Planning & Economic Development
February 27, 2016
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM
City Council Briefing Center
This meeting will be conducted in a standing committee format. Because a quorum of the City Council may be
present, the standing committee meeting will be conducted as a committee of the whole council.
The meeting will be open to the public, with the possibility of moving or reconvening into executive session only
with the members of the City Council and the appropriate staff. No legislative action will be taken. No public
testimony will be taken and discussion will be limited to appropriate officials and staff.
10:30
Call to Order
Approval of January 23, 2017 meeting minutes
Discussion Items:
10:30 - 10:40
10:40
10:50
10:55
11:10
-
10:50
10:55
11:10
11:15
1) University District Apartments-Projects of Citywide
Significance
2) Ridpath
3) CHHS RFP Cycle
4) Height Restriction on Spokane Falls Blvd.
5) MFTE Pence Townhouses
Andrew Worlock
Jonathan Mallahan
Dawn Kinder
CP Stuckart
Ali Brast
Administrative Reports/Standing Updates:
11:15 - 11:20
1) Traffic Calming Update
Heather Trautman
Adjournment:
Next Planning & Economic Development Meeting will be February 20, 2017
Executive Session: Executive Session may be held or reconvened during any Planning and Economic Development Committee Meeting
The password for City of Spokane Guest Wireless access has been changed:
Username: COS Guest
Password:
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) INFORMATION: The City of Spokane is committed to providing equal access to its facilities, programs and services
for persons with disabilities. The Spokane City Council Chamber in the lower level of Spokane City Hall, 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd., is wheelchair accessible
and also is equipped with an infrared assistive listening system for persons with hearing loss. Headsets may be checked out (upon presentation of picture I.D.)
at the City Cable 5 Production Booth located on the First Floor of the Municipal Building, directly above the Chase Gallery or through the meeting organizer.
Individuals requesting reasonable accommodations or further information may call, write, or email Human Resources at 509.625.6363, 808 W. Spokane Falls
Blvd, Spokane, WA, 99201; or [email protected]. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact Human Resources through the Washington
Relay Service at 7-1-1. Please contact us forty-eight (48) hours before the meeting date.
Planning & Economic Development
January 23, 2017
Meeting Minutes: Meeting called to order at 11:02
Attendance



P&ED Members Present: Council Members Mike Fagan, Breean Beggs, Lori Kinnear,
Candace Mumm, Karen Stratton, Amber Waldref
Council Members Not Present: Council President Ben Stuckart
Staff Present: Melissa Owen, Tirrell Black, Eldon Brown, Shauna Harshman, Alicia
Ayars, Amanda Winchell, Pam Bergin, Lisa Key, Dave Kokot, Boris Borisov, Teri Stripes,
Nathan Gwinn, Jo Anne Wright
Briefing Session:
Minutes from the November 21, 2016 meeting were approved unanimously.
Discussion Items:
1. Haven Street Vacation
Eldon Brown with Development Services Center presented on the application for the
vacation of a 12 foot portion of Haven Street between Rich and Heroy Avenue and a 12
foot portion of Market Street between Rockwell and Heroy Avenue.
Action Taken:
This project is in the Pre-Development stage, neighborhood response has not been
solicited yet. Planning department is working on gathering information from the
neighborhood plan and working with the developer to meet the Center and Corridor
landscaping standards.
2. Lincoln Heights District Center Plan
Tirrell Black with the Planning Department presented the Lincoln Heights Neighborhood
District Center Plan. This unique plan includes the neighborhood in its entirety, not just
the retail area.
Action Taken:
This item will be before council on February 6, 2017.
3. East Sprague BID Items
Melissa Owen with the Planning Department presented an update on the East Sprague
Business Improvement District including the 2017 assessment roll and clean-up of initial
ordinance.
Action Taken:
There is no Consumer Product Index (CPI) for the City of Spokane. Staff is
requesting an ordinance change to reference all urban and western region CPI. The
2017 ordinance changes are intended to create uniformity with all Business
Improvement District.
4. Housing Quality Task Force Report
Alicia Ayars with Neighborhood Services presented the Housing Quality Task Force
Report.
Action Taken:
Council Member Waldref has some suggested edits that will be included before it
goes to Council for Advanced Agenda. This item is currently scheduled for the
advanced agenda on January 30, 2017.
5. Plan Commission Work Plan
Council Member Mumm opened the discussion on the Plan Commission work plan.
Council would like to work with Plan Commission to establish a consistent priority list.
Council’s top three priorities consist of Comprehensive Plan Update, Comprehensive Plan
Update on Development Regulations and Six Year Transportation Plan.
Action Taken:
All three of the items selected by Council are mandates that are currently priority 1.
Council will be preparing a list of non-mandatory projects to prioritize.
6. Fire Code Amendments
Brian McClatchy with the Council Office advised Council that the International Fire Code
updates are not a development regulation issue. It was unnecessary for Staff to work
through the elongated public participation process. As a result Legal worked with staff to
add clarifying language in Code 17 to eliminate these types of codes from having to go
through the lengthier process.
Action Taken:
Next steps include adopting the code changes.
Administrative Reports:
1. Traffic Calming Update
Breean Beggs provided an update on Traffic Calming cost accounting across the
programs. The cost of the court commissioner and the neighborhood resource officer did
not get allocated across all programs. Staff is working on fixing any discrepancies.
Meeting Adjourned at 12:00 pm:
Next PED meeting is scheduled February 27, 2017
___________________________________
Council Member Candace Mumm, Chair
Return to Agenda
University District Apartments
Projects of Citywide Significance
Staff Report and Recommendation
January 31, 2017
Staff
Applicant
Andrew Worlock, Economic Development Section
Planning & Development Services Department
David Schneider
University Housing Partners
Authority
City of Spokane Administrative Policy and Procedure, Admin 0650-16-02
Projects of Citywide Significance Incentive Policy
Section 5.0 Policy: Individual projects which include new investment and physical improvements to real
property which equal or exceed $5 million in value can provide significant City wide public benefits. Such
public benefits include: bringing new living wage jobs to the community; generating new property, sales
and utility tax revenues; improving the community through the advancement or implementation of existing
community plans including the Comprehensive Plan and neighborhood plans; protecting or improving the
environment and conserving natural and historic resources; advancing State and regional industry cluster
growth and regional economic development plans; and investing in targeted investment areas such as
downtown Spokane, identified centers and corridors and target investment areas identified in the City’s
Economic Development strategy. In order to provide for an equitable and transparent process for the use
of financial incentives to encourage investments which provide significant public benefits to the City as
described above, the Spokane City Council has adopted Resolution 2015-0101 which provides for an
evaluation matrix allowing evaluation of a project’s public benefits which are reasonably likely to accrue
as a result of successful completion and intended operation of the project. The evaluation will be made
using the standardized evaluation matrix attached as exhibit “A” hereto in accordance with the policies
and procedures described herein.
Procedure:
6.1 Application: Application for a financial incentive will be made on forms provided by the City of
Spokane and shall contain all information and details required and necessary for a review of the project
and evaluation of the public benefits associated thereto.
6.2 Determination of Qualification: Within 10 business days of receipt of a complete application, the Staff
Technical Support Team will evaluate the application and make a determination that: the project is a
qualified project with a public benefit and may be considered for a financial incentive; that additional
information is needed to make the determination; or, that the project does not qualify for a financial
incentive under this program. Such determination will be made in writing.
6.3 Evaluation of Qualified Projects: Qualified projects will be forwarded to the Project Review Committee
for evaluation according to the evaluation matrix. The committee members will be provided copies of the
application and any supplemental information provided by the applicant and a technical memorandum
prepared by the Staff Technical Support Team. The report will include analysis of the project application
and assessment of the public benefits that may result. Each project review committee member will use
the application and technical memorandum to score the project against the evaluation matrix. The
committee member’s total scores will be summed and divided by the number of committee members
providing a score to determine the project’s average and final score.
-1-
6.4 Determination of Financial Incentive Value: The project’s total score and other relevant data will be
will be used to determine the financial incentive value based on the annually adopted project funding
schedule and subject to availability of funds at the time of award. Determination of financial incentive
value is not a guarantee of availability of funds or of an actual cash value of a project’s eligible public
improvement costs. Once a determination of financial incentive value is made, the determination and
project score are final.
6.5 Development Agreement: Upon completion of the determination of financial incentive value, the
project proponent and Staff Technical Support Team shall prepare a development agreement setting forth
the terms and conditions under which the financial incentive value will be applied to eligible public
improvements costs related to the project.
6.6 City Council Approval: The determination of financial incentive value and corresponding development
agreement shall have no force or effect whatsoever unless and until the development agreement is
approved by the Spokane City Council and signed by the Mayor.
Project Description
Please see applicant’s submittal information.
Location & Context
The University District Apartments project site is located on the east side of Division St. and the south
side of Spokane Falls Blvd. The property contains four parcels totaling approximately one acre including
an existing auto repair shop and parking lot. The site falls within the East Central neighborhood council
district. The properties across the street to the north are within the boundaries of the Logan
neighborhood council and properties across the street to the west are within the boundaries of the
Riverside neighborhood council. The property is within the University District Revitalization Area (UDRA).
A gateway is designated at the adjacent street intersection in the WSU campus master plan, which also
conceives of the area surrounding the site as being part of the “college town” district between Downtown
and the campus’s western edge, an area described as ideal for student-friendly retail, services, and
mixed-use development.
Artwork recently installed in the median triangle at Spokane Falls Boulevard and Division Street serves as
a gateway focal point.
Immediately south and west of the site is the East Downtown/West Main Character Area and East
Downtown Historic District In addition to the historic character and scale of buildings in this area, the
area is appreciated for modern green building practices. For example there are solar panels on Main
Market Co-op and the historic Saranac Hotel (a LEED Platinum Building). Other interesting
characteristics include roof top gardens, recycled building materials, stormwater capture and reuse, and
relatively wide planting areas.
Financial Partnership Portfolio Evaluation Matrix
Project Based Incremental Revenue
The three year total incremental revenue resulting from the project is estimated at $414,249. The
resulting category score is 15 points.
Job Creation
The completed project is expected to include 33 full time positions with 80 to 100% of those positions
paying an hourly wage equal to or greater than $15.00/hr. The resulting category score is 24 points.
-2-
Comp Plan, Design and the Environment
The project qualifies under the following criteria:
• Brownfield redevelopment
• Innovative or exemplary design
• Design includes enhanced public amenities
• Transit Oriented Development
• Mixed Use Development
• Mixed Income Development
• Blight removal
Total Category Score:
5 points
5 points
5 points
5 points
5 points
5 points
5 points
35 points
Industry Cluster Advancement
The applicant suggests that the building and the internal Courtyard will be used as a Welcome Center
and gathering location for students and visitors and with its ground floor restaurant and café space should
be an attraction for tourism. While these amenities are significant and provide public benefits which may
support the tourism, in staff’s opinion, they could not be considered as qualifying under this category. No
points were awarded in this category.
Geographic Priority Areas
The project is located in the Downtown Spokane and University District. The resulting category score is
10 points.
Special Considerations Bonus
Staff has considered the circumstances regarding this proposal and recommends an award of a
maximum of five (5) additional points under this category based on the costs associated with the
environmental remediation of the site which are nearly as much as the value of the property (2 ½ points).
In addition the project may incorporate smart city technologies and storm water systems (2 ½ points)
which are consistent with the UDistrict’s mission to advance innovative technologies.
Total Project Matrix Score: 89 points.
Incentive Value Calculations
The project’s total matrix score (89 points) and 3-year revenue return to the City ($414,249) are used to
calculate the incentive value for the project as shown in the table below. By scoring in the top category
the project warrants a base incentive of $100,000 plus 20% of the three year revenue ($82,850) for a total
incentive value of $182,850.
Values-Based Score
Revenue (3-Year) $
Point Score:
85+
70
55
40
<40
89
414,249
Base
Incentive
ROI
Multiplier
ROI-Based
Incentive
Total
Incentive
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$0
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
$82,850
$62,137
$41,425
$20,712
$0
$182,850
$142,137
$101,425
$60,712
$0
-3-
Recommendation
Staff finds that the project will provide significant public benefits as described in the application and
supplemental materials and therefore as a project of Citywide Significance warrants the City’s investment
of $182,850 towards public improvements pursuant to the Projects of Citywide Significance Incentive
Policy.
Upon the Project Review Committee’s final determination of project score and level of financial
partnership eligibility, staff and the project proponent will prepare a development agreement setting forth
the terms and conditions under which the financial incentive value will be applied to eligible public
improvements costs related to the project.
The final development agreement will be forwarded to the Spokane City Council for approval and
signature by the Mayor. The determination of financial incentive value and corresponding development
agreement shall have no force or effect whatsoever unless and until the development agreement is
approved by the Spokane City Council and signed by the Mayor.
-4-
Incentive Value Schedule w/Calculations
University District Apartments
Valuation
Annual Taxable Sales
Annual Utilities
Real Estate Purchase
Values‐Based Score
89
Revenue (3‐Year) $ 414,249
Point Score:
85+
70
55
40
<40
Base Incentive
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$0
ROI Multiplier
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
ROI‐Based Incentive
$82,850
$62,137
$41,425
$20,712
$0
Total Incentive
$182,850
$142,137
$101,425
$60,712
$0
Construction Sales Tax
RE Excise Tax
Annual Sales Tax
NC Property Tax
Annual Utility Tax
Inputs
$ 22,600,000
$ 4,250,000
$ 99,000
$ 2,700,000
1‐31‐17
Notes
Per proposal
Per proposal
Est. $50 per unit per month @165 units
Per proposal
Revenue Calculations
$ 189,840 Spokane portion
$ 13,500 Local portion
$ 35,700 Spokane portion
$ 14,803 Using 1/6 of the value due to assumed MFTE on residential portion
$ 19,800 20% of utility bill
3‐Year Total $ 414,249
Return to Agenda
PCED BRIEFING PAPER
City of Spokane
Community, Housing and Human Services
February 27, 2017
Subject
Ridpath Club Apartments Renovation and City financial support, including City
loan of up to $1,750,000.
Background
The Ridpath Club Apartments project includes the acquisition and renovation of
most of the former Ridpath Hotel (514 W 1st Ave) and adjacent building (502 W
1st Ave). The common address is 515 W. Sprague Ave. The 13-story Ridpath
Hotel (aka Ridpath Tower) was constructed as a luxury hotel in 1952 and the
adjacent 4-story “East Annex” building was constructed in 1906 as the St.
Nicholas Hotel, and later used by the YWCA, until it was combined with a
predecessor of the Ridpath Hotel in 1937. Over time, other buildings were
included in the Ridpath Hotel complex. The hotel closed in 2008, ownership of
the Tower and other related parcels was fractured, and various financial and
legal problems impeded development. Mr. Ron Wells and partners have worked
with prior owners, courts, lenders, and others to develop a plan and financing
package to redevelop two key parts of the prior hotel complex.
The Ridpath Club Apartments will include 102 “micro” apartments, 45 studio
apartments, 58 1-bedroom apartments, and a 2 bedroom apartment. (It will not
include condominium units on the Tower’s top 2 floors.) Plans for the Tower
include rental units, a parking garage, restaurant, residential common areas, and
management offices. The East Annex will have rental units, a fitness facility with
a pool, which was part of the St. Nicholas Hotel. The total development cost is
about $20.3 million. A 2014 as completed appraisal by Cushman and Wakefield
of Oregon gave an as-completed value of $14.1 million. An updated appraisal
has been ordered by a bank. (The renovation of the of the condominium units is
not part of this project and they are under separate ownership.)
The borrower will be the Ridpath Club Apartments, LLC or a related single asset
entity. The City’s loan is part of a financing structure that includes a construction
loan, bonds, equity from the sale of low-income housing tax credits and historic
tax credits, deferred developer fee loan, and a loan from the WA State Housing
Finance Commission (WSHFC). The specific details of the City’s loan are being
negotiated with the borrower and the WSHFC. The City loan documents will be
presented to Council for approval when they are complete. The WSHFC is
expected to give its final approval of bonds, low-income housing tax credits, and
For further information contact: Jonathan Mallahan, [email protected], (509) 625-6734
Page 1
March 2, 2015
$2 million loan at its scheduled meeting on 4/27/17. The financing is expected to
close between March and May 2017, work should begin shortly thereafter, and
take about a year to complete. Unit leasing will begin on a floor-by-floor basis
during construction.
Impact
The renovation will transform two long-vacant buildings in the heart of Downtown
Spokane with 206 rental housing units, a restaurant, a fitness center, and other
commercial space. The streetscape improvements include sidewalks and street
trees.
Action
Before June, the final loan documents will be submitted for City Council approval.
Funding
City loan funding is from accumulated program income from the closed federal
Rental Rehabilitation Program. City staff is exploring the applicability of other
City development incentives.
For further information contact: Jonathan Mallahan, [email protected], (509) 625-6734
Page 2
March 2, 2015
RIDPATH CLUB APARTMENTS
515 W SPRAGUE AVE
DRAFT BUDGET
Acquisition
$4,740,000
Construction
5,294,089
Sales tax
502,896
Other hard costs
1,048,379
Hard cost contingency 1,022,305
Architect
444,973
Construction interest
901,336
Misc financing fees
782,002
Misc legal fees
671,000
Repayment of WSHFC
967,055
Other costs
347,849
Comm’l tenant improvmnts 150,000
Reserves
720,000
Developer fees
_2,539,974
$20,256,858
Net investor equity
$5,325,000
Permanent loan
8,075,000
WA State Housing Finance
Commission loan
2,000,000
Def developer fee loan
1,889,703
Gen’l Partner LLC loan
500,000
Gen’l Partner equity
100
Net operating income during
construction
717,055
City loan
1,750,000
__________
$20,256,858
Return to Agenda
For further information contact: Jonathan Mallahan, [email protected], (509) 625-6734
Page 3
March 2, 2015
Return to Agenda
BRIEFING PAPER
City of Spokane
MFTE Incentive Program / PED
February 27, 2017
Subject:
A Multi-Family Tax Exemption Conditional Contract for 15 units across two multi-family buildings at 618 S Ivory.
Purpose:
Chapter 84.14 RCW authorizes the City to create a multiple family housing property tax exemption program and to certify
qualified property owners for that property tax exemption. The City Council enacted Ordinance No. C-32575, which
provides for the property tax exemption program for multiple housing in residential targeted areas. Pursuant to Ordinance
No. C-33079, the City Council expanded the residential targeted areas. The State statute and the City ordinance require
the City to approve the application regarding the tax exemption and the necessary construction requirements. The City
has received an application from Pence Properties for a project of 15 multi-family housing units across two buildings at
618 S Ivory. The staff has reviewed the application and determined that it meets the requirements of Chapter 8.15 SMC
and qualifies for the tax exemption. This contract authorizes the appropriate city official to enter into the attached Multiple
Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement, which will ultimately result in the issuance of a final certificate of tax
exemption to be filed with the Spokane County Assessor’s Office.
Details:
Pence Properties
MFTE target area: Lower South Hill
Qualifying parcel: 35201.6504, 35201.6503, 35201.6502, and 35201.6501
Units: 15 units
Average Sq Ft: 1,020 sqft
STA Routes: 2 blocks from Route 45 and Bus Stops
Affordable: Market Rate
Projected Foregone Tax Revenue over 8 Years: $38,345
Project Area Map:
For more information contact: Ali Brast, 509-625-6638, [email protected]
Planning & Development Services Department
Tax Abatement Information:
Applicant's Project Assumptions: To estimate the value of Celesta and Ivory I utilized another
properties accessed value that Pence Properties owns at 2101 N. Washington parcel 35074.2211.
This property is a 4-plex and it is accessed at $287000. Divided by four the value for each unit would
be $71750. The Washington 4 plex is identical to the construction, and fit in finish to the units being
built at Celesta and Ivory only smaller in number. The Washington 4plex was built in 2011.
So in taking the $71750 and multiplying it by the 15 proposed units the value of the project should
be close to $1,076,000.
Celesta and Ivory
Applicant’s estimated post construction Market Value
2017 City’s tax rate of 4.30
1% increase in property value over 8yrs
Estimate City of Spokane tax not collected over 8 yrs.
Unit MV
$ 71,750
MV Project
$
1,076,250
Spokane '16
TCA10-15
Rate
Property
Increase
in value
City
Tax Forgone
0.0043
89,175
38,345
Celesta and Ivory
# of Yrs.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Taxable Value Annual increase increase in value
1,076,250
1%
10,763
1,087,013
1%
10,870
1,097,883
1%
10,979
1,108,861
1%
11,089
1,119,950
1%
11,200
1,131,150
1%
11,311
1,142,461
1%
11,425
1,153,886
1%
11,539
Spokane '17 Spokane property
TCA10-15
tax not collected
0.0043
4,628
0.0043
4,674
0.0043
4,721
0.0043
4,768
0.0043
4,816
0.0043
4,864
0.0043
4,913
0.0043
4,962
89,175
38,345
Recommendation:
Pursuant to SMC 08.15.060, the city council certifies the qualified property owner for this property tax
exemption. This contract will be brought forward to City Council in the next few weeks.
Return to Agenda
For more information contact: Ali Brast, 509-625-6638, [email protected]
Planning & Development Services Department
Traffic Calming Budget Analysis
2/21/2017
FY 2015 (Revenue & Expenses) Actual Activity
Revenue
Cash Balance 12/31/14
2015 Photo Red Revenue
FY 2016 (Revenue & Expenses) Actual & Projected
$1,999,985
$1,467,552
Total Cash Available
FY 2017
FY 2018
2016 Photo Red Revenue Actual 12/12/16
$1,680,531
2017 Photo Red Estimated Revenue
$1,500,000
Unspent Less Commitments
in 2015
$1,320,580
Unspent Less Commitments in 2016
$869,023
$3,467,537 Total Cash Available
$3,001,111 Total Cash Available
2018 Photo Red Estimated Revenue
Unspent Less Commitments in
2017
$2,369,023 Total Cash Available
$1,500,000
$708,123
$2,208,123
Expenses
ATS Contract
Officer Salary & Benefits
Street Dep. Work
Reprographics & Envelopes
Postage
Misc
$614,192
$131,413
$7,517
$47,586
$8,832
$1,876
Expenses Actual
ATS Contract
Officer Salary & Benefits
Street Dep. Work
Reprographics & Envelopes
Postage
MuniCourt Charges
1/2 FTE Comm. Prog. Cord.
Salary & Benefits
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
$617,968
$107,155
$4,715
$63,414
$10,765
$23,275
Actual
$13,562
Expenses (budgeted - 2017)
ATS Contract
Officer Salary & Benefits
Street Dep. Work
Reprographics & Envelopes
Postage
Misc.
1/2 FTE Comm. Prog. Cord. Salary & Benefits
$622,400
$135,000
$2,000
$40,000
$10,000
$13,000
$45,000
Expenses (budgeted - 2018)
ATS Contract
Officer Salary & Benefits
Street Dep. Work
Reprographics & Envelopes
Postage
Misc.
1/2 FTE Comm. Prog. Cord. Salary & Benefits
$622,400
$135,000
$2,000
$40,000
$10,000
$13,000
$45,000
Office Salary & Benefits (Est)2nd 1/2 yr
Total expenses
Traffic
Calming
Expenses
$811,416 Total Expenses (Budgeted 2016)
Cross Walk at Mission & Hamilton
$16,520
$840,853 Total Expenses (Budgeted 2017)
Accounting
Actual
$6,463
School Zone Flashing Light
$7,656
Audit Charges
Actual
$736
Accounting
$3,407
2 Speed Radar Trailers
Actual
$15,382
$867,400 Total Expenses (Budgeted 2018)
Accounting
$5,000
Audit Charges
$1,000
Actual FY to Date:
Accounting
$867,400
$5,000
Cycle 6 - Design / Construction / CM
District 1
$193,509
District 1
Actual
$166,988
District 1
$65,000
District 2
$567,439
District 2
Actual
$176,954
District 2
$164,000
District 3
$378,737
District 3
Actual
$240,683
District 3
Proir Year Design Costs
Total District Expense
$1,167,268 Total District Expenses (Actual)
Prior Years Projects Still oustanding
Traffic Calming Cycle 3
Traffic Calming Cycle 4** as of 9/14/16
$0 **
$68,274
Traffic Calming Cycle 5 -Phase 1 (12) Projects
Cycle 5 Construction Management (15%)
Total Cycle 6
$607,207
$594,993
$89,249
Traffic Calming Cycle 5 Remaining (6) projects
Cycle 7 Design
Total Outstanding
$68,274 Total Outstanding Cycle 5 & 6
$27,529
Cycle 6 Design
$711,771 Total Cycle 5 & Cycle 6 Design
$263,000
$535,000
Still out
Magnesium 20 When Flashing - Cycle 5
Four 20 When Flashing Ridgeview Elem - Cycle 6
Two 20 when Flashing Lewis & Clark HS - Cycle 6
Purchased 8 lights Actual Costs
$64,000
-$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$571,000 Total Cycle 6 & Cycle 7 Design
$298,000
Commitments
Operating tansfer Traffic Cop
$100,000
Reverse Operating Transfer from 2015
Oper Ttr to Traffic Cop
Total Council Commitments
Cash Avail for FY 2016
$100,000 Total Council Commitments
$1,320,580 Cash Avail for FY 2017
-$100,000
$72,257
Speed Radar Trailers & Maintenance
Oper Ttr to Traffic Cop
Traffic
50% Muni Court Commissioner
Funding of CPC in CNS Division Budget
$20,000
$100,000
$62,500
$40,000
Speed Radar Trailers & Maintenance
Oper Ttr to Traffic Cop
Traffic
50% Muni Court Commissioner
$20,000
$100,000
$62,500
-$27,743 Total Council Commitments
$222,500 Total Council Commitments
$182,500
$869,023 Cash Avail for FY 2018
$708,123 Cash Avail for FY 2019
$860,223
School Radar Budget Analysis w/ Traffic Claming Subcommittee recommendations
2/21/2017
FY 2016 (Revenue & Expenses) Actual & Projected
FY 2017
FY 2018
Revenue
2016 School Radar Revenue Actual 12/31/16
Total Cash Available
$1,271,770
2017 School Radar Estimated Revenue
Unspent Less Commitments in 2016
$1,271,770 Total Cash Available
$1,048,000
$1,159,866
2018 School Radar Estimated Revenue
Unspent Less Commitments in 2017
$1,048,000
$1,241,826
$2,207,866 Total Cash Available
$2,289,826
Expenses
Actual Expenses (2016)
ATS Contract 10/31/16
Misc. Sewer Maint Charges
Poles for Beacons
Total Estimated Expenses
School
$104,748
$3,360
Expenses (budgeted - 2017)
ATS Contract
50% Muni Court Commissioner
$105,600
$62,500
$105,600
$62,500
$3,796
$111,904 Total Expenses (Budgeted 2017)
$168,100 Total Expenses (Budgeted 2018)
Pittsburg/Sanson/North Sidewalk
$247,940
Hartson/Rebecca Ped Crossing
33rd Ave. Alley (east manito Blvd.)
17th Ave. at Franklin Elem. - 20mph When Flashing
Total Cycle 5 Traffic Calming School Projects
$168,100
Cycle 6 School projects - Design/Construction/ CM/Contingency
Cycle 5 School Projects - Design/Construction/CM/Contingency
Projects
Expenses (budgeted - 2018)
ATS Contract
50% Muni Court Commissioner
$47,150
$6,900
$43,700
Longfellow/Oak Island
$86,250
Driscoll/Olympic Sidewalk
$36,800
$247,940 Total Cycle 6 Traffic Calming School Projects
$220,800
Commitments
Resource Officers
Patrol
$0 Total Council Commitments
Cash Avail for FY 2017
$1,159,866 Cash Avail for FY 2018
Return to Agenda
$550,000
Resource Officers
$550,000 Total Council Commitments
$1,241,826 Cash Avail for FY 2019
Patrol $550,000
$550,000
$1,350,926