Town of Apex, North Carolina Pavement Condition Survey Executive Summary – February 24, 2012 I. INTRODUCTION USI was retained by the Town of Apex in the spring of 2011 to perform a pavement condition survey (PCS) for the Town street system. USI identified approximately 119 miles of Town maintained asphalt roadway. A visual PCS of these streets was conducted by USI. These street segments were rated by driving each segment on a block to block basis and observing eight common pavement surface distresses and their corresponding severity levels. In addition, approximately 5.3 miles of “Warranty” Streets (streets that have not been taken over by the Town) and one Private Street were surveyed. II. PROCEDURES The procedures used for this survey included: • An inventory of the physical characteristics of selected segments of the municipality's streets. These characteristics include block number, length, number of lanes, width, type of pavement, location of sidewalk and curb and gutter existence per street segment side, asphalt height above gutter, and amount and type of speed humps. • Evaluation of the surface pavement distresses on selected street segments. Alligator cracking, block/transverse cracking, reflective cracking, rutting, raveling, bleeding, ride quality, and patching were measured according to well-defined severity levels. It should be noted that the rating system used for this survey was developed by NCDOT and ITRE back in 1983 and is still used by NCDOT and most North Carolina municipalities. • Entering and compilation of the collected field data and post processing information into a usable database management system. • Calculating a pavement condition rating (PCR) for each street segment and for the entire street system. The PCR for each street segment starts at 100 and is reduced by standard deduct values based on the amount and severity of the distresses present. • Recommending maintenance activities for each roadway segment based on the assessed condition. The costs for these maintenance activities were determined from current industry standard unit prices. III. • • • • • • • FINDINGS Apex’s overall PCR is 88.5. The North Carolina municipal average is 80.0. Apex’s streets are in “Good Condition”. 26% of the street system needs routine maintenance or resurfacing. 5.5 miles of streets or 4.6% of the rated system are recommended for resurfacing. 22,131 square yards of pavement require full depth patching. Apex has approximately $53 million in roadway assets. This is based on a pavement asset value of $31.00 per square yard. Apex PCS Executive Summary -1- USI of Carolina, Inc. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS • • • • • Apex has a current need of $1,564,891 to correct the pavement distresses that were detected at the time of the survey. o Additional costs of 25-40% can be incurred for drainage improvements, administration, milling, utility adjustments, work zone traffic control, and other items. In order for Apex to maintain an optimal 15 year paving cycle, USI recommends paving 8.0 miles of roads per year at a cost of $1,071,900 based on current asphalt prices. USI recommends that Apex dedicate its maintenance funding towards preventive maintenance practices and structural repair. o One such preventive maintenance practice is Crack Sealing; USI recommends crack sealing approximately 2.7 miles of streets. Maintaining an aggressive crack sealing, patching, and resurfacing program should be a high priority for the Town of Apex in tandem with allocating adequate funds and resources to accomplish this task. Ultimately, postponing recommended maintenance activities typically leads to pavement failures and subsequently costly major rehabilitation or reconstruction. As can be seen from the Typical Pavement Deterioration Curve below, spending $1 on pavement preservation prior to a pavement condition rating of roughly 60 will eliminate or delay spending $6 to $14 on rehabilitation or reconstruction at a later date. To be a good steward of the Town street system, it is prudent that preventative maintenance practices continue and that a sustained financial investment be made to maintain these roadway assets ($53 million). “There is no more fundamental transportation capital investment than system preservation – keeping existing infrastructure in good condition. If preservation investment is deferred, costs increase dramatically, leading to the saying ‘pay me now or pay me more – lots more – later.” - Washington Department of Transportation 2007 – 2026 Highway System Plan. Apex PCS Executive Summary -2- USI of Carolina, Inc. Town of Apex p 2011 Pavement Condition Survey Deliverables Meeting April 29, 29 2011 Steve Lander, PE Mike Marsh Deliverables 1. Report p 2. Appendices Distresses Street Listings 3. USI-TPA 4. Database 5. GIS 6. Compact Diskette Report Introduction 1. Apex maintains 119 miles of roads 2. USI finished the survey in April 2011 3 Data Collection 3. Eight common pavement surface distresses observed Additional attributes 4. Post data collection: PCR developed Maintenance activities are recommended Findings 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. PCR = 88.5 NC Municipality Average = 80 Street System is in “Good” condition PCR is above average 5.5 miles of streets or 4.6% of the rated system are recommended d d ffor resurfacing f i Findings 26% of street system needs maintenance or resurfacing 7. Full Depth Patching Required: 6 6. 22,131 square yards 17,055 square yards – Primary Maintenance Activity 5 076 square yards – Secondary Maintenance Activity 5,076 Recommendations Apex p has a current need of $1,564,891 , , $831,980 – Routine Maintenance $732.911 – Resurfacing g Additional Costs – 25% to 40% Raising g structures, milling, g admin., etc. 15 year paving cycle 8 miles p per yyear $1,071,900 per year Recommendations Crack Sealing g 2.7 miles – Primary Maintenance Activity 5.3 miles – Secondary Maintenance Activity USI recommends that Apex should dedicate its maintenance funding g towards p preventative maintenance practices and structural repair This practice will reduce the maintenance cost per mile in future years Proactive P ti vs. Reactive R ti P Pavementt Maintenance Program Roadway Assets AASHTO’s AASHTO’ Rough R hR Roads d Ah Ahead d USA Roadways - $1.75 Trillion 4,000,000 4 000 000 miles il off roadways d $437,500/mile Assuming A i an average pavementt width idth off 24’ Roadway Value ~ $31/SY Apex A streets t t – 1,712,650 1 712 650 square yards d Roadway assets – $53 million 2009 AASHTO Publication Data Collection – Pavement Distresses Alligator Cracking Reflective Cracking Block Cracking Raveling Data Collection – Pavement Distresses Rutting Bleeding Patching Ride Quality Data Collection – Additional Attributes Additional Attributes Sidewalk Curb and gutter Asphalt height above gutter Amount and types of speed humps Pavement Condition Predominant distresses of rated streets (% of total mileage): Alligator Cracking – 12% Block Cracking – 24% Raveling – 26% Priorities High Priority Crack sealing F ll d Full depth th patching t hi Short overlay Resurfacing of alligator cracking and rutting Priorities Medium Priority Resurfacing of severe: Block/transverse Bl k/t cracking ki Reflective cracking Ra eling Raveling Bleeding Priorities Low Priority Resurfacing of moderate: Block/transverse Bl k/t cracking ki Reflective cracking Ra eling Raveling Resurfacing of rough ride quality Resurfacing of moderate to severe: Patching Ride quality Priorities Basic Street Inventory Data Basic Street Inventory Data Figure 1 - Breakdown of Streets into PCR Categories 100 90 80 Percent of Syste em 70 69.5 60 50 40 30 20 13 9 13.9 10 8.2 3.9 4.5 0 Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor 91-100 81-90 66-80 51-65 0-50 Pavement Condition Rating 2011 Unit Costs Figure 2 - Distribution of Maintenance Needs by Primary Repair Type Percentage of Total Miles Total Miles: 118.90 Crack Seal, 2.3% Full-Depth Patch, 19.1% Short Overlay, 0.4% 1" PM Resurfacing, 2.9% 1" PM Resurfacing & Seal,1.6% No Repair, 73.6% Figure 3 - Distribution of Maintenance Costs by Primary Repair Type Percentage of Total Cost T t l Cost: Total C t $1,564,891 $1 564 891 1" PM Resurfacing, 25.1% 1" PM Resurfacing & Seal, 20.4% Short Overlay, 2.2% 2" PM Resurfacing, 1.3% Crack Seal, 1.7% Full-Depth Patch, 49.3% Street Listings USI TPA USI-TPA Questions and Answers
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz