Single Molecule Detection in Solution. Edited by Christoph Zander, JoÈrg Enderlein, Richard A. Keller Copyright c 2002 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA ISBNs: 3-527-40310-8 (Hardback); 3-527-60080-9 (Electronic) 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes J. Wrachtrup, T. J. Aartsma, J. KoÈhler, M. Ketelaars, A. M. van Oijen, M. Matsushita, J. Schmidt, C. Tietz and F. Jelezko 6.1 Introduction Nature provides many examples of highly organized systems in which finely tuned intermolecular interactions govern complex chains of events, where each link in the chain is of vital importance for the living organisms. Detailed structural information of these systems is becoming available at an ever increasing rate. In many cases these structures are designed to facilitate ingenious, efficient and effective mechanistic steps which are often intimately related to fundamental concepts of physics. One of the current challenges is to discover how the basic principles of physics govern life processes. The foremost example of a biological process which builds on fundamental physical concepts is the process of photosynthesis which sustains all life on earth. Photosynthesis is carried out by many different organisms, i. e., plants, algae and photosynthetic bacteria which all have developed highly efficient and optimized systems to collect the light of the sun and to use the light energy as the driving force for their metabolic reactions. Photosynthesis requires synergism in the interaction between tens of different proteins. The structure of many of these proteins has been solved or will be solved in the near future. This structural information provides a strong basis for detailed studies of structure function relationships of these proteins. The photosynthetic light reactions basically consist of four primary steps: 1. absorption of (sun)light by a pigment, 2. ultrafast transfer of the excitation energy to a `photoactive' pigment, 3. oxidation of this excited photoactive pigment, and 4. stabilization of the charge-separated state by secondary electron-transfer reactions. The protein pigment complexes involved in the first two processes are often called antenna or light-harvesting (LH) complexes. These complexes permit the organism to increase its absorption cross-section for sunlight significantly. The primary electron transfer steps (processes 3 and 4) usually occur in a special protein pigment complex which is referred to as the reaction center (RC). 185 186 6.1 Introduction All photosynthetic light reactions take place in specialized proteins, which bind the pigment and/or electron transfer cofactors at optimized binding sites and thus ensure the high efficiency of the photosynthetic light reactions in the various organisms. The function of photosynthetic protein pigment complexes is determined not only by the intrinsic properties of the pigments involved, but also to a large extent by the intermolecular interactions between those pigments [1,2]: the interactions between the chromophores are directly responsible for the primary processes of energy transfer and charge separation. These interactions depend strongly on relative orientations and distances, and specific protein pigment interactions may also play a role. In `primitive' photosynthetic organisms, such as the well-studied photosynthetic purple bacteria, the light reactions are carried out by only 5 7 different types of proteins, whereas in green plants more than 50 types of proteins are involved in two different light reactions, carried out by the so-called photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII). This large number of proteins reflects the complexity of the organism, and is needed for efficient photosynthesis under a wide variety of different environmental conditions. 6.1.1 Bacterial Photosynthesis Photosynthetic bacteria show a more simplified structure of the antenna and core complexes than green plants. For example, in most purple bacteria, the photosynthetic unit (PSU) present in the membrane contains, besides the RC, only two types of antenna complexes, i. e., light-harvesting complex 1 (LH1) and light-harvesting complex 2 (LH2). LH1 is known to form a ring-like structure which encloses the RC [3, 4], whereas LH2 is not in direct contact with the RC, but transfers the energy to the RC via the LH1 complex [5, 6]. Figure 6.1 shows a model of the bacterial PSU of the purple bacteria Rb. sphaeroides where the organization of the different protein pigment complexes is depicted. Figure 6.2 shows the low-temperature absorption spectrum of membrane fragments of the purple bacterium Rhodopseudomonas (Rps.) acidophila. In the nearinfrared it shows broad bands at 800 and 870 nm and a small band at 910 nm. The first two bands are assigned to the LH2 antenna, whereas the third band is assigned to the LH1 antenna. Since the LH2 complex absorbs at shorter wavelengths, the light-harvesting system functions as an energy funnel towards the RC. This transfer of energy from LH2 to LH1 and subsequently to the RC occurs in vivo on a timescale of 5 to 50 ps [1], very fast compared to the excited state decay of isolated LH2 complexes, which corresponds to a lifetime of about 1 ns. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes Figure 6.1. Model for the photosynthetic unit (PSU) of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The PSU consist of two types of protein pigment complexes: the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) and the light-harvesting complexes (LH). The main function of the light-harvesting complexes is to gather light energy and to transfer this energy to the reaction centers for the photo-induced redox processes. In most purple bacteria, the photosynthetic membranes contain two types of lightharvesting complexes: light-harvesting complex 1 (LH1) and light-harvesting complex 2 (LH2). While LH1 is tightly bound to the RC, LH2 is not directly associated with it, but transfers energy to the RC via LH1. Figure reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. 1 absorbance (A.U.) LH2 LH1 0 750 800 850 900 950 wavelength (nm) Figure 6.2. Absorption spectrum of a solution of membrane fragments of Rps. acidophila. The membrane fragments were diluted in a standard LH2 buffer in the presence of 67 % glycerol. The spectrum was taken at 10 K. 187 188 6.1 Introduction The light-harvesting complex II The LH2 complex is a peripheral antenna complex which serves to absorb light and transfer the excited state energy to the LH1 RC complex. The high-resolution X-ray structure of the LH2 complex [7], and the lower resolution structural information for LH1 [4], show a remarkable symmetry in the arrangement of the light-absorbing pigments in their protein matrix. The basic building block of LH2 is a protein heterodimer (ab), which binds three BChl a pigments and one carotenoid molecule. The LH2 complex of Rps. acidophila consists of nine such ab polypeptide heterodimers. The 3-dimensional structure is depicted in Fig. 6.3a, where the upper part of the figure shows the pigment protein complex as a whole while the lower part shows only the BChl a pigments for clarity. A very pronounced feature of the complex is that, at least in the crystalline form, it has a C9, nine-fold rotational symmetry [7]. Two BChl a pigment pools can be distinguished and are labeled B800 and B850, according to their room-temperature absorption maxima in the near-infrared. The B800 ring consists of nine pigments, which have their molecular plane perpendicular to the symmetry axis. The B850 ring consists of nine repeating pairs of a- and b-bound pigments, which are tightly organized as the blades of a turbine with their molecular planes parallel to the symmetry axis. Upon excitation, energy is transferred from the B800 to B850 pigments in 1 to 2 ps [8 12], while energy transfer among the B850 molecules is an order of magnitude faster [13 15]. Much information about the intermolecular interactions can be obtained from the electronic structure and excited-state dynamics of the pigment-molecules in isolated antenna complexes. For this reason, all forms of optical spectroscopy are very highly instrumental in elucidating the electronic structure and the dynamics of the optically excited states. Nevertheless, even isolated protein pigment complexes of photosynthetic systems are rather complex, and it has proven difficult to analyze the excited state properties of these systems in detail. This is mainly caused by the pronounced disorder in these types of systems, which masks details in the steady-state optical spectra, even at low temperature (Fig.6.3b). To eliminate this complication, we have successfully applied the technique of single-molecule spectroscopy to study the absorption spectrum of LH2. We were able to resolve details which are not visible in the bulk spectra, and the results offer a new view on the electronic structure of LH2 [16 21]. Here we review the progress that has been made in this work. It is shown that the LH2 complex is an ideal model system for studying the basic principles of exciton interactions in the strong and weak coupling limit, and how they affect the observed optical spectra. 6.1.1.1 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes a y z x x 10 Å absorbance (A.U.) b 780 800 Figure 6.3. (a) Structure of the LH2 complex from Rps. acidophila as determined with X-ray diffraction [7]. The left part of the figure displays a top view of the assembly and the right part a side view. The upper part shows the whole protein pigment complex, the lower part only the BChl a pigments. The pigments are 820 840 860 wavelength (nm) 880 arranged in two concentric rings commonly termed B800 (yellow) and B850 (red). (b) Fluorescence-detected absorption spectrum of an ensemble of LH2 complexes at 1.2 K. The spectrum was measured at 20 W cm 2 with LH2 dissolved in polyvenyl alcohol (PVA)-buffer solution and spin-coated on a LiF substrate. 189 190 6.1 Introduction 6.1.2 The Photosynthetic Unit of Green Plants Higher plants and algae, in contrast to purple bacteria, generate oxygen. To do this they utilize two photosystems, termed PSI and PSII. Both PSII and PSI contain, among others, two chlorophyll A molecules, and both undergo light-driven transport of an electron across the thylakoid membrane. These chlorophylls in the two reaction centers differ in their light-absorption maxima (680 nm for PSII, 700 nm for PSI) because of differences in the protein environments, and thus the reactioncenter chlorophylls are often denoted P680 and P700. More importantly, the two photosystems differ significantly in their functions see Fig. 6.4. PSII splits water: the absorption of a photon causes an electron to move from P680 to an acceptor quinone on the stromal surface, and the resultant positive charge on the P680 strips electrons from the highly unwilling donor H2O, forming O2 and protons that remain in the thylakoid lumen and form part of the proton motive force. The electrons in the acceptor quinone move via a series of carriers, to the electron-donor site on the luminal surface of the PSI; during this process additional protons are transported into the thylacoid lumen. PSI uses the energy of an absorbed photon to transfer the electron to ferridoxin, an Fe S-containing acceptor protein on the stromal surface. From there, electrons are passed to the ultimate acceptor, NADP, forming NADPH. Associated with both PSI and PSII are light-harvesting complexes that absorb light and transfer the absorbed energy to the reaction center chlorophylls. Figure 6.4. Simplified functional organization of the protein complexes involved in energy, electron and proton transfer in oxygenic photosynthesis. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes Photosystem II and light-harvesting complex II The PSII complex consists of approximately 25 different proteins, referred to as PsbA-W or Lhcb1-6, according to the genes that encode them. More than 20 of these are integral membrane proteins, with an estimated total of about 50 transmembrane helices. At the heart of this multisubunit complex is the PSII reaction center composed of D1 and D2 proteins. These two proteins bind the aforementioned cofactors that are involved in the light-driven primary and secondary electron transfer processes. Upon illumination P680 is initially excited to its first singlet state where it rapidly donates the energized electron to a pheophytin (Phe) molecule to form the radical pair state P680Phe . Phe then passes an electon to a bound plastoquinone molecule (QA) within 200 ps, while P680 is reduced in nanoseconds by a redox-active tyrosine. Within milliseconds QA reduces a second plastoquinone, QB, and the tyrosine is reduced by a four-atom manganese oxide cluster located on the lumenal surface of the PSII complex. This manganese cluster is positioned at the center of the oxygen evolving complex of PSII. Surrounding the D1 and D2 reaction center proteins are the other PSII subunits. These include the chlorophyll-a-binding proteins, CP43, CP47 internal antenna, cytochrome b559 and the minor subunits, form the PSII core complex. In higher plants and green algae, an additional outer light-harvesting system is composed of proteins that bind both chlorophyll A and B. These proteins make up the majority of the light-harvesting system and are known as LHCII. LHCII is organized as a trimer and its structure has been solved to 3.4 AÊ. The other chlorophyll A/B binding proteins, Lhc4,5 and 6, also known as CP29,CP26 and CP24, respectively, bind less chlorophyll B than LHCII and are thought to exist as monomers. They seem to function as a conduit for the transfer of excitation energy form the LHCII trimers to the reaction center via CP47 and CP43. The remaining proteins either serve as chlorophyll carriers (PsbS) or may protect the reaction center from photodamage (PsbE and F) or have masses less than 10 kDa with unknown function. Although a high-resolution structure of PSII has not yet been determined, considerable progress towards this goal has been made recently by cryoelectron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals. LHCII is the most abundant protein in chloroplasts of green plants and green algae. It binds about 50 % of all chlorophyll in these organisms. The protein has a mass of 25 kDa and is isolated as a trimeric complex. The resolution achieved in cryoelectron microscopy is sufficient to determine the position of 80 % of the aminoacid residues, 12 chlorophyll and 2 carotenoid molecules [22]. Figure 6.5 shows an LHCII trimer in the top view. A monomeric subunit is made up of one protein spanning the membrane three times. A short a-helical piece is parallel to the membrane. The carotenoids (luteins) not shown in Fig. 6.5 are located in the center of the complex and also span the complex from the lumenal to the stromal side. Because of their central position the luteins are essential for the complex. A reconstruction of the complex without luteins is not possible. The carotenoids extend the absorption of the LHCII complex to the blue. However their major role most probably is to protect the chlorophylls against photochemical degradation. Currently the resolution of 6.1.2.1 191 192 6.1 Introduction Figure 6.5. Structure of LHC2 from electron microscopy [22]. structural data is not sufficient to distinguish between Chl A and Chl B molecules or to determine the orientation of the chlorophyll molecules in the plane. The attribution of Chl A and B molecules is thus based on phenomenological considerations. Because of fast energy transfer from Chl B to A, Chl A molecules are populated with the highest probability. They thus need to be protected against photodestruction more efficiently than Chl B molecules. Hence the seven Chl sites closest to the carotenoids have been attributed to Chl A. There is considerable discussion on this point in the literature. Recently, it has been proposed that one or two pairs of Chl A/B molecules may have to be exchanged. A variety of picosecond and femtosecund studies have been performed to explore the energy transfer dynamics in LHCII. The first available structure data led to a wealth of spectroscopic investigations to unravel the complicated interplay among the Chls in monomers and trimers of the complex [23 28]. The Qy-region of the bulk absorption spectrum of LHC-II is relatively unstructured showing two broad bands around 650 nm attributed to the absorption of Chl B and 675 nm attributed to Chl A. However, several room and low temperature techniques such as linear and circular dichroism,[29] or non-linear polarization spectroscopy in the frequency domain [30] reveal up to 11 spectral subbands within the Qy-absorption band. A satisfying interpretation of this sub-structure as a result of Chl protein and/or Chl Chl interaction is still missing. At low temperature (I 5 K) the energetically lowest band lies at 680.4 nm and hole burning reveals a line width of 0.037 cm 1 [27] for this transition. From femtosecond spectroscopy it is known that the Chl B Chl A energy transfer occurs within the monomeric subunit of LHC-II trimers [24]. This is consistent with the weak coupling between Chl molecules among different sub-units [31] 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes owing to the relatively large distance between the Chls in different monomers. The coupling strength between Chl molecules of different subunits is thought to be less than 5 cm 1 [27]. Photosystem I PSI is the most complex photosynthetic light-harvesting plus electron transfer system for which a structure is now available. The functional unit of the PSI core of Synechococuss elongatus consists of 11 subunits, including the two major subunits PsaA and PsaB, each having a molecular weight of around 80 kD with known sequence, and each binding roughly 100 chlorophyll A and 10 25 carotenoid molecules plus 3 FeS clusters. The structure has been resolved to 4 AÊ, and the position of 90 Chls have been determined. As in the case of LHCII no information about the direction of the transitions dipoles is available. The core of PSI contains 22 transmembrane helices which exhibit C2 symmetry. The electron transfer chain is embedded in a structure of 10 transmembrane helices with an arrangement close to that of the L and M subunits in the purple bacteria reaction center. All other 90 antenna Chl A molecules are dispersed in a band around this core and, for a large part, are associated with the remaining 6 transmembrane helices on each of the large subunits. A pair of chlorophylls located in the central area of the photosynthetic unit was assigned to the primary electron donor P700. The electronic transitions of all major Chl antenna molecules are at higher transition energies than those of P700 and form an absorption band around 680 nm (C680). However there are also a considerable number of chlorophyll molecules absorbing at wavelength longer than 680 nm. These chlorophylls are often referred to as the red pool. Different spectroscopic methods have been successfully applied to unravel the energy pathway in PSI aggregates. Time resolved absorption measurements indicate that the energy equilibration between the main C680 and the red pool of pigments takes place on a sub-picosecond timescale. Several models have been applied to describe energy trapping dynamics in PSI. A trap-limited model predicts that the overall kinetics in PSI is determined by the rate of charge separation in the reaction center part. An alternative mechanism was proposed by van Grondelle et al. [1] and several other authors. They claimed that energy trapping in the low-energy Chl pool is dominating in PSI kinetics (transfer-to-trap limited model). Under ambient conditions energy captured by low-energy Chls can be efficiently transferred to P700 via thermally populated vibrational levels. Recent results based on charge-transfer induced absorption changes show high efficiency of this process at physiological temperatures [32]. The photophysical properties of red-pool Chls have been subject to intense spectroscopic studies during the last few years (for a recent review see Ref. [33]). The amount of PSI low-energy pigments and their spectral forms depend on the type of photosynthetic unit. Deconvolution of Synechocystis mutant absorption spectra shows that the red pigments pool cannot be associated with peripheral protein subunits [34]. Recently reported absorption spectra of Synechococcus elongatus show that low-energy Chls may belong to the connecting domain of the monomeric PSI within the trimer [32]. It was estimated 6.1.2.2 193 194 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy that five Chls C708 and six chlorophylls C719 contribute to the absorption in this spectral region [35]. The spectral assignment of the red-most pigments is tentative because of the strong overlap of spectral bands [35]. For all the chlorophylls except two, the distance to any of the pigments in the electron transfer chain exceeds 1.6 nm, making energy transfer slow (10 20 ps). Two chlorophylls are found that seem to connect the antenna with the second and third pair of Chls of the electron transfer system, and it has been suggested that these form a special entry port for excitation energy. Trapping in PS1 is fast (20 25 ps) and charge separation is irreversible. Using fluorescence depolarization measurements it has been estimated that the major hopping process within PS1 occurs on a timescale of 100 fs. Equilibration between pool and very red chlorophyll molecules, absorbing between 720 and 730 nm, seems to occur on a timescale of a few ps. The process of energy transfer to P700 must occur at the same rate as this equilibration between core and red pigments. Even at very low temperatures where escape from the red states is impossible, a reasonably high quantum yield for charge separation is still observed. This has led to a model in which essentially all sites within the PS1 core are more or less equally efficient in transferring their energy to P700 which may be viewed as a 3D model version of the 2D model operating in purple bacteria. Absorption and fluorescence emission bands of long-wavelength pigments are strongly inhomogeneously broadened. Hole-burning spectroscopy has proven to be a powerful method for probing the electronic structure and photophysical properties of many photosynthetic complexes [36]. Hole-burning data provide evidence for strong electron phonon coupling in a reaction center containing photosynthetic units if compared to light-harvesting antenna (LH2, LHCII)[37]. 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy of Individual Light-Harvesting II Complexes of Rhodopseudomonas acidophila 6.2.1 Experimental Sample preparation The LH2 complexes were isolated from the membranes of the purple non-sulfur bacterium Rps. acidophila (strain 10050) as described elsewhere [38]. Hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (BDH; Mw125,000) was purified over a mixed resin in order to remove ionic impurities [39]. A polymer-LH2 solution was prepared by adding 1 % (wt/wt) purified PVA to a solution of 5x10 11 M LH2 in buffer (10 mM Tris, 0.1 % LDAO1), 1 mM EDTA2), pH 8.0). A drop of this solution was spin-coated onto a LiF substrate by spinning it for 15 s at 500 rpm and 60 s at 2000 rpm, producing a high quality film with a thickness of less than 1 mm. The sample was mounted in a liquid-helium bath cryostat and cooled to 1.2 K. 6.2.1.1 1) LDAO ± Lauryldimethylamine oxide 2) EDTA ± Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes Set-up The sample was excited at a wavelength of 800 nm by focusing the output of a continuous wave, tunable Ti-Sapphire laser (Spectra Physics 3900S) onto the sample through a simple planoconvex lens with large focal length (f 250 mm) which creates a 100 mm large spot on the polymer film (Fig. 6.6a, top). The fluorescence emitted by the LH2 complexes was collected by an objective consisting of an aspheric singlet lens (NA 0.55, working distance 850 mm) mounted in the cryostat close to the sample, and focused on a red-sensitive, back-illuminated CCD camera (Princeton Instruments, 512SB). Residual laser light was blocked by bandpass filters, which only transmitted a 20 nm wide spectral window around 890 nm, where the fluorescence intensity of LH2 is maximal. From the wide-field fluorescence images obtained by the CCD camera (Fig. 6.6a, bottom) a spatially isolated LH2 complex was selected for further spectroscopic investigation. After recording a wide-field image, the microscope was switched to the confocal mode by simply rearranging a mirror (Fig. 6.6b, top). In this mode the excitation light is passed through the objective lens in the cryostat, illuminating a diffraction-limited excitation volume (less than 1 mm3) of the sample. The scan mirror in the confocal microscope was then adjusted such that this excitation volume exactly coincided with the position of a selected LH2 complex observed in the wide-field image. The fluorescence, collected by the same objective lens that illuminated the excitation spot, was focussed on a confocally placed avalanche photodiode, for single-photon count6.2.1.2 a b TiSa pump laser pump laser TiSa sample sample objective lens objective lens scan mirror f = 250 mm cut-off filter CCD cryostat with liquid helium (~1.2 K) cut-off filter excitation pinhole detection pinhole 10 mm fluorescence (cps) avalanche photo diode 100 780 800 820 840 860 880 excitation wavelength Figure 6.6. Schematic representation of the two experimental arrangements. (a) Wide-field. In the lower part a typical wide-field image is depicted with an excitation wavelength of 800 nm and detection at 890 nm. (b) Confocal. In the lower part a typical fluorescence-excitation spectrum is shown. 195 196 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy ing (EG&G, SPM 200). A fluorescence-excitation spectrum was obtained by scanning the excitation wavelength, while detecting the fluorescence at 890 nm (Fig. 6.6b, bottom). In the confocal-detection mode the superior background suppression allowed recording of fluorescence-excitation spectra with high signal-to-background ratios [18]. To minimize light-induced fluctuations of the fluorescence intensity on a timescale of a single scan, the spectra were obtained by rapidly scanning the whole spectral range and storing the different traces separately [17,19]. With a scan speed of the laser of 3 nm s 1 and an acquisition time of 10 ms per data point, this yields a nominal resolution of 0.5 cm 1 ensuring that the spectral resolution is limited by the spectral bandwidth of the laser (1 cm 1). Most spectra presented here were obtained by the summation of about 70 scans. To examine the polarization dependence of the spectra, a 1¤2 l plate was put in the confocal excitation path. For each individual complex six spectra were obtained at polarization intervals of 30 h. 6.2.2 Results and Discussion In Fig. 6.7 the fluorescence-excitation spectra of several individual LH2 complexes are shown for comparison. The upper trace shows the fluorescence-excitation spectrum taken from a bulk sample (dashed line) together with the spectrum that results from the summation of the spectra of 19 individual LH2 complexes (solid line). The 2 spectra are in excellent agreement and both feature two broad structureless bands around 800 and 860 nm corresponding to the absorptions of the B800 and B850 pigments of the complex. By measuring the fluorescence-excitation spectra of the individual complexes remarkable features become visible which are obscured in the ensemble average. In particular, a striking difference between the B800 and B850 bands becomes evident. The spectra around 800 nm show a distribution of narrow absorption bands, whereas in the B850 spectral region 2 3 broad bands are present. Before we discuss these observations in detail, a theoretical framework will be provided in order to understand the different features that characterize the individual LH2 spectra. Figure 6.7. Fluorescence-excitation spectra of LH2 complexes of Rps. acidophila. The top traces show the comparison between an ensemble spectrum (dashed line) and the sum of spectra recorded from 19 individual complexes (solid line). For each complex this included 6 individual spectra that were obtained at different excitation polarizations. The lower 5 traces display spectra from single LH2 complexes. All spectra were measured at 1.2 K at 20 W cm 2 with LH2 dissolved in a PVA-buffer solution [20]. fluorescence (cps) 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 200 780 800 820 840 860 880 wavelength (nm) Localized vs. delocalized excitations One of the main functions of the LH2 complex is to transfer energy in the form of an optically excited state. This transfer of energy originates from the electronic interaction between the BChl a pigments. In the simplest approximation of the Coulomb interaction between the electrons of neighboring pigments, the BChl a may be described as interacting point-dipoles having specific mutual orientations and center to center distances [40]. Experimental values for the orientation and distances can be deduced from the crystal structure. In such a simple model there are three main factors that determine the electronic structure and the resulting spectroscopic properties of the LH2 complex: 6.2.2.1 1. The transition energy or site-energy of each pigment. 2. The strength of the electronic interaction between the pigments. 3. The direction and magnitude of the transition dipole moments. 197 198 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy These factors can be combined into the following Hamiltonian: H N P n1 E0 DEn jnihnj N P n1 V0 DVn jnihn 1j H.c. , 1 where E0 denotes the site-energy of each pigment and V0 the nearest-neighbor interaction in a perfect circular system. H. c. stands for the Hermitian conjugate. The energy levels corresponding to the overall system are now determined by the strength of the coupling and the site-energies of the system, while the distribution of oscillator strength of the transitions connecting the energy levels depends also on the orientation of the dipole moments. Local variations in the protein environment of the binding sites give rise to static disorder in the site-energies of the pigments, represented by a random shift of DEn. This disorder is referred to as diagonal disorder and is usually modeled by a Gaussian distribution of site-energies [41]. Any structural disorder or deformation in the ring will cause deviations from the perfect C9 symmetry and results in a variation of the interactions, represented by DVn. This disorder is referred to as off-diagonal disorder. Two limits of the dipolar interaction can be distinguished, that of the weak and the strong coupling. This is depicted schematically in Fig. 6.8 for two interacting dipoles, which corresponds to N 2 in Eq. (1). In the weak coupling case the interaction between the transition dipoles is much smaller than the difference in siteenergies of the two pigments (DE1,2 jDE1 ± DE2j). As a result the excitations are mainly localized on individual pigments. In the extreme limit where V1 II DE1,2 a complete localization of excitation occurs. The spread of the absorption bands reflects directly the spread in site-energies or diagonal disorder. In the strong coupling limit the interaction is much larger than the difference in site-energies of the two pigments. As a result the wavefunctions of the individual pigments are not eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian (Eq. (1)). Instead, linear superpositions of the individual excited state wavefunctions form the set of eigenfunctions, or Frenkel exciton states, leading to a manifold of energy levels as indicated in Fig. 6.8b. In the case of degeneracy where V1 ii DE1,2, the excitation is completely delocalized, i. e., the wavefunctions have equal amplitudes on both pigments. The splitting between the two exciton states is twice the electronic interaction between the monomer pigments. The distribution of oscillator strength over the two exciton levels depends on the mutual orientation of the transition dipole moments. If the dipolar coupling and the site-energy difference are similar in magnitude, the behavior is expected to be intermediate between the extremes of weak and strong coupling. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes a weak coupling: V1 << DE1, 2 E0, 2 DE1, 2 E0, 1 0 2 1 2 1 absorbance b strong coupling: V1 >> DE1, 2 exciton V1 E0+V1 E0, 2 E0, 1 2V1 E0-V1 0 1 2 Figure 6.8. Effects of the interaction (V1) and site-energy difference (DE1,2 jDE1 ± DE2j) on the energy levels and spectra of two monomer pigments 1 and 2. (a) In the limiting case of weak coupling the interaction between the pigments is relatively small and the resulting absorption spectrum is independent of the mutual orientation of the pigments. 1+2 absorbance (b) In the limiting case of strong coupling there is a relatively small difference in site-energies and as a result two new, delocalized exciton states are created belonging to the dimer (12). Spectra are shown for two different orientations of the transition dipole moments, indicated by small arrows. Exciton model for a circular aggregate For a ring of closely interacting pigments, like the B850 band of LH2 it is possible to calculate the energies of the excited states (exciton states) for an unperturbed B850 ring using Eq. (1) with N 18 and DEn DVn 0. The energy levels are depicted in Fig. 6.9, manifold 2. It consists of 16 pairwise degenerate states, labeled by their quantum number k (k e1, e2, e3, e4), and two nondegenerate states (k 0). The manifold is separated into a lower and upper branch owing to the interaction within the dimer (Fig. 6.9, manifold 1). Due to the circular symmetry and orientation of the transition dipoles in the ring almost all oscillator strength is concentrated in the low-energy k e1 degenerate pair. The mutual orientation of the transition moments of these two states is orthogonal in the plane of the ring, as 6.2.2.2 199 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy 2 1 2 k ± 1k = 0 k±2 1 V1~-250 cm -1 k±3 1 energy (units V) 200 k±4 2 0 -1 2V1 k±4 V2~-230 cm-1 k±3 V1~-250 cm-1 k±2 -2 ~9 Å k±1 k=0 Figure 6.9. Schematic representation of the energy level scheme of the excited state manifold of a dimer (manifold 1) and of the B850 ring of LH2 (manifold 2). The mutual orthogonal orientation of the transition moments of the low-energy k e1 degenerate pair is indicated y x by the red and blue arrows. The transitiondipole moments of the pigments are given by the small, black arrows. The interaction within the dimer is V1 (intradimer), whereas the interaction between the dimers is V2 (interdimer). For a detailed description see Ref. [20,21]. indicated by the red and blue arrow. A more extensive description of the exciton manifold for the B850 ring can be found elsewhere [20, 21, 42, 43]. B800 band The fluorescence-excitation spectra of single LH2 complexes show a wide distribution of narrow absorption bands in the B800 region of the spectrum. These bands are spread over the whole inhomogeneously broadened ensemble spectrum. To understand the origin of these bands we should compare the dipolar coupling between the pigments and their spread in site-energies (diagonal disorder). From the crystal structure the dipolar coupling between neighboring pigment is estimated to be about 24 cm 1 (Fig. 6.10a) [42]. The variation in site-energies as estimated from the inhomogeneously broadened ensemble spectrum is around 180 cm 1. This yields a V/DE ratio of about 0.l which is clearly in the weak coupling regime (Fig. 6.8a) and a strong localization of excitation on the individual BChl a is expected [43,44]. We therefore attribute the pattern of spectral bands to absorptions of more or less individual pigments in the B800 band that are separated in their 6.2.2.3 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes a V~-24 cm -1 21 Å y x fluorescence (cps) b Figure 6.10. (a) Schematic representation of the transition dipole moments of the B800 pigments of LH2. (b) Dependence of the B800 fluorescence-excitation spectrum of a single LH2 complex from Rps. acidophila on the polarization of the incident radiation. The polarization vector has been changed in steps of 30h from one spectrum to the next. The vertical scale is valid 100 for the lowest trace, all others are displaced for clarity. Figure 780 reproduced with permission from Ref. [18]. 790 800 810 820 wavelength (nm) spectral positions due to differences in their local environment (inhomogeneous broadening). Based on the kinetic properties of the excited triplet and singlet states of the BChl a pigments in the LH2 complex we estimate the maximum emission rate to be about 2x105 photons s 1, similar to the value obtained by Bopp et al. [45]. The collection efficiency of our microscope is approximately 0.05 % which yields a fluorescence count-rate of roughly 50 100 counts s 1 for the emission of a single BChl a pigment, in agreement with our observations. 201 202 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy Polarization The interpretation of localized excitations in the B800 band is corroborated by the strong dependence of the relative intensities of these lines on the polarization of the incident radiation. In Fig. 6.10b seven fluorescence-excitation spectra of the B800 band of an individual LH2 complex are shown, each taken with a different orientation of the polarization vector of the exciting laser light. It is seen that the intensities of the absorption lines vary appreciably upon changing the polarization. This is what one would expect if the excitations are largely localized on the individual BChl a pigments, because their transition dipole moments are arranged in a circular manner and, as a result of this, all have different orientations. When analyzing the polarization-dependent spectra of a single LH2 complex, one would expect to observe nine absorption lines, corresponding to localized excitations of the nine individual BChl a pigments. However, in these combined spectra typically only six to seven absorption lines were found, supporting the conjecture that a slight delocalization of the excited state occurs over two or three neighboring BChl a pigments in the B800 manifold with a concomitant redistribution of oscillator strength. This arises from occasional (near)-degeneracy of the site-energies of adjacent B800 pigments. Intra- and intercomplex disorder The B800 spectra of Fig. 6.7 and Fig. 6.10b reveal significant variations in the spectral distribution of the individual resonances between different LH2 complexes as well as for the average position of the whole line pattern. Due to the many conformational substates of proteins, one expects strong variations of the electrostatic protein pigment interaction, resulting in a distribution of absorption frequencies of the individual pigments. In general we have to consider two independent contributions to the spectral distribution. First the variation of site energies of BChl a pigments within the same LH2 complex which is referred to as intracomplex heterogeneity or diagonal disorder. Secondly, for different complexes, the changes in the spectral position of the weighted average (spectral mean) of the whole spectrum which is called intercomplex heterogeneity or sample inhomogeneity. Obviously, the study of individual LH2 complexes allows one to discriminate between these two contributions and to investigate them separately. In order to find a measure for the intercomplex heterogeneity we have defined the spectral mean value, n, of the fluorescence-excitation spectrum of a single LH2 complex by P n i I(i) n(i) P , I(i) 2 i where I(i) denotes the fluorescence intensity at datapoint i, n(i) the spectral position corresponding to datapoint i, and the sum runs over all datapoints of the spectrum. The histogram for n, obtained from the spectra of 46 complexes, is depicted in Fig. 6.11a and has a width of about Z120 cm 1. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes intercomplex heterogeneity intracomplex heterogeneity n (nm) 790 795 800 805 810 b a 8 occurrence 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 12600 12500 12400 12300 n (cm-1) Figure 6.11. (a) Distribution of the spectral mean for 46 LH2 complexes in the B800 region of the spectrum featuring the amount of intercomplex heterogeneity. 0 0 20 40 60 80 100120 sn (cm-1) (b) Distribution of standard deviations for the spread of absorption lines in the individual fluorescence-excitation spectra for the same 46 LH2 complexes. Figure reproduced with permission from Ref. [19]. The intracomplex heterogeneity or diagonal disorder is extracted from the data by calculating the standard deviations s n of the intensity distributions in the individual spectra n2 ]1/2 , s n [n2 3 where n2 is given by P n2 i I(i) n(i)2 P . I(i) 4 i The result is shown in Fig. 6.11b. The distribution for s n is centered at a value of about 55 cm 1. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the distribution of site-energies is obtained by multiplying this value by a factor of 2.36. This yields, for the FWHM of the diagonal disorder, a value of 130 cm 1. Clearly, an ensemble spectrum reflects the convolution of both contributions to the heterogeneity. From our data we expect for the B800 band a total inhomogeneous linewidth of about 180 cm 1, in good agreement with the results from bulk spectra of LH2 of Rps. acidophila taken at 1.2 K. 203 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy B850 band In all spectra of the B850 band two broad absorption lines around 860 nm are observed. For 40 % of the complexes these two lines are accompanied by a weaker transition at higher energy (Fig. 6.7). By exciting the complexes with linearly polarized light at different polarization angles, the relative orientation of the transitiondipole moments associated with the two prominent absorptions around 860 nm was determined. For all the complexes studied we found that these transitiondipole moments were mutually orthogonal (Fig. 6.12a). The high-energy absorption band (Fig. 6.12a, complex 3) appears to be homogeneous, and shows only a slight dependence of its total intensity on the polarization of the exciting laser radiation. In Fig. 6.12b the distributions of the spectral positions of the three observed transitions are depicted. For the red absorption the distribution is centered at 864 nm. The transition next highest in energy, featuring a transition-dipole moment oriented perpendicular to the former one, shows a distribution centered around 6.2.2.4 285 cm-1 110 cm b a 10 1 200 100 5 0 0 10 2 100 50 occurrence fluorescence (cps) 204 0 3 -1 864 856 5 0 5 841 600 300 0 820 840 860 880 0 820 wavelength (nm) Figure 6.12. (a) Fluorescence-excitation spectra of the B850 spectral region of three individual LH2 complexes. For each complex two spectra with mutually orthogonal polarization (arrows) of the excitation are shown. (b) Distribution of the spectral positions for nineteen complexes of the three observed 840 860 880 wavelength (nm) bands. The average separation between the 864 and 856 bands (dEe1) is 110 cm 1 and the energy separation between the spectral mean of these two bands and the higher energy 841 band is 285 cm 1. The experimental conditions are the same as in Fig. 6.7. Figure reproduced with permission from Ref. [20]. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 856 nm. The high-energy absorption present in some of the spectra is distributed around 841 nm as can be seen in the lower panel of Fig. 6.12b The corresponding bands in the single molecule spectra will be referred to as the 864, 856 and 841 nm bands, respectively. The average energy separation between the 841 band and the spectral mean of the two mutually perpendicularly polarized transitions is 285 e 35 cm 1. The linewidths of the 864 and 856 nm absorption bands in the individual spectra range from 50 to 250 cm 1 with an average value of 120 cm 1. This corresponds to a value for the total dephasing time between 100 and 20 fs, in agreement with the ensemble averaged values reported for the B850 band at low temperature [15,41]. The two prominent absorptions around 864 and 856 nm (Fig. 6.12b) are assigned to the low energy k e1 exciton states, which agrees with their mutual orthogonal transition-dipole moments lying in the plane of the ring. The degeneracy of these states is lifted. The absorption around 841 nm (Fig. 6.12b) is attributed to higher exciton states. The lifting of degeneracy of the k e1 states as well as the appreciable oscillator strength of the higher exciton states is ascribed to static energetic disorder in the individual LH2 complexes. For the energy separation between the k e1 states, dEe1, we obtain a distribution centered at 110 cm 1. In order to ascertain that this splitting is not a matrixinduced effect we performed additional experiments with LH2 dissolved in glycerol. For this matrix we observed a similar separation in energy for the two mutually orthogonal absorptions. Therefore we conclude that the degeneracy of the k e1 exciton states is lifted by an intrinsic effect of the BChl a assembly. For all the complexes we have studied so far, it was possible to find a polarization of the incident excitation light such that either the 864 or the 856 band could be exclusively observed. Consequently, we conclude that the LH2 complexes are oriented within the PVA matrix with their C9 axis perpendicular to the plane of the substrate at which the sample is deposited. This might result from the spin-coating procedure, which introduces a shear force in the film, in combination with the thickness of the film (less than 1 mm) after evaporation of most of the solvent. PVA layers that were prepared by simply spreading a drop of the LH2/PVA solution onto the substrate did not show such a high degree of orientation. In the following subsections we will go into detail on both the higher exciton states and the origin of the static disorder. Spectral diffusion and the k 0 state A crucial check for the applicability of the exciton model to the B850 system would be the observation of the k 0 exciton state. The fluorescence lifetime of LH2 from Rps. acidophila is about 1 ns and corresponds to the decay time of the k 0 level. Consequently a relatively narrow absorption line is expected for this state. For 3 out of 19 complexes we have indeed been able to clearly observe such a line on the low-energy side of the k e1 transitions. Rapid spectral diffusion smears out this line and hinders its experimental observation (Fig. 6.13, bottom panel). Therefore we modified the data acquisition in a similar way as reported earlier [19]. Repetitive scans of the B850 spectral region were recorded at a high scan rate (3 nm s 1) and stored separately in computer 205 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy fluorescence (cps) wavelength (nm) 855 857 859 k=0 100 60 600 time (sec) 300 fluorescence (cps) 206 0 100 60 855 857 859 wavelength (nm) Figure 6.13. Fluorescence-excitation spectrum of the red wing of the longwavelength absorption in the B850 band. In the middle panel a stack of 200 consecutively recorded spectra (3 s per scan) is shown where the fluorescence intensity is given by the color code (yellow corresponds to high intensities). The spectrum in the bottom panel corresponds to an average of all scans, whereas the top panel corresponds to an average of only those scans that are covered by the box. Figure taken in part from Ref. [17]. memory. In this way the spectral features could be followed in time. By selecting a time interval where the spectral diffusion is limited and taking the average of only this interval, the presence of the lowest k 0 exciton state could be ascertained (Fig. 6.13, top panel). The k 0 transition observed for the three complexes carries an oscillator strength of 2 9 % of the total oscillator strength in the B850 band, in good agreement with theoretical calculations [46]. Although the statistics is poor, the k 0 transition in the three complexes suggests that the transition dipole moment of the k 0 state becomes stronger when the energy separation between the k 0 and k e1 states increases. This is in qualitative agreement with model calculations on this system [43,47,48,51]. C2 modulation To analyze our observations on the B850 band in more detail we first consider the effects of random disorder in the site-energies of the B850 pig- 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes ments on the properties of the exciton manifold of the unperturbed ring of BChl a pigments [20,43,47 51] . Such diagonal disorder modifies the spacing between the exciton levels and removes the pair-wise degeneracy. Secondly, it leads to a redistribution of oscillator strength from the k e1 states preferentially to the adjacent exciton states, i. e. k 0 and k e2. Consequently we might assign the absorption around 841 nm to the k e2 exciton states. From the energy separation of 285 cm 1 between the k e1 and the k e2 states we then derive for the average interaction strength between the pigments a value of 585 e35 cm 1 (Vavg [V1V2]/2). This value is much larger than the interactions calculated from the structure, which are found to be in the range 200 400 cm 1 [41 43,48,52]. It appears that these values are relatively insensitive to the level of sophistication of the calculations. Although there is some spread in the calculated interaction energies, we conclude that assignment of the 841 nm band to the k e2 exciton states leads to a discrepancy between the experimentally determined interaction energy and the calculated values. In addition to this discrepancy, several other observations cannot be explained on the basis of purely random diagonal disorder. Firstly, with the value for the interaction strength as derived above, a random disorder with a FWHM of about 750 cm 1 is needed to explain an average splitting of 110 cm 1 for the k e1 states. Such a large disorder will lead to a strong broadening of the exciton manifold and, as a result, the spectral width of the simulated ensemble spectrum would be significantly larger than that of the experimentally observed absorption spectrum. Secondly, random diagonal disorder affects all degenerate pairs of the exciton manifold in the same way. In other words, a diagonal disorder sufficient to explain the splitting of the k e1 states causes also a splitting of 110 cm 1 for the k e2 which is clearly not observed. Therefore we come to the conclusion that the 841 nm band cannot be assigned to the k e2 exciton states, and that an alternative explanation for the observed features of the electronic structure of LH2 has to be found. In order to explain the magnitude of the splitting of the k e1 exciton states we propose a C2 -type modulation in terms of symmetry of the interaction between adjacent B850 pigments in LH2. Such a two-fold symmetric modulation couples specifically exciton states that differ by Dk e2 [20,21]. In addition to lifting the degeneracy of the k e1 states, it leads to a transfer of oscillator strength from the k e1 to the k e3 states. Based on this conjecture, we assign the 841 nm absorption band to the k e3 exciton states. From this assignment we find for the average interaction strength a value of Vavg 240 e 35 cm 1 which gives V1 254 e 35 cm 1 for the intradimer and V2 225 e 35 cm 1 for the interdimer interaction if the ratio V2 / V1 is calculated using the point-dipole approximation. These values are within the range of what is currently accepted [41]. The C2 -type modulation of the interaction lifts the degeneracy of the k e3 states only in higher order. In view of the width of the lines and the signal-tonoise ratio of our spectra we are not able to resolve the resulting, small splitting of the k e3 band. However, as shown in Fig. 6.12a, we do observe a slight polarization-dependence of the intensity of this band. 207 208 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy Another indication for the presence of a C2 modulation of the interaction is provided by the intensity ratio of the 856 and 864 nm bands. With purely random disorder the average of this intensity ratio would be one. We observe for most of the complexes that the intensity of the 864 nm band is larger than the intensity of the 856 nm band (Fig. 6.12a). This result can be reproduced by assuming a structural deformation, which leads to a C2 -type modulation of the interactions [21]. A model of elliptical deformation The origin of the C2 -type modulation of the interactions may be attributed to a geometrical deformation of the overall LH2 ring structure. Since the leading term of the deformation of a circle into an ellipse has the same angular dependence as the C2 -type modulation, we restrict ourselves to an elliptical deformation in the plane of the ring. Different arrangements of the 18 pigments on an ellipse are possible [21]. It turns out that only one model can consistently describe the experimental observations. In this model (Model C of Ref. [21]) the inter-pigment distance on the ellipse is modulated in such a way that it is the longest at the long axis of the ellipse. This arrangement is generated by displacing each pigment along the line connecting the center of the ring and the position of the pigment in the unperturbed circle, retaining its angular coordinate. To accommodate the deformation of the ring, the pigments were re-oriented in such a way that the transition moments preserved their angle with the local tangent of the ellipse. In Fig. 6.14a the new arrangement of the pigments after the elliptical deformation of the ring is illustrated. The effect of the deformation on the low energy exciton states is shown in Fig. 6.14b together with a typical single LH2 spectrum at two mutually orthogonal polarizations. The most pronounced effect of the deformation is the energy splitting of the k e1 states which exceeds that of the k e2 and e3 states. To explain a k e1 splitting of 110 cm 1 a deformation amplitude for the ring structure of dr/r0 z 7 % is required, where r0 is the radius of the unperturbed ring and the long and short axes of the ellipse deviate from r0 by dr. A value of dr/r0 z 8 % is needed to explain an intensity ratio of 0.7 between the 856 and 864 band [21]. The mutual orthogonality of the transition-dipole moments of the k e1 states is not significantly affected by this deformation, consistent with the experimental results. This is illustrated in Fig. 6.14c, where the wavefunctions of the two components of the k e1 states for a deformation of dr/r0 8 % are shown. The lower and the higher component of the k e1 states are denoted by k 1low and k 1high, respectively. The amplitude of the wavefunction of the k 1low state is largest at the short axis of the ellipse, resulting from the stronger interaction between the pigments which yields a decrease in the energy of the state. The wavefunction of the k 1high state has the largest amplitude where the interaction is the weakest. The bi-directional arrow in the figure indicates the absorption intensity and its polarization. Due to the local curvature of the ellipse, the major Qy transition dipole vectors in the k 1low (1high) state make a larger (smaller) angle with one other. Consequently, the sum of the dipolar vectors in the k 1high state is smaller than that in the k 1low state. Because the node of the k 1high state is orthogonal to that of the k 1low state, the two transition dipoles are mutually orthogonal. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes a Figure 6.14. (a) Schematic representation of the transition dipole moments of the B850 pigments of LH2 in the perfect b ring configuration (gray) and with a large elliptical deforma12200 tion of dr/r0 20 % (yellow). (b) Schematic representation of the lowest excited states of the exciton manifold of the 12000 B850 ring of LH2 in the perfect k=±3 circular arrangement (manifold 1) and including an elliptical deformation (manifold 2). The low energy k e1 state (k 11800 k = ± 2 1low) is marked by (*) and the high energy (k 1high) by (#). On the right two experimental k=±1 spectra are depicted at mutual k=0 orthogonal orientation. The ex11600 perimental conditions are the same as in Fig. 6.7. (c) Pictorial representation of the k 1low and 1high states. The length of each arrow is proportional to the amplitude c k = 1 low of the exciton wavefunction at the particular pigment position. The bi-directional arrow in the ellipse represents the absorption intensity and its polarization. The ellipse and the wavefunctions are drawn for dr/r0 8 %. See also Ref. [21]. 1 2 k=±3 # * dE±1 k=±1 200 cps k = 1 high Thus an elliptical deformation of dr/r0 7 % 8 % in a simple point-dipole approximation explains the major features of the single molecule spectra, i. e., dEe1 110 cm 1 for the average k e1 splitting, the average intensity ratio of 0.7 between the 856 and 864 bands, and their mutually orthogonal polarization. Random disorder It is seen from the histograms of Fig. 6.12a and b that the splitting (dEe1) and the intensity ratio of the 856 and 864 nm bands vary from one complex to the other. Since the C2 -type modulation of the interactions alone would result in the same splitting and intensity ratio of the k e1 states for all the complexes, these variations clearly indicate heterogeneity among the B850 pigments. Such heterogeneity is caused by random disorder that can exist in both the site- 209 210 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy energies of the pigments (random diagonal disorder) and/or their interactions (random off-diagonal disorder). Because dEe1 and the intensity ratio of the k e1 exciton states are determined by the disorder within one complex, these disorders should be considered as intracomplex disorder. Similarly, it can be expected that the amplitude of the elliptical deformation will be subjected to a distribution, which should be considered as intercomplex disorder. Since it is difficult to separate all the different types of heterogeneity we approximate the description of the heterogeneity in the B850 band by a two-step procedure. Firstly, we consider the character of the excited states of the individual complexes, which we assume to be determined by intracomplex disorder. In the second step we investigate the consequences that result for the ensemble of complexes when intercomplex disorder is taken into account. To model the individual complexes we fixed the amplitude of the elliptical deformation to a particular value and only random diagonal intracomplex disorder was included in the simulations. The result of these simulations are presented in Fig. 6.15 and compared with the experimental data. The solid black squares in Fig. 6.15a represent the result of a Monte Carlo simulation of the distribution of dEe1. The deformation amplitude is dr/r0 8.5 % and the intracomplex diagonal disorder (G intra) has a FWHM of 250 cm 1. It appears that the simulation fits the experimental distribution very well. The center of the distribution is largely determined by the amplitude of the elliptical deformation, but it is also influenced by the random disorder. The random disorder mixes the k 0 state with the lower component of the k e1 states, by which oscillator strength is transferred to the k 0 state. At the same time, the lower component of the k e1 states shifts to higher energy, making the separation between the k e1 states smaller. Thus, the center of the dEe1 distribution will be shifted to a smaller value than in the absence of random disorder. Accordingly, the deformation amplitude derived from the simulation, which includes random disorder, is slightly larger than the previously mentioned value of 7 %. The width of the dEe1 distribution in Fig. 6.15a is assumed to be mainly determined by the random diagonal disorder. The value of 250 cm 1 sets an upper value for the random diagonal disorder, because the experimentally observed distribution includes contributions from other types of heterogeneity, which are neglected in the simulation. The results of the simulation of the distribution of the intensity ratio between the 856 and 864 nm bands is shown by the solid black squares in Fig. 6.15b. In the simulation the intensity of the k 0 state is included in that of the 864 nm band, since in most of the complexes the narrow k 0 band is hidden under the broad 864 nm band, and is not distinguishable due to its rapid spectral diffusion. The simulation gives reasonable agreement with the experimental distribution. Fig. 6.15c shows the simulated distribution of the angle between the two transition-dipoles of the k e1 states. These results of the numerical calculations on the single LH2 spectra are confirmed by an analytical analysis of the data by Mostovoy and Knoester [46]. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes intracomplex heterogeneity a 6 2000 2 0 0 0 40 8 80 120 -1 DE±1 (cm ) 160 200 b 3000 4 0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 Intensity (856/864) occurrence (simulation) occurrence (experimental) 4 0 2.0 4000 c 2000 0 30 60 Figure 6.15. Comparison between the experimental distributions (histograms) and numerical simulations (solid squares) of the energy separation, the intensity ratio and the mutual polarization angle of the k e1 transitions in the B850 band. The experimental data refer to the left vertical scale and have been obtained at the same experimental conditions as given in Fig. 6.7. The numerical simulations refer to the right vertical scale and are based on an elliptical 90 120 f (degrees) 150 deformation dr/r0 8.5 %. For more details on the simulations see Ref. [20]. (a) Energy separation of the two k e1 transitions. (b) Intensity ratio 856/864 of the two k e1 transitions. (c) Mutual angle between the k e1 transition-dipole moments. Figure reproduced with permission from Ref. [20] Intra- and intercomplex disorder The value of 250 cm 1 FWHM for the random diagonal disorder in the B850 band of LH2 in a PVA film is smaller than the values reported by other authors [41]. With this value for the diagonal disorder some structure remains in the simulation of the experimentally observed B850 band of a bulk sample. In Fig. 6.16 the calculated and the observed spectra are shown, and it is seen that the splitting between the two components of the k e1 states, induced by the elliptical deformation and random disorder, is still visible in the simulated curve (dashed line), in contrast to the observed spectrum. The reason for this apparent discrepancy is that the value of 250 cm 1 for the heterogeneity obtained from the k e1 splitting reflects only the heterogeneity within individual com- 211 6.2 Fluorescence-excitation Spectroscopy 1 intensity (a.u.) 212 0 820 840 860 880 wavelength (nm) Comparison between the experimental, low-temperature ensemble spectrum of LH2 (solid line) and two simulated spectra. The experimental ensemble spectrum lacks the long-wavelength tail, because of overlap with the fluorescence-detection window. For both simulated spectra the deformation amplitude is dr/r0 8.5 %. Dashed line: only intracomplex Figure 6.16. heterogeneity is taken into account. Dotted line: both, intra- and intercomplex heterogeneity, are included in the simulation, with G intra 250 cm 1 and G inter 120 cm 1. The individual transitions have homogeneous Lorentzian line shapes with a width (FWHM) of 100 cm 1 (k 0 0) and 10 cm 1 (k 0). For more details on the simulations see Ref. [20]. plexes (intracomplex disorder). In order to describe the ensemble spectrum the sample heterogeneity or intercomplex disorder should also be included [19,48]. Such heterogeneity originates from the slightly different environments of the different LH2 complexes in the host matrix. From the distribution of the spectral lines observed in the B850 band (Fig. 6.12b) it is not possible to find an accurate value for the intercomplex diagonal disorder, since the spectral positions depend not only on the site-energies of the pigments, but also on their interactions. For the B800 band this is not the case, since the interactions are relatively weak compared to the diagonal disorder [16]. Therefore, a good estimate for the intercomplex diagonal disorder of the B850 pigments is obtained from the variation in spectral mean in the B800 band of each LH2 complex. For the B800 band a value of 120 cm 1 FWHM was found [19]. Taking the same value for the intercomplex diagonal disorder of the B850 band, we performed a Monte Carlo simulation of the ensemble spectrum. The result is shown in Fig. 6.16 (dotted line). The simulation nicely reproduces the experimentally measured ensemble spectrum, which indicates that both inter- and intracomplex disorder are relevant. The direct insight into both the inter- and intracomplex disorder of an ensemble of single LH2 complex has important implications for the discussion on the delocalization length in these type of systems. By delocalization length we mean the number of pigments that contribute to a particular exciton state, which for the 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes B850 band is obviously a number between 1 and 18. This length is widely perceived as a key characteristic of the microscopic exciton state. Bakalis and Knoester [53] discussed the determination of the delocalization length from the width of the ensemble-averaged absorption spectrum. Since the intercomplex disorder does not affect the delocalization length, whereas it does contribute to the width of the ensemble averaged spectrum, this will lead to an underestimation of the delocalization length through this method. A similar reasoning applies to the value for the delocalization length as determined by transient absorption spectroscopy [53]. On the basis of the single LH2 spectra it can be shown that in the B850 ring of LH2 the excitation is largely delocalized over the ring [46]. 6.2.3 Conclusions The results presented in Section 6.2 show that single molecule spectroscopic techniques at cryogenic temperatures can be applied successfully to elucidate the electronic structure of photosynthetic pigment protein complexes. The advantage of the method is that effects of ensemble averaging, which are typical for conventional forms of spectroscopy, are eliminated. The excitations in the B800 band are localized on a limited number (2 3) of BChl a pigments. The intra- and intercomplex disorder are determinded to be 120 and 130 cm 1 FWHM respectively. The B850 assembly of BChl a pigments in LH2 represents a strongly coupled system, where the electronic properties are appropriately described as Frenkel excitons. The observations are consistent with alternating nearest-neighbor interaction energies of 254 e 35 and 225 e 35 cm 1, respectively, with a distribution of site energies (diagonal disorder) given by a FWHM with an upper limit of 250 cm 1. These parameters imply that the optical excitations are largely delocalized over the ring of BChl a pigments [46]. In addition to the random diagonal disorder, a C2 -type modulation of the intermolecular interaction has to be assumed to account for the relative intensities and the spectral positions of the exciton transitions. This modulation is presumably caused by a structural deformation of the LH2 complex, which transforms the B850 ring from a circular to an elliptical geometry. It is not surprising that our experimental results cannot be interpreted on the basis of an exciton model for a perfect circular aggregate of nine dimers. The ensemble [41] and single molecule spectroscopic experiments [17,45,54] on LH2 already indicated the presence of disorder in this system. It is generally believed that the origin of such disorder is the random variation in the site-energies of the pigments involved [41]. However, a random distribution of the coupling between the pigments has also been suggested [55]. Such random disorder has very specific implications for the structure of the exciton manifold but this alone is not sufficient to describe our experimental observations consistently. Based on the magnitude of the splitting between the k e1 states, which can only be caused by a C2 -type modulation of the interactions, we suggest that the B850 ring is transformed from a perfect in-plane isotropic absorber and emitter into an elliptic one. Other groups have also found evidence for anisotropy in the fluorescence emission 213 214 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants of single LH2 complexes at room temperature and low temperature using either mica plates or polymer films to immobilize the complexes [54,56]. The modulation of the interaction between the pigments most probably is related to a geometrical distortion of the LH2 ring. Bopp et al. [56] showed that the anisotropic behavior of single LH2 complexes at room temperature could be very well explained by an elliptical deformation of the LH2 ring, which varies in time. Such a temporal variation of the ellipticity cannot be observed at 1.2 K where the complexes presumably are trapped in local minima of the potential energy surface, each corresponding to a distinct orientation of the elliptical deformation. The reduced symmetry of the isolated LH2 complexes at low temperature and at room temperature is at odds with the nine-fold symmetry of LH2 in crystalline form. It might be that the dense packing of LH2 complexes in the crystal provides a stabilizing force which is absent in the isolated complexes as already suggested by van Oijen et al. [17]. Whether or not the static deformation is representative of the structure of LH2 in detergent solution or in membranes remains to be answered. Experiments are in progress to study this aspect in more detail. Nevertheless, this does not significantly affect our conclusions about (static) disorder, the strength of the intermolecular interactions and the delocalization of optical excitations over the ring. Static disorder is a result of the variation of site energies, and this variation depends on very local conformation parameters. The interaction strength is determined by intermolecular distances and the average of the modulated interactions in our model correspond to that of a fully symmetric LH2 ring. Delocalization at low temperature (1.2 K) is determined by the degree of static disorder with respect to the interaction strength. At higher temperatures thermally induced effects will dominate, and dynamic electron phonon coupling will lead to a fast hopping-type motion of localized excitations. From the present experiments we have derived a basic framework for the electronic structure of LH2, and the parameters that we have obtained should be considered in describing the properties of LH2 at room temperature in detergent solution, as well as in vivo. 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants In contrast to LHC-II there are no high resolution structure data available for LHC-II. In addition presently available data do not suggest a high symmetry of the complex. Nevertheless LHC-II is a particularly interesting complex for single molecule spectroscopy, since the currently available structure data leave open a number of questions regarding for example the orientation of the chlorophyll molecules with respect to the proteins. Single molecule spectroscopy is ideally suited to answer these questions. The following paragraph describes first steps towards that goal. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 6.3.1 Experimental LHC-II was prepared from pea leaves (Pisum sativum L.) according to the procedure of Krupa et al. [57]. The complexes were stored in buffer (10 mM Tricine, pH 7.8) at 77 K until used. For sample preparation the stock solution was diluted with buffer containing 1 % detergent (n-octyl b-d-glucopyranoside, Sigma). One drop (100 ml) of the diluted solution was mixed with 1 ml of a 1 % PVA1) solution and immediately spin-coated onto a clean cover glass to obtain thin LHC-II doped films. In the case of room temperature measurements such a sample shows stable fluorescence for several hours. Cooled to a temperature less than 77 K the complexes are stable for weeks. The low final LHC-II concentration allows the spatial selection of individual LHC-II complexes. The complete procedure of final sample preparation and mounting was done in the dark. Monomers were prepared by incubation of 1 mg ml 1of the trimeric complex with 0.1 U ml 1 phospholipase A2 (Sigma, #P-6534) for 2 h at room temperature. The monomers were separated from the trimers using sucrose gradient centrifugation. (For a detailed description see Nussberger et al. [58]) Sample preparation of the monomers was exactly the same as for the trimers. For all optical investigations a home-built beam scanning confocal microscope was used operating in the temperature range of 300 1.8 K. The objective (63x, 0.85NA, Melles Griot) was mounted inside the cryostat enabling polarization studies as well as fluorescence emission spectroscopy. Excitation via the 647 nm line of a Kr-ion laser was used. Excitation spectra were recorded using a narrow band dye laser (Coherent 699-21, line width 1 MHz) operating with DCM dye. Fluorescence light was separated from stray light using holographic notch filters (Kaiser) and detected by an avalanche photo diode (EG&G) or focused on a spectrograph (0.25 m, Acton Research) equipped with a back-illuminated CCD camera (Princeton Instruments). 6.3.2 Polarization and Spectral Distribution of the Fluorescence Emission of Single LHCII Monomers and Trimers Investigations on the polarization properties of the light emitted by single LHC-II trimers or monomers have been performed to obtain information on the number of emitting states. For better separation between excitation and fluorescence complexes were excited in the Chl b-region at 647 nm. Polarization of the fluorescence was determined using a permanently turning polarizer (Glan Thompsonprism) in front of the detector. The degree of polarization (p) is defined as Imax Imin p , where Imax and Imin are maximum and minimum fluorescence inImax tensities of the cos2 -fitted intensity traces. For non-polarized emission p0 whereas 1) PVA ± Polyvinyl alcohol 215 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants fluorescence / a.u. Figure 6.17. (a) Polarization modulation trace of a single LHC-II monomer at room temperature. Complexes are immobilized in a thin PVA matrix and excited via the Chl b absorption band at 647 nm. (b) Histogram of the degree of polarization. Most monomers show linearly polarized emission. The solid line shows a simulation of the emission polarization assuming a single emitting randomly oriented dipole. A 2000 1000 0 0 5 40 50 time / s 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0,0 B # molecules 216 monomeric LHC-II 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 degree of polarisation for linearly polarized emission p1. At room temperature the investigation of single light-harvesting complexes is complicated by photobleaching. Nevertheless, in degassed buffer observation times up to minutes allow one to determine the degree of polarization with sufficient accuracy. Figure 6.17a shows a typical polarization modulation trace of a LHC-II monomer. The fluorescence is linearly polarized until the complex is irreversibly photobleached in a single step after 50 s. The histogram in Fig. 6.17b shows that most of the monomers emit linearly polarized light. A few monomers show two-step photobleaching however most complexes shoe one-step bleaching, typical for single quantum systems. As expected, traces of trimers are more complicated. This is why the investigation of the fluorescence polarization of trimers has been carried out at low and at room temperature. Figure 6.18 contains a histogram of p from 70 single LHC-II trimers at T1.8 K. 20 15 10 5 0 degree of polarisation Figure 6.18. Histogram of the degree of polarization of trimers at T1.8 K. Most complexes show p values around 0.4. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 10 8 # molecules Figure 6.19. Bleaching behavior of trimers at room temperature. The histograms show the distribution of the degree of polarization before the third last step (A), the second last step (B), and the final step (C). A trimeric LHC-II at T=300K third last step B second last step 6 4 2 10 # molecules 8 6 4 2 0 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0,0 # molecules C last step 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 degree of polarisation From the histogram it is seen that most of the LHC-II complexes emit light with p0.4. In the temperature range 1.8 I T / KI100 there is no significant effect of temperature on p. Photobleaching in trimers never commences in a single step. Most of the trimers exhibit a two or three jump behavior. In a couple of cases we also found trimers showing more than three jumps, which may be due to trimer aggregation or intensity fluctuations of monomeric subunits. Most importantly, at room temperature there are visible intensity jumps in the traces which also change the degree of polarization. The histograms in Fig. 6.19 summarize the evolution of p for three-step photobleaching. It also seems worth mentioning that most of the trimeric complexes show linearly polarized fluorescence before final bleaching, comparable to the behavior of monomers. One typical emission spectrum of a single LHC-II trimer at low temperature (T1.8 K) is shown in Fig. 6.20A, recorded with an acquisition time of 200 s. The spectrum represents a convolution of a number of hardly resolved emission 217 218 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants 300 Figure 6.20. Fluorescence emission spectra of trimeric LHC-II at 1.8 K. (A) Acquisition time of 200 s. (B) Example of an emission spectrum with an acquisition time of 5 s. A 200 100 0 20 675 680 685 680 685 B 10 0 675 wavelength / nm lines. The spectral width is roughly 100 cm 1. Different trimers show differences in spectral width and shape. The complex spectral shape is due to spectral diffusion which is easily seen when reducing the acquisition time (see Fig. 6.20B). For a closer investigation of this spectral diffusion we recorded a series of 500 spectra shown in Fig. 6.20B using an acquisition time of 5 s per spectrum. Typical fluorescence emission spectra of LHC-II monomers and trimers with short acquisition times are compared in Fig. 6.21. In general, monomeric LHC-II complexes show less lines than trimers. Often we find a single line, while trimers frequently show three lines. The lines are separated by 20 100 cm 1. LHC-II monomers build a strongly coupled system of 12 Chl with fast energy transfer towards the red-most Chl a molecule in the complex [24,27]. It is generally accepted that there is a large density of states in the red wing of the absorption spectrum. Currently it is believed that 5 Chl molecules absorb light within an interval of 250 cm 1 from the energetically lowest Chl a molecule. Assuming Boltzman equilibrium, at room temperature all of these molecules should be populated and hence contribute to the total fluorescence. The finding that LHC monomers emit linear polarized fluorescence is thus rather surprising. The most trivial ex- 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 8 Fluorescence Intensity / a.u. 6 4 2 4 2 676 678 680 682 684 Wavelength / nm Figure 6.21. Typical emission spectra of a trimeric (a) and monomeric (b) LHC-II at low temperature (T1.8 K). Acquisition time in both cases was 10 s. planation would be that the transition dipole moments of all Chl molecules contributing to the fluorescence are parallel. Structural data reveal the binding sites of Chl molecules and also determine the orientation of the plane of the Chls but do not uncover the orientation of the transition dipole moments within this plane. Thus it cannot be excluded that the transition dipole moments of the five molecules are parallel though from structure data [59] this seems to be highly unlikely. Of course the assumption that there is thermal equilibrium between the redmost Chl could also be wrong, possibly because of a large energy barrier between the individual molecules. There will be thermal equilibrium among the five red most molecules only if there is a sizeable coupling between them. The coupling among Chl a molecules is known to be low [58]. However time-resolved optical 219 220 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants spectroscopy shows that the slowest time constant in the energy transfer among Chl a is of the order of 10 ps [23]. This is faster than the lifetime of the first excited state of the Chls (around 5 ns) such that the lowest Chl states should be in thermal equilibrium. A possible explanation of our experimental finding is that the five molecules have highly different photophysical parameters, such that only one molecule has a high triplet quenching efficiency. The fluorescence of a single Chl molecule can only be detected if the triplet state of this Chl is quenched by a carotenoid. The saturated fluorescence intensity is given by Isat k12 k32 FF 2 k32 /k13 5 where FF is the fluorescence quantum yield, k12 is the inverse lifetime of the first excited singlet state, k32 the population rate of the triplet state and k13 is the decay rate of this state. Realistic values for Chl yield a maximum fluorescence intensity Isat500 photons s 1. With a detection efficiency less than 1 %, the resulting number of photocounts s 1 will be below the dark count rate of the detector. Efficient triplet quenching by carotenoids may reduce k13 by two orders of magnitude and hence Isat will increase by the same factor. The fluorescence signal of one Chl possessing an efficiently quenched triplet state can thus be much higher than that of the other Chls. Triplet quenching of the red most Chl also makes sense from a physiological point of view since this molecule will be the one with the highest probability for intersystem crossing. Efficient quenching of only a single Chl would also explain the discrepancy between ensemble absorption and single molecule emission data. Due to the low excitation intensities in ensemble experiments quenching of the triplet state often does not influence the extinction coefficient. In single molecule experiments one usually works in the nonlinear regime i. e. close to saturation of the singlet transition. The p values for trimers at low temperatures are distributed between 0 and 1 with a marked peak around 0.4. This is strong indication that there is more than one emitting state per trimer. From previous ensemble measurements [27] and our fluorescence emission spectra (see Fig. 6.21) it seems to be evident that the red-most Chl a molecules are only weakly coupled to Chl a in neighboring monomers. It is thus reasonable to assume that there are three emitting states per trimer. By further assuming that the trimers are randomly oriented in the polymer film one can try to simulate the histogram (Fig. 6.22). If one assumes that the transition dipole moments of the red-most Chl a are oriented in the symmetry plane of the LHC II trimer (membrane plane) a broad distribution of p-values between 0 and 1 is obtained, which does not fit the data (Fig. 6.22, dashed line). To achieve a distribution obtaining a pronounced peak around p0.4 it is necessary to tilt the dipoles out of the symmetry plane. In the case of an isotropic distribution of orientations within the PVA matrix the best fit is obtained by assuming an angle of either 25h or 47h between the plane of symmetry and the transition dipole mo- 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 6 5 4 3 2 Simulation of the histogram assuming a tilt angle of 0h (dashed line) and 47h (solid line) between the symmetry plane (membrane plane) and the orientation of the dipole moments of the trimer. Figure 6.22. 1 0 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 degree of polarisation ments of the Chls as shown in Fig. 6.22, solid line. The discrepancy between the simulation and the measured histogram may be due to a distribution of orientations which is not completely isotropic in thin polymer films. Such behavior was found in spin-coated samples of light-harvesting complexes of purple bacteria [17]. In contrast to monomers the trimers photobleach in multiple steps. This is further indication that monomeric subunits in trimers are only weakly coupled, otherwise we would expect to find single step photobleaching. In previous studies the coupling among Chl molecules in different monomeric subunits has been estimated to be roughly 5 cm 1 [27]. From our fluorescence emission spectra we know that the energetic disorder among monomers is around 100 cm 1. From our experiments we thus conclude that the excitation energy is localized on individual Chl a molecules in the monomeric subunits and not delocalized over the trimer. Fluorescence emission spectra of monomers and trimers show a number of well resolved lines. The linewidth of the emission spectra in Fig. 6.20 and 6.21 is limited by the spectrometer resolution. Fluorescence excitation spectra (see Fig. 6.23) show a line width of the red-most Chl a states of around G= 0,65 GHz 75 50 25 681,6 681,8 682,0 682,2 Excitation Wavelength, nm 682,4 Fluorescence excitation spectrum of the red transitions in a LHC-II trimer. The inset show the red-most line on an enlarged scale. The experiments have been carried out at T2 K. Figure 6.23. 221 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants 0.02 cm 1, in good agreement with previous hole-burning experiments [27]. At T4.2 K the line width of these molecules should be determined by the exited state lifetime (t5.6 ns) which corresponds to a width of around 0.001 cm 1. Possibly the measured value is larger than this number because of spectral diffusion. Fig. 6.24 shows a larger scan range which not only includes the red-most trap states but also transitions of energetically higher lying Chl a molecules. We find two prominent bands around 677.5 and 678.5 nm which may be attributed to Chl a molecules. The linewidth of the most intense peak is around 17 GHz. This linewidth is most probably determined by energy transfer to the red-most Chl a molecules. The corresponding energy transfer time is around 30 ps in good agreement with previous ensemble measurements which find 10 ps as the slowest energy transfer time in the complex. In contrast to the light harvesting (LH2) complex of purple bacteria, [54] LHC-II shows narrow fluorescence emission lines. However although we used short acquisition times for LHC-II we were never able to measure faster than the spectral diffusion, in contrast to LH2 where it is possible to record excitation spectra with acquisition times faster than the typical time constant for spectral diffusion [19]. In contrast to glasses, proteins are know to have a certain ªcut-offº time t min for spectral diffusion below which no diffusion is measurable [60]. The value for t min depends on the immediate environment of the chromophore one looks at. Chromophores buried within the protein have less internal degrees of freedom in its environment and hence a larger t min [50]. The fact that t min is larger for LH2 than it is for LHC-II may be due to the fact that the Chl a molecule which is emitting light in LHC-II is exposed at the outside of the protein in contrast to LH2 where it is located in a double walled cylinder formed by the a-helices of the proteins [7]. Spectral jumps in LHC-II trimers G= 17 GHz 300 Ifl, Cts/s 222 200 100 677 678 679 680 681 682 Excitation Wavelength, nm Figure 6.24. Fluorescence excitation spectrum of a single LHC-II trimer with a large scan range. The inset shows the resonance line at 678.5 nm on an enlarged scale together with the linewidth G . Experiments were carried out at T2 K. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes occur in an uncorrelated fashion. This indicates that, for LHC-II protein chromophore interaction is more important than chromophore chromophore interaction. In conclusion, the experimental data so far provide various lines of evidence that the monomer subunits within the LHC-II trimer are rather uncoupled and that there are three emitting states per trimer and one per monomer with an emission wavelength of 681.3e0.1 nm. The width of those lines measured by fluorescence excitation spectroscopy is around 0.02 cm 1. Those spectra show a couple of lines of energetically higher lying Chl a molecules. It is appealing to combine polarization spectroscopy with fluorescence excitation spectroscopy which would one allow to determine the orientation of the transition dipole moment of these Chl molecules providing so far missing information about the orientation of Chl molecules in the LHC-II complex. 6.3.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on Photosystem I Pigment-Protein Complexes In the preceding paragraphs single molecule spectroscopy has been applied to investigate antenna complexes. In this section a complex containing a reaction center is discussed. PSI from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus was isolated as described previously [61]. Purified PSI trimers were diluted in buffer containing 20 mM Tricine, pH 7.5, 25 mM MgCl2 and 0.02 % (w/w) of detergent (b-DM, Sigma) to reach a final concentration of ca.10 6 M Chl. The detergent concentration was slightly above that which induces micelle formation to avoid PSI aggregation. For measurements, PSI containing buffer was diluted again (1/100) in a solution containing 1 % (w/w) PVA, 25 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM Na-ascorbate and spin-coated on a cover glass to obtain thin PSI-doped films. The low final PSI concentration allows the spatial selection of individual PSI trimers. Sample preparation and mounting was done in the dark. The experiments were carried out using a home-built beam scanning confocal microscope able to operate from 1.8 to 300 K. Figure 6.25 shows fluorescence images of single PSI complexes recorded at 17 and 236 K. Every bright spot corresponds to the fluorescence emission of a single PSI trimer. A drastic decrease in the fluorescence intensity with increasing temperature is visible. This strong temperature dependence of the fluorescence intensity was observed in ensemble experiments [32,62]. It is a signature of thermally activated uphill energy transfer from the low-energy Chl pool to the reaction center. At physiological temperature energy trapped by the red pool of Chl can be transferred to the reaction center part via thermally populated vibrational levels. At low temperature this channel is blocked, leading to a more intense fluorescence emission. The quenching behavior therefore contains information concerning the energy barrier between red pool pigments and P700. Analysis of temperature activated fluorescence quenching was performed for 15 aggregates. In Fig. 6.25 we also show results for two typical complexes. The fluorescence intensity decreases by an order of magnitude as the temperature is increased from 17 to 280 K. A simple Arhenius law has been used to fit the experimental data [62]. The activation 223 224 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants 17 K 236 K 158 K Complex 1 Complex 2 60 120 180 T, K Figure 6.25. Temperature dependence of single PSI fluorescence intensity. Upper part: confocal fluorescence images of single PSI isolated in PVA film. Images have been recorded at temperatures as indicated. Fluorescence intensity is decoded in gray scale. The excitation wavelength was 680 nm. Lower part: Fluorescence intensity of two single PSI trimers as a function of temperature. Experimental data have been fitted with an Arrhenius equation: (AB exp(-DE/kBT)) 1. The activation energies for the two complexes were 550 and 490 cm 1. energy derived from data on single PSI complexes is 500 cm 1. This value is slightly higher than that obtained using ensemble measurements (363 cm 1). The difference may be due to the method chosen. When dealing with single molecules we select those having sufficient fluorescence quantum yield to be capable of detection. These are aggregates, which may be characterized by a low rate of uphill energy transfer to the RC and hence a high energy gap between the red Chl pool and the RC. Classical measurements are the results of averaging over the whole molecular ensemble, also containing low-energy gap aggregates. The slight difference in activation energy for the two aggregates presented in Fig. 6.25 can be explained in terms of differences in P700 or/and pigment energy levels among the complexes. From hole burning data [63] it is known that the P700 absorption band is distributed over roughly 100 cm 1. This is of the order of the observed differences in DE in our single molecules. It is noticeable that single PSI fluorescence emission can be detected at room temperature regardless of the low fluorescence quantum yield. Photobleaching is one of the most important obstacles in single molecule spectroscopy under ambient conditions. The detection of single pigment protein complexes requires their strong illumination, resulting in a high population of the Chl triplet state. Fortunately quenching of Chl triplet states by carotenoids allows the detection of single photosynthetic units. In order to investigate bleaching dynamics 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes Figure 6.26. Evolution of the fluorescence spectrum from single PSI during photobleaching. Three consecutive roomtemperature spectra (1, 2 and 3) are vertically shifted for clarity. The acquisition time was 2 s. Note the step-wise changes in red-most fluorescence between spectra 2 and 3. The lowest panel shows the difference between spectra 2 and 3. The arrow indicates the filter cut-off. at room temperature we recorded a continuous series of spectra with short acquisition time. The three consecutive spectra presented in Fig. 6.26 show that photobleaching commences from the low-energy Chl pool. Note the marked difference between the red-pool intensity in spectra 2 and 3. Discrete jumps of red-pool fluorescence emission were observed. Bleaching is a photoinduced process and its efficiency characterizes the excited state population of the pigment pool. The higher photostability of bulk antennas (C680) as compared to the red pool may thus be caused by rapid depopulation of C680 excited states. The more rapid photodegradation of red Chls may be due to the existence of an efficient energy transfer from C680 to low-energy antennas and thus a high population probability of the red pool Chls. The high photostability of PSI at low temperature make them a good system for detailed spectroscopic study. In order to probe the spectroscopic properties of the low-energy antenna we recorded fluorescence excitation spectra of single PSI complexes. Therefore the excitation laser was scanned in the low-energy antenna region (705 720 nm). Fluorescence was detected at wavelengths longer than 725 nm. The spectra show narrow excitation lines (Fig. 6.27). The linewidth of the spectra (Z1 cm 1) recorded using a single fast laser sweep across the resonance was limited by our experimental resolution. Those lines may correspond to the zero-phonon transitions of individual Chl molecules. Significant line broadening was observed during multiple scan due to spectral diffusion. The number of the narrow Chl lines observed in the excitation spectra varies from aggregate to aggregate (typically we observed 1 2 lines in the region 705 715 nm, however for some aggregates up to 4 lines were visible). The quantitative analysis of the spectral pool composition is difficult because of the intense spectral diffusion. Spectral jumps of single chlorophylls may be caused by the rearrangement of the local pro- 225 Fluorescence Intensity, Cts/s 6.3 Single Molecule Spectroscopy on the Light-Harvesting Complex II of Higher Plants 60 30 712 713 Excitation Wavelength, nm Figure 6.27. Low-temperature fluorescence excitation spectra of the red-most antenna pigments. Main figure: A fluorescence excitation spectrum of a single PSI aggregate at 2 K. The spectrum was obtained summing 30 consecutive scans and detecting the fluorescence at wavelength larger than 725 nm. The background is limited by the dark count rate of the detector. Inset: Spectral distribution of single Chl zerophonon lines (spectral region between 705 and 717 nm has been studied). tein environment. Such processes may be a result of the optical excitation, because the emission of Stokes-shifted photons by Chl molecule is accompanied by heat dissipation in their local environment. The absence of a visible phonon structure in the excitation spectra is remarkable. This effect is related to the difference in absorption cross section in the zero-phonon line and phonon wing. Even when the major part of the total spectral intensity is concentrated in a phonon wing, the absorption cross-section of a pure electronic transition can be higher because its oscillator strength is concentrated in a narrow spectral interval. Upon tuning the laser to the maximum of the bulk Chl absorption band (680 nm), only emission from the red-most Chl is detected in low-temperature fluorescence emission spectra (see Fig. 6.28). Individual Chl lines resolved in fluorescence excitation spectra are also visible in fluorescence emission spectra (fine structure in the spectral region between 710 and 715 nm). The spectral positions of the observed lines vary from one aggregate to another (this effect Fluorescence Intensity, a. u. 226 T = 280 K 700 750 800 T = 1.8 K 700 720 740 760 780 Wavelength, nm Figure 6.28. A fluorescence emission spectrum of single PSI complexes at 2 K. The fine structure in the 712 nm region corresponds to 800 zero-phonon transitions of individual Chl molecules. 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes is related to differences in the local environment of pigments leading to an inhomogeneous broadening in ensemble experiments). Note that the single molecule approach provides the possibility of unraveling spectral fine structure using nonselective excitation. Close to the narrow emission lines of individual Chl molecules we observe a broad spectral band peaking at 730 nm (see Fig. 6.28). Since there are no intense Chl vibrations in the low-frequency domain we believe that the broad structure is related to a pigment protein system with strong electron phonon coupling. Two possible origins of the 730 nm band can be considered. First, the broad spectral band may be a phonon wing of the zerophonon line found in the 710 715 nm region of Fig. 6.27. Due to strong electron phonon coupling, a large Stokes shift may be associated with the low frequency phonon modes of the protein environment. Second, the 730 nm band corresponds to a different pigment site. Based on hole-burning studies of pigment protein complexes [37] we assume that the main phonon frequency responsible for the formation of a phonon wing is 16 cm 1. A large Stokes shift (300 cm 1) would require a Huang Rhys factor of the 712 nm state of about 20. Under these conditions the zero-phonon lines should not be observable because of an extremely low Franck Condon factor (exp (-20)). Based on the ensemble data [35] we can tentatively assign the two observed bands to the earlier reported C708 and C719 groups of pigments. We expect a ratio of the oscillator strength of about 5/6 for C708 and C719 Chl sites respectively. The high total intensity of the 730 nm band may be related to the difference in the triplet quenching efficiency between two pigment pools. Similar to LHCII, efficient triplet quenching is particularly important because of the high excitation rate in single molecule experiments. The strong quenching of the red-most state once again seems to be physiologically motivated because of the efficient energy transfer to the red-most state at room temperature. Hence two different Chls pools probably play a role in the formation of the long-wavelength antenna part of PSI. The absence of narrow zero-phonon lines in the red-most pool may be explained in terms of an intense spectral diffusion or/and strong coupling leading to low zero-phonon lines intensity. The efficiency of electron phonon coupling in pigment protein complexes depends on the change in permanent dipole moment (Dm) [64]. Recently available holeburning data on red pool Chls of PSI from Synechocystis show that Dm increases when the burn wavelength increase from 700 to 715 nm, leading to significant broadening of the hole spectra and disappearance of zero-phonon structure on the red edge of the PSI absorption band [37]. A charge-transfer character of excited antenna state can be associated with a strong electronexchange coupling between closely spaced Chl [65]. Unfortunately Stark-spectroscopy data are not available for Synechococcus elongatus and we can only speculate about the nature of the strong coupling in this system. Nevertheless our data suggest that the discussion concerning the excitonic nature of the lowenergy C714 state of Synechocystis (see ref. [37,66]) can be expanded to the red-most state of Synechococcus elongatus. 227 228 References Summarizing, the spectral analysis suggests that two antenna Chl pools are responsible for the red-most absorption of PSI from Synechococcus elongatus. The electronic transition of the 712 nm state is not strongly coupled to the phonon bath of the protein environment whereas electron phonon coupling of the redmost pool leads to a complete disappearance of the zero-phonon structure. Strong coupling may be associated with excitonic interaction between chlorophylls in the red-most pool. References 1. van Grondelle, R., Dekker, J. P., Gillbro, T., SundstroÈm, V. Biochim.Biophys.Acta 1187, 1 65 (1994). 2. Hoff, A. J., Deisenhofer, J. Phys.Rep. 287, 2 247 (1997). 3. Miller, K. R. Nature 300, 53 (1982). 4. Karrasch, S., Bullough, P. A., Ghosh, R. EMBO J. 14, 631 638 (1995). 5. Papiz, M. Z., Prince, S. M., Hawthornthwaite-Lawless, A. M., McDermott, G., Freer, A. A., Isaacs, N. W., Cogdell, R. J. Trends Plant Sci. 1, 198 206 (1996). 6. Hu, X., Damjanovic, A., Ritz, R., Schulten, K. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 95, 5935 5941 (1998). 7. McDermott, G., Prince, S. M., Freer, A. A., Hawthornthwaite-Lawless, A. M., Papiz, M. Z., Cogdell, R. J., Isaacs, N. W. Nature 374, 517 521 (1995). 8. Reddy, N. R. S., Small, G. J., Seibert, M., Picorel, R. Chem.Phys.Lett. 181, 391 399 (1991). 9. De Caro, C., Visscher, R., van Grondelle, R., Volker, S. J.Phys.Chem. 98, 10584 10590 (1994). 10. Monshouwer, R., Ortiz de Zarate, I., van Mourik, F., van Grondelle, R. Chem.Phys.Lett. 246, 341 346 (1995). 11. Kennis, J. T. M., Streltsov, A. M., Aartsma, T. J., Nozawa, T., Amesz, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 100, 2438 2442 (1996). 12. Wu, H.-M., Savikhin, S., Reddy, N. R. S., Jankowiak, R., Cogdell, R. J., Struve, W. S., Small, G. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 100, 12022 12033 (1996). 13. Chachisvilis, M., KuÈhn, O., Pullerits, T., SundstroÈm, V. J.Phys.Chem.B 101 , 7275-7283 (1997). 14. Jimenez, R., Dikshit, S. N., Bradford, S. E., Fleming, G. R. J.Phys.Chem. 100, 6825 6834 (1996). 15. Vulto, S. I. E., Kennis, J. T. M., Streltsov, A. M., Amesz, J., Aartsma, T. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 103, 878 883 (1999). 16. van Oijen, A. M., Ketelaars, M., KoÈhler, J., Aartsma, T. J., Schmidt, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 102, 9363 9366 (1998). 17. van Oijen, A. M., Ketelaars, M., KoÈhler, J., Aartsma, T. J., Schmidt, J. Science 285, 400 402 (1999). 18. van Oijen, A. M., Ketelaars, M., KoÈhler, J., Aartsma, T. J., Schmidt, J. Chem.Phys. 247, 53 60 (1999). 19. van Oijen, A. M., Ketelaars, M., KoÈhler, J., Aartsma, T. J., Schmidt, J. Biophys.J. 78, 1570 1577 (2000). 20. Ketelaars, M., van Oijen, A. M., Matsushita, M., KoÈhler, J., Schmidt, J., Aartsma, T. J. Biophys. J. 80, 1591±1603 (2001). 21. Matsushita, M., Ketelaars, M., van Oijen, A. M., KoÈhler, J., Aartsma, T. J., Schmidt, J. Biophys. J. 80, 1604±1614 (2001). 22. KuÈhlbrandt, W., Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 4, 519±528 (1994). 23. Gradinaru, C. C., Úzdemir, S., GuÈlen, D., van Stokkum, I. H., van Grondelle, R., van Amerongen, H. Biophys. J. 75, 3064 3077 (1988). 24. Kleima, F. J., Gradinaru, C. C., Calkoen, F., van Stokkum, I. H., van Grondelle, R. Biochemistry 36, 15262 (1997). 25. Peterman, E. J. G., Monshouwer, R., van Stokkum, I. H., van Grondelle, R., van Amerongen, H. Chem.Phys.Lett. 264, 279 284 (1997). 26. Trinkunas, G., Conelly, J. P., MuÈller, M. G., Valkunas, L., Holzwarth, A. R. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 7313 7320 (1997). 6 Spectroscopy of Individual Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes 27. Pieper, J., RaÈtsep, M., Jankowiak, R., Irrgang, K.-D., Voigt, J., Renger, G., Small, G. J. J.Phys.Chem.A 103, 2412 2421 (1999). 28. Reddy, N. R. S., van Amerongen, H., Kwa, S. L. S., van Grondelle, R., Small, G. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 98, 4729 4735 (1994). 29. Hemelrijk, P. W., Kwa, S. L. S., van Grondelle, R., Dekker, J. P. Biochim.Biophys.Acta 1098, 159 166 (1992). 30. Schubert, A., Voigt, B., Leupold, D., Beenken, W., Ehlert, J., Hoffmann, P., Lokstein, H. Biochim.Biophys.Acta 1321, 195 199 (1997). 31. Voigt, J., Renger, Th., SchoÈdel, R., SchroÈtter, T., Pieper, J., Redling, H. Phys.Status Solidi B 194, 333 (1995). 32. Palsson, L. O., Flemming, C., Gobets B., van Grondelle, R., Dekker, J. P., Schlodder, E. Biophys. J. 74, 2611 (1998). 33. Karapetyan, N. V., Holztwarth, A. R., RoÈnger, M. FEBS Lett. 460, 395 (1999). 34. Soukalis, V., Savikhin, S., Xu, W., Chitnis, P. R., Struve, W. S. Biophys. J. 76, 2711 (1999). 35. Palsson, L.-O., Dekker, J. P., Schlodder, E., Monshouwer, R., van Grondelle, R. Photosynth.Res. 48, 239 (1996). 36. Moerner, W. E. Ed. Persistent Spectral Hole Burning: Science and Applications, 44th edn.; Springer-Verlag: New York (1987). 37. RaÈtsep M., Johnson T. W., Chitnis P. R., Small G. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 104, 836 (2000). 38. Kennis, J. T. M., Streltsov, A. M., Permentier, H., Aartsma, T. J., Amesz, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 8369 8374 (1997). 39. LoÈsche, M., Feher, G., Okamura, Y. M. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 84, 7537 7541 (1987). 40. Struve, W. S. in Theory of Electronic Energy Transfer. eds. Blankenship, R. E., Madigan, M. T., Bauer, C. E. vol.15, pp.297 313 (1995). 41. SundstroÈm, V., Pullerits, T., van Grondelle, R. J.Phys.Chem.B 103, 2327 2346 (1999). 42. Sauer, K., Cogdell, R. J., Prince, S. M., Freer, A. A., Isaacs, N. W., Scheer, H. Photochem. Photobiol. 64, 564 576 (1996). 43. Alden, R. G., Johnson, E., Nagarajan, V., Parson, W. W., Law, C. J., Cogdell, R. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 4667 4680 (1997). 44. Kennis, J. T. M., Streltsov, A. M., Vulto, S. I. E., Aartsma, T. J., Nozawa, T., Amesz, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 7827 7834 (1997). 45. Bopp, M. A., Yiwei, J., Li, L., Cogdell, R. J. & Hochstrasser, R. M. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 94, 10630 10635 (1997). 46. Mostovoy, M. V., Knoester, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 104, 12355 12364 (2000). 47. Monshouwer, R., Abrahamsson, M., van Mourik, F., van Grondelle, R. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 7241 7248 (1997). 48. Freiberg, A., Timpmann, K., Ruus, R., Woodbury, N. W. J.Phys.Chem.B 103, 10032 10041 (1999). 49. Dracheva, T. V., Novoderezhkin, V. I., Razjivin, A. P. Photosynth.Res. 49, 269 276 (1996). 50. Hu, X., Ritz, T., Damjanovic, A., Schulten, K. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 3854 3871 (1997). 51. Wu, H.-M., Small, G. J. J.Phys.Chem.B 102, 888 898 (1998). 52. Scholes, G. D., Fleming, G. R. J.Phys.Chem.B 104, 1854 1868 (2000). 53. Bakalis, L. D., Knoester, J. J.Lumin. 87-89, 66 70 (2000). 54. Tietz, C., Chekhlov, O., DraÈbenstedt, A., Schuster, J., Wrachtrup, J. J.Phys.Chem.B 103, 6328 6333 (1999). 55. Sturgis, J. N., Robert, B. J.Phys.Chem.B 101, 7227 7231 (1997). 56. Bopp, M. A., Sytnik, A., Howard, T. D., Cogdell, R. J., Hochstrasser, R. M. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.USA 96, 11271 11276 (1999). 57. Krupa, Z., Huner, N. P. A., Williams, J. P., Maissan, E., James, D. R. Plant Physiol. 84, 19 24 (1987). 58. Nussberger, S., Dekker, J. P., KuÈhlbrandt, W., van Bolhuis, B. M., van Grondelle, R., van Amerongen, H. Biochemistry 33, 14775 14783 (1994). 59. KuÈhlbrandt, W., Wang, D. N., Fujiyoshi, Y. Nature 367, 614 621 (1994). 60. den Hartog, F. T. H., van Papendrecht, C., StoÈrkel, U. and VoÈlker, S. J. Phys. Chem. B, 103 1375±1380 (1999). 61. Fromme P., Witt H. T. Biochem.Biophys.Acta 175, 1365 (1998). 62. Tusov, V. B., Korvatovskii, B. N., Panchenko, V. Z., Rubin L. B. Dokl. Biophys. 252, 112 (1980). 63. Gillie, J. K., Lyle, P. A., Small, G. J., Golbeck, J. H. Photosynth.Res. 22, 233 (1989). 64. Small, G. J. Chem.Phys. 197, 239 (1995). 65. Beekman, L. M. P., Frese, R. N., Fowler, G. J. S., Picorel, R., Cogdell, R. J., van Stokkum, I. H. M., Hunter, C. N., van Grondelle, R. J. Phys. Chem. B , 101, 7293 (1997). 66. Melkozernov, A. N., Lin, S., Blankenship, R. E. J.Phys.Chem.B 104, 1651 (2000). 229
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz