JMI_1007.fm Page 109 Friday, January 4, 2002 6:14 PM Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 205, Pt 1 January 2002, pp. 109 – 112 Received 26 October 2001; accepted 3 December 2001 SHOR T COMMUNICATION Blackwell Science Ltd Fluorescence localization after photobleaching (FLAP): a new method for studying protein dynamics in living cells fluorescence localization after photobleaching G. A. DUNN*, I. M. DOBBIE†, J. MONYPENNY†, M. R. HOLT* & D. ZICHA† *MRC Muscle and Cell Motility Unit, The Randall Centre, New Hunt’s House, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK †Light Microscopy, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK Key words. Actin, cell motility, CFP, FLIP, fluorescence microscopy, FRAP, GFP, laser scanning confocal microscopy, photobleaching, YFP. Summary FLAP is a new method for localized photo-labelling and subsequent tracking of specific molecules within living cells. It is simple in principle, easy to implement and has a wide potential application. The molecule to be located carries two fluorophores: one to be photobleached and the other to act as a reference label. Unlike the related methods of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP), the use of a reference fluorophore permits the distribution of the photo-labelled molecules themselves to be tracked by simple image differencing. In effect, FLAP is therefore comparable with methods of photoactivation. Its chief advantage over the method of caged fluorescent probes is that it can be used to track chimaeric fluorescent proteins directly expressed by the cells. Although methods are being developed to track fluorescent proteins by direct photoactivation, these still have serious drawbacks. In order to demonstrate FLAP, we have used nuclear microinjection of cDNA fusion constructs of β-actin with yellow (YFP) and cyan (CFP) fluorescent proteins to follow both the fast relocation dynamics of monomeric (globular) G-actin and the much slower dynamics of filamentous F-actin simultaneously in living cells. Introduction Transfection of cells with cDNA constructs containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene has revolutionized the study of protein dynamics within living cells (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 2001; Misteli, 2001), yet its further development has been hampered by a lack of effective methods for activating the Correspondence: Graham A. Dunn. E-mail: [email protected] © 2002 The Royal Microscopical Society fluorescence in a localized manner. In particular, the well established technique of photo-decaging fluorescent probes to photo-label selected molecules (Theriot & Mitchison, 1992; McGrath et al., 1998; Mitchison et al., 1998) cannot be applied to fluorescent proteins directly expressed by the cells. Recent approaches to solving this critical problem have centred on methods for photoactivating GFP directly, either to change its fluorescence spectra (Elowitz et al., 1997) or to enhance its blue-excited fluorescence (Yokoe & Meyer, 1996). Unfortunately, the first method requires conditions of low oxygen concentration that are generally incompatible with maintaining physiological conditions in cell cultures, whereas the second merely enhances the signal and cannot provide unambiguous localization of photoactivated molecules. Here we have taken a different approach based on the fact that GFP and its variants are well suited to photobleaching. The methods of FRAP and FLIP have been successfully applied to cells transfected with GFP fusion constructs (Cole et al., 1996; White & Stelzer, 1999; Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 2001; Reits & Neefjes, 2001) and have permitted the dynamics of the remaining unbleached molecules to be studied. Our proposed FLAP method is simply an extension of this approach, which allows continued tracking of the bleached molecules as well as the unbleached ones. This is achieved by tagging the molecules to be tracked with two different fluorophores and bleaching just one of them in a localized region of the cell. If care is taken to ensure accurate matching of the two signals before bleaching, the population of molecules exposed to bleaching is thereafter unambiguously identified as those in which the two signal strengths differ. Basic image processing can reveal the distribution of this population of photo-labelled molecules and an additional advantage over photoactivation methods is that information on the distribution of the unbleached molecules is also readily available. JMI_1007.fm Page 110 Friday, January 4, 2002 6:14 PM 110 G. A. DUNN ET AL. For the FLAP method to work optimally, the two fluorophores should be excited together and imaged simultaneously. If the emission spectra overlap too much to be easily separated, a satisfactory compromise is to switch the two excitation channels line-by-line during a single frame scan using a confocal microscope equipped with acousto-optical tunable filters. Materials and methods Cell culture and microinjection Transformed rat fibroblasts (a gift from Dr Pavel Vesely) were seeded on 18 × 18 mm coverslips in Hank’s Minimum Essential Medium containing 10% bovine serum. DNA constructs were microinjected into cell nuclei using an Eppendorf Transjector and micromanipulator system mounted on a Zeiss Axiovert 35. Cells were ready for use after allowing 2–3 h for expression of the constructs. frames were collected, then the 514 nm laser line was used at maximum power (measured as 1.32 mW) to scan the bleach region for 3–15 s and the time-lapse sequence was resumed immediately afterwards. Image processing The image of the FLAP signal was obtained by subtracting the image of the photobleached fluor from that of the unbleached fluor. Smoothing of the two input images (5 × 5 pixel averaging) was used to reduce noise in the FLAP image. Fading of the two fluorophores was minimal and well balanced during the sequences shown here and was not compensated for, although compensation would be required if fading were rapid or unbalanced. Post-processing of the FLAP image consisted of thresholding to remove background pixel noise and mapping the grey levels onto a pseudocolour scale. The threshold level was chosen to reduce noise to an acceptable level in the pre-bleach FLAP images and then kept constant for all images in the sequence. DNA constructs Separate constructs encoding yellow and cyan N-terminal fluorescent proteins were cloned from a β-actin construct (a gift from Dr John Copeland) using pECFP-C1 and pEYFP-C1 vectors (ClonTech, Palo Alto, CA, USA). They were co-injected at a concentration of 0.1 µg µL–1 each. Microscopy Images were recorded using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510) equipped with a 37 °C temperaturecontrolled hood and a 63 × Plan-Apochromat NA 1.4 pH 3 oil objective. The CFP and YFP channels used 458 nm and 514 nm lines of an argon laser for excitation and a phase contrast image was recorded simultaneously with the CFP channel. A 545 nm dichroic mirror was used to split the two emission channels, followed by a bandpass 475–525 nm filter for the CFP channel and a long pass 530 nm filter for the YFP channel. In each case the pinhole was set such that the optical slice was indicated as 3 µm by the LSM 510 software. Each image line was scanned twice at the highest scan rate (0.64 µs pixel–1) using multi-tracking mode, first by the 514 nm laser line with the YFP channel detector active and then by the 458 nm laser line with the CFP detector and the transmission phase-contrast detector active. Alternatively, we have found that simultaneous imaging of CFP and YFP is possible using 458 nm illumination to excite both fluors. Before starting a recording sequence, a rectangular image capture region and a much smaller bleach region (a strip 2 µm wide or a circle 3–10 µm diameter) were positioned on the selected cell. The gain and offset for each fluorescence channel were optimized so that the two images were closely matched without saturation. The time-lapse (bleach) mode of the Zeiss LSM510 was then used to collect sequential images. Five or 10 Results After allowing the β-actin constructs to become expressed, confocal microscopy revealed that the two fluorophores were accurately co-localized within the cells and thus that the intensity difference – the FLAP signal – was close to zero throughout the image (Fig. 1(c) and (e)). Photobleaching the YFP in a narrow strip traversing the lamella of a transformed rat fibroblast (Fig. 1(a) and (b)) gave rise to a strong FLAP signal (Fig. 1d), which is shown encoded in pseudocolour (Fig. 1f ). The selected cell had prominent microfilament bundles or stress fibres (Fig. 1a) and the FLAP signal revealed that a variety of dynamic activities were taking place. Immediately after bleaching, a diffuse low-level signal had uniformly filled the local cytoplasm of the cell but had not managed to pass the cell nucleus. A much stronger signal was confined to the microfilament bundles but even this had migrated along the bundles some 1–2 µm away from the nucleus and 2 –3 µm towards the nucleus during the 4 s bleach period (Fig. 1f ). In order to confine our initial studies to simpler examples of actin dynamics, we concentrated on spot bleaching of three types of actin structure in cells lacking prominent stress fibres. We repeatedly observed three distinct patterns of behaviour of the FLAP signal during the 3–4 min subsequent to bleaching. If the bleach spot were located in a region of high actin concentration in the lamella of the cell (Fig. 2(a) –(c)), the FLAP signal usually showed rapid dispersal and, in the case of this particular cell, it had spread through most of the cytoplasm during the 8 s bleach period (Fig. 2a). Subsequently, the signal accumulated in another region of high actin concentration (Fig. 2b – arrow) and was little changed by 100 s after bleaching (Fig. 2c). Another pattern was revealed when the bleach spot was located in an active ruffling region at the leading edge (Fig. 2(d)–(f )). In this case there was little or no general © 2002 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 205, 109– 112 JMI_1007.fm Page 111 Friday, January 4, 2002 6:14 PM F LUORESCENCE LOCALIZATION AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING 111 Fig. 1. Transformed rat fibroblast showing simultaneously acquired CFP (a) and YFP (b) images immediately after photobleaching the lamella in a narrow strip (white rectangle). Intensity profiles integrated between the grey lines before (c) and after (d) photobleaching show CFP (cyan), YFP (yellow) and FLAP (red) signals. The FLAP images corresponding to the profiles (c) and (d) are shown encoded in pseudocolour in (e) and (f ). Bleach time 3.8 s. Scale bar 10 µm. Fig. 2. Three image sequences show the FLAP image in pseudocolour (left panel) and phase-contrast image (right panel) at the following times after bleaching: 0 s (a, d and g), 50 s (b and e), 100 s (c, f and h) and 200 s (i). In these sequences the individual channels were acquired in multi-tracking mode. Bleach region shown as a circle in each image. Threshold level set to 8% of maximum signal. Bleach times 8.6 s (a) and 13.5 s (d and g). Scale bars 10 µm. dispersal of the FLAP signal, although it had usually filled the local ruffle system immediately after bleaching (Fig. 2d). During the subsequent 50 s the signal migrated laterally, spreading into more distant ruffles along the leading edge (Fig. 2(e) and (f )) and tended to persist locally longer than in the first type of pattern. A third distinct pattern was associated with © 2002 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 205, 109–112 denser accumulations of expressed actin found often in the perinuclear region of the cell (Fig. 2(g) –(i)). When the same cell was targeted in this region, 10 min after the last sequence, the FLAP signal remained precisely localized on the bleach spot and showed no discernible dispersal and very little decay during the 4 min recorded sequence. JMI_1007.fm Page 112 Friday, January 4, 2002 6:14 PM 112 G. A. DUNN ET AL. Discussion It is apparent from these images that the FLAP method will prove useful for shedding light on the dynamics of actin as well as other proteins of the cytoskeleton. Other studies have shown that GFP and its variants, when tagged to actin, do not appear to affect significantly its polymerization or other interactions (Choidas et al., 1998; Fischer et al., 1998). The rapid initial diffusion of part of the signal in Figs 1(f ) and 2(a) indicates that a considerable portion of the targets must have contained G-actin, possibly associated with an actin-binding protein such as profilin or β-thymosin. Our measurements indicate that the total signal, integrated over the cell, does not decay, although dispersal of the signal causes more of it to fall below the threshold. In the case of the second type of behaviour, the mobility of the FLAP signal is too slow for freely diffusing Gactin but probably too fast for crosslinked actin filaments. Thus, the relatively high mobility of the FLAP signal in ruffles may indicate freely mobile oligomeric actin filaments or it could be due to some form of G-actin that is not entirely free to diffuse, possibly because it is associated in some way with the membrane. The third type of behaviour suggests that the perinuclear actin is either sequestered and/or crosslinked, and this experiment also serves as a control to show that bleaching is truly confined to the defined bleach region when there is little or no translocation of the actin. It is interesting that the stress fibres shown by the cell in Fig. 1 are not as stable as this perinuclear actin, as a strong signal had migrated well outside the bleach region, along the filament bundles, immediately after bleaching. The questions raised by these observations will all require much more detailed studies of specific systems before they can be resolved. Longer recording periods will be needed to observe dynamic changes in the more stable regions of the cytoskeleton and faster sampling rates (with correspondingly reduced imaging regions) to follow the diffusion of G-actin. Future improvements to the method will accrue from having both fluorophores on the same molecule and imaging both channels simultaneously. This would reduce fluorescence ‘speckle’ noise in the FLAP signal, thus increasing the signal-tonoise ratio and hence the sensitivity of the method. Although multi-tracking provides lower crosstalk between channels, we have shown that simultaneous imaging of CFP and YFP is possible using 458 nm illumination to excite both fluors (Fig. 1). Double constructs of GFP variants coupled by linker sequences have been made for fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies (Pollok & Heim, 1999) and we are currently producing a CFP-YFP-actin construct. Although there is no evidence of FRET in the current study (there is no enhancement of the CFP signal when the YFP is bleached), CFP and YFP are known to be an efficient FRET pair when closely linked on the same molecule (Pollok & Heim, 1999). This may prove to be advantageous for FLAP if the FRET acceptor is the one chosen to be bleached: bleaching would then enhance the brightness of the donor and thus increase the FLAP signal. Even when not using fluorescent proteins, FLAP may yet prove to have significant advantages over the method of caged fluorescent probes. It is much easier to implement on confocal or conventional fluorescent microscopes, it avoids exposing the cells to harmful UV irradiation, and it can reveal the distribution of all the fluorescent molecules – not only those that have been photolabelled. Directly coupled pairs of fluorescent dyes, chosen to have suitable FRET properties and well separated emission spectra for simultaneous imaging, could be specially synthesized for conjugation with biologically relevant molecules to be used in FLAP experiments. Synthetic dyes will have much greater versatility than fluorescent proteins for multichannel FLAP applications. Acknowledgement We thank Dr C. Gray (ICRF) for help with tissue culture and microinjection. Supplementary material Movies showing these behaviour patterns are available at the following web address: http://www.blackwell-science.com/ products/journals/suppmat/JMS/JMS1007/JMS1007.htm. References Choidas, A., Jungbluth, A., Sechi, A., Murphy, J., Ullrich, A. & Marriott, G. (1998) The suitability and application of a GFP-actin fusion protein for long-term imaging of the organization and dynamics of the cytoskeleton in mammalian cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 77, 81–90. Cole, N.B., Smith, C.L., Sciaky, N., Terasaki, M., Edidin, M. & LippincottSchwartz, J. (1996) Diffusional mobility of Golgi proteins in membranes of living cells. Science, 273, 797– 801. Elowitz, M.B., Surette, M.G., Wolf, P., Stock, J. & Leibler, S. (1997) Photoactivation turns green fluorescent protein red. Current Biol. 7, 809–812. Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Knutti, D. & Matus, A. (1998) Rapid actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. Neuron, 20, 847–854. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Snapp, E. & Kenworthy, A. (2001) Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 444–456. McGrath, J.L., Tardy, Y., Dewey,C.F., Jr, Meister, J.J. & Hartwig, J.H. (1998) Simultaneous measurements of actin filament turnover, filament fraction, and monomer diffusion in endothelial cells. Biophys. J. 75, 2070–2078. Misteli, T. (2001) Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science, 291, 843– 847. Mitchison, T.J., Sawin, K.E., Theriot, J.A., Gee, K. & Mallavarapu, A. (1998) Caged fluorescent probes. Meth. Enzymol. 291, 63–78. Pollok, B.A. & Heim, R. (1999) Using GFP in FRET-based applications. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 57 – 60. Reits, E.A.J. & Neefjes, J.J. (2001) From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells. Nature Cell Biol. 3, E145–E147. Theriot, J.A. & Mitchison, T.J. (1992) Comparison of actin and cell surface dynamics in motile fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 119, 367–377. White, J. & Stelzer, E.H. (1999) Photobleaching GFP reveals protein dynamics inside live cells. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 61–65. Yokoe, H. & Meyer, T. (1996) Spatial dynamics of GFP-tagged proteins investigated by local fluorescence enhancement. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 1252 –1256. © 2002 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 205, 109– 112
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz