ICPSR
Inter-university Consortium for
Political and Social Research
Canadian Federal Election Study, 1968
John Meisel
ICPSR 7009
This document was previously available in paper format only. It was converted to
Portable Document Format (PDF), with no manual editing, on the date below as part
of ICPSR's electronic document conversion project. The document may not be
completely searchable. No additional updating of this collection has been performed
(pagination, missing pages, etc.).
October 2001
ICPSR
Inter-university Consortium for
Political and Social Research
Canadian Federal Election Study, 1968
John Meisel
ICPSR
7009
1968 CANADIAN
FEDERAL
ELECTION
(ICPSR 7009)
Principal
Investigator
John Meisel
Queen's
Inter-University
Consortium
University
for
Political
and Social
P. 0. Box 1248
Ann Arbor,
Michigan
48106
Research
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
OF ASSISTANCE
All
manuscripts
Consortium
collector
should
utilizing
acknowledge
of the data.
data facilities
parentheses
that
fact
as well
The ICPSR Council
to follow
indicating
the individual
data made available
some adaptation
items
to be filled
through
the
as identify
urges all
of this
the original
users
of the ICPSR
statement
in appropriately
with
the
or deleted
by
user.
The data (and tabulations)
utilized
in this (publication)
were made available
(in part) by the Inter-University
Consortium for Political
and Social Research.
The data
for the 1968 Canadian Federal Election
were originally
collected
by John Meisel of Queen's University.
Neither
the original
collector
of the data nor the Consortium
bear any responsibility
for the analyses or interpretations
presented here.
In order
about
to provide
funding
the use of archival
information
about
indicate
resources,
manuscript
in the cover
research
is expected
or thesis
letter
abstract
which
with
essential
and to facilitate
ICPSR participants'
the ICPSR data facilities
completed
agencies
information
the exchange
activities,
to send two copies
to the Consortium.
data were used.
of
each user of
of each
Please
STUDY DESCRIPTION
Data for this study were obtained from a probability
cross-section
sample of 2,767 adults interviewed
following
the June 1968 federal
election.
There are 530 variables
in the dataset.
questions were asked about
Besides basic background information,
of the parties
and candidates,
reactions
to the election
outcome, evaluations
regional
conflicts
within
Canada and a wide variety
of issues that were
salient
during the campaign.
,
I
WPLE
Selection
1.
DESIGN 1968
of Constituencies
An index card was made up for
information:
a)
b)
c)
d)
each constituency
showing
the following
_-
Number of eligible
voters according
to the preliminary
Percent Liberal
vote in the .1965 election.
Whether the riding
was urban or rural.
Province.
lists.
.
The figures
for the number of eligible
voters
(before revision)
and
the 1965 Liberal
vote were supplied
by the Chief Electoral
Officer.
In a very few cases, the number of eligible
voters may be an estima
I
made by the local returning
officer
in the constituency
concerned
because voter enumeration
had not been completed at the time this
information
was compiled.
The calculation
of the 1965 vote according
to the new electoral
boundaries
-was made only for the purpose of ranking the parties
in each constituency
for the selecLion
of enumerators.
For this reason, no attempt was made to allocate
the armed forces
vote or the advance polls vote where the ranking was clear and, therefore,
the percentage
figures
may not be absolutely
correct
inasmuch
as these votes were distributed
differently
from the other
votes in
the riding.
It should be noted that the redistribution
of the 1965
vote led to some instances
in which it was possible
for voters
in a
part of a ,new constituency
to have voted for a party in 196.5 for,
which voters in another part of the new constituency
coclld not have
voted since there was no candidate.
Because the cases mostly
iwoive
minor parties
or independent
candidates
with only a small number of
the resulting
distortion
of the 1965 percentage
of the LiSeral
votes,
vote is very small.
..
.
-.
:
.
-. .
.'
:
*.
.
_
.
Constituencies
which were mostly contained
in a city of 100,003 or
more in the 1966 census were defined as urban.
Urban areas under
this definition
included:
Halifax
Quebec
Nontreal
Ottawa
Toronto
Hamilton
Htchener-Waterloo*
London
Windsor
Winnipeg
Regina
Saskatoon
Edmonton
Calgary
Vancouver
*These two cities
were considered
as one urban area.
:
. .
2.
Constituencies
were categorized
as: 1) accessible,
2) partly
accessible,
according
to the capacity
of Canadian
and 3) inaccessible,
Facts (the firm conducting
the interviews)
to reach respondents
residing
in them.
Each constituency
in category
(2) l?as divided
into
an accessible
and an inaccessible
parts.
For such constituencies
two
index cards were then made - one for each part,
containing
the same
information
as that listed
in section
1. It was assumed, when constituencies
were split,
that the 1968 eligible
voters
and 1965 Liberal
voters were distributed
geographically
within
each part in proportion
to the population
distribution
reported
in the 1961 census.
Constituencies
in category
(I), and those parts of constituencies
. category
(2) which were accessible,
comprise universe
A. The inaccessible
parts of constituencies
in category
(2) and the constituencies
in category
(3) comprise universe
B.
in
This seemingly
cumbersome method was devised to assure that a safe
attempt could be made to reach the invariably
neglected,
remote
portions
of Canada,
Since little
under seven per cent of Canada's
population
resides in inaccessible
places (description
and maps are
on file.at
Queen's University,
Canada), it was thought desirable
to
take extraordinary
measures to reach these 'remote'
respondents.
Canadian Facts being unable to do so at a reasonable
cost, students,
colleagues
and other willing
helpers were enlisted.
This effort
was,
however, uncertain,
since much depended on the goodwill
and ingenuity
of a variety
of laymen. It was therefore
decided to design
the sample so as to contain
an accurate reflection
of the accessible
regions,
and a more risky portion
which could be excluded rqithout
biasing
the considerably
larger
sample of the accessible
regions.
The larger,
A sample was thus conceived of as being cap1bl.e of
standing
on its ocm feet, with the only shortcoming
that it was 3ased
on about 93 per cent of the Canadian population.
Sazzple B, in the
remote areas, chosen according
to similar
principles,
was drawn from
regions
containing
the remaining
6.9 per cent of the adult population.
3.
Index
_ a)
b)
4
cards
in universe
A were stratified
as follows:
By province
from east to west, yielding
ten piles of index cards.
Each of these (provincial)
piles was then sorted into two piles
based on the urban rural
distinction,
yielding
20 piles ordered
as follows,
from east to-west:
URRUURR...
--where U is tile urban pile for a province
and R the rural pile.
Index cards witllin
each of these (twenty)
piles were next ordered
according
to the Liberal
percentar;e
of the vote in 1365 in alternating
fashion - first
from highest support to lowest,
and then
from lowest to highest.
Index cards in universe
B were then appended, having been ordered
according
to their
geographic
position,
from west to east.
only
.
125 cards were selected
4.
from universe
A and 14 from universe
B.
The 125 cards from universe
A were selected
in the following
manner:
The total
number of voters in universe
A was 10,211,400.
This total
was divided
by the number of cards to be selected
(125) to obtain
a selection
intervai
(81,691).
A random number (30,380)
between
zero and 81,691 was selected
as the start
value and cards containing the (30,380+81,691
n) th voter was selected
for n = 0, 1,
.
.
.
.
124.
2,
.
I
.
The 14 cards from universe
B were selected
as follows:
For n = 125,
the (30,380+81,691
n) th voter fell
in universe
B. The index card
containing
that voter was selected.
After that point a selection
interval
of 40,846 (81,691;
2) was used to pick 13 additional
index
cards.
No single
constituency
universe
B.
S..
A.
General
'1.
2.
from both
universe
A and
For the constituencies
selected
in universe
A, seven clusters
of 4
names were used and in those from universe
B, 2 clusters
of 7 names
were picked.
This gave us a total
of 3500 (125 x 28) interviews
to
be attempted
in universe
A and 196 (14 x 14) in universe
B.
.
.
was selected
. Selection
of Polling
Subdivisions
.
Procedure
The total
number of polling
subdivisions
in each constituency
(or
+rt
of constitLe>cy)
selected
in the above stnuer was ciiviZ<,1. by
the number of individual
voters
to be selected
from that constituency
B. Tne
- 28 in the case of universe
A, and 14 in the case of universe
resulting
nuinber uas rounded to the nearest integer
(I).
For each constituency
(or part) a random number (R) was then selected
From enumerators'
so that OC RLI.
accounts provided
by the Chief
Electoral
Officer
listing
the number of eligible
voters
in eacS
'polling
subdivision
according
to the Preliminary
Voters Lists,
the
polling
subdivisions
numbered R, R+I, R+21 . . . (and so on) were
Cumulative
totals
of the nunber of electors
in each of
selected.
those polls was calculated:
3
= NR
c2 = ci
c3 = c2
And so on
where h'R was the number of voters
subdivision.
Nmn
where N(R+I)
subdivision.
N(R+21)
...
in
the Rth polling
was the number of voters
in the
(R+I)th
I43
3.
For each constituency
(or part) the final
cumulative
total was
divided
by the number of polling
subdivisions
to be selected
seven for universe
A, and two for universe
B. The result
of this
computation
was then rounded to the nearest integer
(J) to obtain
the selection
interval
for polling
subdivisions.
A random number (>I) was selected
such that
subdivisions
for which Ci< >l + iJ C C
(ii-l)
B.
0 < Mf
for il
J. Polling
0 were selected.
Notes
1.
For iten A.2.
Depending upon the rounding
polling
subdivisions
could be selected
for
or 15 for universe
B.
for I ,some 27, 28 or 29
universe
A; and 13, 14
2.
For item A.3.
Depending upon the rounding
pollir?g
subdivisions
could be selected
for
or 3 for B.
for 3, some 6, 7 or 8
universe
A; and 1, 2
In fact,
in only two constituencies
(or parts)
In the-rest
either
7 or 2 were chosen.
3.
'4.
were 8 polls
selected,
In cases where a particular
poll had been divided
into two or more
parts for voting
purposes,
Ge several parts were considered
one
with voters
listed
in the order indicated
by the labelling
of the
parts.
For example, if 81A had 100 voters and 81B had 50 voters.,
voter no. 104 in the
voter no. 4 in 81B would be considered
aggregate unit.
from a constituency
because of canWherever polls xare eliminated
cellation,
combination
with another poll,
or because of inaccessibility
as defined
above, the numbering of the remaining
polls was
For example, if poll no. 81 in a constituency
revised.
having 100
polls was in the inaccessible
area, poll no. 82 would become poll
no. 81, no. 83 uould become 82 and so on.
Selection
of ?;ames
For each polling
subdivision
selected
as outlined
above, a random number
(greater
than zero and less than or equal to the number of eligible
voters in t:;e polls
according
to the preliminary
list)
was chosen. The
voter having this number was the first
person in the cluster.'
. From the first
voter every fourth name VJS chosen until
fcur names wcrc
In the case of polls where the voters were not listed
accotdobtained.
ing to street
address but by name, every fourth name having the same
If four names were not selected
in
street
or postal address was chosen.
name or postal
this way, it was assti:ed that th2 next mentioned street
address after
the first
name chosen was the nest stratum and so on for as
many strata
as were needed.
.
I51
NOTE:
relisti%
a)
b)
c)
-’
This
in
special
rethod
the foliouing
Choose firs:
Strata within
addresses in
List names in
for alphabetical
manner.
lists
is
equivalent
to
voter
poll then become the street
names or postal
order of mention after the first
n&e.
alphabetical
order within
strata.
-.
.
QUESTION 2 --
CARD 1,
Column 12
0 - No answer
1 - Pleased
2 - Pleased
3-
with
reservations
Upset
4 - Upset with
5 - Don't
qualifications
know
6 - Apathetic
or indifferent
7‘
Extremely
pleased
8-
Extremely
displeased
9 - Refused
to answer
Pleased
or Upset
Problems
QUESTION 4 (a) --
facing
the gbvernment
Card 1
..’ I.
:r
Column
No.
17
1
No particular
17
2
Refused
17
3
Medicare,
18
1
Other welfare,
19
1
Unemployment
20
1
Housing
21
1
Inflation/cost
22
1
Regional
23
1
Wheat sales
24
1
Youth
25
1
Quebec in Confederation,
26
1
Foreign
27
1
-.
Taxes .
28
1
Education
29
1
Problems
majority
30
1
Labour'
31
1
Other
32
1
Minority
33
1
Other
34
1
Farm problems
35
1
Other
problems
36
1
Don't
know
problem
to answer
including
hospitalization
including
child
welfare
of living
inequality
including
separatism
policy
::.<.
with political
government.
economic
groups
social
system,
including
problems,
including
(other
than French
poverty
Canadians)
policy
If respondent
mentions two problems falling
within
the same
column instead of 1. e.g.
category,
mark 2 in the appropriate
respondent
mentions two "other social
problems":
them mark col.
Code similarly
for cases of more than two mentions.
None
33-2.
because extra numbered
of this can be done in the case of medicare,
codes have already been used in col. 17, but there is not likely
to be more than one mention of this.
3
. )
’ ‘,
QUESTION 4 (b) and (c) -Most important
Card 1, ~01s.
cols.
01
_
and next
most important
37 - 38 most
39 - 40 next
Medicare
most
.
02
Other welfare,
including
child
03
Unemployment
04
Housing
05
Inflation,
cost
06
Regional
inequality
07
Wheat sales
08
Youth
09
Quebec in Confederation
10
Foreign
11
Taxes
12
Education
13
Problems with the political
system
(including
majprity
government)
14
Labour
15
Other
16
Minority
17
Other
18
Farm problems
19
Other
of living
policy
economic,
including
groups
social
policy
poverty
problems.
QUESTION 4 (a) and (f)
CARD 1, ~01s.
~01s.
42 - 43 - (e>
46 - 47 - (f)
08
09
10
11
12
13
No answer
Don't know
Taxes - reduce government expenditures
Taxes - improve economic conditions
Taxes - change method, revise structures
Taxes - unfocussed recommendation
1
unions and/or or their
leaders
Labour - regulate
labour situation
Labour - government control
statement
Labour - other anti-union
Labour - unfocussed recommendation
conditions
Labour - give workers fair wages, better
Labour - other
14
15
Other
Other
18
Education
19
20
Education
Education
21
22
23
24
Education
Education
Education
Education
26
27
28
Minority
Minority
Minority
31
32
33
34
Farm
Farm
Farm
Farm
36
37
38
39
+, Other
Other
Other
Other
00
01
02
03
04
06
economic
economic
-
40
41
42
43
Political
Political
Political
Political
46
47
Other
Other
problems
problems
- focussed recommendation
- unfocussed recommendation
- favourable
to public and secondary school
consolidation
to consolidation
- unfavourable
all levels
- greater access to education,
or any.level
on it
- reduce high government expenditures
education
- expand specialized
- other
- unfocussed recommendation
recommendation
- intolerant
receommendation
- tolerant
or unfocussed recommendation
- neutral
groups
groups
groups
higher prices for farmers
increased
subsidies
for farmers
other
unfocussed recommendation
social
social
social
social
-
against
government action
in favour of government action
neutral
re: government action
unfocussed or other
system
system
system
system
-
change structures
change behaviour
of officials,
change party system
other
.
- focussed recommendation
- unfocussed recommendation
politici
.ans
QUESTION 7 (b)
CARD 1, Cal.
MEDICARE
52
1
Should
have had it
2
Should have it
3
Plenty
4
Don't
need it
5
Other
approval
6
Other
disapproval
7
Other
ambivalent
8
Should
9
No opinion
0
No answer
long
now
of time
be based on need
ago
-
,
I
QUESTION 8 (b)
CARD 1, Col.
WELFARE
58
1
Enough is being
done
2
Too little
3
Too much is being
4
New approach
5
Ambivalent
6
Conditionally
7
Other
9
No opinion
0
No answer
is being
done
done
is needed
in favour
7
QUESTION 9 (b)
CARD 1,
Col.
ECONOMICPOLICIES
64'
1
Too little
has been done
2
About
3
Too much interference
4
Too little
5
Other
9
No opinion
0
No answer
the right
amount has'been
and too much
done
‘s.‘,
‘I
”
\
QUESTION 12 (a)
Cal.
CARD 2,
How should
30
1
Exactly
the same as the other
2
Special
position
3.
. c.. .. . .4
.
Quebec be treated?
Other
for
Quebec
hostile'response
extremely
Other hostile
provinces
response
5
Other
ambivalent
6
Other
sympathetic
7
Quebec should
8
Other
9
No opinion
0
No answer
(incl.
shouldn't
be a separate
confine
state
.
French
to Quebec)
QUESTIONS 17 and 18
Should a person
be punished?
CARD 2,
Cal.
Col.
Cols.
45 - if
46 - if
who breaks
the law
45 - 46
law is against
law is against
his religious
principles
other fundamental
principles
0
Refused
1
Should
2
Should
3
Depends on the offense
4.
Ambivalent
8
Other
9
No opinion
not
of his
QUESTION 20 (a)
CARD 2,
52
53
77
78
(first
(second
(third
(fourth
mention)
mention)
mention)
mention)
0
Don't
know, no answer
1.
Nothing
- pas grand
2
Contact
MP
3
Contact
representative
4
Contact
other
5
Contact
PM
6
Contact
Minister
7
Contact
mass media
8
Petition
or direct
9
Other
chose
(unspecified)
citizens
in charge
Committee
Person
action
or referendum
QUESTION 20 (b)
CARD 2, Cols.
54 - 55
20
21
No answer
Nothing
Contact HP
Contact representative
Contact other citizens
Contact PM
Contact Minister,
committee,
etc. in charge
Contact mass media
Petition
or direct
action
Other ar unspecified
MP plus other citizens
Ml? plus PM
MP and Minister
MP and mass media
MP and petition
or direct
action or referendum
MP and other
Representative
and other citizens
Representative
and PM
Representative
and Minister
Representative
and Media
Representative
and direct
action or petition
Representative
and other
22
23
24
25
26
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
27
28
29
30
PM and
PM and
PM and
PM and
31
32
33
Minister
Minister
Minister
34
35
36
37
Media and petition
Media and other
Petition
and other
Other and other
38
39
40
Three mentions
Four mentions or more
Can't remember
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
citizens
citizens
citizens
citizens
citizens
and
and
and
and
and
PM
Minister
media
petition
other
Minister
media
petition
other
and media
and petition
and other
or direct
or direct
action
action
QUESTION 20 (c)
What organization
do you belong
oppose a bill
in Parliament?
CARD 2, Cols.
to through
which
56, 57, and also 79
(for the total
number of groups
00
Not specified
01
No (none)
02
Don't
03
Trade Union
04
Business
05.
Other
06
Fraternal
07
Service
08
Charitable
09
National
10
Sport
11
Entertainment
12
Religious
13
Church
14
Boy Scouts,
15
Credit
16
Regimental
17
Political
18
Non-partisan
19
Other
you could
mentioned)
know
organization
or professional
occupational
group
(e.g.
farm group)
group
club
or health
organization
or social
(Knights
groups,
of Columbus,
parish
Girl
unions,
Orange Order)
groups
Guides
co-ops
or veterans'
group
party
political.group
(including
In column 79
0
No groups
mentioned:
1
Belongs
to one
2
Belongs
to two
8
Eight
9
Not specified
or more
belonged
to none
pressure
groups)
13
QUESTION 21 (a)
Different
CARD 2,
groups
Cols.
or individuals
treated
differently
58 - 63
Which groups or individuals
mention)
Cols. 58 - 59 (first
61
(second
mention)
Cols. 60 00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 -
Don't know, no answer
No, none
Rich
Poor
Different
regions of Canada
Young
More mature, adults
Ethnic or religious
groups
Police,
magistrates,
local officals
social
outcasts,
protesters
Hippies,
Drunkards
people
Important
people, well-known
The ordinary
man
Less educated
More educated
People with connections
Politicians
French-Canadians
La pOgre
Not specified
Other
How are they
CARD 2,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Cols.
treated
differently?
62 - 63
Law is applied differently
Law or sentence has a different
impact
Receive favoured treatment
Receive harsher treatment
Cannot defend themselves as well
Can defend themselves better
Other
Don't know or no answer
Vague reasons,
such as "by their wealth"
by the courts?
QUESTION 21 (b)
Different
CARD 2,
people
Cols.
treated
differently
by the police?
64 - 69
Which groups are treated
differently
Cols. 64 - 65 (first
mention)
Cols. 66 - 67 (second mention)
01
Same as 20 (a)
~01s.
58 - 59 and 61 - 62
20
How treated
Cal.
Col.
differently
68 (first
mention)
69 (second mention)
Same as 20 (a)
~01s.
60 and 63
QUESTION 31 (d)
When changed from feeling
to another?
CARD 3,
Cal.
closer
to one party
,.
14
0
Don't
know, no answer,
1
1957 or earlier
2
1958 - 59
3
1960 - 61
4
1962 - 63
5
1964 - 65
6
1966 - 67
7
1968
8
General,
long
9
General,
recently
ago
not
specified
to feeling
...,._':
closer
QUESTION 31 (e)
Why Changed party?
CARD 3,
. .
'.
cols,
15, 16
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
No answer
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
of Liberal
leader
of Liberal
leader
of Conservative
leader
of Conservative
leader
of NDP leader
of hDP leader
of other party leader
of other party leader
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
of Liberal
candidate
of Liberal
candidate
of Conservative
candidate
of Conservative
candidate
of NDP candidate
of ND? candidate
of other candidate
of other candidate
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
of specific
of specific
of specific
of specific
of specific
of specific
of specific
of specific
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
Approval
Disapproval
of general
Liberal
policies
of general
Liberal
policies
of general
Conservative
policies
of general
Conservative
policies
of general
NDP policies
of general
NDP policies
of general
policies
of another party
of general
policies
of another
party
33
34
35
36
37
38
Positive
response
to a provincial
factor
Negative
response to a provincial
factor
Personal
reasons
Other reasons
Don?t know - pas de raison
speciale
Response to a provincial
factor,
attitude
.
40
41
42
43
44
Vague reasons,
"for a change",
Leadership,
unspecified
unspecified
Candidates,
"The man"
Policy,
unspecified
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Favourable
Unfavourable
Favourahle
Unfavourable
Favourable
Unfavourable
Favourable
Unfavourable
(incl.
has
Favourablc
unfavourable
53
54
Liberal
policy
Liberal
policy
Conservative
policy
Conservative
policy
NDP policy
NDP policy
policy
of another party
policy
of another
party
"everything
unspecified
in general"
assessment
of Liberal
performance
assessment
of Liberal
performance
assessment
of Conservative
performance
assessment
of Conservative
performance
assessment
of NDP performance
assessment
of KUP performance
assessment
of Social Credit
performance
assessment
of Social Credit
performance
no chance nationally)
assessment
of performance
of another
party
assessment
of performance
of another
party
Question 33 (d)
Card 3, col. 24
Code as for 31 (d)
Question 33 (e)
Card 3, Cols. 25-26
Code as for 31 (e)
Question 34 (h)
Card 3, Col. 37
Code as for 31 (d)
Question 34 (i)
Card 3, Cols. 38-39
Code as for 31 (e)
Question 34 (1)
Card 3, Col. 42
Code as for 31 (d)
Question 34 (m)
Card 3, Cols. 43-44
Code as for 31 (e)
QUESTION 37 (g)
What have you read or heard
in your riding?
CARD 3,
Cols.
How heard
Col.
Col.
about
the successful
47 - 52
47 (first
mention)
48 (second mention)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Did not hear
Radio
Television
Newspaper
Campaign Literature
Speeches read or heard
Personal contact with the candidate
Candidate's
own articles,
reports
Other
Not specified
What heard
Cal.
Cal.
49 - 50 (first
mention)
51 - 52 (second mention)
00
01
02
03
04
05 06
07
08
09
Can't remember
Specific
personal
Specific
personal
Specific
personal
Specific
political
Specific
political
Specific
political
Specific
unspecified
Specific
unspecified
Specific
unspecified
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
General
General
General
General
General
General
General
General
General
personal
favourable
personal unfavourable
personal neutral
political
favourable
political
unfavourable
political'neutral
unspecified
favourable
unspecified
unfavourable
unspecified
neutral
21
22
23
24
2.5
26
27
28
29
Between
Between
Between
Between
Between
Between
Between
Between
Between
personal
personal
personal
political
political
political
unsvecified
unspecified
unspecified
30
No response
favourable
unfavourable
neutral
favourable
unfavourable
neutral
favourable
unfavourable
neutral
favourable
unfavourable
neutral
favo:lrable
unfavourable
neutral
favourable
unfavourable
neutral
candidate
QUESTIONS 35, 36, 37 (a),
CARD 4,
Cols.
How many items
9 - 18,
40
19 - 30
out of the total
did
the respondent
know?
COIS. 9 - ia
Cols.
col.
col.
col.
col.
9,
11,
13,
15,
17,
10
12
14
16
18
-
names
party
heard
occupation
religion
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Does not know
Knows about 0
Knows about 0
Knows about 0
Knows about 0
Knows about 0
Knows about 0
about
of the
of the
of the
of the
of the
of the
the 1 candidate
running
2 candidates
running
3
4
5
6
7
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
about
about
about
about
about
about
about
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
candidate
of the 2
of the 3
of the 4
of the 5
of the 6
of the 7
32
33
34
35
36
37
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
2
2
2
2
2
2
of
of
of
of
of
of
the
the
the
the
the
the
2 running
3
4
5
6
7
43
44
45
46
47
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
3
3
3
3
3
of
of
of
of
of
the
the
the
the
the
3
4
5
6
7
54
55
56
57
Knows
Knows
Knows
Knows
4
4
4
4
of
of
of
of
the
the
the
the
4
5
6
7
65
66
67
Knows 5 of the 5
Knows 5 of the 6
Knows 5 of the 7
76
77
Knows 6 of the 6
Knows 6 of the 7
87
Knows 7 of the 7
running
QUESTIONS
35,
Cal.
19 - 30
Cal.
Cal.
Col.
Col.
Col.
Col.
19
21
23
25
27
29
-
20
22
24
26
28
30
36,
38
(a>,
40
What respondent
-
knows about
the candidate
of each party?
Liberal
Conservative
New Democratic Party
Ralliement
des Creditistes
Social Credit
Other
10
Doe not know at all
11
12
13
14
15
Name
Party
Heard or read
Religion
Occupation
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Name and party
Name and heard
Name and religion
Name and occupation
Party and heard
Party and religion
Party and occupation
Heard and religion
Heard and occupation
Religion
and occupation
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Name and party and heard
Name and party and religion
Name and party and occupation
Name and heard and religion
Name and heard and occupation
Name and religion
and occupation
Party and heard and religion
Party and heard and occupation
Party and religion
and occupation
Heard and religion
and occupation
36
37
38
39
40
41
Name
Name
Name
Name
Party
Name
and party
and party
and party
and heard
and heard
and party
and heard and religion
and heard and occupation
and religion
and occupation
and religion
and occupation
and religion
and occupation
and religion
and occupation
and heard
or read
QUESTION 38 (a)
Has winning
CARD 3,
candidate
Col.
in riding
53
1
Yes (correct)
2
Yes (incorrect)
3
No (correct>
4
No (incorrect)
5
Don't
know
been in Parliament
before?
QUESTION 38 (c)
What did
before?
the candidate
CARD 3,
c01.5.. 54 - 59
Cols.
. Cols.
Cols.
do for
the riding
when he was in Parliament
54 - 55 (first
mention)
56 - 57 (second mention)
58 - 59 (third
mention)
00
No answer
01
Don't
02
Did nothing
03
Helped
04
Helped with
05
Helped
individuals
06
Helped
the area
07
Did work on non-local
issues
08
Provided
government
09
Worked for
10
Other
remember
certain
ethnic
public
liaison
certain
groups
works
with
for
economic
(e.g.
Indians,
the area
bureaucracy
groups
Eskimos)
.
’ .
.
’
QUESTION 38 (e)
What did
the member do for
CARD 3,
cols.
you,
if
in Parliament
before?
60 - 61
00
No answer
01
Did nothing
02
Sent Christmas
03
Helped
04
Provided
10
Other
Card or personal
mail
personally
liaison
with
government
bureaucracy
QUESTION 47
Why voted
as did
CARD 4, Cols.
Cols.
Cols.
Cols.
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
in June 1968?
41 - 46
41-42
43-44
45-46
(first
mention)
(second mention)
(third
mention)
No answer
Policy,
general
Policy,
fderal provincial
Policy,
French-English
Policy,
French-English
Policy,
French-English
Policy,
French-English
Policy,
French-English
(general)
relations
relations
relations
relations
relations
-
economic
Policy,
Policy,
other
Leader, age
Leader, French-English
position
Leader, general
Leader, other
Local candidate,
general
Local candidate,
like
Local candidate,
dislike
Local candidate,
none for preferred
general
R anti-English
R anti-French
R pro-English
R pro-French
party
Family agreement
Picking
the winner (incl.
wanted majority)
Party loyalty
Pour faire un changement, assez des vieux partis
"The man"
Unspecified
favourable
(thought
it would be better)
Unspecified
unfavourable
Diefenbaker,
pro or con
Other
No special
reason, aucune raison
Party
QUESTION 48 (a)
When did you decide
CARD 4,
0
w., ,I -
_ _..
-
Cols. 47 - 48
Col. 47 - time
Don't know, no answer
Long time ago, already decided
Before campaign (before April
23)
Early campaign (as soon as campaign started
2 months
(before election)
Mid-campaign
(6 weeks before election,
up to 2 weeks
(before)
Late campaign (1 week before,
last few days, June 25)
Other
Durant la campagne, non sp5cifi.Z
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Col.
to vote?
48
related
to an incident
Don't know, no answer
At time of conventions
When leader(s)
nominated
When local candidates
selected
When policy,
programme chosen or announced
When found out "who was running"
After TV debate
After campaign events assessed
Other
‘,
26
QUESTION 48 (c)
Why not an easy decision?
CARD 4,
Cols. 49 - 5x,.Col. M-49-first
mention
Col. 50-51-second
mention
so
"f::. ;- S Z
01
Was easy
02
Don't
03
Lack of information
04
Too complicated,
66
Difficulty
07
Preferred
08
Breaking
09
General
10
Would like
11
Leader
effect,
pro Trudeau
12
Leader
effect,
pro Stanfield
13
Leader
effect,
anti
Trudeau
14
Leader
effect,
anti
Stanfield
15
Leader
effect
16
Leader
effect,
17
Local
candidate,
like
18
Local
candidate,
dislike
21
Other
know, no answer
re:
parties,
leaders
not knowledgeable
of assessing
party
party
policies
ran no candidate
from long-term
uncertainty
party
about
preferences
to see NDP survive
ambivalent
other
loyalty,
past
voting
patter]
QUESTION 51
Reasons for
CARD 5,
Col.
Col.
Col.
Cal.
Col.
Col.
56
57
58
59
60
61
changing
Col.
-
vote
between
1965 and 1968?
56 - 61
Liberal
Conservative
NDP
Social Credit
Other party
Other
0
Don't
1
Leader,
favourable
2
Leader,
unfavourable
3
Candidate,
favourable
4
Candidate,
unfavourable
5
Specific
policy,
favourable
6
Specific
policy,
unfavourable
7
General
policy
or ideology,
favourable
General
policy
or ideology,
unfavourable
8
9
-
Other
know, no answer,
don't
remember
QUESTION 58
What did
you like
CARD 6, Cols.
CARD 4, Cols.
CARD 3, Cols.
best
Like
least
Like
most about
Like
least
Like
best
Like
least
Like
best
Like
least
about
two
columns
for
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(least)
about.....
9 - 40
63 - 78
62 - 77
Like
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
best
about
about
about
about
about
about
Trudeau
Trudeau
Stanfield
Stanfield
Douglas
Douglas
Caouette
Caouette
each mention;
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
6,
4,
6,
4,
6,
4,
6,
4,
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
9 - 12
63 - 66
13 - 16
67- 70
17 - 20
71 - 74
21 - 24
75 - 78
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
Card
6,
3,
6,
3,
6,
3,
6,
3,
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
~01s.
25
62
29
66
33
70
37
74
four
mentions
-
,28
65
32
69
36
73
40
77
can be recorded
can't remember
Don't know, no answer, indifferent,
Everything
Nothing
His party
His ethnic
or religious
ties
Don't know him enough to say
Language barrier
(-) or bilingualism
(‘)
(e.g.
I couldn't
understand
him because he spoke French,
or he speaks both languages)
Nothing
in particular
His regional
ties.
Talks too much
Personality,
general
unspecified
Marital
status
(incl.
"family
man")
sincerity,
frankness
(or lack)
Honesty,
Experience
or achievements
(or lack)
Appearance,
dress (incl.
"his smile,
his curls")
Warmth, understanding,
interest
in people,
coldness,
"he's insulting"
remoteness,
"il
est bgte",
"he's one of us"
Simplicity,
Intelligence,
shrewdness,
capability,
competence
Courage
enthusiasm,
dynamism (or lack)
Energy, vigor,
Decisiveness
(or lack)
Lack of aggressiveness
Age
Dignity,
seriousness,
maturity
(or lack)
Reliability,
responsibility
(or lack)
Independence
Humility
( ) arrogance
( )
Commitment,
concern (or lack)
manner
Easy "cool"
Is/ is not a "real"
Canadian a "good" Canadian
Comical behaviour,
is amusing, ridicule
Sense of Humour
strength
of character
(or lack)
Firmness,
Knowledge,
education
mostcry of the English
language
Parlc bien franqais:
reserved
manner
Quiet,
mild,
Swinger,
plnyhoy
type, Don Juan, sportif
hutoritaire,
dict;lteur,dcspote
Other personal
chnrnctcristics
Continncd
on next
pago.....
Question
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
80
81
as
58
Ideas, policies,
general or unspecified
Modernity,
progressiveness
( > or lack ( )
or old fashioned
( >
Radicalism
(incl.
"is a socialist"
- pejorative)
fanatic
Conservatism
Realism, or lack
Well thought out ideas
to French-Canadian
nationalism
or Quebec
Stand - sympathetic
Stand - unsympathetic
to French-Canadian
nationalism
or Quebec
Stand on Canadian unity,
not specified,
or on bilingualism
For the working:manjrtne
average man
For the farmer
Economic policies
(incl.
housing,
taxes, unemployment but not poverty)
Respect ou manque de respect pour les canadiens-franqais;
For unions,
labor
Bill
omnibus
Policies
on poverty,
poor area
Policies
on medicare,
other welfare
Other policies
Campaign style,
general or unspecified
Speaking ability
or manner
Promises that he made
Refusal to make promises
rabble-rousing,
playing
on emotions
Agitation,
Ability
to arouse interet,
excitment
(or lack)
Said what he was going to do ( ) programme trop vague ( )
behaviour
with women
the "kissing
bit",
Sa presence Zla St. Jean Baptiste
Other elements of campaign style
Political
skills
and leadership
ability
(or lack)
Chances on political
success
Too critical
of other parties,
leaders:
"mud slugger"
Performance on television
Presentation
of issues (confused issues,
red herring,
oversimplified)
Other likes or dislikes
References to activities
the election.
ot attitudes
or behaviour
since
30
QUESTION 63
How do you think
CARD 6,
Cols.
of yourself?
68znd 72 - 73
Col. 68 - basic code
~01s. 72-73 - specifications
Cal.
English-Canadian
French-Canadian
Simply Canadian
Ethnic Canadian
QuQbecois
Canadien
Other
9
No opinion
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
4 and 7 of the basic
68
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Cols.
for
72 - 73
English
French
Scottish
Irish
German
Ukrainian
Italian
Netherland
Polish
Native Canadian and Eskimo
Jewish
Other British
Isles
Norwegian
Hungarian
Russian
Swedish
Asiatic
Other
Newfoundlander
Nova Scotian
code
,I’
;
,
QUESTION 67 (d)
CARD 7,
00
01
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
15
16
18
.
Cols.
32 - 35
Cols.
Cols.
mention
32 - 33 - first
34 - 35 - second mention
.
No answer
,Don't know
Nothing can be done
Prevent the issue
anti-Quebec
or anti-French
Let Quebec go, strongly
or anti-French
Let Quebec go, midly anti-Ouebec
Let Quebec go, neutral
Let Quebec go, pro Quebec or pro French
Consult other Canadians,
take a vote
Work out a compromise
violence
Make Quebec stay, any way including
Make Quebec stay, persuasion,
non-violent
means
Make Quebec stay, unspecified
Other
Canceller,
annuler,
bloquer le vote
Ottawa should mind its own business
QUESTION 92 (a)
CARD 8,
Cols.
(b)
34 - 65
Under each column:
1 234 5 -
not a member
very active
fairly
active
inactive
no reply re: that
Where degree
"very active"
organization
of activeness
and "inactive".
is not
indicated,
code,
alternately,
R
34
35
36
37
38
39
Spouse
50
51
52
53
54
55
Organization
Trade union
associaticn
Business or professional
group (e.g. farm)
Other occupational
Fraternal
Service club
Charitable
and health
(Red CROSS, C-F.)
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 47
48
49
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
National
Sport and social
Entertainment
Religious
Church or parish group
Boy scouts/Girl
Guides
Credit union, co-op
Regimental
or veterans'
group
All other
Total number of organizations
spouse.
In columns
O- Ylcne
lone
2 - two
49 and 65, indicating
etc.
9 - nine
or more
the total
for
number of organizations:
R or
QUESTION 96 (a)
CARD 8, Cols.
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
.
(b)
69 - 70
No answer
Don't remember
Don't know
Yes (incorrect)
Yes (generally
correct)
no comment about Trudeau/separatists
Yes (correct)
pro Trudeau interpretation
Yes (correct)
anti-Trudeau
interpretation
Yes (correct)
mentions Trudeau but neutral
Yes (correct)
no mention of Trudeau pro French-Canadian
Yes (correct)
no mention of Trudeau anti French-Canadian
Yes (correct)
no mention of Trudeau, mention of
nationalists,
but no value'judgment
Yes (correct)
mention of separatists
against Trudeau no judgment
Yes (correct)
mention of spearatists
vs Trudeau plus
pro Trudeau interpretation
Yes (correct)
mention of separatists
vs Trudeau, antiTrudeau interpretation
Yes (correct)
mention of separatists
vs Trudeau
ambivalent
interpretation
Other
QUESTION 96 (c)
How events
CARD 8,
in Montreal
Col.
influenced
vote?
71 - 72
00
No answer
01
Did not influence
02
Don't
03
Pro Trudeau
04
Anti-Trudeau
05
Anti-separatist
and anti-Trudeau
06
Anti-separatist
and pro-Trudeau
07
Anti-French-Canadian
08
Pro-separatist
09
Pro-separatist
and pro-Trudeau
10
Pro-separatist
and anti-Trudeau
21
Other
vote
know
nationalist
CARD 1, (p.
4) Cols.
67 - 78
number of mentions
Total
of Trudeau
and Stanfield
Col.
Cal.
Col.
67 - total
68 - total
69 - total
Cal.
70 - total number of mentions of Trudeau in connection
with policy,
party,
etc. (e.g. liked Trudeau's
party)
- favourable
number of policy-party
mentions of Trudeau 71 - total
unfavourable
party-policy
mentions - neutral
72 - total
73 - total
favourable
to Stanfield
to Stanfield
74 - total unfavourable
neutral
75 - total mentions of Stanfield,
Cal.
Col.
Cal.
Cal.
Cal.
number of mentions favourable
to Trudeau
mentions unfavourable
to Trudeau
number of neutral
mentions of Trudeau
76 - Mentions of Stanfield
fsvourable
77 - Mentions of Stanfield
unfavourable
78 - Mentions of Stanfield
neutral
Col.
Cal.
Col.
Within
connected
with
policy
etc.
-
connected
with
policy
etc.
-
connected
with
policy
etc.
-
-
each column:
O- none
lone
- .
etc
9-
nine
or more
[In cases where Trudeau is the local candidate,
answers to the questions
on page 13 as mentions
these as mentions of the local candidate]
do not count
of Trudeau.
the
Regard
._.-.
_- . . . ,D
.. .
-.
. _ .7 - _..--._.
.
9
‘. -- .-_.
i
.~..:-”
27 )
..
LO
- --. L - _ .__._
._
.sf,79
._
___
.. . _ ....
..
ll
LO/77
.-
-_
:
l-0
I
z
3
._-._.-.- .y- - . .r
G:
__ -.
- --.
-
_-... ._. .
._
_..... .
- -.._ -. ._
-.-... . .
-. . . .
_
;
-
. ._. .
-
.
_ ..
..-
_-
_- -
_
.
. -
. .
_
-.
.
_._
.. .
--
..__-_-. - - -.._
.-
..._..
- .
_ _
.__ -.
__
.
_.
-_
ti?-LiL 01 C8
---
::-,
i7
i
&
I ?
,. ..-I*
. . . ‘7,.
-.--___.
‘>..C,.
-
,I-
P’/(.,.
”
.:/.,/
.
A.Ln:i
/fi
liL$:I-
,J.i;L;
#
z
/.:(
,,..,
,? .),.. A
!.. *xc
.3LCL.,,L
gd”
h
t
,
+
-p<-/
_ /.
. Were you surprised
last
June's
,T,‘.’
.
.’
r-4
by the results
of
election?
YES
.
.-L .
(POINT TO FIRST SCALE ON PAGE.OKE OF FKITE SEE&)
Leaving
the election
aside for a minute,
would
are very satisfied,
fairly
satisfied,
a little
dissatisfied
with:
3.
-a)
f,
.
I
1.
I,,’
/f&4
-b)
so far?
1
And what about the educational
opportunities
in general
you are ver:j satisfied,
fairly
guite
dissatisfied
with them?
-c)
What about
-d)
And what about
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ii-i
NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . .
3 4 q,w
you say that
dissatisfied,
in general
or quite
you
Your life
the way Canada is
your
prospects
run?
for
the future?
VERY
SATISFIED
fed)
you have had? Would you say that
satisfied,
a little
dissatisfied
or
FAIRLY
SATISFIED
A LITTLE
DISSATISFIED
QUITE
DISSATISFIED
-a)
YOUR LIFE SO FAR? . . . . . . . .
13-l
... .. .
2
......
3 ..... 4
-b)
TKE EDUCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES YOU
FIAVEHAD? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14-1
......
2
......
3
-c)
THE lriizY CANADA IS RUN'? . . .
15-l
. .....
2
.. . . . . .
3 '.....
-d)
YOUR PROSPECTS FOR TKE
FUTURE?* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16-1
.. ....
2 ......
Just how strcqly
would you say you feel
about (EXZ FRO3LZX): are you extre?.oly
or just concermd
fairly
vorricd,
worried,
about it?
.
.
NO
OPINION
.....
5
fyi
i
6
6
. . . . . 4.....5
4
.....
5'
6
3 . .... 4
.. ...
5
6
EXTREZXY VOXUED . . . . . . . 41-1
FAIRLY WOi-.I<IED. . . . . . . . . . . . .
JGST CO:X7:“D
Y ..I&. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'I
WN ' T ICNO'V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
. . 45-l
f?.+
-??.A.
5
2
:::::
.....
3
4
5
-.
5.
6.
Not all of Conada's prob1cr.r: arc, as you
know, handled by the. Federal Government
in Ottawa.
Which government would you
problems
say handles the most ignortrint
facing Canada today: the Federal Government in Ottawa, the Provincial
Covern'ments or the local authorities
here in
? (RAKE SyiLLEST UNIT)
As far as you are concerned personally,
which government is most important in
affecting
how I'OU and your fanilg get
on: the one in Ottawa, the one in this
province or your local government?
FEpr~’
LAL
(yy~F.T’~
.u
Y
,*.lLi4
. . . . . . . . . .
. .
49-l
PROVINCIAL COVERlKENTS. . . . . . . . . . .
LOCAL AIJTIIORITIES~................
OTRER (SPECIFY)
NO OPIXION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..o....
gf&n.a.
2
3
y/3 (dLL%)
9
0
FEDERAL GOVERNMEW. . . . . . . . . . . . 50-l
PROVINCIAL GO'KEPJWWI . . . . . . . . . . . 2
LOCAL AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . ..e..
/.,
OTHER (SPECIFY)
y; (be
NO OPINION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..i....
9
0
ti4
'.
.
.
As you
how, people decide what to do in an election
for all sorts of reasons.
ask you about several of them, but right now we wouid like to hear
your vie%!s on some of the issues which have been discussed in Canada in recent
years.
No one is interested
in all issues.
If I mention any in which you
are not too interested,
please SFSO.
It is as important to us to find out
whatxe
issues are that people do&
care about as the&ones they consider
very important.
Take Medicare for example:
7.
We shall
-a)
In deciding what to do about voting,
in this election,
was Xedicare extremely
imuortant to you, very icucrtant,
fairlv
ieuortant
or not too inuortent?
(-imE
TO scim .o.m 0;: QITET
EXTREMELYIMPORTANT . . . . . . . . . . . . 51-l
VERY IWGRTAXT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FAIRLY IEIPORTANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NWTTOO IKPGRTABT . . . ..*.........
3
r-l4
GO
TO
Nd OPINIOI? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/26-,
7
-c)
Wiich party comes closest
views on Kedicere?
to your
24.
LIBE&RAL..........................
PROGRESSIVECCXXWATIVE .........
N.D.P. ...........................
CHEDTTISTz3 ......................
SOCIAL CREDIT ....................
(.&L #!-CL.,-)
(Yi'im (SPECIFY)
DOii'T Kl1%' .......................
01
62
03
04
05
(55/56)
3 -2)
With which party do you disagree
most on Medicare?
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROCRESSIVECCBSZRVATIVE . . . . . . . . .
Cl
02
N.D.P.
03
. ... ..i ............. .......
CREDITISTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL CELEDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
0r.w~ (SPECIFY)
/1x2L-c LL&'
DON'T IQrOV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8-a)
04
05
Q
00
EXTPEmLY IMPORTAhPT
. . . . . . . . . 57-l
VERY IMPORTATIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
FAIRLY IMPORTANI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOT TOO IlpORTAKT . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nbw what about social welfare in
general, which also covers thinm
like unemployment insurance,
pensions, family allowances, and
so on? Would you say that in
thinking about the election
the
issue of social welfare in
general was extreael:i
imcortant
to you, very imzortsnt,
fairl:r
or not too innortznt?
imuortant,
-m
SHEET ONE GIU'KHITZ S:IEETS)
NO OPINION . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
.
Which of the political
parties comes
closest to your views on welfare in
general?
(59/60)
LIBERAL ........................
PROGRESSIVECOPISERVATIVE.......
N.D.P. .........................
CFZDITISTES ....................
SOCIAL CREDIT ..................
.
$ -d)
With which party
most on welfare?
do you disagree
.
,
-_
(? (. ‘.7- /;a' ,, !.'/ ( .: :, . , ii
.1.-j_.
l-j
:'!,, ..i ,. 7' I,'. .e..;r
!,
.f;!.
,I (/' '.; I-'-a(I
1;
r'*c
,( ~;.:.~.I'
r .' _ I - ,: ,-.;'( ,...:*,. .
_AI -+. ,,
._.-.
-.;h
,*
..,'
*
..-',:,/;'
')'....
04
05
(61/62)
LIBEFZAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROGRESSIVECOliSZRVATIVE . . . . . . .
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREDITISTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL CIiFaIT . . . . . . . . . ...*.....
OTHER(%CIFY)
f&
Lcru)
DOW'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,'t . *Ia: , :: . ,, z
., :.I
-_---
.
01
02
03
01
02
03
04
05
5
00
How about issues concerning
-. .
cost of living,
inequality
9.
-a)
the economy, like unemployment,
housing,
between Canadian regions
or the drop in wheat sales?
Were economic issues extremely
important,
ver-f imnortnnt,
fairly
important,
not too icinortnnt
to
you in making up-your mind about
your vote in this election?
(POINT TO SHEZr ONE ON WHITE SHEETS)
EXTREMELY IKPORTAliT ..,.......
63-1
VERY IKPORTANT ..'...............
2
FAIRLY IIQORTANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOT TOO IMPORTUT
. .. . ... ... ... .
Nd 0P;NION . . . . . . . . ..i..........
b/,
q ‘Cl
,c'a
(65/W
Which of the political
parties
comes closest
to your views
on
the best way to handle the
whole economy?
'LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*.........
01
PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE . . . . . . .
02
NcD.P.
03
.........................
CREDITISTES
_.
.
‘.
_.
_.
-.
. ...................
04
SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
05
_ - _ _.
.._. ^
._
- 5.-
Study 85994
I'll
mention the five particular
economic problems again.
They are:
unemployment,
housing, cost of living,
the inequality
between Canadian regions and the drop in sales
of wheat.
.
-a) Firstly,
could you tell me whether you think each of these problems was extremely important,
very imDOrtant,
fairly: imnOrt2nt
or not too imoortant
to you in making up you mind about
the election?
(PCIIR TO SK&ET ONE ON MiI?'E SKEETS)
Let's start with unenuloymsnt.
How important was it to your decision about this election?
(REPEAT FOP E4CH ITEly LISTED BELOW- ASI; QUESTICNS10-b) AND -c) OXLY FOR EACH ITM
DESCRIBED AS EXTRG,ZLY OR VERY IFIPORTAhT)
-b) Would you tell me whether you think that in the last few years the government has done
too little
to solve
(INSEFFCPROBLE~I(S) EEFF~IO~D AS EXTRE~LY OR VERY IMPORTANT
?m,
that it has done just about the rizht amount, or that it interfered
too much?
-0 > And, which party comes closest to your views on it?
COST Ih'EQUALITY DROP IN
BETWEEN SALE OF
OF
UNEWLOYWWT-HOUhNG LIVING
REGIONS KEAT
-a) IIfPORTA?KJE
P-1 . . . 1o.J'
EXTRE?fELYIWORTANT . . . . . . . . .
VERY IMPORTAIIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
......
2
. 11-1 'T
...
12-1 . .
....
2
2
13-l
....
2
FAIRLY IMPORTANT . . . . . ..n.......
NOT TOO IKPORTANI . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NO OPINION . . . . . ..a.............
-b) THINK GOVEF?Xi+ZIT
RAS DOXE:
TOO LITTLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14-l
RIGRT AMOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTERFERED TOO MUCH . . . . . . . . . . .
_ NO OPINION . . . . . . . . . . ..-........
Exz&L
-c)
. . . 15-l
2 ...... 2
3 ...... 3
4 ...... 4
45
PARTY
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01
PROGRESSIVECONSERVATIVE. . . . 02
N.D.P.
. ............... .. ....
CREDITISTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 16-1
... 2
s.. 3
. . .' 4
9
17-l
..
..
18-l
.... 2 ....
... . 3 ....
.... 4 ....
5
.....
.....
01 '..
02 . .
01
02
...
.. .
01 -...
02 . . .
03 . . . . .
04 . . . . .
03 . .
04 . .
03 . . . 03 . . . 03
04 . . . 04 . . . 04
2
3
4
01
02
SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER (SPECIFY)
NO OPIRION
0-l
q2
O@
(21/22)
O0
(23/24)
Yea
(25/263
_
..
z?(27/28)
,,
- .
11.
Before
the election
last June, how important to
of whether Cwalla should have
a majority
government i.e. whether one party
would have more seats in parliament
than all
the others combined? 1.13~this extrencly
lmportsn... L verr:~ imnortent.
fairly
imnortant.
Or not too Important?
(POIiIT TO SilZET
CJNEOii k;iITE SiiZiTS)
you was the issue
12-b)
HOWinportant
was this issue to YOU
in the Jwx electian?
Would you
say it was:(mAX LIST AXD POINT TO
SHEET ONiTON WHIT2 SXEETS)
EXTREMELYIIQORTANT . . . . 29-1
VEXY IWORTAKT . . . . . . . . . . . 2
FAX&Y IMPORTANT . . . . . . . . .
NOT TOO I!%'ORTANT . . . . . . . .
4
NO OPINION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
&L/.,qTa.
6
important?.........
31-l
Very important? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Extremely
Fairly
.
important?
Not too important?
..............
3
GO
............. I4
TO
Don’tknow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12-c)
Which party is closest
this question?
to you on
Q.13
(32/33)
LIBERAL . . . . . . .."................
PROGRESSI-v?Z
CONSERVATIVE. . . . . . .
01
N.D.P.
03
.........................
CREDITISTZS . . . . .. . . . . .."........
__,.-_ _.-.-.
--_____
I
'v
3.
SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . ..Y.....
%)
OTBR (SPECIFY) /AL
&h
,Doiy
KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
02
04
OS+
moo
Some people
to elections.
13.
.
14.
don't pa:/ much attention
How abo~:t .ybu - would
JOU Say
tht
you
were
ver-f
much
interested,
s&ewha% inte’&st,ed.
or
not much interested
in last June's
election?
VERY ML'CH INTERESTED . . . . . . . .
36-1
SOMEWZT INTERESTED . . . . . . . . ..F.
2
iIOT MUCIJ TNTERc'STED . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T KNO'd . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44 ‘, 9% 4tA.H&
3
4
5
Now I’d like to talk to you about some opinions
that you hear different
people giving.
As I read each’ one, I would just like you to tell me offnand whether you agrree or
disagree.
(DO NOT ACCEPT "YES" OR "NO" ANSWERS- ASK FOR EACH IF THE RESPOTDEfPTAGRSES
OR DISAGREES).
-a)
Voting is the only way that people like me
can have any say about how the government
XWLS things.
Do you agree or disagree?
AGREE ..........
DISAGREE ..........
DON'T KlIObJ ........
37-l
-b)
I don’t think that the government
much what people like me think,
AGREX ...........
DISAGFZE ..........
DON’ T mTOW........
38-l
-c)
Sometimes politics
complicated
that
really
understand
cares
and government seem so
a person like me can't
what's going on.
-d ) People like me don I t have any say about
what the government'does.
-e)
-f)
those elected
the people.
People with University
too large a position
15..
.
16.
Generally,
touch with
to Parliament
degrees take up
in our governments.
How much difference
do you think it makes
to'people
like you what the government in
Ottawa does:
a good deal, some or not much?
How much do you feel that having elections
makes the goverxment pay attention
to what
the people think:
a good deal, some or
not very much?
1’
AGREE .........
.;. 39-I
DISAGREE ..........
DON'T KNOW........
AGREE ...........
DISAGNE ..........
DON.'T KPSObf........
soon lose
G 4
4
f,’
40-l
AGREE . . . . . . . . . . . 41-1
DISAGREE . . . , . . , . . , 2 '*
DON'T KXOT/J. . . . . . . . 3 4AGREE ...........
DISAGREE: ..........
DON'T KNOW ........
42-l
A GOODD.EAL .....
SOME ..............
NOT YiUCH ..........
DON'T KNOW........
43-1
2
3
;
4
A GOODDEAL . . . . . 44-l
SONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOT MUCH . . . . . . . . . . ;
DON'T KNOW. . . . Y...
4
1
ff
4
..
,,
5
f;
t.I
5 .I’
I’
‘2 ,’ ..,,_;. . .
.
\
;(I
------
c :ij
. $scI:j
CA 2
.
.-
:/
_ _ _ _
I would now like to ask you a slightly
different
question:
Here are some ideas people have about the government in Ottawa. How do you feel?
These
opinions do not rtzfer to any pol-iticnl
party in particular,
but just to the government
in general.
For example :
19.
-a)
Do you think that ouite a few of the people
running th governrxnt P.ittle
crooked not ver, 03l-l’ are crookeo.
do you think
hardly
.an;~ of them are crooked?
QUITE A E’ZV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47-1
NOT VZRY XArti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
HARDLYANY/NOISE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; oIcI~,~
DON’T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-b)
Do you think that people.in
the government
waste 2 lot of t’re money we pay in taxes,
vaste some of it, or don’t waste very mu&.
A LOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
som . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOT MUCH/NOTANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON’T KNOY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of?
-c )
-d)
i
-e)
Do you think
that all
people who are hi&
48-l
in
govern;ient give ever::sne a iair break - big shots
and ordinary people alike - oz do you think so38
2
3
4 St4
GIVE EX?RYONEA FAIR BREAK . . 49-l
PAY MORNATTEXTION TO
BIG SHOTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
DON’T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34q
of them pay more attention
to what the big intcrests want?
Do you feel that almost all of the people Nnnine
the government a~‘e smart people who usually know
what they are doing, or do you think that quite
a few of then don't seem to know what they.are
doing?
ALL/NOST KNOtI h!IAT TXEY
ARE DOING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50-l
QUITE A FEV DON’T r;IO’ii
WHATTFEY ARE DOING . . . . . . . . . .
DON’T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;
How much of the time do you think you can
trust the go’ierssent to do vhat is ri&t
just about always, most of the time or
ALWAYS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51-l
MOSTOF THE TI?: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SOMEOF ‘IHi: TIMZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
only someof the tie.??
DON'TKXOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w
‘f.d& y&&..-d
*
11
4 .a a,
4 5 '. "
Y
22.
bne of the
interested
things
in which we are also
is to find out how people are
getting along financially
these days.
As
far as you and your family are concerned,
would you say that you are ore ttg well
satisfied,
more or less satisfied,
or &
at all satisfied
about t:?e way you are
gettine;
23.
.24.'
......
MORE OR LESS SATISFIED
NC‘i? AT ALL SATISFIED
70-l
2
........
3
4 @!&??.a~
..........
DON'T KNOW....................
alon-?0
you and your family
are better off, or worse off financially
than you were a year ago?
Would you say that
Do you
PRETTY WELL SATISFIED
think
that
a year
from
and your family will be better
worse off financially,
or just
the same as you are now?
25-a) Do you' think
that
turned out will
in how well off
now you
off or
about
the way the election
make any difference
you are'!
BETTER OFF .................
71-1
WORSEOFF ..... ..=. ............
ABOUT THE SAPE ................
2
DON’T KNOW ....................
4
BETTER OFF .................
3
WORSE OFF .....................
BETTER ........................
WORSE........................
DON"I' KTIOM....................
I,
5 II
1,
72-l
,2
3
4
ABOUT T!IE SA?t'Z ................
DON'T KKOW....................
YES .........................
NO ..... . ..................
DON'T KXOM ....................
5 I4
cl
73-l
2
4
.
5
6
.
?oming back to the eiecticn,
parties in Canada.
?7.
_--. __
,..
___._
._.. _.___- ..-. .
‘de v!5uld like
_ ._____
to ask some q;cstionz
In your opinion,
do you think it makes a
great deal of difference,
some difference,
or no difference
which political
party is
in power in Ottawa?
'
.
!a.
._.- _._.
Do you think it makes a great deal of
difference,
soma difference,
or no
difference
which party holds office
in
your provincial
Legislature?
^_ ._
about
.
political
GREXT DFAL ;..-...............
sola
DIFFWWS
-.
75-l.
. .. . .. .. .. . . . . .
2
NO DIFFERSUCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
DOB'T 'KJTOW
. . . . . . . ..*..........
4
GREAT DEAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.4
76-l
SOPE DIFFEREBCZ . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
NO DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
DON'T ~:O'A' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..F...
@q-,
4
5
tt
'8
.
30.
G~ncrally spcslcing, do you ucwlly
think of yowzelf
az Liberal,
Con.-erv3tiVE
, :i.rl.p.,
Creilitiste,
I
Social Credit,
Union !Iationsle,
or vhat?
-.
‘.‘.
--
(9/10)
LIBFXAL . . . . . . . . . . .."............
PROGRCSSIVECOIJSEHVATIVE. . . . . . . .
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREDITISTE . . .."..~..".~......'
SOCIAL CREDIT _........,..'
........
L2L’~il~~~.~~~..-.~;;b.
UNION NATIOiiALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RASSE~~~LEI'XiITPOL%
L'INDZPEIIDEXZ XATIOULE . . . . . .
MOlJ-v%~E!ITSO'~fEXIK!ZTE
ASSOCIATIOH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RAILLIENZXT KATIOiIAL . . . . . ..-....
OTHER (SPECIFI)
07
08
GO
TO
09
6.33
10
If
NO PARTY,&?&??&&?+
. ..c+/pq
DON'T lOlOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IF LIBZRAL, PROGRESSIVECO"JSERVATIVE, X.D.P., CRZDITISTZ, SOCIAL C?XIIT
OR LPF/COiS?L?!IST :ZXTIOI!ZD, ASI; QCZSTIOIJS31 ATD 32
31-a) HOWstrongly
(STAT3 3i.S OF C?OS?iIPAX?‘)
do you gayrally
fairly
stron&y,
feel
or
-b) Was there b ver a time when you thou&t
bf yourself
as closest
to any other
party in Canada?
-i)
IF "YES" :
VE3.Y SXOWGLY . . . . . . . . . . il-1
FAIRLY STRONGLY. . . . . . . . . . .
NOT VERY STROKLY . . . . . . . . .
DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . ..e.....
4 &Lpl.n.
- very stron&y,
stron$y?
not very
Which party
was that?
@f/13)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T KKOW. . . . . . . . . . . .
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PR~GRESSIVZ C~IISERVATIVE . . . . .
N.D.P./c;Cr?..:...............
CREDITISTE . . ..*..............
SOCIAL CREDIT s...............
mm
32-a)
K.:len ~01~say YOUare a (STATE ?I.UX OF
C:iOSZli FE_??'?) are you thinkme of national
politics,
politics
here in this province,
or both?
(SPECIFY)
0
03
04
05
06
07
. +
(17/18)
NATIOIXL ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROVIHCIAL O:jLY . . . . . . . . . . .
BOTH. . . . . . . ..I..."........
DON'T KX0l-l . ..I............
'-b)
IF 1IATTOXL O?ILY: Well, how about
politics
here in (Fld'.? YO?IRC:;fl:
PROVIXZ)?
Iiow do you them of
yourself?
LIBEXAL . . . . . . . . ..-...........
PROG~SSI~~ CO::SZVATI'iE . . . . .
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREDITISTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL CXDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UNION iIATIOI;AI,~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RASSZ?31,24G:;'r 1'OLx
04
05
06
07
08
09
“1,:. ,,
3;~~c) TF I’ROVIllCiAL nii1.Y:
in nstioml
.
think
polltlcs'?
(19/20)
Wel.1, how about
LIBERATJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOWdo YOU
of yourself?
/
Co
I
TO QLZSTIGII
GL‘
03
SOCIAL C.MDIT ................
04
05
NO PARTY....................
oa9
“35
DOII’T KIIC:f ..................
35
01
PRGCkZ:S;i?XCG:iXi,Vh'i'iVF: . . . .
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREDITISTE:..................
.
IF UNIOII RATIONALE, MOUVEKWTSOUVERAIXETEASSOCIATION (MSA), RASSDBLE:.m,T
POURL~~m~mmircE
NATI~IULE (RIN) 0~ Pb~LLm43xT XATIOIJAL (fir)
OR "0TH.W' (522 Q.30) MEXTIONED, ASK QJJESTIOIJ3:
; --
-.
_.
33-a) How strongly
(STATE xn2.z 0~ CHOSEN
u)
do you generally
feel - very
strongly, fairly strongly, or not
very strongly?
4)
-c)
Was there evera time when you thought
of yourself; as closest to any other
party:inlCanadaY-:,;+
:::y-:
.-
IF "YES":
Which party
I
VERY STROiJGLY. . . . . . . . . . . . 21-l
FAIRLY STROHGLY. . . . . . . . . . . . .
-NOT VERY S'iRONGLY. . . . . . . . . . . :
DON'T KNOW.,................
4
_-
YES’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:;;;
DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r....
_._.
j;.,:-- -
was that?
:. :-LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:.."PROGRESSIVE
CONSERVATIVE. . .
-r- -_-.- -
i..
-.I
-- :- _ . . . __
;:._--_
.-.: . . . _.
_,. -.
;.:..:...
ch
-f)
':
-S&AL
CREGIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.__
DNION
NATIONALE
.... ........
A__.
I :
.r-..--.
RASSEr&Lti&JT POUR
::.
.
.
_c.-.
.:
L!INDEPEXDENCENATIONAL . .
-....
-;;.. MOUVEMENTSOL7'~INETE
1_. ASSOCIATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- RALLIEPIENT NATIOIJAL (RN) . . .
._
- -. :.... cl;..:
_.___,
: -- .:-
-d) \&en did you change from that
_- - ‘It&f
,
(=c;?3)
jLr-No:.
.._.......................
.:.: -N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-;~CREDITISTE
................ .
-’
5qknA~
:
---
party
to your &es&t
04
05
01
07
08
/
09
I
:
10
11
-+(ssxa&
one?
-\-L&R
lrlhat was the main thing that made you change?
--wtC,Lkl
.
/:'.__..- --_ -----.-~-I-16~ do jrou think of-yourself
in--"
(U/28)
_._ __~_.__.
national-I politics?
LIBERAL
01
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
__.----1
-____-_
_--~-__ _. _-.-.- ..02
PROGRESSIVE
COIISCRVATIl'Z
.
.
.
_ _ ---.
---.N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03
CREDITISTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
cpE&T ( SpEC11,y) A&-.% 7ks-J~
.
NO I'AiWY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T JCJJOW
. . ...' . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
__-.- -. _.
:
04
05
06
0 '19
oq9
.I
.
1 IF N,, PARTY IDC,TIFICATICll, - ASK QVXXIGIi 34 i
-b)
IF “ES”, FEELS CLGER:
Vhich party is that?
LIXRAL
. . .. . . ... . .. .. .. .. .. ... ... . .. . ...
COiISFRVATIVZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CtEDITI~,S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL C.smIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*........
UNIOK RATIOYALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RASSEt~3L+X POLR L'IKD3PEZDSICE
PROCIWSSIVZ
-cl
men you say you feel closer to (NAN3
PAP.TYIN &34-b),
are you thinkin& of
national politics,
palitics
here in
the province or both?
.
03
04
05
06
NATIONAl ONLY . . . . . . . . . . .
*
BOTH ....................
MIN'T KNOW..............
-d)
-0)
IF tIATIO::.Q, OirLV: 'Well. how about palitics
here XT !'x‘T- P?OVI!YCE)? To which party do
you gsera11y see1 closer?
IF p3OVTT:CIAL OYL\l: How about national
politic;?
To vnlch party do you generally
feel closer?
LIBERAL .................
PROGRESSIWCOXSZWATIVE
N.D.P. ..................
CREDITISTE ..............
SOCIAL CP.S?)IT ...........
UNION NAA?IO::ALE.........
02
r!=ziq44
",z :
07
08
09
&kTIOiLALE [HI?r) . . ..a..
MOLNE?E!ITSO~J.?Z'GU~-ZTE
ASSOCIATION (GA) . . . . .
RALLI&G:!lT XATICXAL (RX)
11
12
NO P!&T? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T jZIOW ..I...........
:fi
IU
(33/34)
LIBEP.AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01
pROCP.ESSIVZCOXSF?.VATIVE 02
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03
CREDITISTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04
SCCIAL CPJDIT . . . . . . . . . . . 05
-c-mm+mvl**
NO ;iRTY ..................
DON'T KXOW..............
-f)
Kas there ever B tine when you felt
closer to any other party?
-g)
IF "YES":
YES .....................
(35636)
._
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
02
FROCRESSIVXCOilC34VATIVE
04
N.D.P. /&<':k:.........
. OS
CREDITISTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
06
SOCIAL CREDIT
Which party YSS that?
,
-J)
-k)
IF :-? i).:$:;‘”
r?‘+ C!,CS’ ‘:I ?.>!A?:
t,,crr
EVBT: 3 ‘-1:< i:,cn yc.l did r:.i?L<
your;elf
as clo.:er
IF "\yj":
hii':?
?I;
oi
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
N5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DC!,' T i::nx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /-F-lTj~f~,g
pnrty Vi13 thlt? I,I:iX?~L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03
Pn:x'x3sI',:J CI;::“xI!'X;'I:E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04
05
N.D.P. .(:.:. k.............,............
'CEZI~!Tl~.'Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OG
SCCIAL ClixIrP . . . . . . .._..................
07
u11:u:: !iA'"iJ::AI.J . . . . . . . . . . . ._ . . . . . . . . . OS
R.kj$L‘:~.!<,,$T:..';:I
LI Fi>l?GI,' i !ii~i:Fi:ililE:ii:i:
..
NATIUIII\L (HlX) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09
MUUYK~tF:TI'P
SOll'~S~iA~~~i~~t'~:
A::COC1A'l'Ic)il (PEA). 10
*ALL1Ew,'P w;PII!:IA:. (I:!;) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
&L&(&;g,.&G$t0 one 0T the partics?
.
__ __ _-.
-
_
_
-
._...
.
_.
-
_.
.
-,
*:,.‘..
.,.
_
. ..
‘..
:,’ - .:*.,.
2.
- ..
:“.y
:
;.*
..
.*
“..
..-....c.
.
-
35.
-
36.
.
‘.. .
.
2
Do you happen to rcmembcr the name of
who w:x: elected
to
the candidate
Parliament
far tk;iz rir! in:: in the
June 25th .election?
LIut is it?
Do you happen
What is it?
to know his
:
I
(her)
NP
NOT
. .....
cJJp&x.
..
..
......
. .... ......
., ...
..i
..‘...............
.................
YES (EZNTER PARTY) . ..'. .......
party?
&et/ ,&dLJ
NO .................................
NOTSURE..........................
/’
.
i
YOU
happen to know whether he (she)
was already
in Parliament
just before
this election?
38-a) Do
PARLIAEEi\pT
IB
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
.
0
46-l
3
4
5
25
.
41’.
42-a)
-b)
In federal
elections
since you have
been old enough to vote in Canada,
including
the one held this June,
would you
say that you have voted
in all of them, most of them, some
of them, or none of them?
VOTED IN ALL . . . . . . ..-I..
Have you always voted for the same
party
in federal
elections,
or have
you voted for different
parties?
VOTED FOR SAW3 PARTY . .
IF SAME PARTY:
Which party
is
31-1
VOTED IN MOST . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
VOTED IN SOME . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
VOTED IN NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T REXEXBER . . . . . . . . . . . .
n
VOTED FOR DIFFERENT
LIBERAL
that?
GO TO Q. 43
t.
...................
PROGRESSIVE 'CONSERVATIVE . .
N.D.P.
3
4
....................
............ ...
5
SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
CREDITISTES
0 q
?,.U .
m==JASK EVERYOKE
33-1
VOTED IN ALL . . . . . . . . . . .
In provincial
elections
since you
have been old enough to vote,
would
you say that you have voted in all
of them, some of them,
of them, most
or none of them?
43.
VOTED IN MOST . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
VOTED IN SOKE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VOTED IN NONE
l
.
.
.
l
.
.
l
.
.
.
l
.
~j&
5
DON'T RE??ETIIBER. . . . . . . . . . . .
44-a)
...
VOTED FOR SAME PARTY
In provincial
elections,
have YOU
always voted for the same party,
or have you voted for different
I paSties?
-b)
IF SAME PARTY:
Which party
is
0
VOTED.FOR DIFFERENT
PARTIES . . .../. ;;;;;&
pcr$xsT
cdkf&
1
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
that?
PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE . .
N.D.P.
45.
IF DIFFZRISI?! PJRTY:
different
parties
out
because some parties
the election
in your
constituency?
Did you vote for
of choice or
did not contest
province
or
If you voted,
for which party did
you h;lppon to vote in the last
p-ovincisl
election?
-
.,..................
SOCIAL CREDIT/&&'&..
5
UNION NATIOiTALE . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ($qTqa
2-di-t PC-CL c&.J~~~v~A.~
c -.7
OTHER (SPECIFY) J,,J,,,--.&j'i,-s,.8
'.
-c)
OUT OF CHOICE . . . . . . . . . .
35-1
PARTY NOT RUXNING . . . . . . . . .
2
DOW'T KNOW . . . . . ...' . . . . . . . .
3
DID HOT VOTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a
VOTED FOR:
36-l
LISERAL . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
PROX!?SSIVE
COilSERVATIVE . . . . .
3
......
4
N.D.F./C.C.F.
.
3
4
s0cIA1,ClmT/&?z-~-~5
IJNIOM JJATTOMALE . . . .
6
4q.
h/,A-
46-a)
IF UAS IIUUI VOI’ED Ili 9.41, CO D1N:CTI.Y TO Q.46-c)
Now thinking about this ywr’o
June electlon , !e Find that a lot of pooplc v&,‘t
able
to vote b.?c-3::" thy v*x ::ck. or didn't ~J./u tmc. 01 hod borne other reazon Car not
voting.
HOWabout YOU? Did you vote this tim9 or did somthing keep you tron’ vo tine?
‘ES, VOTED . . . . . . . . . . . ..- 1
NO, DID NOT VOTE . . . 37-2 7
IF VC?ED: For which party dl,
you vote?
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-b)
38-i
PA’XESSIVE’ COSS’RVATIVE . . . .:. . .
B.D.P.
..........................
:
4
CREDITISTZS .....................
5
SOCIAL CPZDIT ...................
6
-c) Was:,the.s any particular
r?ason’why you didn't vote
in the June election?
SICK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39-1
BUSY .? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
COULDN’T DECIDE . . . . . . . . 3
NOT II~?l’MESTZD . . . . . . . . . 4
FORCOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
DON’T KNOW, NO
PARTICKL43 FGASON. . . . . 6
oJ!xz? (SPEC ?I)
A.55
s&J
-d) tie would you’have
voted for?
WN’T REKSXBER..................
9
LIBE.PAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-Z
PR0GRr3551’~
COXSZRVATIVZ . . . . . . . . . . 3
N.D.P. .................
4
CPZDITISXS ............
5
SOCIAL CRZDIT ..........
6
-qpzy
&S,&
7
WN’T k?iOW.............
!
\
9
IF HAS KG’ZR VOiSD 13 Q.41, GO TO Q.53 NOHI
IF HAS VOTED BrGT1:OT IX 1468 CO TO Q.50 >;OW
.
49-a)
.b)
If at this time you hod to vote for one of the other federal
would you pick? (C:XXK B3,OW - DO XOT R3.D LIST
hhich of the fedad
Parties to-day would you &Z& want t0
(CECK BLLOV - DO NOT FEAD LIST)
parties,
Vote
which Party
for?
(a)
(4
SECOXD LEAST w.vP
CHOICE TO VOTE FOR
54-I
LIBEXAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53-l
pi@‘~FSSI‘~ CO:;3siiYArI’IE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . 2
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . .
~-fXlITIST~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . .
. . . . .. . . 5
SOCGL CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L?..ic
4!G4d
mm
(sFEcIFY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... .... 0
h’o CfiOIC!i! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
mI,‘T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . 9
Rd.
Y./J
0
-b)
YES, VOlXD . . . . . . . . . . . 0
l'hc last federal election
before the one in June
~33 ir. 1965. 23 ;-xl rc!x;cheI. for 3UrE wh2tk?r
X0, DID NOT VOTE . . . . . 55-l
or not you voted tin that election?
LIEE?AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.
IF VC'T%D: Which party did you vote for?
PROCF.ZSSIVECOiGWVATIVZ . . . . . . . . . . 3
. 4
EI.D.P. ...........................
CREDITISTE ........................
.5
.
/
/
.
\
I
6
SOCIALCBZDIT
mm (SPECIFYj”‘~‘~~~f””
DON’T REEBER
COTO Q.52
.... ...... .... ....... 9
I
!
52.
Were you able to vote in the 1958 election,
the one in vhich
Mr. Ciefenbaker
and Mr. Pearson opposed one another for
the first
time'
IF "yES"r
Hou did you vote
at that
time?
LIImAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROGRESSIVECONSz.P,VATIVE.,..
8.D.P.jC.C.F.
SOCIAL Cp.TJ)ITj.gg;.g;&-::
:
OTHER (STECIFY) &z-c lu;ic,r
DON'T RZiGK3XR . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
3
;
9
..
I
.
c
53-a)
There are many aspects of political
parties which strike Canadians in different
wsyo. we
would like to get your feelin:
towards some of thcso aspects of our pnrtres.
we are
interested to see how ybu liked the Irn,irrs,
ttir: work of thn ripmbcrs of the vrrioli-c nnrtics
in the Pnrliancnt whit!? sat be,for? th? 13st election.
the nnri.;~‘s cnn,iidat? in vo11r ridin,? in
the 13; t t:l+c ClOil, ii:" p?.rty clr;,~3~m in the last elcct~on, and the part y 2s 2 whole.
(POIWTO PAGE8 O? KiITZ Si!EETS)
You'll see here a drawing of a thermometer.
It's been called a "feeling thermometer"
because it helps measure one's feelings towards various things.
Here's how it works.
If you don't particularly
like or dislike
the person, group or activity
we are asking about,
place them at the SO degree mark. If your feelin@ are very warm then you would give a score
between 50 and 100, the warmer your feelings,
the higher the score.
On the other hand, if you do not like the person, group or activity
very much, you would
place theim somewhere between 0 and 50. The cooler your feelings,
the closer the number
will be to 0.
If you don't know too much about one of the items mentioned, just say so, and we'll go on
to the next one.
Let's start with the Liberals.
How much do you like their leader, Mr. Trudeau? mere would
you place him on the thermometer?
And what about the work of the Liberal Members in the la
Parliament?
How did you like
what they did, taken 2s a whole?
HOWmuch did you like your local Liberal candidate in the 1968 election?
HOWwould you rate the Liberal party. taken as 2 whole?
national canosi~~ before the last election. .7
And, finally,
what about the Liberals'
REPEATFOR CONSERVATIVEPARTY (Insert Stanfield's
name as leader)
REPEL4TFOR N.D.P. PARTY (Insert Dougl2s’ name 2s leader)
WASA CANDIDATE
REPEATFOR SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY (Insert Patterson’s name as leader)
FROMTHIS PARTY
DES CREDITISTES (Insert Caouette's name as leader)
q
7-C
8-5
L
WORK
NATIONAL
PARTY
PARTY’S 1968
OF FARTY
CAMPAIGN
TAKENAS
IN LAST ’ CANDIDATFIN
LEADEROF
IN 1968
A WOLZ
PARLIAMEWT YOlTRRIDI>JG
THE PARTY
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
RATING OPINION RATING OPINION RATING OPINION RATING OPINION RATING OPINION
--------.
-a) RATINGS:
LIBERALS . . . . . . . .
90 lo-
-
PROGRESSIVE
CONSERVATIVES
..
llO12-
-
N.D.P. . . . . . . . . . .
13q l4-
*CREDITISTES . . .
*SOCIAL CRDIT . .
jJ 15
1617q l8-
-
* ASK ONLY IF PARTYUD A C.AXDID.ATE
IN TZTS RTDIKG Iii Z<Z JL?;P ELSCTIOiI
q l920-
-
29,, 30-
q 2122-
-
o 3132-
O2423IJ 25-
-
26- A
+;:
0 3536-
rJ 4950-
-
390 40-
-
41O42-
-
q 4344-
-
520 5453-
m4546-
-
0 5556-
'48-47-
-
0 5758-
___
q Sl-
-b)
ASK F?P!?'ir)?rE: In deciding
to you:
ttin loaders,
the
a wholo?
Which
was next
Which would
-b)
-
most important
you say was
IMPORTAliCE:
what YCU would do in this recent.elcction,
work of the IV's,
your local
c.lndidates,
least
.......
"WE NATIOZAL CAXPATCIJ 111.1963"
IS NOT TO BE IliCLLDED IN PSRT -b)
NOTE:
important?
LEADER OF
THE PARTY
59-l
lilTi'
MOST . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60-l
LEAST IKPORTAilT . . . . . . . 61-1
MOST IJi?ORTAm
to you?
WORK
OF PARTY
IN LAST
PARLIAlmT
.....
.....
... ..
2
PARTY'S 1968
CAXDIDATE IN
YOUR RIDIITG
.......
2 .......
2 .. .....
54. Suppose
PARTY
TAKE1 AS
A WOLE
3 ........
3 ........
3 ..* . . . . .
there was an election
in which the party you
favour
ran 2 candidate
in your riding
whom you did
not like
or did not agree with.
Knat would you be
most .li!ely
to do? Vote for the candidate
anyway?
Consider
another
party's
candidate?
Or would you
probably
not vote at all?
>!hich was most important
or the parties,
taken LIS
DON' T
KNOW
-----I
-w
'S
4
... ..
5
6
4
4
.....
.... .
5
5
6
6.
VOTE CANDIDATE AHWAY
s........
62-1
CONSLDER CTRER ?ARTY CANDIDATE . . .
WOULDN'T WTE AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IT DEPENDS, QUALIFTED . . . . . . . . . . . .
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/zl{:
n/.#4.
;5=
56.
57.
Suppose there was an election
in which the
party you prefer was in favour of some
policy
you did not like or did not agree
with.
What would you be most likely
to
the party's
candidate
anydo? Vote for
way? Consider another party's
candidate?
Or would you probably not vote?
VOTE CABDIDATE ANYWAY . . . . . . . 63-1
CONSIDER OTRER PARTY
CANDIDATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
WOULDTT'TVOTE AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . 3
IT DEPZUX , CJALIFIED . . . . . . . . . 4
DON'T KXOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
HAS NO PARTY PIIEFERENCEWOW. . . 6
Suppose there was an election
in which
the party you prefer had a leader or a
team of leaders you did not like or did
not agree with.
What would you do?
Vote for that party's
candidate
anyway?
Consider another party's
candidate?
Or would you probably
not vote?
VOTE CANDIDATE AllZiAY . . . . . . . 64-l
CONSIDER OT?ZX FARTY
CANDIDATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WOULDN'T VOTE AT ALL . . ...*....
;
IT D%PX:DS, qJ~LIFIZD ..* . . . . . . 4
DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CIAS NO PARTY PRSFEP??:CENOIf . . .
One of the things we are interested
in is
the differences
which exist between our
federal
political
parties.
Considering
everything
the parties
stand for, would
you say that there is a good deal of
difference
between the parties,
some
difference,
or not much difference?
GOODDEAL OF DIFFERENCE . . . . 65-1
SOW DIFFLXSUCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
NOT FIUCII DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . 3
DON'T aOl%J . ..'.....
.. .. . .. . . . . . 4
DEPENDS ON PARTIES/QUALIFIED . . 5
.
--.
A/
0
A& 4 ,&~.-24 ;, cc&. L3j.Q &w-l q +
&LA +?/-y? &-( 5
59-a)
Now 1 am going to read you a list
of things often said about Mr. Trudeau.
like your reaction
to them. In each case please tell me whether you m
statement or whether you disaaree.
If you don't how, just say so.
I would
with the
pIMbac-QjG2-j
DON'T a/.
AGREE DISAGPXE KNOW R&W.Mr. Trudeau is highly
He is tough-minded
intelligent
....
..;................
He is arrogant
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
He is capable of solving tiglishFrench problems in Canada . . . . . . . . . .
He is too rigid
.... .. ..... .... .. .....
He is charming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
He is pro-communist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
His views are conservative
He is fair-minded
--
...........
..... ..... ..........
He is honest
.........................
He has an inadequate concern for
public moral standards . . . . . . . . . . . . .
He is able to stand up to Quebec
demands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
He is progressive
.. ............. .....
-b)
42-1
...
2
. ..
3
-4
43-l
...
2
...
3
4
4-4-l
...
2 ...
3
4
45-l
...
2 ...
2
...
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
3
'4
46-l
I.
47-l
...
48-1
49-l
...
. ..I
2
...
2 ...
2 ...
SO-l...
51-l
...
2
. ..3
..:
3
52-l
2
...
.. .
33-l '...
54-1
2 ...
. . . '2
...
4
3
4
3
4
'(-
What about these statements sometimes made about Mr. Stanfield?
Do you w,
disa flee or don't you know?
DON'T w,
READ LIST 3OTTO:~ITO TOP
AGFzEZ D1SAGRlX.EKiJOW -X&M.Mr. Stanfield
is a man of great
integrity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55-l
... 2 .. . 3
4
He is highly intelligent
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-l
... 2 ... 3
4
His manner is too slow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57-l
. . . 2 . . . ‘3
4
He is capable of solving EnglishFrench problems in Canada . . . . . . . . . . 58-l
... 2 ... 3
4
He is fair-minded
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59-l
... 2 ... 3
.4:
He is too soft
on French Canada . . . . . .
His views are conservative
He is too quick
...........
to make promises
.....
..... ... ...... .......... .
He is under Dalton Camp's influence
..
He is honest
He is better suited for provincial
'than for federal politics
..........
He is progressive
. . ..*...............
60-1' ..;
61-1 . . .
62-l a..,
63-l
64-l
...
...
2 .. .
2 ...
2 ...
3 '. 4
3
4
3
4
2 .. . 3
4
2 ..< 3
.4
65-1.;.2...3
66-1 . . . 2 . . .
3
_-.
4
4
r
.',_-a
62.
We are interested
in how Canadians
think of their
country.
There is quite a variety
of
Some think of Canada as basically
an English
country.
Others see it as
opinion
here.
a partnership
bctwecn French and Enclish-speaking
founding
g-roups and still'
others
view it primarily
as the homeland of people of various
different
[email protected].
\hich
of
these fits
your idea of Canada?
ENGLISH COUNTRY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67-l
PARTNERSHIP BETWEXN MGLISH
AND FRENCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
HOMELAND OF VARIOUS PEOPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
JUST CAXADA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
oTHER(SPEcIFI)
,&x
.
@M
DON'T KNOW I............................
9
0 q.
7l.A*
LT..+,,'_r!@;L(,~&2X
64-a)
-b)
Who would you say have more in
common: French Canadians and French
people from France; or French
Canadians and English
Canadians,
that is to say English-speaking
people of British
ancestry?
FRENCH CANADIAN AND FRENCH 69-l
And who do you think has more in
common when Canadians and Americans
are compared?
bho has more in
common: English
Canadians and
French Canadians or tiglish
Canadians
and Americans?
Here again English
refers
to English-speaking
people
of British
ancestry.
ENGLISH AND FRENCH
CANADIAXS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-c 1 And what about English
Canadians
and French Canadians or English
Canadians and British
peoplewho has more in common?
FRENCH CANADIAN AND
ENGLISH . . . . . . ..a..........
2
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
cjqaz-hc
--.g
ENGLISH AND APWICAN
3
70-l
........
2
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
a&,&‘ciy~~/-~,
/HI o!$pd*-c,
y&.J
ENGLISH CANADIANS AND
FREXH CANADIANS . . . . . . .
2
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
&La,& - - - 5
4 piy,71.&
--. 5-
71-l
ENGLISHXANADIANS AND
BRITISH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ti-L&
4 ly',fl,".
I+fg.-ws
- 20 -
Study 85994
7-o
n 8-7
#&-fk
. 65.
19-2
Now, once again I should like to read some short statements.about
Canada
and I'd like you to tell me whether you agree or disagree with each. Please
tell me whether you a-Tee stronrly,
azree mildly,
disa,Tee mildly,
or
disa.Tee stron?l,r.
(POIIJT TO PACE ONE OF \:?iITE SKEXTS) DISDISREAD LIST Br""',." mn mr,n 1
NO
q*
AC%% AGREE AGPZE AGRET
STDOIiGLY-KILDLY KILDLY STRONGLYOPI?JION ?%%
Canada should abolish
Canada's constitution
the monarchy . . . . . . . . .
should be changed . . . .
Homosexuals should be imprisoned
...........
Canada should withdraw its troops from
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Too much money is being spent on churches
in Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'Canada and the United States should join
together as one country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Communists should be outlawed . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It was a good idea to try to abolish the
death penalty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10-l
..
2
..
3 ...
4 ...
5
11-l
..
2
..
3
...
4
...
5
12-l
..
2
..
3
...
4
...
5
13-l
..
2
..
3 ... 4
...
5
6
14-l
..
2
..
3 ... 4
...
5
6
15-l
..
2
..
...
5
16-l
. . '2
..
3 ... 4
3 ... 4
...
5
6
6
4 ...
5
6
17-l
..
2
..
3 ...
Illegal
strikes should be.broken up by
the police . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18-l
..
2
..
Canada needs less severe
19-l
..
2
..
3 ... 4
3 . .. 4
...
.. .
5
5
6
6
20-l
..
2
..
3 ... 4
...
5
6
21-1
... 2
..
3 .. . 4
...
5
22-l
..
2
.,.
3
...
4
...
5
6
6
23-l
..
2
..
3
...
4
divorce
laws . ...*.
Canada would be a better place if all people
had the same religion
.. .. ............ .. ..
Canada would be a better place if all people
had the same national
origin
.. ...........
It was a good idea to unify the armed forces
Provincial
governments should participate
\
at international
educational
conferences .
...
5
6
Canada should continue providing
peacekeeping forces oversees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 ... 4 ...
5
6
Canada should not get involved
problems of other countries
3 ... 4 ...
5
6
Now, I will
ask you a couple
24-l
.. 2 ..
in the
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-1 . . 2 . .
of questions about English-French
relations
in Canada:
Thinking now of the
would you guess are
There has been quite
separating
from the
Please' tell r.e vhethfr you are
you in favour of separation
or opposed to it?
stronclv
in fa.:onr of separation,
cl.i.tiltly
in fa;-ol1r,
-or stron-l\i
0n:)osed to separation.
(TOIIIT ,TO FXS OiJD OF ly..Iii'E s;zLcs)
STROIJGLY
SLIKTLY
SLIXTLY
STEOiJGLYIII
L?JDECIDED
I?J FAVOU!? -' F1zVOUR
28-1 . . . . . .
........
-..
_.
Do you think
that
Quebec will
separate
some time
in
the future?
YES . . . . . 29-1
NO . . . . . . . . . 2
DOX'T KNOW . 3
4 i?,:.1: *:
Suppose a vote were taken in Quebec tomorrow on the question
of
separation,
about what percentage
of the voters
in Quebec do you
think would-vote
for separation?
(TWJJ TO PAGE ii
68-a)
-b)
ON\~ITE
SHEETS AND READ LIST)
Which of the following
is
Which, of the remaining
the most
is
four,
dangerous
the
least
to the survival
dangerous
of Canada?
to Canada?
(a>
GREATEST THREAT
Internal
French
Ekternal
disunity
conflict
resulting
from
...........................
An atomic
war
The using
up of natural
American
English-
. ............
.....................
economic
resources
and social
..............
domination
........
. 4.........................
NO OPINION,&?-&~
lz5+&!,%
70.
Although
Canada's role in world
it did come up for discussion.
or not too interested
interestd,
...........
37-1
2
.............
2
3
4
.............
3
4
5
.............
6
.............
36-1
of communism ...................
danger
(b)
LEAST DANGEROUS
(cc., .
.............
y
5
6
7
7
affairs
did not become a major issue in the election,
Are you extr&ely
interested,
very interested,
fairly
in foreign
affairs?
EXTRXI~ZLY IKTERZSTL'D . . . . . 38-1
VERY I?IT"?3T"D
LLL, u . . . . . . . . * . . . .
p*Ip,Ly p;"':"<-S'IFD
_ _LI..d -J . . . . . . . . . . . ;
, r,-tr>-rC
NOT TOO I:ILi,:~~~~TED
. ..... ....
NO OFIXO:;
..................
;
I_
--i..:
.
.;.‘.
-..
.
.
(TURN TO FACE ONE OF MlITE SIXETS)
71. Iicre are som of the su;;c3stions that
world affairs.
For each, please tell
disagree
mildly
or disagree
strongly.
-4
4
-4
4
-4
. -f)
-4
-h)
'72.
Canada should become more involved
in Latin America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39-1
..
2
...
....
....
Canada does not need to maintain
its
present level of military
forces
..
40-l
..
2
...
....
. ., . .
Canada should establish
closer
relations
with CommLinist China
....
41-1
..
2
...
....
.
.
.
reduce its
.......................
42-5
..
4
...
....
.
.
Canada should send militiry
forces
to help the United States in
Vietnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*...
43-5
..
4
...
....
.
Canada should continue
to give the
United States the use of Canadian
bases and air space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44-5
. . '4
...
....
Canada's foreign
policy
should be
more independent
of the
United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45-l
..
2
...
... .
Canada should encourage an increase
in the. number of immigrants
from
Asia and Africa
...................
46-l
..
2
...
Canada should
foreign
aid
Taking foreign
policy
which party is closest
views'?
._.. _-. i&i
73.
have been made about what Canada should do In
me whether you agree strongly,
apee mildly,
If you have no opinion,
please say so.
fL{.
AGREE
AGREE DI%dREE DISAGREE NO
XILDLY
STR@iGLY
OPIBION
7%
L
STRONGLYMILDLY
as a whole,
to your
-.._ .,.____-__ -. -_--.._---.
Now I !lave just a few more questions,
this time about ;;ou.
Are you married,
widowed, separated,
divorced,
or are
you single?
*
-....
s
6
l
5
6
.
.
1
6
.
.
.
1
6
.
.
.
.
1
6
.
.
.
.
5
6’
.
.
.
.
5
6
LIBERAL .........................
PROGRESSIVE COBSERVATIVE ........
. ..................
N.D.P. .......
CREDITISTES' .....................
SOCIAL CREDIT ...................
(4?/4g
01
02
03
04
05
-----.A OTHER (SPECIFY)
w
*
DON'T KNOIsI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . &-+czd
MARRIED ...................
TI!IDWED ......................
SEPARATED ....................
DIVORCED .....................
nrrr.-7 77
49-1
2
3
4
_.
-
-__----_
_-
..
-..
-
74-a)
. ..-
---..-
._._._.
‘.
.--
.-.
-.-..-
,flpd,
What is your occupation?
PROBE: What kind of work do you actually
---
----.---..
.
50fJ-
A&++4
do?
..-.
-.
._____
"
..I
..-_I
:
.
_ _. .
/24-T--
.
. .._.---..I-. ._-.._
- ____...___
. ..l. .__._.
._.___..___
.:
4
-.. -.-. Sl- 1
7f-b)
In what type of business
5253-
do you wotik?
.
/f?L4iJ
PROBE: 1hat do you do there?
i
-
_..
.._
WIO usually is your family's
va& earner?
main
.
_..-*.
.-...
__
__
--.
_
RESPONDENT,MI0 TS YILE HEAD
(INCLUI)ES SIiICLE HAN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-1
RESFONDiM'' S Ii WiiAiTD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RESPOI~DIX?:T'S
!~‘A'l'i!ZR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;
RESPOIIDISII'i"S i,',2'1'ill.:ii-IFi-Lhi,i . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
RESFONDFNT
, MC IS IWIALE IlEAD
(II&Ix5
SINCIJ? '~!oiw) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
RESPOIU~IXP' S !iT Id? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
OTHERMALF: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
cn'llfcl~ lW[‘LZI,U: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
....
_
c&A!
0-l
..-..._.. ._._-.. ._
--.
76-a)
.r 4.:
/,&
I
,.
I?
-. ._... __.. .__ ..-. .___. .__._. -_.
PROBE: What kind of work does (he/she)
.5&.&
does (he/she)
cc&
sq/G
actually
--.--.
-.___
-
*
do?-
work?
O-4 &-t-Q 4
v
74&-/k&
c&.s3rc5P
mua
. . ._ _
.
____.____.__I_ ._____.
6
- . ..--.-_-..-
What is the main earner's
PROBE: What does (he/she) do ttiere?
77-a) How many years of school did you attend?
C,.&’
B-94$
..-.
(IF RESPONDENTIS NOT MAIN WAGEEARNERASK:)
-b) In what type of businecs
. _.._ -.. .-.
--._---.--...I.-=--I.-.---;-I.-...L...----.--
YEARS
.
-_
.__...I__ ___I ..-_1: __-. ..:-. -_ .:i
_. ..::
- - . _
-- 61----e
77-b)
What is the high est grade of school you reached?
--. .
_-
GQ4p.
e--.
_.. -_-.
_--
.
..
.,
.
09% L c
Did you take any of your primary or secondary
in a church-affiliated
or "separate"
school?
n
.,:
education
-
.
YES . . . . . . . . . .
63-1
NO *...,.........*
' 1' YJIOW . . . . . . .
DON
YES . . . . . . . . . .
NO . . . . . . . . . . . .
c~~&~'-~6i:
2
3
4fi#/.71.d
0
64-1
EWGLIS!I OXLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FXFIICli
J
OXLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EMGLIS!I Ai,'D .?I'E'.CI!
/ .,
... .. ............
ENGLlS!I Ai,iD Fl;EiIClI MID CTiiZR . . . . . . .
FNGLT@lI
I
" Aill) Wi~ETi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FRE:NCIIANU OTillQt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O'IWER(CIIXXE CODE AND SPECIFY)
J2.y&
f&y. @&+-&L./f
How many years of cchool did your father nttcntl?
&,,1* &
d,, iA,/ 4 '7.1~~ A-+?
Your best guess will do.
t ,
.
L+.J~-
IF RESPONDEXTHAS MORET?MI 11 YEARS OF SCKOOLIIIC,
or College?
ASK: Did you ever attend University
IF "YES" , ASK: In what latq-ua,~ did
you study at University
or College?
_ 62-
QLLtLL.4
6566-
4
5
6
7
6
y Cl
t1.n.
- .
_._;I-.
C&J
0
7
:
-
-
----
- _-..-
.._.._
.
_ .- -...
-b)
-c)
_ _ -.
. .
.
~___--_---_
._ ._
8577Y
.
----
_
..--__.
79-a)
__.,_.
.:..:
__.---.--_..-
‘r
social classes.
One hears a lot about different
Do you ever think of yourself
as belonging
to a social class?
YES . . . . .
0
NO . . ._.. .
67-9
GOTO &.79-c)
,'
five social classes would you say you were in IF "YES" ASK: Which of the following
class, middle class, worki&class,
or lower class?
upper class, upper-middle
IF "NO" ASK: Well, if you had to make a choice, would you say you were in class, middle class, working class, or lower class?
upper class, upper-middle
_-.
.
UPPER CLASS ...........
. .....
UPPER-MIDDLECLASS ..............
,.
67-l
..........
2
.............
68-l
2
MIDDLE CLASS ...................
3
............
3
WORKINGCLASS ..................
4
............
4
LOWERCLASS .....................
5
............
5’
6
THERE IS NO SUCHTHING ..........................
,
1
DON'T KNOW
80.
I
What is your
p’c. -ma.-religion?
1
a
ROMANCATUOLIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
02
ANGLICAN .............................
,03
04
PRESBYTERIAN .........................
BAPT,IST ..............................
IF "PROTESTAIZT"PROBE
FOR SPECIFIC DENONIlIATION
01
UNITED CHURCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LUTHERAN.............................
05
06
UKRAINIAN (CREEK) CATHOLIC ...........
07
GREEK-ORTHODOX
.......
OS
. ...............
JEWISH ...............................
09
;
.
.
c&J
._,. -.-.. . . . .. . .-.. _ .-. I
07
. Si.'..
.
_
.
About how often do you go to church
.('syna~wg-~~)? At least once a week,
two or three times a month. once a
month, a few times a year or less,
hever?
_-.
_._
.:
..-.-4
-.-._- .-
__
_
- .- _..- ..--...--...cp(?y/q
-. -.
^-
-
_ .
~-
-
-
_-..-.__.
. . .
.-_.-... . . ._ . _
_
_
,.
-
_
.
”
-
_.
.
_.
-
......
...
.
AT LEAST WEEKLY . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
. I.._.
._..
-
.__..
.. _._ ........
_
.-..
_. _.
-
-
-
-.
-
‘-_-
.-
--..-
-
..-. .__-. -.,
-.
-
-.
.. ._.. ._~
-......
----
2 OR 33’ItES
3
A FEW TIHEX A YlQi.R OR LESS . . . . .
4
'NEVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c
5
-
-.- ..
--.-
--.
. ._
-..--
.. _ ...
.__.C.
-.----
._..-
. _ _ - - - -. - ..^.._
--_..
.
..-.--_
.......
.._ . _._
2.
.
6$$.
..-..-___...- -.__..
-...e . _..---_.__
__-.--_-...-.-.-.-.
-I :zc-mAL
----
71-l
MONTHLY . . . . . . . . . . .
ONCEA MONTH'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
‘. LLLd& U-L&i:‘c
..-._.---.-
.---.--____-_.-_
._.
8sssy
_..._
_
-
--.I
-.
_
. -.-
.-
_
.
--
-
-
-
-
-_.
.
.
-
.
_ _ .- . _ -
_
.-
.-
. --
-
.-
-
..
-
-.
-
-
-
-
-_
-_
._
I.
......
_
.,
. .
.
.
82-a)
-b)
What is your husband's
(wife's)
How often does he (she) attend
religion?
church (synagogue)?
t-b)
0
(Y/10)
ROMAN(24T5iOLIC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UNITED Ch-URCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ANGLICAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PRESBYTERIAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BAPTIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LDTHERAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UKRAINIAi~ (CBEEkk) CATHOLIC . . . . . . . . .
GREEKORTHODOX
.....................
JEbnSH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-............
OEIEFi PROTESTANU(STATE)
L.&L. %L,rLi- c&c&
&A
ALL OTHER(STATE) Q
-b)
84-a)
-b)
05
06
ONCEA MONTH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '3
07
08
oy
9.83-a
&.84-a
FATHER
@2/13)
04/15)
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
01
02
..........................
5 6ky
4ld.
somewhat' interested',
somewhat interested,
6.83-b
MOTHER
-
VERY MIJCH
INTERESTED . . . . . . .
Q.84-b
-FATHER
.. .
16-1
17-l
03
SOMEWHAT
INTERESTED . . .
2
......
2
05
06
07
08
oy
DIDN'T PAY MUCH
ATTENTION . . . . . . . . . . .
3
......
3
CAN'T REMEMBER. . . . . . . .
4 ... ... 4
04
5
lfzqLA&(mzw5
G-2 Q so
f?
NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 000
What proportion of your friends
the same religion
as you?
4
ooes
MOTHER
020
2
A FEW TIMES A YEAR OR LESS . . . . .
What was your father's
religion
when you were g-rowing up?
Do you remember whether he was very much interested
in his religion,
or didn't pay much attention
to it?
CAN'T REMEI~LBER
...............
11-l
2 OR 3 TIMES MONTHLY. . . . . . . . . . .
What was your mother's religion
when you were growing up?
Do you remember whether she was very much interested
in her religion,
or didn't pay much attention
to it?
ROMANCATEIOLIC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01
UNITED CYURCB................
02
ANGLICAN' .....................
03
04
PRESBYTERIAN.................
05
BAPTIST ......................
LUTHERAN.....................
06
07
UKF'AINIAN (GREEK) CATHOLIC ...
GREEKORTHODOX
..............
. 08
JEWISH .......................
09
OlXER PROTESTANT(STA?E)
, J-&A4 c&CL
ALL OTHER(STATE)
85.
AT LEAST WEEKLY. . . . . . . . . . . . .
04
NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83-a)
01
02
03
c
have
000
0x0
18-l
ALL ..............
2
ALMOSTALL ..........
HALF ................
3
4
LESS T.&III HALF ......
'j
ALMOSTNONE .........
DON'T KNOW..........
6 7/?cJ.-il4-
09/20)
86-a)
In what county
were you born?
CAN4DA .........................
BRITISH ISLES ..................
Cm;~xN ........................
HUNGARY........................
ITALY ..........................
NETIIERI~IIDS (I!OLLAND) .........
PoIs!rn .........................
RUSSIA .........................
OTriZll Eili~O?~:XiI.................
UNITED S?'h';'ES ..................
ALL OTlii~:l~
........................
to1
02
GO TO O.r,7J
03
04
05
06
07
00
09
10
11
12 /q?l.&
__
_ _-.
-- --.-.--- --...
.
-.
- ..---._-- .-._
___._
_ ____
_____
---.A--:----_.--.
_
;.---_I
_____
___
RORli
OI,'T;TDF:
oi:.CAPI&DA
ASK:
IF RESPO:WXlTC!AS
36-b)
In
what
year
did
you
come
to
live
in
Canada?
(WRITE
IN
PRECISE
YEAR)
2122-
da
- _ __
..
.
C6R
_
.
J/4-27.
IF IOT SUREOF EMCT
--
YEAR.
SAY:
Was
f
it
between
1960
between 1946
between
1939
or before 1939y
and
1968?
. . . . . . . . . . . ..
23-1
and1960? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
and 1945? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5p&-L+-3h.
..
: 87-a)
-'
I
Please tell me from what country
most of your ancestors came.
(24/25)
CANADA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BRITISH ISLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GERMANY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HUNGARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ITALY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JAPAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MEXICO '...........".....,.....
'ximmm1~m5
(H0LLh;i~)&+y
POLAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..i.......
SCANDINAVIAN COWi'RIES,
(sI~IEDEIJ, NOR:VAY,FI~AND,
...................
mm
(SPECIFY)
.
/
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
---.
..-
-..
.- -
.
&A
c3
___. -... --- ----_ --
..---...-_...
-.-..-.
. .
$7-b)
--.
- --------__
-- -- ----
.-..._.
.._~_
.
- _
_ ._______________._-_
----._- -_ _--..-_--_.. --- -.
_. -.-_.
._._.___.._
(ASK ALL THOSE 'irHO IIEMIONED CANADAOK U.S.A. IN Q. 87-a)
And before
where did most of your ancestors come from?
sL.7d
U-ALCh
f!&
f~cliZLU'@&LdC-iAOl
,
.
&L rl.58. 0-Z..
-... 88-a)
What language
do you speak most often
at home?
- -..:.
-
t?.53P~
..
._._.__--._____._.--.-.- - ..__ -. --__----.-. --
ENGLISH.................
that,
(
25-
1
2728-1
FRENCH.....................
2
OTHEIR(SPECITY)
-
-.--
--.-.-.
i
: -- .--- ‘-. _. . . - _ _ 9
__.
. . .o
88-b)
89-a)’
_
Do you speak any other
Which language
language
do you speak most
at home?
yEs ......................
NO.......................
”
u ...
29-l
a(GLISH..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30-1
Fp&pTC
. 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
OTHER (sPzx3Y)
___.._
_-..-
-._
-----.--------T
--._ _.
'Cl
- ..-
90.
__--.
Do you speak any other
87-b)
.
.-=- -_--.--..------
IF "YES" ASK:
language
--~.-_------~__.---------
-....
at work?
-
--
..--..-
_____
.___.
-_-
--.-
-.
.-..
-
-I-;=-
......... .. .. .........
_ .__.
0
Which one?
:
What language
friends?
do you usually
speak with
your
_..
FRENCH..................
..
.__ _.
__
_._
32-1
ENGLISH....................
2
OTHER (SPECIM)
During most of your school years,
whcm did you live - mostly in a
city or suLurb, mostly in a villa@
or small tovn, or mostly on a farm?
MOSTLY CITIES OR SUJWRES. . . . . . . . . . .
Q, $1 A? 4 CN cc fv 3+45-
7&
[ &/ '.?,I::., y,7T '/q
L'
II
'( so ,-A (1"/
0
33-1
MOSTLY IN VILLAGE(S) OR
5'XBLL TOlfiI(S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOSTLY ON IM.l'W(S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- ----
"
2
4
,’
.
,‘>q
CI
‘.
,‘.
.
.-.--
cnuf~o”~
.
.-...---
_ ---_-.
-- -.----
. .._ .-.--..--..._.-._...-.
-
-_. .
_
-b).
---..
_-.
.-....
__
__ 959w
- .__._
YES::
........................
I have' just three more things to ask
you about. First, did you watch the
TV 'Jdebatell among the leaders before
the election?
95-a)
.._ .-
66-l
. ...................
NO.........
.................
DON' T REU.ENBER
fv
CAOUETTE........, ..........
Who gained most in your eyes as a
-result of the debate?
_
DOUGLAS
.......................
STANFIELD..............;
6’7-1
2
......
3
4
...........
CAOUE?TEAND DOUGLAS
T.?~DENJAND~~E~THER.. .......
STANFIELD AND ON%OTHXR.......
5
TRUDEAU
.......................
_ _
.
I
6
7
OTHER
.........................
n-r--
-c)
------
%&a'didyou
_.--
..-
---
like-least?.
8
9 0 II
KIN'T IQ'0W....................
c.:--
:A-.-L-;
-.- I
---_. .
...................
CAOLJEXTE
DOUGLAS
.......................
STA??IELD.....................
68-l
--_
- _----_
3
4
CAOLi3Yi3 AtID DOUGUS..........
TRUDEAUAND ONX OTHER.........
STANFIELD AND ONE OTEW.......
-_
CXUIEX
.........................
....................
DON'T KNOW
-.
....
-.
DO you think that the election
resultshol-n.J
that French Canadians in Quebec largely
_ support Mr. Trudeau's ideas on the
constitution?
97.
.
BASIC DATA:
---.-_..
_
-J-&LL.0 ........................
NO............................
DON'TJii6W ..........
-a);.: 1d:there bore t&-&e
-.
.-'T ._:.__.' YES..;...
-b).-
a&e on this
5
6
7
8
...
- __---.
..-.
...........
property?
Kc-0
(IF YES) Iast year, ‘did you sell more than
of products grown or raised
:_ $50 worth
this. ‘property?
YES........
0
99.
Respondcntrs
home telephone
NO........
2
3 4,qEM
A CObn,mITy OF LESS TM
NO.....
I
9 0 u
-
-- _- - _
_
IF TICS HOUSEHOLD
IS LOCATEDIN A RURALAREA (i.e.
1,000 POPUL4.TIOET
OR IN OPENCOmRY) ASK:'
98.
.
2
TRUDEAU......; ................
--.
.._
4110&-
;
.
on
0
number /x. '#
I
@-deA
-
NO DHCNF
2. . . . . . . . . , cl
.,~‘!i~~~~~~S .._..___.. ..-_-.._._._
._.-_-_I . _ -__.__.
-.
.
aoi;
__...
.
_ __.- _-. _ -.__.-. -. - . - -.-..-....-- - .- . _ In what language did respondent
ENGLISH.......
answer the questionnaire?
NO ASSISTANCE IN LANGUAGEFROMOTHERS.......
75’-1
ASSISTED IN UNGUAGE BY'SOmONE ELSE...........
OTHER. (ClRCLE CODEAND ZPECIFY) J2i?+JiL
Translated'by
.
eh_Cd
3
whom?
.
iii.
Dans quelle
lanme
le.rGpondant
a-t-i1
.
r6pondu au questionnaire?
FRANCAISE . . . . . . . . . SANS L'AIDE D'UN INTERPRETE . . . . . . . . . . . .75-4
AVEC L'AIDE D'UN INTERF'RETE. . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
AUTFLE (EIKERCLE~ CODEET SFJECIFIEZ)
Traduit
.-
11
6
par qui?
_:_
,-cm----.--
SFE?FT
I 1 FOR QUESTIONS93 AmI 94
c&e 7L -
What is'your
i
" 77-
age?
What is the date of your birthday?
DAY " -4~‘ 2%%-&4?
:.
II
cc
.MONl'II
.----- - .-.
.-. -
*
1 i&k
__
_
_.
.
----
---_
OK
.
____...__
_.____..,--._ ...1....._. . _
.-___
--__-
_.__..,._.__ _. 6?5-~:‘4’
__._
.
-_
---.-I--.-
--
-;
.__
2...
_ Into which of the following
groups did
Se total incme for you- fainily fall last
year (before taxes)?
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
_
K.
____
- ,-_- -_ _--- __._-.---.--.-__-- --.-- .--.-,.-
.-_.
.--
. _._..-__ __ . .._._-__
. . .. . ---.
-.-.
_
A.
B.
-.
_..
._--..-_
._--.
._... ...____ -..
__
_,
.
.. .
.
. .. . -.. . . . -- .-._. -_. ._.._
-..
.-_ -_ .__.
. __ _
UNDER $1,000
$ 1,000 to S 1,999
q; 2,000 to s
2,999
t 3,000 to 3 3,999
$ 4,000 to 'S 4,999
$ 5,000 to s
S 6,000 to S ~y;~;
$ 7,000 to s 7:999
$ 8,000 to 3 ?,YPY
s10,000 to s14,999
$15,000 or over
--. __ -_.--.- ._.-_... .-.-
. . -. .-._-_--. .-- ..-.__....-..._..._. - ._...._ ._-._.
.
cl 2
;;
cl 5
:
cl 9
0"704-/
_ -._ .
.-._ . ..--_..
..
I
_
-
._- ._ . . - _._.-- . . . . 9.. ,-
-
__
‘:_ _
q c
0 3
07
_
.
,__
07%-l
._-... ..-.- -_..
..^ _
,. . _ . _ . . .
_... . _
.
__
-.-
.
(I
.
;..;
_ -77
.:
_-.... - _.-..---- .- . -.. .- -...... .-.. -_ ..-- sew
-;.T-.--
_ . _.
._ _ _
.
..-
-
_
_
__
---
------
--_---_..~-_-~-_-
--L.----..L.:I-..-;;
--..
_._-__
.__L_.
;
-
(TURN TO PAGE TWOON WHITE SHEETS) NOW I have a different
kind of question for you.
I'm going to show you some word pairs.
Each pair is separated by seven boxes like
political
party is very modern,
For example, if you think that the particular
this.
If you feel
you would put a check mark in the box on the right'end
of the scale.
it is very out-of-date,
you would check the box on the left end of the scale.
Or you might rate it somewhere between these two extremes.
29.
^_.._
-.
In some cases you may have only a very general idea of how to rate the
So please
having your impression.
party.
Even so, we would appreciate
try to check a cquare in each line.
, we'll start with an imaginary political
party - the one
you would consider the ideal for Canada.
_
-a)First
_.
.:
-
-d) Now let's
go on to some of Canada's federal
Fmx LINE AND
COMPLETES-Y
APPLICABLE ShEET
parties.
MAKE SURE TIIAT RESPONDENTAN%ERS
PLUS PAGES 6 OR 7 WHEREAPPLICABLE:
._
-
.
SI1EETFOR QUESTION29
_:
"
THEIDEAL PARTY
..
I
'OR OFFICE USE
ONLY
...
OUT OF DATE
COMPETEW
-2
POwmFUL
;,I
FOR THEMIDDIE CLASS
MODERN
lo-
WEAK
ll-
FOR TKE WORi(INGCLAS:
UNITED
SPLIT
BAD
GOOD
.
in.3JLEFT WING
HONEST
DULL
YOUNG
/
INCOMPETmT
12wl4-
RIGHT WING
15-
DISHONEST
1.6-
EXClTING
17-
OLI-
18-
UNCOI:CE%lEDFOR
PEOI'lJ:'s WZLPAR
z
19-
GGODFOR
CANADIAN UlIITy
BAD FOR
CAIIADIAII UIITTY
20-.
t\'$ RELICTOUS
1,.
NON-RELTCIOIJS
21-
CONCERNED
FOR
PEOPLE'S I%LFARE
(
-
‘3-.
c,.ch~
=IzSHEET
-
FOR QUESTION 29 ---
f
.
.._---I
- -
s=
D./l
_ -----~------_._
~_-__-____
__
.
_.
3 = #q. r/l&.
- ...
. .
._
-- .-
LIBFmL
OUT OF DATE
._
--_______
..-.-.-.. ___.
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
PARTY
22-
b
b
6
6
6 ?l &
MODERN
COMPZTENT !I
6
b
6
6 B a
iNCOMPEmNT
23-
WEAK
24-
POkERFuL c!l &is
'_
.- -.
‘&?5?W
. __ _._ _ _.__ _ __.. __ .
-. . .. .
!s
FORTHEMIDDLE, CLASS' aEd;l;
&s
d '0 tl
'FOR THE WORKINGCLASS
252627-
"
2s
29-
.
30-
3132.
. _
GOODFOR
CANADIAN IJNITY
12
3Y
coucoou
s-l
7
BAD FOR
CANADIAN UNITY
RELIGIOUS
I5 6 6 ?I Oc 6 7a NON-RELIGIOUS
.' ___-_ - .__._ _. _... -_. ., ._
L ___.. -.._._.. __^_
. ..I-..
_ . _- ____
FOR.QlKSTION
29
t
.- .
SHEET
33___. - - .
PROGRESSIVE-CONSERVATIVE
PARTY
34.
. .- .
. __._ .
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
353637FOR THE FIIDDLE CLASS
UNITED
SPLIT
BAD
GOOD
LEFl' WING
HONEST
DULL
38-
FOR TEE CIOR%INGCLASS
j940-
RIGiiT :*JlZiG
il-
DISI!OIv%ST
4243-
EXCITING
YOUNG
44-
CONCERNEDFOR
l-ZOFLS'S VELE'ARF,
45-
'GCODFOR
CANADIAN UNITY
' R~LJCTOUS
IiAn FOR
CAiIADTAII KIITY
46-
NON-RELICTOUS
47-
:
.
;1
&JO7
---SHEET
--
‘-*,,
FOR QUESTION29
-FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
OUT OF DATE
I
COMPETENT
4s
_
51-
_
POlrpiRFUL
FORTHEMIDDLE CLASS
UNITED
52-
BAD
I
;4-
LEFI' WING
HONEST
is-
56-
DULL
I
YOUNG
57-
ONCERUEDFOR
PEOgLE'S KELFARE
58-
GCODFOR
CANADIAN UNITY
5960-
RELIGIOUS
___
.‘.
-_..
_,.-_
-.1.-
_.-
.._.__.
_ __.
._
'
.:
.
53-
(
IN
THE PROVINCE OF QZ3EC
.
1 .- .--.
J-‘/
,dt,,&
J
--..
Ldd.
L
.
SHE22 FOR QUESTION 29
RALLIEMENT DES CPEDITISTES
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
6263646566.67686s
?O-
717273-
-.
I
.'- -SHEET FOR Q~STIOIT
29
c s g.l/ d 8 ’ . -
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY'
- .-_-_,
YloPOhmFUL
_. -
-.d‘L-I - .A’
.
.__-_._._-.,-----
FOR
THE
- --- M-q&E
ll-
CLAS,:$
: . ..
-_ . .. . .
-.
--
?I 6
;f
6
-" FOR
-' THE WORKING
- - CLASS
6- :!
12-
.-,
_-_,
__.._.
-,
,
-:
13--‘
,.-:- --~ 14-
.- - -^- ..,
* - -- ..
-. . -.- I
-’
17-
L.
--
:
l
._
.
!
-.
YOUNG
4
z
6
%
66-b
.
,
-
;i.CONCET-$JED.FOR
FEOPLE'S:b:LFtiE
p-- ,--1.
._ .
GOODFOR
p.-TANADIAN -UNITY
,._ -._...
t-r--- 'T1Ei;GIOUS
r-'r-L. -
_. .-__
,
-- y-y-
-7 .__.-+c-i--_:.___
-..L
..L..--.-
-_._-_._-_--
.._-
L.-
...‘~
.
--..
-
-
_---.._
NON-REL.IGIOUS
_. _..-_
_._
L..:;;..-r.-.~--+;..-r
-1
_..I
.
-_.
-
-
---_
.,
.
_ -
_.
.
t
.
.
-.
_,
._-
.
.-:.
..--
..---
._.I_
. .
-
-.-
_
L
!
;-
.
.._
_
-!-
_
._
y
l:j.:
,:.“..,.I::.
-
-
-.
.._
:
.
_._
.
-.
..-
.
-.-.
.
-_
.-
-._
-
-i-
-
.:.
-
,.
.
..
-
.
-
_--
.
.
r’
i--.
,
;.:
:
>y
-.
;
T
-
.
-
.
-_-
_..
‘.
!
.-_
‘-
_.-_
-I
:..
---
.L_
-_--.
.
----.-_
_
-_.
r
_.-
L
_
.
_
I
,
,*
.-.
.-..,!-
L8-:
.om
-.e..-__-
.r.
-__-_ .-
__._.
(
\._
,.
---.-.
-.
-..
-
.
-.
.
.
_
_
.
-
_.
j
-..
-
_
.
-
-...
__
‘.
L- -.
..-
!
- -.
,-- ..-A.
.- - ,_
r.__
._
-
-.-.
_-_-
-
-
-.
_
-
.
.
-;
‘i
_---
._
-i_
>-
I
.:.
.
.
. .
-
.-
-.-
-
.
._
-
.~
-
-
._
-.
.
_,--
.
-
.
.
-_-_.
_
:.
-..
--L-e-
_
-
_
.
. .
_--
.
.
.
i
_
-.
!
--_..
L -
._.
_
.i
.
:.
Irz:-<
-,-.:-:
i.
,.--
.._.
.“-.-’
:.*.
c.
.I
-.-::i’:.-.--
__..
c:
.::
x:
I-..
..::
-.
-___-._
.-.:.:.
‘::...-.
--
-_.
:
:I-
_
-!
-.-;
-...
-
,.
*-
_.
-...
;
,-,--_.
‘..
c
_-
-
._._
. .
_
f---.
-.
,
.-.
-
_
.
_
_
-
.
_.
-
__,_
_
-.--,
-
-...:.
.
_
;
-
_-
-
.
_
__.__
.’
_.
__
:
_-
.-
-.-
-:
...
-.-
_
._
.
.
-
-
_.
_
..
-
i
:
,
<.
--‘.
-_
.
.L--.
.
.-
--
--
r
,
‘.
---_
--
.
60.
.
.-
In an earlier
question we asked you to indicate
how you felt about some aspects of our
political
parties by givirle
thz-n a score or nark bctwcen 0 and 100. 1"d now like,you
to show in the same way how you feel about certain
of people.
Here again is the
(POINT TO.
so-called
"feeling
thermometer" which may help you to reach a decision.
PAGE 9 ON WHITE SHEETS)
Again, if you like a group very much, give it a mark close to 100, if you dislike
it
strongly,
move close to 0 and if you don't feel particularly
warm or cold toward it,
Would you please read this list
of names
or if you don't know, place it in the middle.
of various groups and write down your score for each.
groups
cd&4
EO fi
77.
'.
SHEET FOR QUESTION60_
:
‘.
_,
..
./
LIKE VERY MUCH
START RERE AND Go E THE LIST
i
I
RATING
llergymen
light
'NO FEELINGS
_.
2324-
25
Wingers
26-
French Canadians
2728-
Whites
$1
Roman Catholics
3132-
Russians
$1
Labour Unions
3s
36-
Finglishmen
$1
Policemen
A
Z;r
People whose ancestors
come from countries
other than Britain
or France
4142-
Big Business
4344-
Jews
4546-
Americans
$1
49-
50-
Protestants
Left
5152-
Wingers
Military
53545556-
Negroes
5758-
Atheists
5960-
English
DISLIKE VERY MUC
FOR OFFICE
USE 01&Y
Canadians
),.,, ,- - _
.
,’
I,
,ovi
-
Now that we've looked at some
poups,
I would like you to show your feelings
about a
TOWind ividl;!l s whose names are listed
on the next pap, again using our "feeling
(POINT TO PAGE 10 OF WIXTE SHEETS)
thermometer".
_ ._
--
61.
-_
‘-I
_ __. ..-
.SHEET 5OR QUESTION 61
.,
-_
. LIKE VERY Mucx
RATING
Pearson
Ontarib's
Premier
Robarts
Lester
...
Marcel Fapbault
U.S. President
Lyndon Johnson
#I
General de Gaulle
Dalton
Camp
Rend Levesque
Newfoundland's
Premier
Joey
Smallwood
.NO FEELINGS
John G.
Diefenbaker
Quebec's Premier
Daniel Johnson
-3
Saskatchewan's
Premier Thatcher
DISLIKE V?XY MICH
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
loll12-'
13141536-s
1718-'
1920212223-
242526272829-
&‘-%A
-
Il
_
-_
.-_...
_
6y.
_.-.
._
_._.__
--.
,
;
.
_
.-.
.-
lz5.93~
--~.-~
--=r-------
-_---------___
.;
_.
LI.
..I
..__.
‘L
.-.:.
_
__
._...
.
..-
..-.
Now, Just once more I'd like to use something like the "feeling
thermometer."
This
time, however, I'd like you to give a mark to various political
offices not on the
basis of whether you Like them or not but on the basis of how important%
think
they are.
If, for-example,
we were to talk about building
inspectors,
and you thought that
they were terribly
important,
you'd give them a high score near 100. If you thought
they were not very important,
you'd give them a low mark near 0.
__ .-.
(POINT TO PAGZ 12 ON WHITE SHEETS) Here are the offices
I am interested
in:
Just
e;o through them as you did with the question about individuals
and groups and mark
down your score beside each.
-..,
_.
.
&&apj
c&f
00 Js 79
--. _ ____--. -._-. ..-- _.-- -.- -- - __ ___-...--
--
&,I
+2
--
10-3 = 97
02
L SAEET FOR 'WESTION 69
.,
PLEASE WRITE I?i YOURANS\~%!lS
UIRlWl'LY ON THIS SHEET
AND CX W THE LIST
VEFiY IMPORTANT
RATING
Members Of Parliament
Ottawa
In
3233-e
Members Of Provincial
Legislatures
The Prime Minister
we
Provincial
70”
Federal
Provincial
60°
of Canada
Premiers
Cabinet
Ministers
Cabinet
Ministers
The Governor General
4647-
Your,Local
Go
Mayor
Civil
$1
5051-
Servants
Judes
5253-
Armed Forces
5455-
The Police
5657-
The Supreme Couzt
5859..,;.,t f :., .,<
3o”
--)
.
--:
-fr
..
-.
-.
O0
:;I
4-b
45-.
Federal
10”
3435323738394041-
The Queen
5o”
@f
?OR OFFICE
USE ONLY
VERY UNIMl'ORTA:PT
l-1:/-
I
,
I.
_‘
MASTER CODE BOOK (Oct./71
addendum)
Card 12:
1-6 : Same as cards
7-8 : 12
9-10 : B'lank
~01s.
Cols.
Cols.
White part
94.
of questionnaire,
1 to 11.
p.13:
Into which of the followinq
groups
did the total
income for your family
year (before taxes)?
fall
A.
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
II.
I.
J.
K.
125%
Cols.
UNDER $1,000
$ 1,000 to $ 1,999
$ 2,000 to $ 2,999
$ 3,000 to $ 3,999
$ 4,000 to $ 4,999
$ 5,000 to $ 5,999
$ 6,000 to $ 5,999
$ 7,000 to $ 7,999
$ 8,000 to $ 9,999
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 or over
Refused
No answer
Dont't know
Questionnaire
missing
11-12
1
: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
c
Green part
94.
of questionnaire,
ESTIFiATED INCOXE: $
0.27:
Cols.
13-14
:Same as Cols.
Cols.
15-80
:Blank
11-12