Annals of Botany 105: 939 –955, 2010
doi:10.1093/aob/mcq075, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org
A new look at sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana and the hidden
side of development
Nina I. Gabarayeva 1,*, Valentina V. Grigorjeva 1 and John R. Rowley 2
1
Komarov Botanical Institute, Popov st. 2, 197376, St.-Petersburg, Russia and 2Stockholm University, Botanical Institute,
SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
* For correspondence. E-mail [email protected]
Received: 5 December 2009 Returned for revision: 11 February 2010 Accepted: 22 February 2010 Published electronically: 17 April 2010
† Background and Aims The phenomenon of self-assembly, widespread in both the living and the non-living
world, is a key mechanism in sporoderm pattern formation. Observations in developmental palynology appear
in a new light if they are regarded as aspects of a sequence of micellar colloidal mesophases at genomically controlled initial parameters. The exine of Persea is reduced to ornamentaion (spines and gemmae with underlying
skin-like ectexine); there is no endexine. Development of Persea exine was analysed based on the idea that ornamentation of pollen occurs largely by self-assembly.
† Methods Flower buds were collected from trees grown in greenhouses over 11 years in order to examine all the
main developmental stages, including the very short tetrad period. After fixing, sections were examined using
transmission electron microscopy.
† Key Results and Conclusions The locations of future spines are determined by lipid droplets in invaginations of
the microspore plasma membrane. The addition of new sporopollenin monomers into these invaginations leads to
the appearance of chimeric polymersomes, which, after splitting into two individual assemblies, give rise to both
liquid-crystal conical ‘skeletons’ of spines and spherical micelles. After autopolymerization of sporopollenin,
spines emerge around their skeletons, nested into clusters of globules. These clusters and single globules
between spines appear on a base of spherical micelles. The intine also develops on the base of micellar mesophases. Colloidal chemistry helps to provide a more general understanding of the processes and explains recurrent
features of pollen walls from remote taxa.
Key words: Sporoderm development, exine, sporopollenin, self-assembly, micelles, liquid crystals, Persea
americana.
IN T RO DU C T IO N
The exine of Persea americana is reduced to ornamentation,
consisting of spines and gemmae between spines (Hesse and
Kubitzki, 1983). The participation of processes of selfassembly in exine development has been suggested
(Collinson et al., 1993; Gabarayeva, 1993, 2000; Gabarayeva
and Hemsley, 2006; Hemsley and Gabarayeva, 2007). One
of the main suggestions in these studies is that the surface
ornamentation of pollen grains appears almost by pure selfassembly, via autopolymerization of receptor-independent
sporopollenin. It is reasonable to try to verify this hypothesis
in Persea, which has an almost exineless sporoderm with a
skin-like layer of ectexine and ornamentation – the only
retained part of the exine.
glycocalyx, at pH 7.4, 20 8C, for 24 h. After post-fixation in
2 % osmium tetroxide (20 8 C, 4 h) and acetone dehydration,
the samples were embedded in a mixture of Epon and
Araldite. Ultrathin sections were contrasted with a saturated
solution of uranyl acetate in ethanol and 0.2 % lead citrate.
Sections were examined with a Hitachi H-600 transmission
electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
An aniline blue-induced fluorescent test (Smith and
McCully, 1978) was used to reveal callose; sections were
examined with an Olympus BX 51 epifluorescence microscope. To assay for the possible presence of acid polysaccharides around the tetrad microspores, a cytochemical test was
applied (Thiéry, 1967) with controls (Courtoy and Simar,
1974). To detect the plasma membrane and its glycocalyx
(glycoproteins), sections were stained with phosphotungstic
acid in 10 % chromic acid (Roland et al., 1972).
MAT E RI AL A ND M E T HO DS
Flower buds of Persea americana Mill. were collected from
the greenhouses of the Komarov Botanical Institute,
St.-Petersburg, over 11 years in order to examine all the
main developmental stages, including a very short tetrad
period. Material was fixed in 3 % glutaraldehyde and 2.5 %
sucrose in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, with addition of lanthanum
nitrate (4 %) for better preservation of the plasma membrane
R E S ULT S
Pre-tetrad stage
Sporogenous cells with angular outlines are present in the loculus
of the anther and several tapetal cells (Fig. 1A). A few tightly
packed sporogenous cells are observed in anther cross-sections.
Binucleate tapetal cells have very dense cytoplasm and show
# The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email: [email protected]
940
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
C
F I G . 1. Pre-tetrad stage in Persea americana. (A) Sporogenous cells (SC) with angular outlines inside the anther loculus and neighbouring tapetal cells (Ta).
Two-nuclei tapetal cells show much stronger contrast than sporogenous cells. Plastids with well-formed starch grains (P). (B) Synaptonemal complexes in prophase
(leptotene–zygotene) of meiosis (arrows) in microspore mother cell (MMC). The angular outlines of the cells persist. (C, D) Small droplets of an osmiophilic substance on the surface of MMCs (arrows). Some autolytic vacuoles (AV), containing needle-like crystals, are scattered through the MMC cytoplasm (C). Scale bars:
(A, B) ¼ 2 mm; (C, D) ¼ 1 mm.
much greater contrast than sporogenous cells (Fig. 1A). A large
nucleus occupies the central part of sporogenous cells; an
unusual feature of sporogenous cells is the presence of multiple
plastids with well-formed starch grains. Another unusual
feature is that microspore mother cells (MMCs) entering
meiosis do not become rounded but retain their angular outlines;
the same form persists during meiosis, for instance, in prophase
(leptotene–zygotene) during formation of synaptonemal complexes (Fig. 1B, arrows). Droplets of an osmiophilic substance
on the plasma membrane surface of MMCs are observed inside
small invaginations (Fig. 1C, D, arrows). Some autolytic vacuoles, containing needle-like crystals, are scattered through the
MMC cytoplasm (Fig. 1C).
Tetrad period
This period in P. americana is probably extremely short
(which was why we had been tracking it for 11 years) and
not typical in that the tetrads actually show no callose envelope
and after staining with Aniline blue fluorescence around the
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
941
A
B
C
D
F I G . 2. Early tetrad stage in Persea americana. (A) Close-packed dyads and tetrads in the anther loculus. The initial angular form of sporogenous cells persists
to this stage. (B) One dyad (Dy) in the anther loculus. There is little or no callose around the dyad. (C) A dyad (Dy) and a tetrad (Tet – three microspores are seen
in this section) side by side. There is no callose around them and between the microspores. (D) Magnified upper part of B to show small, strong contrasted
droplets on the plasmalemma surface (arrows). Scale bars ¼ 2 mm.
tetrads or between microspores was not detected. As a result,
the tetrads are not separated from each other and have the
same angular outlines as sporogenous cells and MMCs.
Cytokinesis is successive with centrifugal cleavage in both
meiotic divisions. The planes of division in cytokinesis-II
are perpendicular to each other and a planar (though not
linear) tetrad is generated. It is difficult to distinguish dyads
in sections from obliquely cut tetrads (see the centre of
Fig. 2A, marked Dy), and only in some cases can one definitively visualize a dyad (right part of Fig. 2A, B) or obliquely
cut tetrad (Tet, upper part of Fig. 2A, C). Only in cases
where the plane of section more or less coincides with the
plane of the tetrad can all four microspores be observed
(Fig. 3A, B). Small osmiophilic droplets which accumulate
942
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
C
D
F I G . 3. Control (A, B) and cytochemical tests (C, D). (A, B) Planar tetrads in the process of formation. Cytokinesis is successive with centrifugal cleavage. The planes
of division in cytokinesis-II are perpendicular to each other in a planar tetrad. There are no signs of callose. (C) Cytochemical Thiéry test for acid polysaccharides is
negative. Section unstained. (D) Section stained with phosphotungstic acid in 10 % chromic acid (pH approx. 1). The positive contrasting is indicative of the presence of
traces of glycoproteins in the middle plate, in the thin wall of the former microspore mother cells, and on the plasma membrane of microspores (arrows). Cy, cytosome;
N, nucleus; P, plastid. Scale bars ¼ 2 mm.
on the surface of the plasma membrane are shown in Fig. 2D
(arrows). No acid polysaccharides were observed (Fig. 3C).
Traces of glycoproteins were detected in the middle plate, in
the wall of former MMCs and on the plasma membrane of
microspores (Fig. 3D).
Multiple contacts of the tapetum with dissipating tetrads via
strands are shown in Fig. 4A and B (black arrows). The sites of
osmiophilic substance inside the microspore invaginations
(Fig. 4A, B, thin white arrows) are associated with connective
strands. In the cytoplasm of the tapetal cell (Fig. 4A, upper left
corner) a bundle of hair-like structures is shown (delineated by
thick white arrows); higher magnification reveals the tubular
nature of these structures (Fig. 5A, B, enclosed between
thick black arrows). In Fig. 5B (thin arrow), a tapetal
outgrowth is in contact with high-contrast contents of the
microspore invagination.
Tetrads on the point of disintegration and their close contacts with the tapetum are shown in Fig. 6. The four
members of a planar tetrad are still close to each other, and
they are in the vicinity of the tapetum (Fig. 6A). Periodic invaginations of the microspore plasma membrane are filled with
osmiophilic substance (Fig. 6A – C, thin arrows). The former
tetrads are still in contact with each other (Fig. 6A, thick
arrow). Connective processes between microspores and
tapetal cells persist in many places (Fig. 6B, thick arrows).
If sectioned tangentially, microspore surface invaginations
appear sunken in side view between connective strands (microspore processes; Fig. 6D, thick arrows) and appear circular in
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
943
A
B
F I G . 4. Multiple contacts of the tapetum (Ta) with dissipating tetrads. (A) The sites of contact (arrows) of tapetal cells with the microspore (M) surfaces via
strands. In the cytoplasm of the tapetal cell (upper left corner) a bundle of hair-like structures is delineated by two thick white arrows. Thin white arrows show
multiple periodic invaginations of the microspore plasma membrane, filled with an osmiophilic substance. (B) Note the association of many connective strands
with invaginations of the microspore plasma membrane, filled with osmiophilic substance. AV, autolytic vacuole; Ps, polysomes in tapetal cytoplasm; Tet, tetrad;
N, nucleus. Scale bars ¼ 2 mm.
front view, filled with a dark substance (Fig. 6D, thin arrows).
The microspore surface processes are particularly well seen in
Fig. 6E (thick arrows) in association with dark inclusions
inside surface invaginations (Fig. 6E, thin arrows). The contacts of these processes with tapetal outgrowths are shown in
Fig. 6F (thick arrows).
Free microspore period
The plasma membrane of the young free microspores is regularly invaginated, and the invaginations have a cup-like form
and are filled with osmiophilic droplets (Fig. 7A, B, arrows):
these are sites of future exine spines. Slightly later osmiophilic
contents of the invaginations are no longer homogeneous: some
light vesicular inclusions with internal structure appear
(Fig. 7C). (This phenomenon – the appearance of lighter
areas inside the dark contents of the invaginations – was sometimes observed immediately before tetrad dissipation; see, for
instance, Fig. 6D.) Tangentionally sectioned invaginations
show weakly contrasted vesicles, located at the periphery of
strongly contrasted droplets (Fig. 7C, lower microspore, thick
arrows), but if cut obliquely (upper microspore), weakly contrasted vesicles are larger (indicating that they are flattened
along the invagination walls – Fig. 7C, asterisks); several
944
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
F I G . 5. High-magnification images of tapetal cytoplasm. (A) Large bundles of hair-like structures (restricted by arrows) which are typically liquid crystals (or
hexagonal mesophase of micelles). (B) Higher magnification (×1.4) reveals the tubular (cylindrical) nature of micelles (thick arrows). Thin arrow points to a
tapetal outgrowth which is in contact with a microspore invaginated area, filled with osmiophilic substance. M, microspore; Ta, tapetum. Scale bars ¼ 1 mm.
smaller vesicles appear on the point of being pinched off
(Fig. 7C, thin arrows). The tangentionally sectioned microspore
surface with heterogeneous droplets inside invaginations is
shown at higher magnification in Fig. 7D (white asterisks).
At the next developmental step, spines and gemmae appear
on the microspore surface (Fig. 8). Tapetal cells invade
between microspores and are in contact with the microspore
surface (Fig. 8A). The developing spines are clearly visible
(Fig. 8A, arrows). Lipoid globules (Fig. 8A, white asterisks)
in the tapetal cytoplasm have a strongly contrasted core and a
light halo. Higher magnification reveals spines, rooted into
cup-like invaginations (Fig. 8B, arrows) and a thin electrondense layer on the microspore surface, covered with spheroid
gemmae (Fig. 8B, black asterisk). Clusters of spheroidal
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
C
D
E
F
945
F I G . 6. Tetrads shortly before disintegration and their close contacts with tapetum. (A) The four members of a planar tetrad (Tet) are still close to each other, and
they are in the vicinity of tapetum (Ta). Small periodic invaginations of the plasma membrane, filled with an osmiophilic substance, are shown by thin arrows.
Note the contact with adjacent tetrad (thick arrow). N, nucleus. (B) Tapetal outgrowths in contact with two microspores of a former tetrad (thick arrows). Periodic
invaginations with dark inclusions are indicated by thin arrows. AL, anther loculus; M, microspore. (C) The surfaces of adjacent microspores (M) are ‘inlayed’
with dark inclusions inside small invaginations (arrows). N, nucleus; P, plastid. (D) Tangential section through a microspore surface. Invaginations of the plasma
membrane in side view are seen between the microspore surface processes, shown by thick arrows. Most invaginations, filled with a dark substance, are seen in
front view and appear circular (thin arrows). (E) The border of a microspore with surface processes (thick arrows) and dark inclusions inside surface invaginations
(thin arrows). (F) The outgrowths of the tapetum are in contact with the microspore processes (thick arrows); invaginations of the microspore surface, filled with
osmiophilic substance, are observed at sites of contact between tapetum and the microspore (thin arrows). Scale bars: (A–C) ¼ 2 mm; (D– F) ¼ 1 mm.
particles are observed between microspores and tapetal cells
(Fig. 8C, asterisks). The initiation of spine formation is shown
in Fig. 8D. The first step is the raising of a ‘bare armature’
(large arrow) of the future spine. This armature (or ‘skeleton’)
is cone-like and built of long, rod-like units, with a diameter
of about 15 nm. This skeleton of a future spine is rooted
within a cluster of spherical globules: darker globules at the
base of the invagination (Fig. 8D, white arrows) and more
light and smaller globules in the centre (Fig. 8D, white asterisk).
These globules appear at the base of the former osmiophilic
946
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
C
B
D
F I G . 7. Young free microspores. (A, B) Details of the microspore surface. Periodic invaginations (which are sites of future spines of exine) have a cup-like form,
and they are filled with osmiophilic substance (arrows), most probably of lipoid nature. M, microspore cytoplasm; Mi, mitochondrion; P, plastid. (C) Two adjacent
microspores at slightly later stage than in A and B, one sectioned tangentionally (left lower corner), the other centrally (right upper corner). Tangentionally sectioned invaginations with osmiophilic substance contain weakly contrasted vesicles, located on the periphery of strongly contrasted substance (thick arrows). In
the upper microspores weakly contrasted vesicles are larger (asterisks), and several smaller vesicles appear to be on the point of pinching off (arrows). These are
interpeted as chimeric polymersomes, a particular kind of micelle, formed of two hydrophobic block co-polymers. They are the base for formation of future
spines. (D) Tangentionally sectioned microspore surface with chimeric polymersomes (white asterisks) in more detail. Scale bars ¼ 1 mm.
F I G . 8. Spines and gemmae development on the microspore surface. (A) Fragments of three microspores (M) and a tapetal cell (Ta) invading between them.
