded
Doses purchased
2008-2009
2009-2010
Costs/dose (USD)
Range
Average
PAHO
23
60,445,643
71,786,028
2.0 - 7.0 $
3.4
EMRO
8
1,438,000
1,359,000
2.0- 5.5 $
4.2
SEARO
1
2,200,000
2,400,000
5.9 - 7.3$
6.0
WPRO
8
11,857,860
11,056,420
6.9 - 11.0$
9.4
Total
40
75,941,503
86,601,448
2.0 - 11.0 $
5.8
12 |
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
Conclusions
 There is economy in scale.
– A large manufacturing facility more viable than a small facility, but requires large
market.
 A small facility more viable if labor/infrastructure costs shared across
several products
– Need to identify other vaccine products that are sustainable
 Seasonality critical ! Supply of raw materials, labor, etc.
 Investment and Cost/dose for LAIV much lower than IIV
– But market may also be lower
 Investment for tissue-culture IIV higher than for egg IIV
– Very large-scale required to be economically competitive
13 |
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013
13
Inference
 Each manufacturer should establish a cash-flow
model using local costs and predicted market to
identify optimal production model
 Local production can be an issue of national
security, and may justify local procurement at a
higher price than international tender.
– Cash-flow modeling will provide an indication of subsidies
that will be needed.
14 |
WHO-HHS Meeting on Business Models, DC, Jan 2013