Human Computational Fluid Dynamics: Analysis of Nose Flow Wolfgang Schröder, Andreas Lintermann, Lennart Schneiders, Jerry Grimmen Institute of Aerodynamics RWTH Aachen University JARA High Performance Computing Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Anatomy of the Nasal Cavity Functions Sense of Smell (Regio olfactoria) Tempering Air (Turbinates) Isolation (Airfilled Cavities) Moistening (Goblet Cells) Resonance Organ (Paranasal Sinuses) Cleaning Air (Ciliated Epithelium) Physiological Data Physiological Respiration through Standard Nose (R. Hincliff, D. Harrison) minute ventilation [1/min ] ventilation frequency [1/min ] tidal volume [ml ] medium respiration maximum respiration 6-8 15 400-500 50-70 25 2000-2800 Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Computer Tomography of the Human Nasal Cavity Human Engineering Surface Extraction by Computer Tomography Marching Cube Algorithm • 300 Cuts, 1mm Spacing • Unstructured Surface • DICOM Format • 749.681 Nodes • 512 512 2 Bytes per Cut • 1.499.065 Triangles Silicone Nose Model Grids clean + upper and lower turb. Numerical Method Navier-Stokes equations, 3D, time dependent Approximation: Finite Volume Method • second-order accuracy for non-Euler terms • AUSM (Advective Upstream Splitting Method) for Euler terms • time integration via 5-step Runge-Kutta method of second-order accuracy Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Horseshoe Vortex The Horseshoe Vortex Vortex Breakdown vortex free stagnation point Vortex Breakdown (cntd.) Inhalation: Streamlines upper and lower turbinate and spurs Comparison Numerics and Experiments Inhalation cross section 1 num. exp. cross section 2 num. exp. Comparison Numerics and Experiments Exhalation cross section 1 num. cross section 2 exp. num. exp. Scheme for Human Respiration Cycle Inhalation/Exhalation Process Pressure Loss vs. Mass Flux Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Engineering Human Human Nasal Cavity via CT-Images Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Grid refinement data structure l0 (80 cells) l1 (O(81) cells) l2 (O(82) cells) l3 (O(83) cells) l0 (1 cell) l1 (8 cells) l2 Octree structure with parent-child relation Boundary refinement l l+2 l+1 l the refined boundary is smoothed by ensuring a level difference of 1 Number of offspring reduction l (M) l+1 l+t l+1 (M) l+ t Moving subtrees to the upper level Splitting of subtrees level l level l + 1 levels l+2 … l+t a copy of the split subtree (n) is introduced to the process Mesh Generation: Sphere Mesh Generation: Dinosaur Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Varying Boundary Cells I • Cut cells may become arbitrarily small • Result in numerical instability • Explicit time integrators require a very small time step to remain stable Small cells must be removed • Abrupt changes of the discrete operators result in perturbations • Smooth transition of leastsquares stencils required • Disappearing cells? Varying Boundary Cells II • Cut cells may become arbitrarily small • Result in numerical instability • Explicit time integrators require a very small time step to remain stable Small cells must be removed • Abrupt changes of the discrete operators result in perturbations • Smooth transition of leastsquares stencils required • Disappearing cells? remain as ghost nodes on the boundary Emerging and Merging Cells nt nt (n + 1) t (n + 1) t Discrete Operator Weighting Functions L. Schneiders et al., JCP 235: 786-809 (2013) Transversely Oscillating Circular Cylinder I Re = 185, yB = A cos (2fet) , A = 0.2D , fe = 0.8 f0 , Sr = f0 D/u = 0.195 locally refined mesh vorticity contours (cyl. at tdc) Transversely Oscillating Circular Cylinder II cell-merging method vs. weighting-function formulation (, w) Dancing Cylinders Vorticity distribution Folie Schneiders Mesh Generation: Nasal Cavity Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Flow through the Human Nasal Cavity Three Nasal Cavities good poor fair “Good” Geometry: Streamlines turbinate “Fair” Geometry: Streamlines “Poor” Geometry: Streamlines “Good” Geometry: Wall-Shear Stress “Fair” Geometry: Wall-Shear Stress Comparison of Three Geometries heating pressure loss good fair poor good fair poor Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Coming Up • Introduction • From the Human Nose to the Engineering Model * laminar or turbulent * steady or unsteady • From the Engineering Model to the Human Nose * General Description * Mesh Generation * Accuracy Issues * Results of the Human Nose: Comparison of 3 Geometries • Conclusion Conclusion The Good: Massively parallel grid generation on HPC systems; numerical and experimental tools to automatically analyze local and global phenomena are available The Bad: Analysis is costly The Ugly: Uncertainty is high due to too little knowledge on bio-medical structures, mucous membrane, tissues, particles etc.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz