One of These Things is not Like the Others – Prevalence of Non-target Species in Commercial Baitfish in Ontario Jeff Brinsmead1, Brenda Koenig1, David Copplestone1, D. Andrew R. Drake2, Nicholas Mandrak2, Shelley Arnott3, David Marcogliese4 and Christoper Jerde5 1 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 3Queen’s University 4 Environment Canada, 5University of Notre Dame National Fish and Wildlife Conservation Congress Ottawa, Ontario, May 29, 2012 The Bait Industry in Ontario • • • use of live bait is part of Ontario’s fishing heritage long industry history – commercial licences since ~1925 2011 commercial bait licences: • • • • • 2 harvesters ~ 530 dealers ~ 630 primarily wild caught bait Ontario’s recreational fishery: ~ 1.3M anglers, >$2.5B fisheries-related expenditures retail value of bait circa 2005 = ~ $23M 2005 recreational angler survey: 2nd most popular bait/tackle used was live baitfish (54% of anglers) ~ 4.12 million angling events per year using live bait North American Recreational Live Baitfish Use and Transport Jurisdictional Scan Summary •only southern US states allow unrestricted use of live bait •most jurisdictions in Great Lakes basin have controls •many Canadian jurisdictions have banned live bait use Live baitfish use prohibited Prohibited with regional exceptions Import prohibited and may not be transported between waterbodies May not be transported between waterbodies Import prohibited (VHSv non-susceptible fish species may be exempt) Live baitfish use allowed (May include species and/or waterbody specific restrictions) 3 Jurisdiction has exceptions to the general restrictions that apply (South Dakota and Tennessee) Review of Bait Use and Management • • • 4 announced Dec 2011, at same time as implementation of Lake Simcoe Management Zone (LSMZ) LSMZ (and management actions associated with it) is an interim approach to slow the spread of VHS and invasive species the MNR will be consulting with key stakeholders and the public on longer-term strategies to maintain a healthy fishery and an economically and ecologically viable bait industry Risk of AIS Spread: Movement of Live Bait AIS in bait is essentially a by-catch issue may be spread through: • • • • • • illegal dumping of bait buckets accidental release escape from in-water live holding boxes ‘fellow travellers’ – – – transport water on equipment on or in fish use of live bait suspected in numerous range expansions and/or introductions • 5 What has been done to mitigate risk re AIS? • use of regulatory and awareness approaches • Ontario Fishery Regulations, 2007 – – • partnership with Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters/OMNR – – 6 lists 48 fish species that may be used live as bait cannot release bait, baitfish or the contents of a bait bucket within 30 m of any waters promote public awareness, prevent spread of invasive species focus on pathways, track/monitor spread of AIS in Ontario HACCP Plans for Commercial Bait Operators (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) •(MNR)-approved HACCP plan is required before any commercial bait licence will be issued •due to complexity of operations, bait harvesters additionally must take mandatory training •HAACP plans set out best management practices to mitigate risk of spreading invasive species Year Harvesters Courses Harvesters Trained 2004 (Voluntary) 6 30 2006 6 122 2007 14 184 794 2008 16 + 3 180 As required 2009 15 247 As required 2010-11 9 32 As required 7 Dealers (selflearning) Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Plan Monitoring the Effectiveness of HACCP • • • 8 2009 - some preliminary assessment done in Lake Simcoe area, focused on tanks and holding cribs 23 inspections completed (3 major, 10 minor HACCP plan violations; 10 in full compliance) not a viable way of assessing how well best management practices and other mechanisms are working What about Dr. Drake’s work? • 2007-2008, sampled ‘angler’ purchases and retail tanks • • • Probability of occurrence & abundance of target and non-target fishes 48 stores in summer/fall and/or winter fishing seasons most purchases and tanks contained only target baitfishes • • 9 non-target fishes (including AIS & SAR) – low probability of occurrence and abundance even at low probability presents a risk when considering 4.12 million angling events/year using live bait What are we doing? • coat-tails approach – sample 30 retail stores • ‘angler’ purchases – 10 dozen minnows Primary Question – has frequency of occurrence, and relative abundance, of nontarget species in angler purchases changed since 2007/08? Objectives: • determine if non-target species are sold to anglers with commercial baitfish • compare frequency of occurrence in angler purchases between time periods • use of eDNA to detect species that are in or were in tanks • collect baseline data on: • • 10 aquatic invasive invertebrates/plants found in water purchased with commercial baitfish presence of Asian fish tapeworm (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi) in commercial baitfish Preliminary Results 11 Summer/Fall 2011 Sampling $120.00 700 $118 Cost of Bait Number of fish purchased >120 baitfish 600 $100.00 500 400 $60.00 $9 300 $40.00 200 $20.00 100 $0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 bait shop 12 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Number of fish Cost (Canadian) $80.00 Target vs Non-target Fish 2007/08 (from Drake, 2011) • • of 16,886 fishes purchased, 15 nontargets (0.089%) of 66 purchase events, 9 contained one or more non-targets (13.6%) 2011/12 (Current work) • of 14,970 fishes purchased, 34 nontargets (0.23%) – – • higher # of non-targets driven by one purchase with 22 non-targets (all Brook Silversides) of 521 fishes purchased without including this purchase event – Of 14,449 fishes purchased, 12 non-targets (probability = 0.083%) of 58 purchase events, 8 contained one or more non-targets (13.8%) 13 Non-Target Species Purchased 2007/08 2011/12 Rainbow Smelt (4) Brook Silverside (22) Banded Killifish (2) Common Carp (3) Rock Bass (2) Banded Killifish (2) Brook Silverside (1) Greenside Darter (2) Coho Salmon (1) Pumpkinseed (2) Gizzard Shad (1) Smallmouth Bass (2) Pumpkinseed (1) Black Bullhead (1) River Redhorse (1)* Round Goby (1) Smallmouth Bass (1) 14 * Species of Special Concern under ESA & SARA To compare…. Hornyhead chub Sample A Sample B Emerald shiner Abundance = 56 baitfishes Abundance = 521 baitfishes Number of species = 7 Number of species = 2 Number nontargets = 2 Number of nontargets = 22 Number of nontarget species = 2 Number of nontarget species = 1 White sucker Smallmouth bass Greenside darter 15 Brook silverside Images from: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Fellow Travellers (Summer/Fall 2011) 45 40 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Plant remains Algae Protozoans Rotifers Bryozoans Nematodes Oligochaetes Taxon group detected 35 30 percentage of stores percentage of stores 35 25 20 15 10 5 16 0 0 1 2 3 Number of taxon groups detected 4 5 Microcrustaceans Insects remains Conclusions • current results are consistent with Drake (2011) • Non-targets occur in very low abundances, with low purchase prevalence • most harvesters/retailers doing good job of selective fishing/sorting (i.e. 99.91% of individuals purchased are targets) • low-likelihood activities may contribute to species introductions due to 4.12 million live baitfish events per year • larger lakes near large angling populations most at-risk • high spread potential due to mobility of anglers 17 Acknowledgements • • • • • • 18 Jeff Brinsmead, David Copplestone, Donna Wales, Lauretta Dunford, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Matt Smith, Fraser Smith, Sophie Bull, Alison Kirkpatrick, Robert McGowan, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Andrew Drake, Nicholas Mandrak, Mike Parna, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Chris Jerde, University of Notre Dame Shelley Arnott, Queen’s University David Marcogliese, Environment Canada
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz