European Conference, Brussels, December 2014 Placement of children in institutions or foster care and the best interest of the child Bragi Guðbrandsson, Director General The Gov. Agency for Child Protection, Iceland Introduction CRC, especially on placement International tools relevant to the topic Preventing alternative care – “gatekeeping” Rights of children in alternative care Aftercare - pathways The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Not only quantitatively but also qualitatively different from earlier international agreement The twofold nature of the UN CRC The Descriptive The Normative Dynamic and proactive , generated by the basic principle of the “best interest of the child” A paradigm shift A fundamental change in our perception of children – the 3 p´s Participatory rights children as bearers of rights, active subjects and not passive objects Protective rights needs-focused and childfriendly Rights to provisions sufficiently comprehensive and appropriate to maximize the development of the child potentialities CRC on placement Art 20 defines the conditions under which placement is justified If the child is deprived or his/her family or placement is in the “best interest” of the child The state should “ensure” such placement on the basis of national law Alternative care in family environment, e.g. foster care, adoption or “if necessary in suitable institutions for the care of children” Placement in institutions “Institutions” “suitable” From small “family type” to more complex institutions “institutions … should conform to the standards established by the competent authorities..” Art 3.3 Meets the needs of the individual child at a given moment of time “if necessary” Necessity based on child-focused grounds Not because “nothing else is available” Most relevant international tools UN Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children (2009) CoE; Rec (2005) on the Rights of Children living in Residential Institutions CoE Recommendations on Child-friendly Social Services (2011)12, Positive Parenting (2006)19, on Child participation (2012)2; the Lanzarote Convention (2010) and the Guidelines on Child-friendly justice (2010) General Comments of the Committee on the Rights of the Child and Recommendations, e.g. on children without Parental Care (Day of General Discussion 2005) CoE Rec(2005)5 on the Rights of Children living in Residential Institutions CoE standard setting: an attempt to “operationalize”/“translate” the UN CRC into institutional settings A Recommendation – not a “Convention” The Structure of the Rec.: - Basic Principles - Specific rights - Guidelines and Quality Standards Basic Principles – “gatekeeping“ the family is the natural environment for the wellbeing of the child preventive measures of support for children and families should be provided as far as possible; the placement of a child should remain the exception and have as the primary objective the best interests of the child the placement should be no longer than necessary and subjected to periodic review Preventing alternative care UN Guidelines on alternative care, ch. 4 Promoting parental care Preventing family separation Strategies aimed at children and families at risk Promoting family reintegration Policies and programs to strengthen parent´s ability to care for their children Regular assessment and appropriate contact between the child and his/her family with the aim of reintegration Poverty or disability alone are never be valid reasons for placement, Art 15 CoE Recommendation (2011)12 on Child friendly social services, General elements General social services (prevention) Specialised social services (harm reduction) Comprehensive, preventive and responsive Addresses negative impact of adversive childhood experiences Intensive social services (placement) The principle of appropriateness Family support v.s. Child Placement The inverse relationship between the level of children´s placement and family support/services is well established “Children at risk and in Care” CoE 2006 “Loss of Parental Care Index” (Every Child Russia, 2012 , Joanna Rogers Six Quantitative and qualitative indicators including Loss of PCare, interventions and use of family services Perceptions of children and parents and use of services CoE Recommendation (2006) 19 on Positive Parenting Recommends that governments take all appropriate legislative, administrative, financial and other measures to create the necessary conditions for positive parenting in the best interests of the child.... Conveys key messages to Parents and Professionals alike on evidence based, nonviolent upbringing CoE Rec.(2006)19 Positive Parenting Key Messages to Parents An attempt to “translate” the UN CRC into the family setting: Nurture - corresponds to the child’s need for emotional nourishment, love, warmth and security Structure - refers to setting out standards of appropriate behaviour and role models provided by parents Recognition – refers to each child’s need to be seen, heard and valued as a person Empowerment – refers to the child’s sense of competence and personal control by enhancing the existing strength in the child Evidence based interventions Examples of good practice Norwegian experience: Family Group Conferences Incredible years, (Webster-Stratton model) PMTO (parent management training) MST (multisystematic treatment) MTFC (multi-treatment foster care) MultifunC Social Ecological Model Community Provider Agency School Neighborhood Peers Extended Family Siblings Caregiver CHILD Caregiver 16 MST effect on residential treatment in Iceland Principles of Placement CoERec (2005)5 the procedure…and individual care plan…including a periodic review of the placement, shall guarantee the rights of the child, notably the child's right to be heard should not be longer than necessary .. the parents should be supported .. with the aim of reintegrating the child in the family and society; CoE Rec. (2011)12 When decisions of alternative care cannot be avoided, the principle of appropriateness to the child’s needs identified by a rigorous assessment should be the determining factor with regard to individual decisions The UN Guidelines on Alternative care determination States should ensure the availability of a range