2009, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1242–1249
Advances in Psychological Science
*
…¿—ÀÁ˜XA"„ 130024$
!"#$%
&'()*+,-./0123/4156
789:;<=>:;<?@AB;$%CDEFGHIJKLAM
N%CKLOPD9:;<HQR%&STUD>:;<HVWXY(Z[\
]^_`a(b%?@c
AAdefgAhi?@
B842; B844
1 š›œ?@ghtDžŸ6 ¡
}~¢£¤¡i¥¦§L
C DE FG ¨© ds| 9: !" 4
!"#$%&'()Powell,
ª«-.CDEFG)Standardized
2005*+,-./01234
Test*y¬MS­®¯FGT9:&f^–
&!"456789:!"4
ª«°VWiy±|²³tLrsCD
-.
;< 3 =>?@AB#C
EFG´!<cdµ¶·¸e
D E F G & H I J K ) language sample
b!4F
G EVT-2)Expressive Vocabulary Test, Second
analysis/LSA*L
Edition * & EOWPVT (Expressive One-Word
Picture Vocabulary Test- Revised)#cd“|¹a.
?@AB)Parents Report*MNOP9:Q
R)OST?@*ABUVW9:
º ” ) define-the-word-I-say * t » ¼ F G
&XOYZ[\M]^_`a<b!4
CREVT-2
YZLcd?@ABe
(Comprehensive
Receptive
and
FG;<
Expressive Vocabulary Test-Second Edition)
MacArthur - Bates Communicative Development
!"4¹½JFGLCDEFG¾¿À²
Inventories (CDI)& Minnesota Child Development
³Á¨Ây.vw>xyÍFG
Inventory Expressive and Receptive Language
'`'(&4+Ä)ÅÆÇÈÉÊË*
Scale (MCDI)f CDI FGgh<ijkl
ÌÍ9:!"δ&š´x‘F
m)nopq2001*Lrs?@ABt!"
´!"4CDEFGe
4-u;vws>xy?@AB
w)µ¶·¸#Ï~ÐÑ#a.ºÉÒÓÏ~q*
tz{s?@|}~€‚ƒ„!"…
ÔÕÖ9:!"4Ÿ×L
°<
†‡ˆ‰<y.;Š4†‹Œ‡ˆŽ
H IJK §Ø M| 9:! "4 x‘?@ABt’“ds 0~3 ”•–—
ٍÚE#ٟ6#ÙÛÜ-.§ØLÝ
9:L+T 3 ”˜9:™i
HIJKM|9:¾«TF
´Þ=F´ßài9:
áâ…ã
2009-05-01
äå+Ä&æãäåçèéÚêëd|ì
* “
« T Ì Í ) Condouris, Meyer, & Tager-
!"#$”%NENU-SKD 2009002&
'
Flusberg, 2003*Lí8îæghïðiñ´
()*+,-./E-mail: [email protected]
1242
% 17 &% 6 '
p†‡ˆ‰Š!0‹ÈŒ
-1243-
HIJK§Ø±òóôLõMHI
eat something. Ask ratty what he wants.) ratty To
ö™§Ø#HIJK-.NC÷M
‰—qr*
HIJK§Øøù/dúgh<iûSŸ6
9:>What do you wanna eat ?
ÜüóôLghýþiŸñ9:
CHILDES) 9:Î*
Rat: Some cheese would be good.);pst
rat U‡u*
Þy]’Tóô
VWi=9:
)Freeplay*> cd
9:@
Î,iyy
AB#vwɪ«f)éG)Ex#y
æýþiCD
x*fŒL
˜O
Pf™ÎJK|HI
)Conversation*>|?M@n78'`
=NCª«²#éJKLî…|
òòs9:<¦hz|?{Óö™|
s9:!"4óô÷fM|
?t01>|óô
}9:=?~Æh
HIJK§Ø/d÷
!"#L$s!"
#'()é&€yí‚óô
m9:ìƒ
49:%™&&'()*
N„Æ…B†,‡æ6ˆy¦D'‰Š
ëd+,î9:!"4-.-
‹óô
ŒÆˆyŽAB9:Ñy
."/<0|78îæ/d°129
‘µ¶y’ݘóô
“ÑM¥y
:!"4-.§ØüüHIJK™&
’L
ª«3456rsjE&78|f
)Narration*>CDŒM”•y–—C
9U:óô/dVïy¦ý;L
D*рÌɘ‚CDÉ
ABÉé™
2 HIJKMOP<=
) Story Generation * É )ö=>?#
@AB#CDŒq*ö™HIdE
FGHIÓjJcdK.F´NC
|HIª«JKLLMNHIJKï
9:¹½¤¡#Ït§&d§q6
™&OPLÝHIQRñ‚
ÓIÁMÞ¦HIT9:SSûT
'
`UdVWiV-uNCf|
-.=d&|?§ûS<dWVWC
DEFGX]VW<uYYZLHI
JK§Ø)LSA*;Z[M‰<\
Ú4WM|9:Ý«TF´LXW
-.©/d]U]f'89
:-./d^_]`añbc
deà93fg'h/d LSA)Loeb,
Kinder, & Bookbinder, 2000*L
3 3.1 hzL<5=;CDŒt>||[.?
~•yCD‚23yš›˜•yCD
š›M‘µ¶#”•yœCDÉ
óô
•yCDL
3.2 ö =Œ 
!"#$
Dž . VÏ~ Ï €& Ï
t4lŸ M9:M¡Œy.π&
Ït4lÏ~LÁM[.Ït4l&Ï
€íCÏ~¢°£Ô,9:n;
pñ´êé9:¤¯y.CDŒÏ
~¥ä9:'¦§=ü9:]
ҟ!ðïfL±|Uj@s@A
B#|?&CDŒ
]4lEÏ
~ÙMrs9:Ý!"M°†‹
cdö™§ØLÁM@AB#|?&
CDŒXö™ïHIñ—#X¨Ï~
€„+ÏtЩ4úMªEy¦óô«
|Þ¦ö™
ª«°L
Wren)1985*|s 3 =
ö™ïH
)Elicited Production*>¾G
i
Iª«JK˜™ð¬HIЩ4,
=9:jï<=k¼Ï~)Ɖ<<=t4
|?ñsCDŒ#CDŒñs@ABLÁ
lÏ~*Á¾G
]m9:à^OS9
M@s Wren óôcdM­t}~
:nyo‰>LÆ>
[®9:HIÞ¦9:|?çèa<Ù
;p>The rat looks hungry. I bet he wants to
­¯+3ö=X|?çèa!ð
-1244-
2009 ïÙñ„HIЩ4L, Southwood &
KëTHIJKy=tghÓTÝF
Russell | 5 ”TS°9óô!±3 =ö™
É$\
/Þ-.X0yã
úTøùVWi²?@AB°C
J ) Munoz, Gillam, Pena, & Gulley-Faehnle,
DŒö™ï?ÎÙ|?ö™ïδ
2003*Lí8V-ußtàc5OP¶
5s‘
‚ÁM]^9:@AB&CD
á ⠊ 4 l ) macrostructure * & 㠊 4 l
ŒŒÏ~δ‰<ñª8y¦9
)microstructure*óô
ÚD«TL
:Œi²Ï~,<¦9:³Œi
4.1 %&'()
Ï~ÁML9:´
QU@ABö™
âŠ4lJK)high-point analysis*MLÙ
ï?δMCDŒ°>?&
\ä{å¶JK9:ÚDWOSæ*9
@ABö™ïPµÏ€Ù€CDŒ&|?
:CD{Ó&'4lЩ4)Justice, et al.,
°@ABö™ït4lÙЩ
2006*LLabov)1972*™&iy=JKtçç
)Southwood & Russell, 2004*L3UQ
!"èé4)expressive elaboration*JKê
ö™´¶CDŒ·s@AB&|?
TyÒ´e
ÚD< 6 ãJ>ƒëì
ö™Ð©4¶@AB]ÆCDŒ
)opening appendage*'í56)orientation*
&|?L@sóôXUdóô¢)|?
Ð © « é ) complicating action * - u
&CD;~*#©p¸Ú#;pq+Ä]^
)evaluation*}~î)resolution*4ïëì
X]^¾GNï4õÂñ78L
)closing appendage*LÞ 6 ŽÐ©«é
Á]¹fNï4ºÆ]^ö™
I»
&}~î©êTMÚDðñò­‚™
‰<\Ú
&Dè"¢\ó\ó˜¬M'`}~
ú­¼½L@AB
4Á°¾¿RP¨]‹ÀÁ|?
¿RP†‹ÀÁÁ†‹3¢;p[ÂÌ
͐CDŒMy=°VHIö™
L¾G¢DF¢¾GÃëú°À
‹«†‹ÀÁ&Ãë |s÷ÄÅÆeÇ
$ÈÉÊ°9Uj<¾™Éµ¶ËÌCD
Œtö™ïHIš´Ù\)Ï~Ù
€ÙЩ*ÁM@s3°9GˆwÁ
]VWPµ¶Pµ¶ÍÎi9
:|µ¶GˆÏºL,ÌÍ|µ¶YZ!
"ÐÑVWµ¶ÒU}~¬Mö
™ïUÏ~δP"]¢HIJKX
Ï~δCDLƺÓ
=
4Ô
UÕ9:@)éÖH^)é
my.?~ÞHy.„¶×Ø]
^ö™
/[4ÔWÙZ[MNÙä
%HIL
4 O P¶ Ñt ö= ï 9: H I M
Ú D Û c d Ú D J K ) narrative
analysis*t|HIª«JKLÚDJK
My<Ï#\Ü(4JKå‰
)Thompson, Craig, & Washington, 2004*LÚDJ
îL
| ëì>WB†ô
CD«iÉ4õi
01 5 ~kL
ö. 56)introducer*>CD÷àøô
CDáÓ«)Æ>yùúû<yü*
ý. þ)abstract*>ÚD8|CD1
)Æ>ÞMòsVê±CD*É
CDC~)Æ>yù*
. ;~)theme*:ÚD…|CD1)Æ>
Þ¬MÞyù–+*
. 4ï)coda*>CD|ÚÑ
É;Œ
ëdÉà)Æ>ÙLùD'¢]
Æ¡³¬¢*
. 4õ)ender*>yÚD4õT
C)Æ>4õi/<i*L
‚ 'í56)orientation*>TÚDì'`
-uM™#[&‚æYZ
01 3 ~kL
ö. ¸J>m™¸)Æ>—#±±#
—#—q*
ý. ™ò>òÉ.º
!
¹)Æ>""##$#q%#(€#&q*
. 4[[>™4[[)Æ>«é
'#*L
% 17 &% 6 '
p†‡ˆ‰Š!0‹ÈŒ
Š -u)evaluation*>ÑMÚÑ
("
Š[t01 5 ~kL
-1245-
ZëTJJz,JJÏ~!"MyÒ´
Š[*& C-unit)]ŸËÏ~[\ªE
ö. <øºk)>;Me†¹&*¹
Ï~t4lª«JW*
)Loban, 1976*
Á]01+ƅy¦‰#…f‰#
…,y‰…ñ‰
æHI¿R_`)]XÉMh*#®n
q-uøºk)L<øºk)01
)M?@ÉMóô^*#)ék¼#¾G¢
…‰#…-.‰qL
q ¨ Ì Í MLU J K 4 º ) Wagner,
ý. k/4!">k)¹{Ô)ÉÙ
e†¹*j'É0dtÅƅ1!”
Nettelbladt, Sahlen, & Nilholm, 2000*L
Johnston | MLU ª « i _ ª V ï i
MLU2L MLU 8Ó¹Ï~#­
2‰#…#S34‰
. *Ð>àcy¸¹#e†¹Éé¹)Æ>
¯Ï~#*ÐÕ/Ï~`aOPba'¦
y5}678˜69:9:ûSûS
Ü(4Ï~VWiىb!49:
ÔP*L
HIc|9:!ð·dÉ\dLÞ
. …ã¸Ú>ÕÖøµ&$%)Æ>î.#
= t ¥ ä 3%~49% MLU Y ) Jones,
êT*é&Õ/)Æ>;<#=%#>*#
2007*L
»
¸Ú)Æ>?@#A?é*¹
+,-,-56783lexical complexity4
. |?>™|?B<Å2|?CDE
T|?L
|]^¹Î´)number of different word
efg*
4.2 *&'()
| ¹½ Щ4 Å 2 F´ t¬ M 㠊4 lJK ŸË M ÚD …ã 4
HI]^¹Î´)NDW*WM|X<]^
lÆF2#¸¹¹{&LÏqLJKN
)Æ
¹xÎ)DeThome & Channell, 2007*
C01¹½G6#Ï~G6#tG6qL
jump & jumped Gë±^¹child & children
+,-,. / 0 1 2 3 Mean Length of Utterance/
¬M]^¹*LNDW 3¢HIñ—ÌÍ
MLU4
¨&PµÏ€)MLU*hªLB<759:
Brown)1973*Vïiy´E™&
HI¨<±^δ¹NDW ñ—
tççPµÏ€)MLU*Brown êT MLU
Cb!iÞ9:¤¡¹½Ð©„L7H
M-.t™&yZHNC+Tb
IMy.‚wÁçèa¿RiTNW tá⌍Iò­ MLU ¥€)Brown,
ñ—¬&M¡j><ò±/NDW 1973*LBrown MLU YJJit™&
j>n¡&¹½§±klL
5 ÉÊL 1973 •UMLU ëTSd
HIJKNC12/dsøù&óô
2000 •cdeàHIJK MLU /d
KT 91%)Loeb, et al., 2000*L
‚m¹½ªE°Å)TypenToken RatioTTR*m
TTR pµ×Ø NDW y¦…/ÞWd
NDW)]^¹Î´*a TNW)¹3Î*
MNy°ÅLy¹½3ÎT 100 HI
MLU /d<y.•–“d^_!Ló
TTR=0.01 !à 1 ¹©*Ði 100 oTTR=1
ôMNO‹s MLU “d•–¶wT 3 ”P
!àHI 100 ¹úM]^LypO
QP 3 ” MLU F´4ºÓïðùRSÏ/L
HI TTR 0.01~1.00 ‚y.^_…
òs/d MLU NCHITñ—}~
<…†¹)content word*&q¹)function
Brown)1973*–«HIñ—T 100 Ï~
word * 0 * Ð ) Silvermana & Ratnerb,
Loeb)2000*ABj 43%g'hcd
2002*Ly¬cd 0.50 ëTrr0.50 UV TTR
Ï~Îs 50 LÁMHIñ—Å2Ì
YÕ֓7ªEes·s 0.50 êTM/
Í­JK4ºY„HI]—Y„]·X
tªE4Lõ¶NDW © TNW a˜c—i
HIñ—/ž. 100 UV·]s 50
HIñ—ÌÍÁuŒiyb£ÔLy
LMLU 4º3Ï~JWtÌÍÂ
¦q¹HIM©xv*ÐUdL+
5=Ï~JW
HI]ñFï TTR Y¬]—Lr
P-unit)XcªE#Y
-1246-
sHIñ—óôVWiy¦cÞyªE
2009 ´E-dŽÝ DDS g< 20 •zÁ
tÆÓq¹&…†¹JF´#UdC
yÅú©êTMMN9:t™&YZ
Dδ¹3ÎLm
<ÏYå‰LDSS 015ãJ
ÁÞ¦t]wxøLJF´q
¹&…†¹Œ5}~>|yHIUj
Developmental
Sentence
Types
(DST)
&
Developmental Sentence Scoring (DSS)LDST ds
TTR <5]^Y,|syÑMq¹
|HIÏ~ª«JkKïЦ]Ò´Ï
&…†¹÷ÂzõLUdyCDE¹3
~Æ>]ҟ;4l#¹ÉM5¹
ÎM{|HIñ—}~VßtÁóô
‘Ô#+¹eÓ]Ò´4lLDSS d
ÔHIñ—¶"Óyü+ }}~ Y]^
sJK01;&é¹Ò´Ï~HILDSS óôøº¨]^LTiîÞ¦}~
™&’JJi 8 =t4l01¸¹k
RichardsMalvern & McKee VïybF´
)É].b¹#“b¹#;é¹#üé¹#
¹½H4t3 D ®Î§Ø)Ud VOCD
¡.#F¹#‹}Ï8ì#‹}ÏLЩt
€dè D*)McKee, Malvern, & Richards,
Ží°tŽí”JÙ\HIX
2000*Lm
<Ï~Þ 8 k¶3JaHIÏ~3ÎáT
Š D ®Î§Ø
DSS JÎDSS JÎ]\b!­ÙЩ
D ®Î§ØMrs TTR MN¥ñH
e
Lóô™ð DSS JÎò­•–¥€,¥
IªE‚rULWUdyÎ'­¼
€)Redd, 2006*LDSS ]’“dsTS™& 2
Už.y¾F‚r&õ‚rTƒÔ[
”#0~6 ”#11 ”9:,ds-df
@MNy®Î DD JάÓTH
[®•
t™&Ɩ—9:#]^˜
I¹½ª84yNCLD Y]ñ!±¹
¦9:ñ•–9:)9 ”9:*q)Seal, 2001;
½ªE4]ñ)Owen & Leonard, 2002*L
Hasting, 2008*L
+,-,98:;<=3The Index of Productive
Syntax /IPSyn4
Ž Ý/ d¶Ñ NC ª« H IJ K MN9:™&YZÁMHIJ
IPSyn)Scarborough, 1990*M9:™&
Køù/d¨Â­y.£Ô&}~Lx
y=-.tWTtЩ„VWiy
yR¾ñ´‚01Ó9:
JÎL3 ”a9:/d MLU n IPSyn "
EəHTjJ񴁂+|
¢^HVϺ3 ”¶ MLU ïðùRSÏ
NCª«åÙMš¾‚x‘
/, IPSyn „…AB9:t4l™&
óô
‰Fy.€§ÉM23€›œ
Xøù-.&¾Góô|9:tª«
žŸjJ&NCJKMHI óôIPSyn 3¢ipo†‡L
¾¡ŠÕ֐xÂ-J
‚yü4
IPSyn 01 56 =‰
4l)Æ;#
Y„}~Lx|9:E&™H
k)#é¹#¡.¹#8ìˆ#鹘‰#
TjJP¢£9:>?P
qq*JJT 4 k>¸¹Š 11 #
y¦ûYZ°Æc#!'#?
é¹].
鹊 16 #‹}&¡. 10 #Ï~4l 19
YZ#F¤qÞ¦YZ|Ÿ 9:‰
9: 100 Ï~ŒykíJÎ)
_`a!"M<uYÁåH
tT>ƺ<y4lyü¨<ïðG 0
©¥y¦iL
JÆºBïðyüG 1 JÆºïð5ü
TiîÞ¦}~78îægh™ïi
¶G 2 J*˜ kíJÎäy
éHIJKèýþirs
T IPSyn 3J)Äs 0~112 J‚*L
]^#jE#=§•
HIÎL
+,-,+>1?@3Developmental Sentence
CHILDES ) 9 : Î *
Scoring4
)MacWhinney, 1996; Evans & Miller, 1999*M¨
DSS)Lee & Canter, 1971*ëTyCDE
©¶ñ9:M@ MacWhinney
t|9:Ýt/dª«
& Snow 1984 •«ªýCHILDES ;
% 17 &% 6 '
p†‡ˆ‰Š!0‹ÈŒ
01 3 ´ÔÓJ>xyãJM9:Î
-1247-
 H I é J K Û ž J Î " ¢ 96.4%~
The databaseÎ01«#1¬?#
96.8%Þ!±éJKè|s9:™&
:pO?q 20 =… 60 ó
øùJKMy<uYå‰)Redd, 2006*L
ôŽíXMNLÎ]’01TS9
:Î,÷<Us­®
#x
‘'
#úL¯
+Ó£°
ÎLóô
Å2¼d CHILDES VWª«óô,]0±š¾‚
¿RHIL,óô
¨ óôQ
RbHI¿²¢ÎL,³´Î
ÎLx‘ãJM CHAT OPìyCDµ¶&j
èCDEDE
G©prIYZ&
?…†CG>?=[ÂÆ?jIk¼#
™EYZ#ÏtYZ#*Ð#`#ŽqL
CHILDES ŸãHIT CHAT LxãJMÎJK‰
CLAN (Child Language Analysis)LCLAN ËÌ
a 4 ñ6JK>EJK#¹½J
K#ÏtJK#Û·JKLJKy¦
HIãŠNCÆ>PµÏ€ MLU#™&
Ï~-JNC DSS#¹UdxK FREQ#
¹½ªE°K TTR qLCHILDES ïð]’
îiHIJKy¦ð¾£`,¸ªi
óôYZóô
úM¹þ¿
R&UdYZ,OP CHILDES Î
¾ðº»6¼ª«]^ó
ô‚ΰLí8g< 1300 ™!
óôUdi,½+-.¾J12
01­®#£°#x‘'#ÚD4
l#õ#Ó#¿™&qL
) 9:Î*æ
a CHILDES
îæ÷<y¦f€›HIJKèÆ
SALT#CP#SSD qrsé| MLU#
DSS#IPSYN qNCª«LÞ¦éJK
è‰<±7V۞4&‚ÏK)Long, 2001;
Long & Channell, 2001*LfCP (computerized
5 î …| :9 : H IJK ó ôñ ¶JT6>
xy6ML'y
|9:¹½#t
N¸íóôLóô…†01|9:YZ
¹½™&)ƹ½´™&#¹½ºq
™&*#Ït4l™&)Ưˆ4l#;
4l*#Ï
™&)Æ JÏ#mJÏ#©
JÏq*qª«JKŸ 9:!"4
Þ¦4l&q]^•–ÉÊMN'í
+ò•–¥€™&OÃ)ÄîÅ1997Ä
îÅÆÇÈ2001*LÉʱ)2004*èÜ
34iî…òs9:™&óô'í01
¹½-.¹½´™&#Udk¹¹´
&¹x'í#+‰
=k¼¹½™&
)Ƹ¹#é¹#e†¹#´¹#b¹q*
tG6¶9:Ï4l&ÐÏ4l•–
ÉÊe
&3™&OÃLÞyóôy
‹sMòæ=te
ÙË
&4l]^L
MNn¡&™&ª„,û%F´'y
Xò
æ[.•–ÉÊ9:!"46
!ðOPL
x ‘ 6ML % F´ 'y
& ò s
:9:PµÏ€™&'íóô)̪
,1981nopq2004ÍÎÏÐÑ«Ò
ÎÑ2001*Þ¦óô|:9:ìÏ~
ÓJt&J
ª«i<ÔÕÖLÁM
’’z× MLU ´ªE]ҟØÙï9:
™&Щ„)fM•–ñ9:*
9UóôªyÚa&™ï½+]^
G6-dNCL
x 6M! •U L d'y
& ò
s9:dNóôLÄÛ;Ì:9:
profiling)M°SdéJKèW
d™&óôŽíÜÝbÞ)2003*&ßL
MLU#DSS#IPYSN qNC)Long, Fey, &
Þ)2003*OPö™
MNzî
Channell, 2006*Lí8|s]^•
HI
àOd CHAT H9:jèU
éJK۞4ª«iy‘óô)Long &
d CLAN è MLU, s«T
Channell, 2001; Channell, 2003; Redd, 2006;
DE)INCA-A*Ÿ i9:d™&L
Hasting, 2008*g<óô™ð|«HI&ÀÁ
Þ¦óô|s:9:H
&JK
-1248-
è/dq}~ª«i<ÔÕÖL
6 !"#
í8îægh|HIJK§Ø3iñ
´óôÁ.iy‘-dNC,gh
™ïi±/èª«Áî…
6óô÷áL$s!"4|'–
89:[®øº<0îæð<óôr
â¶4Ô:[[™ï“sî9:
HIJKNCL,MNÙ ¾ÚE9
:!"4™&YZL
H IJK I ãE P 3¢ wÁL+T®Ÿ$ÀHIJKF
´NCiaijE78jJ
]^
MHIJKPÂñ£ÔL®Ÿ
ð<óô:9:HIJK¨Lâ
Š&ãŠ56ª«LâŠ4lJKML\
{å4l¶|HI´
¡]½+‰
4l$„°ñLÁMõ
M|CD{Ó&'4lЩ4JK÷M|
fÚDäÄJK;Š4ú°ñÃë
U°£ÔL-JiÁ.°å.CDCžŸMN\-J
yü4Y
„L$îæÚDJKâŠ4lNC^
L»jE&ï“Ô:9
:ÚD!"âŠ4lNCL
ãŠ4lJKM|‰
4lJK
¬½+¢78}~XKæi
3y¦_ªLMLU#NDW#TTR °
ƒ/d4à,î…|
s9: MLU 'í¨ª«iy¦óôŸ±
i¹½JKG6$îæ§Ø«4LÝ,
tG6|îæg<§ØNC$Ây.
£ÔÅÆ IPSyn#DSS JÎMrs«
tç³:Ïtç³]^sèÜ
«LL¹eÚªEUj«eÚ
ªE,::¹Ud¶<
ñé)4<êé¹&e†¹Å2ëT
;&ˆ,]¹eÚ±/ªE:
…<kóôÙ<±ò§ØLX|
IPSyn#DSS q$:tç³*
bJJt4l‰
:Ÿ ¥¦t4l÷óô
Ùñ´ì²óô
ÙU%'#'&í'q'
íhëL
ABCD
…1. (2004). . Ž~¿—R
de.
‘€’, “ª, ²”, Ž•–, ¸—˜, 9™, Tardif, T.,
Fletcher, P. (2001). ~"š'‡ˆ›Ëœ 
žËŸd! >¡¢. , 9(5), 295£
297.
‘€’, “ª, ²”, ¸—˜, Tardif, T., Fletcher, P. (2004).
¤pš'¥´W¥¦ §"¨(). ,
12(3), 206£208.
‚„–A“aA©„“. (2001). ª¥"«œ¬­p†‡
ˆ®¯!°O0‹. , 5(8),42£49.
±²ä/. (2003). . ³)S*". –ÿ—.
Ž´. (1981). ¤pµ¶ˆ‡!·(). ,
(5), 33£37.
[žc. (1997). !"#$%&. ¸¹º—
Rde.
[žcA²0. (2001). '%&(#$
). ÂÝÂLj"¢—Rde.
»/. (2003). *+,-.(%&. ³
)S*". –ÿ—.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. (p.53).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Channell, R. W. (2003). Automated developmental sentence
scoring using computerized profiling software. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 369–375.
Condouris, K., Meyer, E., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The
relationship between standardized measures of language
and measures of spontaneous speech in Children with
Autism. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 12(3), 349–358.
DeThome, L. S., & Channell, R. W. (2007).Clinician-Child
interactions: Adjustments in linguistic complexity.
American Journal of Speech - Language Pathology, 16, 2;
ProQuest Education Journals, p. 119.
Evains, J. L., & Miller, J. (1999). Language sample analysis
in the 21 st century. Seminars in Speech and Language, 20,
101–116.
Hasting, A. M., (2008). Accuracy of automated grammatical
analysis of language samples from persons with deafness
d¸¹k)¸¹LIPSyn#DSS ‘ï
or hearing impairment. Unpublished
t4l:M]ÂÆ鹘
Brigham Young University.
‰#é¹].
q+,ãŠNCIãEÂ
­ñ£ÔLæ@sNC¨ûS
vëîæ™i€›è|fª«î
2009 Master
thesis.
Jones, E. L. (2007). The clinical utility of MLU and IPSYN
for AAE–speaking children. Unpublished Master thesis.
Louisiana State University.
Justice, L. M., Bowles, R. P., Kaderavek, J. N., Ukrainetz, T.
% 17 &% 6 '
p†‡ˆ‰Š!0‹ÈŒ
A., Eisenberg, S. L., & Gillam., R. B. (2006). The index of
narrative microstructure: A clinical tool for analyzing
school-age Children’s narrative performances. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 177–191.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lee, L. L., & Canter, S. M. (1971). Developmental Sentence
Scoring: A clinical procedure for estimating syntactic
development in children’s spontaneous speech. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36, 315–340.
Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten
through grade twelve. Urbana,IL: National Council of
Teachers of English.
Loeb, D. F., Kinder, K., & Bookbinder, L. (2000, November).
Current language sampling practices in preschools. Poster
presented at the Annual Convention of the American
Speech-Language Hearing Association, Washington, D.C.
Long, S. H. (2001). About time: A comparison of computerized
and manual procedures for grammatical and phonological
analysis. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15,399-426.
Long, S. H., & Channell, R. W. (2001). Accuracy of four
language analysis procedures performed automatically.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,
10,180-188.
Long, S. H., Fey, M. E., & Channell, R. W. (2006).
Computerized Profiling (CP; Version9.7.0) [Computer
software]. Milwaukee, WI: Department of Speech
Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University. Retrieved
September 17, 2007, from
www.computerizedprofiling.org.
MacWhinney,B. (1996). The CHILDES System. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 5–14.
McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Measuring
vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary
and Linguistic Computing, 15, 323–337.
Munoz, M. L., Gillam, R. B., Pena, E. B., & Gulley-Faehnle,
A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional
-1249-
narratives of Latino children. Language. Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 332–342.
Owen, A. J., & Leonard, L. B. (2002). Lexical diversity in
the spontaneous speech of Children With specific language
impairment; Application of D. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 927–937.
Powell, T. Ph.D. (2005). A brief overview of language and
approaches to its assessment: One professional's
perspective.
Retrieved
February
24,2005,
from
www.apraxia-kids.org.
Redd, N. (2006). Automated grammatical tagging of
language samples from Spanish-speaking children
learning English. Unpublished Master thesis. Brigham
Young University.
Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Index of Productive Syntax.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 11,1–22.
Seal, A. (2001). Scoring Sentences Developmentally: An
analog of developmental sentence scoring. Unpublished
Master thesis. Brigham Young University.
Silvermana, S., Ratnerb, N. B. (2002). Measuring lexical
diversity in children who stutter: application of vocd.
Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27, 289–304.
Southwood, F., & Russell, A. F. (2004). Comparison of
conversation, freeplay, and story generation as methods of
language sample elicitation. Journal of Speech, Language,
and Hearing Research,47, 366–376.
Thompson, C. A., Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A.
(2004).Variable production of African American English
across oracyand literacy contexts. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 269–282.
Wagner, C. R., Nettelbladt, U., Sahlen, B., & Nilholm, C.
(2000). Conversation versus narration in pre-school
children with language impairment. International Journal
of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 83–93.
Wren, C. T. (1985). Collecting language samples from
children with syntax problems. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 83–102.
Review of Foreign Studies on Children Language Sample Analysis
GAI Xiao-Song;
YANG Wei;
TAI Yu
(Department of Psychology,Colledge of Educational Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)
Abstract: Language sample analysis (LSA) is a wide-used and effective method to assess the development
of expressive language ability of children, this paper introduces and summarizes the development of LSA
abroad, including the basic procedure of LSA; the eliciting method and measuring indices of language
sample. Besides, also refers to some domestic effort related with LSA. Further study in chinese could take
advandage of macro-analysis techniques in foreign researches, but should product the indicators of
micro-analysis for Chinese children based on the characteristic of Chinese.
Key words: expressive language ability; language sample analysis; mean length of utterance; index of
productive syntax