GWOT Public Character Profiles (1) UNSC (2) Afghan Cabinet (3) Iraqi Council (4) Global Intelligence Committee United Nations Security Council United States of America The United States, since the September 11 terrorist attacks, has taken the position of global leader in the fight against Al-Qaeda and international terrorism. Their position on the Security Council must be used to support their ongoing mission in Afghanistan and secure the success and hopefully authorization for their impending intervention in Iraq. America’s position on the Security Council must also be used to wield the considerable financial, military and political powers at America’s disposal to fight terrorism and the political instability which leads to terrorism worldwide, and coordinate America’s actions with its allies and intelligence community. China China, despite not being a primary target of Al-Qaeda, does face danger from Islamic extremist terrorism. China’s Xinjiang province has a large Muslim Uyghur population who are highly unhappy with Chinese management of their province, which could break out into extreme violence. Thus, China certainly wishes to help the US and its allies contain Al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorism. However, the Chinese government wishes to use its role on the Security Council and its considerable might to ensure that the US led war on terrorism does not turn into an excuse for spreading US control and influence throughout the world, and so sees the planned invasion of Iraq as a dangerous potential stepping stone in this direction. China does hope though that this conflict might afford it an opportunity to expand its own sphere of influence throughout Southeast Asia. France France is a close ally of America and is willing to support them wholeheartedly in punishing those responsible for the 9/11 attacks and curbing the threat of international terrorism. However, France sees the planned invasion of Iraq as an unnecessary squandering of time, lives and money and a potential danger to America and the West’s reputation worldwide, and so is opposed to such an operation. France wishes to use its position on the Security Council to help coordinate Europe’s response to Islamic terrorism, assist the United States in any reasonable endeavours, and to preserve peace and stability worldwide. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland The UK is a staunch ally of the US, and is willing to support it completely in eliminating the threat of Islamic terrorism once and for all. They’re supportive of America’s planned invasion of Iraq, and Britain’s government wants to use its position on the Security Council to advocate on behalf of the US for its authorization. Britain’s Security Council delegate is also authorized to use Britain’s military, economic and political clout to help the US in stabilizing the Middle East and responding to other terrorist threats worldwide with particular attention to curbing those which might pose a threat to the UK. Russian Federation Russia has had experience in the past fighting against Islamic terrorists and insurgents, first as the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and later in Russia’s operations in Chechnya. They fully recognize the threat that this movement poses and are certainly willing to work with the US and its allies to combat it. However, like China, Russia fears that America might use the war to expand its influence throughout the world, and sees Iraq as just such an attempt. Russia though is looking to secure and expand its own political interests and control during this period of global danger. Spain Spain is an American ally and member of NATO, and while the Spanish public is highly anti-war, Spain’s government would like to use its Security Council seat to back the US invasion of Iraq. Spain intends to support American operations worldwide and back them in the Global War on Terror. However, Spain does not have the financial and military resources of America and the more powerful European allies, and so must be judicious in their use and focus on using them for only the most pressing of international threats or issues which pose a risk to Spain directly. Germany Germany is one of the wealthiest countries in Europe and a supportive US ally. However, the German people and government are highly critical of America’s intention to invade Iraq, and will attempt to use their position on the Security Council to curtail US ambition. Germany is also reluctant to use major military forces abroad, though it does have a handful of troops in Afghanistan as part of the ISAF mission there. The German government intends to support US counterterrorism efforts through participation in NATO missions and through financial means. Singapore Singapore is currently a supporter of the US invasion of Iraq, to a significant degree because of a free trade agreement being negotiated between America and Singapore. It will use its seat on the Security Council to support America. While Singapore itself is not immediately at threat from Islamic extremism, neighboring Malaysia and nearby India have very large Muslim populations and have fought and are fighting Islamic insurgencies. Thus, an increase in extremism amongst even a small percentage of either of those countries’ populations could pose a major threat to Singapore. Singapore thus is looking to help coordinate Southeast Asia’s response to Islamic extremism and terrorism in the region. Syrian Arab Republic The Syrian government is completely opposed to American intervention in Iraq; they resent more American involvement in the Middle East, and believe that the invasion of Iraq could destabilize the region even further and threaten their own country. The secular Syrian government however is well aware that Islamic extremist terrorism could also pose a major threat to its security. The Syrian government has thus placed significant resources at their delegate’s disposal, however much of Syria’s military is restricted to operations within the Middle East. Syria is also hoping to take on a leadership role and coordinate other Arab countries in resisting US military intervention in the Middle East and combatting terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda. Mexico Mexico, along with many other Latin American states is a vocal opponent of the Iraq invasion. While a close ally and major trade partner of America, Mexico thinks a war with Iraq is unnecessary and will cause major turmoil and suffering for the Iraq people and the Middle East more broadly. Mexico does however recognize the threat international terrorism poses and will work with the US closely to ensure its own, America’s and the world’s security. Mexico also believes it has a role to play in coordinating Latin America’s response more broadly against groups like Al-Qaeda. Colombia Colombia is notable as the only Latin American state to support the US-led Iraqi invasion. Colombia receives significant economic, military and policing support from the US, in part to do with the War on Drugs and thus maintaining strong relations with the US is extremely important. Columbia like Mexico does recognize the danger of Islamic extremist terrorism, and will support efforts to contain and eliminate it. Also like Mexico, the Colombian government sees the organization of wider Latin American counter-terror organizational as a potential way to ameliorate the paucity of counterterror resources each state can contribute. Guinea Guinea, like other African states on the Security Council, is in a delicate position with respect to the US and Iraq. The African Union and many members have condemned a potential war against Iraq, however Guinea receives significant American financial aid and so must balance the potential loss of American support versus the loss of face amongst other African countries. Otherwise, Guinea is a majority Sunni Muslim state but with a strong secular tradition, and the spread of Islamic extremism to West Africa in a major way would pose a major threat to Guinea. Thus Guinea aims to help contain the movement worldwide. Cameroon Cameroon like Mauritius and Guinea face the difficulty of choosing between siding with the African Union in condemning an American assault on Iraq, or supporting the US who provide important economic aid to the country. Cameroon does have a significant Muslim minority population, and so the expansion of Islamic extremism into Central Africa may become very dangerous for Cameroon, as even if a tiny quantity of its Muslim population is swayed by the messages of Al-Qaeda and likeminded groups great instability could result. Mauritius Like the other African states on the council, Mauritius receives considerable aid form the United States, and so is susceptible to American pressure to support the invasion of Iraq. However, the African Union and many African states have voiced their opposition to such an American move, and siding with the Americans could have repercussions amongst other eastern and southern African States. Mauritius’ long-time European partners, Britain and France, are also divided on the issue, and so Mauritius must tread very carefully during buildup to the invasion of Iraq. Bulgaria Bulgaria has thrown its lot in with the US on the invasion of Afghanistan, largely because Bulgaria hopes to join NATO shortly and America’s goodwill is a major prerequisite. Bulgaria may even be open to, like Poland, militarily supporting American efforts in Iraq. Bulgaria does contain a significant Sunni minority, and so does have a stake in seeing the spread of Islamic extremism halted. Bulgaria is also looking to take a leading role in organizing Eastern European states’ counterterror efforts. Amnesty International Amnesty International’s primary purpose is to ensure the protection of Human Rights worldwide and ensure states respect Human Rights. They have been invited to sit on the Security Council as a non-voting observer to help gather information on human rights abuses worldwide and point the council to hotspots of potential conflict and major Human Rights abuses which may require the Security Council’s attention. They will also act as the world’s watchdog, attempting to ensure that the states of the Security Council itself and their allies do not conduct Human Rights abuses in their fight against international Islamic terrorism and if they do, then to bring pressure against them to conform to international Human Rights law. Oxfam International Oxfam International is a major global development NGO whose primary goal is to ameliorate global poverty and encourage and support Human Rights. They have been invited to sit on the Security Council as a non-voting observer to bring the perspective of development NGOs to the table, and to help in the fight against global terrorism by ensuring that conditions which cause terrorism, such as poverty, high unemployment and lack of participation in the political process, amongst others, are addressed by the states of the Security Council. Afghan Cabinet Commander European ISAF: Lieutenant General Goetz Gliemeroth Lieutenant General Goetz Gliemeroth is an officer in the German Bundeswher, or defense forces. He’s an experienced career soldier and NATO commander, having served in the army for over 40 years. As of March 2003, he is the Commander of the International Security Assistance force, or ISAF, in Afghanistan and must oversee NATO’s assumption of formal control over the force. Gliemeroth maintains direct control over the non-English speaking elements of the army, and must use them to root out the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, assist the fledgling Afghan government assert control of the country against the numerous warlords, and secure a safe environment for development and state building to take place in. Commander Anglo ISAF: Lieutenant General Rick Hillier Lieutenant General Rick Hillier is an officer in the Canadian Forces with 30 years of experience, including as part of NATO’s intervention in the Yugoslav wars. He’s been assigned to the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) as a senior commander to assist General Gliemeroth. Specifically, General Hillier has been given command over the English-speaking elements of the force, including British, Australian and his own Canadian troops. His responsibilities include supporting General Gliemeroth to the best of his ability, destroying anti-government forces as necessary and protecting civilians to enable economic growth and development. Commander American Forces: Lieutenant General John Vines Lieutenant General John Vines is a distinguished American commander with more than 30 years in the army and commanding large troop formations. He’s been given command over most American ground troops in the country, though must still answer to the Allied Commander General Barno, and rely on Barno for Special Forces assistance and air support. Vines’ main responsibilities revolve around finding and destroying Taliban and especially Al-Qaeda strongholds in Afghanistan and recovering as much information as possible from them to prevent more attacks on US soil. If necessary Vines, may also seek permission to launch incursions into Pakistan and neighboring countries if insurgents are found to be hiding there. Joint Allied Commander: Lieutenant General David Barno Lieutenant General David Barno is a capable and experienced American general who has been placed in overall command of the international forces operating in Afghanistan. He controls most of the Coalition’s air support and Special Forces assets, and is responsible for coordinating the operations and objectives of his subordinates Vines, Hillier and Gliemeroth. Barno must balance America’s goals of destroying the Taliban and Al-Qaeda with the new Afghan government’s desire to solidify its control of its own country, which means confronting or coopting local warlords. Barno must also cooperate with the various civilian officials within the country responsible for economic and political development and humanitarian aid, including the USAID Mission Director Patrick Fine and UN Envoy Lakhdar Brahimi. USAID Mission Director Patrick Fine Patrick Fine has worked most of his life in aid work, and most of that within USAID, and so has great experience in development. However, with very limited resources, Fine must attempt to relieve the crushing poverty endemic to Afghanistan, help combat various diseases, promote education, particularly amongst girls, and jump start the Afghan economy. His overall goal is to help create a stable, prosperous country which will be able to resist future efforts to transform the state into a breeding ground for extremist terrorists. UN Special Envoy for Afghanistan Lakhdar Brahimi Lakhdar Brahimi is an Algerian politician and career diplomat with a long history at the UN. Brahimi will have to keep the Security Council and General Assembly informed of developments in Afghanistan, and if further Security Council or other UN initiatives in the country become necessary, Brahimi will be primarily responsible for raising and organizing that support. Brahimi will also lead the UN mission to Afghanistan, and so be responsible for the distribution of significant aid money and lead several humanitarian campaigns. President Hamid Karzai Karzai is was elected leader of the transitional government of Afghanistan for two years by a Loya Jirga in 2002, and as such must rule the country as it transitions away from Taliban governance to a new democracy. Karzai acted as a mujahedeen fundraiser through the Soviet occupation of the country, and acted as a prominent leader in the Durrani tribal confederation, a loose but powerful alliance of Pashtun tribes active in southern Afghanistan and Pakistan. Karzai must prepare for the looming elections in 2004, both to secure the country so that the elections can take place, and ensure his popularity remains high so that he can win them. Karzai must also manage and coordinate the efforts of his ministers and the American and Coalition troops in the country to ensure Afghanistan is governed effectively. Defense Minister Mohammed Fahim Fahim was a prominent leader of the Northern Alliance movement, and was responsible for taking the capital Kabul with American assistance during the US invasion of the country in 2001. Since then, Fahim’s militia have largely been responsible for keeping order in the capital, and helping establish government control over the immediate surroundings. Fahim as minister of defense has three primary obligations; he must develop and build the Afghan security forces into a capable army, he must help establish government control over large parts of warlord controlled territory, and he must fight the remnants of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in the country and ensure they don’t gain enough power to become a threat to the regime. Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah Abdullah Abdullah worked as an advisor to famed Northern Alliance commander Ahmed Shah Massoud, and so retains some connections to that movement and its former commanders. Abdullah now, having been named Foreign Minister, must represent the Afghan government and protect Afghan interests abroad. To that effect he will be the principal negotiator with any foreign state or major international entity, including the UN Security Council. Abdullah also may harbour some political ambitions, and limited polls show he’s fairly well respected throughout the country, and of mixed Pashtun-Tajik ethnicity, he has a fairly broad appeal. Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani Ashraf Ghani is a very capable economist, having spent considerable time with the World Bank before returning to Afghanistan to become finance minister. His chief role is to oversee the economic development of the country, and take it from an unbelievably poor nation to a prosperous, self-sufficient state. Currently, the vast majority of government revenue comes from international aid donors, as the state controls very little of the country and so has trouble collecting taxes, and what part of the country the state does control are quite poor. Thus Ghani must encourage spreading the influence of the government to other parts of the country, and encourage economic growth in those parts which the government does control. Interior Minister Ali Ahmad Jalali Ali Jalali is an Afghan American and a well-known professor on strategy and security matters. He’s become the interior minister of Afghanistan, a role that primarily involves overseeing the fledgling police force of the country. He will have to expand and build up the police, ensure that they are performing effectively, root out corruption in their ranks, and coordinate their cooperation with Afghan National Army troops, as well as those of America and its Coalition partners to protect civilians and re-establish control of the central government over the country. Deputy Minister of Defense Abdul Rahim Wardak General Wardak is an experienced Pashtun Mujahedeen commander who fought the Soviets during their occupation of the country. His role as deputy minister of defense is to help with formulating defense policy and plan military operations and if need be to lead troops himself. However, his main role is to act as a watchdog and counterpoint to the defense minister Mohammed Fahim. Fahim, while quite capable, controls a large militia which is the primary means of keeping order within the capital Kabul, and so if the notion took him, become a real danger to the new Afghan government. Wardak is also popular with many minority groups in Afghanistan, being descended from several Pashtun chiefs with close friendships with some of the northern ethnic groups. Lieutenant General Walizadah General Walizadah is a capable Afghan commander, having fought in several of conflicts which have plagued the country through the preceding several decades. He’s been placed in command of the 1 st Brigade, the primary formation of the new Afghan National Army (ANA). As such a lot is riding on his ability to demonstrate that Afghan troops can effectively fight the Taliban and impartially carry out the orders of the central government, and help secure its control over the under governed and warlord controlled provinces. Warlord: Governor Ismail Khan Ismail Khan is an experienced guerilla fighter and warlord, having risen to prominence during the war against the Soviets in the 1980s. He along with most of his fighters is a Tajik, and so has significant influence throughout Tajik regions of Afghanistan. He’s styled himself as the Emir of Hirat, and has a complicated relationship with the central government. While he’s not opposed to them on a fundamental basis, he wants to keep himself as independent from them as possible and to continue to rule over the west of the country. General Abdul Rashid Dostum General Dostum is an Uzbek warlord, famed for his role in the Afghan Civil War following the departure of the Soviets in 1989 and his subsequent participation on the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. He’s quite popular amongst the minority Uzbek ethnic group, and so not only has great influence in the northwest of Afghanistan, but he has the capacity to become a major political player in the central government should he so choose. Iraqi Council Lieutenant General David McKiernan General McKiernan is an experienced American commander, having fought in the Gulf War in 1991 and having commanded a variety of American army units throughout his career. McKiernan now finds himself supreme commander of American and allied troops undertaking the invasion of Iraq. McKiernan must then coordinate the efforts of his subordinates to plan and execute the invasion, and then the occupation of Iraq. He must then oversee the transformation of Iraqi security forces into an effective, apolitical modern army loyal to the new regime, and cooperate with American and Iraqi civilian officials to oversee Iraq’s transition into an economically successful, peaceful democratic country. McKiernan must also oversee the search for Iraqi WMDs during and after the invasion. Lieutenant General William Wallace General Wallace is an experienced American officer, having fought in Vietnam and the Gulf War. General Wallace has been placed in command of the American 5th Corps for the invasion of Iraq. Alongside General Conway’s marines, Wallace’s 5 th Corps provides the other main arm of American ground troops during the invasion. The 5 th Corps is predominantly comprised of mechanized infantry, tanks and airborne and heliborne air assault infantry, well suited to fast overland attacks deep into enemy territory. Wallace will have to coordinate with the other American and British commanders during the invasion, and following the invasion attempt to occupy the country. Lieutenant General James Conway General Conway is an experienced United States Marine Corps veteran having served in the Gulf War and commanded marines for three decades. Conway has been placed in charge of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, and will be directly responsible for a large portion of the invasion of Iraq. His marines are particularly well suited to amphibious invasions and urban warfare. Conway must coordinate his marine’s efforts with the other Coalition generals Wallace, Petraeus and Wall. Conway will also report to General McKiernan, the supreme commander of the invasion force. Conway then must ensure that the Iraqi troops he fights are destroyed as quickly and efficiently as possible while mitigating his own and civilian casualties, no easy task. Conway must, following the invasion, help pacify and occupy Iraq, and coordinate his efforts with Iraqi and coalition civilian officials. Major General David Petraeus Major General Petraeus is a promising if inexperienced American officer who has been placed in command of the 101 st Airborne division under General Wallace. However, Special Operations Command Central has recommended that Petraeus be placed in charge of Task Forces Dagger and Viking, two combat formations comprising primarily of highly mobile airborne and heliborne infantry and Special Forces. Should Petraeus be confirmed in this position, he will largely be responsible for coordinating Special Forces operations such as raids, reconnaissance, capturing or eliminating high value targets and training friendly forces during the invasion and afterwards during the occupation with other Coalition commanders. General Sir Peter Wall General Peter Wall is a career British soldier who has served in the various peacekeeping efforts to end the Yugoslav wars. He has been placed in command of the British contingent in the invasion of Iraq, and must now work with his American colleagues and anti-Saddam Iraqi counterparts to ensure the success of the American invasion and following occupation. Wall commands a variety of British military assets, from attack aircraft to Special Forces to the main land component, and this coupled with his separation from the main American command structure allows him a degree of flexibility and independence in his actions. President of Coalition Provisional Authority Paul Bremer Paul Bremer has had a distinguished career in the State Department and private sector, and has made a name for himself as a counterterror expert. President Bush has informed Bremer that he will lead the Coalition provisional Authority following the successful invasion of Iraq. Bremer’s responsibilities will then include restructuring the Iraqi economy from a state dominated system to a functioning market economy, creating a new Iraqi government, police and army, ensuring democratic elections are held I a fairly timely manner and securing the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi populace. During the invasion, Bremer should be working with his military counterparts to ensure that following the invasion, Coalition troops are in an effective position throughout the country to carry out the Provisional Authority’s edicts. Vice President of Coalition Provisional Authority Jeremy Greenstock Jeremy Greenstock will be Britain’s representative on the Coalition Provisional Authority in the event of a Coalition victory in Iraq. Greenstock’s role will be to help Paul Bremer administer and govern the country following the invasion, create a new government, and reform the military and police forces, and to coordinate with the British military commander General Wall. Greenstock will ensure Britain maintains a voice in the nonmilitary aspects of Iraq’s governance, and may even petition for other European powers to get involved in the post-war occupation and reconstruction efforts, in which case Greenstock would manage their resources and act as their voice as well. Nechervan Barzani Nechervan Barzani is a leader in the secular Kurdish Democratic Party, and has been helping to rule the near independent region of Iraqi Kurdistan following the Gulf War as Coalition imposed no fly zones helped keep Iraqi troops away from the region. As the leader of the KDP, Barzani must manage relations with the other main Kurdish party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, and Kurdish groups in Syria and Turkey. Barzani is very willing to work with the Americans to defeat Saddam, and hopes that an American run Iraq will grant Kurdistan considerable autonomy or even independence and the creation of a Kurdish state. Sheikh Abdul Sattar Sheikh Abdul Sattar is a Sunni tribal leader, and holds a great degree of influence amongst Iraq’s Sunni minority in the northeast of the country, particularly in his home Al-Anbar province. He’s willing to work with the Americans should Saddam be defeated to combat anti-Western elements within Iraq. Sattar does however want to ensure that Iraq’s Sunni minority is not sidelined in a new government. Sattar is also looking to exploit the potential chaos of a defeated Iraq to improve his own position in it. Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani Grand Ayatollah Al-Sistani is the most senior Shia cleric in Iraq, and the spiritual leader of Iraq’s Shia community, the majority of Iraq’s population. Al-Sistani was not a supporter of Saddam’s Ba’ath party rule, and is very willing to work with the Americans, should they successfully oust Saddam to create better lives for his congregation. AlSistani firmly believes that fair and democratic including all Iraqis should be held, and that Iraqi Sunnis, Shias and Kurds should cohabitate Iraq peacefully. However, Al-Sistani does wish to ensure Iraq’s majority Shia population is represented effectively in government, and their interests protected if a new government is instated. Prime Minister Designate Ayad Allawi Ayad Allawi is a former Ba’ath party member and long-time opponent of Saddam Hussein. Allawi founded the Iraqi National Accord, an anti-Saddam network spanning much of the globe and with significant presence within Iraq, which receives US backing and support. Allawi has been tapped by the Americans to, following the invasion, head the transitional government and hopefully become Iraq’s democratically elected leader. Allawi then must help provide intelligence to Coalition forces during the invasion, and attempt to mitigate the damage they cause to the Iraqi populace and infrastructure which will make rebuilding the country more difficult. Allawi will also have a significant say in what form Iraq’s new government will take. Foreign Minister Designate Hoshyar Zabari Hoshyar Zabari is a Jordanian and British educated Kurd with experience as a leader in the KDP and fighting Saddam’s troops as part of the Peshmerga. Zabari has been selected to, following the invasion, act as Iraq’s new foreign minister. Zabari must then represent Iraqi interests abroad, and perhaps more importantly, attempt to secure Iraq more allies and aid donors within the Security Council and UN to help secure and rebuild the country following the invasion. Zabari should also look to advance Kurdish interests after the conflict. Defense Minister Designate Hazim al-Khuzaei Hazim al-Khuzaei is a Shia economist who has been asked to be the defence minister once Saddam’s government is ousted. As defence minister, al-Khuzaei must reform or disband the Iraqi army and create a new security force. Al-Khuzaei must then attempt to train and equip that force to the degree that they are capable of taking responsibility for Iraq’s security from the Coalition. Al-Khuzaei will also be responsible for retraining and equipping Iraq’s police forces. Finance Minister Designate Ali Allawi Ali Allawi is a professor at Oxford University, and the son of an old Iraqi family heavily involved in the country’s government during the Hashemite monarchy. Allawi is connected to the Iraqi National Congress through family, and so has some influence within the organization. Allawi has been asked to serve as the finance minister of Iraq following a coalition victory, and so will be responsible for managing Iraq budget and reconstruction. This will entail development projects, managing Iraq’s oil wealth, helping Paul Bremer and the Coalition Provisional Authority reform Iraq’s economy and a host of other issues. UN Secretary-General's Special Representative in Iraq Sérgio de Mello Sergio de Mello is a career Brazilian diplomat and has worked for the UN for more than 30 years, including as the UN Transitional Administrator for East Timor. He’s heavily committed to human rights, however recognizes the necessity of force from time to time in curbing terrorism and protecting civilians. His role as the Special Representative in Iraq means de Mello will be responsible for conducting all UN activity in the country, and coordinate humanitarian and reconstruction efforts with various UN agencies. He must also act as the Security Council’s eyes and ears in the country and attempt to carry out any policies they set. De Mello will also work with WMD inspectors to verify the American government’s claims that Saddam possesses WMDs. Intelligence Agencies Committee American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) The CIA has been authorized to use a plethora of resources to help prosecute the war on terror. Their representative will have to gather intelligence to assist and coordinate the efforts of the American military in Iraq and Afghanistan and their ambassador to the Security Council, while conducting their own operations to disrupt and ultimately destroy terrorist networks like Al-Qaeda. The CIA’s representative will have to work with the intelligence agencies of other countries to end the threat to the United States and the rest of the world, but must bear in mind that some of these agencies are rivals and working against the US in other areas and so are not to be completely trusted. Chinese Ministry of State Security The Chinese Ministry of State Security representative must do their utmost to protect China from the dangers of Islamic extremist terrorist groups. They will work, albeit somewhat warily, with the intelligence services of other countries to that effect. They will also however be looking for ways to use this cooperation to their advantage; if weaknesses in rival intelligence organizations can be found and exploited China will certainly be in a better position on the international stage. Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, descended from the KGB of the Cold War era, has had decades of experience helping the Russian state combat insurgents, most recently during the Russian-Chechnyan conflict. The SVR will work with its counterparts from other countries, but views many of those counterparts as opponents and so will potentially look to undermine their activities where Russian interests can be furthered. French General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) The representative of the French DGSE is fully prepared to work with France’s allies and other major intelligence organizations to defeat global terrorism. Their representative will have to work with France’s Security Council ambassador to keep them informed and provide them with relevant intelligence. British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) MI6 has a long history of cooperation with many of the intelligence agencies within the committee, and will continue that tradition in combatting Al-Qaeda and groups like it. MI6’s representative must work closely with Britain’s delegates in The Security Council and Iraqi Transitional Administration to exchange intelligence and cooperate in operations. MI6 is also aware that working closely with America and other states to fight Al-Qaeda may make Britain itself a target, and so must work tirelessly to protect its citizens. Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) The ISI’s representative is in a very delicate position. The ISI has close ties to the Taliban and other Islamic extremist groups in order to threaten India and maintain their own predominant position within Pakistani politics. Therefore, the ISI’s representative must walk a very fine line between helping America and the other global intelligence agencies in their campaign and protecting their own interests. Israeli Mossad Israel’s Mossad has been fighting various Islamic insurgent groups since the state’s inception, and so has considerable experience infiltrating such organizations. Mossad’s chief concern however remains Israel’s security and the safety of its citizens, and so is wary of working with certain intelligence organizations which in the past and potentially still do support terrorist networks working against Israel. Nigerian National Intelligence Agency Nigeria’s National Intelligence Agency will be primarily responsible for gathering intelligence and combating extremist networks throughout Africa, and particularly West Africa. Nigerian National Intelligence knows that working against extremist groups like Al-Qaeda makes Niger a target, and so ensuring Nigeria’s own security will remain of high importance. Indian Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) The Indian intelligence representative has a challenging task; they must do their best to help the rest of the world’s intelligence agencies combat Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups while constantly being on guard against Pakistan’s ISI. The ISI has been supporting various terrorist groups launching attacks against India and fighting for the secession of Indian Kashmir, so the Indian delegate must constantly be working to protect India from attacks. Brazilian Intelligence Agency Brazil does not face an immediate threat from international Islamic terrorism. However, Brazil wants to take a leadership role amongst Latin American states and work with its international partners to combat this threat. The Brazilian representative will be responsible largely for protecting and conducting counterterror operations in Latin America, and for working with his counterpart on the Security Council to create a grand Latin American counterterror organization. Saudi Arabian General Intelligence Presidency (GIP) Saudi Arabia is certainly at risk of attacks by Al-Qaeda and likeminded networks due its status as an American ally. As such the GIP’s representative must work to guarantee Saudi Arabia’s own security, and then to eliminate Al-Qaeda and other extremist groups which pose a threat to Saudi interests in the Middle East, and simultaneously to secure Saudi Arabia as the dominant regional power. Turkish National Intelligence Organization Turkey’s Intelligence community has had much experience combatting terrorist groups operating within its borders, mainly Kurdish separatist groups. Turkey must work with its European, American and global partners to supress Islamic extremist groups in the Middle East before they can establish a foothold in Turkey and threaten its secular political tradition. Turkey must also attempt to prevent Kurdish groups in Syria and Iraq becoming too powerful and supporting Kurdish groups within Turkey as a result of partnering with America against Al-Qaeda or Saddam’s government. Australian Secret Intelligence Agency (ASIS) Australia’s representative must work with its traditional American and European allies to help protect their and Australia’s own security by supressing Islamic extremist groups worldwide, though particularly in Southeast Asia where a spike in extremist activity would pose the most threat to Australia. To that effect, Australia should look to cooperate closely with Indonesian intelligence, and take advantage of New Zealander intelligence organizations which cooperate closely with their Australian colleagues. German Federal Intelligence Service Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service must work with their European and American allies to combat Al-Qaeda in the Middle East and elsewhere and prevent attacks on their own states. Germany should look to act as a counterweight to more aggressive American tactics, and to coordinate intelligence and operations with German and other European Union members on the Security Council. Indonesian State Intelligence Agency (BIN) Indonesia has fought several Islamist insurgencies since its independence and so BIN has experience infiltrating and supressing insurgent organizations. Indonesia’s representative must put this experience to use primarily to prevent the spread of Al-Qaeda or its affiliates into Indonesia or the Southeast Asian region where they could exploit the region’s large Muslim populations to pose a significant security risk to the region’s governments. To this end, BIN’s representative should look to cooperate with the Australian, Chinese and Indian intelligence agencies to prevent this eventuality.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz