Kim Linenberger & Stacey Lowery Bretz April 23, 2013 1 Representation Misconceptions Electron-transport chain Citric acid cycle Immunoglobulin G Schonborn KJ, Anderson TR, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2006, 34, 94-102. Schonborn KJ, Anderson TR, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2002, 30, 93-97. 2 What are biochemistry students’ understandings of enzyme-substrate interactions? What do multiple representations reveal about students’ understanding of enzyme-substrate interactions? What misconceptions exist about enzymesubstrate interactions? How prevalent are the misconceptions that exist about enzyme-substrate interactions? Linenberger, Kimberly J. Biochemistry Students' Understandings of Enzyme-Substrate Interactions as Investigated through Multiple Representations and the Enzyme-Substrate Interactions Concept Inventory. Diss. Miami University, 2011. 3 Constructivism Knowledge constructed by learner Novak’s Theory of Meaningful Learning Meaningful material Learner disposition Relevant prior knowledge Coherence Formation between multiple representations Bodner, G.M., Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 1986, 63, 873-878 Bretz SL, “Novak’s Theory of Education: Human Constructivism and Meaningful Learning” Journal of Chemical Education. 2001, 78, Seufert, T. Learn. Instr., 2003, 13, 227-237. 4 Miami University IRB Approval Sampling (N=25) One semester survey course One semester of 2 semester series Adapted 3-Phase Single Interview Technique (3-PSIT) 4 Phases 1-Prior Knowledge 2-Representation 1 3-Representation 2 (Cognitive Dissonance) 4-Comparison & Reflection One interview per student (45-60 min) Audio & video recorded Code interviews using constant comparison method Linenberger K.L. and Bretz S.L. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2012, 13(3), pp 172-178. Linenberger, K.L. and Bretz, S.L. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 2012, 42(1), 21-25. Lincoln, Y. S.; Guba, E. G. In Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, Calif., 1985; pp 339-344. 5 Representation Set 1 Lock & Key vs. Induced Fit Representation Set 2 Trypsin Structure vs. Specificity Pocket Bloomfield M.M., Stephens, L.J. Chemistry and the Living Organism. 6th Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: United States, 1996; Pg 461. Silberberg, M.S. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change, 4th Ed; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 2006; pg 709. Voet, D.; Voet, J.G., Pratt, C.W. Fundamentals of Biochemistry: Life at the Molecular Level, 3nd Ed; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: United States, 2008; pg 351. 6 Multiple Choice Test Distracters are student misconceptions Written in student language Validity Biochemistry Expert Panel (N=10) Biology Concept Inventory Question Student Feedback Pilot Study 1 Institution (N=108) Revised and omitted questions MU-IRB & individual institution approval Informed consent Administered at least 2 weeks after exam on material Klymkowsky MW, Underwood, S, Garvin-Doxas K, 2010, arXiv:1012.4501v1; Gilbert, J.K. Res. Sci. Educ. 1977, 7, 165-171. ;Caleon, I.S.and Subramaniam, R. Int J. Sci. Educ. 2010, 32, 939-961.;Caleon, I.S.and Subramaniam, R. Res. Sci. Educ. 2010, 40, 313-337. 7 16 Institutions (N = 707) 78% White/Caucasian 57.3% Female 81.2% 3rd & 4th year Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 8 15 Items Mean = 8.32 ± 2.501 Kolmogorov-Smirnov D = 0.087 ρ < 0.001 Ferguson’s δ = 0.949 Cronbach α = 0.527 Test-Retest Stability Coefficient = 0.559 Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 9 Difficulty & Discrimination Distribution Item Discrimination 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Item Difficulty Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 0.8 1 10 Conformational change Enzyme and substrate characteristics Role of shape and charge in selectivity Competitive vs. noncompetitive inhibition How the enzyme interacts with the substrate Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 11 0MC 1% 5MC 22% 1MC 2% 2MC 12% 3MC 28% 4MC 35% Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 12 Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 13 (100) (142) (224) (41) (61) (139) χ2 (5, 707) = 97.687, p < 0.001 Bretz, S.L.; Linenberger, K.J. Biochem and Molec Bio Educ, 2012, 40(4), 229-233. 14 Students hold significant misconceptions of a basic underlying concept in biochemistry Creation of ESICI Based of a specific biochemical concept Derived entirely from students’ misconceptions Prevalent across diverse sample Linenberger, Kimberly J. Biochemistry Students' Understandings of Enzyme-Substrate Interactions as Investigated through Multiple Representations and the Enzyme-Substrate Interactions Concept Inventory. Diss. Miami University, 2011. 32 Prior Knowledge Biochemistry Curriculum Measure prior to instruction using ESICI Singly Clicker questions Together Linenberger, Kimberly J. Biochemistry Students' Understandings of Enzyme-Substrate Interactions as Investigated through Multiple Representations and the Enzyme-Substrate Interactions Concept Inventory. Diss. Miami University, 2011. 33 Use questions similar to those in interview What is relevant? Students Teacher What is conveyed vs. implied? How do representations correspond? In what ways do they differ? Linenberger, Kimberly J. Biochemistry Students' Understandings of Enzyme-Substrate Interactions as Investigated through Multiple Representations and the Enzyme-Substrate Interactions Concept Inventory. Diss. Miami University, 2011. 34 My participants Biochemistry Professors Expert Biochemist Panel Miami U. CER Division Dr. Stacey Lowery Bretz NSF: DRK-12 Award# 0733642 36
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz