Historical and Geographical Context POL3: Intro to IR Question to ask yourself How useful is historical analysis to understand current international politics? I. Peace of Westphalia Treaties of Westphalia (1648) ended Thirty Years War Created modern international system 1) Established sovereignty Sovereignty: absolute and perpetual power vested in the state Internal: sovereign has exclusive rights within its territory e.g. in regards to domestic policies, government type, and region External: principle of noninterference 2) Established professional national militaries 3) Formed new set of Great Powers Austria, England, France, Netherlands, Prussia, Russia Centralization leads to growth of military power and states Europe post-Westphalia II. Revolutions American (1776) and French (1789) revolutions wrought changes 1) Legitimacy of rule consent and social contract (Locke) 2) Nationalism e.g. Napoleonic Wars and the Grande Armee Europe, 1815 III. th 19 Century Europe Concert of Europe: five powers Austria, England, France, Prussia, Russia Colonization and European “rule” of world Motivations: economic, political, cultural Congress of Berlin (1885) Balance of power Bismarck and diplomacy “alliances of convenience” and the fear of hegemony Logic of balance: increase costs of war African Colonization World Colonization, 1914 Breakdown Erosion of the Concert of Europe 1) Solidification of alliances German unification Triple Alliance and Dual Alliance Britain no longer “balancer” 2) Russo-Japanese War (1905) European alliances prior to WWI IV. WWI and Interwar Years WWI (1914-1918) Total war, unconventional weapons, new technologies Russian Revolution (1917) Peace of Versailles Breakup of empires Austria-Hungary, Ottoman, Germany Interwar Years (1919-1939) League of Nations Soviet Union U.S. isolationism Unchallenged conquests Japan in Manchuria/China (1931/37) and Italy in Ethiopia (1935) International aggression and US isolationism V. World War II 1939-1945 Uneasy alliance: West and USSR Warfare Total war and industrialization Strategic and unrestricted bombing Civilians and genocide End of war A-bomb Redistribution of power Territorial changes Creation of United Nations Deaths inWWII Mushroom cloud over Hiroshima, 1945 VI. Cold War 1945-1989 Two superpowers: USA and USSR Bipolar international system Decline of Europe as epicenter Incompatibilities between superpowers 1) Geopolitics Each had their sphere of influence System of alliances: NATO vs. Warsaw Pact 2) Ideologies Democratic liberalism vs. Communism US policy of containment Decolonization A New Balance of Power Cold War Communist advances (1949) Nuclear armed USSR Mao-led victory in China US fears communist spread (i.e. “domino effect”) Sino-Soviet split (1960) Arms race weapons/bomber/missile gap, and MAD Globalization of conflict through proxy wars Korea (1950-53) Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) Vietnam (1965-1975) Middle East (1967, 1973) Afghanistan (1979) Moments from the Cold War Khrushchev visits the U.S. Time exposure of 8 multiple independently retargeted re-entry vehicles (MIRV) Cold War Détente Nixon visits China (1972) Summits (e.g. SALT) End of Cold War Glasnost and perestroika Fall of Berlin Wall (1989) A long “peace” Deterrence Balance of power Economic hegemony of U.S. Economic liberalism Kissinger with Zhou Enlai and Mao Zedong. Sadat, Carter, and Begin Richard Nixon with Leonid Brezhnev Taking down the BerlinWall VII. post-Cold War Unipolar international system 1991 Gulf War Multilateral engagement Chinese reforms Civil and ethnic conflict e.g. Rwanda (1994) New role for NATO? Development of EU Russian economic performance VIII. 21st Century War on Terrorism 9/11 and Afghanistan 2003 Iraq War Nuclear North Korea (2006) 2008 Financial Crisis Arab Spring Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Bahrain Eastern Europe: EU v. Russia spheres of influence Pacific: Chinese v. American spheres of influence IX. Non-Western Views Chinese hegemony (pre-19th Century) Sino-centric system of hierarchy Physical and moral tribute to gain legitimacy Westphalia vs. Sino-centric systems Sovereignty and equality of states Hierarchy and “non-interference” 19th Century responses in Asia Chinese v. Japanese responses (Krasner 2001) Small group discussion With a small group (2-3 students): Does historical analysis lead to false comparisons and poor policies, or does it illuminate the causes of important features of contemporary international relations? If the former, can you give examples of this? If the latter, how useful might foreign policies based on historical knowledge and comparison be? X. Regions of IR Global IR vs. Regional IR North-South Gap: difference between industrialized countries of the North and relatively poor countries of the South Developed vs. developing/LDCs First/Second world vs. “third world” Major regions: States have global and regional priorities and relationships Weight varies by state North-South Gap Major Regions U.S. Areas of Responsibility *Taken from US Department of State website, January 4, 2015
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz