Variants of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Practical Issues

Variants of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Practical Issues
Raga Ramachandran, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor and Director of Medical Education, UCSF Pathology
[email protected]
A full copy of the presentation will be available to meeting participants. This text
includes key points to consider in diagnosing variants of hepatocellular carcinoma
that show clear-cell change, fibrosis, or glandular/pseudoglandular architecture.
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the
liver and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. In the liver,
carcinoma is the end result of progression through dysplasia as follows:
• Dysplastic foci (cytologically atypical, less than 1 mm in diameter, identified
incidentally)
• Dysplastic nodules (cytologically and/or structurally atypical), further
subdivided into low-grade and high-grade
Cirrhosis is a significant risk factor for development of HCC, but non-cirrhotic liver
also may form HCC, sometimes from malignant transformation of hepatocellular
adenoma (such as the recently recognized subtype with beta-catenin mutation).
For nodules over 1 cm, the differential includes:
• Large regenerative nodule
• Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodule, including hepatocellular adenoma
• Dysplastic nodule (>1 cm but <3 cm)
• HCC – including early HCC, classic HCC, and variants of HCC
Classic HCC
In order to approach key variants of HCC, the subject of this presentation, it is
important to address characteristic features of well-differentiated HCC. On needle
core biopsy, only some of these features may be seen, so close correlation with
imaging findings, rate of growth of the lesion, and other clinical information is
important:
• Proliferation of hepatocytes arranged in expanded plates (trabeculae, at
least 3 cells thick) and/or acinar/pseudoglandular groups. Compact or solid
areas may be present.
• Lack of normal portal tracts
• Increased arterialization within lesion
• Bile production
• Loss of reticulin staining or intact reticulin outlining irregular architectural
groupings of lesional hepatocytes
When material is limited, the most useful stain as an adjunct to a good H&E stain is a
reticulin stain. Additional unstained sections can be obtained at the time of initial
sectioning to avoid unnecessary loss of tissue. Serum increase in serum alphafetoprotein (AFP) is, in the UCSF experience, not highly sensitive or specific for the
presence of HCC, and immunostaining for AFP is not pursued due to its low
sensitivity, especially in small nodules of HCC.
HCC with clear-cell change
This is a relatively common variant that poses a diagnostic challenge, as it resembles
other epithelioid tumors. HCC with fatty change falls into this category (generally
small, early-stage tumors) as does HCC with steatohepatitis-like change (hepatocyte
ballooning, formation of Mallory-Denk bodies).
The main challenge is constructing and exploring the differential, especially if the
background liver is non-cirrhotic (as can happen with HCC) and especially if tissue
is limited on biopsy. The differential of clear-cell tumors in the liver includes
metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma,
neuroendocrine carcinoma with clear-cell features, melanoma (“balloon cell”
melanoma), epithelioid angiomyolipoma (AML), and mesenchymal tumors with
epithelioid morphology including epithelioid GIST.
Role of immunostains: Specifically within tumors of clear-cell morphology,
immunohistochemistry for Hep Par 1 (hepatocyte antigen) and MOC31 (epithelial
cell adhesion molecule or EPCAM) will sort these possibilities as follows:
Expression pattern
Hep Par 1 diffuse+
MOC31Hep Par 1MOC31+
Hep Par 1+
MOC31+
Hep Par 1MOC31-
Leading considerations
with clear-cell
morphology
HCC
• Neuroendocrine tumor
• RCC
• Hep Par 1-negative HCC
with aberrant MOC31
(rare)
None with classically
clear-cell appearance, but
adenocarcinomas with
aberrant Hep Par 1 such
as lung and
gastroesophageal tumors
may stain this way
Keratin+
• Neuroendocrine tumor
• RCC
• Epithelioid GIST (rarely
keratin-positive)
2
Keratin• Melanoma
• Adrenocortical
carcinoma
• Epithelioid AML
• Sarcomas with
epithelioid morphology
HCCs with a component of fibrosis
The presence of fibrosis within HCC raises a complex differential including
fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLM), scirrhous HCC, cirrhosis-like HCC, and combined
HCC-cholangiocarcinoma).
Fibrolamellar HCC (FLM)
In contrast to most HCC, FLM typically occurs in non-cirrhotic liver in young adults
(mean age, 26 years) and is not associated with any known risk factors. This is an
aggressive tumor with a 5-year survival of 50-60%. Many studies have reported
that FLM has a better outcome than conventional HCC as a whole, but this is likely to
be related to the absence of cirrhosis in FLM, as cirrhosis is a significant adverse
factor in HCC. The outcome of FLM is likely to be similar to that of conventional HCC
arising in non-cirrhotic liver.
It is important to distinguish FLM and conventional HCC as extended hepatic
resection and lymph node dissection are more often performed in FLM.
Unresectable FLM may be treated with chemotherapy and radiation, possibly
becoming amenable to resection after platinum-based chemotherapy.
A triad of morphological features should be adhered to strictly for the diagnosis of
FLM:
• large polygonal tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm
• prominent macronucleoli
• lamellar fibrosis
Cytoplasmic granularity is due to the presence of numerous mitochondria. Tumor
cells also contain “pale bodies” composed of fibrinogen and/or albumin. Pale bodies
are not specific to FLM, as they can be seen in other types of HCC, including
scirrhous HCC.
Role of immunostains: FLMs express markers of hepatocellular differentiation like
Hep Par 1 and polyclonal CEA (canalicular pattern). AFP expression is absent in
FLM, though rare cases may show focal expression in a few tumor cells (and this
stain is not routinely used at UCSF in HCC workup). Glypican-3 is expressed in twothirds of FLM compared to 80% of conventional HCC, while CK7 is expressed in
nearly 80% of FLM compared to 20-30% of conventional HCC. CD68 is highly
3
sensitive for FLM and shows cytoplasmic positivity in a granular, dot-like, or
stippled pattern (see Ross et al).
Diffuse staining with chromogranin or synaptophysin strongly favors a
neuroendocrine tumor, as these markers are generally negative or only focally
positive in most FLMs. Hepatocellular markers like Hep Par 1 and polyclonal CEA
(canalicular pattern) are consistently negative in neuroendocrine tumors.
Scirrhous HCC
Scirrhous HCC is a distinct entity that is not the same as fibrolamellar carcinoma;
the scirrhous pattern accounts for about 5% of all HCC, and most cases contain
background cirrhosis. This tumor may be mistaken for cholangiocarcinoma on
imaging; the hallmark of scirrhous HCC is abundant dense fibrosis admixed with the
malignant hepatocytes that are generally organized into trabeculae, pseudoacinar
structures, or solid nests. Most of the tumors originate just below the liver capsule,
and some multifocal tumors may show areas of classic HCC. The pattern of fibrosis
resembles that seen after treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, or transarterial
chemoembolization).
The literature contains conflicting reports as to the prognosis of scirrhous HCC in
comparison to classic HCC.
Role of immunostains: Hep Par 1 has only 50% sensitivity for this variant, and
MOC31 expression may be more common (UCSF observations). Use of arginase,
polyclonal CEA (canalicular pattern), and glypican-3 (GPC-3) as additional
hepatocellular markers is helpful. Scirrhous HCC may express CK7 or CK19,
possibly associated with poorer prognosis.
Cirrhosis-like HCC
Rare patients with cirrhosis have multifocal HCC with small cirrhosis-like nodules.
Individual tumor cells resemble conventional HCC, but their growth pattern is
unusual. Generally there is no mass seen on imaging. This is an insidious tumor as
it often is not clinically suspected and may only be identified incidentally on a
staging biopsy, in an explant, or at autopsy. Grossly, small cirrhosis-like tumor
nodules are present and in some cases appear distinct from adjacent background
cirrhotic nodules in color. Microscopically, tumor tends to be well- or moderatelydifferentiated, often with ballooning, Mallory-Denk bodies, and cholestasis.
Presence of small foci of HCC on multiple needle cores from a single biopsy
procedure may increase suspicion for cirrhosis-like HCC. Sometimes cirrhosis-like
HCC may co-exist with a dominant nodule of classic/conventional HCC. This is an
evolving topic, and it remains unknown whether prognosis after transplantation is
any different from that of conventional HCC.
Role of immunostains: No specific utility. A good reticulin stain is helpful to identify
foci of HCC. Correlation with gross findings is important to make this diagnosis.
4
Combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma
Though combined tumors are rare, they may show fibrosis. Combined HCCcholangiocarcinoma is discussed in more detail below.
HCC with pseudoglandular architecture
The main differential here, particularly on needle core biopsy, is pseudoglandular
HCC versus HCC-cholangiocarcinoma or a pure cholangiocarcinoma. In comparison
to malignant glandular tumors, HCC has a relative lack of desmoplastic stroma. This
pattern of HCC does not exhibit mucin production. There is no consensus on
defining a CC component within combined HCC-CC, but the presence of
intracytoplasmic or luminal mucin is compelling evidence for a CC component
Per WHO criteria, combined HCC-CC contains closely mixed elements of HCC and CC
showing appropriate phenotypic properties of each individual tumor. This type of
combined HCC-CC comprises less than 1% of all HCC, may be more aggressive than
either HCC or CC alone, and may show portal or hepatic vein invasion or lymph node
metastasis at the time of presentation. Per the 1985 classification of Goodman et al.,
there are three subtypes:
Type I – collision tumor with apparently coincidental HCC and CC in the same liver
Type II – transitional tumor with elements of HCC closely associated and apparently
transitioning to elements of CC
Type III – fibrolamellar type, resembles fibrolamellar HCC but with mucinproducing pseudoglands
A recent case series from UCSF identified mixed HCC-cholangiocarcinoma or
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the explants of 14 patients who underwent
liver transplant for HCC (see Sapisochin et al). These patients had a high tumor
recurrence rate (8/14 after a 32-month median follow-up).
Role of immunostains: Areas of hepatocellular origin will be highlighted by Hep Par
1 and arginase, while MOC31 and CK19 or CK7 can be helpful to identify
cholangiolar components. However, CK19/CK7 should not be relied upon to make
the diagnosis, as the biopsy could represent HCC with CK19/CK7 expression; this
phenotype may be seen in noncirrhotic livers, and this expression pattern is
associated with a poorer prognosis.
Useful references
General and HCC with clear-cell change
Liver Pathology. Demos Medical, New York 2011. Eds. Ferrell LD and Kakar S.
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. IARC, Lyon 2010. Eds.
Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND.
5
Kakar S, Gown AM, Goodman ZD, Ferrell LD. Best practices in diagnostic
immunohistochemistry: hepatocellular carcinoma versus metastatic neoplasms.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1648-1654.
Zhou X, Yearsley MM, Jones K, Frankel WL. Hepatocellular carcinomas occasionally
express neuroendocrine markers while neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the
liver do not show hepatocellular expression. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(Suppl 1):378A.
Fibrolamellar HCC
Berman MA, Burnham JA, Sheahan DG. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: an
immunohistochemical study of nineteen cases and a review of the literature. Hum
Pathol. 1988;19:784-94.
Craig J, Peters R, Edmondson H, Omata M. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: a
tumor of adolescents and young adults with distinctive clinicopathologic features.
Cancer. 1980; 46:372-379.
El-Serag HB, Davila JA. Is fibrolamellar carcinoma different from hepatocellular
carcinoma? A US population-based study. Hepatology. 2004;39:798-803.
Kakar S, Burgart LJ, Batts KP, Garcia J, Jain D, Ferrell LD. Clinicopathologic features
and survival in fibrolamellar carcinoma: comparison with conventional
hepatocellular carcinoma with and without cirrhosis. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:14171423.
Maniaci V, Davidson BR, Rolles K, Dhillon AP, Hackshaw A, Begent RH, Meyer T.
Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: prolonged survival with multimodality
therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:617-621.
Ross HM, Daniel HD, Vivekanandan P, Kannangai R, Yeh MM, Wu TT, Makhlour HR,
Torbenson M. Fibrolamellar carcinomas are positive for CD68. Mod Pathol.
2011;24(3):390-395.
Torbenson M. Review of the clinicopathologic features of fibrolamellar
carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14:217-23.
Cirrhosis-like HCC
Jakate S, Yabes A, Giusto D, Naini B, Lassman C, Yeh MM, Ferrell LD. Diffuse
cirrhosis-like hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinically and radiographically undetected
variant mimicking cirrhosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Jul;34(7):935-941.
Scirrhous HCC
Matsuura S, Aishima S, Taguchi K, Asayama Y, Terashi T, Honda H, Tsuneyoshi M.
“Scirrhous” type hepatocellular carcinomas: a special reference to expression of
cytokeratin 7 and hepatocyte paraffin 1. Histopathol. 2005;47:382-390.
6
Kurogi M, Nakashima O, Miyaaki H, Fujimoto M, Kojiro M. Clinicopathological study
of scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(9):14701477.
Combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma
Goodman ZD, Ishak KG, Langloss JM, Sesterhenn IA, Rabin L. Combined
hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. A histologic and immunohistochemical study.
Cancer. 1985;55:124-135.
Sapisochin G, Fidelman N, Roberts JP, Yao FY. Mixed hepatocellular
cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing
transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2011 Aug;17(8):934942.
7