2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Weekly Lecture: Week 03 Chaps 7, 8 & 9 –Government Actions in Markets, Global Markets in Action & Externalities: Pollution, Education, and Health Care Chaps 7 Government Actions in Markets CHAPTER ROADMAP What ’ sNe wi nt hi sEdi t i on? Chapter 7 is updated from the fifth edition, with updated data for the Eye applications. Where We Are We use the demand and supply graph to study how the government can influence markets. Taxes, price ceilings, price floors, and price supports can prevent markets from efficiently allocating resources. Examples show how these actions impact consumers and firms, how equilibrium prices and quantities change, and how they create deadweight losses. Whe r eWe ’ veBe e n We ’ vede ve l ope dt hede ma nda nds uppl ymode l ,at oolt ous ei nexamining how markets determine their equilibrium prices and quantities. The elasticities of supply and demand reflect how responsive quantities are to a change in price. These ideas play an important role in showing how market interventions create inefficiency and unfairness. Whe r eWe ’ r eGoi ng The next chapter examines how global markets work and looks at the effects of government policies such as tariffs and quotas. CHAPTER LECTURE 7.1 Taxes on Buyers and Sellers Tax Incidence Tax incidence is the division of the burden of a tax between the buyer and the seller. The buye r s ’bur de na r i s e swhe nt h epr i c epa i dbyt hebuy e r sr i s e sa f t e rt het a xi s 1 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics i mpos e d.Thes e l l e r s ’bur de na r i s e swhe nt hepr i c et he yr e c e i vef a l l sa f t e rt het a xi s imposed. The tax incidence does not depend on whether the tax law imposes the tax on buyers or on sellers. A tax on sellers: Imposing a tax on sellers decreases the supply because the tax is like a cost that sellers must pay. The supply curve shifts leftward and the vertical distance between the initial supply curve and the new supply curve is equal to the amount of the tax. The price paid by buyers rises, the price received by sellers falls, and the quantity decreases. The figure shows the effect of a tax imposed on sellers. The initial price is $12 and the initial quantity is 10,000. When the tax is imposed, the supply curve shifts from S to S + tax. The length of the double headed equals the amount of the tax, $2. With the tax imposed, buyers pay $13, sellers receive $11, and the quantity decreases to 9,000. A tax on buyers: Imposing a tax on buyers decreases the demand because the tax lowers the amount they are willing to pay to the sellers. The demand curve shifts leftward and the vertical distance between the initial demand curve and the new demand curve is equal to the amount of the tax. The price paid by buyers rises, the price received by sellers falls, and the quantity decreases. The figure shows the effect of a tax imposed on buyers. The initial price is $12 per DVD and the initial quantity is 10,000 DVDs per month. When the tax is imposed, the demand curve shifts from D to D tax. The length of the double headed equals the amount of the tax, $2. With the tax imposed, buyers pay $13 per DVD, sellers receive $11 per DVD, and the 2 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics quantity of DVDs decreases to 9,000 per month. The figures above confirm the general conclusion: Regardless of whether the tax is imposed on buyers or sellers, the tax leads to the same outcome in which the new equilibrium price and quantity are identical. The tax burden is split the same way regardless of who is responsible for paying the tax to the government. Taxes and Efficiency Taxes place a wedge between the price buyers pay and sellers receive. It therefore puts a wedge between marginal benefit and marginal cost and creates inefficiency. The quantity produced is less than the efficient quantity. Taxes create an excess burden, which is the amount by which the burden of a tax exceeds the tax revenue received by the government—the deadweight loss from a tax. Incidence, Inefficiency, and the Elasticity of Demand Perfectly Inelastic Demand: Buyer Pays and Efficient: The buyer pays the entire tax if demand is perfectly inelastic (so the demand curve is vertical). In general, the less elastic the demand, the larger the tax burden paid by the buyers. When demand is perfectly elastic, the outcome is efficient because marginal cost equals marginal benefit. Perfectly Elastic Demand: Seller Pays and Inefficient: The seller pays the entire tax if demand is perfectly elastic (so the demand curve is horizontal) In general, the more elastic the demand, the larger the tax burden paid by the sellers. Because marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost, the outcome is inefficient. Incidence, Inefficiency, and the Elasticity of Supply Perfectly Inelastic Supply: Seller Pays and Efficient: The seller pays the entire tax if supply is perfectly inelastic (so the supply curve is vertical). In general, the more inelastic the supply, the larger the tax burden paid by the sellers. When supply is perfectly elastic, marginal benefit equals marginal cost, so the outcome is efficient. Perfectly Elastic Supply: Buyer Pays and Inefficient: The buyer pays the entire tax if supply is perfectly elastic (so the supply curve is horizontal). In general, the more elastic the supply, the larger the tax burden paid by the buyers. Marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost, so the outcome is inefficient. 3 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics If either the demand or the supply is perfectly inelastic, there is no deadweight loss from the tax because the equilibrium quantity does not change. In all other cases, there is a deadweight loss. 7.2 Price Ceilings A price ceiling is a government regulation that places an upper limit on the price at which a particular good, service, or factor of production may be traded. A Rent Ceiling A rent ceiling is a price ceiling applied to a housing market. A rent ceiling is a regulation that makes it illegal to charge more than a specified rent for housing. A rent ceiling set below the equilibrium rent creates a shortage. In the figure, the equilibrium rent is $800 per month and the equilibrium quantity is 3,000 units rented. If a $600 per month rent ceiling is imposed, the quantity of units demanded increases (to 4,000 units in the figure) the quantity of units supplied decreases (to 2,000 units in the figure) and a shortage emerges (of 2,000 units in the figure). Rent ceilings lead to the development of black markets and increased search activity. A black market is an illegal market that operates alongside a government-regulated market. The price in a black market exceeds the legally imposed price ceiling. In a black market illegal arrangements are made between renters and landlords—often at effective rental rates that are higher than would be the case in an unregulated market. Search activity is the time spent looking for someone with whom to do business. Are Rent Ceilings Efficient? Rent ceilings lead to inefficiency. In a competitive market, the equilibrium quantity is the same as the efficient quantity. In a housing market with a rent ceiling, the quantity 4 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics of units is less than the equilibrium quantity and so is less than the efficient quantity. There is a deadweight loss. Are Rent Ceilings Fair? Us i ngt he“ f a i rr ul e s ”c r i t e r i a ,bl oc ki ngvol unt a r ye xc ha ngei sunf a i r . Usingt he“ f a i rout c ome s ”c r i t e r i a ,r e ntc e i l i ng sa r ef a i ri ft he yhe l pt hepoor and disadvantaged. Some other allocative mechanism, such as a lottery, queuing, some form of discrimination is often used to allocate housing. These alternative allocation methods of distribution do not favor the poor and disadvantaged. If Rent Ceilings Are So Bad, Why Do We Have Them? Current renters gain from the presence of rent ceilings and so they lobby politicians to maintain the ceilings. 7.3 Price Floors A price floor is a government regulation that places a lower limit on the price at which a particular good, service, or factor of production may be traded. The Minimum Wage When a price floor is applied to labor markets, it is called a minimum wage. A minimum wage law is a government regulation that makes hiring labor for less than a specified wage illegal. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium wage, it has no impact. If a minimum wage is set above the equilibrium wage rate, the quantity of labor demanded is less than the quantity of labor demanded. The minimum wage creates unemployment because some workers who are willing to work at the minimum wage will not find a job. A minimum wage set above the equilibrium wage leads to increased job-search activity and illegal hiring of workers paid less than the minimum wage. Is the Minimum Wage Efficient? The equilibrium quantity of workers is the efficient quantity because that is quantity at which the marginal benefit to firms equals the marginal cost to workers. A minimum wage decreases the quantity of workers employed, so there is a deadweight loss with less than the efficient quantity of workers are employed. Is the Minimum Wage Fair? A minimum wage gives unfair results because only the people who find jobs benefit. It has unfair rules because it blocks voluntary exchange. 5 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics If the Minimum Wage Is So Bad, Why Do We Have It? Some supporters believe that not much unemployment results. Labor unions lobby for the minimum wage because a higher minimum wage puts upward pressure on all wages. 7.4 Price Supports in Agriculture How Governments Intervene in Markets for Farm Products To support farmers government generally rely upon three elements: The government isolates the domestic market from foreign competition by restricting imports. The government introduces a price support, which is a price floor in an agricultural market maintained by a government guarantee to buy any surplus output at that price. The government pays the producers a subsidy. A subsidy is a payment by the government to a producer to cover part of the cost of production. Price Supports In the figure, the equilibrium price is $400 per ton and the equilibrium quantity is 3 million tons produced and consumed. If the government sets a support price of $500 per ton, then the quantity produced is 4 million tons and the quantity consumed is 2 million tons. There is a 2 million ton surplus, shown by the length of the arrow. To maintain the price at $500 per ton, the government must purchase the surplus. In this case, the government buys 2 million at $500 per ton and thereby gives the farmers a $1 billion subsidy. Thef a r me r s ’t ot a lr e ve nuei nc r e a s e s .The r ei s ,howe ve r ,ade a dwe i g htl os s ,s o society is worse off with the price supports. 6 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Chaps 8 Global Markets in Action CHAPTER ROADMAP What ’ sNe wi nt hi sEdi t i on? Chapter 8 is updated with new data to reflect changes in international trade since the sixth edition. Where We Are Chapter 8 continues studying markets. We learn some history behind the role government plays in international trade, the factors that influence trade patterns, whoga i nsa ndwhol os e sf r omi nt e r na t i ona lt r a de ,a nde xa mi net r a de ’ spol i t i c a l side. Whe r eWe ’ veBe e n We ’ ves e tups uppl ya ndde ma n da na l y s i s ,c ompa r a t i vea dva nt a ge ,c ons ume r surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss to understand the impact of trade on domestic markets. Whe r eWe ’ r eGoi ng Chapter 9 will analyze externalities, both external costs and external benefits, to further our study of the interaction of government and markets. CHAPTER LECTURE 8.1 How Global Markets Work International Trade Today Imports are the goods and services that we buy from people in other countries. Exports are the goods and services that we sell to people in other countries. TheU. S.i st hewor l d’ sl a r g e s ti nt e r national trader, comprising 10 percent of t hewor l d’ se xpor t sa nd12pe r c e ntoft hei mpor t si n2012.Tot a le xpor t swe r e about 14 percent of total U.S. production and total imports were about 17 percent of total U.S. expenditure. What Drives International Trade? The fundamental force that generates international trade is comparative advantage. A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost than any other country. 7 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics The figure shows the market for airplanes in the United States. The world price of a plane, $80 million, exceeds the U.S. price, $60 million, which means that the United States has a comparative advantage in producing airplanes. With no trade, the equilibrium price is $60 million per plane and 300 planes are produced. When the United States trades with the world, the supply curve shows that it will produce 400 planes. Of these 400 planes, the demand curve shows that 200 will be purchased in the United States. The remaining planes will be exported to foreigners. The number of planes produced in the United States increases but the number of planes consumed in the United States decreases. If the world price of a good or service is less than the U.S. price, the United States does not have a comparative advantage in producing the good or service and so it will import the good or service from abroad. The amount of the good or service produced in the United States decreases but the number consumed in the United States increases. 8.2 Winners, Losers, and Net Gains from Trade Gains and Losses from Imports The gains and losses from imports are calculated by examining their effect on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus. Winners see their surplus increase, while losers see their surplus decrease. The figure shows the market for pairs of pants in the United States. The world price of a pair of pants is less than the U.S. price, so the United States imports pants 200 million pairs of pants. Consumer surplus increases and equals the sum of areas C + B + D. Of this amount, area B is lost by producers and gained by consumers. Area D is newly gained surplus resulting from the trade. Producer surplus decreases and equals area A. Without trade, producer surplus would be the sum of areas A + B. 8 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Because the total surplus increases by the amount of area D, the United States is better off with trade. Gains and Losses from Exports The gains and losses from exports are likewise calculated by examining their effect on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus. The figure shows the market for airplanes in the United States. The world price of an airplane exceeds the U.S. price, so the United States exports pants 200 airplanes. Producer surplus increases and equals the sum of areas C + B + D. Of this amount, area B is lost by consumers and gained by producers. Area D is newly gained surplus resulting from the trade. Consumer surplus decreases and equals area A. Without trade, consumer surplus would be the sum of areas A + B. Because the total surplus increases by the amount of area D, the United States is better off with trade. 8.3 International Trade Restrictions Governments restrict international trade to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Tariffs A tariff is a tax on a good that is imposed when it is imported. A tariff raises the domestic price of the good. In the figure, the tariff is equal to $5 per pair of pants, the length of the grey arrow. As a result, the domestic price of a pair of pants rises from $10 to $15. The higher price of a pair of pants decreases the quantity bought in the nation, from 500 million to 400 million in the 9 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics figure. The higher price of a pair of pants increases the quantity produced in the nation, from 100 million to 200 million in the figure. The quantity of pants imported decreases, from 400 million (= 500 million demanded 100 million supplied) to 200 million (= 300 million demanded 200 million supplied) in the figure. The government collects tariff revenue, $1,000 million (=$5 tariff per pants 200 million pants imported) in the figure (which is also equal to area C). A tariff benefits producers and the government, harms consumers, and creates a deadweight loss. Consumers lose consumer surplus, equal to area A + area B + area C + area D. Producers gain additional producer surplus, equal to area A in the figure. The government collects tariff revenue equal to area C in the figure. There is a deadweight loss created from the lost consumer surplus. The deadweight loss is the sum of areas B and D. The deadweight loss indicates that the society is made worse off with the tariff. Import Quotas An import quota is a quantitative restriction on the import of a particular good, which specifies the maximum amount of the good that may be imported in a given period of time. An import quota decreases the quantity of imports and thereby decreases the supply of the good. It raises the domestic price so domestic consumption decreases and domestic production increases. However the government does not gain any revenue; the person who has the right to import the good gains the revenue. An import quota benefits domestic producers and the importers, harms consumers, and creates a deadweight loss. Consumers lose because the domestic price rises. Producers gain producer surplus from selling a greater quantity at a higher price. The importers earn profit from buying at the lower world price and reselling in the U.S. at the higher domestic price (importer profit would be the same amount as the government collects in tariff revenue with a comparable tariff). There is a deadweight loss created from the lost consumer surplus. The deadweight loss indicates that the society is made worse off with the import quota. 10 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Provided that an import quota is set at the same level of imports that would result from a tariff, the impact on market outcomes is nearly identical, with one notable difference—a tariff creates government revenue while an import quota creates profit for the importer. Other Import Barriers Health, safety, and regulation barriers: Imports of certain goods, such as food, pharmaceuticals, and toys may be regulated to ensure that they are safe from contaminants or produced under sanitary conditions. Voluntary export restraints resemble import quotas in that imports decrease, as with an import quota, but with voluntary export restraints the foreign exporterg e t st hepr of i tf r o mt heg a pbe t we e nt heg ood’ sdome s t i cpr i c ea ndi t s world price. Export Subsidies Subsidies are payments by a government to a producer. An export subsidy is a subsidy paid to the producer of goods for export. Such subsidies stimulate production of goods and services and consequently make it difficult for other producers to compete. Export subsidies lead to global overproduction and deadweight loss. 8.4 The Case Against Protection Arguments for protection have varying degrees of credibility: The national security argument: There is an argument for protection of some industries, especially those associated with national defense, to make sure such industries are ready and able to operate in wartime. However, the argument is usually a veiled argument for more widespread protectionism because, in a time of war, there is no industry that does not contribute to national defense. It is more efficient to achieve higher production in target industries through the use of subsidies rather than trade barriers. The infant-industry argument: The so-called infant-industry argument for protection is that it is necessary to protect a new industry to enable it to grow into a mature industry that can compete in world markets. The idea relates to changes in comparative advantages change over because of learning-by-doing. However, the infant industries argument only applies if the benefits of learning-by-doing spill over to other industries. Moreover, historical evidence indicates that protected industries have a difficult time developing into globally competitive industries. The dumping argument: Dumping occurs when a foreign firm sells its exports at a lower price than its cost of production. Dumping might be used by a firm that wants to gain a global monopoly. However, it is difficult to measure the cost of production so whether dumping is taking 11 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics place is difficult to determine. And charging a different export price than domestic price is not necessarily evidence of dumping because firms often sell goods and services for different prices in different markets. Saves jobs: The argument that trade protection saves jobs is flawed. International trade changes the type of jobs in an economy, but it does not decrease employment in the aggregate because jobs lost in one sector are offset by jobs created in other sectors. Allows us to compete with cheap foreign labor: The argument that trade protection allows us to compete with cheap foreign labor is flawed. Differences in real wage rates generally reflect differences in productivity and to think about competitiveness, we must consider both differences in wages and differences in productivity. Brings diversity and stability: The argument that trade protection brings diversity and stability is flawed. Big rich countries are already diversified. And smaller countries can use the proceeds to trade to invest in a variety of other nations and thereby increase diversity. Penalizes lax environmental standards: The argument that trade l i be r a l i z a t i onl e a dst oa“ r a c e -to-the-bot t om”i ne nvi r onme nt a ls t a nda r dsi s weak. Many poorer countries have comparable environmental standards and should not be targeted. And environmental standards are positively related to income (they are a normal good). The best way to encourage improved environmental standards is to allow trade and the economic benefits it brings to poorer countries. But using free trade agreements such as CAFTA to help negotiate policies that avoid irreversible harm to resources such as rain forests might be useful. Why Is International Trade Restricted? Despite arguments against protection, trade is still restricted because key economic interests benefit from protection. Rent Seeking: Rent seeking is lobbying and other political activity that seek to capture the gains from trade. While the benefits from liberalized trade are large in the aggregate, they are widespread across all consumers. Meanwhile, the costs are concentrated on a smaller number of producers. It is in the interests of those who pay the costs of liberalized trade to undertake a large quantity of political lobbying to promote protection. 12 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Chaps 9 Externalities: Pollution, Education, and Health Care CHAPTER ROADMAP What ’ sNe wi nt hi sEdi t i on? The emphasis on health care as an example of a product with an external benefit has been increased. The discussion of the health care market has been expanded, with a new section discussing asymmetric information in the health-care insurance market and a health-c a r er e f or m pr opos a lus i ngvouc he r s .Ane wEy eon“ Educ a t i on Qua l i t y :Cha r t e rSc hool sa ndVouc he r s ”ha sbe e na dde d. Where We Are We use the demand and supply curves to show how externalities affect the efficient use of resources. We see that external costs result in overproduction and that external benefits result in underproduction. By developing the marginal social cost curve and marginal social benefit curve, we incorporate these external costs and external benefits into the basic demand-supply graph. Finally, we investigate how the government intervenes in the market to promote efficient use of resources. Whe r eWe ’ veBe e n We ’ vee xpl or e dt hei nt e r a c t i onso fs uppl ya ndde ma ndt ha tbr i nga boutt hee f f i c i e nt use of resources by equating marginal benefit to marginal cost. We use the concept of efficiency in this chapter to discuss the deadweight loss from externalities and how government action can overcome the inefficiency. Whe r eWe ’ r eGoi ng After this chapter, the focus turns to exploring the supply curve in greater de t ai l .Thene xtc hapt e rl ooksataf i r m’ spr oduc t i onc hoi c e s .Weal s o examine its costs and its cost curves in the short run and in the long run. CHAPTER LECTURE 9.1 Negative Externalities: Pollution Externalities in Our Daily Lives An externality is a cost or benefit that arises from production and falls on someone other than the producer, or a cost or benefit that arises from consumption and falls on someone other than the consumer. A negative externality imposes an external cost and a positive externality creates an external benefit. There are four types of externalities: 13 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Negative Production Externalities: noise from aircraft and trucks, polluted rivers and lakes, the destruction of native animal habitat, air pollution in major cities from auto exhaust. Positive Production Externalities: honey and fruit production, in which fruit production gets an external benefit from locating bee hives next to a fruit orchard, where the bees pollinate the trees to boost fruit output and honey production gets an external benefit from the orchard trees that generate the pollen necessary for honey production. Negative Consumption Externalities: smoking in a confined space and posing a health risk to others, or having noisy parties or loud car stereos that disturb others. Positive Consumption Externalities, flu vaccination because everyone who comes into contact with the person benefits because they are less likely to catch the flu. Private Costs and Social Costs A private cost of production is a cost that is borne by the producer. Marginal private cost (MC) is the cost of producing an additional unit of a good or service that is borne by the producer of that good or service. An external cost is a cost of producing a good or service that is not borne by the producer but is born by other people. A marginal external cost is the cost of producing an additional unit of a good or service that falls on people other than the producer. Marginal social cost (MSC) is the marginal cost incurred by the entire society—by the producer and by everyone else on whom the cost falls—and is the sum of marginal private cost and marginal external cost: MSC = MC + Marginal external cost. The figure shows the marginal private cost curve (MC) and the marginal social cost curve (MSC) for a good with an external cost. The vertical distance between the two curves is the marginal external cost. Because the marginal social cost includes the marginal external cost, the marginal social cost exceeds the 14 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics marginal private cost (MSC > MC) for all quantities. The efficient quantity of output occurs where the marginal social cost equals marginal benefit, that is, where MSC = MB. In the figure, the efficient quantity is Q1. An unregulated market, however, produces where the MC = MB (which is equivalent to producing where S = D). In the figure, the unregulated market is at Q0. At this level of output, MSC exceeds MB so there is, as illustrated, a deadweight loss. Production and Pollution: How Much? When an industry is unregulated, the amount of pollution it creates depends upon the market equilibrium price and quantity of the good produced. But it is an inefficient equilibrium (see the deadweight loss in the figure above). Therefore, reducing the amount of pollution and eliminating the deadweight loss brings potential gains. In an example of a factory which dumps waste chemical into a river, the people who live near the river experience a negative externality and a deadweight loss. How can the people who live by the polluted river get the chemical factories to decrease output of the chemical and thereby cause less pollution? Can a solution be found that benefits everyone? Solutions can be offered via property rights and the Coase Theorem. Property Rights Property rights are legally established titles to the ownership, use, and disposal of factors of production and goods and services that are enforceable in the courts. Assigning property rights can reduce the inefficiency arising from an externality. The Coase Theorem The Coase theorem is the proposition that if property rights exist, if only a small number of parties are involved, and if the transactions costs are low, then private transactions are efficient. Transactions costs are the opportunity costs of conducting a transaction A remarkable feature of the Coase theorem is that it does not matter if the property right is given to the creators of the externality (the polluters) or to the victims. In either case, the result will be efficient. If the polluters value the benefits from the activity generating the pollution more highly than the victims value being free from the pollution, (that is, the cost of reducing the pollution exceeds the benefit from the reduction) then the efficient outcome is for the pollution to continue. If polluters are assigned the right to pollute, the victims are not able to pay enough to 15 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics convince the polluters to stop. If the victims are assigned the property right to be free from pollution, then the polluters are able to pay the victims sufficient compensation to continue polluting. Either way, the pollution continues. If the victims value the benefits from being free from pollution more highly than the polluters value the benefits of the pollution, (that is, the benefit from reducing pollution exceeds the cost of the reduction) then the efficient outcome is for the pollution to stop. If the polluters are assigned the right to pollute, then the victims are willing to pay the polluters sufficient compensation to stop the pollution. If the victims are assigned the right to be free from pollution, then the polluters are not able to pay the victims enough to allow them to continue polluting. Either way, the pollution stops. Government Actions in the Face of External Costs The government can use pollution limits to achieve an efficient outcome. A quantity limit on a polluting activity will cause the market price to rise, reducing the quantity demanded to an amount that balances MSC and MB. The higher price exceeds MC, which creates producer surplus. In reality, pollution limits are difficult to implement and monitor and the higher price encourages producers to increase their quantity beyond the limit. The government can use pollution charges or taxes that seek an efficient outcome by making a polluter pay the marginal external cost of pollution. By charging or taxing an amount equal to the marginal external cost, the MSC curve becomes the same as the market supply curve. This moves the market to the efficient quantity and the government collects revenue from the charge or tax. In the figure above, the appropriate tax equals the length of the double headed arrow. The government can use marketable pollution permits (or cap-and-trade), wherein pollution rights are assigned or sold to individual producers who are then free to trade permits with each other. The market in permits determines the price of a permit and firms will buy or sell permits until their marginal cost of pollution reduction equals the price of a permit. All of these methods have the potential to achieve an efficient outcome if the marginal external cost is assessed correctly, though that is rarely possible. Moreover, some producers have a lower marginal cost of avoiding pollution than others, but pollution limits and pollution charges/taxes confront all producers with the same incentives to avoid pollution. Cap-and-trade ends up being a more effective government policy in practice because it provides the 16 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics strongest available incentive to individual producers to find cost effective technologies that achieve pollution targets. 9.2 Positive Externalities: Education and Health Care Private Benefits and Social Benefits A private benefit is a benefit that the consumer of a good or service receives. Marginal private benefit (MB) is the benefit from an additional unit of a good or service that the consumer of that good or service receives. An external benefit from a good or service is a benefit that someone other than the consumer receives. A marginal external benefit is the benefit from an additional unit of a good or service that people other than the consumer of that good or service enjoy. Marginal social benefit (MSB) is the marginal benefit enjoyed by the entire society—by the consumer and by everyone else who enjoys a benefit—and is the sum of marginal private benefit and marginal external benefit: MSB = MB + Marginal external benefit. The figure shows the marginal private benefit curve (MB) and the marginal social benefit curve (MSB) for a good with an external benefit. The vertical distance between the two curves equals the marginal external benefit. For instance, the length of the arrow in the figure equals the marginal external benefit at the quantity Q1. Because marginal social benefit includes marginal external benefit, the marginal social benefit exceeds the marginal private benefit (MSB > MB) for all quantities. The efficient quantity of output occurs where the marginal social benefit equals marginal cost, that is, where MSB = MC. In the figure, the efficient quantity is Q1. An unregulated market produces where the MC = MB (which is equivalent to producing where S = D). In the figure, the unregulated market equilibrium is Q0. At this level of output, MSB exceeds MC so there is, as illustrated in the figure, a deadweight loss. 17 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics Government Actions in the Face of External Benefits Public provision, which is when a public authority that receives its revenue from the government produces the good or service. (Public schools, colleges, and universities are examples.) In this case, the government can direct the authority to produce the efficient quantity. A subsidy, is a payment that the government makes to a producer to cover part of the cost of production, can be used. If the government pays the producer a subsidy equal to the marginal external benefit, then the quantity produced by the private firm increases to that at which the marginal cost equals the marginal social benefit and an efficient allocation of resources occurs. In the figure, the correct subsidy is equal to the length of the double headed arrow. A voucher, which is a token that the government provides to households to buy specified goods or services, can be used. Households receiving a voucher effectively have a greater income to be used for the specific good or service, which increases their demand and increases the quantity consumed. Both public provision and private subsidies may fail to ultimately provide an efficient outcome due to bureaucratic cost padding and overprovision. Advocates of vouchers argue that giving financial resources to the consumer rather than the producer will produce a more efficient outcome as consumers may monitor performance more effectively than the government will. Economic Problems in Health-Care Markets Health care can be divided into two markets: the health-insurance care services market and the health-care insurance market. Problems in each lead to underprovision. Health-care services: Vaccination and public sanitation provide positive consumption externalities. (For instance, flu vaccination protects the pe r s onr e c e i vi ngt hes hotbuta l s opr ot e c t sa l loft hepe r s on’ sf r i e ndsf r om catching flu from the person.) With these external benefits, the marginal social benefit of health care exceeds the marginal private benefit, causing the unregulated market equilibrium to be inefficiently less than the efficient quantity. Health-care insurance: Asymmetric information is a major problem in the health care market. People know more about their health than does the insurance company and doctors know more about the treatment that should be prescribed and the cost than does the insurance company. Asymmetric 18 2016-2017 EOC101 Economics information means that an unregulated health-care insurance market equilibrium will have an inefficiently small quantity of health insurance. Currently, a mix of public provision and private subsidies are used to increase the quantity of health care in the U.S., though many people believe the level still falls short of the efficient quantity. These government actions may reduce deadweight loss, but are inadequate to eliminate it entirely. Health care reform aims to increase the quantity of services towards the efficient outcome and also increase equality of access to those services as well as control the costs of providing those services. 19
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz