Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Provost: Lawrence Schovanec
Table - Provost Evaluated by Chairs/Asst.Deans Evaluating the Provost
Survey participation: 71 (43%)
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 71
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to low
ratings (4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
1
2
3
4
5
Actively
promotes
research and
scholarly
excellence
Actively
promotes
teaching
excellence
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
71
4.45
5
5
3
0.60
0.07
71
4.35
5
4
3
0.67
0.08
70
4.33
5
4
3
0.67
0.08
71
4.44
5
5
1
0.85
0.10
71
4.21
5
4
1
0.90
0.11
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
0
0
4
31
36
71
0
0
8
30
33
71
0
0
8
31
31
70
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
43.7%
50.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
11.3%
42.3%
46.5%
100%
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
6
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts
fair and
rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
university
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
70
3.99
5
4
1
1.03
0.12
71
4.27
5
4
2
0.71
0.08
68
4.28
5
4
2
0.80
0.10
70
4.14
5
4
1
0.88
0.11
71
4.31
5
5
1
0.91
0.11
65
3.92
5
4
1
1.13
0.14
69
3.97
5
4
1
0.95
0.11
69
4.01
5
4
1
0.91
0.11
71
3.99
5
4
1
1.07
0.13
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
3
4%
1
1%
0
0%
6
8%
2
3%
2
3%
1
2
5
20
43
71
2
2
5
32
30
71
3
3
11
28
25
70
0
1
8
33
29
71
0
2
9
25
32
68
1
3
8
31
27
70
2
2
4
27
36
71
4
2
14
20
25
65
1
4
14
27
23
69
0.0%
0.0%
11.4%
44.3%
44.3%
100%
1.4%
2.8%
7.0%
28.2%
60.6%
100%
2.8%
2.8%
7.0%
45.1%
42.3%
100%
4.3%
4.3%
15.7%
40.0%
35.7%
100%
0.0%
1.4%
11.3%
46.5%
40.8%
100%
0.0%
2.9%
13.2%
36.8%
47.1%
100%
1.4%
4.3%
11.4%
44.3%
38.6%
100%
2.8%
2.8%
5.6%
38.0%
50.7%
100%
6.2%
3.1%
21.5%
30.8%
38.5%
100%
No low ratings
21.0
15.5
8.8
62.0
28.5
14.5
15.8
7.5
Seeks
Effectively
Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
university
interests
making
11
12
Conducts fair
Has a clear
and rigorous
strategic plan
processes to
and allocates
appoint
resources
administrators at
consistently
the university
with that plan
level
13
14
15
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
university
ALL
68
4.16
5
4
1
0.93
0.11
70
4.14
5
4
1
0.91
0.11
1116
4.19
5
4
1
0.87
0.03
0
0%
3
4%
1
1%
20
2%
1
3
13
29
23
69
4
2
11
28
26
71
1
3
10
24
30
68
1
3
10
27
29
70
21
32
142
443
478
1116
1.4%
5.8%
20.3%
39.1%
33.3%
100%
1.4%
4.3%
18.8%
42.0%
33.3%
100%
5.6%
2.8%
15.5%
39.4%
36.6%
100%
1.5%
4.4%
14.7%
35.3%
44.1%
100%
1.4%
4.3%
14.3%
38.6%
41.4%
100%
1.9%
2.9%
12.7%
39.7%
42.8%
100%
10.0
13.0
9.0
13.5
14.0
17.4
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
Institutional Research, 1/29/2016, page 1 of 1