CompEd Meetings
evaluation results
Supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway
Small size bilateral cooperation projects - RO 015 SEE nr. 11/02.09.2016
www.eeagrants.org
www.see‐burse.ro
The structure of the sample
Locations
Participants
(respondents)
N=169
Events
Joint study-analysis in welfare, health and
social care
Trondheim
Iasi
19.53 %
80.47 %
Service innovation: opportunities and
inventory of policies and practices
Peer workers’ contributions in developing
welfare, health and social services collaboration between education and peer
workers
Open up to service innovation: resources
from Romania and Norway
Position in organization of
the participants
Institutions/organizations
UAIC
73.96 %
Student
83.43 %
NTNU
18.93 %
Professor
7.69 %
Service provider
7.10 %
Service provider
4.73 %
Service user
4.14 %
How would you generally appreciate the project meeting?
IMPORTANT
16%
84%
Yes
No
How would you generally appreciate the project meeting?
USEFUL
22%
78%
Yes
No
How would you generally appreciate the project meeting?
OPPORTUNE
11%
89%
Yes
No
What is the measure the meeting have met your expectations? (%)
(1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
40.00
34.32
35.00
32.54
27.81
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
2.37
2.96
1
2
0.00
3
4
5
What is the measure the meeting have met the project
objectives? (%)
(1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
50.00
39.05
40.00
36.09
30.00
17.75
20.00
10.00
6.51
0.59
0.00
1
2
3
4
5
What is the measure the meeting have sustained the opportunity
of working together?
(%) (1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
35.00
31.95
30.00
29.59
30.18
4
5
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
6.51
1.78
0.00
1
2
3
Does the meeting contribute to a bilateral partnership? (%)
(1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
45.00
40.24
40.00
36.09
35.00
30.00
25.00
17.75
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
4.73
1.18
0.00
1
2
3
4
5
Does the meeting clarify the methodology of data collection? (%)
(1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
33.73
33.73
4
5
26.63
4.73
1.18
1
2
3
The meeting offered you new ideas for professional development?
(%) (1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
42.01
33.14
17.75
1.78
1
5.33
2
3
4
5
Activities mentioned at the preamble of the seminar were fulfilled?
(%) (1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
45.56
50.00
40.00
34.32
30.00
20.00
10.00
14.20
1.18
4.73
0.00
1
2
3
4
5
The meeting was an opportunity for knowledge transfer on
education and practice? (%)
(1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
60.00
48.52
50.00
40.00
32.54
30.00
20.00
10.00
13.02
2.37
3.55
1
2
0.00
3
4
5
How do you evaluate logistics & organizations of the meeting?
(%) (1-smallest value; 5-highest value)
46.15
50.00
40.00
33.14
30.00
15.98
20.00
10.00
0.59
4.14
0.00
1
2
3
4
5