Community Schools: A Strategy, Not a Program Jane Quinn & Janice Chu-Zhu National Center for Community Schools The Children’s Aid Society “Could someone help me with these? I’m late for math class.” Scott Spencer Definitions 1 A Strategy for What? “A strategy for organizing the resources of the school and community around student success…” Patricia Harvey, Former Superintendent St. Paul Public Schools What is a Community School? A community school is both a place and a set of partnerships between the school and other community resources. Its integrated focus on academics, services, supports and opportunities leads to improved student learning, stronger families and healthier communities. Coalition for Community Schools CAS Developmental Triangle Community Family Child COMPREHENSIVE SUPPORT SERVICES 2 A Closer Look Key Characteristics Education First Lead Agency as Partner, Not Tenant Full-Time Presence of Lead Agency Joint Planning (Particularly between Principal and Coordinator) Integration of Partners into Governance and Decision-Making Bodies (e.g., School Leadership Team, Child-Study Team) Key Programmatic Components Expanded Learning Opportunities Parent Engagement & Involvement Adult Education Medical, Dental, Mental Health and Social Services Early Childhood Community and Economic Development 3 Results of CAS Community Schools Improved academic performance Higher attendance rates Positive school climate Improved school safety Greater parent involvement Improved student-teacher relationships Teachers able to focus on education A National Movement National Movement National Coalition for Community Schools founded in 1998 Cities and districts begin “going to scale” Community school approach embedded in Promise Neighborhoods, Collective Impact initiatives Community school language emerging in federal policy (Title I, Turnaround) 4 Several well-known models: Beacons Bridges to Success Children’s Aid Society Communities in Schools Healthy Start Polk Brothers Full-Service Schools Schools of the 21st Century (Yale University) WEPIC (University of Pennsylvania) Underlying Research Base Making the Most of Non-School Time • Reginald Clark • Milbrey McLaughlin • Deborah Vandell Whole Child Approach/ Application of Developmental Knowledge • Jacquelynne Eccles • James Comer Parents’ Active Role • Joyce Epstein • A. Henderson & K. Mapp Coordinated Services • Joy Dryfoos Health-Learning Links • Charles Basch Consistent Adult Guidance & Support • Werner/Benard • Fritz Ianni Newer Research New research from Chicago (Bryk et al.) found five essential ingredients: Principal: driver of change; inclusive leadership approach Real family and community engagement Ability to build professional capacity Student-centered school climate Coherent curriculum 5 New Research on Links between Health and Educational Achievement Charles Basch identified causal links between 7 health issues and educational achievement: 1. Poor vision 2. Asthma 3. Teen Pregnancy 4. Aggression and Violence 5. Physical Inactivity 6. ADHD 7. Hunger (especially insufficient breakfast) Basch observes: While it is not new that these health problems disproportionately affect urban minority youth, what Basch documented is that these disparities “have direct causal links to motivation and ability to learn through affecting children’s sensory perceptions, cognition, connectedness and engagement in school.” Simply put, healthy students are better learners. In addition… Basch further observes that efforts to close the achievement gap have focused on curricular reforms, teacher and leadership development, and strengthened accountability measures. While there has been much rhetoric around incorporating health programs into schools, these programs have not—for the most part— been done in strategic, high quality or coordinated way. 6 Results of Mature Community School Initiatives Improved academic performance – reading and math Improved student and teacher attendance Reduced dropout rates and higher graduation rates Improved behavior Gains in indicators of positive youth development, such as leadership and conflict resolution skills Greater parent involvement Community benefits, such as better use of public buildings and safer neighborhoods Coalition for Community Schools Key Lessons from Mature Community School Initiatives Successful systems pay attention to: Shared vision and results Supportive policy and innovative financing Effective leadership Broad community support Stable and flexible systems Lessons about Leverage Non-education dollars from multiple sources can be leveraged to add value to the work of schools, in schools The CS strategy can add both human and financial resources to schools U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan calls CS “the most highly leveraged dollars I spent in Chicago” 7 Changes in CS Practice over 20 Years Where we were then: Co-Location CBOs as vendors Wrap-around (services, often around fixing kids) Program centered Time-limited project Innovators developing one or a few schools Where we are now: Integration CBOs as partners SOS: Supports, services, opportunities Child centered Long-term strategy Developing systems of community schools From Pilot to Policy Examples of Policy Change Hartford, CT: Board of Education passed a policy that emphasized a welcoming attitude combined with requirements about alignment Multnomah County, OR: An explicit policy framework drove subsequent funding decisions (toward schools as service hubs) Kent County, MI: Redeployed County DFS workers from central office into school sites 8 More Examples of Policy Change Bernalillo County, NM: Developed a joint powers agreement among the city, school district and county government; leaders meet monthly to align policies and funding Cincinnati, OH: All major players agreed to share data; all major funders agreed to support Community Learning Centers New York State: Education Reform Commission recommendations led to development of community schools funding Capacities & Stages Critical Capacities Effective community schools continually develop a set of four key capacities: 1. Comprehensiveness 2. Collaboration 3. Coherence 4. Commitment 9 1. Comprehensiveness Programs, services and opportunities respond to a wide spectrum of identified needs by marshalling a full complement of partnership resources Whole Child Developmental Approach Needs Assessment & Resource Allocation Asset-based, High-quality Program Development Test Score Achievement Gap: Beginning School Study Verbal CAT by Season & SES (Johns Hopkins) 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 Fall 1 Spring 5 Low SES High SES 10 Test Score Achievement Gap: Beginning School Study Verbal CAT by Season & SES (Johns Hopkins) 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 Low SES High SES 2. Collaboration All stakeholders are involved in meaningful, permanent roles – including educators, parents, students, funders, community members, elected officials, providers, policymakers, etc. Engagement Partnership Development Shared Leadership “Collaboration has been defined as an unnatural act between non-consenting adults. We all say we want to collaborate, but what we really mean is that we want to continue doing things as we have always done them, while others change to fit what we are doing.” Jocelyn Elders Former US Surgeon General 11 Collaboration - What is it? Collaboration is the highest form of partnership It entails multiple partners who care about a community or an issue Partners come together and examine their own systems and interrelationships while learning from each other’s views Systemic Community Schools Initiative Structure Leadership Team • Shared Vision • Policy Alignment • Resource Development Mayor/County Executive, District Superintendent, City/County Agency Directors, Major Donors, Lead Agency Executives, Electeds Business Partners Intermediary / Management Team • Partner Coordination • Protocol Development • Data Sharing & Analysis Site-Based Team Evaluation • Needs Assessment • Implementation • Outcomes Capacity Building City/County Agency Managers, District Ass’t Superintendents, Site Supervisors, Program & Service Provider Managers Principal, Assistant Principal, Community School Coordinator, Teachers, Providers, Parents, Community Members 3. Coherence Programs, services and opportunities are integrated and aligned to achieve outcomes beyond the reach of any one entity Program Integration and Oversight School/Partner Relationships Coordination 12 Chronic Absence Chronic absence occurs when students miss 10% or more days (about a month) in a school year including excused and unexcused absences. National research found that this level of school absence was associated with lower academic performance, truancy, dropping out, delinquency and substance abuse. Hedy Chang ELA Students Chronically Absent in K & 1st Grade Much Less Likely to Read Proficiently in 3rd Grade % Proficient or Advanced on 3rd Grade 100% 80% 64% 60% 43% 41% 40% 17% 20% 0% No attendance risks Small attendance Moderate High attendance risks attendance risks risks Risk level, according to K & 1st Grade absences 38 Source: Applied Survey Research & Attendance Works (April 2011) ADA & Chronic Absence in one NYC Network’s middle schools 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 ADA 6 7 8 9 CA 13 4. Commitment All partners view the CS as a long-term strategy, not a program, and sustainability planning activities are employed from the start Shared Vision and Results Framework Building Public Will and Participation Strategic Financing Evaluation and Capacity-Building Stages of Development in a Community School Exploring Emerging Maturing Excelling 14 Our Three Mantras It’s all about relationships Everything has to be negotiated—all the time For community schools to work, the partners have to have the word “yes” written in their hearts nationalcenterforcommunityschools.org [email protected] 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz