(
STAFF REPORT
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
GREG RAY, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #312 - TRAIN STATION EXPANSION
PROJECT
BACKGROUND
Since the completion of the Amtrak train station in 1996, the bus facilities have been located on
the east side of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, while the train facilities have been located on
the west side of the tracks at the southeast corner of Highway 1 and West Grand Avenue.
Because this reduces the efficiency and convenience of the transfer between busses and the
train, in 2008 the Council selected a preferred alternative that would relocate the bus drop off to
the west side of the tracks on the property to the south of the train station owned by San Luis
Obispo County. This would integrate the rail and bus operations to create a multi-modal facility.
In October 2008, the City, San Luis Obispo County and San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments (SLOCOG) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to work
together on expanding the existing train station (reference Attachment 3).
The project was incorporated in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in 2009
consistent with the Council's adopted goal to expand the train station. In the last two years, a
biological survey of the site was completed, Rick Engineering was hired to prepare a conceptual
grading and site plan, and Rincon Consultants was selected to prepare an Initial Study and
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). In addition, City staff has worked with Caltrans
staff to address access issues to the site and worked with San Luis Obispo County Park's staff
to ensure their goals were met to provide future access to the Coastal Dunes Recreational
Vehicle (RV) Park operated by the County.
The conceptual project for Council consideration would expand the train station to the south
incorporating a bus passenger loading/unloading area, a bus shelter, and approximately 40
additional parking spaces. The existing ingress/egress would be eliminated and a main entry
point would be relocated further south. A second phase to be constructed by the County would
include the construction of an additional entry driveway and kiosk to the existing Coastal Dunes
RV Park.
Please Review for the Possibility of a
Potential Conflict of Interest:
o None Identified by Staff 0 Bright
Shoals
0 Molnar
Nicolls
iW'Peterson
o
o
Meeting Date: February 21. 2012
Agenda Item No.
a
Staff Report: CfP #312 Train Station Expansion Project
February 21, 2012
Page 2
The project site is located in the Coastal Zone and requires approval of a Coastal Development
Permit (CDP). It is requested that the City Council conduct a public hearing and consider
adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Coastal Development Permit for Capital
Improvement Project (CIP) #312 to expand the existing train station. Consistent with other CIP
projects, this item was brought directly to the Council for consideration and not reviewed by the
Planning Commission.
DISCUSSION
The current General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Planned Commercial and the
zoning is Coastal Planned Commercial. The proposed project would meet several Council
goals and improve the operations of the transit center as follows:
• Create a fully functional multi-modal transit center that would serve Amtrak trains and
busses with seamless connections for visitors and commuters via regional and local bus,
van pooling/carpooling and bicycle;
• Further encourage and enhance the use of alternative transportation modes to access
the coast and other parts of the County and reduce vehicle trips;
• Provide ample parking for train and bus riders, vanpooling/carpooling and future
trailhead;
• Combine the train and bus passenger loading areas to improve operations;
• Create a clear and direct pedestrian and visual linkage between the two loading areas,
particularly for disabled passengers;
• Provide a safe pedestrian and bicycle connection from the existing recreational vehicle
park to the beach via the Highway 1 and West Grand Avenue intersection which would
increase coastal access consistent with the Coastal Act;
• Allow for convenient use of the existing restrooms for bus passengers;
• Allow for a future connection with the regional South County Area Transit (SCAT) buses
for seamless transfers; and
• Provide efficient site security for passengers.
Site Plan
The project site has several constraints that dictated the project design. These include the
limited site depth, a 7-10 percent slope from east to west, access constraints onto Highway 1,
the presence of wetlands, limited use of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and a high
ground water table that affects infiltration. Based on these constraints, Rick Engineering has
prepared a conceptual site plan for the proposed project (reference Attachment 7).
The proposed project would be constructed in two phases on the 2.8 acre site. Phase 1
consisting of approximately 1.3 acres would be developed by the City and include expansion of
the existing Amtrak train station to create a multi-modal transit center. Phase·1 would include
the construction of a 400 square foot bus shelter and loading/unloading zone with direct access
to the rail platform, a traffic circle entry statement, landscaping, and retention basin. The parking
area, consisting of approximately 40 additional parking spaces, would allow for additional short
and long-term parking by transit users, park and ride opportunities, and could serve as future
trailhead parking for accessing trails/bikepaths, consistent with the City's Bicycle Master Plan.
In addition, a pedestrian/bicycle path would be constructed that would allow for safe access
between the existing 232-space Coastal Dunes RV Park and the intersection of Highway 1 and
West Grand Avenue. This would be beneficial for improving access to the beach and the visitor
serving area on West Grand Avenue.
Staff Report: CIP #312 Train Station Expansion Project
February 21, 2012
Page 3
Phase 2 of the project would be developed by San Luis Obispo County Parks when funding
became available. The proposed project would provide an additional vehicle entrance to the
Coastal Dunes RV Park. Additional improvements would include a one-way driveway and a 400
square-foot entry kiosk and office. A future RV Park expansion area/campground could also be
developed adjacent to the entry.
Coastal Zone
The proposed project is located in the Coastal Zone. City staff has discussed the project with
Coastal staff since the project's inception. Coastal staff provided a letter to the City in
November 2010 indicating their general support for the project and recommendation that the
project footprint be minimized and the project be sited and designed as much as possible to
maintain on-site resources (reference Attachment 4). Accordingly, the project has been
designed to retain and mitigate on-site for federal wetlands and integrate willow habitat into the
basin design (reference additional discussion in the Biological Resources Section of the staff
report). The project is appealable to the Coastal Commission based on its definition as a "public
works" project as defined by the Coastal Act.
PoUcy Consistency
Land Use Policy 6.3 states the following:
Multi-modal Transit Center. The 2.3 acre parcel on State Route 1 immediately adjacent to
the existing train station is an appropriate location for the expansion of transit-related
facilities to serve the City and region. Development of this site should incorporate the
following features:
a. A range of uses to complement the train station and serve the transit needs of the City
and region and emphasizing visitor serving commercial development as provided by the
Local Coastal Plan. Because of noise and other compatibility issues associated with the
adjacent railroad and State Route 1, Mixed-Use development with residential uses is
prohibited.
b. Improved access to the County recreational vehicle park and possible improvement of
additional camping facilities.
c. Pedestrian and bicycle connections to the train station, the beach and surrounding
visitor-serving development and the County recreational vehicle park.
d. Parking for transit/train patrons and businesses.
e. A design that will mitigate for the loss of the small, degraded Federal wetland area
utilizing low-impact development features.
The proposed project has been designed to incorporate the above features and/or allow for
future visitor serving uses; therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the Land Use
Element. The City's Local Coastal Program (LCP) designates the project site for coastal
commercial uses. The project is consistent with this goal and would also enhance coastal
access by providing a safe pedestrian connection from the Coastal Dunes RV Park to the
intersection of Highway 1 and West Grand Avenue. The project is also consistent with LCP
policies regarding visual quality and storm drain retention requirements.
The project is also consistent with the City's Economic Development Strategy. The integrated
and expanded facility would better serve the community and travelers using the facilities and
future guests of the Grover Beach Lodge. The project is also consistent with the West Grand
Avenue Master Plan by further improving one of the existing amenities in the City's visitor
serving area and promoting alternative modes of transportation. The project would also visually
improve and enhance the City's southern gateway.
Staff Report: CIP #312 Train Station Expansion Project
February 21, 2012
Page 4
Development Standards
The proposed project has 50% lot coverage with buildings and parking areas, which is below
the maximum 60% lot coverage permitted in the Coastal Planned Commercial Zone. The
project would also provide 50% of lot area to landscaping and open areas, which exceeds the
required 40%. The project also meets all development standards for setbacks and structure
heights.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City retained Rincon Consultants to prepare an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND). The IS/MND identified potential impacts to air quality, biological
resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, and hydrology (reference Attachment 6). The
IS/MND was circulated for a 30 day comment period and letters were received from the San
Luis Obispo Public Works Department, Caltrans, the Public Utilities Commission, SLOCOG, and
the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) (reference Attachment 6, Appendix D). A summary of
the potential environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures are provided below.
Air Quality
The project is expected to result in a slight decrease in vehicle trips and have a beneficial
impact on air quality. Construction activities are anticipated to have a less than significant
impact to air quality. However, standard mitigation measures have been included to reduce
fugitive dust and construction emissions.
Biological Resources
A biological survey was conducted for the site and no rare or endangered species were found.
However, because the site could serve as habitat for nesting birds, a mitigation measure has
been included requiring a pre-construction survey during the nesting season to ensure the
absence of any protected species.
A wetland delineation was conducted and found 0.16 acres of wetlands that met the three
parameter federal criteria. The project has been designed to retain as much of the wetland as
possible, but approximately 0.07 acres would need to be filled in order to provide site access
from Highway 1. Therefore, impacts to federal wetlands would be mitigated on-site at a 1: 1
ratio. The City will need to obtain a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Regional
Water Quality Control Board prior to construction.
In addition, the site has approximately 1.70 acres of one parameter wetlands (i.e., Willow
woodland habitat) as defined by the Coastal Act. The project has been designed to retain as
much of the Willow habitat as possible, but approximately 1.26 acres would be impacted. This
will require off-site mitigation at a 2: 1 ratio or the payment of in-lieu fees to a mitigation bank, if
available.
Cultural Resources
An archaeological survey of the site was conducted and no cultural resources were found. A
standard mitigation measure has been added in case any resources were found during
construction.
Geology/Soils
The site is subject to moderate liquefaction and settlement potential. Consistent with City
policy, a geotechnical study will be prepared for the site and recommended measures to
minimize risks will be incorporated into the project design.
Staff Report: CIP #312 Train Station Expansion Project
February 21, 2012
Page 5
Hydrology
A preliminary drainage study was prepared by the Public Works Director, which estimated that
increased runoff volume as a result of impervious surfaces would be approximately 31,000
cubic feet. Although there is adequate area on the site to retain the water, the depth to ground
water and encroachment of the 100 year flood plain onto the site could affect the size of the
basin. The result could require the basin to be expanded onto the County's area of the site that
is currently used for RV storage. Therefore, upon completion of the final drainage study,
geotechnical study and construction plans, the exact size and location of the basins would be
determined. If the ultimate location of the basin affected the County's current useable area, the
lease agreement with the County could take this into consideration.
POST ENTITLEMENT PROCESS
If the project is approved as proposed, a series of additional steps will need to take place, prior
to start of construction as discussed below.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Additional Project Funding - The City will need to pursue additional funding from
SLOCOG and/or other sources.
Geotechnical Study/Soils Testing - A geotechnical consultant will need to be retained to
conduct an on-site investigation and prepare a geotechnical report.
Construction Documents -Staff will prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) and select a
consultant to prepare the plans.
Land Lease with San Luis Obispo County - This will need to be negotiated with the
County consistent with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding.
Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit - A biological consultant will need to be
retained to assist with the preparation and permitting process with the Army Corps and
other associated permit applications.
Caltrans Encroachment Permit - The City will need to submit construction plans to
Caltrans to obtain an encroachment permit to allow construction within the State
Highway 1 right-of-way.
Union Pacific Encroachment Permit - The City will need to submit construction plans to
Union Pacific to obtain an encroachment permit to allow the construction of the bus lane
within the railroad right-of-way.
.
CLOMR/LOMR - Depending on the outcome of the hydrology study, the City may need
to hire a consultant to prepare a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to modify
the 1~O-year storm floodplain boundary.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Adopt a Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving Coastal
Development Permit for Capital Improvement ProjeCt #312; or
2. Provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council 1) conduct the public hearing, receive testimony;
2) adopt theResolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and 3) adopt the
Resolution approving the Coastal Development Permit for Capital Improvement Project #312.
Staff Report: CIP #312 Train Station Expansion Project
February 21, 2012
Page 6
FISCAL IMPACT
In April 2011, SLOCOG programmed a three year allocation of Proposition 1B transit monies
totaling $6,200,000 of which the City has been programmed to receive $1,000,000. The
Engineer's Preliminary Cost Estimate for the project based on the conceptual plan is $1,560,000
in construction costs and $400,000 for soft costs (reference Attachment 5). The cost estimate
will be more accurate based on the preparation of the construction documents. However,
additional funding will be necessary to fully fund the project.
The cost to prepare the construction documents is estimated between $125,000 - $150,000
including a geotechnical study and all permitting costs. The range of estimated costs is high
because of the preliminary nature of the plans, unknown soils conditions, and the difficulty in
predicting the permitting costs associated with the Caltrans Encroachment Permit, the Union
Pacific Encroachment Permit, and the Army Corps Nationwide Permit. The cost of construction
documents are not eligible for funding by Proposition 1B funds. The City currently has $106,000
in Local Transit Funds (LTF) designated for design of Ramona Garden Phase 3 improvements.
If the project is approved by the Council, staff will return with a budget amendment to transfer
the $106,000 in LTF funds to this project. However, it would appear that the $106,000 is not
sufficient to cover the full cost of preparing construction documents for bid; therefore, additional
funding by the City may be needed prior to completion of construction documents.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
On February 10, 2012, the public hearing notice was published in the Tribune. All property
owners located within 300 feet of the property and all occupants within 100 feet of the property
were mailed a public hearing notice. In addition, all agencies who commented on the Draft
IS/MND or persons requesting notification were mailed a public hearing notice. The project was
posted as required by City code and the agenda posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Draft Resolution Adopting the IS/MND
Draft Resolution Approving the Coastal Development Permit
MOU With San Luis Obispo County & SLOCOG
Coastal Commission Letter Dated November 19, 2010
Engineer's Preliminary Cost Estimate
Initial Study & Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (provided under separate cover)
Conceptual Site Plan (provided under separate cover)
,
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 12-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT #312 - TRAIN STATION EXPANSION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach pursuant to the statutes and guidelines of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prepared and circulated for public review and
comment an Initial Study and draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Capital Improvement
Project #312 to expand the existing train station located at the southeast corner of Highway 1
and West Grand Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project would expand the train station to the south
incorporating a bus passenger loading/unloading area, a bus shelter, and approximately 40
additional parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the Grover Beach City Council held a public hearing on February 21,2012,
to consider public testimony, and review and consider the project and the Mitigated Negative
Declaration; and
WHEREAS, there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and
Game Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this
project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment as a result of implementing the mitigation measures contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, which have been added to the project conditions;,and.
WHEREAS, all mitigation measures will be monitored in accordance with the Mitigation
Monitoring Program, attached as Exhibit "B" to this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Grover
Beach DOES HEREBY ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration relating to Capital
Improvement Project #312 and the associated mitigation measures contaihed in Exhibit A and
the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit B.
On motion by _ _ _ _ _ _ , seconded by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , and on the
following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Council
Council
Council
Council
Members Members Members Members-
Page 2
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
the foregoing Resolution was PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 21st day of
February 2012.
,~~
JOHN
Attest:
DONNA L. McMAHON, CITY CLERK
P.~MAYOR
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Page 3
Exhibit A
Mitigation Measures
AQ-1 Fugitive Dust Control Measures.
a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible;
b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust
from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind
speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever
possible;
c. All dirt stock pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed;
d. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and
landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any
soil disturbing activities;
e. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month
after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and
watered until vegetation is established;
f. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved
chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCO;
g. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as
possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used;
h. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved
surface at the construction site;
i. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should
maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load
and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
j. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash
off trucks and equipment leaving the site;
k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent
paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible;
I. All of these fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on grading and building
plans; and
m. The contractor or builder shall deSignate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust
emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize
dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20 percent opacity, and to prevent
transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when
work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be
provided to the APCO Compliance O'ivision prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or
demolition.
AQ-2 Construction Equipment.
a. Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's
specifications;
b. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with ARB certified motor vehicle
diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for sue off-road);
c. Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner offroad heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State Off-Road Regulation;
d. Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the ARB's 2007 or cleaner certification
standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road
Regulation;
e. Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have engines in their fleet that
meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Page 4
exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall
be posted in the deSignated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and
operators of the 5 minute idling limit;
g. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted;
h. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors;
i. Electrify eqUipment when feasible;
j. Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and
k. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feaSible, such as
compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane or biodiesel.
f.
AQ-3 Idling Restrictions for On-road Vehicles.
On-road diesel vehicles shall comply with Section 2485 of Title 13, the California Code of
regulations which limits diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles that operate in the State of
California with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds and licensed for
operation on highways. It applies to California and non-California based vehicles. In general, the
regulation specifies that drivers of said vehicles shall not operate a diesel-fueled auxiliary power
systems (APS) to power a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary equipment on that vehicle
during sleeping or resting in a sleeper berth for greater than five minutes at any location when
within 100 feet of a restricted area, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation.
AQ-4 Idling Restrictions for Off-road Vehicles.
Off-road diesel equipment shall comply with the five minute idling restriction identified in Section
2449(d)(3) of the California Air Resources Board's In-Use Off-Road Diesel regulation. Signs
shall be posted in the deSignated queuing areas and job sites to remind off-road equipment
operators of the five minute idling limit.
B10-1 Nesting Birds.
In order to avoid impacts to nesting birds, including birds protected under the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, all initial ground disturbing activities should be limited to the time period between
February 1 and September 1 (i.e., outside the nesting season). If initial site disturbance,
grading, and tree removal cannot be conducted during this time period, a preconstruction survey
for active nests within the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at the site no
more than two weeks prior to any construction activities. If active nests are identified, then all
construction work shall be conducted a minimum of 250 feet from the nests, until the adults and
young are no longer reliant on the nest site, as determined by a City approved biologist in
coordination with the CDFG. The City approved biologist shall determine the final buffer
distance, to be dependent on the species potentially affected.
B10-2 Wetland Mitigation.
The applicant shall coordinate with the CDFG, USACE, and RWQCB to determine if permits are
required from any of these agencies. The applicant shall submit proof of coordination with these
agencies or copies of permits to the Community Development and Public Works Departments
prior to the issuance of grading permits. Loss of 1.26 acres of willow woodland, and 0.06 acre of
three parameter wetland within the willow woodland shall be mitigated at a ratio to be
determined by the permitting agencies, but shall not be less than 2: 1 (two acres of off-site
habitat created to one acre of habitat lost) or 1:1 on-site to ensure the no net loss of functions
and values of the wetland habitat on-site. Local native riparian and wetland species shall be
used. A mitigation plan shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and shall at a minimum include
the following components:
a) Mitigation plantings for the loss of existing willow woodland shall provide a minimum 2: 1 ratio
of habitat values and functions to that impacted. However, agency permitting may require a
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Page 5
higher ratio.
b) Mitigation plantings for the loss of existing federal wetland shall provide a minimum 1:1 ratio
of habitat values and functions to that impacted. However, agency permitting may require a
higher ratio.
c) A mitigation phasing section to ensure that all restoration plantings are in place with sufficient
irrigation prior to final inspection.
d) Restoration/revegetation activities shall use native wetland species from locally collected
stock.
e) Prior to commencement of grading, the applicant shall file weed control/management
provisions, irrigation methods and schedule.
f) Annual reporting requirements.
Since mitigation on-site is not feasible for willow woodland, mitigation off-site at a location
approved by the permitting agencies shall occur. Alternatively, payment into an in-lieu fee
program and/or purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank may be allowed by the
permitting agencies for impacts to wetlands.
CR-1 Stop Work at Encounter.
The City and/or their agents, representatives or contractors shall stop work immediately in the
event that archaeological remains are encountered during grading, construction, landscaping or
other construction-related activity. If previously undiscovered archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist and Native
American representative to evaluate the significance of the find and prescribe appropriate
mitigation (e.g., curation, preservation in place, etc.), if necessary. After the find has been
appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. This condition shall be printed on all
building and grading plans.
GEO-1 Geotechnical Study. As required by the City, a geotechnical study shall be prepared for
the site and submitted to the City. The geotechnical study shall include a liquefaction and
settlement analysis. At a minimum, the study shall be in accordance with City and State building
codes, and the California Division of Mines and Geology Guidelines for Evaluating and
Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California (revised 2008). Such studies would typically include
site specific depth to groundwater and soil composition as they relate to seismically induced
hazards. Any recommended measures to minimize potential risks due to liquefaction or
settlement specified in the geotechnical study shall be fully implemented in accordance with
Uniform Building Code (UBC) and California Building Code (CBC) requirements. Any
recommended measures and project compliance with UBC and CBC requirements shall
incorporated into the project design and engineering and verified at the permit stage.
Page 6
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Mitigation
Number
Implementation
Timing
MItigation Measure
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
AIR QUALITY
AQ-1
During
Construction
Fugitive Dust Control Measures
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Reduce the amount of the
disturbed area where possible;
Use of water trucks or sprinkler
systems in sufficient quantities to
prevent airborne dust from leaving
the site.
Increased watering
frequency would be required
whenever wind speeds exceed 15
mph.
Reclaimed (non-potable)
water should be used whenever
possible;
All dirt stock pile areas should be
sprayed daily as needed;
Permanent dust control measures
identified in the approved project
revegetation and landscape plans
should be implemented as soon as
possible following completion of
any soil disturbing activities;
Exposed ground areas that are
planned to be reworked at dates
greater than one month after initial
grading should be sown with a fast
germinating,
f)
g)
h)
i)
non-invasive
grass
seed and watered until vegetation
is established;
All disturbed soil areas not subject
to revegetation should be stabilized
using approved chemical soil
binders, jute netting, or other
methods approved in advance by
the APCD;
All roadways, driveways, sidewalks,
etc. to be paved shou Id be
completed as soon as possible
after grading unless seeding or soil
binders are used;
Vehicle speed for all construction
vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph
on any unpaved surface at the
construction site;
All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or
other loose materials are to be
covered or should maintain at least
two feet of freeboard (minimum
vertical distance between top of
load and top of trailer) in
accordance with CVC Section
23114;
Inspect site
periodically during
construction to
ensure mitigation
measure is
implemented
City
I
Page 7
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Mitigation
Number
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
j)
Install wheel washers where
vehicles enter and exit unpaved
roads onto streets, or wash off
trucks and equipment leaving the
site;
k) Sweep streets at the end of each
day if visible soil material is carried
onto adjacent paved roads. Water
sweepers with reclaimed water
should be used where feasible;
I) All of these fugitive dust mitigation
measures shall be shown on
grading and building plans; and
m) The contractor or builder shall
designate a person or persons to
monitor the fugitive dust emissions
and enhance the implementation of
the measures as necessary to
minimize dust complaints, reduce
visible emissions below 20 percent
opacity, and to prevent transport of
dust offsite.
Their duties shall
include holidays and weekend
periods when work may not be in
progress. The name and telephone
number of such persons shall be
provided to the APCD Compliance
Division prior to the start of any
grading, earthwork or demolition.
AQ-2
Construction Equipment
•
Maintain all construction equipment
in proper tune according to
manufacturer's specifications;
•
Fuel all off-road and portable diesel
powered equipment with ARB
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel
(non-taxed version suitable for sue
off-road);
•
Use diesel construction equipment
meeting ARB's Tier 2 certified
engines or cleaner off-road heavyduty diesel engines, and comply
with the State Off-Road Regulation;
Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that
•
meet the ARB's 2007 or cleaner
certification standard for on-road
heavy-duty diesel engines, and
comply with the State On-Road
Regulation;
•
Construction or trucking companies
with fleets that do not have engines
in their fleet that meet the engine
standards identified in the above
two measures (e.g. captive or NO,
exempt area fleets) may be eligible
During
construction
Inspect site
periodically during
construction to
ensure mitigation
measure is
implemented
City
Page 8
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312- Train Station Expansion
MItigation
Number
Mitigation Measure
•
•
•
•
•
•
,
AQ-4
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
by proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment
shall not idle for more than 5
minutes. Signs shall be posted in
the designated queuing areas and
or job sites to remind drivers and
operators of the 5 minute idling limit;
Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of
sensitive receptors is not permitted;
Staging and queuing areas shall not
be located within 1,000 feet of
sensitive receptors;
Electrify equipment when feasible;
Substitute gasoline-powered in
place of diesel-powered equipment,
where feasible; and
Use alternatively fueled construction
equipment on-site where feasible,
such as compressed natural gas
(CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG),
propane or biodiese!.
Idling Restrictions for On-road
Vehicles
AQ-3
Implementation
Timing
During
construction
Inspect site
periodically during
construction to
ensure mitigation
measure is
implemented
City
During
construction
Inspect site
periodically during
construction to
ensure mitigation
measure is
implemented
City
On-road diesel vehicles shall comply
with Section 2485 otTilie 13, the
California Code of Regulations which
limits diesel-fueled commercial motor
vehicles that operate in the State of
California with gross vehicular weight
ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds
and licensed for operation on highways.
It applies to California and non-California
based vehicles. In general, the
regulation specifies that drivers of said
vehicles shall not operate a diesel-fueled
auxiliary power systems (APS) to power
a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary
equipment on that vehicle during
sleeping or resting in a sleeper berth for
greater than five minutes at any location
when within 100 feet of a restricted area,
except as noted in Subsection (d) of the
regulation.
Idling Restrictions for Off-road
Vehicles
Off-road diesel equipment shall comply
with the five minute idling restriction
identified in Section 2449(d)(3) of the
California Air Resources Board's In-Use
Off-Road Diesel regulation. Signs shall
be posted in the designated queuing
areaS and job sites to remind off-road
equipment operators of the five minute
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Mitigation
Number
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Page 9
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
idling limit.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
B10-1
Nesting Birds
In order to avoid impacts to nesting
birds, including birds protected under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, all initial
ground disturbing activities should be
limited to the time period between
February 1 and September 1 (i.e.,
outside the nesting season). If initial site
disturbance, grading, and tree removal
cannot be conducted during this time
period, a pre-construction survey for
active nests within the project site shall
be conducted by a qualified biologist at
the site no more than two weeks prior to
any construction activities. If active
nests are identified, then all construction
work shall be conducted a minimum of
250 feet from the nests, until the adults
and young are no longer reliant on the
nest site, as determined by a Cityapproved biologist in coordination with
the CDFG. The City-approved biologist
shall determine the final buffer distance,
to be dependent on the species
potentially affected.
B10-2
Weiland Mitigation
The applicant shall coordinate with the
CDFG, USACE, and RWQCB to
determine if permits are required from
any of these agencies. The applicant
shall submit proof of coordination with
these agencies or copies of permits to
the Community Development and Public
Works Departments prior to the issuance
of grading permits. Loss of 1.26 acres of
willow woodland, and 0.06 acre of three
parameter wetland within the willow
woodland shall be mitigated at a ratio to
be determined by the permitting
agencies, but shall not be less than 2: 1
(two acres of off-site habitat created to
one acre of habitat lost) or 1:1 on-site to
ensure the no net loss of functions and
values of the wetland habitat on-site.
Local native riparian and wetland
species shall be used.
A mitigation plan shall be prepared by a
qualified biologist and shall at a
minimum include the following
Prior to
issuance of
building permits
Review survey and
monitoring reports
City
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Review permits,
inspect site to verify
completion of permit
requirements
City
During and
following
construction
Inspect site and
oversee
implementation and
completion of
mitigation program
Page 10
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Mitigation
Number
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
components:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Mitigation plantings for the loss of
existing willow woodland shall
provide a minimum 2:1 ratio (two
acres of off-site habitat created to
one acre of habitat lost) or 1: 1 onsite to ensure the no net loss of
functions and values ratio of habitat
values and functions to that
impacted. However, agency
permitting may require a higher
ratio.
Mitigation plantings for the loss of
existing federal wetland on-site shall
provide a minimum 1:1 ratio of
habitat values and functions to that
impacted. However, agency
permitting may require a higher
ratio.
A mitigation phasing section to
ensure that all restoration plantings
are in place with sufficient irrigation
priorto final inspection.
Restoration/revegetation activities
shall use native wetland species
from locally collected stock.
Prior to commencement of grading,
the applicant shall file weed
control/management prOVisions,
irrigation methods and schedule.
Annual reporting requirements.
Since mitigation on-site is not feasible for
willow woodland, mitigation off-site at a
location approved by the permitting
agenCies shall occur. Alternatively,
payment into an in-lieu fee program
and/or purchase of credits at an
approved mitigation bank may be
allowed by the permitting agencies for
impacts to wetlands.
CUL rURAL RESOURCES
CR-1
Stop Work at Encounter
The City and/or their agents,
representatives or contractors shall stop
work immediately in the event that
archaeological remains are encountered
during grading, construction,
landscaping or other construction-related
activity. If previously undiscovered
archaeological rnaterials are
encountered during construction, the
During
construction
Monitor construction
activities to ensure all
required mitigation
measures are
implemented.
City
Resolution 12-_
Capital Improvement Project #312 - Train Station Expansion
Mitigation
Number
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Page 11
Administrative
Action
Agency
Responsible
for Verification
City shall relain a qualified archaeologist
and Native American representative to
evaluate the significance of the find and
prescribe appropriate mitigation (e.g.,
curation, preservation in place, etc.), if
necessary. After the find has been
appropriately mitigated, work in the area
may resume. This condition shall be
printed on all building and grading plans.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1
Geotechnical Study
As required by the City, a geotechnical
study shall be prepared for the site and
submitted to the City. The geotechnical
study shall include a liquefaction and
settlement analysis. At a minimum, the
study shall be in accordance with City
and State building codes, and the
California Division of Mines and Geology
Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating
Seismic Hazards in California (revised
2008). Such studies would typically
include site-specific depth to
groundwater and soil composition as
they relate to seismically induced
hazards. Any recommended measures
to minimize potential risks due to
liquefaction or settlement specified in the
geotechnical study shall be fully
implemented in accordance with Uniform
Building Code (UBC) and California
Building Code (CBC) requirements. Any
recommended measures and project
compliance with UBC and CBC
requirements shall incorporated into the
project design and engineering and
verified at the permit stage.
Prior to
issuance of
grading permits
Review geotechnical
study for compliance
During
Monitor construction
activities to ensure all
required mitigation
measures are
implemented
construction
City
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 12-_
A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH
APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT #312 - TRAIN STATION EXPANSION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grover Beach has received for its review and
consideration a Staff Report and presentation for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) #312 to
expand the existing train station located at the southeast corner of Highway 1 and West Grand
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project would expand the train station to the south
incorporating a bus passenger loading/unloading area, a bus shelter, and approximately 40
additional parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located in the Coastal Zone and is a "public works" project
as defined by the Coastal Act; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach prepared an Initial Study and the City Council
adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project at the February 21, 2012
meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grover Beach held a public hearing on
February 21,2012 to review and consider the Coastal Development Permit and the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the notice of Public Hearing was sent to adjoining property owners and
advertised in the manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Grover Beach makes the following findings:
1.
The project is an appealable Development and a public hearing has been conducted in
accordance with the Grover Beach Municipal Code (GBMC) Section 9145.7.
2.
The project was noticed 10 days prior to the public hearing in The Tribune, notice was
given by first-class mail to property owners within three hundred feet and residents
within one hundred feet, the notice was transmitted to the district office of the California
Coastal Commission, and the notice was posted in three places in the City as prescribed
by Section 9145.6.
3.
The project is consistent with Land Use Policy 6.3 to develop a multi-modal transit center
by integrating train and bus service with seamless connections for visitors and
commuters. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle connections to the train
station and to the adjacent RV Park.
4.
The proposed use is consistent with the purpose of the Coastal Planned Commercial
zone by providing a visitor serving need. The project meets all the development
standards of the Coastal Planned Commercial zone including lot coverage, landscaping,
and setbacks.
5.
The project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program Policy 2.2.4.G.2. because the
project would not obstruct views of the dunes from adjacent inland areas.
Resolution No. 12-_
Coastal Development Permit - Capital Improvement Project #312
6.
Page 2
The project will have no affect on public access to coastal resources and is consistent
with the Public Access and recreation Policies of Chapter 3 of the State Coastal Act The
project also enhances public access to the beach via public transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve a Coastal
Development Permit for Capital Improvement Project #312, subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
GENERAL
G-1.
The use shall comply with all Federal, State, and local codes and regulations.
G-2.
The project shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance at all times.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CDD-1.
The project shall be constructed in substantial compliance with the conceptual plans
dated December 28, 2011 on file in the Community Development Department
CDD-2.
The Mitigation Measures contained in Exhibit A and the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program in Exhibit B of Resolution 12-_ adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration are incorporated herein as part of this resolution.
CDD-3.
The final landscape plan shall be in compliance with the State's Model Water
Ordinance.
CDD-4
All lighting shall be shielded and down lit to prevent glare onto adjacent properties.
CDD-5.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall be valid for 24 months from the date of
final City action, Unless appealed to the California Coastal Commission. A maximum
of three one-year time extensions may be approved by the Community Development
Director.
On motion by -c----,.,------' seconded by_ _ _ _ _ _ _ , and on the
following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Council
Council
Council
Council
Members
Members
Members
Members
-
the foregoing Resolution was PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 21 st day of
February,2012.
!\
JOHN P.
Attest:
DONNA L McMAHON, CITY CLERK
SHO~AYOR
1f;)~
ATTACHMENT 3
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE
GROVER BEACH TRAIN STATION EXPANSION
CJC.:tober
,;,
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into this 1bn day of "YJgHsi, 2008,
among the following agencies: City of Grover Beach and City of Grover Beach Improvement
Agency, jointly ("City"), County of San Luis Obispo, ("County") and San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments, ("SLOCOG"), collectively also referred to as "Parties", to document an
agreement to work together for mutual benefit, in connection with the potential expansion of the
Amtraktr~in station in Grover Beach ("Amtrak Station").
~
:.:
"
.
WHEREAS, 'the Parties recognize the need for redesign and expansion of the Amtrak Station in
order to provide a better and safer facility for both the train and bus passengers, and to locate the
bus transfer station on the same side of the tracks as the Amtrak Station; and
WHEREAS, the County owns vacant land, as well as operates an RV facility known as Coastal
Dunes RV Park, located immediately south of the Amtrak Station; and
WHEREAS, City and SLOCOG have secured funds to be used for an environmental assessment
related to potential expansion ofthe Amtrak Station to the south and onto the vacant land owned
by the County; and
WHEREAS, the County has agreed to consider a long-term lease of that vacant land for the
purpose of the potential expansion; and
WHEREAS, the County would like to improve the access to the Coastal Dunes RV Park, in the
event offuture expansion of the Amtrak Station.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises set forth in this MOU, Parties agree as
follows:
I. City and SLOCOG have secured $25,000 and $30,000 respectively which has been
committed for preparation of the environmental documentation necessary to consider
expansion ofthe Amtrak Station to the south.
2. County will allow access for consultants and other necessary personnel to the parcel
south of the Amtrak Station, in order to conduct the necessary studies for the
environmental evaluation process.
3. County will consider a long-term lease of the vacant parcel south of the Amtrak Station
for the purpose of expansion of that station.
4. Access to the County's Coastal Dunes RV Park will be improved as part of the expansion
project.
,
Memorandum 0/ Understanding/or
Expansion 0/ the Grover Beach Train Station
Page 2
5. Parties will work together in cooperation with Caltrans and other federal and state
agencies towards realization ofthe mutual goals of expansion of the Amtrak Station,
improved access to Coastal Dunes RV Park and generally improved access to and
mobility within this coastal area.
CITY OF GROVER BEACH:
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO:
Julie L. Rodewald, County Clerk-Recorder
and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
BY'~'5
Approved as.t~ Form:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS:
Ronald L. De Carli, Executive Director
Approved as to Form:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
CENTRAL COAST DISTRICT OFFICE
725- FRONT STREET, SUITE 300
SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060
PHON~: (831) 427·4863
FAX: (831) 427·4877
Attachment 4
November 19, 2010
Bruce Buckingham
City of Grover Beach
154 South Eighth Street
Grover Beach, CA 93433
Subject: Proposed Grover Beach Train Station Expansion
Dear Mr. Buckingham:
We are writing in response to your request for written comments on the proposed Grover Beach
train station expansion project. As you described in your e-mail of September 30 th (and as shown
in the preliminary schematic master plan for the project, dated September 8, 2009), the proposed
project consists. of two phases: first; the construction of the bus loading area, parking area and
new access points; and second, the expansion of the RV campground and use of the shared
driveway as the new entry. The proposed project would expand the existing multi-modal transit
station and would provide additional low-cost overnight accommodations.
We generally suPPOtt the expansion of this important public access amenity, as well as the
addition of new low-cost overnight accommodations in the City, which are protected by the
Coastal Act and the City's LCP. At the same time, though, it is our understanding that the site
contains willows and related wet areas, and provides some habitat for certain nesting birds and
potential important species, including the Allen's hummingbird. Although the LCP does not
include any specific requirements related to such resources, we recommend that the project
footprint be minimized as much as possible and that the project be sited and designed to maintain
and enhance these on-site resources, including through theit incorporation into the site design, as
much as possible.
Thank you for the opp~rtunity to comment on this proposaL If you have any questions or would
like. to discuss the project or siting and design changes, please contact me at the address and
phone number above.
Sincerely,
{JlwQ&~c3---Madeline Cavalieri
Coastal Plmmer, Central CoastDistrict Office
Comments on Proposed Grover Beach Train Station Expansion 11.19.1 O.doc
Attachment 5
RICK
'"711 Tank Farm Road, Suite 110
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
805-544-0707 Phone
ENGINEERING COMPANY 805-544-2052 Fax
Project:
Job No:
Date:
Train Station Expansion Project
By:
KD
16161
2/3/2011
TRAIN STATION EXPANSION PROJECT (CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE)
Opin.ion of Probable Cost for the City of Grover Beach
1/4
2/3/2011
214
21312011
··'nY
LS
I Grub
, existing
CY
CY
Backfill
Export (see not. 7)
Fine Grading
AC Paving
AC Paving (3" AC on 12" Class II Base)
16" Curb and Gutter
Curb
IAOARamp
7,500
1,500
LS
1
SF
25,000
SF
LF
EA
EA
SF
SF
32,000
1,250
750
5
2
4,650
1,000
EA
LF
EA
SF
200
4
300
LS
LS
1
1
. LS
1
LS
LS
1
EA
SF
SF
22,000
12000
LF
IB"
I
1
1,000
I wall
I
,bus loading area (12" thick,
IStorm Drain Pipe and
IStorm Drain Inlet
118" HOPE PIoe
1 Rip Rap
I I ,Wall (100'@ 3' tall)
, Plan
, Plan
BMP's
, (for future
1(5 yoars)
,and
PalmTrees
ISlte'
IBus Shelter
$18,000.00
$2.80
$17.00
$9.20
$500.00
$1.25
$12.00
$22.00
$16.00
$127,500.00
$500.00
$31,250.00
$27,500.00
$'
$5.00
$59.00
6
$60,00
$4,000.00
$38.00
$1:
$11
$11,400.00
1
3
EA
LS
$1,500.00
;5.00
;0.21
$111,
$11,
1
I SITE· SU
$1,
SUBl UTAL(i\LL~~E~.S)
20% CONTINGENCY:
15~_~,NGINEERING, STAKING, TESTING:
1070 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT:
IUTAL:
Notes/Assumptions:
1. This cost estimate is preliminary only. Rick Engineering Company makes no warranty, either expressed or implied,
that actual costs will not vary from the amounts indicated and assumes no liability for such variances.
2. Unit Costs are based largely on the 2009 Approved San Luis Obispo County Bonding Estimate values and unit costs and therefore,
may not reflect actual market unit costs.
3. Earthwork quantities are preliminary and are based on aerial topography received from the City of Grover Beach in July 2009
and supplemental survey by Rick Engineering Company on July 13, 2009. Soils information has not been incorporated into these
quantities, they are considered 'raw' quantities. Quantity includes a 1.5' undercut for paved areas.
4. This estimate is for the train station expansion only and does not include any future improvements (County RV Park, etc.)
5. Estimate does not include material disposal co~ts.
3/4
2/3/2011
(
6. Estimate does not assume Prevailing Wage.
7. It is unknown how any export material will be disposed of, so a minimum cost is included. Acutal costs to export material may vary.
8. Mitigation and Monitoring Estimates are based on assumed 4 Acres offsile mitigation in an easement and do not reflect property
purchase of any kind.
4/4
21312011