June 18, 2007
IN THE LEAD
By CAROL HYMOWITZ
Personal Boundaries
Shrink as Companies
Punish Bad Behavior
June 18, 2007; Page B1
As with politicians, today's ambitious business managers need to be
aware that their personal behavior will be as closely scrutinized and
judged as their work performance.
DOW JONES REPRINTS
This copy is for your personal,
non-commercial use only. To order
presentation-ready copies for
distribution to your colleagues, clients or
customers, use the Order Reprints tool
at the bottom of any article or visit:
www.djreprints.com.
• See a sample reprint in PDF format.
• Order a reprint of this article now.
Corporate directors are far less willing than they were a few years ago to look the other way if an
executive does something that threatens to embarrass a company. This is the case even if the
executive is a star performer. It's also true even if the action had nothing to do directly with work
and isn't tied to illegal behavior, such as sexual harassment or "creating a hostile work environment."
The offense could be getting drunk or acting lewd at parties or having tangled or abusive love
relationships.
Time Warner asked Chris Albrecht, CEO of its Home Box Office unit and a star at the company, to
resign last month after he was accused of assaulting his girlfriend in a hotel parking lot in Las
Vegas. Directors at WellPoint, the nation's largest health insurer, fired chief financial officer David
Colby for violating the company's code of conduct. The company won't elaborate but, according to
several women, Mr. Colby was conducting numerous affairs that were becoming public and
embarrassing. And in April, Starwood Hotel and Resort's board ousted CEO Steven Heyer after
receiving an anonymous letter accusing him of making sexual advances to female employees. An
independent investigation reportedly uncovered emails substantiating the claims. Mr. Heyer has
denied the allegations.
"It used to be that as long as an executive performed
well on the job, no one cared much about what they
• Is it right, or fair, to fire an employee over
were doing in their free time -- or even behind closed
embarrassing behavior? Share your
doors in the office," says Doug Schwarz, an attorney at
thoughts2 with Carol Hymowitz.
Bingham, McCutchen in New York. "But a sea change
has occurred, with every aspect of managers' conduct
being scrutinized -- and ever more closely the higher up one goes."
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
1
One reason for the change is the increasingly blurred line between work and home. With everyone
carrying BlackBerrys and responding to customers and colleagues 24/7, there is no such thing as
completely personal or off-work time. In addition, misbehaving managers often leave a trail of
incriminating email and text messages -- forgetting the cellphones and wireless devices they are
using are their employers' property.
The increased scrutiny of executives' conduct also reflects heightened governance in general, and a
greater willingness on the part of employees to blow the whistle. Some who see executives behaving
in ways that could hurt their company's reputation are speaking out more -- helped by employer hot
lines established after the accounting scandals of prior years.
And even if the employees don't alert superiors, many are publicizing executive misbehavior on
Internet chat sites. They can say whatever they want, without having to disclose their names. Dozens
of people posted anonymous comments on the Web about Mr. Colby, the ousted WellPoint
executive, and his affairs.
Given all this, it's not surprising that more companies are explicit when they dismiss an executive for
indiscretions. Relatively few are willing to explain away an executive's ouster for bad behavior as
leaving for "personal reasons."
Kaiser Aluminum, in a press release in January 2006, said that Kerry A. Shiba had resigned as CFO
because of "a personal relationship with another employee, which the company determined to be
inappropriate." Kaiser also described Mr. Shiba as a talented financial executive and asserted that his
resignation "in no way related to the company's internal controls... or financial performance."
Similarly, Boeing's board in 2005 ousted former president and CEO Harry Stonecipher because he
was romantically involved with an employee, who didn't report to him.
The company said it wasn't concerned that he had an extramarital affair, but that he had put Boeing
in a potentially embarrassing situation. Mr. Stonecipher later agreed that he had "used poor
judgment" and had "violated my own standards."
Companies aren't in the business of dictating employees' morality, but they expect a certain decorum.
One female executive at a large financial-services company says she moves quickly to confront -and at times dismiss -- employees "engaged in indiscretions that are clearly in their control,"
including consensual affairs with other employees. "I call it the H-R moment," she says, "when you
look someone in the eye and say, 'This isn't all right.' "
Companies that confront employees at the first hint of misbehavior, however, often are willing to
give a manager a second chance -- especially if he or she agrees to correct the mistake and get
counseling. "If I hear someone got drunk at a party with clients, I confront them about that. But if
the drinking problem isn't severe, I can also tell them to get help if they want to keep their job," says
the financial-services executive.
But managers with a reputation for sexual indiscretions and hard living will have trouble landing a
job. Pat Cook, who runs an executive-search firm based in Bonxville, N.Y., says the code of
behavior is strict. "If you sense when doing reference checks even a whiff of impropriety with a
particular candidate, that glows nuclear and you move right on."
Email me at [email protected]. For a discussion on today's column, go to WSJ.com/Forums4.
To see past columns, go to CareerJournal.com5.
•
URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118212112702038438.html
Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) http://forums.wsj.com/viewtopic.php?t=562
(2) http://forums.wsj.com/viewtopic.php?t=562
(3) mailto:[email protected]
(4) http://WSJ.com/Forums
(5) http://CareerJournal.com
Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our
Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints
at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.