Calgary Police Service Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Statistical Summary Centralized Analysis Section Strategic Services Division May 2011 Calgary Police Service Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Prepared by: Centralized Analysis Section Strategic Services Division ©2010 Calgary Police Service Andrew Davison Building 133 - 6 Ave SE Calgary, Alberta T2G 4Z1 May 2011 The information contained in this report is the property of the Calgary Police Service and is copyrighted. Any publication of information contained in this report must include appropriate source citation. Further, any reproduction or distribution of this report in whole or in part without the appropriate source citation and the express written permission of the Chief of the Calgary Police Service is prohibited. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2010 YEAR END SUMMARY – STATIC NUMBERS ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 PERSON CRIMES – STATIC NUMBERS .................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 PROPERTY CRIMES – STATIC NUMBERS ................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.0 DISORDER – STATIC NUMBERS ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 4.0 TRAFFIC – STATIC NUMBERS ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 5.0 OTHER TOPICS – STATIC NUMBERS ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1 LRT SAFETY .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 5.2 FAMILY VIOLENCE/DOMESTIC CONFLICT ............................................................................................................................................ 18 5.3 DRUGS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.4 HATE/BIAS CRIME .................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.5 WEAPONS ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 5.6 YOUTH ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 5.7 CENTRE CITY ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 34 5.8 GANG-RELATED ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 REPORT NOTES The Annual Statistical Report – Statistical Summary provides information on person and property crime trends, disorder calls for service, traffic collisions and offences, LRT crime, domestic violence, drug offences, hate/bias crime, weapon usage and youth crime. Major findings are summarized, using both numbers and rates. The number of offences is important from a workload perspective, while rates reflect the relative seriousness of a problem and are an indicator of change. The statistical data in this report is derived from the Police Information Management System (PIMS) and Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and is compiled by the Centralized Analysis Section. In order to make a fair comparison, we are using data which has not been allowed to increase due to late reporting of crime. Using static numbers allows us to compare crime levels at a specific point in time and make an accurate determination of increases or decreases. The data for previous years contained in this report will only reflect the number of offences reported in the original publication. They are not updated. Although late reporting may occur, and offences may continue to be cleared as time passes, these new events are not taken into account when preparing this statistical report. It is important to note that cases are often cleared months and sometimes years later. Cases “cleared by charge” and those “cleared otherwise” are included in these totals. Tables of the full cumulative numbers of offences, which do include late reporting, are included for reference as appendices. The method of counting is different for person crimes and other Criminal Code offences. Also note that “attempted” incidents are included in these totals. A single criminal incident may consist of more than one criminal offence. CPS crime totals reflect ALL offences reported. Crime totals reported by Statistics Canada count only the most serious offence (violation) in each incident for the entire Calgary Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), therefore the two reports will not match. In July 2006 the electronic reporting process with respect to 24-hour suspensions changed. This is reflected by a large decrease in Provincial Statute offences. Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 2010 YEAR END SUMMARY – STATIC NUMBERS The static crime numbers in this report are derived from historical Calgary Police Service Annual Statistical Reports. These statistics are used in order to make a fair comparison using data which has not been allowed to increase due to late reporting of crime. Using static numbers allows us to compare crime levels at a specific point in time and make an accurate determination of increases or decreases. See appendix A for full static crime data tables. PERSON CRIMES (includes: homicide and attempted homicide, robbery, sex crimes, assault and miscellaneous person crimes) 1000 8200 8000 Rate per 100,000 pop. 8858 8346 8400 8499 8600 8153 # of Offences 8800 8958 9000 950 903.2 900 850 826.5 799.4 800.3 797.7 800 7800 750 7600 2006 • • 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Overall, person crime has increased 4.2% when compared to 2009. Small increases in assault and sex offences drive this increase. However, homicide and attempted homicide offences recorded the lowest volume in the past 5 years. The person crime rate has increased 3.6% since 2009, but still remains 8.5% lower than 4 years ago. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 1 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 PROPERTY CRIMES (includes: arson, break and enter, theft, fraud, mischief and damage to property) 6000 Rate per 100,000 pop. 4972 6 50000 52 207 47500 45000 434 61 458 66 # of Offences 52500 53744 55000 42500 40000 2006 • • • • • • 2 2007 2008 2009 2010 5500 5 419.1 51 18.6 5000 4768.1 4 304.8 4500 405 6 4000 3500 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 The total number of property crime offences has steadily declined since 2006 reaching a 5 year low in 2010 (53744 offences in 2006 compared to 43461 offences in 2010). All property crime categories except break and enters, showed notable decreases. In particular, there were large drops in theft, vehicle damage and vehicle theft offences. Break and enters were the only property crime type to demonstrate an increase compared to 2009; residential break and enters increased 17.7% compared to 2009 and commercial break and enters increased 12.3% respectively. However, there were 9% fewer break and enter offences in 2010 compared to 2006. Theft offences account for approximately 48% of property crimes in 2010; theft under and theft from vehicle under being the highest volume theft offences. Vehicle theft offences recorded the largest overall reduction with 11% fewer offences than 2009. It should be noted that vehicle theft offences have decreased 35.9% since 2006. Other property offences, including mischief and vehicle damage, decreased 6.6% since 2009. In addition, these property offences have steadily declined each year since 2006 resulting in 2,215 fewer offences (10863 offences in 2006 compared to 8648 offences in 2010). The property crime rate in Calgary dropped 5.8% compared to 2009 and was the lowest recorded property crime rate in 5 years. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary DISORDER (call types monitored include: drunk, disturbance, indecent act, juvenile complaint, landlord/tenant dispute, mental health concern, neighbour dispute, party complaint, prowler, suspicious person, threats, drugs, noise complaint, possible gun shots, unwanted guest, prostitution, abandoned auto, speeder, suspicious auto and shots fired) 8000 67642 63794 20000 7500 Rate per 100,000 pop. 23618 23645 20310 18345 64661 40000 65519 60000 69423 # of Calls 80000 18200 100000 7,000 7000 6,424 6500 6,313 6,200 5,987 6000 5500 0 2006 2007 Public 2008 2009 2010 Police 5000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *Note-Rates were calculated using public generated calls only, police generated calls were excluded • • • • In addition to monitoring crime levels, the Calgary Police Service uses a range of incident types to record levels of “Social Disorder”. The incident types selected for this disorder index are those which can have a negative impact on citizens’ perceptions of safety, particularly in public places. Increased volume during 2010 results from a 6.03% increase in public generated calls; suspicious person and disturbance calls demonstrated the highest volumes within public generated calls. Approximately a third of all public generated calls were for suspicious persons and disturbances. Suspicious person calls were the most predominant event type of police generated calls, accounting for 54% of all police generated calls. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 3 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 CRIMINAL CODE TRAFFIC 3800 3442 348 8 3474 34 06 3400 3 524 # of Offenc es 3600 3200 2006 • • 4 400 35 5.3 350 333.9 333.1 32 7.4 321 .2 300 250 3000 • Rate per 100,000 pop. 450 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Criminal Code traffic offences declined slightly in 2010. There was a 1.3% decrease in 2010 when compared to 2009. Over the five year period since 2006, there has been a 2.3% decline. While impaired driving offences have decreased by only 0.7% since 2009, fail/refuse to provide a sample offences have decreased 16.4% when compared to 2009. Criminal Code traffic offence rates have continued to decline with a decrease of 1.9% when compared to 2009. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 1.0 PERSON CRIMES – STATIC NUMBERS Figure 1.1: Person Crime Offences, 2006-2010 7000 *Homicide includes: 1st Degree; 2nd Degree; Manslaughter; and Infanticide. Number of Offences 6000 5000 **Other Offences Causing Death include: Criminal Negligence Causing Death and Other Offences Causing Death. 4000 3000 ***Attempted Homicide includes: Attempted Murder and Conspiracy To Commit Murder. 2000 1000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Homicide* 23 26 33 24 16 Other Offences Causing Death** 3 0 0 1 0 Attempted Homicide*** 19 20 36 38 13 Robbery 1282 1375 1199 1260 1216 Sex Crimes 755 637 714 729 862 Assault 6402 5682 5853 5916 6156 Miscellaneous**** 474 413 511 531 595 Total 8958 8153 8346 8499 8858 ****Miscellaneous includes: Kidnapping/Abduction; Forcible Confinement; Extortion; Criminal Harassment; and Indecent/Harassing Calls. Unit of Count: Victim Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) Overall robbery in 2010 had a 3.5% reduction compared to 2009. This reduction was primarily driven by a 43.6% decrease in financial robberies and a 19.1% decrease in commercial robberies. Homicide reduced by a third from 2009 to 2010 with 8 fewer victims. 2010 saw the lowest volume of homicides for at least the last 5 years. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 5 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 1.2: Person Crime Rates per 100,000 Population, 2000-2010 Rate per 100,000 population 1,100 The Person Crime Rate is expressed as crimes per 100,000 people. 1,000 During 2010, the person crime rate was 826.7, slightly higher than the 2009 rate of 797.7. 900 Currently, the person crime rate is 22.1% lower than it was 10 years ago. 800 700 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Unit of Count: Offences per 100,000 population Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2001-2011); Populations for rates based upon City of Calgary Civic Census In 2010, CPS added two new units to its integral arsenal in the fight against violent crime. BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES UNIT (BSU) The Behavioral Sciences Unit (BSU) was formed in August 2010 and has 4 members. Along with assessing and developing threat management plans, this unit supports existing investigative and operational units by providing information related to investigative psychology. MISSING PERSON UNIT As a specialized unit within the Homicide Unit, the Missing Person Unit (currently 2 officers) was formed to provide a proactive approach when dealing with all missing persons cases. 6 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 1.3: Violent Crime Severity Index, Calgary 2002-2010 The Violent Crime Severity Index (VCSI) is a statistical measure developed by Statistics Canada. Violent Crime Severity Index 120 110 It is designed to measure the relative seriousness of crime within a community. Individual crime types are weighted, based on court records of incarceration rates and sentence lengths. 100 90 80 70 60 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Calgary 90.2 97.8 90.4 97.1 97.9 96.9 92.4 88.8 80.7 National Average 96.4 97.7 96.1 98.5 100 96.5 94.6 93.7 * The benchmark for this index was a score of 100, set to 2006 National data. Unit of Count: Weighted by victim count, except financial and commercial robbery. Source: Crime Data: 2002 to 2009 PIMS (DataMart), April 2010, 2010 PIMS (DataMart) April 2011; Stats Canada, July 2009; Population: City of Calgary, 2010 *National data for 2010 not available at time of print. CRIME SEVERITY Traditional crime rates count each offence equally. Changes in high volume, but less serious offences (such as common assault) can influence the person crime rate and even mask changes in the more serious offences. The crime severity index attempts to correct for this by applying a relative weight to each offence. The VCSI for Calgary continued to decline in 2010, the fourth consecutive year that declines have been experienced. At 80.7, it compares favourably to the national index which in 2009 (the most recent published year) was 93.7. Although the national index has also been declining in recent years, the VSCI in Calgary has done so at a faster rate, with 2010 being 9% below 2009 and 16.7% below the 2007 index. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 7 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 2.0 PROPERTY CRIMES – STATIC NUMBERS Figure 2.1: Property Crime Offences, 2006-2010 Number of Offences 30000 25000 Break and Enter includes: residential, commercial and other break and enters. 20000 15000 Theft includes: shoplifting, theft from vehicle, and possession of stolen property. 10000 5000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Break and Enter 7484 6599 5990 5923 6812 Theft 24962 24557 24172 22472 20659 Vehicle Theft* 7179 7773 7260 5174 4604 Fraud 3256 2808 2569 3034 2738 Mischief & Property Damage 10863 10470 9735 9263 8648 TOTAL 53744 52207 49726 45866 43461 Vehicle theft includes: both actual and attempted vehicle thefts. Property damage includes: vehicle damage and arson. *Vehicle Theft includes Vehicle Theft and Attempted Vehicle Theft Unit of Count: Offence Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) Crime Prevention Unit (CPU) The Crime Prevention Unit supports residential security through a variety of programs. The Police and Community Awareness Program (PCAP) disseminate crime and safety messages to citizens by telephone and recently through email. The Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) program fosters healthy, safe communities through well-planned environmental design. The Be a Good Witness initiative encourages citizens to observe, report and record suspicious activity. The Keep It Locked Program was launched in partnership with the AMA encouraging home owners to be security–minded, focusing on unattended open garage doors. 8 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 2.2: Property Crime Rates per 100,000 Population, 2000-2010 6,500 The Property Crime Rate is expressed as crimes per 100,000 people. Rate per 100,000 population 6,000 During 2010, the property crime rate was 5.8% lower than 2009. 5,500 5,000 Currently, the property crime rate in Calgary is 33.7% lower than it was 10 years ago; this was also the lowest property crime rate in the past 10 years. 4,500 4,000 3,500 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Unit of Count: Offences per 100,000 population Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2001-2011); Populations for rates based upon City of Calgary Civic Census “The Anti Graffiti Symposium (TAGS) was held in Calgary in October of 2010, jointly hosted by the Calgary Police Service and The City of Calgary Animal & Bylaw Services. The 6th annual conference brought together individuals working for municipalities, lawenforcement agencies, schools, community groups, businesses and other agencies affected by graffiti vandalism. During the two day conference, attendees shared and gained knowledge in the area of graffiti-vandalism prevention, enforcement, and investigation. National authorities on the subject gave presentations on their experiences as a means to foster expertise amongst colleagues. Specifically, break-out sessions explored areas such as: graffiti databases, anti-graffiti products, vandal profiles, hate crime and graffiti, investigative techniques, and gang graffiti. In Calgary, graffiti continues to be a high cost to taxpayers in terms of property damage and cleanup, investigations, and in some cases, negative emotional and psychological effects. 2010 was a notable year as the Calgary Police Service laid its first hate crime charge in relation to graffiti-vandalism.” Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 9 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 2.3: Non-Violent Crime Severity Index, Calgary 2002-2010 The Non-Violent Crime Severity Index (NVCSI) is a new statistical measure developed by Statistics Canada. Non-Violent Crime Severity Index 120 110 100 90 It is designed to measure the relative seriousness of non-violent crime within a community. Individual crime types are weighted, based on court records of incarceration rates and sentence lengths. 80 70 60 50 40 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 113.1 115.4 112.3 104.5 98.7 91.1 80.5 73.1 69.3 National Average 107.4 110.5 107.3 102.4 100 93.9 90.0 84.7 * Calgary The benchmark for this index was a score of 100, set to 2006 National data. Source: Crime data: 2002 to 2009 PIMS (DataMart), April 2010, 2010 PIMS (DataMart) April 2011; Stats Canada, April 2010; Population data: City of Calgary, 2010 *National data for 2010 not available at time of print. CRIME SEVERITY Traditional crime rates count each offence equally. Changes in high volume, but less serious offences (such as common assault) can influence the person crime rate and even mask changes in the more serious offences. The crime severity index attempts to correct for this by applying a relative weight to each offence The NVCSI has declined for the past 7 years. At 69.3, in 2010 it was 5.2% below 2009 and almost 40% below the 2003 index. Calgary has been below the national index since 2006 and, similar to the VCSI, has experienced declines at a greater rate than have been seen nationally. 10 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 3.0 DISORDER – STATIC NUMBERS Definition In addition to monitoring crime levels, the Calgary Police Service uses a range of incident types to record levels of “Social Disorder”. The incident types selected for this disorder index are those which can have a negative impact on citizens’ perceptions of safety, particularly in public places, but that do not tend to be represented well in “traditional” crime statistics which have a propensity to focus more on person and property crime. The incident types included are: drunk, disturbance, indecent act, juvenile complaint, landlord/tenant dispute, mental health concern, neighbour dispute, party complaint, prowler, suspicious person, threats, drugs, noise complaint, possible gun shots, unwanted guest, prostitution, abandoned auto, speeder, suspicious auto, and shots fired. This report is based on the following call types: • Dispatched: Public generated calls to which officers were dispatched; • Other: Public generated calls to which officers were not dispatched; • Onview: Police generated calls; • Cancelled calls (disposition/ call type) are excluded. Disorder as a proportion of total calls for service Disorder 26% Disorder is a high volume issue; every fifth call generated by officers or members of the public is related to a disorder incident. Disorder calls account for: • ~22% of public generated calls; • ~45% of police generated calls. Other Calls for Service 74% Call Type 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Change 2009 to 2010 Police Generated 18200 18345 20310 23645 23618 -0.11% Public Generated 69423 65519 64661 63794 67642 6.03% Total 87623 83864 84971 87439 91260 4.37% Police generated calls remained stable during 2010, reflecting the continuity of officer pro-activity. Public generated calls increased 6.03%; higher volumes of public generated calls for suspicious persons and disturbances contribute to this overall increase. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 11 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Disorder Calls by Police and Public Call Type, 2010 Police 26% Members of the public generate 74% of disorder calls. Officers are dispatched to 90% of public generated calls. Police generated calls account for 26% of total disorder calls. Public (Dispatched) 66% Public (Other) 8% 6 call types account for approximately 63% of public generated disorder calls to which officers are dispatched: Suspicious Persons (21%), Disturbances (12%), Unwanted Guests (12%), Suspicious Autos (10%), Noise Complaints (9%) and Intoxicated Persons (7%). 54% of police generated calls relate to Suspicious Persons. Public (Dispatched) Police Public (Other) Police Generated Calls by Event Type, 2010 OTHER 11% DRUGS 4% DISTURBANCE 4% Public Generated Calls by Event Type, 2010 OTHER 37% DRUNK 11% NOISE COMPLAINT 9% SUSPICIOUS AUTO 10% UNWANTED GUEST 11% SUSPICIOUS AUTO 16% SUSPICIOUS PERSON 54% 12 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 21% DISTURBANCE 12% Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 4.0 TRAFFIC – STATIC NUMBERS Figure 4.1: Reportable Collisions and Rates, 2006-2010 40000 36000 34000 33000 34297 35000 Rate per 100,000 pop. 38415 38619 37000 34190 # of Collisions 38000 39542 4500 39000 4000 3786.4 3791.6 360 5.5 3447.4 3500 3 200.8 3000 32000 31000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2500 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Calgary Police Service, Traffic Section - Static data (PIMS: February 2007 – March 2011) Note: Reportable collisions exclude collisions along private roadways or in public parking lots. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 13 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Table 4.1: Traffic Collision Rates per 100,000 Population, 2006-2010 Severity of Collision 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Reportable Fatal Collisions 4.6 3.7 3.5 2.0 2.1 Persons Killed 4.9 4.3 3.7 2.1 2.2 Reportable Non-Fatal Injury Collisions 340.9 310.1 278.5 224.7 219.3 Persons Injured 448.2 400.1 361.8 287.1 280.9 Reportable Property Damage Collisions 3,101.9 3,472.6 3,509.6 3,378.8 2979.3 Total Private Property Collisions (818.0) (819.5) (983.9) (1,128.3) 1126.1 Total Reportable Collisions 3,447.4 3,786.4 3,791.6 3200.8 3,605.5 Source: Calgary Police Service, Traffic Section - Static data (PIMS: February 2007 – March 2011) Table 4.2: Traffic Summonses, 2006-2010 Category 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Speeding 234,154 225,469 240,637 278,933 324,903 43,005 56,080 47,124 42,561 49,869 2,579 6,087 7,490 8,509 7,445 Other Non-Hazardous 64,821 66,077 66,896 75,107 81,116 Miscellaneous 32,298 31,861 33,581 27,415 18,488 376,857 385,574 395,728 432,525 481,821 Other Hazardous Pedestrian Total Summonses Source: Calgary Police Service, Traffic Section - Static data (PIMS: February 2007 – January 2011) 14 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 4.2: Collisions Involving Alcohol or Drugs, 2006-2010 Number of Collisons 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Fatal Collisons 18 13 12 15 10 Injury Collisions 126 120 114 97 88 Property Damage Collisions 279 254 267 306 293 Total Collisions 423 387 393 418 391 Source: Calgary Police Service, Traffic Section - Static data (PIMS: February 2007 – March 2011) There were 24 traffic fatalities in Calgary in 2010; 10 of these involved alcohol or drugs. The Calgary Police Service Traffic Section, in partnership with the City of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, and MADD, participated in the launch of the Report Impaired Drivers (RID) campaign in Calgary. This is part of MADD Canada’s nationwide Campaign 911 program that encourages members of the public to pull over and call 911 to report impaired drivers. Early results saw a 60% increase in the number of calls from Calgarians reporting suspected impaired drivers. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 15 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 5.0 OTHER TOPICS – STATIC NUMBERS 5.1 LRT SAFETY Not all incidents related to the LRT are reflective of criminal acts or disorderly behavior. For example, the “non-offence” category includes reports of traffic accidents as well as lost & found property. Figure 5.1: CPS LRT Incidents, 2006-2010 900 Number of Incidents 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crimes 258 267 200 261 262 Property Crimes 194 193 185 181 156 Vehicle Related 610 806 695 350 175 Other CC 230 263 201 172 208 Other Statutes 77 84 43 76 64 Non-Offences 270 311 358 259 266 Total 1672 1862 1653 1335 1153 Unit of Count: Incident Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) 1. 2. 3. 16 In 2010, CPS recorded (PIMS reports) 1153 incidents in relation to the LRT, a decrease of 13.6% (from 1335 incidents in 2009). The most common crime categories were person crimes, other cc and non-offences, accounting for approximately 65% of all incidents. The two most common types of person crimes in 2010 were incidents of assault (including assaults against peace officers) and robbery; assaults accounted for approximately 60% of all person crimes in relation to the LRT. Vehicle related crime decreased by 50% overall compared to 2009 (175 incidents in 2010 vs. 350 incidents in 2009). In 2010, vehicle crime reached a five year low, recording a 71% decrease compared to 2006. Vehicle Related incidents include stolen vehicles, theft from vehicles and damage to vehicles. Other Statutes include Federal (YCJA), Provincial (TSA) and Municipal (Bylaw) Acts. Non-Offences include reports on lost or found property, traffic accidents, suicide attempts and other non-criminal activities. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.2: LRT Incidents by Leg, 2010 South 38% Unclassified 5% Downtown 13% Northwest 14% Northeast 30% Unit of Count: Incident Source: PIMS, February 2011 NOTE: “Unclassified” incidents represent police reports indicating offences on Transit (LRT) property, although an exact address was not specified. Northwest Leg Stations Northeast Leg Stations: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Crowfoot Dalhousie Brentwood University McMahon – Banff Trail Lion’s Park SAIT – Jubilee Sunnyside McKnight – Westwinds Whitehorn Rundle Marlborough Franklin Barlow – Max Bell Zoo Bridgeland South Leg Stations: Downtown Leg includes: • • • • • • • • • • • • Victoria Park – Stampede Erlton – Stampede th 39 Avenue Chinook Heritage Southland Anderson Canyon Meadows Fish Creek – Lacombe Shawnessy Somerset – Bridlewood All eleven platforms in the “Free th Fare Zone” along the 7 Avenue corridor Calgary Transit data (these are additional incidents captured within the Calgary Transit database) Of 11,002 dispatched calls, 7991 calls resulted in records being added to the Calgary Transit database, (72.6% of all calls attended). In 2010, Calgary Transit Peace Officers submitted reports for 1778 on-view incidents as a result of preventative patrol activities. This represents 22% of all reports submitted to the Calgary Transit database in 2010. *The top five most common calls for service in 2010 were: 1. Check on Welfare: 3355 calls 4. Disturbance: 328 calls 2. Unwanted Patron: 1867 calls 5. Intoxicated Person: 274 calls 3. Subject Wanted: 397 calls *Note: Calgary Transit calls for service have similar call types as those used by Calgary Police Service within the CAD system. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 17 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 5.2 FAMILY VIOLENCE/DOMESTIC CONFLICT Figure 5.3: Domestic Related Calls for Service, 2006-2010 Domestic relationships include those of: 15789 14267 12807 12000 11994 Calls for Service 14000 13822 16000 • father or mother; foster parent; • son or daughter; brother or sister; foster son or daughter; foster brother or sister; • cohabitating partner; husband or wife; common law husband or wife; boyfriend/girlfriend; • ex-boyfriend/girlfriend; ex-cohabitating partner; ex- 10000 common law husband or wife; ex-husband or wife; • grandmother or grandfather; • extended family (e.g., uncle/aunt; nephew/niece, 8000 father/mother-in-law, greatgrandfather/grandmother). 6000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: CAD Report 2 - Calls for Service by Type and Handling Method, March 2011 WORKING TOGETHER, COMMUNITY PARTNERS, SOCIAL AGENCIES AND THE CALGARY POLICE SERVICE CAN END THE CYCLE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN OUR CITY The CPS Domestic Conflict Unit is spearheading four ongoing initiatives with community partners to continue its commitment to this goal. These projects are: 1) Domestic Conflict Resource Team (DCRT): phase 1 of this joint initiative between CPS, HomeFront and Child & Family Services offering a collaborative, proactive approach addressing high-risk and chronic non-charged domestic situations continues in 5 District. 2) High Risk Management Initiative (HRMI): a joint effort between CPS, HomeFront, Probation Services, Crown Prosecutors Office and various community counseling services. This initiative provides a more structured and collaborative approach to managing high-risk domestic violence offenders. Two members of DCU lend full-time investigative support to the initiative. 3) Elder Abuse Response Team: the effectiveness of this joint effort between CPS and Calgary Family Services has been enhanced by the recent addition of a full-time social worker, enabling greater collaboration and initiation of investigations into allegations of elder abuse. The Kerby Centre is the sponsor agency for this project. 4) Connect Family and Sexual Abuse Network: a partnership between fourteen Calgary and area service providers, including the Calgary Police Service, working together to simplify access to services for people affected by family and sexual violence. The Domestic Conflict unit recently provided Connect with a full-time on-site police presence. 18 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.4: Domestic Incidents with Criminal Code Offences, 2006-2010 Number of Incidents 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crime 2030 1697 1909 2104 2224 Property Crime 841 726 655 657 616 Other CC 407 309 384 416 462 TOTAL Criminal Offences 3278 2732 2948 3177 3302 Unit of Count: Most Serious Violation per Incident Source: PIMS: February 2007-2011 Figure 5.5: Domestic Related Incidents by Most Serious Violation, 2010 Property Crimes 19% Person Crimes 67% Other CC 14% Unit of Count: Most Serious Violation per Incident Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 19 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 5.6: Domestic Related Victims of Violent Crime - All Offences, 2006-2010 3000 Number of Offences 2543 2500 2361 2241 2178 2000 1826 1500 1000 500 4 0 5 12 119 203 10 1 5 102 265 199 7 0 9 277 126 8 5 15 274 131 127 5 2 12 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Homicide 4 10 7 8 5 Attempted Homicide 5 1 0 5 2 Robbery 12 5 9 15 12 Sex Assault 119 102 126 127 131 Assault 2241 1826 2178 2361 2543 Miscellaneous 203 199 265 277 274 Total 2584 2143 2585 2793 2967 Unit of Count: Offence (Victim) Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) 20 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.7: Specialized Investigations by CPS Child Abuse Unit, 2006-2010 272 253 246 200 204 Investigations 250 278 300 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Calgary Police Service, Child Abuse Unit, March 2011 CHILD ABUSE There is a higher risk of being the victim of sexual abuse for girls than boys. Most offenders of sexual abuse know their victims and are in a position of authority over them (i.e. parent/step parent, mother’s boyfriend, or babysitter). The most important thing to remember is to treat any disclosure as serious and report it immediately. We are currently working with Children's Services, Alberta Health and the City of Calgary in building a Child Advocacy Center for the full investigation of child abuse complaints. This approach will be most effective in collaborating agencies and allowing victims to obtain services from each agency simultaneously. Additionally, this will also allow each agency to remain informed of the victim’s progression through the investigation. We are also working with Children's Services and Public Health Nurses to develop a proactive team of professionals to monitor high risk parents of newborn babies to prevent abuse from occurring. There will be teams of Child Service and Public Health workers who will attend calls. The CPS role will be to establish risk management and attend scenes when necessary; this will become a CARRT position once the process is in place. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 21 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 5.3 DRUGS Figure 5.8: Drug Offences, 2006-2010 CIVIL FORFEITURE Number of Offences 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Possession 2006 1231 2007 947 2008 857 2009 919 2010 1095 Trafficking* 1135 1065 758 1311 1115 Cultivation** 63 73 33 46 74 Other*** 1 0 0 0 0 2430 2085 1648 2276 2284 Total Unit of Count: Offence; Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) *Includes Trafficking and Possession For The Purpose Of Trafficking. **Includes Cultivation and Produce/Manufacture Cannabis offences. *** “Other” drug offences include: Importation/Exportation and Property/Proceeds From Trafficking. Civil forfeiture is a Provincial legislation designed to disrupt organized crime groups through the forfeiture of assets used or obtained in criminal offences. The assets gained through civil forfeiture are returned to victims of crime in Alberta. In Calgary, civil forfeiture money has been used to fund youth at risk programs and in the province to fund rural women’s shelters and Victim Assistance programs. In 2010 the Calgary Police Service seized over $4.5 million dollars under this legislation. Approximately 90% of these seizures resulted from drug-related crime. ELECTRICAL FIRE INSPECTION PROGRAM (currently underway and will continue into 2011) A project spearheaded by ENMAX, involving ALERT Green Team South and the Calgary Fire Department. This is an ENMAX initiated program designed to identify Electricity thefts and/or dangerous electrical consumption. The EFIP coordinator reports the incidents to CPS for criminal investigation, if applicable. If no criminal connection can be determined, then it is dealt with internally by ENMAX or referred to the CFD. 22 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.9: Number of Incidents by Drug Type, 2006-2010 1200 Incidents 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Marihuana 895 747 743 916 1174 Cocaine - crack 857 768 559 906 589 Cocaine - coke 321 311 220 247 242 Ecstasy (MDMA) 96 76 77 82 89 Methamphetamine 49 24 42 28 55 Other Drugs* 182 213 109 260 208 Unit of Count: Incident (not charges) – an incident will be counted once for each category of drug present. Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) *“Other Drugs” include: heroin, oxycontin, magic mushrooms, morphine, methadone, PCP, ketamine, etc. Prior to 2010, Hash was included in “Other Drugs”, now included as “Marihuana”. CITY OF CALGARY COORDINATED SAFETY RESPONSE TEAM (Currently underway and will continue through 2011). A multi-agency team consisting of representatives from the City of Calgary Inspections Dept, CPS, AHS, SCAN, and City Bylaw Services; created to address the chronic problem of derelict, abandoned and unsafe properties that occur primarily as the result of abandoned and/or dismantled marihuana grow operations. The CSRT addresses these issues under the authority of the Alberta Municipal Government Act or the Alberta Safety Codes Act ultimately resulting in the forced remediation or demolition of the affected structure. Costs incurred as a result of implementing this strategy are applied against the property’s title. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 23 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 5.10: Marihuana Grow Operations, 2006-2010 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Warrants 2006 128 2007 113 2008 96 2009 114 2010 119 Accused 65 72 71 73 81 Charges 212 278 230 183 267 Source: 2010 Statistics: Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams (ALERT), Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit, March 2011; 2006-2008 Statistics: Calgary Police Service Drug Unit, February 2007-2009, 2009 Statistics: Same source as 2010 statistics, January 2010 Table 5.1: Value of Drugs Seized, 2006-2010 DRUG TYPE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 $141,219 $386,039 $167,167 $172,878 $521,816 $90,376 $160,065 $132,765 $1,724,256 $101,094 $110,003 $748,762 $444,606 $355,284 $534,294 Total Cocaine $1,361,478 $3,687,228 $3,260,678 $1,739,450 $1,137,718 Marihuana** $3,183,440 $1,229,688 $2,449,666 $2,882,828 $4,883,800 Marihuana - Grow Op*** $63,282,136 $62,658,174 $61,670,020 $89,953,500 $88,235,080 Total $68,168,652 $68,869,956 $68,124,092 $96,828,196 $95,413,802 Ecstasy/MDMA* Methamphetamine Other Drugs Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) *In 2010, $400,000 of ecstasy was seized in a single incident. ** In 2010, over $3 million of marihuana was seized within 3 incidents. Note, prior to 2010 Hash was included as ‘Other Drugs’, now included as ‘Marihuana’. *** “Marihuana Grow Operation” values were gathered from the Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams (ALERT), Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit database (Drug Unit database prior to 2009) as they are a special circumstance not included in the marihuana total above. 24 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 5.4 HATE/BIAS CRIME Figure 5.11: Hate/Bias Incidents, 2006-2010 63 57 50 57 65 75 Number of Incidents 100 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) Figure 5.12: Hate/Bias Offences by Violation Type, 2010 Hate-bias is a criminal offence committed against a person or property that is motivated in whole or in part by bias, prejudice or hate, race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, gender, age, mental or physical disability or sexual orientation of the victim. These types of offences are particularly susceptible to under-reporting given the sensitive nature and motivations of some of the crimes. Examples of hate-bias crime include: • Violence, threats of violence • Vandalism, graffiti • Threatening phone calls • Physical assaults • Hate mail • Destruction of religious symbols • Fire bombings Source: PIMS, February 2011 * Other includes B&E, possession of weapon, etc. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 25 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 5.13: Hate/Bias Crimes by Motivation, 2006-2010 150 Number of Incidents 125 100 75 50 25 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total hate/bias crimes 75 65 57 63 57 Motivated by other* 1 2 0 0 0 Motivated by religion 12 9 8 16 11 Motivated by sexual orientation 10 9 6 2 5 Motivated by race/ethnicity 52 45 43 63 41 Unit of Count: Offence Source: Static data (PIMS: February 2007-2011) *”Other” motivations include: age, gender, nationality, and disability. Hate crime is a “message crime” that undermines community values and cohesion at the expense of citizens’ rights. One hate crime is one too many. Six years ago, Calgary Police Service developed the ‘Hate-Don’t Buy In’ program, which is a program aimed at educating the community and specifically youth about Hate crime. The program provides complimentary interactive presentations to local junior and senior high school students and also works closely with community organizations to help educate and identify hate crime. This project was awarded the 2008 Solicitor General’s Crime Prevention Award and the 2006 Civil Rights Award. 26 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 5.5 WEAPONS Figure 5.14: Weapon Use & Intimidation in Violent Crime Incidents, 2006-2010 6000 Number of Incidents 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Firearm 220 237 211 255 212 Edged Weapon 808 752 640 609 671 Other Object* 925 819 790 732 748 Verbal Threats 604 563 522 561 611 Physical Force 4909 4370 4554 4654 4718 Unknown/None 730 721 819 793 783 TOTAL 8196 7462 7536 7604 7743 Unit of Count: Incident (Most Serious Weapon) Source: Static data (PIMS: May 2010, April 2011) * ‘Other Object’ includes any physical object which is neither a knife (cutting/piercing instrument) nor a firearm. Examples include vehicles, OC spray, clubs and blunt objects, beverages and their containers, household items small enough to be picked up and swung as a club or thrown towards the victim, caustic substances, body fluids, etc... Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 27 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 5.15: Weapons Causing Injury, 2006-2010 Number of Offences 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Firearm 36 50 49 46 30 Edged Weapon 345 301 256 232 247 Other Object 797 705 673 629 614 Physical Force 3498 3269 3476 3419 3427 Unknown 137 110 168 118 136 TOTAL 4813 4435 4622 4444 4454 ‘Weapon Causing Injury’ refers to the weapon used to cause injury to the victim rather than the most serious weapon present during an incident. Unit of Count: Injured Victim Source: Static data (PIMS: May 2010, April 2011) * ‘Other Object’ includes any physical object which is neither a knife (cutting/piercing instrument) nor a firearm. Examples include vehicles, OC spray, clubs and blunt objects, beverages and their containers, household items small enough to be picked up and swung as a club or thrown towards the victim, caustic substances, body fluids, etc... • In 2010, weapon use and intimidation in violent crime incidents rose slightly in line with the small increase in overall violent crime. o Firearms use dropped 16.9% from 2009 and returned to the level experienced in 2008 o Edged weapons use conversely increased 10.2% • The number of injured victims in 2010 remained static compared to 2009 o Injuries caused by firearms fell 34.8% from 2009 to a 6 year low of 30 victims, with only 3 of those incidents resulting in the death of the victim o Although a slight increase was seen in edged weapons injuries from 2009, 2010 remained 13.5% below the 5 year average for injuries caused by this weapon type 28 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.16: Injury Level of Firearm Victims, 2006-2010 35 30 Victims 25 20 15 10 5 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Death 3 4 7 6 3 Major 11 24 22 11 11 Minor 22 19 20 33 17 Unknown 0 3 0 1 1 Total* 36 50 49 46 30 Unit of Count: Injured Victim; Source: Static data (PIMS May 2010, April 2011) *Not all firearms injuries are as a result of the discharging of the firearm. Some result from its use to strike the victim and this total should not therefore be construed as representing the number of victims who were shot. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 29 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Figure 5.17: Injury Level of Edged Weapon Victims, 2006-2010 250 Victims 200 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Death 10 9 7 7 4 Major 111 123 89 86 79 Minor 222 167 157 138 164 2 2 3 1 1 345 301 256 232 247 Unknown Total Unit of Count: Injured Victim; Source: Static data (PIMS May 2010, April 2011) 30 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.18: Injury Level of Victims of Other Objects, 2006-2010 (Excluding Physical Force) 800 700 Victims 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Death 11 17 17 10 6 Major 67 59 78 41 32 Minor 788 691 662 650 574 Unknown 11 8 7 3 6 Total 877 775 764 704 614 Unit of Count: Injured Victim; Source: Static data (PIMS: May 2010, April 2011) Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 31 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 CPS Community & Youth Services Section 5.6 YOUTH Figure 5.19: Youth Offences as a Percentage of all CC Offences, 2006-2010 % youth offences 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crime 17.84% 17.68% 15.58% 13.43% 14.71% Property Crime 21.99% 23.26% 20.91% 20.04% 16.60% Other CC 14.62% 14.44% 11.96% 11.33% 10.90% Total CC 18.62% 19.16% 16.73% 15.54% 14.00% youth offending rate Figure 5.20: Youth Offending Rate, per 10,000 youth aged 12-17, 2006-2010 1000 750 500 250 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crime 145 126 114 106 118 Property Crime 450 413 353 372 265 Other CC 230 191 156 180 167 Total CC 825 730 623 658 551 Source: Static data (PIMS February 2007-2011) 32 School Resource Officers These officers aim to create a safe & healthy learning environment for youth, as well as being positive role models. Youth Intervention Programs YARD: a program designed to help youth at risk avoid or escape a gang lifestyle. MAAST: targets youth ages 5-15 exhibiting behavior that puts them at risk for criminal involvement or increased risk of victimization. Gateway: an initiative that facilitates the connection between police, young people, their families & appropriate community resources. About Face: targets youth ages 12-18 and is a youth diversion program for youth whose behavior has brought them into conflict with authority figures. Youth Education Programs CPS officers deliver educational material in the schools from Kindergarten to Grade 12. Start Smart, Stay Safe (S4): an initiative that will provide education that is strengthbased for children and families to enhance their resilience. Youth Mentorship Team A mentorship team working towards enhancing the development of positive assets within our youth. Initiatives include: CPS Cadet Corps, Power Play Hockey Program, Jr. Police Academy, Youth Connect, SuperKids, Mentoring Program & CYOC Youth Mentorship. Serious Habitual Offender Program (SHOP) This program targets habitual youth offenders with the ultimate goal of preventing them from becoming career criminals. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Figure 5.21: Youth Victims as a Percentage of CC Offences, 2006-2010 % youth victims 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crime 19.11% 19.23% 17.59% 16.38% 16.49% Property Crime 2.36% 2.66% 2.33% 2.34% 2.33% Other CC 9.16% 8.17% 10.81% 7.07% 8.92% Total CC 5.73% 5.72% 5.48% 5.37% 5.60% youth victimization rate Figure 5.22: Youth Victimization Rate, per 10,000 youth aged 12-17, 2006-2010 500 250 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Person Crime 224 200 187 188 186 Property Crime 120 129 109 103 96 Other CC 38 27 36 26 31 Total CC 382 356 333 317 313 Source: Static data (PIMS February 2007-2011) Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division The Calgary Police Service’s work with young people has been guided by the principle of early intervention, which endeavors to address the correlates of crime early in the life-course prior to the accumulation of multiple problems and offences. Over the past five years, the Service has entered into new partnerships with relevant organizations to support these efforts. There has also been a significant growth in funded pilots which should provide critical lessons for programming across the Service and its partners over the next three years. Evidence-based programming The CPS is currently engaged in three key pilots which should begin to provide useful information for programming with young people, starting in 2012. The Youth At Risk Diversion (YARD), Multi-Agency School Support Team (MASST) and the Start Smart Stay Safe (S4) Child and Family projects are all innovative interventions, focused on providing critical services to young persons and their families in an effort to prevent and/or reduce further involvement in offending/criminal behavior. The Calgary Police Cadet Corp is also providing a direct response to the Service’s mission of engaging diverse members of the population in learning about and developing an interest in policing as a career. These projects all have significant research components which are expected to provide useful information to the Service and social service agencies in general, around community engagement, successful approaches to working with children and youth to prevent involvement in offending/criminal behavior as well as approaches for engaging Calgary’s diverse communities as future recruits. 33 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 5.7 CENTRE CITY The Centre City is of vital importance to Calgarians because it is the economic, social, cultural, and environmental heart of the city. Many people travel into the Centre City each day; therefore, a high portion of Calgary’s population is regularly exposed to any signals of crime and disorder in the area. Recent surveys show that Calgary citizens associate concerns for personal safety with the downtown core. Moreover, the Centre City acts as a barometer for visitors to Calgary, informing the perceptions of crime and disorder in the city as a whole. The Downtown Commercial Core and the Beltline communities, which account for a large part of the Centre City area, experience the highest volumes of crime and disorder of any communities in the city. This high incidence of crime and disorder, coupled with the area’s political and symbolic importance combine to make the Centre City a necessary focus for policing activity and for inclusion in this report as a topic of interest. The Centre City continues to maintain reduced levels of crime and disorder. The CPS (along with Animal/Bylaw Services, The City and other partners) has implemented a wide range of initiatives in this area over recent years, all of which are potential contributors to reduced levels of crime and disorder. In addition to these proactive initiatives there are a number of extraneous variables that may also be contributing to the observed changes: construction, closure of licensed establishments, community engagement, etc. On average 6.2 property crimes and 1.7 person crimes are recorded in the Centre City each day and officers are dispatched to 24.4 disorder incidents. The Centre City (made up of 6 communities out of ~280 citywide) accounts for 7.5% of citywide property crime, 10.8% of citywide person crime and 14.7% of citywide disorder. Person Crime 2010 (Incidents) Centre City, 638, 11% Rest of City, 5259, 89% Disorder 2010 (Incidents) Property Crime 2010 (Incidents) Centre City, 2249, 7% Rest of City, 27789, 93% Centre City, 8895, 15% Rest of City, 51659, 85% Unit of Count: Incident (MSV) th Source: PIMS & CAD, February 16 2011 The sum of the centre city and rest of the city will not equal the published city total as some incidents are not assigned to specific geographic areas 34 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary CENTRE CITY PERSON CRIME Homicide*, 4, 1% 638 617 600 740 779 # of Incidents 800 988 1000 Assaults, 4 73, 74% Sex Offences, 51, 8% Person crime in the Centre City maintained similarly low volumes to 2009, seeing only a minor increase of 3%. 400 200 Robbery, 110, 1 7% 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Assaults accounted for nearly threequarters of Centre City person crime incidents, robberies accounted for a further 17%. An increase in the number of assaults contributed to the increase in Centre City person crime. Robberies were at a 5-year low in 2010. *Homicide includes: 1st Degree; 2nd Degree; Manslaughter; Criminal Negligence; Other Offences Causing Death; Attempted Murder and Conspiracy To Commit. CENTRE CITY PROPERTY CRIME 2010 is the 5 year low for Centre City property crime, following a strong and sustained downward trend. Mischief, 458, 2 0% Thefts in the Centre City were 50% lower than the 5 year average. Particularly noteworthy reductions in vehicle crime show 60% fewer incidents in 2010 than were recorded in 2005. T heft Under, 1315, 58% 2000 1000 0 2006 2007 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 2008 2009 2249 3000 2 736 Arson, 12, 1% 4000 3802 Theft Over, 135, 6% 4036 # of Incidents 5000 503 5 6000 Break and Enter, 329, 15% 2010 Break and Enter incidents increased 33% over 2009 but remained significantly below the five-year average. 4 out of 5 B&Es targeted commercial premises. 35 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 CENTRE CITY DISORDER Oth er, 204 5, 23% 36 D runk, 132 9, 1 5% 2006 2007 2008 2009 8895 8963 10496 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 12160 Disturb ance , 1 454 , 16 % # of Incidents U nwa nted Gue st/Patro n, 252 1, 2 9% Centre City disorder in 2010 remained on par with the low volumes achieved in 2009. 14237 Suspi cio us Person , 15 46, 1 7% 2010 Four event types accounted for ~77% of disorder in the Centre City: 1) Unwanted guests 2) Suspicious persons 3) Disturbances 4) Intoxicated persons (Drunks) Unwanted guest and suspicious person complaints reached 5 year lows in 2010. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary 5.8 GANG-RELATED Figure 5.23: Gang-Related Homicides, 2006-2010 # of Homicides 15 15 10 9 9 7 5 3 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Unit of Count: Victim Source: Calgary Police Service Homicide Unit, March 2011 Table 5.3 Gang-Related Gun Crime, 2006-2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Gang-Related Homicides 9 9 15 7 3 Gang-Related Homicides Involving Guns 4 6 12 6 2 Source: Calgary Police Service Homicide Unit, March 2011 During 2010, gang related violent encounters were extremely scarce compared to recent previous years. This is likely due to the investigation and subsequent incarceration of several key individuals responsible or believed responsible for shootings and homicides in Calgary. Four individuals involved in the shooting in Chinatown on November 16, 2008 are serving federal sentences, and four individuals allegedly responsible for the triple homicide at Bolsa Restaurant are remanded in custody awaiting their trials for first degree murder. Suppression strategies utilizing the Gang Suppression Team, directed patrols and uniform presence at community events likely to be attended by gangs, continues to be an effective deterrent to gang activity and criminal behaviours. Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 37 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 APPENDICES • Appendix A – Static Crime Statistic Tables • Appendix B – Cumulative Numbers • Appendix C – Year End Disorder Statistics • Appendix D – Youth Offences 38 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Appendix A Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 39 Statistical Summary 40 Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Statistical Summary 41 Statistical Summary 42 Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Statistical Summary 43 Statistical Summary 44 Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary P ROP ERTY CRI M ES Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 45 Statistical Summary 46 Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division Annual Statistical Report 2006 – 2010 Statistical Summary Appendix C YEAR END DISORDER INCIDENTS – BY TYPE DISORDER INCIDENTS ABANDONED AUTO Number of Incidents 2008 2009 2010 2008 by Call Type Police Public 2008 Total % 2009 by Call Type Police Public 2009 Total % 2010 by Call Type Police Public 2010 Total % 652 575 593 302 350 0.8 % 242 333 0.7 % 263 330 0.6 % DISTURBANCE 8600 8161 9088 881 7719 10.1 % 902 7259 9.3 % 973 8115 10.0 % DRUGS 3570 3515 3833 928 2642 4.2 % 738 2777 4.0 % 876 2952 4.2 % DRUNK 6037 6847 7440 1792 4245 7.1 % 2430 4417 7.8 % 2524 4916 8.2 % FIREARM INVOLVED IN COMPLAINT 118 95 102 5 113 0.1 % 3 92 0.1 % 7 95 0.1 % INDECENT ACT 533 648 689 28 505 0.6 % 38 610 0.7 % 41 647 0.8 % JUVENILE COMPLAINT 3444 3006 3061 351 3093 4.1 % 344 2662 3.4 % 332 2729 3.4 % LANDLORD/TENANT 1742 1893 2063 24 1718 2.0 % 41 1852 2.2 % 28 2034 2.3 % MENTAL HEALTH CONCERN 1630 1660 2136 143 1487 1.9 % 120 1540 1.9 % 330 1806 2.3 % NEIGHBOUR DISPUTE 1276 1436 1692 21 1255 1.5 % 30 1406 1.6 % 21 1671 1.9 % NOISE COMPLAINT 5618 5971 5910 36 5582 6.6 % 27 5944 6.8 % 36 5874 6.5 % PARTY COMPLAINT 2081 2335 2245 58 2023 2.4 % 57 2278 2.7 % 38 2207 2.5 % 858 644 612 19 839 1.0 % 15 629 0.7 % 17 595 0.7 % 1013 1435 1361 356 657 1.2 % 855 580 1.6 % 837 524 1.5 % PROWLER 284 349 311 12 272 0.3 % 15 334 0.4 % 9 302 0.3 % SPEEDER 459 516 749 43 416 0.5 % 37 479 0.6 % 43 706 0.8 % SUSPICIOUS AUTO 10499 10519 10730 4186 6313 12.4 % 4113 6406 12.0 % 3884 6846 11.8 % SUSPICIOUS PERSON POSSIBLE GUNSHOTS PROSTITUTION 24008 26271 27104 10705 13303 28.3 % 13099 13172 30.0 % 12855 14246 29.7 % THREATS 2732 2843 3366 105 2627 3.2 % 120 2723 3.3 % 114 3250 3.7 % UNWANTED GUEST 9823 8726 8187 315 9508 11.6 % 419 8307 10.0 % 390 7797 9.0 % TOTAL 84977 Source: CAD Datawarehouse, May 2011 87445 91272 20310 64667 100.0 % 23645 63800 100.0 % 23618 67642 100.0 % Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division 47 Statistical Summary Annual Statistical Report 2006 - 2010 Appendix D Number of Youth Offences 2006 OFFENCE CATEGORY 2007 2008 2009 2010 ACC YPM YPS OTH TOT ACC YPM YPS OTH TOT ACC YPM YPS OTH TOT ACC YPM YPS OTH TOT Homicide 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Other Offences Causing Death 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Attempted Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 Sex Offences ACC YPM YPS OTH TOT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 42 4 0 12 58 7 4 0 12 23 41 5 2 2 50 20 2 1 7 30 38 5 0 5 48 Robbery 127 1 1 11 140 182 2 0 9 193 124 2 1 4 131 139 0 0 7 146 187 2 0 4 193 Common Assault 378 87 56 72 593 294 83 44 70 491 310 88 30 50 478 246 62 11 71 390 288 66 15 73 442 Weapon/Bodily Harm 205 21 4 22 252 197 14 3 19 233 150 22 2 11 185 144 8 1 17 170 159 15 1 9 184 Aggravated Assault 17 0 0 1 18 13 1 0 2 16 11 0 0 0 11 7 0 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 Other Assault 41 0 0 2 43 31 0 0 1 32 44 4 0 2 50 46 0 1 1 48 29 3 0 3 35 Miscellaneous 23 7 1 2 33 19 3 0 4 26 6 3 0 3 18 11 6 0 6 23 22 10 0 5 37 TOTAL PERSON CRIME 834 120 62 122 1138 745 107 47 117 1016 691 130 35 72 928 616 78 14 109 817 734 101 16 99 950 Residential B&E 99 11 3 21 134 64 21 0 18 103 101 7 0 38 146 36 3 0 12 51 65 4 0 6 75 Commercial B&E 64 10 12 7 93 56 7 11 16 90 34 2 5 4 45 53 3 0 135 191 51 10 2 7 70 Other B&E 17 2 2 28 49 14 0 0 20 34 17 2 0 5 24 6 1 0 9 16 5 0 0 0 5 Theft Over 78 47 3 17 145 66 3 6 9 84 67 7 2 12 88 43 2 0 5 50 31 3 0 3 37 Theft Under 771 737 323 114 1945 934 646 296 106 1982 926 562 245 98 1831 861 564 188 226 1839 602 502 137 108 1349 PSP 295 35 10 20 360 312 27 15 16 370 166 25 9 11 211 175 17 10 17 219 146 21 3 21 191 Fraud 65 16 27 6 114 90 8 7 8 113 46 8 4 14 72 107 3 9 13 132 28 13 4 5 50 Other 367 159 105 76 707 339 108 44 75 566 262 104 25 56 447 209 74 25 66 374 219 60 25 46 350 1756 1017 485 289 3547 1875 820 379 268 3342 1619 717 290 238 2864 1490 667 232 483 2872 1147 613 171 196 2127 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 28 8 12 317 301 27 6 6 340 189 16 1 2 208 285 8 1 6 300 299 13 1 28 341 Miscellaneous CC 1393 38 28 34 1493 1102 62 9 30 1203 964 47 14 31 1056 1022 30 3 35 1090 931 33 4 29 997 TOTAL OTHER CC 1663 66 36 46 1811 1404 89 15 36 1544 1153 63 15 33 1264 1307 38 4 41 1390 1230 46 5 57 1338 TOTAL CRIMINAL CODE 4253 1203 583 457 6496 4024 1016 441 421 5902 3463 910 340 343 5056 3413 783 250 633 5079 3111 760 192 352 4415 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIME Vice/Gaming Explosives/Weapons Source: PIMS, February 2011; Unit of Count: Offence Definitions: ACC: Accused; ONC: Offender Not Charged; TOT: Total offences in category under consideration; YPM: Young Person Measures; YPS: Young Person Sanctions; Other: includes charged in other incidents, complainant declines, CPS/Government policy, private information advised, departmental discretion, insufficient evidence, and when the offender is under 12 years of age. 48 Calgary Police Service Centralized Analysis Section, Strategic Services Division
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz