Protection In the Stage 5 History course, the study of the changing rights and freedoms of Aboriginal peoples is compulsory. In Aboriginal peoples, you look at how state and federal government policies towards Aboriginal peoples have changed over time and the impact of these policies. Can you recall what you have learnt during your previous years at school, including Primary School and Stage 4, about the treatment of Aboriginal peoples before Federation? Write down any notes if you wish. ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Some of the things you may have thought of are: Part 2 • dispossession of land and resources of Aboriginal peoples • fighting between Aboriginal peoples and Europeans • Aboriginal massacres, such as the Myall Creek Massacre in 1838 • paternalism – the government acting like a ‘father figure’ to Aboriginal peoples because they believed they knew what was right and therefore controlled all aspects of Aboriginal peoples’ lives • government-run reserves • church-run missions • diseases, brought to Australia by Europeans, that killed thousands of Aboriginal people. Aboriginal Peoples 5 The policy of protection At the time of Federation, individual state governments followed a policy of ‘protection’ for Aboriginal peoples. In NSW, it started in 1883 when the Aborigines Protection Board was set up. From 1909, the Aborigines Protection Act (NSW) legislated that ‘the Minister may exercise a general supervision and care over all Aboriginal peoples and over all matters affecting the interests and welfare of Aboriginal peoples’. All other states adopted similar paternalistic laws. However, in ‘Aboriginal Peoples’, you will concentrate on NSW policy. The Aborigines Protection Board’s policy for protecting Indigenous Australians was that all Aboriginal peoples were to live on reserves. The Board had three reasons for this policy – to protect Aboriginal peoples, to ensure they lived separately from whites, and to ‘keep an eye on them’. The Aborigines Protection Board wanted all Aboriginal peoples to live on government reserves or church-run missions. As well as keeping them segregated from white society, the Board thought they could monitor the Aboriginal peoples’ activities and force their own European culture on the Aboriginal population. Reserves and missions All states and the Northern Territory had reserves or missions where Aboriginal peoples were expected to live. These reserves were generally on the outskirts of towns, as the white population didn’t want the Aboriginal peoples living too close. This fact made getting jobs difficult for the Indigenous Australians. By 1939, there were over 180 reserves in NSW. As you can see in the following photograph, these reserves were similar to the shanty towns occupied by the unemployed during the Depression. The difference was that the unemployed were forced to live in shantytowns because of financial hardship. Aboriginal peoples were forced to live on reserves because of the colour of their skin. 6 Changing Rights and Freedoms Photo of housing on an Aboriginal reserve in Wellington NSW, about 1930 Source Archives Authority of NSW Does this remind you of any photographs you saw while studying the Great Depression? Life on a reserve A government-appointed manager, who received government funding, ran each reserve. The manager had total control over the lives of the Aboriginal peoples living there. The reserve managers had the right to: Part 2 • search Aboriginal peoples, their homes and confiscate property • read any mail addressed to Aboriginal peoples • order medical inspections • send people to other reserves, thereby breaking up families • order Aboriginal peoples to work at the reserve for no pay • force children to sleep in dormitories away from their family. Aboriginal Peoples 7 Life on a reserve was very strict. Some of the rules Aboriginal peoples had to obey included: • they were not allowed to speak their own language. They had to speak English • traditional ceremonies were forbidden • Aboriginal peoples were forced to wear European-style clothing and attend church • Aboriginal peoples were not allowed to marry without the reserve manager’s permission • Aboriginal peoples were not permitted to leave or have visitors without the manager’s permission. Activity 1 Answer the question based on the reserve rules for Aboriginal peoples. How were these rules paternalistic? (Hint: you may need to look up the word ‘paternalism’ in the glossary) __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Check your response by going to the suggested answers section. Missions were run similarly to reserves but had a Christian missionary in charge. This meant that there was a greater emphasis placed on attending church. Often Aboriginal people were made to attend church every day. 8 Changing Rights and Freedoms Why did Aboriginal peoples need protection? There were several massacres of Aboriginal peoples and random killings by white settlers during the nineteenth century. These killings did not stop when the six colonies became the Federation of Australia in the twentieth century. During the 1920s there were several more massacres. Coniston Station massacre The 1928 massacre on Coniston Station in Central Australia caused great alarm within the Aboriginal community and the missionaries who were living with them. A group of Aboriginal men killed Frederick Brooks, a local white dingo trapper because he had kidnapped and abused some Indigenous Walbiri women. A mounted policeman, Constable Murray, and six other white men set out to find and arrest Brooks’ murderers. They hunted the district killing many Aboriginal men, women and children. Eventually they arrested two Aboriginal men for the murder of Brooks. There was a great outcry from the missionaries about the killing of so many Aboriginal people. Following the trial, where both Aboriginal men were acquitted, there were even more protests. The government decided to hold an official inquiry into the incident in 1929. The inquiry consisted of two police inspectors and a government representative. There were no missionaries or Aboriginal people at the inquiry. The inquiry found Constable Murray and his group had killed 31 Aboriginal people but they had acted in self-defence. The level of public anger to the inquiry’s findings was greater than after the Myall Creek Massacre nearly a century earlier. But there was still a fairly disinterested reaction from much of Australia’s white population to the verdict. Although the official inquiry found 31 Aboriginal people had been killed, many historians believe the real number of Aboriginal men, women and children who were killed could be as many as 100. Part 2 Aboriginal Peoples 9 Protest movements The so-called ‘protection’ of Aboriginal peoples was not working, as the Coniston Massacre showed. The continual poor treatment of Aboriginal peoples resulted in the formation of groups who protested against the paternalistic practices of the government. The Australian Aboriginal League One group set up to protest against the difficulties faced by Aboriginal peoples was the Australian Aboriginal League (AAL). It was formed in Melbourne in 1932 by William Cooper. The purpose of the AAL was to draw attention to the difficulties faced by Indigenous Australians and the many injustices they faced. In 1935 the AAL called on the Federal Government to: • allow Aboriginal representation in parliament • establish a National Department of Native Affairs and state advisory councils for Aboriginal interests. Activity 2 Answer the following question. Why would the AAL want a National Department of Aboriginal Affairs? __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Check your response by going to the suggested answers section. 10 Changing Rights and Freedoms Although there were debates in Parliament, there was no action on the AAL’s call for federal control over Aboriginal affairs or Aboriginal representation in parliament. In October 1937, Cooper presented a petition protesting to the Federal Government about Aboriginal hardship and asked that the petition be delivered to King George V. The government declared the petition unconstitutional on the grounds that Aboriginal peoples were not Australian citizens. After the government’s refusal to send the petition, Cooper called a meeting to discuss further ways of protesting. He suggested holding a Day of Mourning on Australia Day 1938, to publicise the grievances of Indigenous Australians. Cooper and others believed that instead of celebrating the 150th anniversary of white settlement, they should be mourning the loss of traditional Aboriginal society. The Aboriginal Progressive Association Prior to the AAL’s formation, the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association had been set up in Sydney. It met from 1924 until 1927, but after continued harassment from the police, it stopped meeting. In 1937, William Ferguson, an Aboriginal shearer, called a public meeting in Dubbo to re establish the Aboriginal Progressive Association (APA). The main aims of the APA were to obtain: • full citizenship rights for Aboriginal peoples • Aboriginal representation in Parliament • the abolition of the Aboriginal Protection Board. Why do you think the APA wanted to abolish the Aboriginal Protection Board? By the end of 1937, the Aboriginal community was becoming organised and demanding political rights and equality. The AAL and APA together planned a national Day of Mourning. Go to the exercises section and complete Exercises 2.1 to 2.3 as directed by your teacher. Part 2 Aboriginal Peoples 11 12 Changing Rights and Freedoms
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz