Estimation of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the
Baltic Sea in the periods 1997-2003 and 2000-2006
Summary Report for HELCOM
Jerzy Bartnicki and Semeena Valiyaveetil
Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W) of EMEP
OSLO
December 2008
Content
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3
1. New version (2008) of the EMEP unified model.................................................................. 5
2. Nitrogen emissions in the period 1997-2006 ........................................................................ 7
3. Annual depositions of nitrogen in the period 1997-2006.................................................... 11
4. Contributions of country and shipping emissions to the deposition .................................... 14
4.1 Contributions to the Baltic Sea................................................................................... 15
4.2 Contributions to the Bothnian Bay sub-basin ............................................................ 19
4.3 Contributions to the Bothnian Sea sub-basin ............................................................. 23
4.4 Contributions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin.......................................................... 27
4.5 Contributions to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin .............................................................. 31
4.6 Contributions to the Baltic Proper sub-basin ............................................................. 35
4.7 Contributions to the Danish Straits sub-basin ............................................................ 39
4.8 Contributions to the Kattegat sub-basin ..................................................................... 43
5. Contributions of emission sectors to nitrogen deposition ................................................... 47
5.1 Contributions to the Baltic Sea basin ......................................................................... 48
5.2 Contributions to the Botnian Bay sub-basin .............................................................. 49
5.3 Contributions to the Botnian Sea sub-basin ............................................................... 50
5.4 Contributions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin.......................................................... 51
5.5 Contributions the to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin ........................................................ 52
5.6 Contributions to the Baltic Proper sub-basin ............................................................. 53
5.7 Contributions to the Danish Straits sub-basin ............................................................ 54
5.8 Contributions to the Kattegat sub-basin ..................................................................... 55
Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 57
References ................................................................................................................................ 59
Appendix A: List of files with the EMEP products ................................................................. 62
2
Introduction
In this report we describe the results of the project in which MSC/W of EMEP has performed
a very large number of runs with the EMEP unified model for the HELCOM needs. The main
goal of the project was estimation of nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea and its sub-basins
in the periods 1997-2003 and 2000-2006, as well as identification of the main emission
sources contributing to this deposition. The emission sources of special interest for the project
were: all HELCOM Contracting parties and international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea. The
results of the project are necessary for further work on implementation of the eutrophication
segment of the Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP).
The specific tasks for EMEP in the frame of the project are listed below:
1. Calculation of total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea for each individual year of
the period 1997-2003 and average for the entire period.
2. Calculation of total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea sub-basins, as defined in
BSAP, for each individual year of the period 1997-2003 and average for the entire
period.
3. Estimation of the quantities of deposition originating from each of the HELCOM
countries, other countries as a total sum and from shipping. Deposition to the Baltic
Sea and each of its (BSAP) sub-basins, averaged over the entire period 1997-2003.
4. Calculation of blame matrices for oxidized and reduced nitrogen for one selected year
of the period 1997-2003. Contribution of emissions from each of selected sector of
each country to nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea and its BSAP sub-basins.
5. Calculation of total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea for each individual year of
the period 2000-2006 and average for the entire period.
6. Calculation of total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea sub-basins, as defined in
BSAP, for each individual year of the period 2000-2006 and average for the entire
period.
7. Estimation of the quantities of deposition originating from each of the HELCOM
countries, other countries as a total sum and from shipping to the Baltic Sea and each
of its (BSAP) sub-basins averaged for the entire period 2000-2006.
8. Calculation of blame matrices for oxidized and reduced nitrogen for one selected year
of the period 2000-2006. Contribution of emissions from each of selected sector of
each country to nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea and its BSAP sub-basins.
9. Documentation of the work done. Electronic transfer of data.
More than 500 model runs were necessary in order to complete the above tasks. The model
results were then subject of post-processing with the aim of calculating depositions to the
entire basin of the Baltic Sea and its seven BSAP sub-basins:
1. Bothnian Bay
2. Bothnian Sea
3. Gulf of Finland
4. Gulf of Riga
5. Baltic Proper
6. Danish Straits
7. Kattegat
The locations of BSAP sub-basins are shown in Fig. 1.
3
Figure 1. The locations of the BSAP sub-basins of the Baltic Sea for which all depositions
were calculated.
The deliverables from EMEP in the form of files in different formats are available in the
EMEP web site: ftp://ftp.met.no/pub/emep/ in directory HELCOM and can be downloaded
from there. Password is necessary in order to get access to the files. It was made available to
HELCOM Secretariat. The complete list of deliverables from EMEP/files, which can be
found on the EMEP web site is included in Appendix A.
4
1. New version (2008) of the EMEP unified model
The Unified EMEP model is an Eulerian model that has been developed at EMEP/MSC-W
(Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - West of EMEP) for simulating atmospheric transport
and deposition of acidifying and eutrophying compounds as well as photo-oxidants in Europe.
The model has been documented in EMEP Status Report 2003, Part I [12] and updates of the
model have been described in EMEP Status Reports 2004 [13], 2005 [14], 2006 [15] and
2007 [16]. Here we only give a short description of the basic features of the model. Model
details and its applications can also be found on the EMEP web site [9].
The model domain covers Europe and the Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 2). The model grid (of the size
170×133) has a horizontal resolution of 50 km at 60o N, which is consistent with the
resolution of emission data reported to CLRTAP. In the vertical, the model has 20 sigma
layers reaching up to 100 hPa. Approximately 10 of these layers are placed below 2 km to
obtain high resolution of the boundary layer which is of special importance to the long range
transport of air pollution.
Figure. 2.Computational domain of the Unified EMEP model. The official EMEP area is
included within the internal frame and the results of routine model applications are also
provided in this area.
The Unified EMEP model uses 3-hourly resolution meteorological data from the PARLAMPS model, a dedicated version of the HIRLAM (High Resolution Limited Area Model)
Numerical Weather Prediction model [17].
The emissions consist of gridded national annual emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen
oxides, ammonia, non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOC) and carbon monoxide.
They are available in each of the 50 × 50 km2 model grid. These emissions are distributed
temporally according to monthly and daily factors derived from data provided by the
University of Stuttgart (IER).
5
Concentrations of 71 species are computed in the latest version of the Unified EMEP model
(56 are advected, 15 are short-lived and not advected). The sulphur and nitrogen chemistry is
coupled to the photo-chemistry, which allows a more sophisticated description of e.g. the
oxidation of sulphur dioxide to sulphate.
Dry deposition is calculated using the resistance analogy and is a function of the pollutant
type, meteorological conditions and surface properties. Parameterization of wet deposition
processes includes both in-cloud and sub-cloud scavenging of gases and particles using
scavenging coefficients.
The EMEP model has been thoroughly validated. Fagerli et al. [18] presented an extensive
evaluation of the acidifying and eutrophying components for the years 1980, 1985, 1990 and
1995 to 2000. In Fagerli et al. [19], a comparison of observations and modelled results for
2001 was conducted, and in Fagerli [20] results for 2002 with an updated EMEP Unified
model, version 2.0, was presented. This version differed slightly from the 2003 version, as
described in Fagerli [20], however the main conclusions on the model performance were the
same. In 2004, 2005 and 2006 the model results were presented for the years 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively Fagerli [21], Fagerli et al. [22], Fagerli and Hjellbrekke [23]. It has been
shown that the EMEP model performance is rather homogeneous over the years (Fagerli et al.
[18]), but depends on geographical coverage and quality of the measurement data. The EMEP
model has also been validated for nitrogen compounds in Simpson et al. [24] and for dry and
wet deposition of sulphur, and wet depositions for nitrogen in Simpson et al. [25], with
measurements outside the EMEP network. Calculated trends of total nitrate (HNO3 and NO 3− )
and ammonia + ammonium in air and precipitation have been evaluated in Fagerli and Aas
[26] and show in general good correspondence with the observations.
In the latest model version 3.0.7, implemented in 2008, an important modification has been
made. Since last year, the routine for calculation of night time production of HNO3 has been
updated when an error in the routine was found. The result was a decrease in the reaction rate
of about a factor of 4.
The species most affected by the upgrade were nitrogen dioxide, nitric acid and nitrate and
ammonium aerosols. For NO2 concentrations increase by 10-20% for most of Europe, except
in the Nordic countries where the concentrations increased by as much as 20-40%. Nitric acid
changed less, within 10% for most of Europe, but up to 20% in some areas. The largest
differences were found for nitrate aerosol, where changes up to around 40% appear for
countries with high NOx and NH3 emissions. Coarse nitrate change less (around 10%) than
fine nitrate (up to 50%). The reason why the largest changes appear in these countries is that
ammonia emissions are rather large in this area and the formation of ammonium nitrate is
limited by the availability of HNO3 (lower formation rate of HNO3 in the new code). As a
consequence, ammonium aerosols decrease by 10-30% in central Europe, with the largest
effects in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Denmark and parts of the UK.
The latest modifications in the model have also an impact on the latest result for the Baltic
Sea and its sub-basins presented in this report. Compared to the old model version, annual
depositions of oxidised nitrogen calculated with the new model version for the period 1997 –
2006 are 10-15% lower. On the other hand, annual depositions of reduced nitrogen calculated
with the new model version are 1-3% higher than those calculated with the old version.
6
2. Nitrogen emissions in the period 1997-2006
All model calculations described in the present report have been performed with the latest
version of the EMEP Unified model described in the previous Chapter and with the latest
available emissions [30]. The time series with annual total nitrogen oxides and ammonia
emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties in the period 1997-2006 used by the EMEP
model are shown in Figure 1. The nitrogen emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
contribute significantly (60% and more) to nitrogen deposition in the Baltic Sea and its subbasins.
Emissions from Denmark
Emissions from Estonia
NH3-N
Emission (kt N per year)
Emission (kt N per year)
200
Total-N
150
100
50
0
Total-N
25
20
15
10
5
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Year
Emissions from Finland
Emissions from Germany
120
NH3-N
100
Total-N
NO2-N
Emission (kt N per year)
Emission (kt N per year)
NO2-N
80
60
40
20
0
1400
NH3-N
1200
Total-N
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Year
Emissions from Latvia
Emissions from Lithuania
NH3-N
25
Total-N
Emission (kt N per year)
Emission (kt N per year)
30
NO2-N
NH3-N
NO2-N
20
15
10
5
0
Total-N
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Year
Emissions from Poland
Emissions from Russia
NO2-N
700
Emission (kt N per year)
NH3-N
Emission (kt N per year)
NO2-N
NH3-N
NO2-N
Total-N
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
NO2-N
NH3-N
Total-N
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Year
Emissions from Sweden
Emissions from the Baltic Sea
NH3-N
Emission (kt N per year)
Emission (kt N per year)
NO2-N
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Total-N
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
120
100
80
NO2-N
60
40
20
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Year
Figure 3. Annual emissions of nitrogen dioxide and ammonia from the HELCOM Contracting
7
Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea in the period 1997-2006. Units: kt N per year.
In seven out of nine HELCOM Contracting Parties annual ammonia emissions are lower in
2006 than in 1997, despite some oscillations in this period. A small increase of ammonia
emissions can be noticed in Finland and Latvia. In eight out of nine HELCOM Contracting
parties, annual nitrogen oxides emissions are also lower in 2006 than in 1997. The only
exception is Russia, where nitrogen oxides emissions are approximately 200 kt higher in 2006
than in 1997. Nitrogen oxides emissions from the ship traffic on the Baltic Sea are more than
20% higher in 2006 than in 1995.
Time series with annual emissions of nitrogen dioxides and ammonia from HELCOM, as the
sum of emissions from all nine HELCOM Contracting Parties, in the period 1997-2006 are
shown in Fig. 4. Both nitrogen oxides and ammonia emissions are lower in 2006 than in 1997,
but not so much for the nitrogen oxides. This can be explained by the increasing emissions of
nitrogen oxides in Russia in the considered period.
Emissions from HELCOM
NO2-N
Emission (kt N per year)
NH3-N
Total-N
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Figure 4. Annual emissions of nitrogen dioxide and ammonia from HELCOM, as the sum of
emissions from all nine HELCOM Contracting Parties, in the period 1997-2006. Units: kt N
per year.
Emissions from the international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea have also significant
contribution to nitrogen deposition and are taken into account in the model runs. There are
large uncertainties in the estimate for ship traffic emissions. The international ship emissions
and their spatial distribution have been updated based on new emission estimates derived by
ENTEC for the year 2000. Ship emissions for 2006, were deduced by applying an increase
factor of 2.5 % per year on cargo vessel traffic and 3.9 % per year on passenger vessel traffic.
The factors are the same as used by ENTEC (UK – Environmental and Engineering
Consultancy) for predicting emissions of nitrogen in 2010 based on the emission estimates for
2000. The spatial distribution of annual nitrogen oxides emissions from the international ship
traffic on the Baltic Sea in the year 2006 is shown in Fig. 5.
The spatial distribution of nitrogen emissions from HELCOM Contracting Parties and from
the ship traffic does not change much from one year to another. Maps with the spatial
distributions of annual 2006 emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia in the Baltic Sea
region are shown in Fig. 6 and 7, respectively. Emissions from the international ship traffic
are visible in the Baltic Sea basin (Fig. 6), whereas there are no ammonia emissions over the
Baltic Sea (Fig. 7).
8
Figure 5 Map of annual emissions of nitrogen
oxides from the international ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea in 2006 used in the EMEP model
calculations. Units: Mg of NO2 per year and per
50×50 km grid cell.
Figure 6. Map of annual emission of oxidized
nitrogen (including emissions from the ship traffic)
in the Baltic Sea region in 2006. Units: Mg (tones)
of NO2 per year and per 50×50 km grid cell.
Figure 7. Map of annual emission of ammonia in
the Baltic Sea region in 2006. Units: Mg of NH3
per year and per 50×50 km grid cell.
9
The nitrogen emissions used in the EMEP model calculations are coming from 11 SNAP
sectors. The list of 11 SNAP sectors is given in Table 1.
Table 1. The list of 11 SNAP emissions sectors as specified in the EMEP-CORINAIR Emission
Inventory Guidebook.
Sector 1
Sector 2
Sector 3
Sector 4
Sector 5
Sector 6
Sector 7
Sector 8
Sector 9
Sector 10
Sector 11
Combustion in energy and transformation industry
Non-industrial combustion plants
Combustion in manufacturing industry
Production processes
Extraction and distribution of fossil fuels and geothermal energy
Solvent and other product use
Road transport
Other mobile sources and machinery (including ship traffic)
Waste treatment and disposal
Agriculture
Other sources and sinks
Most of the nitrogen oxides emissions are coming from the combustion sectors 1, 2 and 3 and
from the transportation sectors 7 and 8. Dominating source of ammonia emissions is sector 10
– agriculture which usually contributes more 90% to the total emissions of ammonia. As an
example, contributions of different sectors to annual 2006 emissions of nitrogen oxides and
ammonia in Poland are shown in Fig. 8.
POLAND
POLAND
S8
15 %
S9
0%
S4
S3 1 %
0%
S10
0%
S5
0%
S6
0%
S7
0%
S8
0%
S2
0%
S1
34 %
S9
1%
S1
0%
S7
26 %
S6
0%
S5
0%
S2
9%
S4
2%
S10
98 %
S3
14 %
Figure 8. Relative contribution of different SNAP sectors to annual 2006 nitrogen oxides
(left) and ammonia (right) emissions in Poland.
10
3. Annual depositions of nitrogen in the period 1997-2006.
Using the latest available emissions described in the previous Chapter, the EMEP Unified
model has been used to calculate the annual depositions of oxidised, reduced and total
nitrogen into the Baltic Sea and its sub-basins in the period 1997-2006. The results for the
depositions to the entire Baltic Sea are shown in Figure 1, for oxidised, reduced and total
nitrogen.
Oxidised
Deposition (kt N per year)
300
Reduced
250
Total
200
150
100
50
0
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
Figure 9. Calculated annual depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to the Baltic
Sea in the period 1997-2006. Units: kt N per year.
For all years, deposition of oxidised nitrogen is slightly higher than the deposition of reduced
nitrogen and there are no apparent trends in the depositions. Compared to time series of
nitrogen emissions in the Baltic region (Fig. 3 and 4) there is more inter-annual variability in
the computed deposition, which is mainly caused by the variability in meteorological
conditions for different years . Fig. 9 indicates that the depositions in the period 1997-2003
are slightly higher than the depositions in the period 2000-2006. This is confirmed in Figure
10 where the average depositions are compared for those two periods.
Average depostions
Deposition (kt N per year)
250
212
1997-2003
200
202
2000-2006
150
111
105
101
97
100
50
0
Oxidised
Reduced
11
Total
Figure 10. Comparison of calculated annual average depositions of oxidised, reduced and
total nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2003. Units: kt N per year.
The annual average depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in the
period 2000-2006 are lower than in the period 1997-2003 by 6%, 4% and 5%, respectively.
Time series with annual depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to BSAP subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 1997-2006 are shown in Fig. 11.
Bothnian Bay
Bothnian Sea
12
Reduced
10
Total
Oxidised
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
Oxidised
8
6
4
2
0
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
35
Reduced
30
Total
25
20
15
10
5
0
2006
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Year
2002
2003
2004
Gulf of Finland
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
Oxidised
Reduced
Total
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
12
Reduced
10
Total
8
6
4
2
0
1997
2006
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Baltic Proper
Oxidised
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Reduced
Total
1999
2000
2001
2006
Danish Straits
Oxidised
1998
2005
Year
Year
1997
2006
Gulf of Riga
Oxidised
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1997
2005
Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
30
Reduced
25
Total
20
15
10
5
0
1997
2006
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
Year
Kattegat
Figure 11. Calculated annual depositions of
oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to the
BSAP sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in the
period 1997-2006. Units: kt N per year.
Deposition (kt N per year)
Oxidised
25
Reduced
20
Total
15
10
5
0
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
For all sub-basins deposition of oxidised nitrogen is higher than the deposition of reduced
nitrogen. For five out of seven sub-basins, the maximum of the deposition can be observed in
the year 2000. Only in Baltic Proper and Danish Straits sub-basins maxima occur in the year
1998, but the depositions in 200 are also very high for these two sub-basins. As in the case of
the entire Baltis Sea basin and for the same reason, there is a significant inter-annual
variability in the computed depositions, especially in the first half of the considered period.
Comparison of annual average oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen depositions to BSAP
subbasins of the Baltic Sea, for two periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 is presented in Fig.
12. For all sub-basins and all types of the deposition, it is lower in the period 2000-2006. The
percentage of deposition reduction is given in Table 2. The largest reduction: -6.5%, -6.6%
and -6.5% for oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen deposition, respectively, can be noticed for
the Bothnian Sea sub-basin. A small reduction only, : -1.4%, -1.0% and -1.5% for oxidised,
12
reduced and total nitrogen deposition, respectively, can be seen for the Gulf of Finland subbasin.
Average depostions - Bothnian Sea
8,26
30
7,91
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
Average depostions - Bothnian Bay
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1997-2003
2000-2006
4,53
4,34
3,73
Oxidised
3,57
Reduced
14,39 13,46
10,18
10
0
Oxidised
Total
8
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
1997-2003
2000-2006
10
7,21
7,11
6
4,75
4,70
4
2
0
Oxidised
Reduced
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Total
9,01
2000-2006
5,13
100
2000-2006
80
64,0
60,2
55,7
60
4,99
3,89
Oxidised
3,85
Reduced
Total
23,78
25
Deposition (kt N per year)
Deposition (kt N per year)
1997-2003
8,84
Average depostions - Danish Straits
119,7
120
Total
1997-2003
Average depostions - Baltic Proper
140
Reduced
Average depostions - Gulf of Riga
11,96 11,81
12
9,52
5
Average depostions - Gulf of Finland
14
22,97
2000-2006
20
15
24,57
1997-2003
25
113,4
53,2
40
20
0
22,72
1997-2003
20
2000-2006
14,52
15
10
9,27
14,06
8,66
5
0
Oxidised
Reduced
Total
Oxidised
Reduced
Total
Average depostions - Kattegat
Figure 12. Comparison of calculated annual
average depositions of oxidised, reduced and
total nitrogen to the BSAP sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the periods: 1997-2003 and 20002003. Units: kt N per year.
Deposition (kt N per year)
25
1997-2003
20
19,41
2000-2006
18,27
15
10,60
10
8,81
8,26
10,00
5
0
Oxidised
Reduced
Total
Table 2. The reduction of calculated annual average deposition of oxidised, reduced and total
nitrogen to the BSAP sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in the period 2000-2003.compared to
period 1997-2003, Units: the percent of annual deposition calculated for the period 19972003.
Sub-basin
Bothnian Bay
Bothnian Sea
Gulf of Finland
Gulf of Riga
Baltic Proper
Danish Straits
Kattegat
Oxidised
-4,1
-6,5
-1,4
-2,7
-6,0
-3,2
-5,6
13
Deposition
Reduced
-4,4
-6,6
-1,0
-1,0
-4,5
-4,5
-5,9
Total
-4,2
-6,5
-1,3
-1,9
-5,3
-4,5
-5,9
4. Contributions of country and shipping emissions to the
deposition
The EMEP model was used to calculate contributions of emission sources in each HELCOM
country and from the international shipping on the Baltic Sea to oxidised, reduced and total
nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea and its BSAP sub-basins. Computations were made first
for each year of the period 1997-2006 and than the average values were calculated for each of
the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-20006.
It should be mentioned here that annual nitrogen depositions to the Baltic Sea and its subbasins calculated as a sum of contributions from individual sources and those calculated
directly from the model run with all sources including can differ up to approximately 20%.
Non-linear chemical reactions included in the EMEP model are probably the main reason for
the differences, but more research is needed in order to find more precisely what is causing
these differences and eventually eliminate them. In the mean time, we suggest to use the
results of source receptor calculations only as an indication of relative contributions and the
total deposition value from the model run with all emission sources included.
The contributions from HELCOM sources defined as a sum of contributions from all
HELCOM Contracting Parties (CPs) and ship traffic are similar for the periods 1997-2003
and 2000-2006, with differences not larger than 3% for all of the sub-basins. The largest
differences: 2% lower contribution of oxidised nitrogen and 3% higher contributions of
reduced nitrogen were found for the Gulf of Riga sub-basin. The HELCOM contributions to
oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen depositions in the entire Baltic Sea basin are 1% lower in
the period 2000-2006 than in the period 1997-2000. The same pattern can be noticed for most
of the sub-basins. In the period 2000-2006, the HELCOM contributions to oxidised, reduced
and total nitrogen deposition are lower in the period 2000-2006 for majority of sub-basins.
The relative contribution of HELCOM sources is larger for the deposition of reduced nitrogen
(61-86%) than for the deposition of oxidised nitrogen (36-58%).
The lowest contribution of HELCOM sources to oxidised nitrogen deposition can be noticed
for the Danish Straits and the Gulf of Riga sub-basins, 36% and 37% for the periods 19972003 and 2000-2006, respectively. The highest contributions of the HELCOM sources to
oxidised nitrogen deposition (58% for both periods) can be seen for the Bothnian Bay subbasin. In general HELCOM contribution to oxidised nitrogen deposition is decreasing from
the northern part to the southern part of the Baltic Sea.
The opposite deposition gradient appears for reduced nitrogen, with the largest contribution of
the HELCOM sources visible in the south. The maximum contribution of the HELCOM
sources to reduced nitrogen deposition (86% for both periods) can be noticed for the Danish
Strait sub-basin and the minimum (62% for the period 1997-2003 and 61% for the period
2000-2006) for the Gulf of Finland sub-basin.
For the entire Baltic Sea sub-basin and its sub-basins contribution of HELCOM sources to
total nitrogen deposition varies depending on sub-basin in range 36%-77%. The HELCOM
sources contribute most to total nitrogen deposition in the Danish Strait sub-basin (77% for
both periods) and least to total nitrogen deposition in the Gulf of Riga sub-basin (36% for
both periods).
14
The contributions from the individual HELCOM CPs and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea are
presented separately for the entire Baltic Sea basin and for each of its BSAP sub-basins. For
the entire Baltic Sea and for all its sub-basins, the emission sources from Germany, Poland
and the international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea are the major contributors to nitrogen
deposition.
4.1 Contributions to the Baltic Sea
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Baltic Sea basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.13, 14 and 15,
respectively.
Concerning contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions, situation is similar to both periods
with HELCOM sources contributing to half of the oxidised nitrogen deposition. Emissions
from Germany, ship traffic and Poland are three major contributors to the deposition.
Contributions from most of the sources are slightly lower in the period 2000-2006 than in the
period 1997-2006 with the exception of the Baltic Sea ship and Russian emissions
contributions being 1% higher in the period 2000-2006. Contribution from Sweden is 1%
lower in the same period.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contribution of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition is much higher: 74% in the period 1997-2003 and 73% in the period
2000-2006. Germany, Denmark, Poland and Sweden are the major contributors to reduced
nitrogen deposition in the entire Baltic Sea basin. Contributions from Germany are higher and
all other HELCOM sources are lower or remain on the same level in the period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are very similar with contribution
from all HELCOM sources being 1% lower in the period 2000-2006. Five major contributors
to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are: Germany, Poland, Denmark, Sweden and the
ship traffic. Only contributions from the ship traffic are higher in the period 2000-2006.
15
Baltic Sea
Deposition (kt N / yr)
20
18
1997-2003
16
2000-2006
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
DE
BA
PL
RU
SE
DK
FI
LT
EE
LV
Source country
Baltic Sea 1997-2003
DE
14 %
PL
10 %
RE
50 %
BA
9 % RU
LV
1%
LT
FI
1 %EE
3%
1%
SE
4%
4%
DK
3%
Baltic Sea 2000-2006
DE
14 %
BA
9%
RE
51 %
SE
3%
LV
1%
EE
1%
LT DK
1% 3%
PL
9%
RU
5%
FI
3%
Figure 13. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the entire Baltic Sea basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
16
Baltic Sea
Deposition (kt N / yr)
25
1997-2003
20
2000-2006
15
10
5
0
DE
DK
PL
SE
FI
LT
RU
LV
EE
Source country
Baltic Sea 1997-2003
RE
26 %
DE
23 %
EE
1%
LV
1%
LT
3%
RU FI
3%3%
DK
17 %
PL
14 %
SE
9%
Baltic Sea 2000-2006
RE
27 %
DE
24 %
EE
1%
LV
1%
RU
2%
LT FI
3 %3 %
DK
17 %
SE
8%
PL
14 %
Figure 14. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the entire Baltic Sea basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
17
Baltic Sea
45,000
Deposition (kt N / yr)
40,000
1997-2003
35,000
2000-2006
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0,000
DE
PL
DK
SE
BA
RU
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Baltic Sea 1997-2003
DE
18 %
RE
39 %
PL
12 %
EE
DK
1%
LV
9%
SE
LT
1%
2 % FI RU BA 6 %
3%
5%
4%
Baltic Sea 2000-2006
DE
19 %
RE
40 %
PL
12 %
LV
DK
1%
SE 9 %
EE LT
6%
1 % 2 % FI
RU BA
2%
5
%
3%
Figure 15. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the entire Baltic Sea basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
18
4.2 Contributions to the Bothnian Bay sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Bothnian Bay sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.16, 17
and 18, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to Bothnian Bay sub-basin are similar for both
periods with HELCOM sources contributing 58%. Emissions from Finland, Germany, Russia,
Sweden, ship traffic and Poland are the major contributors to the deposition. Contributions
from Germany, Russia, and the ship traffic are higher and contributions from remaining
sources lower in the period 2000-20006 than in the period 1997-2006.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are higher: 69% in the period 1997-2003 and 71% in the period 20002006. Finland, Sweden, Germany, Poland and Russia are the major contributors to reduced
nitrogen deposition in the Bothnian Bay sub-basin. All contributions are lower, but the
relative contributions from Sweden, Germany and Russia are 1% higher in the period 20002006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are similar with contribution from
all HELCOM sources being 1% lower in the period 2000-2006. Six major contributors to total
nitrogen depositions in both periods are: Finland, Germany, Russia, Sweden, Poland, and the
ship traffic. The relative contributions from Germany and the ship traffic are 1% higher and
contributions from Finland, Russia, Sweden, and Poland are 1% lower in the period 20002006.
19
Bothnian Bay
Deposition (kt N / yr)
0,8
0,7
1997-2003
0,6
0,5
2000-2006
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
FI
DE
RU
BA
SE
PL
DK
EE
LT
LV
Source country
Bothnian Bay 1997-2003
FI
13 %
RU
9%
RE
42 %
DE
9%
LV
EE
PL
1 % LT
1 % DK 7 %
1%
2%
BA
7%
SE
8%
Bothnian Bay 2000-2006
FI
11 %
RE
42 %
DE
10 %
RU
10 %
LV
1 % LT
1%
EE DK
1% 2%
PL
7%
SE
7%
BA
8%
Figure 16. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Bothnian Bay sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
20
Bothnian Bay
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,2
1997-2003
1
2000-2006
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
FI
SE
DE
PL
RU
DK
LT
EE
LV
Source country
Bothnian Bay 1997-2003
RE
31 %
FI
29 %
LV
1%
EE
1%
LT
2%
DK DE
2 %8 %
RU
8%
PL
9%
SE
9%
Bothnian Bay 2000-2006
RE
29 %
LV
1%
EE
1%
LT DK RU
2% 3%7%
FI
29 %
PL
9%
DE
9%
SE
10 %
Figure 17. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Bothnian Bay sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition.
21
Bothnian Bay
Deposition (kt N / yr)
2,000
1,800
1997-2003
1,600
1,400
2000-2006
1,200
1,000
0,800
0,600
0,400
0,200
0,000
FI
DE
RU
SE
PL
BA
DK
LT
EE
LV
Source country
Bothnian Bay 1997-2003
FI
20 %
RE
36 %
RU
9%
EE
1%
LV
PL
1 % LT
BA
1 % DK
8%
4%
2%
SE
9%
DE
9%
Bothnian Bay 2000-2006
FI
19 %
RE
37 %
DE
10 %
EE
1%
LV
PL
1 % LT
BA
1 % DK
7%
5%
3%
SE
8%
RU
8%
Figure 18. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Bothnian Bay sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
22
4.3 Contributions to the Bothnian Sea sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Bothnian Sea sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.19, 20
and 21, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to Bothnian Sea sub-basin are similar for both
periods with HELCOM sources contributing 54% and 55%. Emissions from Germany, ship
traffic, Poland, Sweden, Russia and Finland are the major contributors to the deposition.
Contributions from Germany and ship traffic are increasing in time, whereas contributions
from other sources are lower in the period 2000-20006 than in the period 1997-2006. The
relative contribution from Germany and ship traffic are higher and the relative contributions
from lower in the period 2000-2006.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are higher again: 62% in the period 1997-2003 and 63% in the period
2000-2006. Poland, Sweden, Germany and Finland are the major contributors to reduced
nitrogen deposition in the Bothnian Sea sub-basin. Only contribution from Germany is higher
in the period 2000-2006. The relative contribution from Germany is 1% higher, whereas
contribution from Poland is 1% lower in the period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are similar with contribution from
all HELCOM sources being 1% higher in the period 2000-2006. Six major contributors to
total nitrogen depositions in both periods are: Germany, Poland, Sweden, Finland, ship traffic.
and Russia. Only contributions from Germany and ship traffic are higher in the period 20002006.The relative contributions from Germany and ship traffic are 1% higher and contribution
from Russia is 1% lower in the period 2000-2006.
23
Bothnian Sea
Deposition (kt N / yr)
3,500
3,000
1997-2003
2,500
2000-2006
2,000
1,500
1,000
0,500
0,000
DE
PL
SE
FI
BA
RU
DK
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Bothnian Sea 1997-2003
DE
11 %
RE
46 %
EE LV
LT DK RU
1% 1%
1 % 3 %6 %
PL
9%
BA
9%
SE
7
%
FI
6%
Bothnian Sea 2000-2006
DE
12 %
RE
45 %
LV
1%
EE
1%
LT
1%
BA
10 %
PL
9%
SE
7
%
RU
FI
DK 5 % 6 %
3%
Figure 19. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Bothnian Sea sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
24
Bothnian Sea
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,6
1,4
1997-2003
1,2
2000-2006
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
PL
SE
DE
FI
RU
DK
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Bothnian Sea 1997-2003
RE
38 %
PL
14 %
SE
13 %
FI
11 %
LV
1%
EE LT
DK
1% 3%
3%
RU
5%
DE
11 %
Bothnian Sea 2000-2006
RE
37 %
PL
13 %
SE
13 %
EE
1%
DE
12 %
LV
1%
LT DK RU
3% 4% 5%
FI
11 %
Figure 20. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Bothnian Sea sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition.
25
Bothnian Sea
Deposition (kt N / yr)
3,500
3,000
1997-2003
2,500
2000-2006
2,000
1,500
1,000
0,500
0,000
DE
PL
SE
FI
BA
RU
DK
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Bothnian Sea 1997-2003
DE
11 %
RE
43 %
PL
11 %
SE
9%
EE
1%
LV LT
1% 2%
FI
RU 8 %
DK BA 6 %
3% 5%
Bothnian Sea 2000-2006
DE
12 %
RE
42 %
PL
11 %
SE
9%
LV
1 % EE
1%
LT
2%
FI
BA 8 %
DK RU 6 %
3% 5%
Figure 21. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Bothnian Sea sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
26
4.4 Contributions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Gulf of Finland sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.22,
23 and 24, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin are the same
for both periods with HELCOM sources contributing 56%. Emissions from Russia, Germany,
ship traffic, Poland, and Finland are the major contributors to the deposition. Contributions
from Russia, ship traffic, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia are increasing in time, whereas
contributions from Germany, Finland, Sweden, Estonia and Denmark are lower in the period
2000-20006 than in the period 1997-2006. The relative contributions from the ship traffic and
Poland are increasing 1% from the first period to the second.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are higher again: 62% in the period 1997-2003 and 61% in the period
2000-2006. Russia, Germany, Poland, Estonia and Finland are the major contributors to
reduced nitrogen deposition in the Gulf of Finland sub-basin. Contributions from Russia,
Estonia, Sweden and Denmark Germany are higher, whereas contributions from Germany,
Poland, Finland, Lithuania and Latvia are lower in the period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are similar with contribution from
all HELCOM sources being 2% lower in the period 2000-2006. Russia is the number one
contributor to total nitrogen deposition in both periods. The contributions from Germany,
Poland, ship traffic, Lithuania and Latvia are higher and contribution from Russia, Finland,
Estonia, Sweden and Denmark are lower in the period 2000-2006. Th relative contributions
from Russia, Estonia, and Denmark are 1% lower and the relative contributions from ship
traffic 1% higher in the period 2000-2006
27
Gulf of Finland
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,2
1997-2003
1
2000-2006
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
RU
DE
BA
PL
FI
SE
EE
DK
LT
LV
Source country
Gulf of Finland 1997-2003
RU
13 %
DE
10 %
RE
44 %
LV
1 % LT
1%
SE
DK
EE 4 %
2%
3%
FI
7%
BA
8%
PL
7%
Gulf of Finland 2000-2006
RU
13 %
DE
10 %
RE
44 %
LV
1%
LT
1%
DK
2%
FI
SE
EE4 % 6 %
2%
BA
9%
PL
8%
Figure 22. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
28
Gulf of Finland
Deposition (kt N / yr)
0,7
0,6
1997-2003
0,5
2000-2006
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
RU
DE
PL
EE
FI
SE
LT
DK
LV
Source country
Gulf of Finland 1997-2003
RE
38 %
RU
13 %
PL
11 %
DE
10 %
LV DK
2% 3%
LT
3%
SE
4%
FI
7%
EE
9%
Gulf of Finland 2000-2006
RE
39 %
RU
11 %
DE
11 %
PL
11 %
LV
2%
DK
3%
SE
LT 4 %
4%
FI
7%
EE
8%
Figure 22. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
29
Gulf of Finland
1,800
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,600
1997-2003
1,400
2000-2006
1,200
1,000
0,800
0,600
0,400
0,200
0,000
RU
DE
PL
FI
BA
EE
SE
DK
LT
LV
Source country
Gulf of Finland 1997-2003
RU
13 %
DE
10 %
RE
41 %
LT
2%
LV
1%
PL
9%
DK
3%
FI
BA 7 %
SE EE
5%
4% 5%
Gulf of Finland 2000-2006
RU
12 %
DE
10 %
RE
43 %
PL
9%
LT
2 %LV
1%
DK
2%
FI
BA 7 %
SE EE
6%
4 %4 %
Figure 24. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
30
4.5 Contributions to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.25, 26
and 27, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin are the same
for both periods with HELCOM sources contributing 50% and 52%. Emissions from Russia,
Germany, Poland and ship traffic are the major contributors to the deposition. Contributions
from Poland, ship traffic and Russia are increasing whereas contributions from the rest of the
sources are lower in the period 2000-206 than in the period 1997-2006. The relative
contributions from Poland and ship traffic are increasing 1% from the first period to the
second.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are higher again: 61% in the period 1997-2003 and 64% in the period
2000-2006. Poland, Germany, Lithuania and Latvia are the major contributors to reduced
nitrogen deposition in the Gulf of Riga sub-basin. Contributions from Germany, Lithuania
and Latvia are higher, whereas contributions from other sources are lower in the period 20002006. The relative contributions from Germany, Lithuania and Latvia are 1% higher in the
period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are similar with contribution from
all HELCOM sources being 2% lower in the period 2000-2006. Two major contributors to
total nitrogen depositions in both periods are: Germany and Poland. The contributions from
Poland, ship traffic, Lithuania and Latvia are higher in the period 2000-2006. The relative
contributions from ship traffic are 1% higher and relative contributions from Denmark 1%
lower in the period 2000-2006.
31
Gulf of Riga
0,9
Deposition (kt N / yr)
0,8
1997-2003
0,7
2000-2006
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
DE
PL
BA
RU
SE
DK
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Gulf of Riga 1997-2003
DE
13 %
PL
10 %
RE
50 %
BA
9%
EE LT LV
1% 1% 1%
FI
3%
RU
SE 5 %
DK 4 %
3%
Gulf of Riga 2000-2006
DE
13 %
PL
11 %
RE
48 %
EE
1%
DK
LV LT
3
%
1% 1%
BA
10 %
RU
SE 5 %
FI 4 %
3%
Figure 25. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
32
Gulf of Riga
Deposition (kt N / yr)
0,7
0,6
1997-2003
0,5
2000-2006
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
PL
DE
LT
LV
SE
EE
DK
RU
FI
Source country
Gulf of Riga 1997-2003
RE
39 %
PL
15 %
DE
13 %
LT
8%
FI
1%
RU
3%
DK
4%
EE
4%
SE
5%
LV
8%
Gulf of Riga 2000-2006
RE
36 %
PL
15 %
DE
14 %
LT
9%
FI
1%
RU
3%
EE
DK 4 %
4%
SE
5%
LV
9%
Figure 26. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
33
Gulf of Riga
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,400
1,200
1997-2003
2000-2006
1,000
0,800
0,600
0,400
0,200
0,000
DE
PL
BA
RU
LT
LV
SE
DK
EE
FI
Source country
Gulf of Riga 1997-2003
DE
14 %
PL
12 % BA
5%
RE
45 %
RU
4%
DK
FI EE
4
%
2% 2%
SE
LT LV
4%
4% 4%
Gulf of Riga 2000-2006
DE
14 %
PL
12 %
RE
45 %
FI
EE DK
2% 2% 3%
SE
4%
LV
4%
LT
4%
BA
6%
RU
4%
Figure 27. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
34
4.6 Contributions to the Baltic Proper sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Baltic Proper sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.28, 29
and 30, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to the Baltic Proper sub-basin are the same for
both periods with HELCOM sources contributing 48% and 49%. Emissions from Germany,
Poland and ship traffic are the major contributors to the deposition. Only contributions from
the ship traffic and Denmark are increasing whereas contributions from the rest of the sources
are lower in the period 2000-20006 than in the period 1997-2006. The relative contributions
from the ship traffic and Russia are increasing 1% and contributions from Germany
decreasing 1% from the first period to the second.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are much higher: 73% in tboth periods. Germany, Poland, Sweden and
Denmark are the major contributors to reduced nitrogen deposition in the Baltic Proper subbasin. Contributions from Germany and Latvia are higher, whereas from other sources are
lower in the period 2000-2006. The relative contributions from Germany increase 2% in the
period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are similar with contribution from
all HELCOM sources being 2% lower in the period 2000-2006. Five major contributors to
total nitrogen depositions in both periods are: Germany, Poland, Sweden, Denmark and the
ship traffic. Contributions from all sources except the ship traffic, Russia and Latvia are lower
in the period 2000-2006 than in the period 1997-2003. The relative contributions from
Germany and Baltic Sea traffic increase 2% in the period 2000-2006.
35
Baltic Proper
Deposition (kt N / yr)
12
1997-2003
10
2000-2006
8
6
4
2
0
DE
PL
BA
DK
SE
RU
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Baltic Proper 1997-2003
DE
16 %
PL
11 %
RE
52 %
BA
9%
EE
0%
DK
SE 3 %
LV LT FI RU 3 %
0%1% 2% 3%
Baltic Proper 2000-2006
DE
15 %
PL
11 %
RE
51 %
EE
0%
LV LT
FI
0% 1%
2%
SE
3%
BA
10 %
RU
DK 4 %
3%
Figure 28. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Baltic Proper sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
36
Baltic Proper
Deposition (kt N / yr)
14
12
1997-2003
10
2000-2006
8
6
4
2
0
DE
PL
SE
DK
LT
RU
LV
FI
EE
Source country
Baltic Proper 1997-2003
RE
27 %
DE
24 %
EE
0%
FI
1 % LV
RU LT DK
1%
2 % 3 % 11 %
PL
20 %
SE
11 %
Baltic Proper 2000-2006
RE
27 %
DE
26 %
EE
0%
FI
1%
LV
1%
RU LT DK
2 % 3 % 10 %
PL
20 %
SE
10 %
Figure 29. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Baltic Proper sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
37
Baltic Proper
Deposition (kt N / yr)
30,000
1997-2003
25,000
2000-2006
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0,000
DE
PL
DK
SE
BA
RU
LT
FI
LV
EE
Source country
Baltic Proper 1997-2003
DE
19 %
RE
42 %
PL
15 %
EE
DK
0 % LV
LT
6
%
BA
RU
1 % FI
2
%
5
%
1%
3%
SE
6%
Baltic Proper 2000-2006
DE
20 %
RE
40 %
PL
15 %
DK
EE
SE
6
%
LV
0%
LT RU BA 6 %
1 % FI
1 %2 % 3 % 6 %
Figure 30. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Baltic Proper sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N
per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
38
4.7 Contributions to the Danish Straits sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Danish Straits sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.31, 32
and 33, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to the Danish Straits sub-basin are similar for
both periods with HELCOM sources contributing 37% and 36%, however these contributions
are relatively small compared to other sub-basins. Emissions from Germany, ship traffic,
Poland and Denmark are the major contributors to the deposition with the dominating position
of Germany’s contribution: 20% in the period 1997-2003 and 18%. In the period 2000-2006.
Contributions from the ship traffic and Russia are increasing whereas contributions from
Germany are decreasing in the period 2000-2006. The relative contributions from the ship
traffic are increasing 1% and contributions from Germany decreasing 2% from the first period
to the second.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are very high: 86% in the period 1997-2003 and in the period 2000-2006.
Germany and Denmark are the major and dominating contributors to reduced nitrogen
deposition in the Danish Straits sub-basin. Contribution from Germany is higher, whereas
contributions from Denmark and Poland are lower in the period 2000-2006.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are the same – 67%. There are two
major and dominating contributors to total nitrogen depositions in both periods: Germany and
Denmark. Absolute contributions from these two sources are lower in the period 2000-2006
than in the period 1997-2003, but relative contributions from Germany are 1% higher,
whereas contributions from Denmark are 1% lower in the period 2000-20006.
39
Danish Straits
2
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,8
1997-2003
1,6
1,4
2000-2006
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
DE
BA
PL
DK
SE
RU
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Danish Straits 1997-2003
DE
20 %
BA
7%
PL
DK
5%
3%
SE
1%
RE
63 %
LV EE
0% 0%
LT
0%
FI
0%
RU
1%
Danish Straits 2000-2006
DE
18 %
BA
8 % PL
5%
DK
3%
RE
64 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
RU
LT FI 1 %
0% 0%
SE
1%
Figure 31. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Danish Straits sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
40
Danish Straits
Deposition (kt N / yr)
7
6
1997-2003
5
2000-2006
4
3
2
1
0
DE
DK
PL
SE
LT
RU
LV
FI
EE
Source country
Danish Straits 1997-2003
LV
0%
RU
0%
LT
0 % SE
1%
FI
0%
EE
0%
RE
14 %
DE
43 %
PL
3%
DK
39 %
Danish Straits 2000-2006
LV
0%
RU
0%
FI
0%
EE
0%
RE
14 %
DE
45 %
LT
0%
SE
1%
PL
2%
DK
38 %
Figure 32. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Danish Straits sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
41
Danish Straits
9,000
Deposition (kt N / yr)
8,000
1997-2003
7,000
2000-2006
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0,000
DE
DK
PL
BA
SE
RU
LT
FI
LV
EE
Source country
Danish Straits 1997-2003
RE
33 %
DE
34 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
FI
0%
LT RU
SE
0% 0%
1%
BA
3%
DK
25 %
PL
4%
Danish Straits 2000-2006
RE
33 %
DE
35 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
FI
0%
LT RU
0% 1%
SE
1%
BA
3%
DK
24 %
PL
3%
Figure 33. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Danish Straits sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt
N per year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the
Baltic Sea.
42
4.8 Contributions to the Kattegat sub-basin
Calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the HELCOM Contracting Parties
and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to
the Kattegat sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006 are shown in Fig.34, 35 and
36, respectively.
Contributions to oxidised nitrogen depositions to the Kattegat sub-basin are similar for both
periods with HELCOM sources contributing 37% and 36%. These contributions are relatively
small compared to other sub-basins except the Danish Straits sub-basin. Emissions from
Germany, ship traffic and Poland are the major contributors to the deposition with the
dominating position of Germany’s contribution (16%). Contributions from the ship traffic and
Russia are increasing whereas contributions from Germany are lower in the period 200020006 than in the period 1997-2006. The relative contributions from the ship traffic are
increasing 1% and contributions from Germany decreasing 1% from the first period to the
second.
Compared to oxidised nitrogen deposition, contributions of HELCOM sources to reduced
nitrogen deposition are very high: again: 83% in the period 1997-2003 and in the period 20002006. Emissions from Denmark are dominating (53%) the contributors to reduced nitrogen
deposition in the Kattegat sub-basin. This very high contribution of Denmark does not change
from the first period to the second.
Contributions to total nitrogen depositions in both periods are the same – 61%. There are two
major and dominating contributors to total nitrogen depositions in both periods: Denmark and
Germany. Absolute contributions from these two sources are lower in the period 2000-2006
than in the period 1997-2003, but relative contributions from from Denmark remains on the
same level in the period 2000-2006.
43
Kattegat
Deposition (kt N / yr)
1,6
1,4
1997-2003
1,2
2000-2006
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
DE
BA
PL
DK
SE
RU
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Kattegat 1997-2003
DE
16 %
BA
7%
PL
6 % DK
4 % SE
2%
RE
63 %
LV
0%
EE
0%
LT
0%
RU
1%
FI
1%
Kattegat 2000-2006
DE
15 %
BA
8%
PL
6%
DK
3%
RE
64 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
FI
LT
1%
0%
RU SE
1% 2%
Figure 34. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of oxidised
nitrogen to the Kattegat sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N per
year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the Baltic
44
Sea.
Kattegat
Deposition (kt N / yr)
6
1997-2003
5
2000-2006
4
3
2
1
0
DK
DE
SE
PL
LT
RU
LV
FI
EE
Source country
Kattegat 1997-2003
EE
FI 0 %
0%
LT
0%
RE
17 %
LV
0%
RU
0%
PL
5%
DK
53 %
SE
7%
DE
18 %
Kattegat 2000-2006
RU
0%
LT
0%
FI
LV
0%
0%
PL
4%
EE
0%
RE
17 %
DK
53 %
SE
7%
DE
19 %
Figure 35. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to the Kattegat sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N per
year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the Baltic
45
Sea.
Kattegat
Deposition (kt N / yr)
7,000
6,000
1997-2003
5,000
2000-2006
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0,000
DK
DE
PL
SE
BA
RU
FI
LT
LV
EE
Source country
Kattegat 1997-2003
RE
39 %
DK
30 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
FI
PL
0 %LT RU BA SE
5
0% 1% 3%5% %
DE
17 %
Kattegat 2000-2006
RE
39 %
DK
29 %
EE
0%
LV
0%
FI
LT RU BA SE PL
0%
0% 1% 4%5%5%
DE
17 %
Figure 36. Comparison of calculated annual average contributions of emissions from the
HELCOM Contracting Parties and ship traffic on the Baltic Sea to the deposition of total
nitrogen to the Kattegat sub-basin in the periods: 1997-2003 and 2000-2006. Units: kt N per
year and % of total deposition. BA denotes the emissions from the ship traffic on the Baltic
46
Sea.
5. Contributions of emission sectors to nitrogen
deposition
In the frame of the project the EMEP model was for the first time used to calculate
contributions of selected emission sectors in each HELCOM country to oxidised, reduced and
total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea and its BSAP sub-basins. Computations were made
for two different years: 2000 and 2003. The assumption was that these two years should
represent the two considered periods, but it is difficult to judge how good this representation
is. The ideal solution would be to perform the calculations for each year of the period 19972006 and than average the results in the same way as described in the previous Chapter.
Unfortunately, this operation requires a very large number of the model runs and is limited by
the project resources.
Contributions from three groups of emission sectors were calculated for each of the
HELCOM Contracting Party:
• Sectors 1, 2 and 3 – related to emissions from combustion processes;
• Sectors 7 mand 8 – related to emissions from the transportation;
• Sector 10 – related to emissions from agriculture.
All these selected sectors are the major contributors to the deposition of oxidised, reduced and
total nitrogen in the Baltic Sea and its sub-basins.
The results are presented later on, separately for each sub-basin of the Baltic Sea and for the
entire basin of the Baltic Sea however there are some common features for all sub-basins,
which we describe first.
The transportation and combustion emission sectors are the major contributors to oxidised
nitrogen deposition to all sub-basins of the Baltic Sea. For all emitters except Poland,
transportation sectors are the major contributors. From Poland, the combustion sectors
contribute more into oxidised nitrogen deposition than the transportation sectors, for all subbasins. The contributions from the agriculture sector are visible, but significantly smaller in
the oxidised nitrogen deposition.
The agriculture sector entirely dominates contributions from nine out of ten HELCOM
Contracting Parties to reduced nitrogen depositions in all Baltic Sea sub-basins. The only
exception is Russia, where the contributions from the transportation and combustion sectors
are often larger than the contributions from the agriculture sector.
The agriculture sector is also the major contributor to total nitrogen deposition in most of the
sub-basins of the Baltic Sea, especially for countries with large emissions. There are only
several exceptions especially for Russia, but also for Finland and Estonia, where the
contributions from the transportation and combustion sectors to total nitrogen deposition are
higher tan the contributions from the agriculture sector.
For all sub-basins, contributions to all kinds of nitrogen deposition are lower in 2003 than in
the year 2000. However, the proportions between contributions from different sectors are very
similar for both years and for all HELCOM countries except Finland. The contribution of
47
Finnish combustion sectors to oxidised and total nitrogen deposition is significantly higher in
the year 2003 than in the year 2000.
5.1 Contributions to the Baltic Sea basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the entire Baltic Sea basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 37.
S1+S2+S3
S10
16
16
14
14
12
10
8
6
4
S10
12
10
8
6
4
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Sea 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Sea 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
30
S7+S8
S10
30
25
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
25
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
2
2
20
15
10
20
15
10
5
5
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Sea 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Sea 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
35
S7+S8
S10
35
30
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
30
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Sea 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Baltic Sea 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
25
20
15
10
5
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
Figure 37. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the entire Baltic Sea basin in
the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
The major changes between the year 2000 and 2003 are lower contributions of transportation
sectors from Germany and higher contributions of combustion sectors from Finland to
oxidised nitrogen deposition in 2003.
48
5.2 Contributions to the Botnian Bay sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Bothnian Bay sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 38.
S1+S2+S3
S10
0,6
0,6
0,5
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
S10
0,4
0,3
0,2
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Bay 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Bay 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
1,4
S7+S8
S10
1,4
1,2
1,2
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
0,1
0
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Bay 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Bay 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
1,4
1,4
1,2
1,2
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Bay 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Bothnian Bay 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
S7+S8
S10
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
Contributor
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Figure 38. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Bothnian Bay sub-basin
in the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
Contributions from all German emission sectors to oxidised and total nitrogen deposition in
2003 are higher than the contributions in 2000. Contributions of transportation and agriculture
emission sectors from Finland to all kinds of nitrogen deposition are lower in 2003 than in
49
2000. In both years, there are relatively high contributions of combustion and transportation
sectors from Russia to reduced nitrogen deposition. Contribution of these sectors to reduced
nitrogen deposition is also visible, however small for Germany, Poland and Sweden as
emitters.
5.3 Contributions to the Botnian Sea sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Bothnian Sea sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 39.
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
S10
1,4
1,4
1,2
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
1,8
1,8
1,6
1,6
1,4
1,4
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S10
0,2
0
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
S7+S8
S10
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
2,5
S7+S8
S10
2,5
2
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
2
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
1,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
1,6
S1+S2+S3
Bothnian Sea 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
1,5
1
1,5
1
0,5
0,5
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
Figure 39. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Bothnian Sea sub-basin
in the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
50
The major change from the year 2000 to 2003 is the increase of the contribution from
combustion sources in Finland to oxidised and total nitrogen deposition. Contributions of
combustion and transportation sectors in Russia to reduced nitrogen deposition are relatively
smaller in 2003 than in the year 2000. Contributions of combustion and transportation sectors
located in Germany, Poland and Sweden to reduced nitrogen deposition are also visible, but
small. They remain on the same level in 2000 and in 2003.
5.4 Contributions to the Gulf of Finland sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Gulf of Finland sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 40.
S1+S2+S3
S10
0,7
0,7
0,6
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
S10
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Finland 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Finland 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
0,7
S7+S8
S10
0,7
0,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
0,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
0,1
0
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0,1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Finland 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Finland 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
1
S7+S8
S10
1
0,9
0,9
0,8
0,8
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Finland 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Gulf of Finland 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,2
0,1
0,1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
Contributor
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Figure 40. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Gulf of Finland sub-basin
in the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
51
The contributions of combustion sectors in Estonia and Finland to oxidised nitrogen
deposition are higher in 2003 than in 2000, whereas the relative contributions of
transportation sectors, in these countries are lower. Contributions of agricultural sectors in
Germany and Poland to reduced nitrogen deposition are lower in 2003 than in 2000.
Contributions of combustion and agriculture sectors from Finland to total nitrogen deposition
increase in 2003 compared to 2000.
5.5 Contributions the to the Gulf of Riga sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 41.
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
S10
0,6
S10
0,5
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0,1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
0,6
S7+S8
S10
0,6
0,5
0,5
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
Contributor
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2000
Total nitrogen
S10
0,8
S1+S2+S3
Gulf of Riga 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S7+S8
S10
0,8
0,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
0,7
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
Contributor
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Figure 41. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Gulf of Riga sub-basin in
the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
52
Concerning oxidised nitrogen deposition the major difference between the years 2000 and
2003 is the increase of combustion sectors contribution from Finland in the year 2003. There
is not much change from 2000 to 2003 in the contributions to reduced nitrogen deposition, but
it is interesting to see,.still very small, but more visible contributions of combustion and
transportation sectors from Germany, Russia, Poland and Sweden. Contributions to deposition
of total nitrogen are very similar in both years.
5.6 Contributions to the Baltic Proper sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Baltic Proper sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 42.
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
S10
8
8
7
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
16
S7+S8
S10
16
14
14
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S10
1
0
12
10
8
6
4
2
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
16
S7+S8
S10
16
14
14
12
12
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
9
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
9
S1+S2+S3
Baltic Proper 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
10
8
6
4
2
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
Contributor
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Figure 42. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Baltic Proper sub-basin
in the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
53
Contributions to oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen depositions are very similar for both
years. The only difference can be noticed for higher contributions of combustion sectors from
Finland to oxidised and total nitrogen deposition in the year 2003.
5.7 Contributions to the Danish Straits sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Danish Straits sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 43.
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
S10
1,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S10
1,4
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
8
S7+S8
S10
8
7
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
7
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
1,6
1,4
6
5
4
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Kattegat 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
S7+S8
S10
6
8
7
5
6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
5
4
3
2
4
3
2
1
1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
Contributor
Figure 43. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
Parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Danish Straits sub-basin
54
in the years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
Practically there are only four contributors to all kinds of nitrogen deposition: Germany,
Denmark Poland and Sweden, with contributions from Germany and Denmark being much
higher than all others. The pattern for the contributions is very similar for 2000 and 2003.
5.8 Contributions to the Kattegat sub-basin
Contributions of selected emission sectors from individual HELCOM Contracting parties to
the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Kattegat sub-basin in the years
2000 and 2003 are shown in Fig. 44.
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2000
Oxidised nitrogen
S10
1,6
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S10
1,4
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Kattegat 2000
Reduced nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Kattegat 2003
Reduced nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
6
6
5
5
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S7+S8
1,6
1,4
4
3
2
1
S7+S8
S10
4
3
2
1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
DE
DK
EE
FI
Contributor
LT
LV
PL
RU
SE
Contributor
S1+S2+S3
Kattegat 2000
Total nitrogen
S1+S2+S3
Kattegat 2003
Total nitrogen
S7+S8
S10
6
6
5
5
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
Deposition (kt N/ yr)
S1+S2+S3
Danish Straits 2003
Oxidised nitrogen
S7+S8
4
3
2
1
S7+S8
S10
4
3
2
1
0
0
DE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
DE
SE
DK
EE
FI
LT
LV
PL
RU
Contributor
Contributor
Figure 44. Contributions of selected emission sectors in individual HELCOM Contracting
55
SE
parties to the depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen in the Kattegat sub-basin in the
years 2000 and 2003. Units: kt N per year.
This case is quite similar to the previous one - contributions to the Danish Straits sub-basin.
Also, here, there are only four contributors to all kinds of nitrogen deposition: Germany,
Denmark Poland and Sweden, with dominating contributions from Germany and Denmark .
The pattern for the contributions is very similar for 2000 and 2003.
56
Conclusions
The following conclusions can be formulated based on the results of the project presented in
this report:
•
The changes made in the chemical reactions for nitrogen in latest version of the EMEP
unified model have impact not only on nitrogen concentrations, but nitrogen
depositions as well. Particularly, depositions of oxidised nitrogen computed with the
latest version are 10-15% lower than those computed with the previous version. On
the other hand, depositions of reduced nitrogen computed with the new model version
are 1-3% higher than with the old version..
•
For all years of the period 1997-2006 calculated annual depositions of oxidised,
nitrogen are higher than the depositions of reduced nitrogen for the Baltic Sea and its
all sub-basins.
•
A large inter-annual variation of calculated depositions is visible for the entire
considered period, but especially for the first part of it.
•
Calculated annual average depositions of oxidised, reduced and total nitrogen to the
Baltic Sea and its sub-basins are slightly lower in the period 2000-2006 than in the
period 2000-20006. The annual average depositions of oxidised, reduced and total
nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in the period 2000-2006 are lower than in the period 19972003 by 6%, 4% and 5%, respectively
•
The contributions from HELCOM sources defined as a sum of contributions from all
HELCOM Contracting Parties (CPs) and ship traffic are similar for the periods 19972003 and 2000-2006, with differences not larger than 3% for all of the sub-basins. The
largest differences: 2% lower contribution of oxidised nitrogen and 3% higher
contributions of reduced nitrogen were found for the Gulf of Riga sub-basin.
•
The relative contribution of HELCOM sources is larger for the deposition of reduced
nitrogen (61-86%) than for the deposition of oxidised nitrogen (36-58%).
•
The lowest contribution of HELCOM sources to oxidised nitrogen deposition can be
noticed for the Danish Straits and the Gulf of Riga sub-basins, 36% and 37% for the
periods 1997-2003 and 2000-2006, respectively. The highest contributions of the
HELCOM sources to oxidised nitrogen deposition (58% for both periods) can be seen
for the Bothnian Bay sub-basin. In general HELCOM contribution to oxidised
nitrogen deposition is decreasing from the northern part to the southern part of the
Baltic Sea.
•
The opposite deposition gradient appears for reduced nitrogen, with the largest
contribution of the HELCOM sources visible in the south. The maximum contribution
of the HELCOM sources to reduced nitrogen deposition (86% for both periods) can be
noticed for the Danish Strait sub-basin and the minimum (62% for the period 19972003 and 61% for the period 2000-2006) for the Gulf of Finland sub-basin.
57
•
For the entire Baltic Sea sub-basin and its sub-basins contribution of HELCOM
sources to total nitrogen deposition varies depending on sub-basin in range 36%-77%.
The HELCOM sources contribute most to total nitrogen deposition in the Danish
Strait sub-basin (77% for both periods) and least to total nitrogen deposition in the
Gulf of Riga sub-basin (36% for both periods).
•
The transportation and combustion emission sectors are the major contributors to
oxidised nitrogen deposition to all sub-basins of the Baltic Sea. For all emitters except
Poland, transportation sectors are the major contributors. From Poland, the combustion
sectors contribute more into oxidised nitrogen deposition than the transportation
sectors, for all sub-basins. The contributions from the agriculture sector are visible, but
significantly smaller in the oxidised nitrogen deposition.
•
The agriculture sector entirely dominates contributions from nine out of ten HELCOM
Contracting Parties to reduced nitrogen depositions in all Baltic Sea sub-basins. The
only exception is Russia, where the contributions from the transportation and
combustion sectors are often larger than the contributions from the agriculture sector.
•
The agriculture sector is also the major contributor to total nitrogen deposition in most
of the sub-basins of the Baltic Sea, especially for countries with large emissions. There
are only several exceptions especially for Russia, but also for Finland and Estonia,
where the contributions from the transportation and combustion sectors to total
nitrogen deposition are higher tan the contributions from the agriculture sector.
•
For all sub-basins, contributions to all kinds of nitrogen deposition are lower in 2003
than in the year 2000. However, the proportions between contributions from different
sectors are very similar for both years and for all HELCOM countries except Finland.
The contribution of Finnish combustion sectors to oxidised and total nitrogen
deposition is significantly higher in the year 2003 than in the year 2000.
58
References
[1] HELCOM web-site (2008): http://www.helcom.fi/
[2] Rönnberg C. and Bonsdorff E.: Baltic Sea eutrophication: area-specific ecological
consequences. Hydrobiologia, 2004, 40, 227-241.
[3] Patsch J.and Radach G.: Long-term simulation of the eutrophication of the North Sea:
temporal development of nutrients, chlorophyll and primary production in comparison to
observations. J. Sea Res., 1997, 38(3), 2275-2310.
[4] UNEP/FAO/WHO: Assessment of the State of Eutrophication in the Mediterranean Sea.
MAP Technical Series No. 106, UNEP, Athens 1996.
[5] Bucharest Convention web site (2008): http://www.blacksea-commission.org/main.htm
[6] OSPAR Convention web site (2008): http://www.ospar.org /
[7] Barcelona Convention web site (2008): http://www.unep.ch/regionalseas/regions/med/t_barcel.htm
[8] LRTAP Convention (1979): 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air
Pollution.
UN
Economic Commission for Europe. Palais des Nations, CH - 1211 Geneva 10,
Switzerland.
[9] EMEP web site (2008): http://www.emep.int/
[10] Bartnicki J., Gusev A. and Fagerli H.: Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen, Lead,
Cadmium, Mercury and Dioxins/Furans to the Baltic Sea in 2005. Meteorological
Synthesizing Centre - West of EMEP. EMEP MSC-W Technical Report 3/2007.
[11] Bartnicki J. and Fagerli H.: Atmospheric nitrogen in OSPAR Convention area in the
period 1990-2004. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - West of EMEP. EMEP MSC-W
Technical Report 4/2006.
[12] Simpson D., Fagerli H., Jonson J.E., Tsyro S., Wind P. and Tuovinen J.P.:
Transboundary acidification and eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe:
Unified EMEP model description. EMEP Status Report 2004. EMEP Report 1/2004 Part
1. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West, Oslo, Norway.
[13] Tarrason L., Fagerli H., Jonson J.E., Klein H., von Loon M., Posh M., Simpson D.,
Solberg S., Tsyro S., Thunis P., Vestreng V., White L. and Wind P.: Transboundary
acidification Eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe. EMEP Status Report
2004. EMEP Report 1/2004. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West, Oslo, Norway.
[14] Tarrason L., Benedictow A.C., Fagerli H., Jonson J.E., Klein H., von Loon M.,
Simpson D., Tsyro S., Vestreng V., Wind P., Forster C., Stohl A., Amman M., Cofala J.,
Langner J., Andersson C. and Bergström R.: Transboundary acidification, eutrophication
59
and ground level ozone in Europe in 2005. EMEP Status Report 2005. EMEP Report
1/2005. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West, Oslo, Norway.
[15] Tarrason L., Fagerli H., Klein H., Simpson D., Benedictow A.C., Vestreng V., Rigler
E., Emberson L., Posch P. and Spranger T.: Transboundary acidification, eutrophication
and ground level ozone in Europe since 1990 to 2004. EMEP Status Report 2006. EMEP
Report 1/2006. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West, Oslo, Norway.
[16] Tarrason L., Fagerli H., Hjellbrekke A.G., Jonson J.E., Klein H., von Loon M., Posh
M., Simpson D. and Aas W.: Transboundary acidification Eutrophication and ground
level ozone in Europe in 2005. EMEP Status Report 2007. EMEP Report 1/2007.
Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West, Oslo, Norway.
[17] Bjørge D. and Skålin R.: PARLAM - the parallel HIRLAM version at DNMI, Research
Report No. 27, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway 1995.
[18] Fagerli H., Simpson D. and Aas W.: Model performance for sulphur and nitrogen
compounds for the period 1980 to 2000. [In:] L. Tarras´on, (editor), Transboundary
Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe. EMEP Status Report
1/2003, Part II Unified EMEP Model Performance, pages 1-66. The Norwegian
Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, 2003.
[19] Fagerli H., Jonson J. E., Wind P. and Tarras´on L.: Air concentrations and
depositions: Status 2000 and 2001. [In:] L. Tarras´on, (editor), Transboundary
Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe. EMEP Status Report
1/2003, Part III Source-Receptor Relationships, pages 7-19. The Norwegian
Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, 2003.
[20] Fagerli H.: Air concentrations and deposition of acidifying and eutrophying
components, status 2002. EMEP Report 1/2004, Transboundary acidification,
eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe. Status Report 1/2004, pages 77-103.
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, 2004.
[21] Fagerli H.: Acidifying and eutrophying components, status in 2003. [In:]
Transboundary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe. EMEP
Status Report 1/2005, pages 9-30. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway,
2005.
[22] Fagerli H., Spranger T. and Posch M.: Acidification and eutrophication - progress
towards the Gothenburg target year (2010). [In:] Transboundary Acidification,
Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe. EMEP Status Report 1/2006, pages
29-53. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, 2006.
[23] Fagerli H. and Hjellbrekke A. G.: Acidification and eutrophication, status in 2005.
[In:] Transboundary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe.
EMEP Status Report 1/2007, pages 33–53. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo,
Norway, 2007.
[24] Simpson D., Butterbach-Bahl K., Fagerli H., Kesik M. and Skiba U.: Deposition and
Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen over European Forests: A Modelling Study. Atmos.
Environ., 2006, 40(29), 5712-5726.
60
[25] Simpson D., Fagerli H., Hellsten S., Knulst K. and Westling O.: Comparison of
modelled and monitored deposition fluxes of sulphur and nitrogen to ICP-forest sites in
Europe. Biogeosciences, 2006, 337-355.
[26] Fagerli H. and Aas W.: Trends of nitrogen in air and precipitation: Model results and
observations at EMEP sites in Europe, 1980-2003. Environ. Pollut., 2008. In press,
doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.01.024.
[27] Endresen Ø., Sørgård E., Sundet J.K., Dalsøren S.B., Isaksen I.S.A., Berglen T.F.
and Gravir G.: Emission from international sea transport and environmental impact. J.
Geophys. Res., 2003, 108(3), 45-60.
[28] EEB. The European Environmental Bureau (EEB), The European Federation for
Transport and Environment (T\&E), Seas at Risk (SAR) and The Swedish NGO
Secretariat on Acid Rain: A briefieng document by The European Environmental Bureau
(EEB), The European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), Seas at Risk
(SAR) and The Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain (2003). Available on
www.eeb.org/activities/air/ship-briefing-nov04-(1).pdf
[29] Bartnicki J. and Van Loon M.: Estimation of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the
Baltic Sea in 2010 based on agreed emission ceilings under the EU NEC Directive and
the Gothenburg Protocol. Met. note No. 26, 2005. The Norwegian Meteorological
Institute, Oslo, Norway.
[30] Tarrason L. and Á. Nyίri (2008) Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and
ground level ozone in Europe in 2006. Status Report 1/2008. The Norwegian
Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, 2006.
61
Appendix A: List of files with the EMEP products
In this Appendix we present the alphabetic list of files available on the EMEP web site
together with their content. The content is also included in the beginning of each file on the
web.
File name on the web
BAS_dep_1997-2003.txt
BAS_dep_2000-2006.txt
BSAP_ox_1997-2003.txt
BSAP_ox_2000-2006.txt
BSAP_rd_1997-2003.txt
BSAP_rd_2000-2006.txt
BSAP_tot_1997-2003.txt
BSAP_tot_2000-2006.txt
grid_ox_dep-1977.txt
grid_ox_dep-1978.txt
grid_ox_dep-1979.txt
grid_ox_dep-2000.txt
grid_ox_dep-2001.txt
Product and description
Table with oxidized, reduced and total
nitrogen depositions to the Baltic Sea for
each year of the period 1997-2003.Units: kt
N per year.
Table with oxidized, reduced and total
nitrogen depositions to the Baltic Sea for
each year of the period 2000-2006.Units: kt
N per year.
Table with oxidized nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
1997-2003 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Table with oxidised nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
2000-2006 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Table with reduced nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
1997-2003 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Table with reduced nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
2000-2006 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Table with total nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
1997-2003 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Table with total nitrogen depositions to
BSAP sub-basins for each year of the period
2000-2006 and average over this period.
Units: kt N per year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 1997. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 1998. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 1999. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2000. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2001. EMEP model co-ordinates
62
grid_ox_dep-2002.txt
grid_ox_dep-2003.txt
grid_ox_dep-2004.txt
grid_ox_dep-2005.txt
grid_ox_dep-2006.txt
grid_ox_dep_av-1977-2003.txt
grid_ox_dep_av-2000-2006.txt
grid_rd_dep-1977.txt
grid_rd_dep-1978.txt
grid_rd_dep-1979.txt
grid_rd_dep-2000.txt
grid_rd_dep-2001.txt
grid_rd_dep-2002.txt
grid_rd_dep-2003.txt
grid_rd_dep-2004.txt
grid_rd_dep-2005.txt
grid_rd_dep-2006.txt
grid_rd_dep_av-1977-2003.txt
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2002. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2003. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2004. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2005. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual oxidised nitrogen depositions
in the year 2006. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded average annual oxidised nitrogen
depositions for the period 1997-2003. EMEP
model co-ordinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Gridded average annual oxidised nitrogen
depositions for the period 2000-2006. EMEP
model co-ordinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 1997. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 1998. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 1999. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2000. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2001. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2002. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2003. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2004. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2005. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual reduced nitrogen depositions
in the year 2006. EMEP model co-ordinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded average annual reduced nitrogen
depositions for the period 1997-2003. EMEP
63
grid_rd_dep_av-2000-2006.txt
grid_tot_dep-1977.txt
grid_tot_dep-1978.txt
grid_tot_dep-1979.txt
grid_tot_dep-2000.txt
grid_tot_dep-2001.txt
grid_tot_dep-2002.txt
grid_tot_dep-2003.txt
grid_tot_dep-2004.txt
grid_tot_dep-2005.txt
grid_tot_dep-2006.txt
grid_tot_dep_av-19772003.txt
grid_tot_dep_av-20002006.txt
src_nox_BA_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_BA_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_DE_1977-2003.ascii
model co-ordinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Gridded average annual reduced nitrogen
depositions for the period 2000-2006. EMEP
model co-ordinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 1997. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 1998. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 1999. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2000. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2001. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2002. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2003. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2004. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2005. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded annual total nitrogen depositions in
the year 2006. EMEP model co-ototinates
Units: mg N per m2 and year.
Gridded average annual total nitrogen
depositions for the period 1997-2003. EMEP
model co-ototinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Gridded average annual total nitrogen
depositions for the period 2000-2006. EMEP
model co-ototinates Units: mg N per m2 and
year.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: BA. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: BA. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
64
src_nox_DE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_DK_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_DK_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_EE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_EE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_FI_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_FI_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_LT_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_LT_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_LV_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_LV_2000-2006.ascii
source: DE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: DE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: DK. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: DK. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: EE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: EE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: FI. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: FI. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: LT. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: LT. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: LV. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: LV. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
65
src_nox_PL_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_PL_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_RE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_RE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_RU_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_RU_2000-2006.ascii
src_nox_SE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nox_SE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_BA_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_BA_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_DE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_DE_2000-2006.ascii
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: PL. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: PL. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: RE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: RE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: RU. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: RU. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: SE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of oxidised nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: SE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: BA. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: BA. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: DE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: DE. EMEP model grid:
66
src_nrd_DK_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_DK_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_EE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_EE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_FI_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_FI_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_LT_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_LT_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_LV_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_LV_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_PL_1977-2003.ascii
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: DK. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: DK. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: EE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: EE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: FI. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: FI. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: LT. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: LT. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: LV. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: LV. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: PL. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
67
src_nrd_PL_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_RE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_RE_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_RU_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_RU_2000-2006.ascii
src_nrd_SE_1977-2003.ascii
src_nrd_SE_2000-2006.ascii
src_tab_oxn_1977-2003.txt
src_tab_oxn_2000-2006.txt
src_tab_rdn_1977-2003.txt
src_tab_rdn_2000-2006.txt
src_tab_tot_1977-2003.txt
src_tab_tot_2000-2006.txt
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: PL. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: RE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: RE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: RU. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: RU. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 1997-2003 emitted from the
source: SE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Average deposition of reduced nitrogen in
the period 2000-2006 emitted from the
source: SE. EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of oxidised nitrogen to subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 1997
- 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of oxidised nitrogen to subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 2000
- 2006. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of reduced nitrogen to subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 1997
- 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of reduced nitrogen to subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 2000
- 2006. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of total nitrogen to subbasins of the Baltic Sea in the period 1997
- 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of selected emission sources to
the deposition of total nitrogen to sub-
68
srs_nox_DE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_DE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_DE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_DE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_DE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_DE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_DK_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_DK_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_DK_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_DK_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_DK_S3_2000.ascii
basins of the Baltic Sea in the period 2000
- 2006. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DK to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DK to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DK to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DK to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DK to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
69
srs_nox_DK_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_EE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_FI_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_FI_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_FI_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_FI_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_FI_S3_2000.ascii
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DK to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: EE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: EE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: EE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: EE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: EE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: EE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: FI to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: FI to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: FI to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: FI to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: FI to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
70
srs_nox_FI_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LT_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_LV_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LV_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_LV_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LV_S2_2003.ascii
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: FI to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LT to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LT to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LT to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LT to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LT to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LT to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LV to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LV to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LV to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LV to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
71
srs_nox_LV_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_LV_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_PL_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_RE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_RE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RE_S2_2003.ascii
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LV to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LV to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: PL to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: PL to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: PL to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: PL to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: PL to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: PL to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RE deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: REo deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RE deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
72
srs_nox_RE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_RU_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nox_SE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nox_SE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nox_SE_S2_2000.ascii
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RU deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RU deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RU deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RU to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RU to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RU to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: SE deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: SE deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: SE deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
73
srs_nox_SE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nox_SE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nox_SE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_DE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DK_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_DK_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DK_S2_2000.ascii
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: SE to deposition of
oxidised nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP
model grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j,
value. Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: SE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: SE to deposition of oxidised
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DE to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DE to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DK to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: DK to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DK to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
74
srs_nrd_DK_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_DK_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_DK_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_EE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_FI_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_FI_S1_2003.ascii
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: DK to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DK to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: DK to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: EE to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: EE to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: EE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: EE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: EE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: EE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: FI to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: FI to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
75
srs_nrd_FI_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_FI_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_FI_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_FI_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LT_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_LV_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LV_S1_2003.ascii
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: FI to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: FI to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: FI to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: FI to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LT to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LT to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LT to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LT to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LT to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LT to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LV to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: LV to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
76
srs_nrd_LV_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LV_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_LV_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_LV_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_PL_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RE_S1_2000.ascii
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LV to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: LV to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LV to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: LV to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: PL to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: PL to deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: PL to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: PL to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: PL to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: PL to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RE deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
77
srs_nrd_RE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_RE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_RE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S1_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_RU_S3_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_SE_S1_2000.ascii
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: REo deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RE deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RU deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: RU deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RU deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: RU to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RU to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: RU to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: SE deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model
78
srs_nrd_SE_S1_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_SE_S2_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_SE_S2_2003.ascii
srs_nrd_SE_S3_2000.ascii
srs_nrd_SE_S3_2003.ascii
srs_tab_oxn_S1_2000.txt
srs_tab_oxn_S1_2003.txt
srs_tab_oxn_S2_2000.txt
srs_tab_oxn_S2_2003.txt
srs_tab_oxn_S3_2000.txt
srs_tab_oxn_S3_2003.txt
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 1, 2
and 3 from the source: SE deposition of
reduced nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model
grid: i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value.
Units: mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: SE deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sectors 7 and 8
from the source: SE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: SE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2000 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emissions in sector 10 from
the source: SE to deposition of reduced
nitrogen in the year 2003 EMEP model grid:
i=1,170,j=1,133. Format: i,j, value. Units:
mg N/m2.
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N /
year.
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N /
year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N /
year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N /
year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N /
year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of
oxidised nitrogen to sub-basins of the
Baltic Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N /
year.
79
srs_tab_rdn_S1_2000.txt
srs_tab_rdn_S1_2003.txt
srs_tab_rdn_S2_2000.txt
srs_tab_rdn_S2_2003.txt
srs_tab_rdn_S3_2000.txt
srs_tab_rdn_S3_2003.txt
srs_tab_tot_S1_2000.txt
srs_tab_tot_S1_2003.txt
srs_tab_tot_S2_2000.txt
srs_tab_tot_S2_2003.txt
srs_tab_tot_S3_2000.txt
srs_tab_tot_S3_2003.txt
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
reduced nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
reduced nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
reduced nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
reduced nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in
the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of reduced
nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in
the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
total nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 1, 2 and 3
in the selected source to the deposition of
total nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
total nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sectors 7 and 8 in
the selected source to the deposition of
total nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic
Sea in the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of total
nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in
the year 2000. Units: kt N / year.
Contribution of emission sector 10 in the
selected source to the deposition of total
nitrogen to sub-basins of the Baltic Sea in
the year 2003. Units: kt N / year.
80