Arrows point to spines. Note lipoid globules (white asterisks) in the tapetal cytoplasm that have a strongly contrasted core and lighter halo. (B) A microspore
fragment showing spines, rooted into cup-like invaginations (arrows), and a thin electron-dense layer on the microspore surface, covered with spheroid gemmae
(black asterisk). (C) Magnified part of A, showing the border between microspore and tapetal cell. Note clusters of spheroid particles (asterisks) between the two
cells and on the surface of the microspore. (D) Border between a tapetal cell (Ta) and a microspore (M). This marks the initiation of a spine formation. The first
step is raising of ‘bare armature’ (large black arrow) of the future spine. This ‘armature’ is cone-like and built of long, rod-like units (most probably liquid-crystal
in structure) comprising cylindrical micelles. Note that this skeleton of a future spine is rooted into a cup-like invagination of the microspore plasma membrane,
filled at this ontogenetic stage with two kinds of spherical globules: darker ones at the base (white arrows) and lighter and smaller ones in the centre (white
asterisk). These globules are spherical micelles and are formed from the two immiscible hydrophobic polymers that were revealed earlier in development as
chimerical polymersomes (see Fig. 6C, D). Gemmae which appear on the microspore surface (small black arrows) are formed also on the base of spherical
micelles. Pl, microspore plasma membrane. (E) Initiation of sporopollenin accumulation around liquid-crystal skeleton is observed as a ‘cloud around the armature’ (large arrow). Several spherical globules adhere to the forming spine (small arrows), the others covering the microspore surface. (F) Sporopollenin accumulation in progress; liquid-crystal ‘armature’ (arrows) protrudes from semi-mature spines (S). (G) Almost mature spine (S) with protruding liquid-crystal ‘skeleton’
on top (arrow). The spine is ‘nested’ into a cluster of large and small globules at its base. Scale bars: (A) ¼ 2 mm; (B, C) ¼ 1 mm; (D– G) ¼ 0.5 mm.
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
C
D
E
G
F
947
948
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
B
C
D
F I G . 9. Maturation of the exine. (A) Mature ectexine, consisting of a thin sporopollenin layer, ornamented with spines (in some of which a liquid-crystal ‘armature’ is still visible through sporopolleninous accumulations – large arrow) and gemmae (small arrows). No endexine. The intine starts to develop in the periplasmic space (PS). (B) Spines (large arrows), some of them cross-sectioned, are uniformly distributed on the microspore surface at the sites of initial
invaginations (see Figs 3 and 6). The microspore surface between spines is covered with a thin, skin-like ectexine (thick arrow) and gemmae (small arrows).
LG, lipid globule. (C, D) Mature spines (S) nested into clusters of globules of different size. Large basal globules (large arrows) have formed, as well as
gemmae between spines, on the base of larger spherical micelles. Smaller globules formed on the base of smaller spherical micelles (small arrows). Scale
bars ¼ 0.5 mm.
droplets with weakly contrasted vesicles within (see Fig. 7C, D).
Simultaneously, gemmae appear on the microspore surface
(Fig. 8D, small black arrows). Later, new rods 15 nm in diameter are added to the initial rods, and these are orientared
more or less perpendicular to the plasma membrane
(Figs 8E–G and 9A). Sporopollenin accumulation around the
spine ‘skeletons’ is first observed as a ‘cloud around the armature’ (Fig. 8E, large arrow). Some spherical globules often
adhere to the forming spines (Fig. 8E, small arrows), while
others cover the microspore surface between spines. As sporopollenin accumulates around the ‘armature’ (arrows), the latter
becomes obscure and protrudes only on the tops of spines
(Fig. 8F, G, arrows).
Mature ectexine consists of a thin, skin-like sporopollenin
layer (Fig. 9B, thick arrow), ornamented with spines
(Fig. 9A, B, large arrows); in some spines (Fig. 9A) the ‘armature’ is still visible through sporopollenin accumulations and
gemmae (Fig. 9A, B, small arrows). Endexine does not
appear. The intine starts to develop in the periplasmic space
(Fig. 9A). Spines (Fig. 9B, large arrows) are uniformly distributed on the microspore surface in sites of initial invaginations
(see Figs 3 and 6). Mature spines are nested within clusters of
globules of different size: large basal globules (Fig. 9C, D,
large arrows) and smaller globules (Fig. 9C, D, small arrows).
The first portion of intine appears as a network with strongly
contrasted substance in its lumina (Fig. 10A, B). Remnants of
the tapetum remain in association with the microspores. After
completion of intine formation (the area shown by arrows in
Fig. 10C, D) its distal part appears laminated, but the proximal
part appears channelled (Fig. 10D).
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
A
949
B
C
D
F I G . 10. The formation of the intine. (A, B) The first portion of intine (Int) appears as a network with strongly contrasted substance in its lumina. Tapetal
remnants (TaR) remain in association with the microspores. (C, D) The completion of intine formation (Int, the area shown by arrows). In D the distal part
of the intine appears laminated, whereas the proximal part is channelled. This non-uniformity of the intine structure in A– D is based most probably on a combination of three transitive micelle mesophases: perforated layers (A, B), perforated layers plus cylindrical micelles (C), and neat (lamellar) micelles plus cylindrical micelles (D). Scale bars ¼ 1 mm.
D IS C US S IO N
A further paradox: the exine that lacks exine
As shown here, the tetrad microspores of Persea americana
lack callose and glycocalyx, the main prerequisites for ‘conventional’ exine development. As a consequence, the exine in
P. americana pollen grains is represented mainly by ornamentation (spines and gemmae between spines), which appears earlier
than the underlying very thin, skin-like layer of ectexine. There
is no trace of endexine. Hence, the exine in Persea has to be
considered as strongly reduced, an opinion that had previously
been advanced (Hesse and Kubitzki, 1983; Hesse and Waha,
1983). The case of Persea is not unique: a remarkable resemblance exists between the exines of Laurales and some monocotyledons, members of Zingiberales (Stone et al., 1979; Kress
and Stone, 1982; Furness and Rudall, 1999), reduced exines
were examined in monocot Hydrocharitaceae and Nayadaceae
(Tanaka et al., 2004), ontogeny of exineless pollen wall was
investigated in the dicot Callitriche truncata with both aerial
and underwater pollination (Osborn et al., 2001), and the
most profound examples of virtually exineless pollen are well
known in hydrophilous sea-grasses (see discussion in Hesse
and Waha, 1983).
The consensus suggests that callose is necessary for normal
pollen exine development (see Gabarayeva et al., 2009a). An
example of calloseless tetrads (which were called tetrad-like),
with subsequent well-developed exines of pollen grains in
Pandanus odoratissimus reported by Periasamy and
Amalathas (1991), but this work was carried out by using
light microscopy only, with addition of a scanning electron
micrograph, showing the surface of pollen grains. This case
deserves more detailed investigation using transmission electron microscopy. However, most spore plants manage very
well without callose around their tetrads and tetraspores (for
a review see Gabarayeva and Hemsley, 2006), and heterosporous leptosporangiate ferns have developed to manage without
950
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
the tetrad period entirely (Lugardon, 1990). We note, however,
that most pollen walls are much more complicated in their
microarchitecture than most spore walls (though with some
exceptions). It was suggested that pattern formation of many
spores proceeds mainly by self-assembly of colloidal units,
and this hypothesis was strongly supported by experimental
simulation of spore walls (Hemsley et al., 2000; Moore
et al., 2009). In this respect (a dominant role of self-assembly
in sporoderm development), exineless pollen grains have much
in common with spores.
The development of ornamentation
The distribution of spines in Persea is linked to regularly
located osmiophilic droplets on the microspore plasma membrane. The sites of accumulation of this osmiophilic substance,
most probably lipid in nature, are predestined as early as in
dyads and tetrads (Fig. 2D, arrows), and even earlier in
MMCs (Fig. 1C, D, arrows). We suggest that a purely physical
phenomenon causes the distribution of these lipoid droplets
alongside the surface of the microspore plasma membrane.
Oil droplets added to the surface of a sphere covered with a
thin layer of water initially float as circular plates within the
aqueous layer, but when they have sufficiently accumulated,
these plates become more or less tightly packed and selforganize into a hexagonal pattern (D’Arcy Thompson, 1959).
This is exactly what was observed in Persea: lipoid droplets,
first randomly distributed in a thin hydrophilic layer of the microspore glycocalyx, when accumulated, self-assemble into a
kind of hexagonal pattern (Fig. 6D). The same hydrophilic –
hydrophobic relationship was suggested by Sheldon and
Dickinson (1983) for Lilium exine patterning. It has been
suggested that ontogenetic studies often reveal pre-patterned
templates forming in the sporocyte (Wellman, 2003).
After determination of the sites of future spines around the
cell surface the plasma membrane becomes more and more
invaginated under lipoid droplets (Figs 4 and 6), and the
latter increase in volume (Fig. 6). Plasma membrane invaginations at the early tetrad stage were considered to be the determining factor for reticulate (Takahashi, 1993, 1995a) and
baculate (Takahashi, 1995b) exine patterns in a number of
species. In Persea microspores the glycocalyx does not
develop into a noticeable structure (some trace of the original
structure is seen in tetrads by cytochemical means; Fig. 3D);
nevertheless the supposition persists that tensional integrity
(tensegrity) principles (Ingber and Jamieson, 1985; Ingber,
1993, 2003a, b) are involved in the appearance of invaginated
sites of the tetrad microspore surface in many species.
Hypotheses for a sequence of tensegrity events, starting with
a pre-stressed cell, have been proposed (Southworth and
Jernstedt, 1995; Gabarayeva et al., 2009a). The ordered distribution of the invaginated sites of the microspore surface is
determined most probably by the ordered spatial distribution
of cytoskeletal microfilaments and their contraction in the
course of pre-stress.
After appearing, the periodic plasma membrane cup-like
invaginations are filled with additional osmiophilic substance.
This is a consequence of the close association between the
tetrads and the tapetum; the latter invades between the
tetrads and promotes their separation (Fig. 8A) – so-called
secretory tapetum type with regrouping cells, one of a
variety of subtypes of the secretory tapetum with subsequent
reorganization (Kamelina, 1983). The importance of an even
more unusual ( periodic) close association between tapetal
cells and microspore tetrads/free microspores in Nymphaea
colorata has been reported and was termed cyclic-invasive
(Rowley et al., 1992). Protrusions of the tapetal cells are correlated with lipid-containing invaginations and connected with
the microspore processes (Figs 4 and 6B, F). These processes,
or strands, connecting the developing microspores and tapetal
cells have been described previously (El-Ghazaly et al., 2000;
Rowley and Morbelli, 2009) as elongations of elementary units
of exine; in ‘micelle language’ they correspond to cylindrical
micelles or filaments. It is clear that the source of the lipoid
substance are tapetal cells, their cytoplasm being packed
with bundles of tubular structures (Fig. 5). Such tubular structures represent a typical hexagonal (so-called ‘middle’) mesophase of micelles – a type of nematic liquid crystals – of some
diphilic substance (surfactant), probably sporopollenin precursors or monomers. In earlier studies (for schemes of the
sequence of micelle mesophases and the types of liquid
crystal, see figs 1 – 3 in Gabarayeva and Hemsley, 2006;
figs 2 – 5 in Hemsley and Gabarayeva, 2007; fig. 1 in
Gabarayeva et al., 2009a) we suggested that the development
of the exine can be explained on the basis of colloidal chemistry, including high-molecular-weight colloids. It has been
suggested that a scaffold of the future exines (glycocalyx) is
a colloidal self-assembling system, originated from glycoprotein surfactants (Gabarayeva, 1993), and that this system
self-develops (assuming that the concentration of surfactants
increases), passing through a sequence of pseudostages (¼
mesophases), termed spherical, cylindrical, middle (layer)
and laminate (bilayer) micelles. It is likely that sporopollenin
precursors interfere with this process, promoting the change
of normal micelles to reverse micelles and the appearance of
liquid crystals; these are mainly nematic crystals in which
rod-like units show no strict positional order, but commonly
a large range of orientations. Sporopollenin precursors were
shown to be released from the tapetum (Heslop-Harrison and
Dickinson, 1969; Piffanelli et al., 1998). Nematic liquid crystals were discovered in tubulous chromoplasts (carotenoidbearing plastids) from hips of Rosa rugosa (Sitte, 1981) and
from fruits of Palisota barteri (Knoth et al., 1986), and also
in the periplasmic space of tapetal cells in Michelia fuscata,
in the sites of formation of sporopolleninous orbicules
(Gabarayeva, 1986).
The change of homogeneous osmiophilic ‘droplets’ inside
cup-like invaginations (Fig. 7A, B) to heterogeneous, vesiclecontaining droplets (Fig. 7C, D), with some vesicles pinching
off the droplets (Fig. 7D, thin arrows), is meaningful for all
subsequent development: weakly contrasted zones are the
basis for clusters of globules, and strongly contrasted zones
are the basis for spines, rooted into them (Fig. 9C, D). Our suggestion is that what we observe as heterogeneous ‘droplets’
within plasma membrane invaginations are so-called chimeric
polymersomes – a type of micelle. They are polymer composites that show ordered zones of at least two phases separated
within one polymersome chimera (Fraaije et al., 2005). As in
any classical chimera, the constituents exist in one unit, but
remain separated. Polymer-based chimerae are intrinsically
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
951
A
(a)
(b)
(c)
B
F I G . 11. Diagrams of chimeric polymersomes (from Fraaije et al., 2005, with permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry). (A,a– c) Two-component polymersome chimera, simulated with a dynamic variant of self-consistent field theory (Mesodyn); snapshots at t ¼ 5000. Fractional composition x ¼ 0.25/0.50/0.75
(left to right, rightmost image is 75 % composition, but in open view). (B) Dynamics of formation of 50 % polymersome chimera (as in A,b). Snapshots at (from
left to right) t ¼ 500, 1000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000 and 4500 (5000 in A,b).
unstable; some polymersomes are very large (.10 mm in
diameter). Recent study of the self-assembly of macroscopic
sacs at the interface between two aqueous solutions, bearing
opposite charges, showed the formation of a diffusion barrier
upon their contact which prevents their chaotic mixing
(Capito et al., 2008). Fraaije et al. (2005), using a computer
simulation, examined two-component polymersome chimerae,
a mixture of two diblock polymers, where the two hydrophobic
blocks become demixed, and the hydrophilic blocks show
different curvature preferences. ‘In this way, unstable
domains or rafts are formed, which then lead to protrusions
and invaginations’ (Fraaije et al., 2005, p. 356; emphasis
added). The authors generated models of structures by quenching a homogeneous vesicular droplet of polymer surfactant in
an aqueous bath. Their results are shown diagrammatically in
Fig. 11, and they clearly demonstrate demixing of the two
block copolymers. Figure 11 shows simulated two-component
polymersome chimerae with different fractional composition
of components, one of the components (black) pinching off
vesicles. Figure 11B illustrates the time evolution of the
domains for one composition ratio (50 %), where a small
domain (black) also pinches off spherical micelles.
Not only is the similarity of Fig. 7C, D with Fig. 11 (from
the paper of Fraaije et al., 2005) striking (note that the images
in Fig. 7 are sections of three-dimensional structures), but the
essence of what is going on at this stage at the microspore
surface is very likely the same. Surfactants are first synthesized
in tapetal cells, where they form huge aggregates of nematic
liquid crystals. They are then secreted through the outgrowths
of tapetal cells and their contacts with microspore surface
invaginations. Indeed, surfactants may represent two different
constituents of the future sporopollenin, namely its aliphatic
(long-chain and medium-chain fatty acids) and aromatic
(hydroxycinnamic acids) monomers (Gubatz et al., 1986;
Herminghaus et al., 1988; Hemsley et al., 1992, 1993, 1996a;
van Bergen et al., 1993, 1995, 2004; Collinson et al., 1994;
Kawase and Takahashi, 1995; Niester-Nyveld et al., 1997;
Meuter-Gerhards et al., 1999; Azevedo Souza et al., 2009;
Dobritsa et al., 2009) and phenylalanin as a precursor (Gubatz
and Wiermann, 1992, 1993). Lipid metabolism and chainelongating systems are also involved in sporopollenin biosynthesis (Wilmesmeier and Wiermann, 1995; Wiermann et al.,
2001). Fraaije et al. (2005) have shown that domains or rafts
are formed if the two hydrophobic blocks of diblock polymers
have different chemical compositions, so that the polymers
undergo phase separation in chimeric polymersomes, and if
their hydrophilic blocks are of dissimilar length. When the
phase separation is too strong, the polymers pinch off and individually form assemblies, such as spherical micelles and protrusions. This is exactly what we observe during ornamentation
development in Persea. Initially homogeneous, then heterogeneous droplets inside invaginations (chimeric polymersomes
of different chemical composition), being unstable, split into
two individual assemblies: spherical micelles (future clusters
of globules at the base of every spine) and spines themselves,
starting with their ‘skeletons’ (Fig. 8D). Figure 8D is special
in illustrating the moment of the switch: the framework (‘armature’) or skeleton of the spine is still ‘bare’ and consists of long,
spiral rods arranged into a cone-like structure. These rods are
liquid crystal formations, with cylindrical units arranged less
regularly than those in smectic crystals. The conical form is
widespread among true crystals; some properties of this form
are preferential for stability. The skeletons of spines and clusters
of spherical micelles at the base of spines are centres of nucleation for autopolymerization of new portions of sporopollenin
monomers (Figs 8E–G and 9). Bundles of liquid crystal rods
stick out of developing spines; the same images were observed
in another representative of Laurales, Cinnamomum, by Rowley
and Vasanthy (1993) and were referred to as substructure rods.
Spine development in Ottelia (figs 2–4 and 6 in Takahashi,
1994) has much in common with that of Persea, and radially
orientated rod-like structures are also seen in Ottelia in association with young spines (see fig. 3 in Takahashi, 1994).
Spherical or ovoid micelles (at the point of switching to a
cylindrical form) within the slit between microspore and
tapetal surfaces (Fig. 8C), when adhering to the microspore
952
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
surface between spines (Fig. 8D), become additional centres of
sporopollenin nucleation and turn into gemmae. An interesting
feature is that gemmae have a toothed surface and appear
cross-striped (Fig. 9C, D): this was also noted by Hesse and
Kubitzki (1983). We interpret this feature as a manifestation
of the hierarchical ornamentation of gemmae: small teeth on
the gemmae surface are secondarily accumulated microglobules, shown, for instance, also for Caesalpinia (Takahashi,
1993); cross-striations are typical for cylindrical micelles (a
synonym of ‘tufts’ by Rowley, 1990), and also for ovoid
micelles (see, for instance, sculptured gemmae in Borago officinalis pollen grains; Rowley et al., 1999). In general, a hierarchical principle is widespread in exine structure (Blackmore
et al., 2007). Interestingly, lamellated sheets which cover
spines in Hibiscus (Takahashi and Kouchi, 1988, fig. 19) represent a typical lamellar phase of bicontinuous doublelabyrinth structure (Ball, 1994; Hemsley and Gabarayeva,
2007, fig. 4B), with layers in parallel – a kind of complex
micelle in which lipid- and water-based substances meet.
Of interest is that another kind of chimeric (or ‘hybrid’)
micelle has been observed in early tetrad microspore development in Nymphaea colorata (figs 21– 28 in Gabarayeva and
Rowley, 1994) and Trevesia burckii ( plate II, 6 in
Gabarayeva et al., 2009a) as dark globules, associated with
tubular rods (the whole structure resembling a tadpole). We
are aware that chimeric micelles are unstable transitive forms
between the main micelle mesophases (the latter are spherical,
cylindrical micelles, layers of hexagonally packed cylinders –
‘middle’ mesophase, and double-layers with a gap between –
‘neat’ micelles). There are many other forms of micelles and
their aggregates (figs 3 – 7 in Hemsley and Gabarayeva,
2007) and their transitive forms (Collinson et al., 1993) in
living and non-living nature, including microsporal periplasmic space and its cytoplasm.
Regarding P. americana sporoderm development (which has
neither glycocalyx nor callose) it should be stressed again that
the presence of the microspore cell coating and of callose is
necessary for development of normal, ‘conventional’ exine
with infratectum (columellate etc.), a tectum and a foot layer
(if present). The microspore cell coating (glycocalyx), because
it plays a scaffolding role, is a template for exine development,
through which sporopollenin receptors are probably speciesspecifically distributed. The callose, because it restricts a
special narrow slit (an arena for the most important processes
of the tetrad period), imposes necessary constraints in the
periplasmic space, and may behave actively with respect to
the adjacent macromolecular glycocalyx layer, promoting a
structure-forming process at the interface (Gabarayeva and
Hemsley, 2006; Blackmore et al., 2007; Gabarayeva et al.,
2009a). Without glycocalyx and callose the best that could be
expected is a structureless skin-like layer of exine plus surface
ornamentation – the very thing we observe in Persea pollen.
Recent data on callose-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis
(Dong et al., 2005; Nishikawa et al., 2005; Suzuki et al.,
2008) confirm that callose is necessary for normal exine development. Reduction or complete loss of the exine was shown in
Callitriche truncata, where only a callose-like layer persists
(Osborn et al., 2001). In the absence of callose, only lamellated
endexine develops in the free microspore period in
Ceratophyllum demersum (Takahashi, 1995c). The absence of
callose in pollen mother cells and tetrads in the monocot
Arum alpinum results in no primexine matrix (glycocalyx)
and no ectexine (Anger and Weber, 2006). However, in Arum,
unlike Persea, a thick endexine forms and is followed only by
the appearance of polysaccharidic spines, which do not resist
acetolysis. Arum also demonstrates that some special character
of callose is crucial for ectexine formation. Another common
feature of microspore pattern formation in Arum alpinum and
Persea is that the tapetum invades between the microspores of
the tetrads and separates them (secretory tapetum with reorganization). However, in Arum outlines of spines are literally determined by invaginations of the amoeboid tapetum (Anger and
Weber, 2006), whereas the secretory tapetum of Persea,
playing an active role in synthesis and delivery of sporopollenin
monomers to the sites of spine locations, does not determine the
form of spines. The latter arise largely by self-assembly, under
initial genetically controlled precise conditions, for example, the
chemical composition and concentrations of substances
involved.
This point is strongly supported by mimics of spore/pollen
surfaces, obtained in experiments with styrene (Hemsley
et al., 1996b, 1998, 2003; Griffiths and Hemsley, 2002;
Moore et al., 2009); these experiments clearly demonstrate
that surface ornament does not need a template. It was
impressive to see that these structures, which so closely
resembled exospore or exine surfaces, were nothing but the
result of adsorption of metallo-organic substances deposited
by a chemical vapour-phase metallization method (see fig. 1
in Hemsley and Gabarayeva, 2007). The impressive results
of Thom et al. (1998) on reassembly of dissolved sporopollenin into spherical and rod-like structures provide additional
evidence for the capacity of sporopollenin for self-assembling
and for its initial colloidal state. It should be noted that the patterns we recognize in palynology are not unique, but can be
generated by physical and chemical processes, some of
which may have little to do with the organisms. We suggest
that sporopollenin accumulates in Persea microspores
without sporopollenin receptors, by autopolymerization of
so-called receptor-independent sporopollenin (Rowley and
Claugher, 1991).
Pollen grains of another member of Araceae – Sauromatum–
completely lack ectexine, but have thick spongy endexine and
spines which are polyssacharidic (Weber et al., 1998). Careful
examination of figs 7–10 in Weber et al. (1998) reveals the
gradual accumulation of spherical particles and fragments of
‘white lines’ in the area of spine formation. We suggest that
these are spherical micelles and lamellate (neat) micelles
(with their bilayers separated by a gap), participating in spine
formation; it is possible that spongy endexine has been
formed on the base of perforated laminae as on one of the transitive forms of micelles. Spines of angiosperm pollen are not
considered to be homologous with each other, either in development or in chemical composition (Pacini and Juniper, 1983;
Takahashi and Kouchi, 1988; Takahashi, 1992, 1994; Weber
et al., 1998). However, it appears that irrespective of the ontogenetic moment of spine initiation, their locations and their
chemical composition, self-assembly of micelles is the basis
for their development. Micelle self-assembly initiates at any
locus where diphilic substances appear in sufficient concentration, and if the concentration increases, the system passes
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
through the sequence of mesophases and their transitive forms.
This is most probably the reason for the well-known phenomenon of similarity of ornamentation on pollen grains and orbicules (Ubisch bodies). In fact, the same surface structures
appear on any suitable surface: pollen surfaces, anther walls
or orbicule surfaces.
Using a freeze-fracture method, Takahashi (1993, 1995a)
showed that initial parts of exine in an early tetrad stage consisted of an association of fibrous threads and granules, and his
conclusion was that these data conflicted with the previous
data on exine development in Lilium of Dickinson (1970),
Nakamura (1979) and Dickinson and Sheldon (1986): these
authors had shown the initial appearance of radially orientated
rods or membranes. We suggest that these two groups of data
do not contradict each other. We interpet granules, gradually
aggregating to fibrous threads (observed by Takahashi), as
spherical micelles, forming strings (a transitive form to filaments): radially orientated rod-like units (observed by
Dickinson, by Nakamura and by Dickinson and Sheldon) are
just the next micelle mesophase – filaments, or cylindrical
micelles, with subsequent sporopollenin accumulations.
Echinate exine ornamentation (as well as other main ornamentation types: reticulate, striate, verrucate) is widespread
among angiosperms. In most cases there is enough genetic
control to distinguish different species on the basis of their
pollen/spores, but shared physical and chemical constraints
and similar components of such self-assembly systems probably account for the widespread phenomenon of convergence
of patterns from remote taxa, for instance the occurrence of
reticulate and polygonal patterns in living and non-living
nature (Scott, 1994), as well as such prominent features as
spines (Hemsley et al., 2000). Self-assembly mechanisms
have an effect in reiterating similar patterns, which is an inevitable consequence of their non-linear nature (for more detail
see Hemsley, 1998; Gabarayeva et al., 2009b). The implications of the non-linear nature of the processes involved in
sporoderm ontogeny are that assessment of phylogeny based
on a comparison of the genetic code would differ partly
from that based on morphology.
Intine formation
The sporopollenin-free part of the Persea sporoderm
(mainly channelled) was described as intine by Hesse and
Kubitzki (1983), but Rowley and Vasanthy (1993) reported
analogous channelled layers in closely related species of
Cinnamomum as a specific onciform zone, considering only
a thin fibrillar basal layer which was introduced following
microspore mitosis as true intine. Here we put aside this question of terminology, because it is far from being decisive in
this paper; our aim was to clarify the underlying cause of
developmental events.
Hesse and Kubitzki (1983) reported the existence of a
bilayered intine in Persea americana: the outer thick channelled layer and slightly laminated basal layer. Figure 10C,
D show that the outer layer is laminated, but the basal layer
is channelled. In our opinion, there is no inconsistency in
these two sets of data. We suggest that everything observed
in the periplasmic space of immature pollen is semi-liquid,
and that intine, just as exine, develops most probably on the
953
base of micelles. Micellar mesophases are very labile and
easily switch from one to another, especially inside the
sporopollenin-free part of the sporoderm. What is observed
as a network in Fig. 10A, B is evidently a transitive micellar
form – a perforated layer; the ‘white lines’ in Fig. 10D are
lamellate (neat) micelles with their gaps between bilayers;
radially orientated channels (Fig. 10C, D) form on a base of
cylindrical micelles. In the narrow periplasmic space, at the
wavy plasma membrane in Fig. 10D (‘basal intine layer’ of
Hesse and Kubitzki; ‘true intine’ of Rowley and Vazanthy),
spherical units are seen – the first micellar mesophase, spherical micelles. This suggests that the intine is not yet completed
and is not at the final stage of its development. Therefore, it
depends on the moment of fixation as to which exact combination of micelle mesophases is captured.
CO NC L US IO NS
There is no callose and no glycocalyx in Persea americana
microspores during the tetrad period. As a result, the exine is
represented mainly by ornamentation (spines and gemmae
between spines), which appear earlier than the underlying
very thin, skin-like layer of ectexine. There is no endexine.
The distribution of the future spines corresponds to regularly
located lipoid droplets and invaginations of the microspore
plasma membrane under these droplets. The distribution of
these lipoid droplets along the surface of the microspore
plasma membrane is a result of purely physical hydrophilic –
hydrophobic interactions. The suggestion is that tensegrity
(another self-assembling process) is involved in the appearance of the invaginations.
Heterogeneous droplets inside invaginations are most probably chimeric polymersomes, a kind of unstable micelle, in
which at least two different components ( presumably sporopollenin precursors) are phase-separated. Subsequent splitting
of these into two individual assemblies leads to the appearance
of both spherical micelles (future clusters of globules at the
base of every spine) and liquid-crystal ‘skeletons’ of future
spines.
After gradual accumulation of sporopollenin within the
liquid-crystal ‘backbone’ of spines and on the surface of
spherical micelles, spines, nested within clusters of globules,
and surface gemmae appear. Accumulation of sporopollenin
proceeds without receptors, by autopolymerization of receptorindependent sporopollenin.
The tapetum plays an important role during microspore
development. It supplies microspores with sporopollenin
monomers and nutritive substances, invades between microspores at the end of the tetrad period and persists in close
contact with them.
The intine is heterogeneous and consists of several layers.
These layers develop on the base of several sequential
micelle mesophases.
Micelle self-assembly is the basic mechanism for development of exine (¼ ornamentation in Persea) and intine. It is
highly probable that the genome of P. americana determines
the synthesis of necessary substances (glycoproteins for glycocalyx, sporopollenin precursors, etc.) at definite concentrations
and ratios, with their subsequent secretion into particular sites.
The remaining processes are self-assembling.
954
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
AC KN OW LED GEMEN T S
This work was supported by RFBR grant No. 08-04-00498.
We thank our engineer Peter Tzinman for assistance with
transmission electron microscopy, and Nikolay Arnautov for
permission to use the material from the Komarov Institute
greenhouses.
L I T E R AT U R E CI T E D
Anger E, Weber M. 2006. Pollen wall formation in Arum alpinum. Annals of
Botany 97: 239–244.
Azevedo Souza C, Kim SS, Koch S, et al. 2009. A novel fatty acyl-CoA
synthetase is required for pollen development and sporopollenin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 21: 507– 525.
Ball P. 1994. Designing the Molecular World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 216–255.
van Bergen PF, Collinson ME, de Leeuw JW. 1993. Chemical composition
and ultrastructure of fossil and extant salvinialean microspore massulae
and megaspores. Grana Supplement 1: 18–30.
van Bergen PF, Collinson ME, Briggs DEG, et al. 1995. Resistant biomacromolecules in the fossil record. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 44: 319–342.
van Bergen PF, Blokker P, Collinson ME, Sinninghe Damsté JS, de Leeuw
JW. 2004. Structural biomacromolecules in plants: what can be leant
from the fossil record? In: Hemsley AR, Poole I. eds. The evolution of
plant physiology. Linnean Society Symposium Series 21. London:
Elsevier Academic Press, 134–154.
Blackmore S, Wortley AH, Skvarla JJ, Rowley JR. 2007. Pollen wall development in flowering plants. New Phytologist 174: 483– 498.
Capito RM, Azevedo HS, Velichko YS, Mata A, Stupp SI. 2008.
Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered
sacs and membranes. Science 319: 1812–1816.
Collinson ME, Hemsley AR, Taylor WA. 1993. Sporopollenin exhibiting colloidal organization in spore walls. Grana Supplement 1: 31–39.
Collinson ME, van Bergen PF, Scott AC, de Leeuw JW. 1994. The oilgenerating potential of plants from coal and coal-bearing strata through
time: a review with new evidence from Carboniferous plants. In: Scott
AC, Fleet AJ. eds. Coal and coal-bearing strata as oil-prone source
rocks? London: The Geological Society Special Publication 77, 31–70.
Courtoy R, Simar LJ. 1974. Importance of controls for the demonstration of
carbohydrates in electron microscopy with silver methenamin or the
thiocarbohydrazide-silver proteinate methods. Journal of Microscopy
100: 199– 211.
D’Arcy Thompson W. 1959. Growth and form, Vol. 2, 2nd edn. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Dickinson HG. 1970. Ultrastructural aspects of primexine formation in the
microspore tetrad of Lilium longiflorum. Cytobiologie 1: 437– 449.
Dickinson HG, Sheldon JM. 1986. The generation of patterning at the plasma
membrane of the young microspore of Lilium. In: Blackmore S, Ferguson
IK. eds. Pollen and spores: form and function. London: Academic Press,
1–17.
Dobritsa AA, Shrestha J, Morant M, et al. 2009. CYP704B1 is a long-chain
fatty acid v-hydroxylase essential for sporopollenin synthesis in pollen of
Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 151: 574–589.
Dong XY, Hong ZL, Sivaramakrichnan M, Mahfouz M, Verma MPS.
2005. Callose synthase (CalS5) is required for exine formation during
microgametogenesis and for pollen viability in Arabidopsis. Plant
Journal 42: 315– 328.
El-Ghazaly G, Moate R, Huysmans S, Skvarla J, Rowley JR. 2000.
Selected stages in pollen wall development in Echinodorus, Magnolia,
Betula, Rondeletia, Borago and Matricaria. In: Harley MM, Morton
CM, Blackmore S. eds. Pollen and spores: morphology and biology
Whitstable, UK: Whitstable Printers Ltd, 17– 29.
Fraaije JGEM, van Sluis CA, Kros A, Zvelindovsky AV, Sevink GJA.
2005. Design of chimaeric polymersomes. Faraday Discussions 128:
355–361.
Furness CA, Rudall PJ. 1999. Inaperturate pollen in monocotyledons.
International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 395 –414.
Gabarayeva NI. 1986. The development of exine in Michelia fuscata
(Magnoliaceae) in connection with changes of cytoplasmic organelles
and tapetum. Botanicheski Zhurnal 71: 311– 322.
Gabarayeva NI. 1993. Hypothetical ways of exine pattern determination.
Grana 33 (supplement 2): 54– 59.
Gabarayeva NI. 2000. Principles and recurrent themes in sporoderm development. In: Harley MM, Morton CM, Blackmore S. eds. Pollen and spores:
morphology and biology. Whitstable, UK: Whitstable Printers Ltd, 1 –17.
Gabarayeva NI, Hemsley AR. 2006. Merging concepts: the role of selfassembly in the development of pollen wall structure. Review of
Palaeobotany and Palynology 138: 121– 139.
Gabarayeva NI, Rowley JR. 1994. Exine development in Nymphaea colorata
(Nymphaeaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 14: 671– 691.
Gabarayeva NI, Grigorjeva VV, Rowley JR, Hemsley AR. 2009a.
Sporoderm development in Trevesia burckii (Araliaceae). I. Tetrad
period: further evidence for participation of self-assembly processes.
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 156: 211– 232.
Gabarayeva NI, Grigorjeva VV, Rowley JR, Hemsley AR. 2009b.
Sporoderm development in Trevesia burckii (Araliaceae). II. Post-tetrad
period: further evidence for participation of self-assembly processes.
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 156: 233– 247.
Griffiths PC, Hemsley AR. 2002. Raspberries and muffins – mimicking biological pattern formation. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 25:
163– 170.
Gubatz S, Wiermann R. 1992. Studies on sporopollenin biosynthesis in
Tulipa anthers. 3. Incorporation of specifically labeled C-14
Phenylalanine in comparison to other precursors. Botanica Acta 105:
407– 413.
Gubatz S, Wiermann R. 1993. Studies on sporopollenin biosynthesis in
Cucurbita maxima. 1. The substantial labeling of sporopollenin from
Cucurbita maxima after application of [C-14] Phenylalanine. Journal of
Biosciences 48: 10–15.
Gubatz S, Herminghaus S, Meurer B, Strack D, Wiermann R. 1986. The
location of hydroxycinnamic acid amides in the exine of Corylus
pollen. Pollen and Spores 28: 347–354.
Hemsley AR. 1998. Nonlinear variation in simulated complex pattern development. Journal of Theoretical Biology 192: 73–79.
Hemsley AR, Gabarayeva NI. 2007. Exine development: the importance of
looking through a colloid chemistry ‘window’. Plant Systematics and
Evolution 263: 25– 49.
Hemsley AR, Chaloner WG, Scott AC, Groombridge CJ. 1992. Carbon-13
solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of sporopollenins from modern
and fossil plants. Annals of Botany 69: 545 –549.
Hemsley AR, Barrie PJ, Chaloner WG, Scott AC. 1993. The composition of
sporopollenin and its use in living and fossil plant systematics. Grana
Supplement 1: 2 –11.
Hemsley AR, Scott AC, Barrie PJ, Chaloner WG. 1996a. Studies of fossil
and modern spore wall biomacromolecules using 13C solid state NMR.
Annals of Botany 78: 83– 94.
Hemsley AR, Jenkins PD, Collinson ME, Vincent B. 1996b. Experimental
modelling of exine self-assembly. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 121: 177–187.
Hemsley AR, Vincent B, Collinson ME, Griffiths PC. 1998. Simulated selfassembly of spore exines. Annals of Botany 82: 105– 109.
Hemsley AR, Collinson ME, Vicent B, Griffiths PC, Jenkins PD. 2000.
Self-assembly of colloidal units in exine development. In: Harley MM,
Morton CM, Blackmore S. eds. Pollen and spores: morphology and
biology. Whitstable, UK: Whitstable Printers Ltd, 31–44.
Hemsley AR, Griffiths PC, Mathias R, Moore SEM. 2003. A model for the
role of surfactants in the assembly of exine sculpture. Grana 42: 38–42.
Herminghaus S, Gubatz S, Arendt S, Wiermann R. 1988. The occurrence of
phenols as degradation products of natural sporopollenin – a comparison
with ‘synthetic sporopollenin’. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 43c:
491– 500.
Heslop-Harrison J, Dickinson HG. 1969. Time relationships of sporopollenin synthesis associated with tapetum and microspores in Lilium.
Planta 84: 199– 214.
Hesse M, Kubitzki K. 1983. The sporoderm ultrastructure in Persea,
Nectandra, Hernandia, Gomortega and some other Lauralean genera.
Plant Systematics and Evolution 141: 299–311.
Hesse M, Waha M. 1983. The fine structure of the pollen wall in Strelitzia
reginae (Musaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 141: 285–298.
Ingber D. 1993. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design
that govern the cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science 104: 613–627.
Ingber DE. 2003a. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems
biology. Journal of Cell Science 116: 1157–1173.
Gabarayeva et al. — Micelles in sporoderm ontogeny in Persea americana
Ingber DE. 2003b. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular
information processing networks. Journal of Cell Science 116:
1397–1408.
Ingber DE, Jamieson JD. 1985. Cells as tensegrity structures: architectural
regulation of histodifferentiation by physical forces transduced over basement membrane. In: Andersson LC, Gahmberg CG, Ekblom P. eds. Gene
expression during normal and malignant differentiation. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press, 13– 32.
Kamelina OP. 1983. Basic results on the comparative embryological investigation of Dipsacaceae and Moriniaceae. In: Erdelska O. ed. Fertilization
and embryogenesis in ovulated plants. Bratislava: Veda, 343–346.
Kawase M, Takahashi M. 1995. Chemical composition of sporopollenin
in Magnolia grandiflora (Magnoliaceae) and Hibiscus syriacus
(Malvaceae). Grana 34: 242 –245.
Knoth R, Hansmann P, Sitte P. 1986. Chromoplasts of Palisota bacteri, and
the molecular structure of chromoplast tubules. Planta 168: 167– 174.
Kress WJ, Stone DE. 1982. Nature of the sporoderm in monocotyledons, with
special reference to the pollen grains of Canna and Heliconia. Grana 21:
129– 148.
Lugardon B. 1990. Pteridophyte sporogenesis: a survey of spore wall ontogeny and fine structure in a polyphyletic plant group. In: Blackmore S,
Knox RB. eds. Microspores: evolution and ontogeny. London:
Academic Press, 95– 120.
Meuter-Gerhards A, Riegert S, Wiermann R. 1999. Studies on sporopollenin biosynthesis in Cucurbita maxima (Duch.). II. The involvement of aliphatic metabolism. Journal of Plant Physiology 154: 431–436.
Moore SEM, Gabarayeva N, Hemsley AR. 2009. Morphological, developmental and ultrastructural comparison of Osmunda regalis L. spores
with spore mimics. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 156:
177– 184.
Nakamura S. 1979. Development of the pollen grain wall in Lilium
longiflorum. Journal of Electron Microscopy 28: 275– 284.
Niester-Nyveld C, Haubrich A, Kampendonk H, et al. 1997.
Immunocytochemical localization of phenolic compounds in pollen
walls using antibodies against p-coumaric acid coupled to bovine serum
albumin. Protoplasma 197: 148–159.
Nishikawa S, Zinkl GM, Swanson RJ, Maruyama D, Preuss D. 2005.
Callose (b- 1, 3 glucan) is essential for Arabidopsis pollen wall patterning, but not tube growth. BMC Plant Biology 5: 22– 30.
Osborn JM, El-Ghazaly G, Cooper RL. 2001. Development of the exineless
pollen wall in Callitriche truncata (Callitrichaceae) and the evolution of
underwater pollination. Plant Systematics and Evolution 228: 81–87.
Pacini E, Juniper BE. 1983. The ultrastructure of the formation and development of the amoeboid tapetum in Arum italicum Miller. Protoplasma 117:
116– 129.
Periasamy K, Amalathas J. 1991. Absence of callose and tetrad in the microsporogenesis of Pandanus odoratissimus with well-formed pollen exine.
Annals of Botany 67: 29– 33.
Piffanelli P, Ross JHE, Murphy DJ. 1998. Biogenesis and function of the
lipidic structures of pollen grains. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 65–80.
Roland J-C, Lembi CA, Morré DJ. 1972. Phosphotungstic acid – cromic
acid as a selective electron-dense stain for plasma-membranes of plant
cells. Stain Technology 47: 195– 200.
Rowley JR. 1990. The fundamental structure of the pollen exine. Plant
Systematics and Evolution Supplement 5: 13–29.
Rowley JR, Claugher D. 1991. Receptor-independent sporopollenin.
Botanica Acta 104: 316– 323.
Rowley JR, Morbelli MA. 2009. Connective structures between tapetal cells
and spores in Lycophyta and pollen grains in angiosperms – a review.
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 156: 157– 164.
Rowley JR, Vasanthy G. 1993. Exine development, structure, and resistance
in pollen of Cinnamomum (Lauraceae). Grana Suppement 2: 49– 53.
Rowley JR, Gabarayeva NI, Walles B. 1992. Cyclic invasion of tapetal cells
into loculi during microspore development in Nymphaea colorata
(Nymphaeaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 801–808.
955
Rowley JR, Skvarla JJ, Gabarayeva NI. 1999. Exine development in Borago
(Boraginaceae). 2. Free microspore stages. Taiwania 44: 212– 229.
Scott RJ. 1994. Pollen exine – the sporopollenin enigma and the physics of
pattern. In: Scott RJ, Stead MA. eds. Society for Experimental Biology
Seminar Series 55: Molecular and cellular aspects of plant reproduction.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–81.
Sheldon JM, Dickinson HG. 1983. Determination of patterning in the pollen
wall of Lilium henryi. Journal of Cell Science 63: 191–208.
Sitte P. 1981. Role of lipid self-assembly in subcellular morphogenesis. In:
Kiermayer O. ed. Cytomorphogenesis in plants. Cell Biology
Monographs, vol. 8. Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 401– 421.
Smith MM, McCully ME. 1978. A critical evaluation of the specificity of
aniline blue induced fluorescence. Protoplasma 95: 229–254.
Southworth D, Jernstedt JA. 1995. Pollen exine development precedes
microtubule rearrangement in Vigna unguiculata (Fabaceae): a model
for pollen wall patterning. Protoplasma 187: 79–87.
Stone DE, Sellers SC, Kress WJ. 1979. Ontogeny of exineless pollen in
Heliconia, a banana relative. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
66: 701– 730.
Suzuki T, Masaoka K, Nishi M, Nakamura K, Ishiguro S. 2008.
Identification of kaonashi mutants showing abnormal pollen exine structure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology 49: 1465–1477.
Takahashi M. 1992. Development of spinous exine in Nuphar japonicum De
Candolle (Nymphaeaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 75:
317–322.
Takahashi M. 1993. Exine initiation and substructure in pollen of Caesalpinia
japonica (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). American Journal of Botany
80: 192– 197.
Takahashi M. 1994. Pollen development in a submerged plant, Ottelia
alismoides (L.) Pers. (Hydrocharitaceae). Journal of Plant Research
107: 161 –164.
Takahashi M. 1995a. Three-dimensional aspects of exine initiation and development in Lilium longiflorum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany
82: 847– 854.
Takahashi M. 1995b. Exine development in Aucuba japonica Thunberg
(Cornaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 85: 199– 205.
Takahashi M. 1995c. Development of structure-less pollen wall in
Ceratophyllum demersum L. (Ceratophyllaceae). Journal of Plant
Research 108: 205– 208.
Takahashi M, Kouchi J. 1988. Ontogenetic development of spinous exine in
Hibiscus syriacus (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 75:
1549– 1558.
Tanaka N, Uehara K, Murata J. 2004. Correlation between pollen morphology and pollination mechanisms in the Hydrocharitaceae. Journal
of Plant Research 117: 265 –276.
Thiéry J-P. 1967. Mise en évidence des polysaccharides sur coupes fines en
microscopie électronic. Journal de Microscopie 6: 987– 1019.
Thom I, Grote M, Abraham-Peskir J, Wiermann R. 1998. Electron and
X-ray microscopic analyses of reaggregated materials obtained after fractionation of dissolved sporopollenin. Protoplasma 204: 13– 21.
Weber M, Halbritter H, Hesse M. 1998. The spiny pollen wall in
Sauromatum (Araceae) – with special reference to the endexine.
International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 744–749.
Wellman CH. 2003. Origin, function and development of the spore wall in
early land plants. In: Hemsley AR, Poole I. eds. The evolution of plant
physiology. Linnean Society Symposium Series 21. Kew: Royal
Botanic Gardens Kew, 43–63.
Wiermann R, Ahlers F, Schmitz-Thom I. 2001. Sporopollenin. In:
Hofrichter M, Steinbüchel A. eds. Biopolymers – lignin, humic substances and coal, Vol. 1. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 209–227.
Wilmesmeier S, Wiermann R, 1995. Influence of EPTC (S-ethyldipropyl-thiocarbamate) on the composition of surface waxes and sporopollenin structure in Zea mays. Journal of Plant Physiology 146: 22– 28.