T HE O PTIMAL FOREIGN RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA µ Ana Maria Ceh, Ivo Krznar HNB June 25 (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 1 / 12 T HE MAIN QUESTIONS What is the optimal level of foreign reserves the CNB should hold? Are CNB foreign reserves su¢ cient to mitigate negative e¤ects of potential sudden stop and banking crisis? Is there a rationale for recent hoarding of foreign reserves in Croatia? Since 1998 CNB foreign reserves have increased by four times Do we have too much of a good thing? How do optimal reserves compare to "standard" indicators of reserves adequacy? (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 2 / 12 M OTIVATION Optimal reserves take into account bene…ts and costs from holding reserves Bene…ts: precautionary motives or self-insurance against double drain risk in dollarized economies (future sudden stops accompanied with banking crises) foreign reserves act as an insurance against negative e¤ects of a sudden stop and a key tool for managing domestic …nancial sector stability 300 Public sector short-term debt Private sector short-term debt Euro deposits 250 % 200 150 100 50 0 1998 (HNB) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA 2006 2007 J UNE 25 3 / 12 M OTIVATION Costs: opportunity costs from holding reserves (investing into high yield assets, repaying external debt) Inadequate "standard" indicators of reserves adequacy (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 4 / 12 T HE MODEL A simple dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with 3 sectors (households/…rms, private banks, government/central bank) The only source of uncertainty comes from probability of sudden stop that occurs in tandem with banking crisis During crisis short-term foreign loans of every sector are not rolled over, GDP falls by some fraction, kuna/euro exchange rate depreciates, a part of kuna deposits (both household and corporate) is exchanged for euro deposits, a bank run occurs - a fraction of overall deposits of non-…nancial sector is withdrawn from banks, banks and households withdraw their foreign liquid assets from abroad to use them as a bu¤er against a sudden stop (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 5 / 12 G OVERNMENT /C ENTRAL BANK AS A S OCIAL P LANNER Maximizing the welfare of the economy by choosing optimal level of foreign reserves Precautionary motives of demand for foreign reserves Balancing between Bene…ts of holding reserves substituting lost access to market for short term foreign debt easing credit crunch by providing foreign liquidity during bank run AND Costs of holding reserves reserves earn low return (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 6 / 12 O PTIMAL RESERVES Optimal reserves will increase with short-term external debt possible foreign deposits withdrawal output loss, probability of sudden stop, and exchange rate depreciation Optimal reserves will decrease with their costs high alternative bu¤er (foreign liquid assets of private sector) Relation with Greenspan-Guidotti rule? (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 7 / 12 O PTIMAL AND A CTUAL RESERVES The model was calibrated on 1998/1999 sudden stop with banking crisis 10,000 Actual Reserves Optimal Reserves (LOR) Optimal Reserves 8,000 mil. EUR 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 -2,000 1998 (HNB) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA 2005 2006 2007 J UNE 25 8 / 12 S TRUCTURE OF O PTIMAL R ESERVES Decomposition of optimal reserves where mother banks act as a lender of last resort 15,000 12,000 mil. EUR 9,000 6,000 3,000 0 -3,000 -6,000 1998 1999 2000 Output loss Foreign assets Optimal reserves (HNB) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 External debt Possible deposit withdrawal O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 9 / 12 C OMPARISON OF S TANDARD I NDICATORS AND O PTIMAL RESERVES 10,000 Actual Reserves Optimal Reserves (LOR) Greenspan-Guidotti Rule 3-Month Imports Rule 8,000 mil. EUR 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 -2,000 1998 (HNB) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA 2005 2006 2007 J UNE 25 10 / 12 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 m il. EU R m il. EU R C OMPARISON OF S TANDARD I NDICATORS AND O PTIMAL RESERVES 6,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 Optimal Reseves (LOR) Actual Reserves Greenspan-Guidotti Rule 3-Month Imports Rule 2,000 0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 Optimal Reseves (LOR) Actual Reserves Greenspan-Guidotti Rule 3-Month Imports Rule 2,000 0 0 (HNB) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Deposit withdrawal (%) Output loss (%) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 11 / 12 C ONCLUSION Precautionary demand for foreign reserves might explain recent increase in CNB reserves The di¤erence between actual and optimal reserves depends crucially on the expected reaction of the mother banks during the crisis The CNB is holding enough foreign reserves to …ght the possible crisis of the 1998/1999 magnitude regardless of the mother banks’reaction Using the two standard indicators of foreign reserves adequacy might be misleading in assessing foreign reserves optimality (HNB) O PTIMAL RESERVES : C ASE OF C ROATIA J UNE 25 12 / 12
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz