The Iowa Review Volume 22 Issue 1 Winter Article 29 1992 A Form of One's Own: Virginia Woolf 's Art of the Portrait Essay Jocelyn Bartkevicius Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.uiowa.edu/iowareview Part of the Creative Writing Commons Recommended Citation Bartkevicius, Jocelyn. "A Form of One's Own: Virginia Woolf 's Art of the Portrait Essay." The Iowa Review 22.1 (1992): 123-134. Web. Available at: http://ir.uiowa.edu/iowareview/vol22/iss1/29 This Contents is brought to you for free and open access by Iowa Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Iowa Review by an authorized administrator of Iowa Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Form of One's Own: Virginia Woolf 'sArt of the Portrait Essay -JocelynBartkevicius READ PRIMARILY for herwork as awriter and critic of fiction, Virginia Woolf years also a life-long was essayist and critic of the essay. In 1903 ?twelve a novel ?she career as an began her essayist, publishing a collection of and editing, carefully binding literary essays about In and other liter 1904, her essays?portraits places, and events.1 before writing, people, as well ary essays as cultural and literary criticism?began to be continue published appearing in her periodicals, where they would throughout life. In 1905, she wrote, "The peculiar form of the essay implies a peculiar substance; you can say in this shape what you cannot with equal fitness say in any other."2 two essay sketches, The following here for the first time, published 's continuing her reflect Woolf last decade, to the essay attention, through as a is from a Memories," literary form.3 The first sketch, "Incongruous that includes sketches for several literary essays and June 1930 notebook portraits, among them, "Evening Over Sussex," and portraits of Christina wrote it five years after Rossetti and George Eliot. Woolf The publishing as Common Reader (a collection concerned the with essay similarly imagi two years after Orlando native literature), work aspects of combining (a and one year after A Room of One's Own. Two and fiction), portraiture years later she published The Common Reader, Second Series and began The In 1938, she she called, in her diaries, "an essay novel." Pargiters, which published Three Guineas. impressions," but most "Roger or 1936 Fry") did not Woolf date it between likely wrote (when she began reading a series of "Roger Fry: 1935 she delivered (when for her book-length biog raphy of Fry) and 1940 (when she published that biography). During this from 1928 to 1941, she wrote essays and sketches, "On them "The and the Fish," "Gas," 111," "Leslie among Being on six and "Walter Sickert" London, essays (an essay that, like Stephen," the Fry sketch, explores links between talk and portraiture, and between period, many other Sun the observed These and the imagined). two sketches discuss and demonstrate essay, especially the portrait essay, as she entered Woolf 's aesthetic of the the last decade of her life. 123 University of Iowa is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to The Iowa Review ® www.jstor.org The essay, pretended "accuracy"; is not here, exposition, observer. For objective truth requires amerging iswhere the remembered, portraiture these sketches, Woolf its peculiar Editor's Note on of observation seen, heard, and imagination. And and interpreted join. In the portrait essay's fluidity the truth of a life. celebrates to capture ability article, or debate, and the essayist no writes truth, Woolf here, differs from and explores the Text: In editing these manuscripts, my goal has been to provide both a legible, revised sketch, and a sense of how Woolf about and worked thought of the To preserve each of her dele portrait essay. through her aesthetic tions would to follow, the texts very difficult for there are many a sentence. in several deletions Thus, where single make crossouts ?sometimes or a to a new loca single word crossed out, phrase moved tion in the sentence?I have honored Woolf 's revision without noting the in I 's revised the of list deletions. offer Woolf change only (For example, seem minor ?a from "One day at some fair he saw a tele at some sale he found a are almost a scope" day telescope." There I have corrected obvious In addition, dozen such deletions.) mispellings, intact left but Woolf's characteristic such as peculiar punc idiosyncracies, use of and inconsistent tuation, use of ampersands, apostrophes. Where sentence where she switched to "One Woolf has deleted a longer passage, about portraiture, ner of thinking sages in the section tions.) Bracketed and where I preserve the changes reflect her man the deleted words and pas are such dele twenty-four (There in the the text mark their location labelled "Deletions." numbers within to numbers in the Deletions section. Brackets and correspond manuscript to 's hand has been especially difficult also enclose words where Woolf to indicate editorial judgment. For example, in "Incon here are rich in implication. a shift from as a gruous Memories," they indicate thinking of "inaccuracy" or as some sort of accident, or as something that doesn't really matter, a reader can never find out about, to a sense of as a kind of thing inaccuracy decipher, Woolf artistic 's revisions statement ?a also emphasize use imagination among 124 a kind result of the words of collaboration to discover literary forms, "truth." autobiography that are available. between writer The changes and reader?both the revision that suggests Finally, to be suited the of kind may peculiarly as important, to "lesser" writers aswell (it is available in Revisions the sketch the also celebrate role of "august" ones). Fry the imagination and collaboration and sub (in this case, between writer was weaves in each sketch, Woolf her goal for The Pargiters, ject). As a passage focused on her aesthetic of the essay a together portrait with a a demonstration ofthat aesthetic, passage that makes portrait. "truth" she describes as to Text Quentin (excluding introduction and editorial notes) copyright 1992 by Bell and Angelica Bell and theHenry W. Public Library, Astor, Garnett. Reprinted by permission of Quentin and Albert A. Berg Collection, The New York Lenox and Tilden Foundations. 125 (CiurW /??H/* ?L-^^X Wt %Jri ?'h*^ ^ ?U iU Vtv^iJ* * "^ 126 *?^ ^?~ ^ <b-fc *<** '^ ^~ fc<*?7 " Cirx+styt?** ^^ L La - (?nZfy 4L. cujLw u^^^ //*y /^ K4 ?dJ^^ *>^ ***** ^ *" Incongruous Memories2 The other day one of our well known writers was curacy in his account of the death bed behaviour taken to task for [1] inac of a celebrated man. [2] or that. not matter, His excuse was? this for does the purpose of [3] [4]It remarks is to protest that inaccuracy is very often a superior the following form of truth. [5] Those who read, whether poetry, fiction or biography, know that some words or scenes have a peculiar power to go on living, & in the mind long after the context has been forgotten. possibly growing [6] the authors would the And it may be held?possibly idea ?that support of some scene are [7] not travesties, these expansions & transformations [8] is only the & that the life which the scene puts on in the readers mind a natural process, proper unfurling & expansion, [9] [proved] by words a some reason for with when are, meaning. highly charged Clearly, they stir up others, about in the mind, live scene will split, knock [alter] a so & memories form further group which may [10] perhaps, associations, the original. Yet, were the be hardly recognisable when compared with one the effect that his words had, author there, & could present him with he might be the first towelcome the bastard& to say that though he had all this out, this was what he meant ?all this was implicit. a great power of this sort; of has course; & some Turgenev Shakespeare no doubt owe their sugges times Jane Austin. [11] These august writers or three to supreme tive power artistry?there they say, letting fall two so stop, one words or making leaving the phrase ?that will do the trick; & not written reader to realise by degrees [12] that he has taken a charge of gunpowder into his head, which long after rolls its echoes along the hills and valleys of the soul. [13] no reticence, no great power no artistry, people of same in autobiog the sometimes possess gift ?especially language, their narrative; & nothing happens from page to raphy. On they plod with no reason, they summon up some scene [14] which begins page; then, for But far lesser writers, over at once to swell & move & float & is never afterwards to be dislodged, else that one so much about got mixed up with though it has in knocking the original. would be sorry ever again to compare it with Here by way of sample is a scene of the kind ?taken from what bio or to run like It appears inmemory scarcely matters. autobiography graphy a certain farm in the early part of the 19th Century, this ?There was, 127 house on the border and his elderly wife, an [15] in which dwelt elderly gentleman late marriage had been blessed by one son. of Scotland, whose They were very poor, & very proud; the last of their race, [16]which had that only one wing of the old house was sunk into such decrepitude since he came to inhabited: the boy's name, perhaps was Henry. And, now his biography & perhaps to occupy some post under aVictorian gov he was a boy of some initiative, ernment, ardour, & longing for experi ence. At any rate while in the his father slumbered & his mother knitted write quiet dying mansion, he would steal to the tower, he furnished barely enough, [butwith] from his fathers study, which he would [17] which by degrees a bench and few books begged study there late at night under the stars. the old people & the two servants had gone to go, when bed, & read in folios & quartos about Popes & prelates; wars in [18] Hun gary & all the ancient lore of the ancient world?about chemistry & astrol There ogy & he would [then] about battles, policies & dead men's doings ?until he in aworld of the dead. Corpses. Many thought himself the only survivor miles separated his fathers house from any other. The fields that used to be & cultivated were now thick with weeds; the old roads were overgrown to be in winter Life In mud. seemed from them. these deep ebbing away to the stars, which his thoughts turned naturally could be circumstances, in all their mystery. the tower window, One day at some through a a sale he found the relict of clergyman's it for telescope, library, & bought some it it in tower home ?mounted the Now window. shillings, lugged ? after another every night he swept the skies, & noted one constellation named them from his books, became their glittering acquainted with seen, names & imagined the abysses so ing house, were sweeping through which he in his tower, & the sleep was in a fair way to have gone incessantly. He himself the only inhabitant of the glittering world. mad & to have thought But one day?it was midsummer, & the light [19] bright in the sky the to level his at the earth. He got the focus of the fancy took him telescope on this side, here a rock, there see the sheep moving distant hills ?he could a shrub. Lower he pointed it, upon a clump of trees. They glittered leaf by it. This time it rested upon a farm house ?there leaf. Again he lowered were the vane, the door, the stocks against the old grey walls ?& glowing then, within 128 the disc [fastened aptly] upon two faces: aman, awoman; suddenly, that ring of intense visibility. Henry held them fast, & saw them away as itwas, the shock was tremendous. There was life, love, his telescope aside, he crushed his hat on his head and [power]. Sweeping ? to in process of become rushed downstairs along the road into the world Itmay have been ? it Sir Henry Taylor of the Colonial Office? time ?was kiss: Miles all the rest is forgotten.5 Roger Fry: a series of impressions6 I have not aimed at accuracy of date or fact. I these impressions a have tried to make a portrait of Roger Fry almost as novelist might make a character in fiction. to I have taken this course inability partly through In writing from a critical point of view; and partly because he him [1] offered to sit for a portrait. He was to talk about himself, and I to take notes and write a was to be allowed full [2] life inwhich fiction deal with his work self once was play?the create place; idea being that itwas only by having full liberty to invent and that a true life could be written. the sittings never took to so that the I have nothing but memory portrait is depend upon; an amore serve in it written sketch the that may impressionist hope Unhappily merely serious biographer. I aman and awoman, strolled in a garden Many years ago two figures, on the banks of the Cam. Both were look tall, there was a distinguished as came are to was about them. It natural those people? ask, they by, Who a summer afternoon, was answer. was It the and and his wife" "Roger Fry a to connect two moment the themselves with the beauty figures seemed for of the flowers and the willows and the sliding river. Next moment the pic ture had vanished. name a certain in Roger Fry however, meaning insensibly gathered of the next few years. In those quiet days before the war there was a little group of in the background always somewhere people who got to revive ancient musical instruments, up lectures, wished supported classi the current taste in dress and furniture, cal concerts, withstood and col The the course lected is,? century eighteenth seemed to be among name that tables. Roger Fry?his on hand made a circular, them. When printed chairs and 129 a series of lectures on be held at paper, announced early Italian Art would it seemed fitting that Roger five thirty in Leighton House, Fry should be the lecturer. His name suggested rows of people sitting soberly listening to some 'course' or other; and also it colour very discreet water suggested one brown cow or one white in the right paintings, with sheep precisely or an oil a swan on a lake, while a of painting place; sailing youth stretch over dabbles his hand in the waters. It seemed to be essential in ing placid occu those days if you cared for art, to dislike the present; to be perpetually to get back to amore austere and more pied in trying peaceful age, when an was were furniture made by hand, and dig handmade, age when things was nified and rightly placed. Roger that and it world; Fry accepted by no reason should not go on for why that world of art lovers and philistines should not exist side ever, [3] the two worlds, its own way and ignoring the other. by side each going seemed then that there was Those were the associations that made the name of Roger Fry dim and respectable. Roger Frys name had become rather dim and quiet. [4] . . . But Those three dots are a tribute to human weakness. When awhole con is so jumped out the mind Of course there must have ception is swept away and another substituted, of its bearings that it is incapable of observation. some tie, and have looked in been a gradual transition; he must have worn a series of this way or in that; but all these details have been obliterated, by room one impressions, chiefly of colour by single impression ?the [5] had was true. The chairs and tables were strewn changed. Strictly speaking this in Manchester for the natives of Africa. with patterns of cotton made were in pots pictures of chrysanthemum Propped up against the walls seemed to flare away like roaring fires of red paint. Then there was a which on his head; and a a still wet canvas, depicting Christ portrait of standing were left cheek was composed of a cheque upon which lady whose figures were still legible. Also there several rough yellow white pots and hats worn straw. by n?gresses made of black and white was the gentle Don who had lectured on Cimabue in Leighton Where House? He was nowhere. And what there was in his place was something so so so many on to sided, that it is tempting disturbing, complex, poach trans been the novelists preserves and to say that Roger had become, Fry 130 into a don Quixote; into a wildly fant?stica knight, prancing on across the prospect of old tins and fry the queerest assortment hung with as once a at he ?such looked childrens party, where he ing pans and chains formed came dressed up at a cost of three and nine pence atWoolworths shop. ridiculous something laughable extravagant wildly amusing in There was the transformation that he made. Watts paintings Van Gogh African cottons. vanished; took his place. Queen Anne chintz were overhung with it was a source of constant shouts of laughter. Superficially a pageant; on standing in the street and cheering watching It was like the fantastic procession. But no one was the first allowed and the amusement shock seriousness for long. For one thing, after and the surprise and the laughter, his to remain an outsider was turned upon apparent. And then again, the attack left art proper, and literature. Itwas then not so easy to stand outside and laugh. The method of his approachwas by way of a little French book that had Soon that book was Claire by Marguerite Audoux. just appeared ?Marie to tell me youve not read it? Ive in everybodies hands. "D'you mean now already given away twenty copies but heres another." The book is it brought about still reverberate. For But the discussions which forgotten. Marie Claire illustrated the fact that literature was affected by the same dis ease as were in the old eddies. We painting. We writers circling vaguely were using old cliches. We the line of the indictment. Dante were That was using far too many adjectives. That was led to frequent recourse to the bookcase. not was the Shakespeare. Wordsworth the supreme poet, was convicted. Keats was moderns. of the greatest suspected. And Shelley a he set to work with underlined poets and novelists; pencil upon modern was their merely All their useless adjectives, that 'dim', literary phrases. romantic, all that echoed and reverberated was abhorrent. Notes 1. A version chell A. of this collection is included ed., NY: 1990. Leaska, HBJ, inA Passionate Apprentice, 2. The Essays of VirginiaWoolf Volume 1, Andrew McNeillie, HBJ, 1986, page 25. Mit ed., NY: 131 images and scenes that occur in other works they contain (see out notes 4 and 6 for sketches stand the Woolf these essay way below), uses them. Here, the scenes capture her aesthetic of the portrait essay?she 3. While talks about the use of imagination 4. Memories" "Incongruous 1930, and labelled, "Articles, in portraiture is from essays, its use. as she demonstrates a notebook holograph fiction, reviews Volume dated June IV." A ver scene appears in her story "The sion of its telescope Searchlight" (see A Haunted House and Other Stories or The Complete Shorter Fiction of Virginia of the scene also appear in various edited by Susan Dick.) Versions Woolf notes and sketches including "Ghosts" (in The Complete 5. See The ofHenry Taylor, Volume Autobiography Green & Co., don: Longmans, 1885, especially, Shorter Fiction). Taylor, Lon pp. 45, 46, and 73. 1, Henry a series of is an undated 6. "Roger impressions" typescript with Fry: to it bears little resemblance corrections. 's holograph While Woolf a some scenes Moment version of and Other Essays), "Roger Fry" (see The in of The sketch alone focuses on her appear Fry. book-length biography the role of the imagination in portraiture. (and talk) Deletions to the following words and passages correspond preceding the printed text above, and indi the numbers enclosed by brackets within occurs are cate where in 'smanuscript. Woolf the deletion The deletions The numbers preserved incomplete unfinished here as word, sentence. a an single word, they appear in her papers ?whether a a series of words or or seem that full unconnected, Also bracketed here, as in the printed text above, are individualwords especially difficult to decipher and a few editorial com ments. Deletions from "Incongruous Memories" some last in hi account 1. altering altering a narrati death bed of a about the person 2. on his death in his excuse, 132 bed. The His does not matter?but excuse does not the fact of a well remain known What he said it may 3. whatever a matter 4. As have been. there is no reason of fact, and to the 5. appears above [An indecipherable word (possibly "telling") no its line indicating precise placement.] right, with 6. They Whether Often they become 7. what 8. but 9. even is legitimate, it exceeds It, if they much enlarge & the represent the text, in the nearby [Also, 10. other if we read into is true or false, some word what we as reason legiti It is true that if, called ? before us prove to be there, this may be because our to task, we cannot find proof of reading cannot it placed,Woolf then put on the shape they far more left margin, without she would indicating where have has written: the proper lifewhich should be lived.] to the thinker ?so ideas peculiar that at last he finds himself believing that 11. But 12. these the curious power is odd, 13. What some 14. make authors august are too august to be trifled with. of the unsaid. is however, little 15. Life was incredibly silent& lonely for the boy who lived there with his elderly parents. They 16. [In the nearby left margin, it placed, Woolf has written: towers were decayed gentlefolk trying to she would have indicating where the outskirts stood one of those peile without On wh.] 17. where he had made himself a study full of such books as he could borrow met with no [While Woolf ner of drawing that she meant 18. Arabia or perhaps [response]. 's deletion in those buy The cheap at country sales. This youth lines do not cover lines along with to delete all of the words this entire passage, her man the sense of the passage indicate included here.] 133 "was" 19. has deleted the word [Here, Woolf it into the text.] without integrating from "Roger Deletions Fry: in "of the," and written a series of impressions" 1. suggested thatwe should collaborate in a life of him. [Only partially crossed a line in the nearby left margin, without its indicating a to be the subject in has written: experi biographical out. Also, Woolf placement, ment.] 2. biography that was half fiction crossed out. Also, [Only partially there is a faint line through part of the sentence following this deletion. a con to be the line appears While slip of the pen, it is possible thatWoolf the em-dash as well.] the part of the sentence following sidered deleting 3. [Here, Woolf out has typed two different she preferred. With which indicating she had first written, sidered what endings for this sentence with the assumption that she recon I have provided the second ending in the printed text. The ending she typed first is: existing side by side with the world that cared nothing for art; each held its own way in ignorance of the other.] 4. Therefore itwas a considerable some time about 1911 to meet surprise, in the flesh. There he was, the man who Roger Fry for the second time man who had spent the inter in the garden that summer?the had walked on Italian art? But, in one sec vening years lecturing at Leighton House ond, in the time associations, it took to open all those preconceptions a door were into a room, and come torn up. It is not all those there strange fore that statement that itwas 's apparently inconsistent [I have left intact Woolf or as a series of impressions she made no deletions and single impression, to it. However, in the case of this sentence's ending and the corrections sentence that follows, Woolf does show evidence of revision, complete 5. but without making a definitive choice between printed text I have provided the words Woolf two typed in just above the that she reconsidered the assumption with original manuscript, I have deleted the following: had first written. material 134 sense this was true.] In the options. is entirely what different. she In a
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz