Self-Diffusion of Sodium, Chloride and Iodide Ions in Acetonitrile-Water Mixtures E. H aw licka Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Technical University, Lodz, Poland Z. Naturforsch. 42a, 1014-1016 (1987); received June 22, 1987 The self-diffusion coefficient of sodium, chloride and iodide ions in acetonitrile-water mixtures at 25.0 ± 0.05 °C has been measured in dependence on the salt m olarity in the range 1.0-10-4 1.0-10 m ol/dm 3. The ionic self-diffusion coefficients in infinitely diluted solutions have been computed. The influence of the solvent composition on the solvation of the ions is discussed. Preferential solvation of the ions by acetonitrile above 15m ol% of acetonitrile has been found. An effect o f the sodium ions on the form ation of acetonitrile globules is postulated. The relation between the structure o f a solvent and the solvation o f solutes is a fundam ental q ues tion in solu tion chem istry. A acetonitrile-w ater m ixtures as solvents seem to be suitable system s to study that problem because they exhibit tw o struc tural discontinuities. From the viscosity and density investigations M oreau and Douheret [1, 2] have postulated the existence o f three fundam ental structural regions: U p to 15m ol% o f acetonitrile the water structure remains unchanged and the acetonitrile m olecules occupy cavities in that struc ture. A b o v e that concentration the water structure is disrupted and a segregation o f water and acetonitrile m olecules occurs, the m ixture exhibit ing phase segregation at a critical com p osition o f about 38 m ol% C H 3CN [3] and with an upper critical tem perature o f about 272 K [ 3 - 5 ] . In the acetonitrile rich solution (above 75 mol^o C H 3 C N ) the water m olecules accom m odate in the structure o f pure acetonitrile. Studies o f the proton chem ical shift [6 ] and self-d iffu sion [7, 8 ] have confirm ed those structural regions. The aim o f the present work was to determ ine the self-d iffu sion coefficients o f sodium , chlorine and iodine ions in acetonitrile-w ater mixture and to study the ion-solvent interactions. distilled over P 2 O 5 , and double distilled, degassed water were used to prepare the solu tion s. 2 2 N a, 3 6 C1 and 125I were used as radioactive tracers. The radioactivities o f the sam ples were measured in toluene-ethan ol so lu tio n o f 2,5-d iph en yloxazole (P P O ) with a liquid scintillation counter. For the self-d iffu sio n m easurem ents the openend capillary m ethod was applied. The details o f the experim ental procedure have been described in [9]. R esults The self-d iffu sio n experim ents were carried out at 2 5 .0 ± 0 .0 1 °C . T he m easurem ents have covered the w hole com p o sitio n range o f the solvent. The m olarity o f the salts w as varied between 1 . 0 • 1 0 and 1.0 • 1 0 ' 2. A ll D -values have been calculated from 9 independent experim ents. The statistical er ror o f the D -value is less than 1 %. A s it was derived previously [10], the depen dence o f the ionic self-d iffu sion coefficient on the salt m olarity m can be expressed in form: (1) Experim ental N aC l (suprapur, Merck), N al (suprapur, M erck), acetonitrile (spectroscopy grade, M erck), Reprint requests to Dr. E. Hawlicka, Institute of Applied Radia tion Chemistry, Technical University, Wroblewskiego 15, P-93-590 Lodz, Poland. 0932-0784 / 87 / 0900-1014 $ 01.30/0. - w here T, £ 0 and D°° denote the tem perature, the static dielectric constant o f the solvent and the ionic self-d iffu sio n coefficient in the infinitely diluted solu tion (lim iting self-d iffu sion co e ffi cient), respectively, and B , = D ° ° / D f , where D°° and D f relate to the ion under study and the cou n terion, respectively. Please order a reprint rather than m aking your own copy. Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 5:09 AM 1015 E. Hawlicka • Self-D iffusion o f Sodium , Chlorine and Iodine Ions Table 1. The limiting self-diffusion coefficients o f sodium , D Ncf chloride and iodide ions in acetonitrile-water mixtures. XAN is om2s-i the mole fraction of acetonitrile in the solvent. The static dielec tric constants of the solvent were taken from [11]. -^AN ^N a+ ' 105 c m 's - 1 Nal NaCl 0.000 0.103 0.147 0.256 0.408 0.508 0.579 0.733 0.805 0.912 1.000 1.333 1.18 1.15 1.09 1.10 1.26 1.40 1.67 1.79 1.91 2.05 • 105 cm2 s " 1 1.333 1.18 1.16 1.09 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.92 2.06 2.060 1.60 1.54 1.58 1.71 1.77 1.89 2.15 2.30 2.48 2.70 D ” • 105 2 -t cm s 2.090 1.65 1.60 1.64 1.78 1.86 1.96 2.19 2.35 2.53 2.72 Fig. 1. The dependence of the limiting self-diffusion coefficients D Na + (a), DC\- (b) and D \- (c) on A"an at 2 5 °C. T o calculate D°° and D°° from (1) a com puter program was written to m inim ize sim ultaneously the tw o mean square deviations <7/ = l / l l Di (cal) - D , (exp)]' (2 ) for / = cation and / = anion. The com puted Z)-values are sum m arized in Table 1. A s it was expected, the sam e lim iting self d iffu sion coefficients o f sod ium ions resulted from the experim ents with N aC l and N a l. The influence o f the solvent com p osition on the lim iting self d iffu sion coefficients o f the ions is presented in Figure 1. As it can be seen, all fun ction s are sim ilar and pass through a m inim um . The sm allest values o f D q \ - and D are observed at x AU = 0 .1 5 , and that o f £>Na+ at x AN = 0.36. A s com pared with G ill’s original equation, in the first term o f (3), resulting from the viscous fric tion forces, perfect slipping is assum ed for the solvated ion-solvent boundary con d itions [10, 13]. Based on the data given in Table 1 the ionic radii have been calculated from (3). The results are presented in Figure 2. For all studied ions the de pendence o f the r,-values on x AN is non-linear and exhibits a positive deviation from linearity, which m ight indicate a preferential solvation o f ions by acetonitrile m olecules. This con clusion disagrees with a weak preferential hydration o f halide ions postulated from nmr studies [14] and with a prefer ential hydration o f sodium ions concluded from upper critical tem perature changes [3], free energy o f transfer between water and w ater-acetonitrile D iscussion In order to investigate an influence o f the solvent com p osition on ion ic solvation one can com pute ionic radii. A s it has been show n previ ously [10], G ill’s m odification [12] o f S to k es’ law seem s to be m ore accurate then the sim ple Einstein-Stokes approach to calculate ion ic radii because both viscous and dielectric friction forces are taken into account. G ill’s equation, applied to self-d iffu sion coefficients instead o f the ionic con ductance, can be rewritten as r, = kT ■+ 0.0103 £q , 4nnoD ? where r]0 denotes the viscosity o f the solvent. (3) icrO-O—oJo-o-< QO 0.5 x AN 1.0 Fig. 2. Ionic radii calculated from (3). (The viscosity of the acetonitrile-water mixture was taken from [1]). The vertical lines mark the structural regions: I: water like structure, II: microphase coexistence, III: acetonitrile like structure. Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 5:09 AM 1016 E. Hawlicka • Self-D iffusion o f Sodium , Chlorine and Iodine Ions m ixture [15] and nmr studies [16]. Experim ental Bviscosity coefficien ts o f alkali metal halides in acetonitrile-w ater solu tions [17] suggest, however, that preferential solvation by acetonitrile occurs. A s it can be seen from Fig. 2, in the regions I and III, i.e. below 1 5m ol% C H 3C N and above 75 m ol% C H 3 C N , the radii o f the ions are the sam e as in the pure solvents. One can suppose that the presence o f the cosolven t, acetonitrile and water, respectively, does not disturb the form ation o f the sam e solvation shell as in the pure solvent. This confirm s also the previous conclusion [6 , 7] that acetonitrile, w hile m ethanol [ 1 8 - 2 0 ] does, does not change the water structure. In the region o f m icrophase coexistence (0.15 < x AN < 0.75) the interactions between the solvent m olecules and sodium ions differ from those with the anions. In this range a linear in crease o f the radii o f both anions is observed, whereas the radius o f the sodium ions reaches its upper values, the sam e as in pure acetonitrile, already at x AN = 0.38. The difference can be ex plained as follow s: O ne can suppose that the critical com p osition (38 m ol% C H 3 CN) divides the m icroheterogenous region into two sections. Below that point the structure is form ed by water globules and acetonitrile m olecules a n d /o r globules are dis tributed between them , whereas above that point the acetonitrile globules form the structure. A lso in [6 , 7] it was postulated that the structure o f the water glob ules is m ore ordered than that o f pure water. If the disagreem ent betw een the spherical structure o f the hydrated cation and the structure o f the water globules is great, then sodium ions cannot from hydration shells and are rem oved from the w ater globules. The bare sodium ions cannot exist and are “ fo rced ” to create a solvation shell con taining acetonitrile m olecules. A t the critical co m p o sitio n the concentration o f aceto nitrile is great enough to form the sam e solvation shell as in pure acetonitrile. In such a case on e can su ppose that the presence o f the sodium ions in duces the form ation o f the acetonitrile globules, because the cation-w ater interactions are weaker then w ater-w ater ones. T his “ arranging e ffe c t” o f sodium ions might explain the increase o f the upper critical tem pera ture observed in the presence o f sodium nitrate [5]. T he interactions o f the an ions with the solvent, both w ater and acetonitrile, are weaker them those o f sod ium ions. T herefore the anions do not induce the form ation o f acetonitrile glob ules, as can be seen from the linear dependence o f the re values on jcan in the m icroheterogenous region. It w as foun d previously [21] that, if a preferen tial so lvation occurs, the self-d iffu sio n o f the com p onent form ing the solvation shell is strongly a f fected by the presence o f electrolyte. In order to con firm the concluded preferential solvation o f ions by acetonitrile, studies o f the self-d iffu sion o f both co m p on en ts o f the solvent in the presence o f electrolytes are under way. [1] C. M oreau and G. Douheret, Thermochim. Acta 13, 385 (1975). [2] C. M oreau and G. Douheret, J. Chem. Therm odyn. 8, 403 (1976). [3] G. Schneider, Z. physik. Chem. N.F. 41, 327 (1964). [4] M. Ewert, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belgique 46, 327 (1937). [5] M. Moolel and H. Schneider, Z. physik. Chem. N.F. 74, 327 (1971). [6] A. J. Easteal, Aust. J. Chem. 32, 1379 (1979). [7] A. J. Easteal, Aust. J. Chem. 33, 1667 (1980). [8] H. G. Hertz and H. Leiter, Z. physik. Chem. N. F. 1 3 3 , 45 (1983). [9] E. Hawlicka, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 8 7 , 425 (1983). [10] E. Hawlicka, Z. N aturforsch. 41a, 939 (1986). [11] A. D’A prano and R. Fuoss, J. Phys. Chem. 73, 400 (1969). [12] D. S. Gill, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday 1 81, 687 (1985). [13] A. A. Ravel and A. B. Porai-Kosic, Teor. Exp. Khim. 6, 311 (1970). [14] T. R. Stengle, Y. C. E. Pan, and C. H. Langford, J. Am er. Chem. Soc. 94, 9037 (1972). [15] B. G. Cox and R. N atarajan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 75, 86 (1979). [16] E. G. Bloor and R. G. Kidd, Can. J. Chem. 46, 3425 (1968). [17] G. Kum ar, N. C. Dey, B. K. Saikia, and I. Hagne, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 59, 1555 (1986). [18] F. Franks and D. J. G. Ives, Q uart. Rev. 20, 1 (1966). [19] D. Feakins, D. J. Freemantle, and K. G. Lawrance, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Com m un. 1968, 970. [20] D. Feakins, D. J. Freemantle, and K. G. Lawrance, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 70, 795 (1974). [21] E. Hawlicka, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 87,425 (1983). Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 5:09 AM
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz