Reports for Schools in Folsom Cordova Unified School District (2013-14)
No emergency facility needs/sufficient textbooks
Emergency facilities needs or textbook insufficiency
Emergency facilities need/textbook insufficiency has been addressed
School Name
Review Date
Cordova Gardens
Elementary
8/27/13
Cordova Villa Elementary
8/29/13
Rancho Cordova
Elementary
8/27/13
W.E. Mitchell Middle
8/30/13
White Rock Elementary
9/4/13
Williamson Elementary
8/16/13
Textbooks
Facilities
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
607
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Cordova Gardens Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Tom Adams
PART III:
NUMBER
9:00AM
Sunny and warm
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
22
Jim Bonovich
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
19
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Coordinator
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/27/2013
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-6
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
ROOFS
H. EXTERNAL
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
22
21
22
19
22
22
20
10
20
22
22
22
22
22
22
Number of D’s
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
12
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 90.48% 100.00% 100.00% 90.91% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
90.48%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
90.91%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
97.67%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Good
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
620
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Cordova Villa Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Mary Fager
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
8/29/2013
Warm and sunny
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
NUMBER
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
14
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Director
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
PART III:
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-5
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
H. EXTERNAL
ROOFS
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
14
13
14
13
14
14
13
5
13
13
14
14
13
14
14
Number of D’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
9
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
100.00%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Exemplary
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
606
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Rancho Cordova Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Tom Adams
PART III:
NUMBER
10:00PM
Sunny and warm
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
18
Jim Bonovich
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
20
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Coordinator
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/27/2013
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-6
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
ROOFS
H. EXTERNAL
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
18
17
18
16
17
18
17
6
16
18
18
18
18
17
18
Number of D’s
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
12
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 94.12%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
94.44%
100.00% 94.44% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
94.12%
97.22%
94.44%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
98.22%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Good
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
618
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
W.E. Mitchell Middle School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Mary Fager
PART III:
NUMBER
9:00AM
Warm and sunny
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
26
Jim Bonovich
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Director
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/20/2013
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
6-8
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
H. EXTERNAL
ROOFS
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
26
25
26
25
26
26
25
9
15
25
26
25
25
26
26
Number of D’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
17
11
1
0
1
1
0
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
100.00%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Exemplary
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
621
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
White Rock Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Mary Fager
PART III:
NUMBER
9:00AM
Warm and sunny
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
17
Jim Bonovich
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
21
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Director
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
9/4/2013
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-6
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
H. EXTERNAL
ROOFS
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
17
16
17
16
17
17
16
7
15
16
17
17
16
17
17
Number of D’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
10
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
100.00%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Exemplary
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
538
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Williamson Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Jonathan Moyer
PART III:
NUMBER
10:00 AM
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
i
20
Jim Bonovich, Andrew Smith
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
19
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Project Specialist
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/22/2013
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-5
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
H. EXTERNAL
ROOFS
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of Ps
20
15
20
15
20
20
19
7
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Number of D’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
5
0
5
0
0
1
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE
g
100.00%
SCHOOL RATING *
g
Exemplary
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
The facility was built in the 1960’s but was renovated about 5 years ago. The atmosphere is pleasant and park-like. The facilities, especially the restrooms and playgrounds are clean and still look
new. The grounds suffer from vandals from time to time, but are maintained meticulously by the school and district staff.
W.E. Mitchell Middle School
(Folsom Cordova Unified School District)
2013-2014 Textbook Insufficiency Report
The Sacramento County Office of Education Williams reviewers determined the
following insufficiencies during their inspection of the school:
Rooms 24, 26, and 27
1
Insufficient number of instructional materials as evidenced by the following deficiencies:
Subject Area
7th Grade Spanish
Title
Aventura 1a, EMC Publishing, 2013
Students Without
236
Subject Area
8th Grade Spanish
Title
Aventura 1b, EMC Publishing, 2013
Students Without
250
We understand that 236 each Aventura 1a and 250 each Aventura 1b, Student
Editions are on order.
The Education Code provides school districts the opportunity to remedy
deficiencies found during the Williams review. The county superintendent is
responsible to ensure that any deficiency is remedied within the first eight weeks
of the school term.2 If, it is not remedied, the county superintendent is required to
request that the California Department of Education purchase the needed
textbooks or instructional materials for the school with the purchase treated as a
loan to the district.
1
Education Code section 1240(i) requires the county superintendent of schools to
enforce the use of state textbooks regularly adopted by the proper authority and
defines sufficient textbooks as each pupil, including English learners, has a textbook
or instructional materials, or both, to use in class and to take home.
2
Education Code section 1240(i)(4)(C) requires remediation of a deficiency no later
than the second month of the school term.