Hobart Model HBA2G Gas Double-Rack Oven
Performance Test
FSTC Report # 5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
August 2006
Prepared by:
David Zabrowski
Greg Sorensen
Fisher-Nickel, Inc.
Prepared for:
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Customer Energy Efficiency Programs
PO Box 770000
San Francisco, California 94177
© 2006 by Fisher-Nickel, inc. All rights reserved.
The information in this report is based on data generated at the Food Service Technology Center.
Acknowledgments
California consumers are not obligated to purchase any full service
or other service not funded by this program. This program is funded
by California utility ratepayers under the auspices of the California
Public Utilities Commission.
Los consumidores en California no estan obligados a comprar servicios completos o
adicionales que no esten cubiertos bajo este programa. Este programa esta financiado
por los usuarios de servicios públicos en California bajo la jurisdiccion de la Comision
Policy on the Use of Food Service Technology Center
Test Results and Other Related Information
•
•
•
de Servicios Públicos de California.
A Technical Advisory Group provides guidance to the Food Service
Technology Center Project. Members include:
•
Applebee’s International Group
•
California Energy Commission (CEC)
Denny’s Corporation
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.
EPA Energy Star
Gas Technology Institute (GTI)
Fisher-Nickel, inc. and the Food Service Technology Center
(FSTC) do not endorse particular products or services from any
specific manufacturer or service provider.
The FSTC is strongly committed to testing food service equipment
using the best available scientific techniques and instrumentation.
The FSTC is neutral as to fuel and energy source. It does not, in
any way, encourage or promote the use of any fuel or energy
source nor does it endorse any of the equipment tested at the
FSTC.
FSTC test results are made available to the general public
through technical research reports and publications and are protected under U.S. and international copyright laws.
In the event that FSTC data are to be reported, quoted, or referred
to in any way in publications, papers, brochures, advertising, or
any other publicly available documents, the rules of copyright
must be strictly followed, including written permission from FisherNickel, inc. in advance and proper attribution to Fisher-Nickel, inc.
and the Food Service Technology Center. In any such publication,
sufficient text must be excerpted or quoted so as to give full and
fair representation of findings as reported in the original documentation from FSTC.
In-N-Out Burger
National Restaurant Association
Safeway, Inc.
Southern California Edison
Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
University of California at Berkeley
University of California at Riverside
US Department of Energy, FEMP
Specific appreciation is extended to Hobart, for supplying the Food
Service Technology Center with a model HBA2G gas roll-in rotating
double-rack oven for controlled testing in the appliance laboratory.
Legal Notice
This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored by the California
Public Utilities Commission (Commission). It does not necessarily represent
the views of the Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The
Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability
for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of
this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has
not been approved or disapproved by the Commission nor has the Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report.
Disclaimer
Neither Fisher-Nickel, inc. nor the Food Service Technology Center nor any
of its employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any
legal liability of responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness
of any data, information, method, product or process discloses in this document, or represents that its use will not infringe any privately-owned rights,
including but not limited to, patents, trademarks, or copyrights.
Reference to specific products or manufacturers is not an endorsement of
that product or manufacturer by Fisher-Nickel, inc., the Food Service Technology Center or Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E).
Retention of this consulting firm by PG&E to develop this report does not
constitute endorsement by PG&E for any work performed other than that
specified in the scope of this project.
Contents
Page
Executive Summary ............................................................................... iii
1
Introduction...................................................................................... 1-1
Background ................................................................................. 1-1
Objectives.................................................................................... 1-2
Appliance Description.................................................................. 1-2
2
Methods ............................................................................................ 2-1
Setup and Instrumentation .......................................................... 2-1
Energy Input Rate and Thermostat Calibration ........................... 2-1
Preheat and Idle Tests ................................................................ 2-2
Steam Performance Test............................................................. 2-3
Baking-Energy Efficiency Tests................................................... 2-3
Browning Uniformity Tests........................................................... 2-5
Operating Cost Model.................................................................. 2-5
3
Results ............................................................................................. 3-1
Energy Input Rate and Thermostat Calibration ........................... 3-1
Preheat and Idle Rate Tests........................................................ 3-1
Steam Performance Test............................................................. 3-3
Baking Tests................................................................................ 3-4
Energy Cost Model...................................................................... 3-7
4
Conclusions ..................................................................................... 4-1
5
References........................................................................................ 5-1
Appendix A: Glossary
Appendix B: Appliance Specifications
Appendix C: Results Reporting Sheets
Appendix D: Baking-Energy Efficiency Data
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
i
List of Figures and Tables
Page
Figures
1-1
The Hobart HBA2G ..................................................................... 1-3
2-1
The Hobart HBA2G instrumented for testing ............................... 2-2
2-2
Cross section of a frozen apple pie ............................................. 2-3
2-3
Thermocouple rig for measuring baked pie temperature ............. 2-4
3-1
HBA2G Preheat characteristics................................................... 3-2
3-2
HBA2G Steam production & repeatability.................................... 3-3
3-3
Cakes in top rack position ........................................................... 3-6
3-4
Cakes in 4th rack position from top .............................................. 3-6
3-5
Cakes in 11th rack position from top ............................................ 3-7
Page
Tables
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
1-1
Appliance Specifications.............................................................. 1-3
3-1
Input, Preheat and Idle Test Results ........................................... 3-2
3-2
Steam Performance Test Results................................................ 3-3
3-3
Frozen Apple Pie Test Results .................................................... 3-5
3-4
Annual Cost Model ...................................................................... 3-8
ii
Executive Summary
Roll-in rack ovens offer high volume production and even baking in a relatively compact footprint. A single rack oven typically accommodates 15 pans
of product at a time, effectively replacing three full-size convection ovens; a
double rack oven can bake 30 pans of product at a time. These large capacity
ovens fill the requirements of high-volume retail and baking operations.
The Hobart HBA2G double-rack oven features stainless steel interior and exterior construction, a 300,000 Btu/h in-shot burner system with a weldless
tubular stainless steel heat exchanger, a self-contained steam generator and a
digital control panel with the capability to store 99 separate menus.
The Food Service Technology Center (FSTC) tested the Hobart, Model
HBA2G, gas-fired double-rack oven under controlled laboratory conditions.
Rack oven performance is characterized by preheat duration and energy consumption, idle energy rate, steam performance, baking energy rate and efficiency, production capacity, and browning uniformity. The oven was tested
using two different food products—frozen apple pies and white sheet cakes.
Oven steam performance is defined as the oven’s ability to consistently provide sufficient steam for baking crusty breads. The steam performance of the
Hobart HBA2G double rack oven was monitored over five successive steam
cycles conducted at 15-minute intervals. The results of the steam performance
are summarized in Figure ES-1.
Baking-energy efficiency is a measure of how much of the energy that an appliance consumes is actually delivered to the frozen pies during the baking
process. Baking-energy efficiency is therefore defined by the following relationship:
Baking-Energy Efficiency % =
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
E pies+ E pans
E oven
× 100%
iii
Executive Summary
A summary of the preheat, idle and baking test results is presented in Table
ES-1.
0.80
Steam Produced (gal) .
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Figure ES-1.
Hobart HBA2G steam
performance.
0.00
1
2
3
4
5
Cycle Number
Table ES-1. Summary of the Hobart HBA2G Rack Oven Performance.
Rated Energy Input Rate (Btu/h)
300,000
Measured Energy Input Rate (Btu/h)
297,645
Preheat to 400°F:
Preheat Time (min)
Preheat Energy (Btu)
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
22.3
71,387
Idle Energy Rate @ 400°F (Btu/h)
32,320
Idle Fan/Control Energy Rate (kW)
1.07
Baking-Energy Efficiency (%)
55.7 ± 1.0
Production Capacity (lb/h)
287.6 ± 4.6
iv
Executive Summary
Hobart’s HBA2G double rack oven performed well during controlled laboratory testing, exhibiting a competitive 55% baking-energy efficiency and a 288
lb/h production capacity. The oven’s consistent and repeatable steam generation stands up to high-volume baking while delivering enough steam to ensure
a quality baked product.
With the results obtained from the application of the laboratory test, the annual expenditures associated with its operation can be estimated. For this
model, the rack oven was used to bake 1,200 pounds of food over a 12-hour
day, with one preheat per day, 365 days a year. At $1.20/therm and
$0.10/kWh, the Hobart HBA2G double rack oven would have an annual operating cost of $4,044 under this scenario.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
v
1 Introduction
Background
Dedicated to the advancement of the food service industry, the Food Service
Technology Center (FSTC) has focused on the development of standard test
methods for commercial food service equipment since 1987. The test methods, approved and ratified by the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM), allow benchmarking of equipment such that users can make meaningful comparisons among available equipment choices.
The primary component of the FSTC is a 10,000 square-foot appliance laboratory equipped with energy monitoring and data acquisition hardware, 60 linear feet of canopy exhaust hoods integrated with utility distribution systems,
appliance setup and storage areas, and a state-of-the-art demonstration and
training facility. End-use customers and commercial appliance manufacturers
consider the FSTC to be the national leader in commercial food service
equipment testing and standards, sparking alliances with several major chain
customers to date.
Roll-in rack ovens offer high volume production and even baking in a relatively compact footprint. A single rack oven typically accommodates 15 pans
of product at a time, effectively replacing three full-size convection ovens; a
double rack oven can bake 30 pans of product at a time. These large capacity
ovens fill the requirements of high-volume retail and baking operations. They
are also ideal for rethermalizing many products prepared in cook/chill systems
as well as baking and roasting. The rack oven is capable of producing thousands of identical products or many diverse menu items within the same cooking cavity.
The glossary in Appendix A is provided so that the reader has a quick reference to the terms used in this report.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
1-1
Introduction
Objectives
The objective of this report is to examine the operation and performance of
the Hobart, Model HBA2G, gas double-rack oven under the controlled laboratory test conditions. The scope of this testing is as follows:
1. Verify that the rack oven is operating at the manufacturer’s rated
energy input.
2. Determine the time and energy required to preheat the rack oven
from room temperature to 400°F.
3. Determine the idle energy rate with the rack oven set to maintain
400°F in the baking chamber.
4. Characterize the rack oven’s ability to produce steam during
successive baking cycles.
5. Document the rack oven’s browning uniformity using white
sheet cakes.
6. Document the baking-energy consumption and baking-energy
efficiency using frozen apple pies as the test product.
7. Determine the baking time and production capacity.
8. Estimate the annual operating cost for the rack oven using a
standard cost model.
Appliance
Description
The Hobart HBA2G double-rack oven features stainless steel interior and exterior construction, a 300,000 Btu/h in-shot burner system with a weldless
tubular stainless steel heat exchanger, a self-contained steam generator and a
digital control panel. A single-point connection provides venting for the integrated eyebrow hood, burner system and oven cavity. The integrated hood is
fully welded and can be connected as either a Type I (heat and vapor) installation, or a Type II (grease) installation. The programmable controls have the
capability to store 99 separate menus with up to four separate stages.
Appliance specifications are listed in Table 1-1, and the manufacturer’s literature is in Appendix B. The appliance is pictured in Figure 1-1.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
1-2
Introduction
Figure 1-1.
The Hobart HBA2G.
Table 1-1. Appliance Specifications.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
Manufacturer
Hobart
Model
HBA2G
Generic Appliance Type
Double-rack gas oven
Rated Input
300,000 Btu/h
Construction
Stainless steel exterior and interior
Controls
Solid-state programmable controls with a 99 different recipes
Pan Capacity (as tested)
30 full-size (18" x 26") sheet pans
External Dimensions
(including hood)
72.0" x 92.5" x 99.5" (w×d×h)
1-3
2 Methods
In May 2005, the ASTM F26 Committee on food service equipment formed a
task group to re-examine the procedures within the ASTM F2093-01 Standard
Test Method for the Performance of Rack Ovens1. The task group was
charged with simplifying the testing while improving the relevance of the resulting performance data. The procedures documented in this report and used
for testing the Hobart HBA2G rack oven represent the task group’s recommendations to the F26 Committee for a revised version of the ASTM test
method.
Setup and
Instrumentation
The double-rack oven was installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions in a conditioned test space. The room was maintained at an ambient condition of 75 ± 5°F during testing. Natural gas consumption was measured with a positive displacement-type gas meter that generated a pulse for
every 0.1 ft³ consumed. Motor and control energy were measured with a
watt/watt-hour transducer that generated a pulse for each 10 Wh used. Water
consumption was measured with an in-line flow sensor installed on the water
inlet hose. Oven cavity temperature was monitored with 24 gauge, type K,
Teflon insulated thermocouple wire located at the center of the pressure panel
outlet. The transducer and thermocouples were connected to a computerized
data acquisition unit that recorded data every 5 seconds. Figure 2-1 shows the
Hobart double-rack oven instrumented with the data acquisition system.
Energy Input Rate
and Thermostat
Calibration
The energy input rate was determined by turning the oven on and measuring
the energy consumed from the time the oven first began operating until the
time when the elements or steam generator first cycled off. The energy consumed and the time elapsed were used to calculate the maximum energy input
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
2-1
Methods
rate. Thermostat calibration was verified by allowing the oven to operate with
the thermostat set to the specified operating temperature of 400°F for a period
of one hour and then monitoring the oven cavity temperature for a period of
thirty minutes. If the average oven temperature during the thirty minutes was
more than 405°F or less than 395°F, the controls were adjusted, the oven was
allowed to re-stabilize at the new temperature for a period of one hour, and the
cavity temperature was again monitored for a period of thirty minutes. This
process was repeated until the oven temperature was within 400 ± 5°F.
Figure 2-1.
The Hobart HBA2G oven
instrumented for testing.
Preheat and Idle
Tests
The preheat test recorded the time and energy required for the oven to increase the cavity temperature from 75 ± 5°F to a temperature of 390°F. Recording began when the oven was first turned on, so any time delay before the
ignition of the burner was included in the test. Although the specified operat-
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
2-2
Methods
ing temperature is 400°F, research at the Food Service Technology Center has
indicated that a rack oven is sufficiently preheated and ready to cook when the
oven temperature is within 10°F of the oven set point.
After the oven was preheated, it was allowed to stabilize for two hours, and
then idle energy was monitored for a 3-hour period.
Steam Performance
Test
The steam performance test consisted of five successive baking cycles at 15minute intervals. The rack oven was stabilized at 400°F for a minimum of two
hours and the steam injection time set to manufacturer specifications for
crusty bread. Water consumption and runoff were measured and recorded for
each cycle. The amount of steam produced for each cycle was determined as
the difference between the water into the oven and the runoff collected from
the oven drain.
Baking-Energy
Efficiency Tests
The baking-energy efficiency and production capacity tests consisted of baking frozen apple pies on full-size sheet pans. The 10-inch ready-to-bake apple
pies weighed an average of 3.10 ± 0.15 lb and consisted of a pre-cooked apple
based filling (see Figure 2-2).
Figure 2-2. Cross section
of a frozen apple pie.
Three pies were placed on each baking pan and baked from 0 ± 5°F to an average temperature of 185 ± 5°F. Baked pie temperature was measured using a
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
2-3
Methods
rig that held three thermocouples in a straight line across the diameter of the
pie and fixed so that the sensing point could be easily located in the middle of
the filling (Figure 2-3).
Figure 2-3.
Thermocouple rig for
measuring baked pie
temperature.
Energy imparted to the frozen pies is the sum of the energy required to raise
their temperatures from 0°F to the endpoint (sensible energy), the energy required to melt the frozen water in the pies (fusion energy), and the energy required to vaporize a portion of the water contained in the pies (vaporization
energy). The rack oven’s baking-energy efficiency is the amount of energy
imparted to the pies, expressed as a percentage of the amount of energy consumed by the rack oven during the baking process.
The pie test was applied in triplicate and a statistical analysis of the results
was performed to ensure that the reported baking-energy efficiency and production capacity results had an uncertainty of less than 10%.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
2-4
Methods
Browning
Uniformity Tests
The rack oven’s browning uniformity was documented while baking white
sheet cakes. For this test, the oven was loaded with 30 full-size sheet pans,
each filled with 5 pounds of cake batter. The cakes were considered done
when a wood skewer could be inserted into the cakes and removed without
any particles adhering to it.
Appendix C contains the ASTM results reporting sheets for this oven.
Operating Cost
Model
The oven operating cost was calculated based on a combination of test data
and assumptions about typical oven usage. This provides a standard method
for estimating oven energy consumption based on ASTM performance test
results. The examples contained in the operating cost model are for informational purposes only, and should not be considered an absolute.
The model assumes that the rack oven was used to bake 1,200 pounds of food
over a 12-hour day, with one preheat per day, 365 days a year. The idle
(standby) time for the oven was determined by taking the difference between
the total daily “on” time (12 hours) and the time spent baking and preheating.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
2-5
3 Results
Energy Input Rate
and Thermostat
Calibration
The energy input rate was measured and compared with the manufacturer’s
nameplate value to ensure the rack oven was operating within its specified
parameters. The measured energy input rate was 297,645 Btu/h, which was
0.8% lower than the nameplate rate of 300,000 Btu/h, but well within the 5%
tolerance of the ASTM test method.
With the thermostat set to an indicated 400°F, the oven temperature at the
pressure panel averaged 395°F. Therefore, testing was conducted with the
thermostat at an indicated 405°F for all tests, with the exception of the sheet
cake test, which was conducted at an indicated temperature of 330°F.
Preheat and
Idle Rate Tests
Preheat Energy and Time
The rack oven was instrumented with thermocouples located at the vertical
center of each pressure panel in the air outlet to record the oven cavity temperature. After stabilizing the oven cavity at room temperature (75 ± 5°F)
overnight, the oven was turned on and preheated to 400°F. Elapsed time and
energy consumption were recorded during this preheat period. Any time that
elapsed before the ignition of the burners was included in the test time. The
oven reached 390°F in 22.3 minutes, while consuming 71,387 Btu. Figure 3-1
shows the rack oven’s energy consumption along with the baking cavity temperature during this preheat test.
Idle Energy Rate
The idle energy rate represents the energy required to maintain the set temperature, or the rack oven’s stand-by losses. After the rack oven had stabilized
at 400°F for at least two hours, researchers monitored oven energy for an ad-
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-1
Results
ditional three hours. The idle energy rate during this period was 32,320 Btu/h.
Figure 3-1.
HBA2G preheat
characteristics.
450
450
400
400
350
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0
Gas Energy Rate (kBtu/h)
Temperature (°F)
Table 3-1 summarizes the results of the input rate, preheat and idle tests.
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
Time (min)
Table 3-1. Input and Preheat and Idle Test Results.
Rated Energy Input Rate (Btu/h)
300,000
Measured Energy Input Rate (Btu/h)
297,645
Preheat to Operational Capacity:
Time (min)
Gas Energy Consumption (Btu)
Electric Energy Consumption (Wh)
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
22.3
71,387
526
Idle Energy Rate @ 400°F (Btu/h)
32,320
Idle Fan/Control Energy Rate (kW)
1.07
3-2
Results
Steam Performance
Test
The rack oven’s ability to produce steam repeatedly was determined by running five successive steam cycles at 15-minute intervals. The interval was
chosen as representative of a high-volume bakery baking 4-loads of bread per
hour. Since many bakers consider ample steam at the start of the bake an essential requirement for a hard, shiny crust, the ability of the oven to produce
sufficient steam from one bake cycle to the next is an important parameter to
an operator. Table 3-2 and Figure 3-2 summarize the results of the steam performance tests.
Table 3-2. Steam Performance Test Results.
Cycle number
1
2
3
4
5
Water injection time (sec)
10
10
10
10
10
Volume of water delivered (gal)
0.57
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.56
Volume of Runoff (gal)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Volume of steam delivered (gal)
0.57
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.56
0.80
Steam Produced (gal) .
0.70
Figure 3-2.
HBA-2G Steam production & repeatability.
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
2
3
4
5
Cycle Number
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-3
Results
Baking Tests
Two different food products were baked in the Hobart rack oven: frozen apple
pies and sheet cakes. The frozen pies represented a heavy load on the oven
due to large thermal mass, while the sheet cakes represented a medium load
on the oven and provided distinct browning characteristics. Thirty full-size
sheet pans were used for both sets of baking tests. Bake time, oven temperature and oven energy consumption were monitored during these tests.
Pie Tests
The rack oven was tested with a full load (30 pans) of frozen apple pies. The
pie test was designed to reflect a rack oven’s maximum performance. The
large frozen load would drive down the cavity temperature and challenge the
oven to recover after loading the pies. The Hobart double rack oven baked a
full-load of pies in 55.0 minutes, while consuming 106,730 Btu.
Baking-energy efficiency is defined as the quantity of energy consumed by
the food and pans expressed as a percentage of energy consumed by the oven
during the cooking test:
Baking-Energy Efficiency % =
E pies + E pans
E oven
× 100%
Energy imparted into the pies was calculated by separating the various components of the apple pies (water, fat, solids) and determining the amount of
heat absorbed by each component during the baking process. Baking-energy
efficiency results for the frozen pie tests were 55.3%, 56.1% and 55.6%,
yielding an uncertainty of 1.7% in the test results. Table 3-2 summarizes the
results of the frozen pie tests. Appendix D contains a synopsis of test data for
each replicate of the cooking tests.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-4
Results
Table 3-3. Frozen Apple Pie Test Results.
Pies per Load
Bake Time (min)
Baking Energy Rate (Btu/h)
Fan/Control Energy Rate (kW)
90
55.0
118,760
1.28
Oven Energy Consumption (Btu/lb)
Production Capacity (lb/h)
287.6 ± 4.6
Baking-Energy Efficiency (%)
55.7 ± 1.0
Sheet Cake Test
White sheet cakes provide a visual indication of the temperature uniformity of
an oven while baking. The bake time was experimentally determined so that
the cakes were uniformly cooked while exhibiting the greatest possible differences in color. In any oven, one can expect variations in color and texture
from rack to rack, especially in the top location, since this area of the oven is
usually the hottest. The final cook time that produced the most uniform batch
of sheet cakes was determined to be 20.0 minutes. The results of the test are
described below and visual representations of the browning are shown in Figures 3-3 through 3-5.
Overall sheet cake browning was consistent from cake to cake. The first and
third rack positions were slightly darker than the others. Uniformity across
individual cakes was good, with minimal variation in color from center to
corners. The photographs in Figures 3-3 through 3-5 show the cakes from the
topmost position and two other rack positions that are indicative of the remainder of the set.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-5
Results
Figure 3-3
Cakes in top rack
position.
Figure 3-4.
Cakes in 4th rack position from top.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-6
Results
Figure 3-5.
Cakes in 11th rack position from top.
Energy Cost Model
With the results obtained from the application of the laboratory test, the annual expenditures associated with its operation can be estimated. This guide
can be used to project the operating cost of this rack oven based on the hours
of operation, the amount of food produced, etc. Consumers can use this tool,
along with the performance results to compare this appliance with other models and manufacturers.
For this model, the rack oven was used to bake 1,200 pounds of food over a
12-hour day, with one preheat per day, 365 days a year. The idle (standby)
time for the oven was determined by taking the difference between the total
daily “on” time (12 hours) and the time spent baking and preheating. This approach produces a more accurate estimate of the operating costs for the rack
oven. Table 3-6 summarizes the energy consumption and associated operating
cost for the Hobart HBA2G double rack oven under this scenario.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
3-7
Results
Table 3-4. Annual Cost Model.
Gas (kBtu) a
Electricity (kWh)
Daily Preheat Energy
71.4
0.53
Daily Idle Energy
241.1
7.98
Daily Cooking Energy
495.2
5.34
807.7
13.85
Total Daily Energy
Total Operating Cost ($/yr)
a
b
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
b
$4,044
1 kBtu = 1,000 Btu
Oven energy costs are based on $1.20/therm for gas and $0.10/kWh for electricity. (1 therm =100,000 Btu).
3-8
4 Conclusions
Hobart’s HBA2G double rack oven performed well during controlled laboratory testing, exhibiting a competitive 55% baking-energy efficiency and a 288
lb/h production capacity. 2,3 The oven’s consistent and repeatable steam generation stands up to high-volume baking while delivering enough steam to
ensure a quality baked product.
The 2001 version of the ASTM test method for rack ovens specifies additional
medium (15 pans) and light (2 pans) load tests. 1 After discussions with manufacturers and end users, it was decided to eliminate these part-load tests since
they were considered not representative of a typical real-world operation.
Eliminating the unnecessary light and medium-load tests significantly shortened the overall testing, while providing data that could be used to model
oven energy consumption and cost.
Preheat and idle were simplified by reducing the stabilization time from 4
hours per the 2001 version of the ASTM test method to 2 hours. The Hobart
oven was ready to bake in less than 20 minutes, consuming 71,387 Btu of
natural gas and 0.53 kWh of fan energy. During idle at 400°F, the oven consumed 32,320 Btu/h and 1,100 watts for the fan.
With the results obtained from the application of the laboratory test, the annual expenditures associated with its operation can be estimated. For this
model, the rack oven was used to bake 1,200 pounds of food over a 12-hour
day, with one preheat per day, 365 days a year. At $1.20/therm and
$0.10/kWh, the Hobart HBA2G double rack oven would have an annual operating cost of $4,044 under this scenario.
Based on the results of testing the Hobart HBA2G double-rack oven, it is recommended that the simplified test procedure used for testing the Hobart
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
4-1
Conclusions
HBA2G double rack oven replace the existing cumbersome procedure in the
ASTM standard test method.
5011.06.ro
Food Service Technology Center
4-2
5 References
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
1.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 2001. Standard Test
Method for the Performance of Rack Ovens. ASTM Designation F2093–
01. In annual book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA.
2.
Zabrowski, D., Sorensen, G., 2006. Lang BakerSeries® Gas DoubleRack Oven Performance Test. Food Service Technology Center Report
5011.06.04, March.
3.
Zabrowski, D., Sorensen, G., 2006. Revent, Model 724U Gas DoubleRack Oven Performance Test. Food Service Technology Center Report
5011.06.07 draft, June.
5-1
A Glossary
Baking Energy (kWh or kBtu)
The total energy consumed by an appliance as it is used
to bake a specified food product.
Baking Energy Consumption Rate
(kW or kBtu/h)
The average rate of energy consumption during the baking period.
Baking-Energy Efficiency (%)
The quantity of energy input to the food product; expressed as a percentage of the quantity of energy input to
the appliance during the baking tests.
Duty Cycle (%)
Load Factor
The average energy consumption rate (based on a specified operating period for the appliance) expressed as a
percentage of the measured energy input rate.
Duty Cycle =
Average Energy Consumption Rate
x 100
Measured Energy Input Rate
Idle Energy Rate (kW or Btu/h)
Idle Energy Input Rate
Idle Rate
The rate of appliance energy consumption while it is
“holding” or maintaining a stabilized operating condition
or temperature.
Idle Temperature (°F, Setting)
The temperature of the cooking cavity/surface (selected
by the appliance operator or specified for a controlled
test) that is maintained by the appliance under an idle
condition.
Idle Duty Cycle (%)
Idle Energy Factor
The idle energy consumption rate expressed as a percentage of the measured energy input rate.
Idle Duty Cycle =
Idle Energy Consumption Rate
x 100
Measured Energy Input Rate
Measured Input Rate (kW or Btu/h)
Measured Energy Input Rate
Measured Peak Energy Input Rate
Energy Input Rate (kW or kBtu/h)
Energy Consumption Rate
Energy Rate
The maximum or peak rate at which an appliance consumes energy, typically reflected during appliance preheat (i.e., the period of operation when all burners or
elements are “on”).
The peak rate at which an appliance will consume energy, typically reflected during preheat.
Preheat Energy (kWh or Btu)
Preheat Energy Consumption
Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
Heating Content
The total amount of energy consumed by an appliance
during the preheat period.
The quantity of heat (energy) generated by the combustion of fuel. For natural gas, this quantity varies depending on the constituents of the gas.
Preheat Rate (°F/min)
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
The rate at which the oven cavity heats during a preheat.
A-1
Glossary
Preheat Time (minute)
Preheat Period
The time required for an appliance to heat from the ambient room temperature (75 ± 5°F) to a specified (and
calibrated) operating temperature or thermostat set point.
Production Capacity (lb/h)
The maximum production rate of an appliance while
cooking a specified food product in accordance with the
heavy-load cooking test.
Rated Energy Input Rate
(kW, W or Btu/h, Btu/h)
Input Rating (ANSI definition)
Nameplate Energy Input Rate
Rated Input
The maximum or peak rate at which an appliance consumes energy as rated by the manufacturer and specified
on the nameplate.
Test Method
A definitive procedure for the identification, measurement, and evaluation of one or more qualities, characteristics, or properties of a material, product, system, or
service that produces a test result.
Typical Day
A sampled day of average appliance usage based on
observations and/or operator interviews, used to develop
an energy cost model for the appliance.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
A-2
B Appliance Specifications
Appendix B includes the product literature for the Hobart HBA2G gas-fired
double-rack oven.
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
B-1
Item # _____________________________________
Quantity ___________________________________
C.S.I. Section 11400
701 S Ridge Avenue, Troy, OH 45374
1-888-4HOBART • www.hobartcorp.com
HBA2G DOUBLE RACK
OVEN – GAS
STANDARD FEATURES
MODEL
■ Advanced digital programmable control panel
includes:
- Bake/steam timers
- Cool-down mode
- Vent mode
- Four stage baking
- Auto on/off control
- Auto vent
- 99 menus
- Energy saving sleep mode
❑ HBA2G – Double Rack Oven, Gas
■ 300,000 BTU in-shot burner system
■ High-temp stainless steel tubular heat
exchanger with weldless construction for
longer life
■ Heavy duty rack lift includes high-temp bearings
and slip clutch soft start rotation system
■ Stainless steel interior and exterior construction
■ Shipped in two main sections for ease of
installation
■ Field reversible bake chamber door
❑ Back-up control
❑ Propane gas
❑ Floor extender kit
❑ Shipped assembled (less canopy/steam
system)
❑ Aluminum or stainless steel oven racks
❑ High output 350,000 BTU burner system
❑ Dual vent to provide for separate vent
connection for hood and combustion flue
❑ Hood with grease filters (complies with NFPA 96
for Type I installations)
❑ Narrow viewing glass (10" W x 57.5" H)
❑ “C” style rack lift
❑ Kosher package
❑ 50 Hz available, consult factory for details
Specifications, Details and Dimensions on Back.
■ Fully welded hood for Type II installation
■ Space saving 72" wide x 62" deep footprint
(less canopy)
■ Wide viewing glass (21" W x 57.5" H) with triple
pane glass for reduced heat loss and cooler
working area in front of oven
■ Self-contained cast spherical steam system
■ Pre-plumbed gas and water lines
■ Built-in rollers and levelers for ease of
installation
■ Single point 8" vent connection
■ Stainless steel “B” style rack lift
■ Capacity - two single racks or one double rack
■ One year parts/labor warranty
F-40014 – HBA2G Double Rack Oven – Gas
Page 1 of 2
HBA2G DOUBLE RACK OVEN – GAS
■ Flush floor with patented adjustable floor
construction provides easy access - no ramp
required
OPTIONS
HBA2G DOUBLE RACK
OVEN – GAS
701 S Ridge Avenue, Troy, OH 45374
1-888-4HOBART • www.hobartcorp.com
SPECIFICATIONS
NOTES
1. Water—1⁄2" NPT. Cold water @ 30 psi. (207 kPa) minimum @ 4.5
GPM (.29 liters/sec) flow rate.
2. Drain—Choose either rear or front drain and plug the drain
connection that is not in use. Route to air-gap drain.
Rear drain: 3⁄4" FNPT; resides 5.5" from floor; Kit is provided to
extend drain to left or right side of oven.
Front drain: 3⁄8" FNPT; resides 2" from floor.
3. Gas—11⁄4" NPT. Connect Point
Gas
Input Rate
Natural Gas
Standard
Propane Gas
Natural Gas
Optional
Propane Gas
300,000 BTU/hr.
(88 kJ/s)
300,000 BTU/hr.
(88 kJ/s)
350,000 BTU/hr.
(102 kJ/s)
350,000 BTU/hr.
(102 kJ/s)
1. The purchaser is responsible for all installation costs and for
providing: Disposal of packing materials; labor to unload oven upon
arrival; installation mechanics; and all local service connections
including electricity, vents, gas, water and drain per local code.
A factory technician or factory authorized installation technician
must supervise and approve any installation. In order to validate
the warranty, the start-up must be performed by an Authorized
Servicer.
2. All services must comply with federal, state and local codes.
3. CAUTION – To reduce the risk of fire, the appliance is to be
mounted on floors of non-combustible construction with noncombustible flooring and surface finish and with no combustible
material against the underside thereof, or on non-combustible slabs
or arches having no combustible material against the underside.
IMPORTANT: Do not route utilities (wiring, plumbing, etc.) in or
under the non-combustible floor beneath the oven.
4. For proper installation, floor should be level within 1⁄8" per foot not
to exceed 3⁄4". Floor anchors require minimum of 1" thick solid floor
substrate.
5. Minimum clearances to combustible construction: 0 inches from
sides and back; 18" from top (99.5"). 10 feet minimum ceiling
height for service access and filt up for installation.
6. Ventilator fan is required. Consult local authorities to determine
whether TYPE 1 (grease) or TYPE 2 (vapor) duct will be required.
Hood connection suitable for connection to Type B vent, except
when products of baking are grease laden.
7. Actual weight: 3,520 lbs.;
Shipping weight: 4,150 lbs. (freight class 70)
Supply Pressure
(flowing)
5-14" w.c.
(1.25-3.5 kPa)
10-14" w.c.
(2.5-3.5 kPa)
6-14" w.c.
(1.5-3.5 kPa)
12-14" w.c.
(3.0-3.5 kPa)
4. Electrical—2 supplies required.
1) 120/60/1. 20 amp dedicated circuit.
2) 208-230/60/3
4.4-4.2 amps
220/60/1
6.8 amps
460/60/3
2.1 amps
5. Hood Vent—8" diameter connection collar. Minimum 750 cfm
(21.3 m3/min) required with 0.6" w.c. (150 Pa) static pressure drop
through hood. Hood is fully welded. Customer to supply duct and
ventilator fan per local code. Air proving switch factory installed
and integrated with burner system operation. Oven provided relay
with max. 6.0 amp 1⁄3 H.P. @ 120V output for fan operation.
SECTION
Heating
Bake
Hood
Door
W x D x H (CRATED)
70" x 107" x 48"
70" x 107" x 48"
22" x 97" x 41"
11" x 78" x 50"
PALLET WGT./CU. FT.
2046 lb. / 203.7
1488 lb. / 203.7
345 lb. / 46.0
265 lb. / 23.5
W x D x H (ACTUAL)
36" x 62" x 104"
36" x 62" x 104"
18" x 72" x 31"
44.5" x 5" x 74"
DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS
Highest Point on Oven—104.0" (264.2 cm)
Front View
Side View
1
Water
2
Drain
3
Gas
4
Electrical
5
Hood Vent
Top View
As continued product improvement is a policy of Hobart, specifications are subject to change without notice.
Page 2 of 2
F-40014 (REV. 3/06)
F-40014 – HBA2G Double Rack Oven – Gas
LITHO IN U.S.A. (H-01)
Printed On Recycled Paper
C Results Reporting Sheets
Manufacturer:
Model:
Date:
Hobart
HBA2G
January 2006
Test Rack Oven
Description of operational characteristics:
The Hobart HBA2G double-rack oven features stainless steel interior and exterior construction, a 300,000 Btu/h
in-shot burner system with a weldless tubular stainless steel heat exchanger, an integrated eyebrow hood with a singlepoint exhaust connection, a heavy-duty rack lift mechanism, and a programmable digital control panel. The programable controls have the capability to store 99 separate menus with up to four stages.
Description of steam generator:
Steam is produced using a self-contained cast spherical steam system. Cold water is sprayed onto the hot iron mass
and immediately flashed into steam.
Apparatus
√
Check if testing apparatus conformed to specifications in Section 6.
Energy Input Rate
Gas Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
1019
Measured (Btu) 297,645
Rated (Btu) 300,000
Percent Difference between Measured and Rated (%)
0.8
Thermostat Calibration
As-Received:
Oven Temperature Control Setting (°F)
Oven Cavity Temperature (°F)
395
400
As-Adjusted:
Oven Temperature Control Setting (°F)
Oven Cavity Temperature (°F)
400
405
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
C-1
Results Reporting Sheets
Preheat Energy and Time
450
450
400
400
350
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0
Gas Energy Rate (kBtu/h)
Temperature (°F)
Gas Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
1013
Starting Temperature (°F) 71.0
Energy Consumption (Btu) 71,387
Electric Energy Consumption (Wh) 526
Duration (min) 22.3
Preheat Rate (°F/min) 14.3
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
Time (min)
Preheat Curve
Idle Energy Rate
Gas Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
1030
Idle Energy Rate (Btu/h) 32,320
Electric Energy Rate (kW) 1.07
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
C-2
Results Reporting Sheets
Browning Uniformity (White Sheet Cakes)
Description of sheet cake browning:
Overall sheet cake browning was consistent from cake to cake. The first and third rack positions were slightly darker
than the others. Uniformity across individual cakes was good, with minimal variation in color from center to corners.
Gas Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
1017
Initial Cake Temperature (°F)
68.6
Final Cake Temperature (°F) 196.4
Sheet Cake Bake Time (min) 20.0
Sheet Cake Baking Energy (Btu) 37,840
Electric Energy (Wh) 440
The following photographs show the cakes from the topmost position and two other rack positions that are indicative of
the remainder of the set.
Rack Position: 1st (Top)
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
C-3
Results Reporting Sheets
Rack Position: 4th from Top
Rack Position: 11th from Top
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
C-4
Results Reporting Sheets
Steam Performance:
Cycle #1
Cycle #2
Cycle #3
Cycle #4
Cycle #5
10
10
10
10
10
Volume of water delivered per cycle (gal)
0.57
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.56
Volume of Runoff per cycle (gal)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Volume of steam delivered each cycle
0.57
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.56
Water injection time (sec)
(gal)
Baking Energy Efficiency, Baking Energy Rate and Production Capacity
Gas Heating Value (Btu/ft3)
1025.3
Baking Time (min) 55.0
Production Capacity (lbs/h) 287.6 ± 4.6
Energy To Food (Btu/lb) 224
Baking Energy Rate (Btu/h) 118,760
Electric Energy Rate (kW) 1.28
Energy per Pound of Food Cooked (Btu/lb)
Baking Energy Efficiency (%) 55.7 ± 1.0
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
428
C-5
D Baking-Energy Efficiency Data
Table D-1. Specific Heat and Latent Heat.
Specific Heat (Btu/lb, °F)
Apple Pies
0.63
Aluminum (Sheet pans)
0.20
Latent Heat (Btu/lb)
Fusion, Water
144
Vaporization, Water
970
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
D-1
Baking-Energy Efficiency Data
Table D-1. Full-Load Pie Test Data
Replication 1
Replication 2
Replication 3
55.0
55.0
55.0
110,738
106,817
109,031
Fan/Control Energy Consumption (Wh)
1,176
1,178
1,153
Initial Temperature of Frozen Pies (°F)
0.3
3.4
-0.8
Final Temperature of Baked Pies (°F)
185.3
182.9
180.2
Weight of Sheet Pans (lb)
106.3
106.4
106.3
Initial Weight of Raw Frozen Pies (lb)
477.9
476.9
480.2
Final Weight of Baked Pies (lb)
469.2
468.2
471.8
Initial Moisture Content of the Apple Pies (%)
53.7
53.7
53.7
141.5
140.9
142.7
8.7
8.6
8.4
Sensible Heat (Btu)
30,695
29,645
30,276
Latent – Heat of Fusion (Btu)
20,379
20,285
20,545
Latent – Heat of Vaporization (Btu)
8,439
8,381
8,167
Total Energy to Food (Btu)
59,513
58,311
58,989
226
222
222
3,933
3,820
3,848
114,752
110,837
112,966
436
423
425
120,805
116,527
118,943
Fan/Control Energy Rate (kW)
1.28
1.29
1.26
Baking-Energy Efficiency (%)
55.3
56.1
55.6
Production Capacity (lb/h)
287.3
286
289.6
Measured Values
Bake Time (min)
Oven Energy Consumption (Btu)
Calculated Values
Initial Weight of Water (lb)
Weight Loss During Baking (lb)
Energy to Food (Btu/lb)
Energy to Pans (Btu)
Total Energy Consumed by the Rack Oven (Btu)
Energy to Oven (Btu/lb of food produced)
Results
Baking Energy Rate (Btu/h)
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
D-2
Baking-Energy Efficiency Data
Table D-2. Baking-Energy Efficiency and Production Capacity Statistics.
Baking-Energy Efficiency
Production Capacity
Replicate #1
55.3
287.3
Replicate #2
56.1
286.0
Replicate #3
55.6
289.6
Average
55.7
287.6
Standard Deviation
0.38
1.86
Absolute Uncertainty
0.95
4.60
Percent Uncertainty
1.7
1.60
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
D-3
E Energy Cost Model
Appliance test results are useful not only for benchmarking appliance performance, but also for estimating
appliance energy consumption. The following procedure is a guideline for estimating rack oven energy consumption based on data obtained from applying the appropriate test method.
The intent of this Appendix is to present a standard method for estimating oven energy consumption based
on ASTM performance test results. The examples contained herein are for information only and should not be
considered an absolute. To obtain an accurate estimate of energy consumption for a particular operation, parameters specific to that operation should be used (e.g., operating time, and amount of food cooked under
heavy-, medium-, and light-loads).
The appropriate oven performance parameters are obtained from section 11 in the test method.
The calculation will proceed as follows: First, determine the appliance operating time and total number of
preheats. Then estimate the quantity of food baked during the day. Calculate the energy due to baking, using
full-load equivalent baking hours and calculate the idle energy consumption. The total daily energy is the sum
of these components plus the preheat energy. For simplicity, it is assumed that subsequent preheats require the
same time and energy as the first preheat of the day.
Application of the test method to the Hobart HBA2G gas rack oven yielded the following results:
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
E-1
Energy Cost Model
Table E.1: Hobart HBA2G Gas Double-Rack Oven Test Results.
Preheat Time
Preheat Energy
Idle Energy Rate
Heavy-Load Baking Energy Rate
Heavy-Load Production Capacity
22.3 min
71,387 Btu + 0.53 kWh
32,320 Btu/h + 1.07 kW
118,760 Btu/h + 1.28 kW
288 lb/h
Step 1—The following appliance operation is assumed:
Table E.2: Oven Operation Assumptions.
Operating Time
Number of Preheats
Total Amount of Food Cooked
12 h
1 preheat
1,200 lb
Step 2—Calculate the total heavy-load baking energy.
The total time cooking heavy-loads is as follows:
th =
W
,
PC
lb
th = 1,200
288 lb/h ,
th = 4.17 h
The total heavy-load energy consumption is then calculated as follows:
Egas,h = qgas,h × th,
Eelec,h = qelec,h × th,
Egas,h = 118,760 Btu/h × 4.17 h,
Eelec,h = 1.28 kW × 4.17 h,
Egas,h = 495,229 Btu
Eelec,h = 5.34 kWh
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
E-2
Energy Cost Model
Step 3—Calculate the total idle time and energy consumption.
The total idle time is determined as follows:
ti = ton − th −
np × tp
,
60
ti = 12.0 h − 4.17 h −
1 preheat × 22.3 min
60 min/h
ti = 7.46 h
The idle energy consumption is then calculated as follows:
Egas,i = qgas,i × ti,
Eelec,i = qelec,i × ti,
Egas,i = 32,320 Btu/h × 7.46 h
Eelec,i = 1.07 kW × 7.46 h
Egas,i = 241,107 Btu
Eelec,i = 7.98 kWh
Step 4—The total daily energy consumption is calculated as follows:
Egas,daily = Egas,h + Egas,i + np × Egas,p,
Egas,daily = 495,229 Btu + 241,107 Btu +1 × 71,387 Btu
Egas,daily = 807,723 Btu/day = 8.08 therms/day
Eelec,daily = Eelec,h + Eelec,i + np × Eelec,p,
Eelec,daily = 5.34 kWh +7.98 kWh +1 × 0.53 kWh
Eelec,daily = 13.85 kWh/day
Step 5—Calculate the average demand as follows:
qavg =
Eelec , daily
,
ton
qavg =
13.85 kWh
,
12.0 h
qavg = 1.15 kW
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
E-3
Energy Cost Model
Step 6—The estimated yearly appliance energy cost may be determined as follows:
Egas, daily
Cgas, yearly = rgas ×
100,000
Btu
therm
× dop
Btu
Cgas, yearly = $1.20
$
therm
×
807,723 day
100,000
Btu
therm
× 365
days
yr
Cgas, yearly = $3,538
Celec, yearly = relec × Eelec, daily × dop
$
Celec, yearly = $0.10 kWh
× 13.85 kWh
day × 365
days
yr
Celec, yearly = $506
5011.06.14
Food Service Technology Center
E-4