of alternative care options Determination of the most appropriate form of care should be based on rigorous assessment, planning and review, through established structures and mechanisms, should be carried out on a case-by-case basis by suitably qualified professionals in a multidisciplinary team after consultation at all stages with the child, according to his/her evolving capacities Residential care should be limited to those cases where such a setting is specifically appropriate, necessary and constructive for the individual child Family based care - Foster care Alternative care for young children, especially those under the age of 3 years, should be provided in family-based settings competent authority responsible for recruitment, assessment, and training of foster parents and assess and match the needs of the child with the abilities and resources of potential foster carers and to prepare all concerned for the placement. Remuneration Allowing for devotion to the care giving role Competence building in Foster Care Investing in competence building crucial for successful system of foster care Foster Pride - Parent´s Resource for Information, Development and Education Standardized structured framework for recruiting, preparing and selecting foster and adoptive parents Pre-service, assessment In-service Foster care not a magical solution Obstacles Difficulties in recruitment Lack of supportive professional network Intensive problems and needs can lead to frequent breakdown of placements Multi-dimensional needs that require professional response and highly structured settings for a period of time Sometimes children prefer not to live in substituted “family environment” Residential care – Quality care CoE (2005)5; examples A small family-type living unit should be provided Individual care plan based on development of the child´s capabilities with respect to his/her autonomy Priority given to physical and mental health as well as harmonious individual development Maintain child-parent contact with the aim of reintegration Educational and proper emotional relationship with the staff Multidisciplinary and child-friendly support Established “Quality Standards”, including “Codes of Ethics” in line with the CRC Coe Rec (2005)5 Specific Rights in residential care To human dignity and to non-degrading treatment be respected including the protection against corporal punishment and all forms of abuse; To participate in decision-making processes and the living conditions in the institution; To be informed about his/her rights and to make complaints to an independent body To privacy, including access to a person they trust and a competent body for confidential advice To education and vocational training under the same condition as all other children To play, sport, cultural activity and increasing responsibility Coe Rec (2005)5 Aftercare – pathway plan A post-care individual plan a child leaving care should be entitled to an assessment of his or her needs and appropriate after-care support in accordance with the aim to ensure the re-integration of the child in the family and society taking into account the child’s wishes and the continuity in his or her life path and his or her fulfillment and own needs UN Guidelines Agencies and facilities should have a clear policy and should carry out agreed procedures …to ensure appropriate aftercare and/or follow-up CoE Rec (2005)5 Monitoring and Accountability all residential institutions should be accredited and registered with the competent public authorities on the basis of regulations and national minimum standards of care; on the basis of these standards, an efficient system of monitoring and external control of residential institutions should be ensured; relevant statistical data should be collected and analysed, and research for the purposes of efficient monitoring should be supported; Ensuring placement Does the national law reflect the CRC and commitments made by the State Which agencies are mandated to accredit placements, implement monitoring procedures and collect statistics Is an independent monitoring system in place? Are quality standards in place or monitoring strategies firmly based on principles of the CRC STATE Ministry of Welfare The Appeal Committee Government Agency for Child Protection The Judicial system “Gatekeeping” Standard setting Competence building Childrens House MST PMT LOCAL AUTHORITIES State Treatment Centre for Adolescents Residential Treatment Homes Pilot Projects Foster Parents Local Child Protection Services Local Authorities General Social Services Cooperation Departments of Social Services school, health care authorities, police a.o. Standards and/or monitoring Specific quality standards of care Quality4Children (http://www.quality4children.info) Standards implicit in national or international laws, guidelines and recommendations Monitoring strategies: application by operationalizing standards AudTrain developed by CBSS “Children at Risk” ( http://www.childcentre.info/) Lanzarote Convention - implications for monitoring residential care Recruitment, training and awareness raising of persons working in contact with children (Art 5) The conditions to accede to those professions Awareness Adequate knowledge Education for children (Art 6) The goal is to ensure an institutional „culture“ that counteracts all forms of violence, exp. sexual abuse Lanzarote Convention Monitoring protection of sexual abuse Staff: Established procedures for the recruitment, training and supervision: Screening (criminal record, personal reference check etc.) Code of Ethics: zero-tolerance policy on abuse Agency rules Client information (victims or offenders) Treatment and behaviour management Children: Education on healthy sexuality as well as enhancing awareness on inappropriate sexual behaviour and sexual abuse in all it´s forms Lanzarote Convention impact on monitoring All residential service providers should have unequivocal rules on Mandatory reporting to the relevant authorities Temporary suspension of suspected staff offender pending investigation Staff offenders will be impeached and prosecuted The safety of the child victim should always be the primary consideration
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz