Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F459 –F469, 2009. First published October 29, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90340.2008. Review Role of N-glycosylation in trafficking of apical membrane proteins in epithelia Olga Vagin,1,2 Jeffrey A. Kraut,2,3,4 and George Sachs1,2 1 Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California; 2Membrane Biology Laboratory, University of California; 3Division of Nephrology, Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Health Care System; and 4David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California Submitted 2 June 2008; accepted in final form 27 October 2008 apical sorting; apical membrane retention; H-K-ATPase -subunit; lectin vectorial transport that requires polarized distribution of transporters and receptors to apical or basolateral membrane domains. These domains are separated by tight junctions that connect neighboring cells in the epithelial monolayer and act as diffusion barriers to prevent mixing of apical and basolateral membrane components (22). Asymmetric distribution of plasma membrane proteins is accomplished by their sorting into apical and basolateral containers in the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and/or endosomes followed by vectorial transport of these containers and insertion and retention of the proteins in the appropriate plasma membrane domains. Sorting depends on recognition of apical and basolateral sorting signals within the proteins by cellular sorting machinery (20, 58, 59, 75, 76). Numerous studies have indicated that both O- and N-glycans attached to the extracellular domains of some membrane proteins are important for apical location of these proteins. This review will focus on the role of N-glycans in polarized distribution of plasma membrane proteins in epithelia. The role of O-glycans in apical sorting has been described in several recent excellent reviews (18, 71) and will not be discussed further here. A putative role of N-glycans as apical sorting signals was postulated more than 10 years ago (24, 31). However, this hypothesis remains controversial primarily because N-glycans EPITHELIAL CELLS CARRY OUT Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: O. Vagin, Dept. of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at Univ. of California, Bldg. 113, Rm. 324, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073 (e-mail: olgav @ucla.edu). http://www.ajprenal.org are important for the processes that precede or follow the actual sorting event, such as protein folding, quality control, endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation, ER-to-Golgi trafficking, and retention of glycoproteins in the apical membrane. Therefore, merely examining the effect of altering the number or the nature of N-linked glycans on the relative abundance of the glycoprotein in the apical membrane, as has been done in many of the studies reported, does not allow one to distinguish between effects on apical sorting and these other processes. Additionally, the mechanisms by which sorting information encoded by N-glycans is recognized by cellular sorting machinery have not been defined. Two lectins have been identified as potential sorting receptors that recognize N-glycans as apical sorting signals (15, 17, 34, 35). However, it is not clear how glycan-lectin interactions that must occur in the luminal compartments of TGN/endosomes are converted into a cascade of cytoplasmic events resulting in apical delivery of N-glycosylated proteins. In the present review, we discuss the roles of N-glycans in apical sorting and the processes that precede and follow this event. Furthermore, we summarize the evidence for the importance of glycoprotein clustering in membrane microdomains and putative roles of glycan-binding proteins in apical distribution of N-glycosylated proteins. Normal N-Glycosylation of Membrane Proteins All membrane glycoproteins are synthesized by ribosomes attached to the ER and become inserted into the ER membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. Glycoproteins acquire the N-linked glycans during the process of transF459 Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 Vagin O, Kraut JA, Sachs G. Role of N-glycosylation in trafficking of apical membrane proteins in epithelia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F459 –F469, 2009. First published October 29, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90340.2008.—Polarized distribution of plasma membrane transporters and receptors in epithelia is essential for vectorial functions of epithelia. This polarity is maintained by sorting of membrane proteins into apical or basolateral transport containers in the transGolgi network and/or endosomes followed by their delivery to the appropriate plasma membrane domains. Sorting depends on the recognition of sorting signals in proteins by specific sorting machinery. In the present review, we summarize experimental evidence for and against the hypothesis that N-glycans attached to the membrane proteins can act as apical sorting signals. Furthermore, we discuss the roles of N-glycans in the apical sorting event per se and their contribution to folding and quality control of glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum or retention of glycoproteins in the plasma membrane. Finally, we review existing hypotheses on the mechanism of apical sorting and discuss the potential roles of the lectins, VIP36 and galectin-3, as putative apical sorting receptors. Review F460 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS contains five mannose residues. Following the addition of GlcNAc and further mannose trimming, GnT-II catalyzes formation of the complex-type N-glycans in which GlcNAc is substituted for both ␣3- and ␣6-linked mannose residues. The actions of GnTs-III, -IV, -V, and -VI underlie the variability in the number of branches in N-glycans: GnTs-IV, -V, and -VI promote branching of N-glycans, whereas GnT-III stops branching. The latter enzyme adds the bisecting GlcNAc to hybrid or complex N-glycans that prevents the downstream action of the branching enzymes (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Many of the other glycosyltransferases, which compete with each other for the N-glycan substrate in the trans-Golgi, facilitate elongation of the GlcNAc-substituted chains by adding various monosaccharides. Thus individual branches of the mature N-glycan can vary in both their length and carbohydrate composition. Most frequently, individual branches are elongated by addition of galactose and sialic acid residues catalyzed by galactosyltransferases and sialyltransferases. Individual branches can also be elongated by addition of multiple sialic acid residues or polylactosamine sequences (series of repeated galactose-GlcNAc disaccharides). The diversity of N-glycans in various glycoproteins is a result of the interplay of several factors. The particular set of glycosyltransferases expressed in a specific cell type is one of the most important. This difference in expression of glycosyltransferases likely explains the finding that N-glycans of Fig. 1. Simplified schema showing the pathways and enzymes involved in synthesis of high-mannose, hybrid, and complex N-glycans in the Golgi. High-mannose N-glycans imported from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi can remain unchanged or can undergo various transformations under the influence of Golgi mannosidases and glycosyltransferases. Six different N-acetylglucosamine-glycosyltransferases (GnTs) present in the Golgi (I–VI) can add N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues to the 3-mannosyl core of N-glycans (green rectangle) and thereby produce diverse carbohydrate structures. The addition of GlcNAc residues by GnT-I, -II, -IV, -V, and -VI, but not by GnT-III, allows elongation of the chains, referred to as “antennae.” Elongation of the chains is accomplished by addition of monosaccharide linkages catalyzed by other various glycosyltransferases (dashed arrows). GnT-I is a critical regulatory enzyme for formation of both hybrid and complex-type N-glycans. GnT-II acts downstream of GnT-I to catalyze the formation of the complex-type N-glycans. GnTs-IV, -V, and -VI promote branching of N-glycans by adding GlcNAc into the positions shown by different shades of blue. Individual N-glycans can be modified by one or more of these enzymes, resulting in N-glycans that contain from 1–5 antennae. In contrast, GnT-III (red) stops branching by adding a bisecting GlcNAc to any of the N-glycans, thereby preventing the downstream action of GnTs-II, -IV, -V, and -VI. In the example depicted, the effect of this enzyme on the product of GnT-I results in the formation of a 1-antennary N-glycan of the hybrid type. Branching also can be prevented by exposure of cells to inhibitors of the Golgi mannosidase I and II, deoxymannojirimycin (dMM) and swainsonine, resulting in preservation of the high-mannose or hybrid-type structure of N-glycans, respectively. A modified version of this figure is in Ref. 89. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 location and elongation of the polypeptide chain. First, while the protein continues to be associated with the translocon, a 14-saccharide core is transferred from the dolichol phosphate precursor to the N-glycosylation site of the nascent membrane protein, an asparagine (Asn) residue within a consensus sequence of Asn-X-Thre/Ser (X is any amino acid residue except Pro). Next, terminal glucose residues of this core are trimmed by ER glucosidases. Then, after removal of one mannose residue by the ER ␣-mannosidase I, the glycoproteins are exported to the Golgi. Some glycoproteins that are trafficked to the plasma membrane move through the Golgi and post-Golgi vesicular compartments to this destination without further processing. These glycans are high-mannose N-glycans (Fig. 1). However, the structure of the majority of N-glycans is altered further in the Golgi. After removal of one, two, or three mannose residues by Golgi mannosidases, various glycosyltransferases catalyze branching and elongation of the carbohydrate chains, producing hybrid or complex N-glycans (Fig. 1 and Table 1) (1, 39). This rebuilding of the N-glycans is initiated by addition of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues to the N-glycan core structure by one or more of the six different N-acetylglucosamine-glycosyltransferases (GnTs) located in the cis-Golgi and medial Golgi. GnT-I initiates formation of hybrid N-glycans by attachment of GlcNAc to the ␣3 arm of the core at the stage when the core Review F461 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS Table 1. Roles of N-glycan-specific enzymes in processing and maturation of membrane glycoproteins Enzyme Location Effect Glucosidases ER ␣-Mannosidases I GnT-I GnT-I, Golgi ␣-mannosidase II and GnT-II GnT-IV GnT-IV, GnT-V, and GnT-VI GnT-III Sialyltransferase, galactosyltransferases, and other glycosyltransferases ER and Golgi Medial Golgi Medial Golgi Medial Golgi Medial and trans-Golgi Medial and trans-Golgi Medial and trans-Golgi Removal of terminal glucose residues from oligosaccharide core and formation of high-mannose glycoproteins Trimming of high-mannose N-glycans Formation of hybrid-type glycoproteins Formation of complex-type glycoproteins Branching of N-glycans in hybrid-type glycoproteins Branching of N-glycans in complex-type glycoproteins Prevention of branching of N-glycans Elongation of branches in hybrid and complex N-glycans ER, endoplasmic reticulum. Role of N-Glycans in Protein Folding, Stability, and Quality Control in the ER Folding of proteins in the ER is initiated cotranslationally and is completed posttranslationally. Heat shock proteins, such as GRP78/BIP, act as chaperones facilitating the normal folding of proteins and their delivery from the ER to the Golgi. However, N-linked glycans also play a major role in folding and quality control of newly synthesized glycoproteins, helpAJP-Renal Physiol • VOL ing to ensure that only properly folded proteins are delivered from the ER to the Golgi and thence to their final destination. N-linked glycans can contribute to proper folding both directly and indirectly. Addition of bulky polar carbohydrate chains can modify the properties of the polypeptide (7, 70). Glycosylation can affect the local secondary structure of proteins by stabilizing the conformation of residues proximal to the glycosylation site (42). An interaction of N-glycan with the polypeptide chain can induce a -turn structure (7). Also, glycoproteins are more stable and more resistant to proteolysis than their corresponding unglycosylated counterparts (42, 46). For example, the normally fully glycosylated wild-type -subunit of the apical transport enzyme, the gastric H-K-ATPase, is more resistant to proteolysis by trypsin (13) or proteinase K (5) than its glycosylation-deficient mutants. Resistance to proteolysis has been attributed to restricted access of the protease to cleavage sites within the protein after it achieves its normal configuration. N-glycans also can promote folding and quality control indirectly by serving as recognition “tags,” or sorting signals, that allow glycoproteins to interact with a variety of lectins, glycosidases, and glycosyltransferases (37, 39, 40, 77) (Table 2). Immediately after coupling the oligosaccharide core to the asparagine of the N-glycosylation consensus site, the two outermost terminal glucose residues are removed sequentially by glucosidase I and glucosidase II. The monoglucosylated form of N-linked glycan binds to calnexin, the membranebound lectin, or to calreticulin, the homologous soluble lectin. Calnexin and calreticulin are associated with ERp57, a thioldisulfide oxidoreductase that is involved in disulfide bond formation that influences protein folding (32, 33, 40). When glucosidase II removes the remaining glucose, the glycoprotein dissociates from calnexin and calreticulin. The protein now meets one of three possible fates. If properly folded, it moves to the Golgi. Exit from the ER may be assisted by mannose-binding lectins, such as ERGIC-53, VIP36, and VIPL (2, 62, 83). If the glycoprotein is incompletely folded, it becomes a substrate for a luminal ER glucosyltransferase that reglucosylates the glycans located in improperly folded regions. Via these reformed glycans, the glycoprotein again binds to calnexin, calreticulin, and ERp57 and other folding factors to achieve its correctly folded state (40). If, despite repeated cycles of deglycosylation-reglucosylation, a glycoprotein fails to fold properly, it is retained in the ER and eventually degraded. Targeting of misfolded proteins to the 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 the Na-K-ATPase 1-subunit and E-cadherin have a more complex structure in the rabbit intestinal cells than in rabbit renal cells (89). Moreover, the expression of various glycosyltransferases can change during cell or tissue development, resulting in alterations of glycosylation of a particular protein. For example, downregulation of the enzymes GnT-IV and GnT-V, upregulation of GnT-III, and a decrease in the complexity of N-glycans of the Na-K-ATPase 1-subunit and E-cadherin are observed as dispersed Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells in culture are transformed into a confluent monolayer (89). In addition, the presence of certain amino acid motifs or residues in a glycoprotein can affect the nature of its glycosylation. For instance, scattered basic residues and a peptide loop adjacent to the glycosylation site of lysosome-resident acid hydrolases are recognized by a GlcNAc-phosphate transferase in the Golgi. This results in the formation of a mannose 6-phosphate on the termini of high-mannose N-linked glycans, binding to the mannose-6-phosphate receptor, and targeting to lysosomes (30, 45). The spatial location of N-glycosylation sites in a protein tertiary structure can also affect the type of N-glycans formed. Certain N-glycans are more accessible to the Golgi glycosyltransferases and are therefore more likely to be processed to the complex N-glycans than others. As a result, particular glycosylation sites in a protein may be occupied by complex Nglycans and other sites by high-mannose or hybrid N-glycans. As an example, the mature Eag1 potassium channel has two N-glycans, but one of the N-glycans is complex while the other is high-mannose (61). Also, in the bovine lysosomal ␣-mannosidase, three of the six N-glycosylation sites carry only high-mannose N-glycans while the other three sites are occupied by various types of N-glycans (21). These studies indicate that the nature of N-glycan processing is dependent on the position of a particular N glycosylation site within the protein. Review F462 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS Table 2. Putative roles of N-glycans in folding, quality control, apical sorting, and plasma membrane retention of glycoproteins arising from their interactions with lectins Function Lectin Location Reference(s) Folding and quality control of glycoproteins Targeting misfolded proteins to ERAD Protein export from the ER to the Golgi Sorting of glycoproteins to lysosomes Clustering and stabilization of glycoproteins in lipid rafts Apical sorting of glycoproteins in polarized cells Plasma membrane retention of glycoproteins Calnexin and calreticulin EDEM ERGIC53, ERGL, and VIP36 MPR VIP36 VIP36 and Galectin-3 Unknown lectins ER ER ER and ERGIC TGN and endosomes Cis-Golgi and medial Golgi TGN and endosomes Plasma membrane or extracellular surface 32, 33 57 2, 62, 83 30, 45 23 15, 17, 34, 35 N/A ERAD, ER-associated degradation. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL acts as a chaperone to ensure that the ␣-subunit is properly folded so it can exit the ER. Role of N-Glycans in Post-Golgi Trafficking and Retention in the Apical Membrane N-glycans are required for polarized apical distribution of many membrane proteins in epithelia. Removal of N-glycans from many apical proteins has been shown to decrease their abundance in the apical membrane. For example, mutagenic removal of N-glycosylation sites in the gastric H-K-ATPase -subunit (90), bile salt export pump (56), and glycine transporter 2 (51, 94) significantly decreased their apical content and increased their intracellular accumulation (Table 3). Similarly, prevention of N-glycosylation by tunicamycin resulted in complete intracellular retention of the normally apically located membrane-bound enteropeptidase (95) (Table 3). One explanation for these findings is that normal N-glycosylation is required for apical sorting of these glycoproteins. Alternatively, since N-glycosylation is necessary for proper folding of proteins for them to exit the ER, the lack of N-glycans could result in ER retention, which of course would prevent trafficking to any membrane. To account for this, it is necessary to subtract the fraction of the protein retained in the ER from the total cellular pool of the protein. The majority of mature glycoproteins that traverse the Golgi carry complex N-glycans, whereas those residing in the ER are of the highmannose type. They can be distinguished from each other after treatment with EndoH, since high-mannose and hybrid glycans are sensitive to, whereas complex N-glycans are resistant to, cleavage by EndoH (Fig. 2). Only the quantity of mature, EndoH-resistant protein should be considered when the percentage of glycoprotein that is delivered to the apical membrane is calculated. Using this approach, the abundance of glycosylation-deficient mutants and wild-type H-K-ATPase -subunit present in the apical membrane, as determined using surface-selective biotinylation, was compared after normalization for the total cellular amount of the mature subunit (90). The relative quantity of the subunit in the apical membrane was greatly decreased after mutation of N1, N3, N5, or N7, but not after mutation of N2, N4, or N6. By contrast, these mutations had no effect on the relative abundance of this subunit in the basolateral membrane (90). These findings indicate that N-glycans at N1, N3, N5, and N7 are important for apical membrane localization of this -subunit. Similarly, comparison of a wild-type and a series of glycosylation-deficient mutants of the sialomucin endolyn expressed 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 ER-associated degradation (ERAD) is facilitated by lectin EDEM (57). ER retention and subsequent ERAD are critical for normal cellular function because they prevent accumulation of dysfunctional proteins in the cell (39, 40, 77). The contribution of N-glycans to the complex ER quality control system is emphasized by some of the functional abnormalities that arise in the presence of defective N-glycosylation (52, 64, 65). In some glycoproteins with multiple N-glycosylation sites, individual N-glycans are not of equal importance in mediating the processes of folding, ER retention, and export from the ER to the Golgi. For example, only one of the six glycans of the apically located protein, influenza virus hemaglutinin, is essential for folding and exit from the ER (38). Studies of the -subunit of the gastric H-K-ATPase expressed in LLC-PK1 cells have also shown that mutation of some of its seven N-glycosylation sites affect its exit from the ER, while mutations of others have little impact. The normally glycosylated -subunit is distributed between the plasma membrane and the intracellular compartments. At steady state, ⬃40% of the protein is detected in the ER, and the remaining 60% is distributed among the plasma membrane, Golgi, TGN, and endosomes (90). Removal of the seventh N-glycosylation site, N7, leads to virtually total retention of the subunit in the ER. Mutation of N1 increases the amount retained in the ER to 75%. Similarly, mutation of N3 and N5 also significantly increases the relative amount of the ER-resident fraction, but to a lesser extent. However, mutation of N2, N4, or N6 does not appreciably alter the quantity of protein retained in the ER. On the other hand, for some glycoproteins, the number of N-glycans rather than a specific N-glycan is important for their normal folding and production of fully functional glycoproteins. Mutagenic removal of one or two of the four N-glycosylation sites from the apical bile salt export pump (ABCB11) did not significantly affect its stability, trafficking, or function (56). However, removal of three or all four N-glycosylation sites dramatically increased the rate of proteasome-dependent degradation and resulted in significant intracellular retention of the protein. Comparison of mutants of ABCB11 with various combinations of mutated glycosylation sites showed that presence of at least two N-glycans is required for normal folding and trafficking of the protein (56). In oligomeric proteins, N-glycans can be important for subunit assembly and/or correct folding of the assembled complex. For example, studies using several different cell lines have shown that the catalytic ␣-subunits of either the Na-KATPase or the gastric H-K-ATPase are unable to exit the ER when expressed without their corresponding glycosylated -subunits (29). These observations suggest that the -subunit Review N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS F463 Table 3. Effect of impairment of N-glycosylation on localization of apical membrane proteins in polarized epithelia Apical Glycoprotein Number of N-Glycans Cell Type Association With Lipid Rafts Enteropeptidase 3 MDCK No Bile acid export pump (ABCB11) 4 MDCK Not tested Method Used to Impair N-Glycosylation Exposure to tunicamycin Mutagenesis of 1 or 2 sites Mutagenesis of 3 or 4 sites Mutagenesis of each individual site; mutagenesis of 2 sites 7 LLC-PK1 Not tested Tail-anchored chimeric protein 2 MDCK No Mutagenesis of both sites Glycine transporter 2 (GLYT2) 4 MDCK No Mutagenesis of all 3 sites Membrane dipeptidase (MDP) 2 MDCK, Caco-2 Yes Sialomucin endolyn 8 MDCK Not tested NPP3 Not specified MDCK, Caco-2 Yes Chimeric Fc receptor Not specified MDCK Not tested p75(NTR) 1 MDCK No (SPNT) 3 MDCK Not tested Sodium-sulfate cotransporter (NaSi-1) 1 OK, LLC-PK1, and MDCK No M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 3 MDCK No Mutagenesis of all 4 sites Mutagenesis of both sites Exposure to tunicamycin; mutagenesis of 1-8 sites Exposure to tunicamycin Exposure to tunicamycin Exposure to tunicamycin Mutagenesis of all 3 sites Exposure to tunicamycin; mutagenesis of a single site Mutagenesis of all 3 sites Reference(s) Intracellular retention* 95 No change 56 Intracellular retention* Increased retention in ER; increase in rate of endocytosis; decrease in ratio of apical to basolateral abundance Decrease in ratio of apical to basolateral abundance Decrease in ratio of apical to basolateral abundance Intracellular retention* Decrease in ratio of apical to basolateral abundance Decrease in ratio of apical to basolateral abundance 90 10 51, 94 67 72 Intracellular retention* 19, 53 Retention in Golgi 31 No change 93 No change 50 No change 74 No change 12 N-glycosylation was prevented by mutation of the consensus N-glycosylation site (s) of the individual protein, or by treatment of cells with tunicamycin, a general inhibitor of N-glycosylation. OK, opposum kidney; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney. *Presize intracellular compartments were not identified. in MDCK cells has shown that only two specific sites (N68 and N74) of the eight N-glycosylation sites are important for apical distribution of this protein (72). Disturbance of N-glycosylation of several other membrane proteins, such as the tailanchored chimeric protein (10), glycine transporter 2 (51, 94), membrane dipeptidase (67), ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/ phosphodiesterase NPP3 (19, 53), and chimeric Fc receptor (31) reduced their apical expression compared with their basolateral expression (Table 3). However, the relative importance of specific N-glycans in apical localization of these proteins has not been determined. Further evidence for the role of N-glycans in apical distribution of proteins has been derived from studies in which the effect of addition of N-glycans to various proteins on their localization was examined. A truncated occludin and a chimeric ERGIC-53 residing in the Golgi in their nonglycosylated forms were redistributed to the apical membrane after addition of N-glycans (31) (Table 4). Similarly, addition of N-glycans to chimeric non-raft-associated transmembrane protein and tail-anchored chimeric protein, both residing on the basolateral AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL membrane, caused them to be redistributed to the apical membrane (6, 10) (Table 4). Finally, the sequential addition of one to five N-glycans to the basolaterally located Na-K-ATPase 1-subunit, a protein with three N-glycans, caused an increasing fraction of this subunit to be distributed to the apical membrane of HGT-1 cells (91). The mutant of NaK-ATPase 1 which contained eight N-glycans in a pattern identical to that of the homologous isoform, the Na-KATPase 2-subunit (which normally resides on the apical membrane in HGT-1 cells), was predominantly detected on the apical membrane (91). These data are consistent with an important role for the N-glycans in promoting distribution of a number of proteins to the apical membrane of polarized cells. However, the presence of N-glycans on a protein does not ensure it will be distributed to the apical membrane. Several N-glycosylated proteins, including but not restricted to the transferrin receptor (63), liver sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (87), and E-cadherin (54, 55) are located only on the basolateral membrane of polarized cells. 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 H-K-ATPase -subunit Effect on Protein Distribution Review F464 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS β β β Furthermore, several proteins such as transmembrane neurotrophin receptor p75 (93), the sodium-dependent purineselective nucleoside transporter SPNT (50), the sodium-sulfate cotransporter Na,Si-1 (74), and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (12) are N-glycosylated, but normal N-glycosylation is not necessary for their apical localization. Presumably, these proteins contain other intrinsic sorting signals that are sufficient to ensure their apical distribution. It has been shown that the O-glycosylated stem region of p75 acts as the apical sorting signal (93). The M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor contains apical sorting information in its third intracellular loop (12). However, the apical sorting signals for SPNT and Na,Si-1 remain to be identified. It is unclear why N-glycans are important for the apical delivery of some N-glycosylated proteins, but not for others. This remains fertile ground for further studies. N-glycans are required for both apical membrane delivery and retention of glycoproteins in the apical membrane. Many glycoproteins require intact N-glycans to be located on the apical membrane. One possible explanation is that N-glycans act as apical sorting signals and thus promote apical membrane delivery of the proteins. However, the quantity of protein on the apical membrane depends on the rate of both its delivery to this location and endocytosis of the protein. As noted above, the mutations of N1, N3, N5, or N7 significantly decreased the relative apical content of the H-K ATPase -subunit (90). Mutations of N1, N3, or N5 also increased the rate of endocytosis of the -subunit. The rate of endocytosis of the N7 mutant could not be measured due to the very low apical content of the mutant. Mutations of N2, N4, or N6 did not change either the relative apical content or endocytosis. None of the mutations affected the rate of degradation (90). The decrease in the relative apical content of the H-K ATPase -subunit N1, N3, and N5 mutants could be due to impaired apical membrane delivery and/or enhanced endocytosis. The apical content of all three mutants was decreased to a greater extent than could be expected from an increase in the rate of endocytosis. For example, in the N1 mutant, the apical content was decreased sixfold, but the rate of endocytosis was increased only threefold. This indicates that the apical membrane delivery from the TGN/endosomes was also affected by the mutation. Therefore, the presence of specific N-glycans is required for both apical delivery and membrane retention of the H-KATPase -subunit. The rate of delivery of a protein from the TGN/endosomes to the apical membrane depends on the efficiency of protein sorting into apical transport containers and the rate of delivery of these containers to the apical membrane. Table 4. Effect of addition of N-glycans on polarized distribution of proteins in the plasma membrane of epithelial cells Protein Na-K-ATPase 1-subunit Truncated occludin Chimeric ERGIC-53 Chimeric non-raft-associated transmembrane protein Tail-anchored chimeric protein Number of N-Glycans Added Cell Type 1-5* 2* 2* 2* HGT-1 MDCK MDCK MDCK 2† MDCK Protein Location Before Addition Ratio of Apical to Basolateral Abundance Reference Basolateral membrane Golgi Golgi Mostly intracellular; basolateral membrane Basolateral membrane Increased Increased Increased Increased 91 31 31 6 Increased 10 *N-glycosylation sites in the protein extracellular domains were engineered by mutagenesis. †Twenty-one-amino acid sequence of bovine opsin containing 2 N-glycosylation sites was added to the COOH terminus of the extracellular domain of a tail-anchored protein. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 Fig. 2. H-K-ATPase -subunits expressed on the apical surface of LLC-PK1 cells are complex-type glycosylated, while the intracellular nonmature fraction contains high-mannose-type subunits. The YFP-linked -subunit of the H-K-ATPase (YFP-) stably expressed in LLC-PK1 cells is detected in total cell lysates in 2 forms: EndoH resistant and EndoH sensitive. Only the EndoH-resistant complex-type form reaches the apical surface, as detected by apical surface biotinylation. The intracellular form of YFP- is converted by EndoH to the deglycosylated protein that has the same gel mobility as YFP- in cell lysates prepared after exposure of the cells to tunicamycin, the inhibitor of N-glycosylation,. The gel mobility of the EndoH-sensitive form of YFP- is the same as that of YFP- from the cells exposed to dMM (preserves the high-mannose structure of glycoproteins) and greater than that of YFP- from the cells exposed to swainsonine (preserves the hybrid structure of glycoproteins). These results indicate that the intracellular fraction of YFP- contains high-mannose N-glycans and likely represents the ER-resident form. Symbols for monosaccharide residues and abbreviations correspond to those in the legend to Fig. 1. Review N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL In contrast, the apical localization of gp114 (recently identified as a dog homolog of CEACAM proteins) (27) in MDCK cells was not affected by dMM (48), indicating that terminal chains are not important for apical distribution of this protein. Consistently, exposure of LLC-PK1 cells expressing the H-KATPase -subunit to dMM or swainsonine led to only a slight decrease in the relative apical content of the H-K-ATPase -subunit, while mutation of one of the seven N-glycosylation sites, either N1, N3, N5, or N7, resulted in a severalfold greater reduction in relative apical abundance (90). On the other hand, the rate of endocytosis of the -subunit was significantly higher in cells exposed to swainsonine than with any of the single site-deficient mutants (90). These data suggest that the core region sugars play the major role in apical delivery of the -subunit, whereas the terminal monosaccharide residues are important for stabilization and retention of the -subunit in the apical membrane. Putative Apical Sorting Machinery that Recognizes N-Glycans Search for apical sorting receptors. The mechanism by which the presence of N-glycans can facilitate apical sorting of glycoproteins is poorly understood. The 1B-subunit of the AP-1B adaptor protein complex binds specifically to basolateral sorting motifs present in the cytoplasmic domains of basolateral proteins, promoting their placement into the basolateral transport containers and subsequent delivery to the basolateral membrane (25, 26, 28). It seems logical that a similar coupling between a sorting receptor and N-glycans would be used by the cell for delivery of glycoproteins to the apical membrane. Since N-glycans are composed of carbohydrate moieties, a priori the apical sorting receptor must be a lectin, i.e., a carbohydrate-binding protein. One potential apical sorting receptor, the mannose-binding lectin VIP36 (43, 44, 79), is predominantly localized in ERGIC and the cis-Golgi (36, 83), and to a lesser extent in the TGN and plasma membrane (34, 82). VIP36 plays a role in the export of glycoproteins from the ER (36, 83) (Table 2). VIP36 was also found to promote apical sorting of several glycoproteins. The apical membrane content of this lectin in MDCK cells was found to be twice as high as the basolateral content, and the plasma membrane glycoproteins recognized by VIP36 were also twofold enriched in the apical membrane compared with the basolateral membrane (34). Overexpression of VIP36 in MDCK cells increased the relative apical content of both VIP36 and VIP36-recognized glycoproteins. In contrast, the overproduction of a mutant version of VIP36, which has no lectin activity, had no effect. Furthermore, VIP36 has been shown to bind to clusterin and ␣-amylase and to increase the relative apical abundance of these proteins (34, 35). Consistent with a specificity of VIP36 for high-mannose-type glycans (43, 44, 79), both clusterin and ␣-amylase carry not only complextype N-glycans but also the high-mannose-type N-glycans (34, 35). However, since the majority of mature glycoproteins contain predominantly complex-type N-glycans, VIP36 is unlikely a universal apical sorting receptor. A galactose-binding lectin, galectin-3, is another potential apical sorting receptor. This lectin was detected in raft-independent apical carrier vesicles in MDCK cells (15). Galectin-3 has been found to directly interact with three apical glycopro- 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 The mutation of N-glycosylation sites in a cargo protein is unlikely to affect export and transport of the containers. Thus the decreased rate of delivery of the glycosylation-deficient mutants to the apical membrane is consistent with the hypothesis that N-glycans facilitate apical sorting. However, it is not clear whether N-glycans per se serve as apical sorting signals or whether they facilitate recognition of other apical sorting signals present in a glycoprotein by providing an optimal conformation of the protein. Also, it is possible that N-glycans facilitate association of glycoproteins with other proteins that contain apical sorting information, thus promoting cosorting of glycoproteins into vesicles destined for the apical membrane. It is remarkable that the same N-glycans (N1, N3, and N5) of the H-K-ATPase -subunit that are important for ER-toGolgi trafficking are also important for apical delivery and membrane retention of the protein (90). These results suggest that, similar to ER-to-Golgi trafficking, both apical delivery and apical membrane retention of the H-K-ATPase -subunit are lectin dependent and only specific N-glycans are accessible to these lectins. Reduced retention of the mutants in the apical membrane might result from disruption of the interaction of specific N-glycans of the H-K-ATPase -subunit with an unidentified integral or extracellular lectin at the apical membrane, which acts to anchor the protein in the membrane. As a consequence, the rate of constitutive endocytosis of the mutant subunit would increase. Interactions of lectins with N-glycans attached to other membrane proteins have been shown to be important for their retention in the plasma membrane in several different cell types (11, 47, 64, 65, 68). The majority of mature glycoproteins are of the complex type. The complex-glycosylated proteins contain the threemannosyl core (Fig. 1, green rectangle) and terminal chains that are added during rebuilding of high-mannose N-glycans in the Golgi. To examine whether the core region, the terminal chains, or both are necessary for delivery and membrane retention of apical proteins, various inhibitors of N-glycan processing have been employed. Treatment of cells with these inhibitors prevents trimming and further terminal glycosylation of high-mannose N-glycans. This results in the absence of either all (dMM) or most (swainsonine) of the terminal sugars normally present in the complex N-glycans (Fig. 1). Similar to dMM, kifunesine, the inhibitor of the ER ␣-mannosidase 1, abolishes addition of terminal chains to the high-mannose glycans (not shown). Treatment of MDCK cells expressing endolyn with dMM or kifunesine decreased the relative apical abundance, biosynthetic apical delivery, and postendocytic apical delivery of the protein to the same extent as tunicamycin (72, 73). These results suggest that the terminal chains rather than the residues of the core region of N-glycans are important for apical sorting of endolyn. However, endolyn contains not only N-glycans, but also O-glycans. It has been shown that disruption of N-glycan processing by dMM dramatically inhibited O-glycosylation of several proteins that contain both N- and Oglycosylation sites (60). Therefore, the possibility that dMM or kifunesine affected apical distribution of endolyn due to the impairment of its O-glycosylation cannot be excluded. In accord with the latter possibility, benzyl-N-acetyl-␣-D-galactosaminide that inhibits elongation of both O- and N-glycans also impaired apical polarity of endolyn (72). F465 Review F466 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL natural GPI-anchored glycoprotein, membrane dipeptidase (67, 88). Removal of a GPI anchor excluded the protein from lipid rafts but did not impair its apical distribution. On the other hand, removal of N-glycans from the protein resulted in basolateral sorting but did not affect the protein association with rafts (67, 88). Oligomerization of apical glycoproteins appears to increase their affinity for rafts. For example, clustering of gp114 molecules in the plasma membrane induced by interaction with the gp114-specific antibodies increases association of gp114 with lipid rafts, as judged by increased detergent resistance of the glycoprotein (92). It has been postulated that intracellular multivalent lectins could cluster apical glycoproteins in rafts in vivo and thus facilitate their apical delivery (41, 81, 92). However, direct evidence for the importance of N-glycans in clustering of apical N-glycosylated proteins in lipid rafts has not been presented. Furthermore, several pieces of evidence suggest that the presence of N-glycans does not facilitate raft association. First, many N-glycosylated apical proteins are not associated with lipid rafts (Table 3). Second, removal of N-glycans did not affect raft association of the membrane dipeptidase, while removal of a GPI anchor excluded this protein from lipid rafts (67, 88). Finally, apical pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase NPP3, but not its basolateral homolog, NPP1, associates with rafts, even though both NPP3 and NPP1 contain N-glycans. Specific positively charged amino acid residues in the cytoplasmic tail rather than Nglycans have been shown to be important for association of NPP3 with lipid rafts (19, 53). Moreover, lectins that cluster N-glycosylated proteins in lipid rafts have not been found. Lectins of the galectin family were considered as candidates. They usually are multivalent and, therefore, binding of one lectin molecule to N-glycans that belong to different glycoprotein molecules can organize glycoproteins in clusters, bundles, arrays, and lattices (8). Indeed, galectin-3 causes clustering of apical glycoproteins, lactasephlorizin hydrolase, transmembrane neurotrophin receptor p75, or gp114 (15, 17). However, none of these three proteins are present in rafts. Also, galectin-3 does not bind to sucraseisomaltase, the apical glycoprotein that associates with lipid rafts (15). These results indicate that galectin-3 does not play a role in clustering of apical glycoproteins in lipid rafts. Another lectin of the same family, galectin-4, is a major component of lipid rafts (14, 16). Depletion of galectin-4 impairs formation of rafts and affects apical sorting of several proteins in HT-29 cells. However, galectin-4 binds with high affinity to glycolipids but not glycoproteins (16). Recent studies have shown that association of apical proteins with rafts occurs not only in the TGN (9) or late compartments of the Golgi apparatus (86) but also in the cis-Golgi or even in the ER (3, 78). It is possible that the mannose-binding lectin VIP36 facilitates apical sorting of glycoproteins by stabilizing them in lipid rafts in the early steps of the glycoprotein processing in the ER or cis-Golgi, when the mannose residues are exposed at the termini of the carbohydrate chains. This hypothesis is in agreement with the fact that VIP36 was originally isolated from rafts (23), as well as with the data showing that overexpression of VIP36 increases apical distribution of two raft-associated N-glycosylated proteins, clusterin and ␣-amylase (34, 35). 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 teins, lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, transmembrane neurotrophin receptor p75, and gp114 (15, 17). This interaction is competitively inhibited by lactose, suggesting that galectin-3 binds to the glycans attached to these proteins. Lactasephlorizin hydrolase and transmembrane neurotrophin receptor p75 contain both N- and O-glycans, whereas gp114 has only N-glycans Carbohydrate-dependent binding of galectin-3 to p75 requires the presence of the O-glycosylated stalk domain that does not contain putative N-glycosylation sites (15, 17). These data suggest that galectin-3 can bind to both N- and O-glycans. Depletion of galectin-3 from MDCK cells prevents formation of the high-molecular-weight clusters containing lactasephlorizin hydrolase, transmembrane neurotrophin receptor p75 or gp114 and results in missorting of all three apical membrane proteins to the basolateral membrane (15, 17). These findings suggest that galectin-3 cross-links glycoproteins to form large galectin-3-containing clusters in the TGN membranes. These clusters presumably bud from the TGN to form apical transport containers (15, 17). Galectin-3 binds to galactose, a terminal residue that might be exposed at the carbohydrate chain termini of the mature complex N-glycans (69). Consistently, the efficiency of coimmunoprecipitation of gp114 with galectin-3 and formation of the high-molecular-weight clusters containing gp114 and galectin-3, as well as apical distribution of gp114 are severely impaired in galactosylation-deficient MDCKII-RCAr cells (15, 17, 48). However, the apical localization of gp114 in wild-type MDCK cells is not affected by the mannosidase I inhibitor dMM, which prevents formation of hybrid and complex Nglycans and thus abolishes the insertion of the galactose residues into N-glycans (48). The explanation for these contradictory experimental observations is unknown. Relationship between N-glycans and lipid rafts. Significant evidence has accumulated to suggest involvement of lipid rafts in sorting and delivery of proteins to the apical membrane. Lipid rafts are rigid membrane microdomains enriched in glycolipids, sphingolipids, and cholesterol embedded in the fluid membrane (81). In 1997, Simons and Ikonen (84) postulated that newly synthesized apical proteins accumulate in these microdomains in the TGN, while basolateral proteins are excluded from these lipid rafts. Small lipid rafts are then clustered, forming bigger rigid membrane domains that then bud from the TGN as apical transport containers (41, 81). Certain apical integral glycoproteins, including influenza viral proteins hemaglutinin and neuraminidase, associate with lipid rafts via their transmembrane domains (4, 80). Although transmembrane domains of these proteins are important for both raft association and apical sorting, the signals for raft association and apical sorting are not identical (4, 49, 80). Raft association appears necessary, but not sufficient, for apical sorting of hemaglutinin (4, 49, 80). In contrast, raft association is not absolutely required for apical sorting of neuraminidase (4, 80). GPI-anchored proteins associate with lipid rafts due to the favorable packing of the GPI anchor into ordered domains of the membrane (85). Stable association with rafts is required for apical sorting of several chimeric GPI-anchored proteins (18, 66, 75, 81, 85). However, raft association is neither necessary nor sufficient for apical sorting of a Review N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS Conclusions and Future Directions GRANTS This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-077149, DK-58333, and DK-053642. REFERENCES 1. Varki A, Cummings R, Esco J, Freeze H, Hart G, Marth J. Essentials of Glycobiology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999. 2. Appenzeller C, Andersson H, Kappeler F, Hauri HP. The lectin ERGIC-53 is a cargo transport receptor for glycoproteins. Nat Cell Biol 1: 330 –334, 1999. 3. Bagnat M, Keranen S, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Simons K. Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3254 –3259, 2000. 4. Barman S, Nayak DP. Analysis of the transmembrane domain of influenza virus neuraminidase, a type II transmembrane glycoprotein, for apical sorting and raft association. J Virol 74: 6538 – 6545, 2000. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 5. Beggah AT, Jaunin P, Geering K. Role of glycosylation and disulfide bond formation in the beta subunit in the folding and functional expression of Na,K-ATPase. J Biol Chem 272: 10318 –10326, 1997. 6. Benting JH, Rietveld AG, Simons K. N-Glycans mediate the apical sorting of a GPI-anchored, raft-associated protein in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Cell Biol 146: 313–320, 1999. 7. Bosques CJ, Tschampel SM, Woods RJ, Imperiali B. Effects of glycosylation on peptide conformation: a synergistic experimental and computational study. J Am Chem Soc 126: 8421– 8425, 2004. 8. Brewer CF, Miceli MC, Baum LG. Clusters, bundles, arrays and lattices: novel mechanisms for lectin-saccharide-mediated cellular interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 616 – 623, 2002. 9. Brown DA. Lipid rafts, detergent-resistant membranes, and raft targeting signals. Physiology (Bethesda) 21: 430 – 439, 2006. 10. Bulbarelli A, Sprocati T, Barberi M, Pedrazzini E, Borgese N. Trafficking of tail-anchored proteins: transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and sorting between surface domains in polarised epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 115: 1689 –1702, 2002. 11. Cha SK, Ortega B, Kurosu H, Rosenblatt KP, Kuro OM, Huang CL. Removal of sialic acid involving Klotho causes cell-surface retention of TRPV5 channel via binding to galectin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9805–9810, 2008. 12. Chmelar RS, Nathanson NM. Identification of a novel apical sorting motif and mechanism of targeting of the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 281: 35381–35396, 2006. 13. Crothers JM Jr, Asano S, Kimura T, Yoshida A, Wong A, Kang JW, Forte JG. Contribution of oligosaccharides to protection of the H,KATPase beta-subunit against trypsinolysis. Electrophoresis 25: 2586 – 2592, 2004. 14. Danielsen EM, van Deurs B. Galectin-4 and small intestinal brush border enzymes form clusters. Mol Biol Cell 8: 2241–2251, 1997. 15. Delacour D, Cramm-Behrens CI, Drobecq H, Le Bivic A, Naim HY, Jacob R. Requirement for galectin-3 in apical protein sorting. Curr Biol 16: 408 – 414, 2006. 16. Delacour D, Gouyer V, Zanetta JP, Drobecq H, Leteurtre E, Grard G, Moreau-Hannedouche O, Maes E, Pons A, Andre S, Le Bivic A, Gabius HJ, Manninen A, Simons K, Huet G. Galectin-4 and sulfatides in apical membrane trafficking in enterocyte-like cells. J Cell Biol 169: 491–501, 2005. 17. Delacour D, Greb C, Koch A, Salomonsson E, Leffler H, Le Bivic A, Jacob R. Apical sorting by galectin-3-dependent glycoprotein clustering. Traffic 8: 379 –388, 2007. 18. Delacour D, Jacob R. Apical protein transport. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 2491–2505, 2006. 19. Delaunay JL, Breton M, Goding JW, Trugnan G, Maurice M. Differential detergent resistance of the apical and basolateral NPPases: relationship with polarized targeting. J Cell Sci 120: 1009 –1016, 2007. 20. Ellis MA, Potter BA, Cresawn KO, Weisz OA. Polarized biosynthetic traffic in renal epithelial cells: sorting, sorting, everywhere. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F707–F713, 2006. 21. Faid V, Evjen G, Tollersrud OK, Michalski JC, Morelle W. Sitespecific glycosylation analysis of the bovine lysosomal alpha-mannosidase. Glycobiology 16: 440 – 461, 2006. 22. Farquhar MG, Palade GE. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol 17: 375– 412, 1963. 23. Fiedler K, Parton RG, Kellner R, Etzold T, Simons K. VIP36, a novel component of glycolipid rafts and exocytic carrier vesicles in epithelial cells. EMBO J 13: 1729 –1740, 1994. 24. Fiedler K, Simons K. The role of N-glycans in the secretory pathway. Cell 81: 309 –312, 1995. 25. Folsch H. Regulation of membrane trafficking in polarized epithelial cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 208 –213, 2008. 26. Folsch H, Ohno H, Bonifacino JS, Mellman I. A novel clathrin adaptor complex mediates basolateral targeting in polarized epithelial cells. Cell 99: 189 –198, 1999. 27. Fullekrug J, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Simons K. Identification of glycosylated marker proteins of epithelial polarity in MDCK cells by homology driven proteomics (Abstract). BMC Biochem 7: 8, 2006. 28. Gan Y, McGraw TE, Rodriguez-Boulan E. The epithelial-specific adaptor AP1B mediates post-endocytic recycling to the basolateral membrane. Nat Cell Biol 4: 605– 609, 2002. 29. Geering K. The functional role of beta subunits in oligomeric P-type ATPases. J Bioenerg Biomembr 33: 425– 438, 2001. 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 N-glycans are attached to the majority of membrane proteins. Besides the direct effect of N-glycans on the conformation and intrinsic properties of proteins, N-glycans play a role in intracellular trafficking that arises from specific interactions of N-glycans with intracellular lectins. The best studied of these are the interactions of N-glycans with the ER-resident lectins that are crucial to folding and quality control of newly synthesized glycoproteins and their export from the ER to Golgi. These glycan-lectin interactions ensure that only properly folded proteins exit the ER (Table 2). Growing experimental evidence also suggests that N-glycans attached to a number of apical proteins are required for their apical distribution (Tables 3 and 4). Recent studies indicate that N-glycans are important for delivery of certain glycoproteins to the apical membrane (72, 73, 90) and for their retention in the apical membrane (90). However, apical localization of a number of membrane glycoproteins is not affected by changes in N-glycosylation. Moreover, several proteins that are specifically sorted to the basolateral membrane are, in fact, N-glycosylated. Identification of specific lectins that recognize N-glycans and facilitate apical distribution of glycoproteins is a challenging task. So far, only two lectins have been identified as potential apical sorting receptors: the mannose-binding lectin VIP36 and the galactose-binding lectin galectin-3. It is remarkable that VIP36 has been found to facilitate apical distribution of two raft-associated proteins (34, 35), whereas galectin-3 has been shown to be critical for apical location of three non-raft proteins but not a raft-associated protein (15). Possibly, VIP36 and galectin-3 facilitate apical distribution of glycoproteins by two different mechanisms, raft dependent and raft independent. However, this hypothesis needs to be tested for other apical proteins. Also, given the highly diverse structures of complex N-glycans, it would be expected that other lectins facilitating apical sorting and apical membrane retention of glycoproteins will be identified. In summary, N-glycans attached to many apical proteins are critical to their maturation, sorting, and trafficking to and retention in the apical membrane. As a consequence, defects in N-glycosylation can lead to cellular abnormalities in different tissues. Further investigations may reveal previously unsuspected roles of N-glycans in trafficking of glycoproteins which will provide insight into normal epithelial development and the pathogenesis of various diseases. F467 Review F468 N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 55. Miyashita Y, Ozawa M. A dileucine motif in its cytoplasmic domain directs beta-catenin-uncoupled E-cadherin to the lysosome. J Cell Sci 120: 4395– 4406, 2007. 56. Mochizuki K, Kagawa T, Numari A, Harris MJ, Itoh J, Watanabe N, Mine T, Arias IM. Two N-linked glycans are required to maintain the transport activity of the bile salt export pump (ABCB11) in MDCK II cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292: G818 –G828, 2007. 57. Molinari M, Calanca V, Galli C, Lucca P, Paganetti P. Role of EDEM in the release of misfolded glycoproteins from the calnexin cycle. Science 299: 1397–1400, 2003. 58. Mostov K, Su T, ter Beest M. Polarized epithelial membrane traffic: conservation and plasticity. Nat Cell Biol 5: 287–293, 2003. 59. Muth TR, Caplan MJ. Transport protein trafficking in polarized cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19: 333–366, 2003. 60. Naim HY, Joberty G, Alfalah M, Jacob R. Temporal association of the N- and O-linked glycosylation events and their implication in the polarized sorting of intestinal brush border sucrase-isomaltase, aminopeptidase N, and dipeptidyl peptidase IV. J Biol Chem 274: 17961–17967, 1999. 61. Napp J, Monje F, Stuhmer W, Pardo LA. Glycosylation of Eag1 (Kv10.1) potassium channels: intracellular trafficking and functional consequences. J Biol Chem 280: 29506 –29512, 2005. 62. Nufer O, Mitrovic S, Hauri HP. Profile-based data base scanning for animal L-type lectins and characterization of VIPL, a novel VIP36-like endoplasmic reticulum protein. J Biol Chem 278: 15886 –15896, 2003. 63. Odorizzi G, Trowbridge IS. Structural requirements for basolateral sorting of the human transferrin receptor in the biosynthetic and endocytic pathways of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Cell Biol 137: 1255– 1264, 1997. 64. Ohtsubo K, Marth JD. Glycosylation in cellular mechanisms of health and disease. Cell 126: 855– 867, 2006. 65. Ohtsubo K, Takamatsu S, Minowa MT, Yoshida A, Takeuchi M, Marth JD. Dietary and genetic control of glucose transporter 2 glycosylation promotes insulin secretion in suppressing diabetes. Cell 123: 1307– 1321, 2005. 66. Paladino S, Sarnataro D, Tivodar S, Zurzolo C. Oligomerization is a specific requirement for apical sorting of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositolanchored proteins but not for non-raft-associated apical proteins. Traffic 8: 251–258, 2007. 67. Pang S, Urquhart P, Hooper NM. N-glycans, not the GPI anchor, mediate the apical targeting of a naturally glycosylated, GPI-anchored protein in polarised epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 117: 5079 –5086, 2004. 68. Partridge EA, Le Roy C, Di Guglielmo GM, Pawling J, Cheung P, Granovsky M, Nabi IR, Wrana JL, Dennis JW. Regulation of cytokine receptors by Golgi N-glycan processing and endocytosis. Science 306: 120 –124, 2004. 69. Patnaik SK, Potvin B, Carlsson S, Sturm D, Leffler H, Stanley P. Complex N-glycans are the major ligands for galectin-1, -3, and -8 on Chinese hamster ovary cells. Glycobiology 16: 305–317, 2006. 70. Petrescu AJ, Milac AL, Petrescu SM, Dwek RA, Wormald MR. Statistical analysis of the protein environment of N-glycosylation sites: implications for occupancy, structure, and folding. Glycobiology 14: 103–114, 2004. 71. Potter BA, Hughey RP, Weisz OA. Role of N- and O-glycans in polarized biosynthetic sorting. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1–C10, 2006. 72. Potter BA, Ihrke G, Bruns JR, Weixel KM, Weisz OA. Specific N-glycans direct apical delivery of transmembrane, but not soluble or glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored forms of endolyn in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell 15: 1407–1416, 2004. 73. Potter BA, Weixel KM, Bruns JR, Ihrke G, Weisz OA. N-glycans mediate apical recycling of the sialomucin endolyn in polarized MDCK cells. Traffic 7: 146 –154, 2006. 74. Regeer RR, Nicke A, Markovich D. Quaternary structure and apical membrane sorting of the mammalian NaSi-1 sulfate transporter in renal cell lines. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 2240 –2251, 2007. 75. Rodriguez-Boulan E, Kreitzer G, Musch A. Organization of vesicular trafficking in epithelia. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 233–247, 2005. 76. Rodriguez-Boulan E, Musch A, Le Bivic A. Epithelial trafficking: new routes to familiar places. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16: 436 – 442, 2004. 77. Ruddock LW, Molinari M. N-glycan processing in ER quality control. J Cell Sci 119: 4373– 4380, 2006. 78. Sarnataro D, Campana V, Paladino S, Stornaiuolo M, Nitsch L, Zurzolo C. PrP(C) association with lipid rafts in the early secretory 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 30. Ghosh P, Dahms NM, Kornfeld S. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 202–212, 2003. 31. Gut A, Kappeler F, Hyka N, Balda MS, Hauri HP, Matter K. Carbohydrate-mediated Golgi to cell surface transport and apical targeting of membrane proteins. EMBO J 17: 1919 –1929, 1998. 32. Hammond C, Helenius A. A chaperone with a sweet tooth. Curr Biol 3: 884 – 886, 1993. 33. Hammond C, Helenius A. Folding of VSV G protein: sequential interaction with BiP and calnexin. Science 266: 456 – 458, 1994. 34. Hara-Kuge S, Ohkura T, Ideo H, Shimada O, Atsumi S, Yamashita K. Involvement of VIP36 in intracellular transport and secretion of glycoproteins in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. J Biol Chem 277: 16332–16339, 2002. 35. Hara-Kuge S, Seko A, Shimada O, Tosaka-Shimada H, Yamashita K. The binding of VIP36 and alpha-amylase in the secretory vesicles via high-mannose type glycans. Glycobiology 14: 739 –744, 2004. 36. Hauri HP, Nufer O, Breuza L, Tekaya HB, Liang L. Lectins and protein traffic early in the secretory pathway. Biochem Soc Symp: 73– 82, 2002. 37. Hebert DN, Molinari M. In and out of the ER: protein folding, quality control, degradation, and related human diseases. Physiol Rev 87: 1377– 1408, 2007. 38. Hebert DN, Zhang JX, Chen W, Foellmer B, Helenius A. The number and location of glycans on influenza hemagglutinin determine folding and association with calnexin and calreticulin. J Cell Biol 139: 613– 623, 1997. 39. Helenius A, Aebi M. Intracellular functions of N-linked glycans. Science 291: 2364 –2369, 2001. 40. Helenius A, Aebi M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 1019 –1049, 2004. 41. Helms JB, Zurzolo C. Lipids as targeting signals: lipid rafts and intracellular trafficking. Traffic 5: 247–254, 2004. 42. Imperiali B, O’Connor SE. Effect of N-linked glycosylation on glycopeptide and glycoprotein structure. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3: 643– 649, 1999. 43. Kamiya Y, Kamiya D, Yamamoto K, Nyfeler B, Hauri HP, Kato K. Molecular basis of sugar recognition by the human L-type lectins ERGIC53, VIPL, and VIP36. J Biol Chem 283: 1857–1861, 2008. 44. Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi Y, Takahashi N, Arata Y, Kasai K, Ihara Y, Matsuo I, Ito Y, Yamamoto K, Kato K. Sugar-binding properties of VIP36, an intracellular animal lectin operating as a cargo receptor. J Biol Chem 280: 37178 –37182, 2005. 45. Kornfeld S. Trafficking of lysosomal enzymes. FASEB J 1: 462– 468, 1987. 46. Kundra R, Kornfeld S. Asparagine-linked oligosaccharides protect Lamp-1 and Lamp-2 from intracellular proteolysis. J Biol Chem 274: 31039 –31046, 1999. 47. Lajoie P, Partridge EA, Guay G, Goetz JG, Pawling J, Lagana A, Joshi B, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Plasma membrane domain organization regulates EGFR signaling in tumor cells. J Cell Biol 179: 341–356, 2007. 48. Le Bivic A, Garcia M, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Ricin-resistant MadinDarby canine kidney cells missort a major endogenous apical sialoglycoprotein. J Biol Chem 268: 6909 – 6916, 1993. 49. Lin S, Naim HY, Rodriguez AC, Roth MG. Mutations in the middle of the transmembrane domain reverse the polarity of transport of the influenza virus hemagglutinin in MDCK epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 142: 51–57, 1998. 50. Mangravite LM, Giacomini KM. Sorting of rat SPNT in renal epithelium is independent of N-glycosylation. Pharm Res 20: 319 –323, 2003. 51. Martinez-Maza R, Poyatos I, Lopez-Corcuera B, Nu E, Gimenez C, Zafra F, Aragon C. The role of N-glycosylation in transport to the plasma membrane and sorting of the neuronal glycine transporter GLYT2. J Biol Chem 276: 2168 –2173, 2001. 52. Matsumura K, Ohtsubo T, Oniki H, Fujii K, Iida M. Gender-related association of serum uric acid and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. Circ J 70: 885– 888, 2006. 53. Meerson NR, Bello V, Delaunay JL, Slimane TA, Delautier D, Lenoir C, Trugnan G, Maurice M. Intracellular traffic of the ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase NPP3 to the apical plasma membrane of MDCK and Caco-2 cells: apical targeting occurs in the absence of N-glycosylation. J Cell Sci 113: 4193– 4202, 2000. 54. Miranda KC, Khromykh T, Christy P, Le TL, Gottardi CJ, Yap AS, Stow JL, Teasdale RD. A dileucine motif targets E-cadherin to the basolateral cell surface in Madin-Darby canine kidney and LLC-PK1 epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 276: 22565–22572, 2001. Review N-GLYCANS AND TRAFFICKING OF APICAL MEMBRANE PROTEINS 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 85. 86. 87. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. function and plasma membrane targeting. J Biol Chem 276: 6825– 6833, 2001. Urquhart P, Pang S, Hooper NM. N-glycans as apical targeting signals in polarized epithelial cells. Biochem Soc Symp: 39 – 45, 2005. Vagin O, Tokhtaeva E, Yakubov I, Shevchenko E, Sachs G. Inverse correlation between the extent of N-glycan branching and intercellular adhesion in epithelia. Contribution of the Na,K-ATPase beta1 subunit. J Biol Chem 283: 2192–2202, 2008. Vagin O, Turdikulova S, Sachs G. The H,K-ATPase beta subunit as a model to study the role of N-glycosylation in membrane trafficking and apical sorting. J Biol Chem 279: 39026 –39034, 2004. Vagin O, Turdikulova S, Sachs G. Recombinant addition of N-glycosylation sites to the basolateral Na,K-ATPase beta1 subunit results in its clustering in caveolae and apical sorting in HGT-1 cells. J Biol Chem 280: 43159 – 43167, 2005. Verkade P, Harder T, Lafont F, Simons K. Induction of caveolae in the apical plasma membrane of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Cell Biol 148: 727–739, 2000. Yeaman C, Le Gall AH, Baldwin AN, Monlauzeur L, Le Bivic A, Rodriguez-Boulan E. The O-glycosylated stalk domain is required for apical sorting of neurotrophin receptors in polarized MDCK cells. J Cell Biol 139: 929 –940, 1997. Zafra F, Gimenez C. Molecular determinants involved in the asymmetrical distribution of glycine transporters in polarized cells. Biochem Soc Trans 29: 746 –750, 2001. Zheng X, Lu D, Sadler JE. Apical sorting of bovine enteropeptidase does not involve detergent-resistant association with sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts. J Biol Chem 274: 1596 –1605, 1999. 296 • MARCH 2009 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on June 17, 2017 84. pathway stabilizes its cellular conformation. Mol Biol Cell 15: 4031– 4042, 2004. Satoh T, Cowieson NP, Hakamata W, Ideo H, Fukushima K, Kurihara M, Kato R, Yamashita K, Wakatsuki S. Structural basis for recognition of high mannose type glycoproteins by mammalian transport lectin VIP36. J Biol Chem 282: 28246 –28255, 2007. Scheiffele P, Roth MG, Simons K. Interaction of influenza virus haemagglutinin with sphingolipid-cholesterol membrane domains via its transmembrane domain. EMBO J 16: 5501–5508, 1997. Schuck S, Simons K. Polarized sorting in epithelial cells: raft clustering and the biogenesis of the apical membrane. J Cell Sci 117: 5955–5964, 2004. Shimada O, Hara-Kuge S, Yamashita K, Tosaka-Shimada H, Yanchao L, Einan L, Atsumi S, Ishikawa H. Localization of VIP36 in the post-Golgi secretory pathway also of rat parotid acinar cells. J Histochem Cytochem 51: 1057–1063, 2003. Shimada O, Hara-Kuge S, Yamashita K, Tosaka-Shimada H, Yanchao L, Yongnan L, Atsumi S, Ishikawa H. Clusters of VIP-36positive vesicles between endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus in GH3 cells. Cell Struct Funct 28: 155–163, 2003. Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387: 569 –572, 1997. Simons K, Vaz WL. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 33: 269 –295, 2004. Skibbens JE, Roth MG, Matlin KS. Differential extractability of influenza virus hemagglutinin during intracellular transport in polarized epithelial cells and nonpolar fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 108: 821– 832, 1989. Sun AQ, Arrese MA, Zeng L, Swaby I, Zhou MM, Suchy FJ. The rat liver Na⫹/bile acid cotransporter. Importance of the cytoplasmic tail to F469
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz