Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring The Occtober 23, 2011 2 Van, Turkey T Earrthquake (M Mw=7.2) PRO OBABILIST TIC ASSES SSMENT O OF THE SE EISMIC HA AZARD FO OR THE LAKE L V VAN BASIN N Introdu uction The seismic hazardd in Van Laake region iss retrieved from f the stu udy of probaabilistic asssessment of seism mic hazard in Turkey conducted c ffor the Min nistry of Traansportion T Turkey, aim ming the preparaation of an earthquake e resistant deesign code for the construction off railways, seaports and airpports (DLH, 2007). Method dology of PSHA P The genneral methoodology of calculatingg probabilisstic seismic hazard is well established in literaturre (Cornell 1968). Th he method involves tw wo separatee models: a seismicity y model describiing a geogrraphical distribution evvent sources and the distribution oof magnitud des, and an attennuation moddel describiing the effeect at any site given ass a functionn of magnittude and source-tto-site-distaance. The seeismicity m model may comprise c a number of source regiions, the seismiccity of which should bee expressedd in terms of a recurren nce relationnship of eveents with magnituudes greaterr or equal to t a certain value. The attenuation n model relaates the earrthquake intensityy (i.e. the effect of itt, as a genneral term) at a site to o magnitudde, distance, source parametters and sitee conditionss. For forrecasting seeismic occu urrences num merous models have been b develooped. The simplest stochasttic model for f earthquaake occurreences is the Homogeneeous Poissoon Model, which w is used in this study. For the earrthquake eveents to follo ow that mod del, the folllowing assu umptions are in oorder: 1. Earthquakees are spatiaally indepenndent; 2. Earthquakees are tempo orally indeppendent; 3. Probabilityy that two seeismic evennts will takee place at the same tim me and at th he same place approoaches zero.. Obviouusly for the above assum mptions to be applicab ble to a dataa set, it shou ould be free of foreand afteershocks. This T has beeen achievedd in our study by remo oving all the he dependen nt events from thhe earthquakke cataloguee. The reccurrence reelationship of the eveents is exp pressed witth the helpp of the em mpirical log g N A bM b relationnship first deefined by Gutenberg G -R Richter: where N is the nu umber of shocks with magnnitude greateer or equal to M per unit u time an nd unit areaa, and A an nd b are seismicc constants for any given g regionn. The sou urce regions may be described as lines represennting the knnown faultss or areas off diffuse seiismicity, so o that M maay be related d to unit 1 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring length oor unit areaa. The valuee of N will also generaally be foun nd assumingg that M haas upper and low wer bounds M1 M and Mo o. Using aan applicatiion of the total t probabbility theoreem the prob bability perr unit time that t that ground motion ampplitude a* is exceeded can be exprressed as fo ollows (McG Guire, 1993): PA a * in time t / t vi GA m, r a * f m m f r r mdmdr i PI i m, r is the prob bability thatt the maxim mum effect I is less than an i. Given m and r, where f r m f m m is the probbability den nsity functioon for magnitude, an nd r is the pro obability f r m distribuution functioon for distan nce. r is dependeent on the geometric g naature of the source. Seismicc Source Zoonation mic source zone is deffined as a sseismically homogenous area, in which every point A seism within tthe source zone is assumed to haave the sam me probabiliity of beingg the epicen nter of a future earthquake. An ideall delineatioon of seism mic sourcee zones reqquires a complete c compreehension off the geolo ogy, tectonnics, paleosseismology, historicall and instrrumental seismiccity, and othher neotectonic featuress of the regiion under sttudy. Howevver, it is not always possiblee to compille detailed informationn in all theese fields for f the majoority of thee world. Thus, ffrequently, seismic so ource zonees are deteermined witth two funndamental tools; a seismiccity profile and the teectonic reggime of thee region un nder considderation. Although A seismicc source zonnation is a widely w usedd methodolo ogy to deteermine earthhquake hazaard, it is not the only approoach. Sincee delineatioon of the seismic sourrce zones sstill remain ns rather o methhods for ev valuating subjectiive, researcchers (e.g. Frankel, 1 995) are suggesting other seismicc hazard, inn order to eliminate thee subjectiviity of this procedure. p T This is partticularly importaant in areass where thee tectonic structure iss very fragmented andd the seism micity is diffuse. Whereas in i most reg gions of Tuurkey, the seismicity s is relativelyy well docu umented, major ffaults are often o well defined d andd the sourcce zones arre fairly obbvious. Hen nce it is consideered adequate to use thee conventioonal method d of seismic source zonnation for Turkey in this studdy. The seiismic sourcce zonation used in thhis study is essentially y based on the seismicc source zonationn model of Turkey developed d w within the context off a project conducted for the Ministryy of Transpportion Turrkey, aiminng the prepaaration of an a earthquaake resistan nt design code foor the consstruction off railways, seaports an nd airports (DLH, 20007), which was an updatedd version off the GSHA AP (1999, E Erdik et al. 1999) and d TEFER (22000) models. The main im mprovemennt of the DLH D model when com mpared to the previouus two mod dels (the GSHAP P and TEFE ER models)) was the reepresentatio on of main fault f traces (such as th he North Anatoliian and thee East Anattolian Faultts) with lin near sourcess. In order to accountt for the spatiallyy more difffuse moderaate size seissmicity arou und these faaults, widthss of at leastt several kilometters were asssigned to th he zones eveen if the asssociated fau ults were weell expresseed on the surface.. In the new w model how wever, earthhquakes witth magnitud de > 6.5 havve been assumed to 2 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring take plaace on the linear zonees, whereass the smaller magnitude events aassociated with w the same faault have beeen allowed to take placce in the surrrounding laarger areal zzone. In add dition to these zoones, backgground zones have also been used in i this modeel. Figurre 1. Sourcee Zonation m model used in the study y of DLH (22007) 3 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Earthq quake Recu urrence Rellationships The em mpirical reccurrence reelationship for earthq quakes (Gu utenberg annd Richter Model. Richter, 1954) is as follows: log N = a + b M where N is the nuumber of th he earthquaakes above the magnittude M in a given reg gion and within a given periiod and a an nd b are reggression con nstants. The Gutenbergg-Richter reccurrence model hhas been exxtensively used u in manny seismicitty studies an nd has alsoo been confiirmed to hold forr micro-earrthquakes. The T coefficiient a is a constant c thaat is dependdent on the location and tim me of the saample used and b repreesents a co onstant thou ught to be ccharacteristiic of the region. The eaarthquake catalogues c are often biased du ue to incom mplete repoorting for smaller magnituude earthquuakes in earrlier periodss. Thus to fit f the recurrrence relatiionship to a region, one shoould choose among usin ng (1) a shhort sample that is comp plete in smaall events orr (2) a lonnger samplee that is com mplete in larrger events or (3) a coombinationn of the two o data sets to complette the deficcient data th thereby obtaaining a homogeeneous dataa set. A direcct attempt too fit these daata to a regrression relaationship maay result in quadratic or o higher order exxpressions to accomm modate the iinherent biaas and inho omogeneity of the dataa. In the methodd used in thhis study, an a artificiallly homogeeneous data set is sim mulated thro ough the determiination of thhe period over o which tthe data in a given maagnitude grooup are com mpletely reportedd (Stepp, 19973). The com mputed recuurrence paraameters as w well as the maximum m magnitudes m associated with the source zzones are prresented in Table 1. 4 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Table 11. Source Zo one Informaation Source Zon ne No Fa ault Name Mech hanism a b M min - Mmaks Z34 5.0 – 6.7 Outside Zone Z34 Nortth Anatolian Fault Zone (NAF) Right Laterral Strike Slip 5.0 0.8 6.8 – 7.9 Inside Zoone Z39 Outside Zone 5.0 -6.9 Gok ksun Fault ı Left Lateraal Strike Slip 2.7 0.7 Z39 Outside Zone 7.0 – 7 .5 Z42 Left Lateraal Strike Slip Outside Zone Z42 4.6 0.9 5.0 – 6.7 A Faullt East Anatolian Zo one(EAF) 6.8 – 7.9 Inside Zoone Z43 Outside Zone Z43 _Zagros Faultt Bitlis_ Zone 5.0 – 6.6 hrust Th 4.7 1.0 Inside Zoone Z46 6.7 – 7.0 North N East Anaatolian Fault Zone Left and Right R Lateral Strik ke Slip 5.6 1.1 5.0 - 7.7 Z47 Pamb baSevan Fault Right Lateraal Strike Slip + Zone 3.9 0.9 Th hrust 5.0 - 7.3 Z48 Tebriiz Fault Zone 5.0 - 7.3 Right Laterral Strike Slip 4.4 1.0 d Motion Prediction P Equations E Ground Owing to the geological and geo-tectoniic similarity y of Anatoliia to the Caalifornia (strike slip faults similar to North, N North heast and E East Anatoliian Faults), the follow wing ground d motion 5 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring predictiion equationns currently y being useed for the assessment of earthquuake hazard d for the Westernn US was uttilized: 1. Average off Boore, Jo oyner and Fumal (1997), Sadigh h et al.(19997), and Campbell C (2003) for Peak P Groun nd Accelerat ation (PGA) Average off Boore et al. (1997), S Sadigh et.al. (1997) and d Campbell (1997) for Spectral Acceleratioon (Ss and S1) S Hazard d Results The prresent analyysis has been conduucted for reeturn perio ods of 4755 and 2,47 75 years corresponding to 90% 9 and 98 % probabbilities of non-exceede n ence in 50 years respeectively. The sellected grouund motion parameterrs of analyssis were th he Peak Grround Acceeleration (PGA), the Spectraal Accelerations (SA) at periods of o 0.2 sec and a 1 sec. A grid size of 0.05 by 0.055 was usedd. The earth hquake locaation uncerttainty was taken t as 100 km. The standard s deviatioons in the attenuation functions were taken n as given in the assoociated papeers. The results are presented in Figurre 2 throughh Figure 7 in form of the mean oof the log normally n distribuuted results obtained from f compuutations witth the abov ve attenuatiion relation nships in bedrockk conditionss. The subb-province based b hazarrd result is aalso presented in Table 2. Table 2. Haazard resultts for Tabannlı, Erciş, Muradiye M and d Van-Merkkez districtss Epicentra al Location (Tabanlı)) Erciş Muradiye e Van ‐ Merkez PGA SA(T=0..2s) SA(T=1..0s) PGA SA(T=0..2s) SA(T=1..0s) PGA SA(T=0..2s) SA(T=1..0s) PGA SA(T=0..2s) SA(T=1..0s) 72 0.23 0.51 0.14 0.12 0.27 0.09 0.1 0.26 0.075 5 0.27 0.59 0.15 475 0.43 0.94 0.28 0.22 0.49 0.16 0.18 0.41 0.14 0.47 1.04 0.31 2475 0.64 1.42 0.46 0.34 0.76 0.26 0.29 0.65 0.22 0.7 1.56 0.51 6 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figgure 2. PGA A for 10% prrobability oof exceedence in 50 yeaars (blue triaangle show ws the epicenter of the Vann earthquak ke given by KOERI). 7 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figurre 3. SA (T= =0.2s) for 10% 1 probabbility of exceeedence in 50 5 years (bllue triangle shows the epicen nter of the V Van earthquaake given by KOERI). 8 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figurre 4. SA (T= =1.0s) for 10% 1 probabbility of exceeedence in 50 5 years (bllue triangle shows the epicen nter of the V Van earthquaake given by KOERI). 9 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figgure 5. PGA A for 2% prrobability off exceedencce in 50 yeaars (blue triaangle showss the epicenter of the Vann earthquak ke given by KOERI). 10 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figuree 6. SA (T=0.2s) for 2% % probabilitty of exceed dence in 50 years (bluee triangle sh hows the epicenter of the Vann earthquak ke given by KOERI). 11 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figure 7. SA (T=11.0s) for 2% % probabilityy of exceed dence in 50 years y (blue triangle sho ows the epicenter of the Vann earthquak ke given by KOERI). Site Specific Modification off Design Baasis Ground d Motion The connstruction of o the design basis reesponse speectrum for different SSite Classess can be achieveed through the t modificcation of thee spectral acceleration a n (SA(0.2s) and SA(1ss)) given by the hhazard mapps in Chaptter 6 or SEE E and FEE E level earth hquakes. Thhe Uniform m Hazard Responnse Spectruum presenteed in NEH HRP (2003, 2009) th hat will be employed d as the approprriate spectraal shape is constructedd with two parameters: the site-sppecific shorrt period (SMS); aand medium m-period (SM1 hape of the spectrum s fo or 5% dampping is illusttrated in M ). The sh Figure 88. 12 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring The sitte-specific short-period s d spectral rresponse accceleration parameter, SMS and mediumm period pparameter SM1can be ob btained as ffollows: SMS = F Fa * Ss where Ss = SA(0.22s) SM1 = F Fv * S1 where S1= SA(1s)) Where Ss and S1 are a represen nted by the spectral accelerations at T=0.2 seec and T=1.0 sec at referencce soil sitee (Vs,30 7 760m/s.) obbtained from m the hazaard analysiis. Fa and Fv are respectiively the applicable a Short S and Medium Period Amp plification FFactors, deffined in NEHRP P (2003 andd 2009) (Tab ble 3 and T Table 4). The site classees indicatedd on these taables are to be obbtained from m the geo-teechnical invvestigations to be carrieed along thee pipeline ro oute. *TS: trannsition period from constantt response accceleration to constant respon nse velocity, iin units of secconds, and TL: traansition periodd from constan nt response veelocity to consstant responsee displacement nt, in units of seconds s Figuree 8. Standarrd Shape of the Respon nse Spectrum m (NEHRP,, 2009) 13 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Tablle 3. Valuess of Fa as a function off Site Class and 0.2s Sp pectral Acceeleration (att B/C boundaryy with Vs = 760 m/s) Site C Class Ss0.25 Ss=0.550 Ss=0.75 S Ss=1.0 1.25 Ss A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0 B 1 1 1 1 1 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1 1 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 0 F * * * * * * Siite-specific geotechnical g investigationn and dynam mic site respo onse analysess shall be perrformed. Tablle 4. Valuess of Fv as a function off Site Class and 1.0s Sp pectral Acceeleration (at B/C boundaryy with Vs = 760 m/s) Site C Class Ss=0.200 Ss= =0.3 Ss=0.4 S Ss0.1 Ss0.5 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0 0.8 0.8 B 1 1 1 1 1 C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2 2.4 2.4 F * * * * * * Site-specific geeo-technicall investigatioon and dynam mic site respo onse analyses es shall be peerformed. QTM b based Site Dependent D Hazard Reesults The QT TM map baased site deependent annalysis has been b condu ucted for ret eturn period ds of 72, 475 andd 2,475 yeaars correspo onding to 500%, 10% an nd 2 % probabilities oof exceedence in 50 years reespectively. The selecteed ground m motion paraameters of analysis a werre the Peak Ground 14 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Accelerration (PGA A), and the Spectral S Acccelerations (SA) at perriods of 0.22 sec and 1 sec. The results are presenteed in Figure 9 throughh Figure 12 in form off the mean oof the log normally n distribuuted results obtained o fro om computaations with the above GMPEs G in ssite conditio ons. Figuure 9. QTM based SA (T=0.2s) ( forr 10% probaability of ex xceedence in 50 years (blue ( e given by K KOERI). trianglle shows thee epicenter oof the Van earthquake 15 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figurre 10. QTM M based SA (T=1.0s) foor 10% prob bability of exceedence iin 50 years (blue trianglle shows thee epicenter oof the Van earthquake e given by K KOERI). 16 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figuure 11. QTM M based SA A (T=0.2s) fo for 2% probaability of ex xceedence in 50 years (blue ( trianglle shows thee epicenter oof the Van earthquake e given by K KOERI). 17 Bogaazici Univerrsity, K Kandilli Ob bservatory aand Earthquake Researcch Institute Depa artment of Earthquak ke Engineerring Figuure 12. QTM M based SA A (T=1.0s) fo for 2% probaability of ex xceedence in 50 years (blue ( trianglle shows thee epicenter oof the Van earthquake e given by K KOERI). Contribbuted by: E. E Çaktı, M.B. M Demirrcioğlu, M. Erdik, Y. Kamer, B. Sungay, E. E Şafak, K. Şeşeetyan, E. Uççkan, E. Vurran, C. Yennidoğan, C. Zulfikar Z (in n alphabeticcal order) 18
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz