Modern Physics Classical Mechanics Galileo and Newton assumed that the laws of physics applied in all iner9al frames, frames of reference that are NOT accelera9ng or rota9ng, and they were right. Even though they were both aware that mo9on was rela9ve, they believed that the laws would apply regardless. Space was believed to be fixed so 9me and distances were constants. Nineteenth century scien9sts believe that there was a transparent background, “ether”, of space that light traveled in. So they assumed that since mo9on was rela9ve so too would the speed of light be rela9ve. They believed that the speed that Maxwell calculated was rela9ve to the ether of space. Example: My mo9on on Earth measured by you verses my mo9on measured by a person on the moon. Einstein’s Theory of Special Rela9vity However, in the late 19th century James Maxwell came up with the speed of all electromagne9c radia9on to be a constant of c = 3X108 m/s in all reference frames. In other words, they proved that the speed of light was NOT rela9ve. It did not seem to follow the law of rela9vity. Michelson‐ Morley did experiments that proved light’s speed did not change no maWer what the iner9al reference frame and this was referred to as the “null result”. Postulates of the Special Theory of Rela9vity In 1905, Einstein proposed that there was no absolute reference frame, “ether”, that was at rest in the fabric of space. Space was not the constant. He proposed two postulates: 1st(the rela9vity principle) The laws of physics have the same form in all iner9al reference frames. 2nd(constancy of the speed of light) Light propagates through empty space with a definite speed c independent of the speed of the source or observer. Time Dila9on *Δt = Δt o 2 v 1− 2 c = Δt 0γ γ = 1 v2 1− 2 c This factor so common in relativity that we give it a special symbol One consequence of special rela9vity is that 9me is no longer a constant and depends on the frame € of reference. Time dila9on says that clocks moving rela9ve to an observer are measured by that observer to run more slowly, as compared to clocks at rest rela9ve to the observer. Notice that as you approach the speed of light the denominator of the fraction approaches zero and the time dilation approaches infinity! Length Contrac9on v2 *L = Lo 1− 2 c Lo or L = γ Not only does 9me dilate but lengths and distances shrink. Since c is constant and the space ship measures a shorter 9me then the distance must be short also, c (v)=x/t, for the speed of light to remain constant. The length of an object is measured to be shorter when it is moving rela9ve to the observer that when it is at rest. However, this is only when the object and observer are moving parallel to each other NOT perpendicular. A rocket is moving away from the Earth at a speed of .8c. If an hour passes on the clock on the rocket, how much time would have passed on a clock on Earth? slower, at about 0.6 times the rate of the clocks at rest Rela9vis9c Momentum and Mass As a par9cle speeds up its momentum and mass increase. According to the following equa9ons: p = γmov and mrel = γmo However, be careful, a mass does not acquire more par9cles or molecules as it speeds up. Most physicists believe it only appears to. Mass and Energy 2 *E=mc *1u = 931.5 MeV € −13 1MeV =1.60 ×10 J In his famous equa9on Einstein deduced that because of special rela9vity that the old equa9on for kine9c energy would have to be changed in order to account for rela9vis9c considera9ons and derived mathema9cally his equa9on that linked energy and mass. What is the equivalent energy, in MeV, when a proton is converted into pure energy? The mass of a proton is 1.6726 X 10-27 Kg. Discovery of the Electron J.J Thompson and his student Robert Millikan are credited for the discovery and es9ma9on of the charge of an electron. Thompson used a cathode ray tube to determine the charge to mass ra9o of an electron and then Millikan used his oil‐drop experiment to determine the numerical mass of the droplet and its charge individuality. JJ Thompson The magnetic force acts as the centripetal force because it causes the charges to bend. In addition the velocity selector uses the balance of the electric and magnetic force to counter act one another. This is how he calculated it: Fmagnetic = Fcentripetal 2 mv e v evB = ∴ = r m Br € Felectric = Fmagnetic E eE = evB∴v = The call this the velocity selector equation B e E = 2 m Br € Millikan then performed his oil drop experiment to calculate the mass and charge of the electron. qE = mdrop g ∴ q = mdrop g E So Millikan could calculate the charge of the electron from his experiment and then used Thompson’s experiment to calculate the mass. € Planck’s Quantum Hypothesis; Black Body Radia9on −3 −34 *E = hf where h = 6.63×10 J • s 2.90 ×10 m•K λp = T As an object heats up it gives off radia9on. At lower temperatures this radia9on is in the infra‐red range so we can feel the heat but cannot see it. As it gets hoWer the radia9on is at higher frequencies un9l it is in the visible range. First red, then orange, blue, and then white hot at the highest frequency. He also proposed that this experiment showed that the energy of these waves was quan9zed, it was mul9ples of some fundamental quan9ty, and related it to the frequency of the radia9on. What is the energy of a photon of red light with a wavelength of 700 nm? Photon Theory of Light and the Photoelectric Effect When light hits metals it can eject electrons. This is called the photoelectric effect. Einstein, building on Planck’s idea of quan9zed energy, explained the photoelectric effect from a par9cle theory of light and named these par9cles of light ‐ Photons. In 1913‐1914, Millikan performed experiments that matched Einstein’s predic9on of light as a par9cle and showed that the wave theory of light predic9ons were incorrect for this phenomenon. E photon = hf E kin = hf − Φ = hf − hf o Equa9ons Photoelectric Effect *KE max = hf − W o (φ ) Stopping Poten9al The poten9al to stop the flow of electrons. Whatever energy that the electrons would ajer being ejected is equal to the stopping poten9al. € *KE max = eVo Draw a graph that represents the KE as a function of frequency Draw a graph that represents the KE as a function of the intensity of incident light Wave Verse Par9cle Predic9on Wave Theory Photon Theory A)This theory would predict A)This theory predicted that that as the light intensity as the intensity increased increased, the number of the number of ejected electrons ejected and electrons should increase their KE would increase. but their KE should not be B)The frequency of the light effected.(E=hf) should not affect the KE B) As the frequency was energy of the electrons. increased the maximum KE would increase and that there should be some minimum threshold frequency to eject the electrons. Energy, Mass, and Momentum of a Photon E hf h *p = = = c c λ Since a photon travels at the speed of light it is a rela9vis9c par9cle. If then Einstein’s equa9ons are applied then the photon has a rest mass of zero. The result is that a photon’s momentum is directly related to its energy. A photon has a momentum of p and a wavelength the wavelength doubles, what will happen to the momentum? € λ. If Compton Effect h λ′ = λ + (1− cos φ ) moc In addi9on to the photoelectric effect another experiment done by A.H. Compton, 1923, also supported the photon theory of light. € He scaWered x‐rays off of various materials and found that the resul9ng x‐rays had a slightly lower frequency which meant some energy had been lost in the collision. He explained it using the photon theory of light. Photon Interac9ons; Pair Produc9on When photons pass through maWer they produce maWer and an9maWer. When the photon hits the maWer it will produce an electron and a positron. This is an example of energy conver9ng into maWer. Positrons usually do not hang around in nature because they can combine with electrons and annihilate each other forming photons of energy. This principle is used in PET scans. h h *λ = = p mv Wave Nature of MaWer In 1923, Louis de Broglie, proposed that if light has a wave/par9cle duality then maWer should also. Ordinary objects have wavelengths that are very small. So in everyday life it is difficult to see their wave nature. However electrons, and other subatomic par9cles, move fast enough, and have a small enough mass, that their wave nature can be detected because we can make diffrac9on gra9ngs with slits on the order of their wavelength and observe diffrac9on paWerns. C.J. Davisson and L.H. Germer scaWered electrons (par9cles of maWer) off a object and observed a regular paWern of interference peaks that Young’s wave theory predicts. The wavelength matched the predic9on of de Broglie’s equa9on. Which of the following experiments demonstrates the wave nature of mater: I. Millikan’s Oil Drop Experiment II. Planck’s Black Body Radiation III. Davisson and Germer’s Electron Scattering Experiment A) I only B) III only C)I and II D) I and III Rutherford In the 1897 electrons were discovered and by 1900 most scien9sts believed that maWer was made of atoms. However, the structure of the atoms was thought to be a posi9ve pudding like material with nega9ve charges implanted inside of it. This was J.J. Thomson’s Theory that he proposed in1904. In 1911, Ernest Rutherford did his famous gold foil experiment which showed that the atom was comprised of a dense core surrounded by mostly empty space and surrounded by electrons some distance away. Rutherford’s gold foil experiment proved which of the following postulates about the structure of the atom: I) The atom has a core with electrons orbiting around in discrete energy levels II) The atom has a dense central positive core III) The atom is mostly empty space A) I only B) III only C)I and II D) II and III Atomic Spectra: Key to the Structure of the Atom When you place a low density gas, rarefied, in a glass tube and pass a high voltage through it you will get a line Emission Spectra which is characteris9c of the element. When you pass a light source through the gas you will get a Absorp9on Spectrum. The fact that the spectra were dis9nct lines and not con9nuous lead to the discovery that electrons are in discrete energy levels around the nucleus or “quan9zed”. Bohr’s model of the atom accurately explains this phenomenon. These top three are Emission Spectra the bottom is an Absorption Spectrum −13.6eV *E n = 2 n Bohr Model He proposed that the electrons in an atom must be in only certain “allowed” orbits and that electrons cannot lose energy con9nuously but in discrete quantum jumps. While remaining in these states they did not give off radia9on which was a contradic9on of classical ideas because accelera9ng charges should give off EM radia9on. ( Mul9ple of Plank’s constant) He argued that electromagne9c radia9on was emiWed only when electrons in higher energy states fell to lower ones. He named the lowest energy level the ground state and all levels above that as excited states. The energy required to remove the electron from the ground state is called the binding energy or ioniza9on energy Here’s an example: A photon with an energy of 3 eV hits this atom and excites its outer electron. What are the possibly transitions that the electron can do? (Photons of what energies can be reemitted?) Don’t forget: 1eV = 1.6 X 10-19 J De Broglie’s Hypothesis Applied to Atoms Although the idea of exact Energy levels and Bohr’s equa9on for predic9ng their energy falls apart ajer Hydrogen it did lead to the next great step in our understanding of the atom, quantum mechanics. Although Bohr assumed quan9zed states of electrons he could give no reason. Ten years later de Broglie help him out by sta9ng that the electrons were wave‐like in nature and were actually standing waves. Therefore they didn’t have to follow the classical rules for par9cles. Quantum Mechanics of Atoms Although Bohr’s theory was a good beginning it fell apart for complex molecules and other fine details. In the 1920’s Erwin Schrodinger and Werner Heisenberg independently formed a new theory that resolved the problems called quantum theory. Even though we s9ll use classical physics to describe the macroscopic world, rela9vity to describe objects moving near the speed of the light, and quantum for the microscopic world, they all agree and we use whichever is the most easy for the given situa9on. The Wave Func9on: The Double‐ Slit Experiment If you pass electrons through two slits that is on the order of magnitude equal to their wavelength you will see a diffrac9on paWern. However, if you pass them through one slit you would see one bright band behind the slit as if they are par9cles. If we treat electrons as waves then , the wave Ψ func9on represents the amplitude of the wave and Ψ2 represents the probability of finding the electron. € € The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle h *(Δx)(Δp) ≥ = h = 1.055 ×10−34 J • s 2π According to quantum there is a natural limit to the accuracy of certain measurements. It is result of the wave‐par9cle duality and the unavoidable interac9on in observing. The act of observing produces an uncertainty in the posi9on and momentum because you can only get as accurate the wavelength of light being used. Quantum‐Mechanical View of Atom Although many ideas from Bohr are s9ll used, Quantum Theory deepens our understanding of nature. Electrons are now thought of as maWer waves so they are thought of as clouds of maWer spread out. The most sta9s9cally likely place to find them is equivalent to Bohr’s energy levels. Quantum Numbers Principle Quantum Number(n) Values 1 to infinity. The total energy depends on this number. Orbital Quantum Number(l) This is related to the angular momentum of the electron. Values range from 0 to n‐1 Magne9c Quantum Number(ml) This is related to the direc9on of the angular momentum. Values range from ‐l to +l Spin Quantum Number (ms) The electron can have two intrinsic states that split its energy. Values can be + /‐ 1/2 The Pauli Exclusion Principle It simply states that no two electrons can occupy the same quantum state. This principle helps us describe the electron configura9ons of more complex atoms and molecules. Quantum concepts are critical in explaining all of the following except: A) Rutherford’s Scattering experiments B) Bohr’s theory of the hydrogen atom C) Compton Scattering D) Blackbody Radiation E) The photoelectric effect Structure and Proper9es of Nucleus A nucleus is the dense center of an atom and contains protons and neutrons. A proton has a mass of 1.67262 X10‐27 kg = 1.007276 u and a posi9ve charge of 1.60 X10‐19 C. A neutron has a mass off 1.67493 X10‐27 kg = 1.008665 u and is electrically neutral. Collec9vely they are referred to as nucleons. The number of protons in a nucleus is called the atomic number(Z) and gives an atom its iden9ty. Memorize this conversion −27 1u = 1.6605 ×10 Kg = 931.5Mev /c € 2 The number of protons and neutrons is referred to as the atomic mass number(A) or simply mass number. The neutrons is the difference between the atomic and mass number. Atoms can have numerous Isotopes. Isotopes are atoms of the same element with different numbers of neutrons. The rela9ve amount of each isotope is called the natural abundance. Masses are also measure in unified atomic mass units(u). An element has an atomic number Z of 1. Although many of the atoms have zero number of neutrons, N, some have one or two neutrons. These different atoms are know as: A) Ions B) Nucleons C) Isotopes D) Gluons Binding Energy The total mass of a nucleus is always lees than the sum of the protons and neutrons individually. The mass of the protons and neutrons in a Helium atom is 4.0332980 while the measured mass is 4.002603 u. The difference is .030377 u which when you mul9ple by 931.5 MeV that equals 28.30 MeV of binding energy. The binding energy represent the energy needed to break it into its component parts. To find the the binding energy per nucleon you simply divide by the number of nucleons (A) The deuteron mass md is related to the neutron mass mn and the proton mass by mp by which of the following expressions? A) md= mn-mp B) md= mn+mp C) md=2( mn-mp) D) md= mn+mp-(mass equivalent to deuteron binding energy) E) md= mn+mp+(mass equivalent to deuteron binding energy) Radioac9vity Stable nuclei tend to have equal numbers of protons and neutrons.(Up to element 40‐ Zirconium) Ajer element 82(Lead) there are no completely stable nuclei. At this point the nucleus is too big for the strong force to hold together the atom and the repulsive EM force rips the nucleus apart. When this happens in nature it is called “Natural Radioac9vity” when man‐made it is “Ar9ficial Radioac9vity”. The higher the atomic number the more neutrons are needed to stablize the atom. Radioac9ve Decay There are three kinds of radioac9ve decay: Alpha, Beta, Gamma. In the process one element turns into another element and this is called transmuta9on. The original atom is called the parent and the new one is called the daughter. Alpha is the weakest of the three. It can be stopped by a piece of paper and is actually a ionized Helium atom. 4 2 +2 He = α Beta is the second strongest and could be stopped by a block of wood. It is simply an 0 − 0 + e = β or e = β electron (positron). −1 +1 Gamma is the strongest and takes 12 in of lead or 10 j of concrete to block. γ € Here are some examples: Alpha 226 88 222 86 Ra→ Rn+ He Beta 14 6 4 2 14 7 − C→ N + e + ν 19 10 19 9 + Ne→ F + e + ν Gamma 14 ∗ 6 14 6 C → C+γ Example: A neutron collides with 32 16 S and produces 1733Cl and another particle. The € other particle is A) € Proton B) Alpha Particle C) Beta Particle D) Neutron E) Deuteron Half‐Life and Rate of Decay .693 *T1 = where τ is the time constant 2 τ *N = N oe € t τ If they ask for the activity you just divide this equation by time Radioac9ve elements decay at a constant rate. Ojen instead of speaking of its decay constant we speak instead of it’s half life, or the 9me it take for 1/2 of the sample to decay. Radioac9ve Da9ng Any living organism contains a constant ra9o of Carbon‐14 and to Carbon‐12 un9l it dies. Carbon ‐14 has a half life of 5730 yr. So by looking at ancients remains of trees, poWery, and people the ra9o of C‐14 to C‐12 can tell us its age. Good up to 60,000 yrs. So obviously when talking about geological 9me this would not be useful. However, Uranium‐238 has a half‐life of 4.5 X109 yrs so this is used to date ancient rocks. For example: How old is a wooly mammoth fossil that that had 100.0 grams of C‐14 when alive and it’s fossil has 12.5 grams lej when you find it? Nuclear Reac9ons and Transmuta9on A nuclear reac9on is said to be different from radioac9vity because the transmuta9on occurs when a nucleus is bombarded by another par9cle or photon of energy. In the 1930’s, Enrico Fermi and his colleagues, bombarded atoms with neutrons and produced “transuranic” elements, elements heavier than uranium. Nuclear Fission 1 0 € 235 92 141 56 93 36 1 0 n+ U→ Ba+ Kr +3 n In 1938 OWo Hahn and Lise Meitner discovered that when uranium absorbed slow neutrons it could be split apart. They named this Nuclear Fission. During this nuclear reac9on energy was produced and this was the basis for the atomic bomb (uncontrolled chain reac9on) and nuclear power plants(controlled reac9on). In order to keep a chain reac9on going you need a certain amount of uranium to allow a chain reac9on. This is called the cri9cal mass. Nuclear Fusion 1 1 4 2 − 4 H→ He + 2e + 2ν + 2γ The process of building up nuclei by bringing together protons and neutrons together into larger nuclei is called Fusion. This is the process happening in stars and in the process mass is converted into energy according to E=mc2. € 1 0 10 5 7 3 4 2 n+ B→ Li+ He The above equation is an example of I. Nuclear Bombardment II. Nuclear Fission III. Nuclear Fusion IV. Alpha Decay A) I only B) II only C) I &III D) I&IV Measurement of Radia9on Dosimetry ΔN .693 = λN = N Δt T1/ 2 The strength of a source can be specified at a given 9me by sta9ng the source ac9vity, or the disintegra9ons per second. € 1 Curie(Ci) = 3.70 X 1010 dis/sec 1 becquerel(Bq) = 1 dis/sec Another measurement is the amount of radia9on absorbed. 1 Rad = 1.00 X 10‐2 J/Kg 1 Gray(Gy) = 100 Rad
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz