Investigation (Unit 2) Question: When and why should people change their minds? Why do historians, scientists, and others care about this question? The development of collective learning is a central theme not only in this course, but in the history of ideas as well. “In science,” Carl Sagan once wrote, “it often happens that scientists say, ‘You know that’s a really good argument; my position is mistaken,’ and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again.” In developing a “modern origin story,” big historians rely on the most compelling ideas from all the disciplines, acutely aware that these ideas often undergo profound change. A powerful example of this is our switch from the geocentric view of the Universe to the heliocentric view. Why should teachers and students care about this question? This investigation is a baseline writing assessment. Students are to use the documents in the Investigation Library and their understanding of our shift from the geocentric view of the Universe to the heliocentric view to develop an argument about when and why people should change their minds. The investigation helps assess students’ initial skills in comprehending a range of texts — pictures, primary and secondary sources — and in applying what they learn to write an argument for when and why people should change their minds, using Copernicus and Galileo as case studies. Students must write their essay in class. We encourage you to give the question and the texts to them in advance. They may use their notes and handouts to write their answer. Please allow about 40 minutes in class for students to write a four‐ to five‐paragraph, evidence‐based argument explaining when and why people should change their minds. Primary Sources • Path of the planets • Galileo’s letter to Kepler • Galileo discovers the moons of Jupiter • Galileo’s telescope Secondary Sources • The geocentric view • Epicycles • Copernicus’s heliocentric view • The heliocentric view grows in popularity When writing about documents… Your essay needs to make reference to ALL of the documents that are part of the Investigation Library. You do not need to use direct quotes; in fact you should keep this to a minimum. But when you write about a document, you do not need to write “In document ___ it says…”. Instead you should write about how the document supports your thesis/topic sentence and then just put (Doc #) at the end of the sentence. For example: Carl Sagan, an American astronomer and cosmologist, explains that our ancestors supported Ptolemy’s geocentric view because they saw with the naked eye that everything revolved around the Earth (Doc 1). Planning Your Essay for Investigation #2 Paragraph #1: Your thesis paragraph. Respond to the prompt in the space below (do not write in 1st person). A possible sentence would be “People should change their mind ________________________________ because ____________________________.” Connect your response to what you have learned in the unit and to Copernicus and Galileo. An example would be “A powerful historical example of this process is when scientists changed their view of the Universe from being geocentric to heliocentric. Two leading scientists of the time, Copernicus and Galileo, led the efforts to change people’s minds.” Paragraph #2: The Geocentric View If you are writing about change, you have to start with how something was originally. This paragraph is going to explain the geocentric view and why Ptolemy and our ancestors would have logically believed this view. Complete the chart below. What information can you take from that document/picture that will help with your Documents that explain explanation of the geocentric view? Be specific and use short, exact quotes if possible. the geocentric view (just write the number) Paragraph #3: The Heliocentric View Now your focus shifts to the heliocentric view. In this paragraph, you’re going to explain how Copernicus and Galileo came to their new conclusions about the Universe. What evidence did they have that challenged Ptolemy? What information can you take from that document/picture that will help with your Documents that explain the heliocentric view (just explanation of the heliocentric view? Be specific and use short, exact quotes if possible. write the number) Paragraph #4: Connecting the Example to the Question Now that you’ve explained both views it’s time to explain the PROCESS that took place. This wasn’t just a couple of scientists who changed their minds. Their views eventually became the accepted view for most people. However, that process wasn’t easy and both Copernicus and Galileo faced many challenges in their efforts to change people’s minds. This is where you would talk about that process using examples from Document 8 (the timeline in the change in collective learning) and what you already know from the unit about Copernicus, Galileo, and other scientists that supported these revolutionary ideas. A key element of this paragraph is in explaining how and why certain people and/or groups (for example the Roman Catholic Church) would have disagreed with Copernicus and Galileo. Go on to explain how despite the disagreement, their views still became the standard view of the Universe until Hubble’s time. Wrap up your essay by restating your thesis and summarizing your explanation. You can do this in a separate concluding paragraph or at the end of the paragraph #4. Write some of your ideas/notes for paragraph 4 in the box below. Unit 2 Investigation Essay Rubric 10-9 points 8 points 7 points 6 points Content Knowledge Extremely knowledgeable of content. Uses appropriate evidence to support thesis throughout essay. Knowledgeabl e of the content and supports thesis with evidence throughout essay. Basic knowledge of the content. Mostly supports thesis with evidence. Little content knowledge. Has difficulty supporting thesis with evidence. Organization Structure is clear and appropriate for writing type; includes clear introduction, welldeveloped body, and clear conclusion; writing is organized logically into paragraphs and sentences with transitions. Structure is generally clear and appropriate to writing type; includes introduction, body, and conclusion; writing is organized into paragraphs and sentences with transitions. Structure may be partially unclear, inappropriate, or lacking; introduction or conclusion is lacking or minimal; organization of paragraphs or construction of sentences is flawed. Structure is largely unclear, inappropriate, or lacking; introduction or conclusion is missing; there are significant flaws in the organization of paragraphs or construction of sentences. Thesis statement is clearly stated but lacks strength in language. The thesis is Presented, but is ambiguous, weak, or unclear. Uses all 8 documents and references them correctly in the writing. Uses all 8 documents and references them in the writing, although not correctly. Uses at least half of the documents and references them correctly in the writing. Flawless spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Some minor spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes. Skillfully evaluates information gathered from observation, experience, reflection, or reasoning. Adequately demonstrates reasonable relationships among ideas. Thesis Use of documents Mechanics Critical Thinking a. precision b. depth c. accuracy d. logic Notes The thesis is presented clearly and uses strong language. The thesis is poorly stated, hard to find or understand. 5-0 points Student does not grasp content. No organization of essay is attempted. No thesis is evident. Total /10 /10 /10 Uses at least half of the documents and references them in the writing, although not correctly. Does not address the documents in the writing. Careless spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes. Significant spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes throughout. Essay is difficult to understand because of spelling and grammar errors. /10 Simplistic analysis of complex issue; limited clarity and complexion of thought. Insufficient reasoning and lacks complexity of thought. No analysis is attempted. /10 Total Points: /60
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz