Feasibility Analysis for a Manned Mars Free-Return Mission in 2018 Future In-Space Operations (FISO) telecon colloquium Dennis Tito, Taber MacCallum, John Carrico, Mike Loucks 3 April, 2013 Authors Dennis A. Tito Wilshire Associates Incorporated Grant Anderson Paragon Space Development Corporation Michel E. Loucks Space Exploration Engineering Corporation John P. Carrico, Jr. Applied Defense Solutions, Inc. Taber MacCallum Paragon Space Development Corporation Jonathan Clark, MD Center for Space Medicine Baylor College Of Medicine Jane Poynter Paragon Space Development Corporation Barry Finger Paragon Space Development Corporation Thomas H. Squire Thermal Protection Materials NASA Ames Research Center Gary A Lantz Paragon Space Development Corporation S. Pete Worden Brig. Gen., USAF, Ret. NASA AMES Research Center Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 2 Background o Worked on first Mars flyby trajectory at JPL: Mariner 4 • Presented at the 2nd Annual AIAA Meeting o Started researching trajectories for human deep space missions o This research led to the identification of a rare, 501-day, “Quick Free-return” Mars fly-by launch opportunity in January, 2018 o Commissioned feasibility study for publication at IEEE Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 3 Moonish R. Patel, James M. Longuski, Jon A. Sims, Mars Free Return Trajectories, JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, Vol. 35, No. 3, May–June 1998 Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 4 Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 5 Trajectory o A 501-day “free-return” Mars flyby passing within a hundred miles of the surface • Only small correction maneuvers are needed during transit o Simple mission architecture lowers risk • No entry into Mars atmosphere o An exceptionally quick free return occurs twice every 15 years • 1.4 years duration vs. 2 to 3.5 years typical • Launch Jan 5, 2018, (or 2031) • Mars on 20 Aug 2018 (227 days) • Earth on 20 May 2019 (274 days) • At Mars, Earth is 38,000,000 miles away o Video • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBGlY Nd2tmA Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 6 Trajectory Targeting Optimized 2-body/patched-conic trajectory values from Mission Analysis Environment (MAnE, from Space Flight Solutions): Leg Stay Time (days) 1 2 Earth 0.0000 Mars Depart JAN 5, 2018, 7.1756 hours GMT Julian Date 58123.7990 AUG 20, 2018, 7.8289 hours GMT Julian Date 58350.8262 Leg 1 2 Arrive AUG 20, 2018, 7.8289 hours GMT Julian Date 58350.8262 MAY 21, 2019, 20.9618 hours GMT Julian Date 58625.3734 Total Duration Mars Earth V Inf V Inf (km/s) (km/s) 6.22697 5.42540 5.42540 8.91499 Flight Time (days) 227.0272 274.5472 501.5744 Fully numerically integrated trajectory (using JPL 421 Ephemerides) values from STK/Astrogator (From Analytical Graphics, Inc.) Leg Stay Time (days) 1 2 Depart Earth 0.0000 Leg 1 2 Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks Mars Flight Time (days) Arrive 5 Jan 2018 07:00:00.000 UTCG 20 Aug 2018 08:18:19.619 UTCG V Inf Departure V peri (km/s) 6.232 5.417 Mars Earth 20 Aug 2018 08:18:19.619 UTCG 21 May 2019 13:52:48.012 UTCG Total Duration C3 V Inf Arrival V peri (km/s) (km2/s2) (km/s) (km/s) (km2/s2) 12.578 7.272 38.835 29.344 5.417 8.837 7.272 14.18 29.344 78.094 FISO 3 April, 2013 227.05439374 274.23227306 501.2866668 C3 7 Mar’s Motion Relative to Trajectory (4) Trans Mars Injection Burn (3)Low Earth Checkout and Deployment (9) Trans Earth Trajectory (8) Mars Encounter Exit (10) Earth Reentry Sequence (1) Launch Fuel Supply ? (2) Launch Human Crew (11)Land on Earth (7) Mars Proximity Trajectory (6) Mars Encounter Entrance (5) Trans Mars Trajectory Phase Events: Launch Fuel Supply: TMI - 1 Months ? Launch Human Crew: TMI - < 2 Weeks Trans Mars Injection: TMI Mars Encounter Entrance: TMI + 8 Mo Mars Encounter Exit: TMI + 8 Mo Earth Reentry Sequence: TMI + 8 Mo Land on Earth: TMI + 17 Mo Phases (Durations): Low Earth Checkout and Deployment: < 2 Weeks Trans Mars Trajectory: 8 Months Mars Proximity: ~ 24 hours Trans Earth Trajectory: 9 Months Earth Reentry Phase: 24 Hours Event Phase Calendar Ground Network Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18 May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 DSN/Other* NEN/USN/TDRSS Sep 18 Oct 18 DSN/Other MPT Phase Trans Mars Trajectory LEO C&D Low Earth Orbit Phase: 1) Fuel Supply Launch ? 2) Human Crew Launch 3) Crew & Fuel Rendezvous ? 4) Systems Checkout 5) Inflatable Deployment 6) Trans Mars Injection Burn Calendar Ground Network Nov 18 Dec 18 • Jan 19 NEN begins to transition out Trans Earth Trajectory DSN/Other/MRO/MAVEN Mars Periareion 20 Aug 2018 Feb 19 Mar 19 Apr 19 May 19 MAVEN - 2013 DSN/Other** NEN/USN ERP Phase MRO – 2005 Trans Earth Trajectory (Cont’d) ** NEN begins to transition in Perihelion - 11 Mar 2019 Earth Reentry Phase: 1) Upper Stage Jettison 2) Inflatable Jettison 3) Entry Interface Attitude Alignment 4) Atmospheric Entry 5) Parachute Deployment 6) Land On Earth AU Miles Trajectory Perspective Black = Spacecraft distance from Earth (miles) Green = Spacecraft distance from Mars (miles) Red = Spacecraft distance from the Sun in Astronomical Units (AU) Object Distance From Sun Mars Orbital Track Mars Flyby Spacecraft Trajectory Earth Orbital Track Venus Orbital Track *Venus is not present when the spacecraft is at perihelion Perihelion (Close to Venus Orbit*) Falcon Heavy Option Graphic courtesy SpaceX o First flight scheduled for 2013 o Man-rated design o 53,000 kg to LEO o 10,000 kg to Mars for this mission o Free-return trajectory enables upper stage to stay attached for shielding Falcon Heavy Graphic courtesy SpaceX Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 12 ULA Options o Option 1: • Launch 1: Atlas 552: includes 18.1 mT useable propellant • Launch 2: Atlas 552: with 10.5 mT payload o Option 2: • Launch 1: Atlas 552: with 10.5 mT payload • Launch 2: Delta HLV: with 10.5 mT payload Transfer 12 mT of propellant Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 13 SLS – Option MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 14 Earth Reentry Overview o Atmospheric reentry vehicles require thermal protection systems (TPS) because they are subjected to intense heating o The level of the heating is dependent on: • • • • Vehicle shape Entry speed and flight trajectory Atmospheric composition TPS material composition & surface properties o Reentry heating to the vehicle comes from two primary Sources • Convective heating from both the flow of hot gas past the surface of the vehicle and catalytic chemical recombination reactions at the surface • Radiation heating from the energetic shock layer in front of the vehicle Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 15 Looked at Aerocapture initially Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 16 Reentry Heating Parameters o Magnitude of stagnation heating is dependent on a variety of parameters, including reentry speed (V), vehicle effective radius (R), and atmospheric density (ρ) ρ qconv ∝ V 3 R 0.5 q rad ∝ V 8 ρ 1.2 R 0.5 Convective Heating Shock Radiation Heating o As reentry speed increases, both convective and radiation heating increase • At high speeds, such as 14.2 Km/s, radiation heating can quickly dominate o As the effective vehicle radius increases, convective heating decreases, but radiation heating increases o Reentry g-loading is a parameter we are considering Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 R 2R V 17 Flight Concept MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 18 ECLSS Launch Mass Legend: Basis System Consumables + Packaging CR-2006-213694 /corrected to replace Biomass with additional packaged food MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 19 Environmental Control and Life Support MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 20 ECLSS Resources: 2 Person Crew for 501 Days Subsystem Mass 1 (kg) Air Vol 2 (m) 3 Peak 1 Power (W) Avg Power (W) 897 1.7 2,626 1,870 Water 2,235 5.1 529 193 Food 1,384 4.0 3 1,860 39 Thermal 479 1.0 300 99 Crew Waste 259 0.7 174 7 Human Accommodations 347 1.8 Basic System 2,470 6.6 5,189 2,109 Consumables 3,131 7.7 - - 5,601 14.3 5,489 2,109 Total = 1 2 3 - - Mass and power estimates based on ANSI/AIAA G-020-1992, Guide for Estimating and Budgeting Weight and Power Contingencies For Spacecraft Systems Volumes are total volume and do not account for packaging factors Errata corrected from paper (estimated food volume is 4 m3) MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 21 ECLSS Test Facility MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 22 Radiation Environment Risk Assessment o Mission occurs during solar minimum o Expert consensus: risk is manageable o Multiple dose mitigation strategies can be used to reduce the risk Risk of Exposure-Induced Death 500-d Mars Flyby (GCR + SPEprob) MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 • Upper stage & propellant residuals • Water storage placement • Crew selection • Dietary/pharmaceuticals 23 Psychological and Behavioral Health MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 24 Conclusion o Completed initial conceptual feasibility study o Ongoing development includes • • • • • • • Schedule & Program Human Health and Radiation Launch (technical assessment) Spacecraft architecture ECLSS TPS assessment Trajectory optimization o Expand interaction with NASA, aerospace industry, and academia MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks FISO 3 April, 2013 25
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz