Turk J Agric For 29 (2005) 305-313 © TÜB‹TAK Evaluation of Thermal Treatability of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) Treated with Heated TanalithC of CCA above and below the Fibre Saturation Point ‹lker USTA Hacettepe University, Wood Products Industrial Engineering, 06532 Beytepe, Ankara - TURKEY Received: 09.08.2004 Abstract: Caucasian fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) was treated using the full-cell process with heated tanalith-C at elevated temperatures from 5 to 70 ºC above and below the fibre saturation point (FSP: 32.1%) (in 40% and 20% moisture content (MC) levels). Thermal treatability was determined on the basis of preservative uptake (the percentage of void volume filled, VVF%) in transverse flow (a combination of tangential and radial directions) and triplex flow (based on all 3 flow directions). To characterise the treatability, analysis of the coefficient of transverse thermal conductivity was also performed above and below the FSP. Thermal conductivity (Tc) increased markedly with increasing temperature at either MC level. Tc was found to be relatively high at 40% MC due to the contribution of free water in the lumens. However, VVF% did not follow the evolution of the temperature in both flow directions at either MC level. The VVF% variation seemed to depend on the FSP, e.g., it showed almost a parabolic trend in 20% MC, and reached the highest values in either direction at around 30 ºC. Key Words: Caucasian fir, Thermal treatment, FSP, Elevated temperatures, Thermal conductivity Is›t›lm›fl Tanalith-C (CCA) ile Lif Doygunlu¤u Noktas› Üzerinde ve Alt›nda Emprenye Edilen Do¤u Karadeniz Göknar›n›n Is› Destekli Korunabilirlik Özelli¤inin Belirlenmesi Özet: Do¤u Karadeniz göknar› (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.), 5 ºC`den 70 ºC`ye kadar de¤iflen s›cakl›klarda ›s›t›lm›fl tanalithC kullan›larak -dolu hücre yöntemine göre- lif doygunlu¤u noktas› (LDN: %32.1) üzerinde ve alt›nda (%40 ve %20 rutubet miktar›nda) emprenye edildi. Is› destekli korunabilirlik özelli¤i, koruyucu s›v› içerilme miktar›n›n (KS‹%, a¤aç malzeme hücre boflluklar›n›n koruyucu s›v›yla içerilmesi yüzdesi) belirlenmesiyle -te¤et ve radyal ayr›m› olmaks›z›n- liflere dik yönde ve tüm ak›fl yönlerinin aç›k oldu¤u tripleks yönde niceliksel olarak tan›mland›. Bu özelli¤in nitelenmesi aç›s›ndan, liflere dik yöndeki ›s› iletme katsay›s› da ayr›ca belirlendi. Is› iletme özelli¤i (I‹Ö) sonuçlar›, -LDN üzerinde ve alt›nda- s›cakl›¤›n artmas›na ba¤l› olarak I‹Ö`nin göreceli bir flekilde artt›¤›n› gösterdi. Özellikle, hücre bofllu¤undaki serbest su miktar›n›n fazla oldu¤u %40 rutubet miktar›ndaki ›s› iletme de¤erleri, %20 rutubet miktar›na göre, daha yüksek bulundu. Emprenye sonuçlar› ise, LDN üzerinde ve alt›nda -hem liflere dik hem de tripleks yönde- sürekli olarak artan ›s› de¤iflimine ba¤l› olarak KS‹% de¤erlerinin do¤rusal bir flekilde artmad›¤›n› gösterdi. Bununla birlikte, KS‹% de¤ifliminin, LDN etkisinde kald›¤› görüldü. Örne¤in, %20 rutubet miktar›ndaki KS‹% de¤iflimi, her iki ak›fl yönünde de parabolik bir görünümde -daha düzenli bir nicelikte- gerçekleflirken, en yüksek de¤erlerine 30 ºC seviyesinde ulaflt›. Anahtar Sözcükler: Do¤u Karadeniz göknar›, Termik koruma, LDN, S›cakl›k art›r›m›, Is› iletme Introduction In recent years, much attention has been paid to the protection of the environment. Many researchers in the field of wood preservation have studied novel preservation techniques; these have no or less impact on the environment. Thermal treatment technology is one of these. It has long been known that the different intrinsic wood properties (such as durability, sorption behaviour, shrinkage and swelling behaviour, and strength properties) are changed by thermal treatment at elevated temperatures (Stamm, 1964; Burmester, 1973; Giebeler, 1983). The level of change very much depends on wood species and the process conditions, in which the * Correspondence to: [email protected] 305 Evaluation of Thermal Treatability of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) Treated with Heated Tanalith-C of CCA above and below the Fibre Saturation Point temperature and the absence of oxygen play a predominant role. However, only recently in Europe have attempts been made to develop industrially applicable technology to thermally modify wood. Developments took place in the Netherlands (Ruyter, 1989; Boonstra et al., 1998; Tjeerdsma et al., 1998; Militz and Tjeerdsma, 2000), France (Dirol et al., 1993; Vernois, 2000), Germany (Rapp and Sailer, 2000; Rapp et al., 2000); and Finland (Viitanen et al., 1994; Jämsä and Viitaniemi, 1998; Syrjänen et al., 2000). The total production capacity of heat-treated wood in 2001 was estimated at approximately 165,000 m3, and was planned by the 3 industry to increase to some 265,000 m in 2003 (Militz, 2002). Langrish and Walker (1993) stated that knowledge of the thermal properties (such as the specific heat, the thermal conductivity, and the thermal diffusivity) is not only of importance when considering the insulating and fire resistant properties of wood. It is also needed to determine the steaming time for peeler logs and the warm-up time for timber prior to kiln drying. Furthermore, it is a necessity in preservative treatment, especially for thermal treatment processes. Thermal conductivity is expressed by the coefficient of thermal conductivity (k). This is a measure of the quantity of heat in calories that will flow during a unit of time (s) through a body 1-cm thick with a surface area of 1 cm2, when a difference of 1 ºC is maintained between the 2 surfaces, i.e. k is measured in (kcal m / h ºC)* (Kollmann and Cote, 1968). In general, the thermal conductivity of wood is low because its structure is porous. Dry wood is one of the poorest conductors of heat due in part to the low conductivity of the actual cell wall materials, and in part to the cellular nature of wood, which in its dry state contains within the cell cavities a large volume of air –one of the poorest conductors known (Desch and Dinwoodie, 1996). When examining the heat flow in slender pieces of timber or round wood, the longitudinal heat flow can be neglected even though the thermal conductivity in the axial (longitudinal) direction is about twice the conductivity in the transverse (tangential, radial) direction (Siau, 1984). Important differences do not exist between the radial and tangential directions (Ratcliffe, 1964a, 1964b, 1964c). Knigge and Schulz (1966) determined the coefficients of thermal conductivity of different woods at 20 ºC for 3 flow directions (in kcal m / h ºC) as follows: 0.191–0.284 (axial), 0.104–0.151 (radial), and 0.090–0.140 (tangential). Thermal conductivity (Tc) is influenced by various factors, such as wood structure, density, moisture, temperature, extractives, and defects (checks, knots, cross grain) (Steinhagen, 1977). Sova et al. (1970) stated that Tc increases proportionally with wood density, moisture content (MC), and temperature. According to Kollmann (1951), when moisture is increased or reduced below the fibre saturation point (FSP) by 1%, Tc is increased or reduced from 0.7% to 1.18%. However, above the FSP, the increase or reduction is somewhat higher, and in general wood with an MC higher than 40% has an approximately 1/3 higher conductivity than dry wood. Furthermore, Tc is affected by temperature. Kanter (1957) determined the k (kcal m / h ºC) for birch at temperatures between 20 and 80 ºC at different MCs, and found variations from 0.17 to 0.21 at 20% MC and from 0.22 to 0.27 at 40% MC. Little is known about the relationships between thermal conductivity and transverse permeability, but the thermal treatability of Caucasian fir –a refractory softwood species– deserves further investigation. It may be natural to assume that the preservatives that produce a sediment (i.e. water bornes) when heated would not be suitable for preservative treatment, because when wood is placed in a hot preservative, moisture evaporates and the air contained in the cell cavities expands (Hunt and Garratt, 1967). On the other hand, heating the water borne solutions may be more useful to improve fluid absorption for the treatment of refractory species when the full-cell preservative treatment is operated by heated preservative chemicals (e.g., tanalithC of CCA). The objective of the present study, therefore, was to clarify the role of the solution’s temperature on the permeability of Caucasian fir in both transverse and triplex directions at elevated temperatures ranging from 5 to 70 ºC and at MC levels above and below the FSP. * In the English system, thermal conductivity (k) is measured as the quantity of heat in British thermal units (Btu) that will flow in 1 h through a body 1-in thick and 1 ft2 when a difference if 1 ºF is maintained between the 2 surfaces. 1 Btu in / h ft2 ºF = 0.12404 kcal m / h ºC 306 ‹. USTA for Abies species (Pratt, 1974). Thereafter, T&R samples were double sealed with ABS solvent cement (polymer dissolved in methyl ethyl ketone, Durapipe). Materials and Methods Samples were collected from the segments of logs used in a previous study (Usta, 2004), and prepared in equilateral triangle cross-sections (Figure 1). Long (in 25 mm length for 240 samples) and short samples were produced (10 mm for 60). As the physical properties of Caucasian fir, such as the FSP (32.1%) and the volumetric shrinkage value (βv: 11.8%), had been determined in our preliminary report (Usta, 2004), the short samples were used for the determination of ovendry density and the initial MC by an oven-drying process. Data assembly and experimental processing were conducted according to the “novel guide” (Usta and Hale, 2004). A flow chart was also designed for the determination of thermal conductivity according to the literature (MacLean, 1941; FPL, 1952; Deliinski, 1977; Tsoumis, 1991) (Figure 2). To observe the effect of temperature on the coefficient of thermal conductivity (k) of Caucasian fir, thermal conductivity at 0 ºC (k0) was initially determined. Since k0 is mainly influenced by changes in MC and nominal density (R, based on oven-dry weight and volume at the current MC), R was determined by the following relationship: R = (βv / FSP) using data previously reported by Usta (2004). The levels of MC were 40% and 20% due to the FSP. The long samples were marked for triplex flow and T&R (transverse flow, a combination of tangential and radial directions), and dried sequentially using the schedule K in accordance with the recommended kiln-drying schedule X x2 t 3 4 5 d TR triplex, d, T&R (mm) in equilateral triangle cross-section 25 D 10 25 E rays 25 triplex T&R d F C TL B G A H s acheid axial tr S TS (in gro ou wth ter ri sap ngs wo od ) S RL Xx 2 1.3 m 120 cm X x1 40 cm (each) 1 triplex flow (all faces open) T&R (transverse flow: combination of tangential and radial flow) for T&R: TS is sealed but both TLS and RLS are unsealed each triplex, T&R for kiln drying process and treatment experiment d (determinative) sample for either of triplex and T&R each d for oven drying process and density determination Figure 1. A diagram showing the collection and preparation of the experimental samples in equilateral triangle cross-section for determination of thermal treatability of Caucasian fir (dimensions not to scale). 307 Evaluation of Thermal Treatability of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) Treated with Heated Tanalith-C of CCA above and below the Fibre Saturation Point oven drying process m x (g) (103 ± 2 °C) triplex to calculate thermal conductivity (k) k) iMC (%) ((mx - mod) / mod ) x 100 m od (g) m x (g) V od (cm 3 ) ((h 2 x L) / 2) mx / ((iMC / 100) + 1) kiln drying process D 0 (g cm -3) D MC (g cm -3) R (g cm -3) MC ≤ 25% D 0 (1 + (MC / 100)) / 1 + (0.84 x D 0 (MC / 100)) k 0 (kcal m / h °C ) MC < 40% (R (1.39 + (0.028 x MC))) + 0.165 sealing (schedule) (mod / Vod) ((βv / FSP) m d (g) edw (g) preliminary data from Usta (2004) FSP (%), Volumetric shrinkage (βv, %) T&R d MC > 25% D 0 (1 + (MC / 100)) / 1 + (D 0 (FSP / 100)) MC ≥ 40% (R (1.39 + (0.038 x MC))) + 0.165 mk (g) m s (g) V d (cm 3) ((h 2 x L) / 2) treatment process MC (%) (full-cell process) ((mk / edw) - 1) x 100 P (%) (1 - (D MC / 1.5)) x 100 m t (g) NDS (kg m -3) blk. vol. (cm 3) ((DSR / Vd) x 1000) (P / 100) coefficient b uptake (g cm -3) MC / (1 – (270 x (D 0 / 1.5))) (FU / Vd) k (kcal m / h °CC ) k0 x (1 + (coefficient b x t)) VVF (%) (uptake / blk. vol.) x 100 DSR (g) (FU x (S / 100)) FU (g) (mt - ms) (mt - md) FR (g / g) (FU / md) Figure 2. A schematic representation of data assembly and the experimental processing. Citations of abbreviations and definitions used in this guide were shown sequentially on the base of the process. FSP (%), fibre saturation point; R (g cm-3), nominal density based on oven-dry weight and volume at the current moisture content; k0 (kcal m / h ºC), coefficient of thermal conductivity at 0 ºC; coefficient b, a proportionality coefficient related to the effect of density and moisture content (MC); k (kcal m / h ºC), coefficient of thermal conductivity by the effect of temperature; t (ºC), temperature; mx (g), the green mass; Vod (cm3), block volume after oven drying; mod (g), oven-dried mass; D0 (g cm3 ), oven-dry wood density; DMC (g cm-3), wood density at respective moisture contents (MC ≤ 25%, equal to-and/or-below 25 percent moisture content; MC > 25%, above 25 percent moisture content); P (%), porosity; blk. vol. (cm3), the amount of space available in a given block volume; iMC (%), initial moisture content; edw (g), estimated dry weight after kiln drying; mk (g), mass of the sample for control the current MC at regular intervals; MC (%), current moisture content at regular intervals during drying; Vd (cm3), block volume after kiln drying; md (g), mass after kiln drying (before treatment); ms (g), sealed mass; mt (g), mass after treatment process; FU (g), fluid uptake (the gross preservative solution absorption), FR (g/g), fluid retention (preservative retention on a whole-block basis); NDS (kg m-3), net dry salt absorbed after impregnation; DSR (g), dry salt retention on the base of its strength; S (%), strength of solution; uptake (g cm-3), dry salt loadings based on weight per volume; VVF (%), void volume filled by preservative solution. Thermal treatment process: Recent efforts concerning the thermal treatment of wood have led to the development of several new processes introduced on the European market during the last few years (e.g., Platoprocess (PLATO BV, the Netherlands), Ratification Process (NOW New Option Wood, France), Bois perdure (BCI-MBS, France), OHT-process (Oil-Heat Treatment, Menz-Holz, Germany), and Thermo-Wood process 308 (Stora, Finnforest, Finland)). These processes have in common the treatment of sawn wood at elevated temperatures in the range between 160 and 260 ºC. The main differences between the processes are to be seen in the process conditions (process steps, oxygen or nitrogen, steaming, wet or dry process, use of oils, steering schedules etc.) and they have been published in several patents (EP0018446, 1982; EP892031709, ‹. USTA 1989; EP0612595, 1994; EP0623433, 1994; EP0622163, 1994; EP0759137, 1995; US5678324, 1997). In comparison with the existing industrial processes overviewed, our thermal treatment process has been designed on a pilot scale with heating as the solution to lower temperatures. The treatment operation was carried out using a model pressure treatment plant according to BS 4072 (1987 part 2). The samples were treated with a 2% concentration of heated tanalith-C at 14 elevated temperatures from 5 to 70 °C, in addition to a non-heated (control) treatment, by a mild full-cell treatment schedule of 15 minutes vacuum (–0.84 bar) followed by pressure (1 bar) for 5 min. No final vacuum was used. A non-heated (control) treatment was also performed for comparisons. Each sample was weighed before and after a 5 min drip period following treatment to obtain the theoretically maximum possible solution uptake and dry salt absorption based on void volume (%) (McQuire, 1975). Results and Discussion k (Kcal m/h °C) Thermal conductivity: The coefficient of thermal conductivity (k) at elevated temperatures was calculated -3 based on R (0.368 g cm ) (Figure 3). It was observed that the coefficient of thermal conductivity at 0 ºC (k0, 2 kcal m / h ºC) was 0.109 (0.883 Btu in / h ft ºF) at 20% 2 MC and 0.153 (1.236 Btu in / h ft ºF) at 40% MC. Furthermore, the results indicate that k is a linear function of the temperature. When this relationship was established for each MC separately, there was a good 2 correlation (R = 1) between temperature and k (Figure 3). Let ki,j be the thermal conductivity at temperature i (ºC) and MC j (%). The extreme values were k5,20 = 0.110 and k5,40 = 0.157, and k70,20 = 0.130 and k70,40 = 0.211. The ratios k5,40/k5,20 and k70,40/k70,20 thus became 1.42 and 1.62, respectively. The following relationships are suggested: (y = 0.153 + 0.0041 x) for MC 40% and (y = 0.109 + 0.0015 x) for MC 20%. It should be noted that these experimental results show good agreement with data from the literature for a refractory softwood species (Steinhagen, 1977; Tsoumis, 1991). Although the thermal conductivity of Caucasian fir appeared to be fairly low at either MC level, we assume that these values reflected intrinsic information on the internal properties and fine structure of cell wall constituents of this species. This characteristic renders Caucasian fir eminently suitable for use in timber frame house construction, indoor panelling, and wall cladding and/or sheathing. In addition, Siau (1984) stated that the low conductivity of wood accounts for the considerable time interval required to bring a large-diameter pole or bolting to a uniform, elevated temperature by the application of heat to its external surfaces. Such unsteady-state heating is, therefore, an important part of wood treatment. Treatability by heated solution: The effects of temperature on the percentage of void volume filled (VVF%) with heated tanalith-C at different MC levels above and below the FSP are given in Table 1 for both triplex and transverse (T&R) flow, and changes in VVF% at the elevated temperatures from 5 to 70 ºC are shown in Figure 4. In general, the results showed that there are upward and downward trends in VVF% at the elevated temperatures at either MC level. All these trends indicated the dependence of permeability (fluid flow) on MC and partially on the temperatures. In regard to the elevated temperatures, the trends at the dry samples (at 20% MC) indicated a close relation to the VVF% variation pattern in 0.210 0.190 40% MC 0.170 20% MC 0.150 0.130 0.110 0.090 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Temperature (°C) 45 50 55 60 65 70 Figure 3. Evolution of the coefficient of transverse thermal conductivity in Caucasian fir above and below the fibre saturation point over the elevated temperature. MC: Moisture content 309 Evaluation of Thermal Treatability of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) Treated with Heated Tanalith-C of CCA above and below the Fibre Saturation Point 98 triplex flow all faces open VVF% 81 40% MC 64 20% MC 47 30 64 VVF% 56 transverse flow T&R 47 39 30 control 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Temperature (°C) 50 55 60 65 70 Figure 4. Changes in the percentage of void volume filled (VVF%) with heated preservative solution at elevated temperatures for triplex flow and transverse flow in 40% and 20% MC (moisture content). either flow direction. However, the trends of the wet samples (at 40% MC) did not show a specific pattern. As shown in Table 1, VVF% increased and reached a peak at around 30 ºC at both MC levels in each flow direction, after which it decreased either dramatically (at 40%) or slowly (at 20%) to around the level of the non-heated (control) samples. In type 2 (pattern of transverse -T&R- flow), VVF% at 40% MC decreased dramatically after 25 ºC and assumed lower values in comparison with those for 20% MC. In addition, the results of VVF% at the higher temperatures showed a similar pattern for either of these 2 MC levels, i.e. there were steady changes after 60 ºC, with narrow fluctuations at 40% MC. In addition, the VVF% variation at temperatures from 5 ºC to 25 ºC in transverse flow appeared to be always greater at 40% MC than at 20% MC, and reached the highest value at 25 ºC. This trend was also seen in triplex flow. According to Langrish and Walker (1993), this outstanding performance could be technically suitable and advantageous for thermal treatment in the artificial drying of green wood, where the rapid conduction of heat throughout the stack is essential. In type 3 (pattern of triplex flow), the VVF% variation at 20% MC showed trends similar to those observed for transverse flow. However, there was a different trend at 40% MC. The VVF% variation at 40% MC was initially consistent with the trends at 20% MC until 40 ºC, but after that it apparently decreased. It has been noted that the thermal treatability of Caucasian fir based on the trend of VVF% variations over the designed levels of temperature may be of 3 different types for either MC level in each flow direction (with a statistically significant difference at P < 0.05) (Figure 4). In type 1 (consistent with either flow direction), VVF% increased for temperatures increasing from 5 ºC to 25 ºC at 40% MC, and from 5 ºC to 30 ºC at 20% MC. In the case of the highest value, VVF% was numerically superior at 30 ºC in triplex flow, and at 35 ºC in transverse flow. 310 It is clear from Table 1 and Figure 4 that Caucasian fir has low thermal treatability features, especially in the transverse direction (perpendicular to the fibre axis), where there is high resistance to flow due to the interruption of the path by the poorly conducting airfilled lumens. Based on the VVF% with heated tanalith-C, it was observed that the greatest preservative uptake occurred at around 30 ºC in both transverse and triplex directions, and higher temperatures did not improve the uptake most likely due to the effects of vaporisation, particularly at higher MC (40%). This result indicates that heating the solution causes the air in the wood to expand and some of it is forced out. Consequently, 20% MC and temperature around 30 ºC (not less than 25 ºC and not ‹. USTA Table 1. Effect of temperature on the percentage of void volume filled (VVF%) with heated preservative solution in triplex and transverse (T&R) directions at 40% and 20% moisture content. Triplex flow Temperature (ºC) Control Transverse (T&R) flow 40% 20% 40% 20% 54.9 ± 0.16 a 59.3 ± 0.03 a 43.0 ± 0.99 a 40.1 ± 0.18 a 5 67.5 ± 1.09 b 68.0 ± 1.61 b 48.2 ± 0.24 b 41.7 ± 1.67 ab 10 74.6 ± 0.84 c 76.1 ± 0.67 c 53.3 ± 0.27 c 44.2 ± 0.85 b 15 91.3 ± 3.17 d 89.5 ± 211 d 56.5 ± 0.51 d 49.3 ± 0.28 c 20 95.2 ± 0.76 d 93.5 ± 2.09 d 59.9 ± 0.92 e 54.2 ± 0.23 dh 25 102.8 ± 0.08 e 99.3 ± 0.93 e 63.3 ± 0.30 f 57.6 ± 0.95 eg 30 103.0 ± 0.06 e 101.6 ± 0.99 e 55.5 ± 0.51 gcd 59.8 ± 1.31 ef 35 95.1 ± 0.07 d 97.1 ± 0.59 e 51.6 ± 0.58 hc 60.3 ± 0.32 f 40 93.3 ± 0.25 d 91.2 ± 1.08 d 49.8 ± 1.78 hib 59.4 ± 0.78 f 45 70.9 ± 2.40 fbc 90.4 ± 1.23 d 47.5 ± 0.51 ikb 58.4 ± 0.40 fg 50 64.4 ± 2.13 gb 83.7 ± 0.14 f 46.1 ± 0.94 k 54.4 ± 0.40 h 55 52.5 ± 2.36 a 73.4 ± 0.68 c 43.4 ± 1.46 ma 51.7 ± 0.74 i 60 47.4 ± 1.05 h 69.4 ± 0.40 b 41.9 ± 0.86 mna 48.9 ± 1.16 kc 65 46.6 ± 0.62 h 62.7 ± 3.41 ba 40.1 ± 1.05 np 48.1 ± 1.05 kc 70 46.4 ± 0.83 h 60.9 ± 1.69 a 39.9 ± 0.87 p 47.7 ± 1.73 kc Values shown are the means with the standard deviations of 4 replicates Means that are not significantly different at P < 0.05 level (Tukey comparison test) have the same letter in a given column. Control samples were treated with non-heated preservative solution more than 35 ºC) were highlighted as reliable specifications for heating the tanalith-C. These experimental findings provided important clues for the improvement of preservative uptake in Caucasian fir, which is a refractory softwood species, treated with heated tanalith-C. In the future, however, more detailed studies on this species at different experimental conditionsincluding the use of other preservative chemicalswill be necessary to identify efficient utilisation for the thermal treatment process. Conclusions This study has shown preservative uptake in Caucasian fira refractory speciescan be improved by heated tanalith-C (CCA) to make it more suitable for use with a mild thermal treatment process under the conditions of 20% MC and 30 ºC temperature. This application may provide new industrial uses in wood preservation. As the pipingfor transferring the heated preservative solution to the cylinderwas designed in this study without steaming, additional work on using steam piping between the tank and the cylinder is now under way. Laboratory studies will soon be performed in order to optimise the processing parameters and to evaluate the process economics. References BS 4072. 1987. Wood preservation by means of copper/chromium/arsenic compositions. Part 2: Method for timber treatment. British Standards Institute, London. Boonstra, M.J., B.F. Tjeerdsma and H.A.C. Groeneveld. 1998. Thermal modification of non-durable wood species. 1: The PLATO technology: Thermal modification of wood. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 98-40123. 311 Evaluation of Thermal Treatability of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) Treated with Heated Tanalith-C of CCA above and below the Fibre Saturation Point Burmester, A. 1973. Einflußn einer wärme-druck-behandlung halbtrockenen holzes auf seine formbeständigkeit, Holz als Rohund Werkstoff. 31: 237-243. Militz, H. and B. Tjeerdsma. 2000. Heat treatment of wood by the Plato process. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Production and Development of Heat Treated Wood in Europe, Helsinki. Deliinski, N. 1977. Berechnung der instatienären temperatureverteilung im holz bi der erwärmung durch wärmeleitung. Holz RohWerkstoff. 35: 141-145. Militz, H. 2002. Thermal treatment of wood: European processes and their background. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 02-40241. Desch, H.E. and J.M. Dinwoodie. 1996. Timber: structure, properties, conversion and use. MacMillan Press Ltd., London. Pratt, G.H. 1974. Timber drying manual. Building Research Establishment Report, Aylesbury. Dirol, D., B.F. Tjeerdsma and R. Guyonnet. 1993. The improvement of wood durability by retification process. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 93-40015. Rapp, A.O. and M. Sailer. 2000. Heat treatment of wood in Germany by the Plato process. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Production and Development of Heat Treated Wood in Europe, Helsinki. EP0018446. 1982. European patent: Verfahren zur vergütung von holz. EP892031709. 1989. European patent: Process for upgrading lowquality wood. EP0612595. 1994. European patent: Process for upgrading lowquality wood. EP0622163. 1994. European patent: Process for upgrading lowquality wood. EP0623433. 1994. European patent: Process for upgrading lowquality wood. EP0759137. 1995. European patent: Method for processing of wood at elevated temperatures. FPL. 1952. Computed thermal conductivity of common woods. U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, Technical Note: 248. Giebeler, E. 1983. Dimensionsstabilisierung von holz durch eine feuchte/wärme/druck-behandlung, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 41: 87-94. Hunt, G.M. and G.A. Garrett. 1967. Wood preservation. McGraw-Hill, New York. Jämsä, S. and P. Viitaniemi. 1998. Heat treatment of wood: better durability without chemicals. Nordiske Trebeskyttelsesdager. 4751. Kanter, K.R. 1957. The thermal properties of wood. Derev Prom. 6 (7): 17-18. Knigge, W. and H. Schulz. 1966. Grundriss der forstbenutzung. Parey, Hamburg. Kollmann, F. 1951. Technologie des holzes und der holzverkstoffe. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Kollmann, F.F.P. and W.A. Cote. 1968. Principles of Wood Science and Technology. I: Solid wood. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Langrish, T.A.G. and J.C.F. Walker. 1993. Transport processes in wood. In: Primary wood processing (Ed. J.C.F. Walker), Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, pp. 121-152. MacLean, J.D. 1941. Thermal conductivity of wood. Heating, Piping and Air Conditioning, 13 (6): 380-391. McQuire, A.J. 1975. Effect of wood density on preservative retention in fence posts. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 5(1): 105109. 312 Rapp, A.O., M. Sailer and M. Westin. 2000. Innovative holzvergütung – neue einsatzbereiche für holz. In: Proceedings of the DreiländerHolztagung, Luzern. Ratcliffe, E.H. 1964a. A review of thermal conductivity data. Wood. 29 (7): 49-51. Ratcliffe, E.H. 1964b. A review of thermal conductivity data. Wood. 29 (8): 46-49. Ratcliffe, E.H. 1964c. A review of thermal conductivity data. Wood. 29 (9): 50-54. Ruyter, H.P. 1989. Thermally modify wood. European patent. Application No: 89-2031709. Siau, J.F. 1984. Transport processes in wood. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Sova, V., D. Brenoerfer and G. Zlate. 1970. Zur Bestimung der thermischen eigenschaftn von ahornholz (Acer pseudeoplatunus L.). Holz Roh-Werkstoff. 28: 117-119. Stamm, A.J. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press Company, New York. Steinhagen, H.P. 1977. Thermal conductivity properties of wood. A literature review. U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, General Technique Report: 9. Syrjänen, T., S. Jämsä and P. Viitaniemi. 2000. Heat treatment of wood in Finland. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Production and Development of Heat Treated Wood in Europe, Helsinki. Tjeerdsma, B.F., M. Boonstra and H. Militz. 1998. Thermal modification of non-durable wood species. 2: Improved wood properties of thermally treated wood. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 98-40124. Tsoumis, G.T. 1991. Science and technology of wood: structure, properties, utilisation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. US5678324. 1997. United States patent: Method for improving biodegradation resistance and dimensional stability of cellulosic products. Usta, I. 2004. The effect of moisture content and wood density on the preservative uptake of Caucasian fir (Abies nordmanniana (Link.) Spach.) treated with CCA. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 28 (2004): 1-7. ‹. USTA Usta, I. and M.D. Hale. 2004. A novel guide for the determination of the physical properties of wood including kiln drying and full-cell preservative treatment. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 04-20298. Viitanen, H.A., S. Jämsä, L.M. Paajanen, A.J. Nurmi and P. Viitaniemi. 1994. The effect of heat treatment on the properties of spruce. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 9440032. Vernois, M. 2000. Heat treatment in France. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Production and Development of Heat Treated Wood in Europe, Helsinki. 313
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz