J Appl Physiol 101: 918 –925, 2006. First published April 20, 2006; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01534.2005. Effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, metabolism, and short-term endurance performance Johann Edge, David Bishop, and Carmel Goodman School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Submitted 6 December 2005; accepted in final form 8 March 2006 alkalosis; lactate threshold; time to fatigue INTENSE MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS result in large ionic changes and an increased nonmitochondrial ATP turnover, contributing to the accumulation of hydrogen ions (H⫹). Whereas recent findings indicate that the role of H⫹ accumulation during the fatigue process of mammalian muscle fibers may be limited (36), the accumulation of H⫹ has been shown to affect oxidative phosphorylation, enzyme activity, and ion regulation during some exercise tasks (i.e., repeated, intense muscle contractions) (18, 27, 41, 43). Both intra- and extracellular buffer systems act to reduce the buildup of H⫹ and therefore aid in the regulation of intracellular pH (pHi). An increased muscle buffer capacity (m) after training may improve exercise performance by preventing a large drop in pHi during intense muscle contractions; however, little is known about the stimulus required to improve m. Despite the limited research, it appears that the intensity of training is an important stimulus to increase m. In support of Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Bishop, School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]). 918 this hypothesis, changes in m were reported to be greater after high-intensity training than moderate-intensity training matched for total work (kJ) (16). Others have also shown a greater m in sprint-trained athletes and those participating in high-intensity sports (rowing, team sports), than in marathon runners and untrained subjects (17, 35). However, whereas many reports have shown improvements in m after intense interval training (4, 45), some have not (21, 33). Typically, training studies that have employed short rest periods (⬃1 min) between high-intensity intervals [80 –150% peak O2 uptake (V̇O2 peak)] have reported an improved m (4, 16, 45), whereas those employing longer rest intervals (3–10 min) (21, 33) have not. Therefore, factors in addition to the intensity of exercise training may be important to effect changes in m. It has been suggested that the accumulation of H⫹ within the skeletal muscle may be an important stimulus for improving m (16). The accumulation of H⫹ within skeletal muscle during exercise depends on both the production and removal of H⫹. The production and removal rates of H⫹ are affected by the muscle’s oxidative capacity, specific transport proteins, fiber type, and the work-to-rest ratio employed during repeated exercise bouts (28, 46, 47). The H⫹ efflux out of the muscle is also reduced during extracellular acidosis and enhanced by an elevated extracellular buffer concentration (25, 34, 43). The ingestion of a buffering agent [i.e., sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) or sodium citrate] ⬃90 –120 min before exercise has subsequently been shown to reduce the accumulation of H⫹ in skeletal muscle, interstitium, and blood during repeated, intense muscle contractions (12, 39, 43). Although previously used as an ergogenic aid, ingestion of a blood-buffering agent provides a novel approach to alter the H⫹ accumulation during training and to investigate the role of H⫹ accumulation as a stimulus for changes in m. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of chronic (3 times per week for 8 wk) ingestion of NaHCO3 before training on m. Because of the possible ergogenic effects of NaHCO3 ingestion, the experimental training groups were matched for work (kJ) (supervised training program). We also measured changes in muscle metabolism, time to fatigue (TTF; at V̇O2 peak intensity), V̇O2 peak, and the lactate threshold (LT). We hypothesized that ingestion of NaHCO3 and therefore a reduction in H⫹ accumulation within the muscle and blood during training would negatively affect improvements in m. METHODS Sixteen female students (mean ⫾ SD: age 19 ⫾ 1 yr, mass 60 ⫾ 5 kg, V̇O2 peak 42.1 ⫾ 7.0 ml 䡠 kg⫺1 䡠 min⫺1), who were moderately The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 8750-7587/06 $8.00 Copyright © 2006 the American Physiological Society http://www. jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 Edge, Johann, David Bishop, and Carmel Goodman. Effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, metabolism, and short-term endurance performance. J Appl Physiol 101: 918 –925, 2006. First published April 20, 2006; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01534.2005.—This study determined the effects of altering the H⫹ concentration during interval training, by ingesting NaHCO3 (Alk-T) or a placebo (Pla-T), on changes in muscle buffer capacity (m), endurance performance, and muscle metabolites. Pre- and posttraining peak O2 uptake (V̇O2 peak), lactate threshold (LT), and time to fatigue at 100% pretraining V̇O2 peak intensity were assessed in 16 recreationally active women. Subjects were matched on the LT, were randomly placed into the Alk-T (n ⫽ 8) or Pla-T (n ⫽ 8) groups, and performed 8 wk (3 days/wk) of six to twelve 2-min cycle intervals at 140 –170% of their LT, ingesting NaHCO3 or a placebo before each training session (work matched between groups). Both groups had improvements in m (19 vs. 9%; P ⬍ 0.05) and V̇O2 peak (22 vs. 17%; P ⬍ 0.05) after the training period, with no differences between groups. There was a significant correlation between pretraining m and percent change in m (r ⫽ ⫺0.70, P ⬍ 0.05). There were greater improvements in both the LT (26 vs. 15%; P ⫽ 0.05) and time to fatigue (164 vs. 123%; P ⫽ 0.05) after Alk-T, compared with Pla-T. There were no changes to pre- or postexercise ATP, phosphocreatine, creatine, and intracellular lactate concentrations, or pHi after training. Our findings suggest that training intensity, rather than the accumulation of H⫹ during training, may be more important to improvements in m. The group ingesting NaHCO3 before each training session had larger improvements in the LT and endurance performance, possibly because of a reduced metabolic acidosis during training and a greater improvement in muscle oxidative capacity. INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY J Appl Physiol • VOL percent of V̇O2 peak (2). The subjects performed three training sessions per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) for 8 consecutive weeks. Group 1 ingested NaHCO3 (0.2 mg/kg body mass ⫻ 2) at 90 and 30 min before performing each high-intensity, interval training session (Alk-T), whereas group 2 ingested a placebo [sodium chloride (NaCl); 0.1 mg/kg body mass ⫻ 2] at 90 and 30 min before performing each high-intensity, interval training session (Pla-T). A similar NaHCO3 supplement protocol resulted in a sustained (⬃80 min of intermittent exercise) increase in blood [HCO3] ([HCO3]b) without any gastrointestinal disturbances (5). Pilot work within our laboratory also showed that there were large differences in blood pH (pHb) during interval training when this protocol of NaCO3 ingestion was compared with a placebo (Fig. 1). All training sessions were completed on mechanically braked cycle ergometers (818E, Monark, Stockholm, Sweden) and were preceded by a 5-min warm-up at 50 W. Training followed a periodized plan so as to simulate athletic training programs, allow progression, and prevent overtraining. The training was performed at an intensity of 140% (weeks 1 and 2), 150% (weeks 3 and 4), 160% (week 5), and Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 trained and involved in various club level sports (basketball, soccer, netball, rowing, and hockey), volunteered to participate in this study. Subjects were informed of the study requirements, benefits, and risks before giving written, informed consent. Approval for the study’s procedures was granted by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee. Experimental overview. All subjects completed a familiarization trial of both the graded exercise test (GXT) and TTF test before baseline testing. The GXT and TTF tests were then performed by each subject before and after the training intervention. On the day of the TTF test, a muscle biopsy was taken from the vastus lateralis muscle at rest and immediately upon cessation of the exercise test. Posttraining tests were conducted in the same order as the pretraining tests. At least 48 h separated each testing session, and pre- and posttraining tests were conducted approximately at the same time of day (⫾2 h). Subjects were asked to maintain their normal diet and prescribed training program throughout the study. They were also required to consume no food or beverages (other than water) 2 h before testing and were asked not to consume alcohol or to perform vigorous exercise in the 24 h before testing. Food diaries were given to each subject to record food and fluid consumption 2 days before each test, and subjects were asked to replicate this during posttraining testing. After the pretraining testing, subjects were matched on their LT and randomly assigned to one of the two high-intensity interval-training groups [NaHCO3 ingestion (Alk-T) or placebo (Pla-T)]. GXT. Pre- and posttraining, the GXT was performed on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Lode, Gronigen, The Netherlands) and consisted of graded exercise steps (4-min stages), using an intermittent protocol (1-min break between stages). The test commenced at 50 W, and thereafter intensity was increased by 25 W every 4 min until volitional exhaustion. The test was stopped when the subject could no longer maintain the required power output (cycling cadence dropped below 60 rpm). Strong verbal encouragement was provided to each subject as they came to the end of the test. Capillary blood samples were taken at rest and immediately after each 4-min stage of the GXT. The LT was calculated by the modified Dmax method (6). This is determined by the point on the polynomial regression curve that yields the maximal perpendicular distance to the straight line connecting the first increase in lactate concentration above resting level and the final lactate point. V̇O2 peak was determined as the highest 30-s rolling average during the GXT, and the power output at which the pretraining V̇O2 peak occurred was accordingly used in the TTF test. If a subject did not complete the 4-min stage in which V̇O2 peak occurred, then the fraction of the stage that was completed was added to the workload of the previous stage, and this was subsequently used as the power at V̇O2 peak and used for the TTF test (e.g., 200-W stage completed ⫹ 2 min completed at 225 W; power at V̇O2 peak ⫽ 200 ⫹ 0.5 ⫻ 25 W). TTF cycle test. Pre- and posttraining, each subject performed a constant-load (⬃80 rpm) TTF test on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. Subjects performed 4 min of unloaded cycling and then cycled until exhaustion at their individually determined exercise intensity (power output associated with pretraining V̇O2 peak). The subject’s TTF was defined as the time when her cycling cadence dropped below 60 rpm despite strong verbal encouragement. In our laboratory, the coefficient of variation (CV) for TTF at 100% V̇O2 peak is 5.5%. Training intervention and NaHCO3 supplementation. Once in their assigned groups, each pair of matched subjects was required to complete the same amount of work (kJ) during a training session. Therefore, both Alk-T and Pla-T groups exercised at the same training intensity and completed the same training volume. All subjects commenced the supervised, progressive training program within 4 –7 days of their final pretraining test. Training intensity was set as a percentage of LT, rather than V̇O2 peak, because metabolic and cardiovascular stresses are similar when individuals of differing fitness levels exercise at a percent of LT but can vary significantly when training at a 919 ⫺ Fig. 1. Blood pH (pHb; A), HCO3 ([HCO⫺ 3 ]b; B), and lactate ([La ]b; C) changes during training [8 ⫻ 2-min intervals at 140% lactate threshold (LT), 1-min rest] after the ingestion of NaHCO3 (Alk-T) or placebo (Pla-T) trials (pilot work collected on 3 subjects; int ⫽ interval number, samples taken after each interval). *Significantly different from the placebo trial (P ⬍ 0.05). 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org 920 INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY J Appl Physiol • VOL final display as micromoles H⫹ per gram dry muscle per unit pH (mol H⫹ 䡠 g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠 pH⫺1) and determined as the subject’s min-vitro. This technique measures the buffering potential of the physiochemical buffers within the muscle, excluding bicarbonate, which is removed during the freeze-drying process. In our laboratory, the CV for min-vitro is 5.4%. This CV was determined from muscle samples taken 5 wk apart from recreationally active female students. Muscle metabolites. Freeze-dried rest and postexercise muscle samples (3.5– 6 mg) were enzymatically assayed for lactate, phosphocreatine, creatine, and ATP (22). Muscle metabolite concentrations were adjusted to the individual highest TCr content, to account for measurement errors arising from the variable inclusion of connective tissue, fat, or blood in tissue samples. Statistical analysis. All values are reported as means ⫾ SD, except Figs. 1, 2, and 3 (⫾SE). Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures for time were used to test for interaction and main effects for the dependent variables measured (SPSS 10.0, Chicago, IL). When an effect was found, least significant difference post hoc tests were performed to determine where the difference occurred. When no between-group differences were found, analysis was performed on the combined Alk-T and Pla-T group results. Pearson’s correlation was used to determine the relationship between pre min-vitro and percent change in min-vitro. The alpha level for statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS Pilot data showed that NaHCO3 ingestion before training resulted in an increase in pHb immediately before exercise, and after four and eight 2-min intervals (Fig. 1A). NaHCO3 ingestion resulted in an elevated [HCO3]b immediately before exercise and after one, four, and eight 2-min intervals (Fig. 1B). NaHCO3 ingestion also elevated [La⫺]b after eight 2-min intervals (Fig. 1C). The mean heart rate during a typical training session (immediately after eight 2-min exercise intervals) was 188 ⫾ 5 and 189 ⫾ 3 beats/min for the Alk-T and Pla-T groups, respectively, with no difference between groups; this was ⬃95% of maximal heart rate. After training, there were no changes in body mass for either group (Table 1). V̇O2 peak and LT during the GXT. After the training period, there was an increase in V̇O2 peak (Alk-T 22%, Pla-T 17%; P ⬍ 0.05), with no difference between groups (Table 1). Training also improved the LT for both groups (Alk-T 26%, Pla-T 15%; P ⬍ 0.05), with a greater improvement after Alk-T (P ⫽ 0.05, Table 1). There was a reduction in the relative intensity of the TTF test from pretraining (100% power at V̇O2 peak for both Table 1. Body mass, V̇O2peak, and LT before and after 8 wk of training Variable Body mass, kg V̇O2peak, l/min Power at V̇O2peak, W LTDmax, W LT as percent of TTF power Group Pretraining Posttraining Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T 64.7⫾10.5 59.0⫾6.7 2.41⫾0.38 2.34⫾0.34 172⫾27 169⫾25 109⫾21 112⫾19 63.1⫾5.5 66.3⫾5.3 63.3⫾9.6 59.5⫾7.4 2.86⫾0.23* 2.76⫾0.32* 203⫾26* 200⫾20* 137⫾20*† 130⫾21* 79.9⫾3.1* 77.4⫾9.2* Values are means ⫾ SD. V̇O2peak, maximal O2 uptake; LT, lactate threshold; TTF, time to fatigue; Alk-T, NaHCO3 training group; Pla-T, placebo training group. *Significantly different from pretraining (P ⬍ 0.05); †Significantly different from PLA-T (P ⫽ 0.05). 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 170% (weeks 6, 7, and 8) of subjects’ individually determined power at the pretraining LT. This equated to 91% (weeks 1 and 2), 97% (weeks 3 and 4), 103% (week 5), and 110% (weeks 6, 7, and 8) of the power at pretraining V̇O2 peak. There were no significant differences in the percentage of V̇O2 peak that subjects trained at between groups. Subjects completed six to nine 2-min intervals during weeks 1 and 2, eight to ten 2-min intervals on weeks 3 and 4, nine to twelve 2-min intervals on weeks 5 to 7, and six to nine 2-min intervals on week 8. All subjects completed the same total number of intervals, with training sessions periodized so that the training volume altered from Monday to Friday. Each 2-min interval (80 rpm) was interspersed with a 1-min recovery period. Progression was controlled by increasing the workload (by altering the resistance) and the number of intervals performed in a training session. During the taper period (last two training sessions before posttesting), supplementation with NaHCO3 or placebo was stopped for both groups so that there was not an elevated resting [HCO3]b or pHb during posttesting, which has been reported after chronic NaHCO3 supplementation by healthy subjects (31). No NaHCO3 was ingested during posttesting. Gas analysis (GXT). During both the pre- and posttraining GXT and TTF test, pulmonary gas exchange was determined breath by breath for O2 and CO2 concentrations and ventilation by use of a portable gas analysis system (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy). The gas analyzers were calibrated immediately before and verified after each test by using a certified gravimetric gas mixture (BOC Gases, Chatswood, Australia). The ventilometer was calibrated preexercise and verified postexercise using a 3-liter syringe in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. There were no significant differences between pre- and posttest calibrations for any test. Capillary blood sampling and analysis. A hyperemic ointment (Finalgon, Boehringer Ingelheim) was applied to the earlobe 5–7 min before initial blood sampling. Capillary (earlobe) blood samples (50 l) were taken at rest and immediately after each 4-min stage of the GXT. Samples (100 l) were also taken at rest, immediately and 3 and 5 min after the TTF test. Capillary blood lactate concentration ([La⫺]b), pH, and HCO3 were measured via a blood-gas analyzer (ABL 625, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Muscle sampling and analysis. On the day of the TTF test, one incision was made under local anesthesia (5 ml, 1% xylocaine) into the vastus lateralis of each subject. The incision was used for the pretest biopsy and then closed with a Steri-Strip and subsequently used for the posttest biopsy. Pre- and posttest biopsy samples were taken with the needle inserted at different angles, with manual suction applied for both samples. The first muscle sample was taken (before warm-up) during supine rest. The second muscle sample was taken immediately after the cessation of the TTF, although the subject remained on the cycle ergometer. Pre- and posttraining samples were taken on opposite legs from approximately the same position. The samples were then removed from the biopsy needle and stored at ⫺80°C until subsequent analysis. Freeze-dried muscle was then dissected free from visible blood, fat, and connective tissue. min-vitro and pHi. All in vitro m (min-vitro) results were determined on resting, preexercise muscle samples. Freeze-dried samples (1.8 –2.3 mg) were homogenized on ice for 2 min in a solution containing sodium fluoride (10 mM) at a dilution of 30 mg dry muscle/ml of homogenizing solution (30). The muscle homogenate was then placed in a circulating water bath at 37°C for 5 min before and during the measurement of pH. The pH measurements were made with a microelectrode (MI-415, Microelectrodes, Bedford, NH) connected to a pH meter (SA 520, Orion Research, Cambridge, MA). After initial pH measurement, muscle homogenates (rest samples) were adjusted to a pH of ⬃7.2 with a sodium hydroxide (0.02 M) solution and then titrated to a pH of ⬃6.2 by the serial addition of 2 l of hydrochloric acid (10 mM) blind to the subject being analyzed. From the fitted titration trend line, the number of moles of H⫹ (per g of dry muscle) required to change the pH from 7.1 to 6.5 was interpolated. This value was then normalized to the whole pH unit for INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY 921 Fig. 2. Muscle buffer capacity (in vitro) (min-vitro) (mol H⫹ 䡠 g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠 pH⫺1) before and after the training period for Alk-T and Pla-T (A) and before and after the training period after separation into either the pretraining high (pretraining min-vitro ⬎ 160 mol H⫹ 䡠 g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠 pH⫺1) or low (pretraining min-vitro ⬍ 140 mol H⫹ 䡠 g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠 pH⫺1) min-vitro groups (B). Values are means ⫾ SE. *Significantly different from pretraining (P ⬍ 0.05). †Significantly different from high min-vitro (P ⬍ 0.05). groups) to posttraining for both groups (Alk-T 84.5 ⫾ 4.6%, Pla-T 83.9 ⫾ 4.8% power at V̇O2 peak; P ⬍ 0.05), with no differences between them. Performance during the TTF test. The mean power during the constant-load TTF test (matched pre- and posttraining) was 160 ⫾ 10 and 165 ⫾ 10 W for the Alk-T and Pla-T groups, respectively (P ⬎ 0.05). Both groups had improvements in TTF (s) after the training period (Alk-T 164%, Pla-T 123%; P ⬍ 0.05, Fig. 2). However, there was a greater improvement after Alk-T than Pla-T (P ⫽ 0.05). Both groups had an increase in V̇O2 at 1 min, 6 min, and the end of exercise during the TTF test (P ⬍ 0.05; Table 2); however, there were no differences between groups. m and muscle/blood metabolites and pH during the TTF test. There was an improvement in m after training, with no differences between groups (P ⬍ 0.05, Fig. 3A). There was a correlation between pretraining m and percent change in m after training (r ⫽ ⫺0.70; P ⬍ 0.05, Fig. 4). Because of this relationship between pretraining m and percent change in m, we then placed subjects (from both groups) into either a high [⬎160 (range: 160.3–223.2) mol H⫹ 䡠g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠pH⫺1] or low [⬍140 (range: 81.2–138.9) mol H⫹ 䡠g muscle dry wt⫺1 䡠pH⫺1] pretraining m group (on the basis of previous research; Refs. 16, 17). There was an improvement in m for the low-m group (31%, P ⬍ 0.05; Fig. 3B), with no change for the high-m group (4%, P ⬎ 0.05). After the training period, there were no differences compared with pretraining in resting or postexercise muscle ATP, phosphocreatine, lactate, or pHi for either group (P ⬎ 0.05, Table 3). After training, there were no differences from pretraining in Table 2. V̇O2 during the TTF test before and after 8 wk of training Variable 1 min V̇O2, l/min 6 min V̇O2, l/min End exercise V̇O2, l/min Group Pretraining Posttraining Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T 1.78⫾0.41 1.70⫾0.20 2.40⫾0.33 2.24⫾0.48 2.41⫾0.24 2.20⫾0.38 2.06⫾0.13* 2.05⫾0.26* 2.75⫾0.31* 2.77⫾0.41* 2.68⫾0.28* 2.64⫾0.39* Values are mean ⫾ SD. V̇O2, O2 uptake. *Significantly different from pretraining (P ⬍ 0.05). J Appl Physiol • VOL Fig. 4. Relationship between pretraining min-vitro and change (%) in min-vitro from pre- to posttraining. 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 Fig. 3. Time to fatigue during the constant-load exercise test (100% pretraining peak O2 uptake intensity). Values are means ⫾ SE. *Significantly different from pretraining (P ⫽ 0.05). §Alk-T significantly different from Pla-T (P ⬍ 0.05). 922 INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY Table 3. Muscle ATP, PCr, Cr, [La⫺]i, and pHi at rest and immediately postexercise during the TTF test, before and after 8 wk of training Pretraining Posttraining Variable Group Preexercise Postexercise Preexercise Postexercise [ATP], mmol/kg dry wt Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T 24.0⫾1.7 23.1⫾1.3 96.9⫾22.5 88.9⫾14.8 49.0⫾13.8 45.5⫾17.8 9.4⫾5.3 6.3⫾3.6 7.13⫾0.06 7.15⫾0.04 19.7⫾4.4† 18.2⫾5.3† 55.3⫾13.5† 55.8⫾15.3† 90.6⫾28.3† 78.6⫾25.4† 52.6⫾16.6† 47.9⫾17.5† 6.94⫾0.08† 6.89⫾0.12† 23.6⫾1.5 22.4⫾1.3 96.6⫾18.4 84.3⫾13.2 46.2⫾17.9 52.8⫾19.3 8.3⫾3.8 5.7⫾1.0 7.11⫾0.05 7.14⫾0.04 20.3⫾4.0† 19.5⫾4.0† 56.6⫾28.7† 61.6⫾17.1† 87.2⫾26.8† 73.1⫾27.0† 63.3⫾26.8† 49.5⫾21.4† 6.87⫾0.04† 6.94⫾0.05† [PCr], mmol/kg dry wt [Cr], mmol/kg dry wt [La⫺]i, mmol/kg dry wt pHi Values are means ⫾ SD. There were no significant differences between groups pre- or posttraining. PCr, phosphocreatine; Cr, creatine; [La⫺]i, intracellular lactate concentration; pHi, intracellular pH. †Significantly different from rest (P ⬍ 0.05). DISCUSSION The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of NaHCO3 ingestion during training on changes in m. Induced alkalosis (NaHCO3 ingestion) before training did not affect training-induced improvements in m. Therefore, in contrast to our hypothesis, the present results indicate that H⫹ accumulation during training is not an important factor in improving m. The present study also identified a relationship between pretraining m and the percent change in m after training (Fig. 4). We have shown that chronically induced alkalosis does affect some training adaptations. Although training intensity and volume were matched between groups, the Alk-T group had greater improvements in the LT and shortterm endurance performance (TTF at pretraining V̇O2 peak intensity) than the Pla-T group. There was an increase in O2 uptake, no significant change in muscle metabolites at exhaustion, and a reduced accumulation of blood metabolites for both groups after the training period. Study design. Our experimental group was required to ingest a large dose of NaHCO3 before each training session. Pilot research (see Fig. 1A), along with the results of previous reports (5, 39), has demonstrated that this NaHCO3-ingestion protocol results in a large reduction in both rest and exercise blood H⫹ concentration ([H⫹]). Furthermore, NaHCO3 ingestion decreases intracellular [H⫹] during intense continuous and interval exercise [i.e., pHi at the end of four 1-min intervals at 100% V̇O2 max intensity was 6.86 for NaHCO3 and 6.72 for a placebo group (12)] (34, 39). To ensure a significant H⫹ accumulation during each training session and differences in H⫹ accumulation between our training groups, we employed a very demanding training protocol and used a greater dose of NaHCO3 than employed by others (0.40 vs. 0.30 – 0.15 g/kg body mass). Therefore, although we were unable to take blood samples and muscle biopsies before and after training sessions, we are confident that there were differences in blood [H⫹] and intracellular [H⫹] between the Alk-T and Pla-T groups during training. m and training. The similar improvements in m by both groups (Fig. 2A) suggest that the ingestion of NaHCO3, and so altering the likely accumulation of H⫹ during training, did not Table 4. pHb, [La⫺]b, and [HCO3⫺]b at rest and immediately postexercise during the TTF test, before and after 8 wk training Pretraining Variable pHb [La⫺]b, mmol/l [HCO3⫺]b, mmol/l Rest Post 0 Post 3 Post 5 Rest Post 0 Post 3 Post 5 Rest Post 0 Post 3 Post 5 min min min min min min Posttraining Alk-T Pla-T Alk-T Pla-T 7.425⫾.027 7.179⫾.072† 7.161⫾.027† 7.162⫾.028† 1.1⫾0.4 18.9⫾5.0† 19.4⫾4.5† 16.3⫾2.4† 22.9⫾2.7 11.6⫾2.1† 9.7⫾1.3† 10.0⫾1.8† 7.443⫾.021 7.179⫾.066† 7.152⫾.080† 7.140⫾.079† 1.1⫾0.3 18.9⫾2.9† 19.8⫾3.8† 17.9⫾3.5† 24.2⫾3.2 11.4⫾2.0† 9.6⫾1.4† 9.4⫾1.8† 7.426⫾.053 7.178⫾.067† 7.180⫾.070†* 7.185⫾.055†* 1.1⫾0.5 15.6⫾4.2†* 14.6⫾3.5†* 13.6⫾3.6†* 23.0⫾2.4 10.6⫾1.7† 10.7⫾2.4† 11.0⫾2.4† 7.424⫾.031 7.168⫾.063† 7.197⫾.054†* 7.217⫾.074†* 1.2⫾0.5 16.7⫾1.6†* 15.6⫾2.0†* 14.8⫾2.9†* 24.4⫾1.9 10.1⫾1.4† 10.7⫾1.5† 11.3⫾2.4† Values are means ⫾ SD. There were no significant differences between groups pre- or posttraining. pHb, blood pH; [La⫺]b, blood lactate concentration; [HCO3⫺]b, blood bicarbonate ion concentration. *Significantly different from pretraining at the same time point (P ⬍ 0.05). †Significantly different from rest (P ⬍ 0.05). J Appl Physiol • VOL 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 any of the resting blood variables; however, both groups recorded smaller changes in postexercise [La⫺]b and pHb, with no difference between groups (Table 4). INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY J Appl Physiol • VOL for Alk-T than the Pla-T group (26 vs. 15%, respectively; P ⫽ 0.05). The LT is a good indicator of the aerobic capacity of the working muscles, in particular O2 utilization within the muscle (11, 26, 44). Those with a greater LT also have an elevated muscle respiratory capacity and aerobic enzyme activity, despite similar V̇O2 peak values (23, 26). Although a relationship between muscle oxidative capacity and V̇O2 peak has also been reported, the association is smaller than that with the LT (3, 23), and it seems that V̇O2 peak is primarily determined by O2 delivery rather than O2 utilization within the muscle (24). Therefore, the greater LT, but not V̇O2 peak, after Alk-T than Pla-T may be indicative of a greater improvement in oxidative capacity within their trained muscle. To date, we have not found any reports identifying the effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion before training on changes in the LT, aerobic fitness, or oxidative capacity of the muscle. However, although mild acidosis may benefit O2 unloading within the muscle during exercise (19, 20, 27), there is an acute, detrimental effect of a large drop in pHi on mitochondrial phosphorylation and cellular respiration (38). Furthermore, an exhaustive interval training session negatively affects some mitochondrial enzymes (10). Therefore, a smaller drop in pHb and pHi (after NaHCO3 ingestion) during regular, intense interval training may result in a reduced impact on mitochondrial function and may, therefore, promote improved mitochondrial adaptations. Chronic NaHCO3 provides a protective effect against the detrimental metabolic consequences of chronic metabolic acidosis in patients (8 –10, 13) and may act similarly during the acidosis that occurs during repeated intense exercise. High levels of acute and chronic acidosis negatively affect skeletal muscle protein synthesis, amino acid oxidation, and insulin sensitivity in rats and humans (1, 10, 29, 32, 40). In contrast, correction of acidosis with NaHCO3 supplementation increases skeletal muscle protein synthesis and insulin sensitivity and reduces the content of enzymes involved in the ubiquitinproteasome pathway (43). Although no training studies to date have used NaHCO3 supplementation and measured protein synthesis, in a study employing exercise training (strenuous treadmill training, 5–7 days/wk ⫻ 11 wk) and chronic NaHCO3 ingestion (0.05 mg/kg each day), bone mineral content and density were both positively affected in rats supplemented with NaHCO3, compared with a training-only group (7, 37). Acute alkalosis also improves K⫹ regulation during intense exercise, possibly via a positive effect on transport proteins (11, 14). Therefore, the greater endurance performance after NaHCO3 supplementation in the present study may be due to greater changes in intracellular levels of proteins involved in ion regulation and/or mitochondrial respiration, and, if so, this may also be associated with the greater improvement in TTF. TTF. Similar to others that have employed intense training with subjects who are not highly endurance trained (11, 14), there were large improvements (⬎100%) in TTF. However, a novel finding was that there were greater improvements in TTF after Alk-T than Pla-T (164 vs. 123%, respectively). This may be associated with the elevated LT in the Alk-T group. Changes in time to exhaustion after intense interval training are associated with improvements in the LT (r ⫽ 0.71– 0.84, P ⬍ 0.05) and in some circumstances may be better predictors of training-induced changes to endurance performance than 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 affect changes in m. Therefore, the present results indicate that H⫹ accumulation during training is not an important factor in improving m. In support of this, an increase in m occurred after training (⬃80% power at V̇O2 max by welltrained cyclists) (45) that does not result in large changes to pHi (pHi, 7.09 to 7.01) (42). Therefore, training intensity, rather than changes in intracellular [H⫹], may be the most important stimulus to improve the intracellular buffers that affect m (i.e., protein and carnosine content). As a result of the intense training (heart rate ⬃95% of maximum), it is impossible to exclude the possibility that the similar improvements in m between the two groups were due to an increase in intracellular [H⫹] beyond some “threshold level” resulting in increases in m in both groups. pHi is not significantly altered during the early portion of intense exercise (1–5 min) after induced alkalosis, but rather during the latter half of an exercise bout or interval training session (12, 16, 34, 43). This suggests that there may have been a similar H⫹ accumulation within the muscle during the initial interval bouts, which could have contributed to the similar training adaptations between our two groups. However, in the present study, there does not seem to have been an additive effect of accumulating more H⫹ during the interval training on improvements in m. Although we did report improvements in m, these changes were varied within the groups and were less than reported after a shorter (5-wk) training period (mean 9 –19 vs. 25%; Refs. 17, 35). These differences between studies are not likely to be due to general subject characteristics, because subjects were similar in age (⬃19 vs. 20 yr), sex (all women), and aerobic fitness (⬃42 vs. 44 ml䡠kg⫺1 䡠min⫺1). Furthermore, the same training program (2-min intervals with 1-min rest) and mode of exercise (cycling) were employed. However, the mean pretraining m was ⬃20% greater in the present study than in the previous report (⬃154 vs. 123 mol H⫹ 䡠g muscle dry mass⫺1 䡠pH⫺1), possibly because of differing sports participation and training status (competitive club vs. recreational athletes) (33, 37). The results from the present study show an association between pretraining m and percent improvement in m (Fig. 4). This indicates that there may be a reduced improvement in m after training in those that already have a well-developed m. On the basis of these findings, we performed further analysis, separating subjects into a high-m and a low-m group. The subsequent findings revealed that the low-m group had similar changes in m to our previous report (31 vs. 25%, Fig. 2B), whereas the improvement was much smaller for the high-m group (4%). This may also explain why some studies have not reported changes in m after training (30, 33). However, care must be taken when comparing different studies, because muscle preparation methods (dilution ratios and wet or dry muscle) affect m values (11, 26). Enhanced V̇O2 peak and LT after training. Both Alk-T and Pla-T had improvements in V̇O2 peak and power at V̇O2 peak after training, with no differences between groups. The increases in power at V̇O2 peak resulted in a large reduction of the relative intensity of the TTF test from 100% of pretraining V̇O2 peak intensity to 84.5% (Alk-T) and 83.9% (Pla-T) of the power at the posttraining V̇O2 peak. The changes in V̇O2 peak and relative intensity during the TTF test were similar for both groups and do not seem to explain the differences in TTF between the two groups. However, there were greater improvements in the LT 923 924 INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the volunteers for time and dedication during this challenging project. The technical assistance of Dr. Rob Duffield is gratefully acknowledged. J. Edge is currently at the Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. GRANTS This study was supported by a University of Western Australia Research Grant. REFERENCES 1. Bailey JL and Mitch WE. Twice-told tales of metabolic acidosis, glucocorticoids, and protein wasting: what do results from rats tell us about patients with kidney disease. Semin Dial 13: 227–231, 2000. 2. Baldwin J, Snow RJ, and Febbraio MA. Effect of training status and relative exercise intensity on physiological responses in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1648 –1654, 2000. J Appl Physiol • VOL 3. Bassett DR and Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 70 – 84, 2000. 4. Bell GJ and Wenger HA. The effect of one-legged sprint training on intramuscular pH and non-bicarbonate buffering capacity. Eur J Appl Physiol 58: 158 –164, 1988. 5. Bishop D and Claudius B. Effects of induced metabolic alkalosis on prolonged intermittent-sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 759 –767, 2005. 6. Bishop D, Jenkins DG, and Mackinnon LT. The relationship between plasma lactate parameters, Wpeak and 1-h cycling performance in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 1270 –1275, 1998. 7. Burgomaster KA, Hughes SC, Heigenhauser GJ, Bradwell SN, and Gibala MJ. Six sessions of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance capacity in humans. J Appl Physiol 98: 1985–1990, 2005. 8. Caso G, Garlick BA, Casella GA, Sasvary D, and Garlick PJ. Acute metabolic acidosis inhibits muscle protein synthesis in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287: E90 –E96, 2004. 9. Caso G, Garlick BA, Casella GA, Sasvary D, and Garlick PJ. Response of protein synthesis to hypercapnia in rats: independent effects of acidosis and hypothermia. Metab Clin Exper 54: 841– 847, 2005. 10. Caso G and Garlick PJ. Control of muscle protein kinetics by acid-base balance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 8: 73–76, 2005. 11. Coggan AR, Kohrt WM, Spina RJ, Kirwan JP, Bier DM, and Holloszy JO. Plasma glucose kinetics during exercise in subjects with high and low lactate thresholds. J Appl Physiol 73: 1873–1880, 1992. 12. Costill DL, Verstappen F, Kuipers H, Janssen E, and Fink W. Acid-base balance during repeated bouts of exercise: influence of HCO3. Int J Sports Med 5: 228 –231, 1984. 13. DeFronzo RA and Beckles AD. Glucose intolerance following chronic metabolic acidosis in man. Am J Physiol 5: E328 –E334, 1979. 14. Demarle A, Heugas AM, Slawinski JJ, Tricot VM, Koralsztein JP, and Billat VL. Whichever the initial training status, any increase in the velocity at lactate threshold appears as a major factor in improved time to exhaustion at the same severe velocity after training. Arch Physiol Biochem 111: 167–176, 2003. 15. Duffield R, Edge J, and Bishop D. Effects of high-intensity interval training on the VO2 response during severe exercise. In press. 16. Edge J, Bishop D, and Goodman C. The effects of training intensity on muscle buffer capacity in females. Eur J Appl Physiol 96: 225–234, 2006. 17. Edge J, Bishop D, Hill-Haas S, Goodman C, and Dawson B. Comparison of muscle buffer capacity and repeated-sprint ability of untrained, endurance-trained and team-sport athletes. 96: 97–105, 2006. 18. Favero TG, Zable AC, Bowman M, Thompson A, and Abramson JJ. Metabolic end products inhibit sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2⫹ release and [H]ryanodine binding. J Appl Physiol 78: 1665–1672, 1995. 19. Forbes SC, Raymer GH, Kowalchuk JM, and Marsh GD. NaHCO3induced alkalosis reduces the phosphocreatine slow component during heavy-intensity forearm exercise. J Appl Physiol 99: 1668 –1675, 2005. 20. Harkema SJ and Meyer RA. Effect of acidosis on control of respiration in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272: C491–C500, 1997. 21. Harmer AR, McKenna MJ, Sutton JR, Snow RJ, Ruell PA, Booth J, Thompson MW, Mackay NA, Stathis CG, Crameri RM, Carey MF, and Eager DM. Skeletal muscle metabolic and ionic adaptations during intense exercise following sprint training in humans. J Appl Physiol 89: 1793–1803, 2000. 22. Harris RC, Hultman E, and Nordesjo LO. Glycogen, glycolytic intermediates and high-energy phosphates determined in biopsy samples of musculus quadriceps femoris of man at rest. Methods and variance of values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 33: 109 –120, 1974. 23. Holloszy JO and Coyle EF. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol 56: 831– 838, 1984. 24. Homma T, Hamaoka T, Sako T, Murakami M, Esaki K, Kime R, and Katsumura T. Muscle oxidative metabolism accelerates with mild acidosis during incremental intermittent isometric plantar flexion exercise. Dyn Med 4: 1–14, 2005. 25. Hultman E, Del Canale S, and Sjoholm H. Effect of induced metabolic acidosis on intracellular pH, buffer capacity and contraction force of human skeletal muscle. Clin Sci (Lond) 69: 505–510, 1985. 26. Ivy JL, Withers RT, Van Handel PJ, Elger DH, and Costill DL. Muscle respiratory capacity and fiber type as determinants of the lactate threshold. J Appl Physiol 48: 523–527, 1980. 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 V̇O2 peak (21). This is supported by our results, as we found no significant between-group difference in V̇O2 peak but a greater LT and endurance time after Alk-T. The difference in time to exhaustion from pre- to posttraining and between the Alk-T and Pla-T groups posttraining does not seem to be due to the accumulation of muscle metabolites at fatigue (Table 3). Because of the large changes in aerobic fitness and relative exercise intensity of the TTF test, it is likely that there was a delayed contribution or slower anaerobic metabolism for both training groups that is not reflected in the end-exercise muscle measures. Harmer et al. (21) did not report changes in the accumulation of metabolites or total anaerobic energy production but did report a reduction in the rate of anaerobic energy production, when determined from muscle samples taken at exhaustion after high-intensity interval training. Our laboratory too has previously shown (15) that intense interval training, employing the same training as the present report, can reduce the anaerobic contribution (19 to 7%) during high-intensity, constant-load exercise of a fixed duration. Although the total anaerobic energy production may have been similar pre- and posttraining, it is likely that the relative contribution of anaerobic energy production was reduced after training. The increase in O2 uptake found in both training groups supports the suggestion that the anaerobic contribution was reduced during the TTF test after training. However, the changes in whole-body O2 uptake in the present study do not explain the differences in TTF between the Alk-T and Pla-T groups. In summary, the present study has shown that 8 wk of intense interval training, by subjects who are not well trained, accompanied by chronic NaHCO3 supplementation, does not affect changes in m. This suggests that training intensity, rather than the accumulation of H⫹ during training, is more important to improvements in m. We also show that pretraining m is related to training-induced changes to m. A novel finding was that the supplementation of NaHCO3 during intense interval training resulted in greater improvements in the LT and short-term endurance performance during high-intensity exercise (TTF at 100% pretraining V̇O2 peak intensity). The improved endurance performance after NaHCO3 supplementation does not seem to be explained by differences in O2 uptake, the concentration of muscle or blood metabolites at the end of exercise, or changes to V̇O2 peak but is likely to be associated with the greater improvements in the LT. INTERVAL TRAINING AND MUSCLE BUFFER CAPACITY J Appl Physiol • VOL 38. Rasmussen UF, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J, and Rasmussen HN. The effect of high-intensity exhaustive exercise studied in isolated mitochondria from human skeletal muscle. Pflügers Arch 443: 180 –187, 2001. 39. Raymer GH, Marsh GD, Kowalchuk JM, and Thompson TR. Metabolic effects of induced alkalosis during progressive forearm exercise to fatigue. J Appl Physiol 96: 2050 –2056, 2004. 40. Rico H, Paez E, Aznar L, Hernandez ER, Seco S, and Villa LF. Effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on axial and peripheral bone mass in rats on strenuous treadmill training exercise. J Bone Miner Metab 19: 97–101, 2001. 41. Spriet LL, Lindinger MI, McKelvie RS, Heigenhauser GJF, and Jones NL. Muscle glycogenolysis and H⫹ concentration during maximal intermittent cycling. J Appl Physiol 66: 8 –13, 1989. 42. Stepto NK, Martin DT, Fallon KE, and Hawley JA. Metabolic demands of intense aerobic interval training in competitive cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 303–310, 2001. 43. Street D, Nielsen JJ, Bangsbo J, and Juel C. Metabolic alkalosis reduces exercise-induced acidosis and potassium accumulation in human skeletal muscle interstitium. J Physiol 566: 481– 489, 2005. 44. Walsh B, Tonkonogi M, and Sahlin K. Effect of endurance training on oxidative and antioxidative function in human permeabilized muscle fibres. Pflügers Arch 442: 420 – 425, 2001. 45. Weston AR, Myburgh KH, Lindsay FH, Dennis SC, Noakes TD, and Hawley JA. Skeletal muscle buffering capacity and endurance performance after high-intensity interval training by well-trained cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 75: 7–13, 1997. 46. Yoshida T and Waitari H. 31P-Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of the time course of energy metabolism during exercise and recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol 66: 494 – 499, 1993. 47. Yoshida T and Waitari H. Changes in intracellular pH during repeated exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 67: 274 –278, 1993. 101 • SEPTEMBER 2006 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 17, 2017 27. Jubrias SA, Crowther GJ, Shankland EG, Gronka RK, and Conley KE. Acidosis inhibits oxidative phosphorylation in contracting human skeletal muscle in vivo. J Physiol 533: 589 –599, 2003. 28. Juel C. Muscle pH regulation: role of training. Acta Physiol Scand 162: 359 –366, 1998. 29. Mak RHK. Effect of metabolic acidosis on insulin action and secretion in uremia. Kidney Int 54: 603– 607, 1998. 30. Mannion AF, Jakeman PM, and Willan PLT. Determination of human skeletal muscle buffer value by homogenate technique: methods of measurement. J Appl Physiol 75: 1412–1418, 1993. 31. McNaughton L, Backx K, Palmer G, and Strange N. Effects of chronic bicarbonate ingestion on the performance of high-intensity work. Eur J Appl Physiol 80: 333–336, 1999. 32. Mutsvangwa T, Gilmore J, Squires JE, Lindinger MI, and McBride BW. Chronic metabolic acidosis increases mRNA levels for components of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway in skeletal muscle of dairy cows. J Nutr 13: 558 –561, 2004. 33. Nevill ME, Boobis LS, Brooks S, and Williams C. Effect of training on muscle metabolism during treadmill sprinting. J Appl Physiol 67: 2376 – 2382, 1989. 34. Nielsen HB, Hein L, Svendsen LB, Secher NH, and Quistorff B. Bicarbonate attenuates intracellular acidosis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46: 579 –584, 2002. 35. Parkhouse WS, McKenzie DC, Hochachka PW, and Ovalle WK. Buffering capacity of deproteinized human vastus lateralis muscle. J Appl Physiol 58: 14 –17, 1985. 36. Pedersen TH, Nielsen OB, Lamb GD, and Stephenson DG. Intracellular acidosis enhances the excitability of working muscle [see comment]. Science 305: 1144 –1147, 2004. 37. Pilegaard H, Domino K, Noland T, Juel C, Hellsten Y, Halestrap AP, and Bangsbo J. Effect of high-intensity exercise training on lactate/ hydrogen ion transport capacity in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E255–E261, 1999. 925
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz