RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY Tropical Ecology 50(1): 89-102, 2009 © International Society for Tropical Ecology www.tropecol.com 89 ISSN 0564-3295 Tree species diversity and population structure across major forest formations and disturbance categories in Little Andaman Island, India L. RASINGAM & N. PARATHASARATHY* Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry 605 014, India Abstract: The Andaman and Nicobar islands, located in the Indian ocean, are among the biodiversity rich localities in India. Several islands in the southern part were severely affected by a recent cyclone ‘tsunami’. We compared patterns of tree species diversity and extent of damage by tsunami at eight sites in Little Andaman island within eight one ha plots. The study sites were located at relatively undisturbed and disturbed Evergreen (UE, DE), Semievergreen (US, DS), Deciduous (UD, DD) and Littoral (UL, DL) forests. A total of 4252 trees ≥30 cm girth at breast height, covering 186 species in 125 genera and 56 families were recorded within these sites. Of these, 23 species (12.4%) were endemic to these islands. Tree species richness was lowest (18 species ha-1) in the tsunami affected littoral forest and highest (84 species ha-1) in the UE. Tree density (79 to 935 trees ha-1) and basal area (41 to 59.10 m2 ha-1) were greater in all the undisturbed forests as compared to disturbed forests. In all the eight sites, tree species richness and density decreased with increasing girth class and the stand structure of the forests displayed a reverse J-shaped curve, with the exception of the DL. Importance Value Index of three endemic species viz., Manilkara littoralis, Canarium euphyllum and Terminalia bialata has been compared across the forest types and tsunami hit areas. Management implications are discussed. Resumen: Las islas Andamán y Nicobar, localizadas en el Océano Índico, figuran entre las localidades ricas en biodiversidad de la India. Varias islas de su parte sur fueron afectadas severamente por un reciente tsunami. Comparamos patrones de diversidad de especies arbóreas y la magnitud del tsunami en ocho sitios en la isla Pequeña Andamán, en ocho parcelas de 1 ha. Los sitios de estudio se localizaron en bosques perennifolios (UE, DE), subperennifolios (US, DS), caducifolios (UD, DD) y de litoral, tanto relativamente no perturbados como perturbados. En estos sitios se registró un total de 4252 árboles ≥ 30 cm de perímetro a la altura del pecho, los cuales incluyeron 186 especies distribuidas en 125 géneros y 56 familias. De éstas, 23 especies (12.4%) resultaron ser endémicas de las isla. La riqueza de especies arbóreas tuvo su mínimo (18 especies ha-1) en el bosque de litoral afectado por el tsunami y su máximo (84 especies ha-1) en el UE. La densidad arbórea (79 a 935 árboles ha-1) y el área basal (41 a 59.10 m2 ha-1) tuvieron valores mayores en los sitios no perturbados que en los bosques perturbados. En los ocho sitios, la riqueza y la densidad de especies arbóreas y su densidad decrecieron hacia las clases perimétricas mayores, y las estructuras de rodal de los bosques mostraron una curva en forma de J invertida, con excepción del de DL. Los Índices de Valor de Importancia de tres especies endémicas, Manilkara littoralis, Canarium euphyllum y Terminalia bialata, fueron comparados entre tipos de bosque y áreas afectadas por el tsunami. Se discuten las implicaciones para el manejo. Resumo: As ilhas de Andaman e Nicobar, localizadas no oceano Índico, estão entre as * Corresponding Author; e-mail: [email protected] 90 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND localidades com maior riqueza em biodiversidade na Índia. Várias ilhas na parte sul foram severamente afectadas por um ciclone “tsunami” recente. Comparam-se os padrões de diversidade arbórea e a extensão dos estragos pelo tsunami em oito parcelas de um hectare localizadas na pequena ilha de Andaman. As estações de estudo foram localizadas em locais perturbados e não perturbados na floresta sempreverde (EU e DE), na floresta semisempreverde (US e DS), na floresta decídua (UD, DD) e Litoral (UL, DL). Um total de 4252 árvores com perímetro à altura do peito ≥ 30 cm, cobrindo 186 espécies em 125 géneros e 56 famílias foram registadas nestas estações. Destas, 23 espécies (12,4%) eram endémicas nestas ilhas. A riqueza nas espécies arbóreas era mais baixa (18 espécies ha-1) nas florestas litorâneas afectada pelo tsunami e mais alta (84 espécies ha-1) na EU. A densidade arbórea (79 a 935 arvores ha-1) e uma área basal (41 a 59,10 m2 ha-1) foi maior em todas as florestas não disturbadas quando em comparação com as disturbadas. Em todas a oito estações, a riqueza arbórea e a densidade decresceu com o aumento da classe de perímetro e a estrutura da parcela das florestas apresentavam uma curva do tipo J invertido, com excepção da DL. O índice do Valor de Importância de três espécies endémicas viz. Manilkara littoralis, Canarium euphyllum e Terminalia bialata foi comparado ao longo dos tipos florestais e nas áreas atingidas pelo tsunami. As implicações para a gestão são discutidas. Key words: Conservation, human disturbance, Little Andaman, stand structure, selective logging, tree diversity. Introduction Insular biology has always drawn the attention of a number of ecologists (e.g., Balakrishnan & Rao 1983; Renvoize 1979). It has contributed much to our knowledge of speciation, adaptability, invasion, colonization and evolution. Islands tend to have higher percentage of endangered species than other areas due to small geographical area available for each species. Presently, a vast majority of the island biota are severely threatened due to incessant anthropogenic pressures (Bramwell 1979). Rapid loss of tropical forests is recognized as one of the serious environmental and economic problems all over the world (Hare et al. 1997). A number of conservation biologists have raised concern over loss of biodiversity in tropical forests owing to the deforestation and imprudent infra-structure development in the name of modernization. It is doubtful whether modern man will arrive even at the stage of alpha taxonomy of some of the insular floras before they vanish in catastrophic events. This situation may hold true for islands such as Andaman and Nicobar (A&N), where nearly 17% of the plants are endemic (Reddy et al. 2004). Information on the distribution and abundance of insular flora is, therefore, very vital to understand the patterns of speciation, extent of plant diversity across the small islands and to draw long term plans for their conservation and management. The flora of A&N islands is insufficiently known as compared to other parts of India and nearly 20% of the area remains unexplored. Earlier studies have mainly focused on the qualitative assessment of the forest wealth and only few efforts have been made to quantify the vegetation structure and composition (Padalia et al. 2004; Tripathi et al. 2004). This study was undertaken, to determine tree species diversity and stand structure in relatively undisturbed and disturbed evergreen, semi-evergreen, deciduous and littoral forests in Little Andaman. Major findings of the study with reference to floristic composition, species diversity and population structure of tree layer across disturbed and undisturbed categories of these forests are discussed. Material and methods Study area The study was carried out in Little Andaman, which forms a part of A&N group of islands, India RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY 91 Fig. 1. Map showing the location of Little Andaman Island, east of Indian mainland and eight study sites in the island. The complete names of study sites are mentioned in the text. (10° 30’ - 10° 54' N latitudes and 92° 20’ - 92° 35' E longitudes; Fig. 1). It is the third largest island in A&N and covers an area of 733 km2. The terrain is more or less flat with undulations in the northern parts. The central and western portions are hilly and the highest elevation is about 210 m asl. Perennial streams are numerous which run both in the east-west and west-east directions. Geologically, the island comprises thick sedimentary deposits of Eocene period deposited on pre-Tertiary fine grey sandstone, shales and silt stones. Coral reef formations are found in the south-western portion. The soils are loose in texture and low in water holding capacity. The climate is warm and the temperature ranges from 22° - 32°C. The island receives rains from southwest and northeast monsoon (April-December). The mean annual rainfall ranges from 3000-3500 mm and humidity is 85-90% throughout the year. The major vegetation types in the island are Andaman Tropical Evergreen, Andaman Semievergreen, Andaman Moist Deciduous and Littoral forests (Champion & Seth 1968). The littoral forests extend up to 150-200 m from the seashore and are mostly dominated by endemic tree Manilkara littoralis, in association with Terminalia catappa, Gyrocarpus americanus, Guettarda speciosa and Pongamia pinnata. The deciduous forests are located beyond littoral forests and extend up to 400-600 m inland, characterized by Terminalia bialata, T. procera, T. citrina, Tetrameles nudiflora and Pterocymbium tinctorium. The semi-evergreen forests, distributed in the south-eastern part of the island harbour dominant trees such as Oroxylum indicum, Canarium euphyllum, Neonauclea gageana and Tetrameles nudiflora. The evergreen forests are distributed from shore up to 210 m in the interior side of the island and are mostly dominated by Pometia pinnata, Dipterocarpus spp. and Euodia glabra. All forest types were subjected to some level of selective felling from 1983-2001. Timber extraction was banned by the order of Supreme Court of India in 2002. Field methods Eight 1 ha plots were established, one each in undisturbed (site code prefixed with ‘U’) and 92 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND disturbed (site code prefixed with ‘D’) evergreen (UE, DE), semi-evergreen (US, DS), deciduous (UD, DD) and littoral (UL, DL) forests. Plots DE and UE are located ~ 8 km northwest from Hut Bay, the capital town of Little Andaman island. The inter-distance between these plots was ~ 1 km. Semi-evergreen forest plots (US, DS) are situated in southwestern part of Hut Bay. Plot DS is 2 km away from site US and is located near a metal quarry and subjected to disturbance by the quarry workers and domestic animals. Plot DD is located close to human settlements and disturbed by tourism activity, cattle grazing and illegal timber extraction for household materials. The two littoral forest plots were selected based on the destruction of tsunami and human disturbance. Site DL was totally damaged by tsunami in December 2004, and four months later A&N Forest Plantation and Development Corporation extracted all the dead trees. Plot UL is located 10 km away from DL, where the sea level increased up to 5 m during the tsunami, but did not damage the arborescent flora of the site. The altitude of all the forest plots ranged from sea shore up to 70 m above sea level and all the sites experience various levels of human disturbances. Site disturbance scores were arrived based on the observation through questionnaire survey made during the field work by inquiring from the local people. The qualitative assessment of various types of disturbance was ranked as none (0), very low (1), low (2), medium (3) and high (4) (Table 1). Each of the hectare plot was divided into 10 x 10 m quadrats for systematic enumeration. All trees ≥30 cm girth at breast height (gbh, 1.3 m) were enumerated. For multi-stemmed trees the bole girth was measured separately, basal area calculated and summed following Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg (1974). The voucher specimens were collected for each species to confirm their identity. Identification of specimens was carried out in the herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Port Blair (PBL) and Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Puducherry, using the Forest Flora of Andaman Islands (Parkinson 1923) and the Flora of Andaman & Nicobar Islands (Hajra et al. 1999). The voucher specimens are deposited in the Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University. Data analysis Species diversity indices such as Shannon – Wiener index and Simpson’s index were calculated following Magurran (1988). Relative density, relative dominance, relative frequency and Importance Value Index (IVI), a measure of relative prominence of various species in the forest were calculated following Cottam & Curtis (1956). The species-area curve was plotted by sequential Table 1. Site disturbance scores (rank: 0 – none; 1 – rare; 2 – low; 3 – medium; 4 – high) of undisturbed and disturbed evergreen (UE, DE), semi-evergreen (US, DS), deciduous (UD, DD) and littoral forests (UL, DL) of Little Andaman Island, India. Evergreen forest Disturbance Plantation Tourism activity Illegal timber extraction Removal of dead and fallen wood Past logging Livestock grazing Presence of exotics Foot paths Pipelines Medicinal plant collection Tsunami-affected Quarry Total score Semievergreen forest Deciduous forest Littoral forest UE DE US DS UD DD UL DL 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 3 3 4 3 0 3 0 2 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 3 3 3 4 1 2 0 2 0 2 22 0 1 3 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 16 0 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 0 1 0 0 25 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 14 2 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 3 4 0 33 RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY arrangement of 10 x 100 m sub-plots. The patterns of tree species composition were examined in the eight sites using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS) ordination. The ordination was performed based on the data of species richness and disturbance scores, using PC-ORD package. To examine the species similarity among the ten sites an agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed, using Sorensen’s index (Magurran 1988). Results 93 multi-stemmed individuals was higher in UL forest (31), followed by UD forest (17) and lowest in DL (1). Of the total 186 tree species and 44 species (23%) were represented by just one individual. The species-area curves for all eight sites did not reach an asymptote at the hectare plot scale. The species increment was steep in forests UE (30) and US (22) at 0.1 ha level and low in the DL (4) and DD (9), and 1 to 15 species were regularly added up at every 0.1 ha increment. Thus, 1 ha sample plots were insufficient to capture the species richness of these forests (Fig. 2). Species richness and diversity A total of 186 species of trees ≥ 30 cm gbh belonging to 125 genera and 56 families were recorded in all the plots of undisturbed and disturbed evergreen, semi-evergreen, deciduous and littoral forests (Table 2). Of these, two species could be identified only to genus level and 12 species remained unidentified. The species richness was highest in UE forest (84) followed by US forests (83), DE (73), UD (58), UL (43), DS (43), DD (41) and DL forest (18). Sites UE and US harboured higher diversity of genera and family among all the forests. The species diversity indices varied greatly across eight study sites as influenced by the disturbance level. Highest value of Shannon index (3.6) was obtained for US forest. DL forest yielded low score of Shannon index (1.6) and high Simpson index (0.42). The number of Fig. 2. Species-area curves of tree species in the eight study sites. Table 2. Summary of tree diversity inventory (≥ 30 cm gbh) in eight 1 ha plots, distributed respectively one each in undisturbed and disturbed evergreen (UE, DE), semi-evergreen (US, DS), deciduous (UD, DD) and littoral (UL, DL) forests of Little Andaman Island, India. (Total number of species, genera and families in all the forests are 186, 125 and 56 respectively). Variables Species richness No. of genera No. of families Diversity indices (i) Shannon (ii) Simpson Density (stems ha-1) Basal area (m2 ha-1) No. of multi-stemmed individuals Maximum tree gbh (cm) Average tree gbh (cm) Evergreen forest Semi-evergreen forest Deciduous forest Littoral forest UE DE US DS UD DD UL DL 84 63 35 73 58 33 83 64 36 43 39 28 58 50 29 41 39 25 43 38 26 18 18 15 3.4 0.06 488 47.7 2 412 91.2 3.5 0.05 410 41.0 3 421 91.7 3.6 0.05 935 55.3 17 593 71.5 2.7 0.13 543 44.7 7 325 89.9 3.1 0.07 519 57.5 5 487 92.6 1.7 0.44 623 49.4 9 352 86.5 2.7 0.12 655 59.7 31 541 80.7 1.6 0.42 79 51.1 1 610 250.2 94 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND Table 3. Density of all tree species ≥30 cm gbh encountered in the eight study plots (stems ha-1) of Little Andaman forests (Abbreviations as in Table 1). Species (and family) Density UE DE US DS UD DD UL DL Total 7 14 47 409 11 0 494 31 166 122 35 46 29 35 1 10 2 43 23 97 4 8 5 2 5 6 61 5 10 42 30 38 30 10 14 27 17 46 1 4 15 18 8 30 12 3 27 3 33 12 3 26 5 90 23 27 10 40 2 21 44 12 52 23 5 3 2 5 3 1 7 1 3 2 - 10 17 9 11 7 3 5 6 1 3 3 42 1 1 1 - 8 1 182 1 34 3 2 78 51 2 88 3 1 40 1 9 5 14 1 - 317 222 183 154 138 129 129 121 115 103 89 88 82 74 71 68 66 62 61 58 53 43 43 41 40 36 36 33 33 30 29 1 2 6 87 1 10 22 61 26 2 21 4 3 128 15 29 27 26 26 25 25 24 24 23 22 760 Terminalia bialata Stued. (Combretaceae) 4 2 Tetrameles nudiflora R.Br.ex Benn.(Datiscaceae) Pterocymbium tinctorium (Blanco) Merr. (Sterculiaceae) Gyrocarpus americanus Jacq. (Hernandiaceae) Bombax insigne Wall. (Bombacaceae) Knema andamanica (Warb.) de Willde (Myristicaceae) Manilkara littoralis (Kurz) Dubard (Sapotaceae) Pometia pinnata J.R.Forst & G.Forst (Sapindaceae) Terminalia procera Roxb. (Combretaceae) Canarium euphyllum Kurz (Burseraceae) Dipterocarpus alatus Roxb. (Dipterocarpaceae) Dipterocarpus gracilis Bl. (Dipterocarpaceae) Guettarda speciosa L. (Rubiaceae) Lagerstromia hypoleuca Kurz (Lythraceae) Terminalia citriana King (Combretaceae) Neolamarkia cadamba (Roxb.) Bosser (Rubiaceae) Neonauclea gageana (King) Merr. (Rubiaceae) Celtis philippensis Blanco var. wightii (Planch.) Scop. (Ulmaceae) Drypetes longifolia (Bl.) Pax. & Hoffm. (Euphorbiaceae) Planchonia valida (Bl.) Bl. (Lecythidaceae) Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz (Bignoniaceae) Dipterocarpus grandiflorus (Blanco) Blanco (Dipterocarpaceae) Chukrasia tabularis Andr. (Meliaceae) Dracontomelon dao (Blanco) Merr.& Rolfe (Anacardiaceae) Terminalia catappa L. (Combretaceae) Semecarpus prainii King (Anacardiaceae) Ficus hispida L.f. (Moraceae) Ryparosa javanica (Bl.)Kurz ex Koord.& Val. (Flacourtiaceae) Ficus racemosa Jack (Moraceae) Streblus asper Lour. (Moraceae) Garuga pinnata Roxb. (Burseraceae) Aglaia spectabilis Bl. (Meliaceae) 2 4 44 48 2 58 30 2 5 24 4 2 31 1 2 3 4 11 20 14 2 56 59 4 8 11 1 15 15 7 4 3 11 6 1 13 Morinda citrifolia L. var. bracteata Hook.f. (Rubiaceae) Sterculia rubiginosa Vent. var. glabrescens King (Sterculiaceae) Elaeocarpus rugosus Roxb. (Elaeocarpaceae) Mallotus peltatus (Gies) Muell.-Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) Dysoxylum arborescens (Bl.) Miq. (Meliaceae) Pterospermum acerifolium (L.) Willd. (Sterculiaceae) Aglaia argentea Bl. (Meliaceae) Canarium denticulatum Bl. ssp.denticulatum (Burseraceae) Baccaurea ramiflora Lour. (Euphorbiaceae) Alphonsea ventricosa Hook.f & Thoms. (Annonaceae) Others 1 1 15 11 2 3 21 7 13 2 1 3 16 2 8 1 14 1 3 14 3 4 151 115 167 Total 488 410 935 543 519 623 655 79 4252 2 3 2 36 RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY Richness of major plant families A total of 56 families were recorded within the study plots (total area of 8 hectares). Euphorbiaceae formed the most speciose family with 11 genera and 17 species (9.14%). However, Moraceae (4 genera, 12 species, 6.5%), Rubiaceae (9 genera, 11 species, 5.9%), Meliaceae (6 genera, 11 species, 5.9%), Anacardiaceae (7 genera, 8 species, 4.3%) and Annonaceae (6 genera, 6 species and 3.22%) were the other well represented families. Apocynaceae, Bignoniaceae, Fabaceae, Hernandiaceae, Lechythidaceae, Malvaceae, Pandanaceae, Ulmaceae and Verbenaceae had two species each (9.67%), while 26 families (46.4%) had single species in all the forests. Five families Combretaceae (730 individuals, 17.23%), Datiscaceae (317, 7.48%), Sterculiaceae (291, 6.87%), Dipterocarpaceae (287, 6.77%) and Rubiaceae (283, 6.67 %) were abundant in terms of density, contributing ca. 45 % of the forest stand. Eighteen families were represented by one individual each (Table 3). Tree density, basal area and dominance The stand density was highest (935 ha-1) in US forest and lowest (79 ha-1) in the tsunami affected forest i.e., DL and moderate in other forests. The 95 total basal area of DE forest was low (40.9 m2 ha-1) as compared to UL forest (59.6 m2 ha-1). Manilkara littoralis, the predominant tree in littoral forests UL and DL, contributed 75.9 m2 to basal area. The other dominant trees in the study sites that contributed to greater basal area include Terminalia bialata (39.4 m2), Pterocymbium tinctorium (24.2 m2), Tetrameles nudiflora (22.3 m2) and Pometia pinnata (21.2 m2). The stem density of different tree species varied considerably across sites (Table 4). Terminalia bialata had highest number of stems (494 stems) followed by Tetrameles nudiflora (317 stems). 44 species were represented by just one individual. Two species viz. Pterocymbium tinctorium and Bombax insigne were distributed in all the forests with 222 (5.2%) and 154 (3.6%) stems respectively. Dipterocarpus gracilis (89), Celtis philippensis var. wightii (66), Dracontomelon dao (43) and Diploknema butyracea (17) were encountered at all the sites except littoral forest. The rare tree Alphonsea ventricosa was encountered only in DD with 22 stems (0.5%). The evergreen and semievergreen forests had 51 tree species common between them and 47 species were common between semi-evergreen and moist deciduous forests. Neonauclea gageana was recorded only in semi-evergreen forest. It is a rare endemic species Table 4. Contribution of families to tree genera, species, density (stems ha-1), basal area (BA m2 ha-1) and family importance value (FIV) for the total eight study plots. Family Genera Species Density BA FIV Combretaceae 1 4 730 61.9 34.9 Datiscaceae 1 1 317 22.4 13.6 Sterculiaceae 4 6 291 28.0 17.1 Dipterocarpaceae 2 6 287 27.5 16.9 Rubiaceae 9 11 283 22.2 18.2 Hernandiaceae 2 2 187 9.5 7.9 Sapotaceae 5 6 181 81.8 28.0 Euphorbiaceae 11 17 177 6.2 14.9 Burseraceae 2 3 169 16.8 9.8 Myristicaceae 3 4 163 7.2 7.8 Sapindaceae 4 4 162 23.2 11.8 Meliaceae 6 11 160 6.6 11.3 Bombacaceae 1 1 154 12.9 7.4 Moraceae 4 12 154 13.0 13.3 Anacardiaceae 7 8 111 11.2 9.7 Others 63 78 726 49.75 71.4 96 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND reported only from middle A&N islands so far (Hajra et al. 1999). Its occurrence in the present locality is a range extension. It was found that this species had higher density in disturbed plot DS (38 trees ha-1) and lower in undisturbed plot US (30 trees ha-1). Two species Dendrocnide sinuata (Urticaceae) and Elaeocarpus serratus (Elaeocarpaceae) recorded within UE and DE are mainly known from the forests of Western Ghats and other forest areas of northeast India (Rao 1986). Hence they form new additions to the flora of A&N Islands. As expected, tree density decreased with increasing girth class, exhibiting a reverse J-shaped stand structure, except for the largest size class (> 210 cm) in forests DL and UL (Fig. 3). The smallest girth class of 30-60 cm contributed 44.20% Fig. 3. Size-class distribution of tree density in the undisturbed and disturbed evergreen, semi-evergreen, deciduous and littoral forest plots. Fig. 4. Size-class distribution of basal area in the undisturbed and disturbed evergreen, semi-evergreen, deciduous and littoral forest plots. RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY of the stems and this proportion decreased with increasing size class. Tree density in smaller girth class (30-60 cm) was greater in UL (55.9%) and US (53.26%) forests and lowest in DL (6.32%) forest. Density of trees in higher girth class (>210 cm) was higher in DL (50 trees ha-1), followed by UL (43 trees ha-1) and least in US forest (11 trees ha-1). The basal area distribution is typically J-shaped in the study sites, with the exception of sites US, DS and DD (Fig 4). Density of various size classes is given in Table 5. The species richness in smaller girth class (30-60 cm gbh) was maximum in forest US (59) and lowest in DL forest (4). Manilkara littoralis, a species of littoral forest had highest IVI value (217.5) at disturbed site (DL) while it had rather low IVI (72.2) at UL. Tetrameles nudiflora, an emergent tree, had higher IVI (69.64) at DS than UD (45.8). Terminalia bialata (170.4) at DD forest, Pometia pinnata (50.4) at DE, Dipterocarpus gracilis (40.6) at UE and Canarium euphyllum (39) at US had higher IVI values (Fig. 5). Of all the forests, DD was unique as it was dominated by one species i.e., Terminalia bialata (Combretaceae) which contributed 65.7% of the stems (409), 170.4 to the total IVI and 68.9% (34 m2 ha-1) to basal area. Most of the individuals of this species were invariably represented by large trees. Species richness and intensity of disturbance The non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS) ordination, based on the species richness, and disturbance score is shown in Fig. 6. The analysis revealed that the sites UE and US were distinctly placed on the positive coordinates of the NMS axis, mainly because of high species richness and low level of human disturbance. Sites UL, UD, DD, DS and DE placed in the middle due to the Table 5. Girth class (cm) 30-60 97 moderate species richness and human interference. Site DL placed in the bottom left of the ordination due to the poor species richness and the high disturbances such as human interference and the recent tsunami effects. Discussion Tree species richness at defined study sites and in minimum diameter class gives a reliable instrument to indicate diversity level of a forest site (Wattenberg & Breckle 1995). Plant species diversity is mostly influenced by human impacts and natural disturbances. Clear differences in stand structure and species diversity among undisturbed and disturbed sites of evergreen, semi-evergreen, deciduous and littoral forests were discernible in this study. The stand density of Little Andaman forests (mean 531 trees ha-1, range 79-935) is lower as compared to densities reported from Saddle Peak (459 - 2681 trees ha-1) of North Andaman Islands and Great Andaman groups (946 - 1137 trees ha-1, Padalia et al. 2004). However, the tree density is comparable with other tropical forests e.g., Kalakad, Western Ghats (575 - 855 trees ha-1, Parthasarathy 1999), Costa Rica (448 617 trees ha-1, Heaney & Proctor 1990), Brazil (420 - 777 trees ha-1, Campbell et al. 1992), Sulawesi (408 trees ha-1, Whitmore & Sidiyasa 1986) and Danum Valley, Sabah (431 trees ha-1, Kamarudin 1986). The tree density was low in DL forest (79 trees ha-1), wherein maximum destruction was caused by tsunami. All trees in the lower girth class died due to the high salinity and tidal force. In the deciduous forests, the stand density of UD (519 trees ha-1) was less than that of DD forest (623 trees ha-1), but the basal area was compensated by the mature and large trees. Species richness of trees by girth class in eight study sites of Little Andaman Island. Species richness UE DE US DS UD DD UL DL 57 54 59 34 49 38 48 4 61-90 36 29 33 24 28 21 26 7 91-120 28 22 24 20 21 7 17 8 121-150 24 17 14 18 14 7 9 4 151-180 12 11 8 10 8 6 11 4 181-210 11 11 7 6 13 3 4 0 >210 16 13 7 7 14 8 6 2 98 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND Fig. 5. Important value indices of top five tree species in UE, DE, US, DS, UD, DD, UL and DL forests. (rD-relative density, rF-relative frequency and rBA-relative dominance). Six-letter codes are used for species names, drawing three from generic name and three from species name, for full names of species refer Table 3. RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY The species richness of the present study forests (range 18 to 84 species ha-1) ranks low to moderately high when compared to other forests of Andaman islands (25 - 61 species ha-1 in Saddle peak of North Andaman Islands, Tripathi et al. 2004 and 58 - 59 species ha-1 in Great Andaman groups, Padalia et al. 2004), and those of Western Ghats in south India (80 - 85 species ha-1 in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Parthasarathy 1999; 64 - 82 trees ha-1 in Sengaltheri-Kakachi, Parthasarathy 2001; and 52 - 79 species ha-1 in Varagalaiar, Ayyappan & Parthasarathy 2001). The tree species richness in neotropical forests showed a wide variation, ranging from 20 species ha-1 in Varzea forest of Rio Xingu, Brazil (Campbell et al. 1992) to 307 species ha-1 in the Amazonian Equator (Valencia et al. 1994). In the old world tropics species richness ranged from 26 species ha-1 in Kolli hills of India (Chittibabu & Parthasarathy 2000) to 231 species ha-1 in Brunei Darussalam of Southeast Asia (Poulsen et al. 1996). The basal area of trees in Little Andaman forests (mean 50.8 m2 ha-1, range 41 - 59.1) is much higher than mean pantropical average of 32 m2 ha-1 (Dawkins 1959) and slightly higher than the value reported from Great Andamans (28 - 44 m2 ha-1, Padalia et al. 2004), Malaysia (24.2 m2 ha-1, Poore 1968) and Brazilian Amazon forests (27.6 32 m2 ha-1, Campbell et al. 1986). The values are more or less comparable with those reported from Saddle Peak forests of North Andaman islands (48 - 75 m2 ha-1, Tripathi et al. 2004), Kalakad, Western Ghats (53.3 - 94.6 m2 ha-1, Parthasarathy et al. 1992), New Caledonia (47 - 49.5 m2 ha-1, Jeffre & Veillon 1990) forests and less than that of Monteverde of Costa Rica (62 m2 ha-1, Nadkarni et al. 1995) and Kalakad forests of southern Western Ghats (61.7 - 94.6 m2 ha-1, Parthasarathy 1999). The greatest basal area of 59.1 m2 ha-1 obtained in UL forest was largely due to the contribution from the endemic tree Manilkara littoralis, which alone scored 47.8% (28.2 m2 ha-1) of basal area. Lower value of basal area at DE (41 m2 ha-1), is due to selective logging of timber species during recent past. In the present study, disturbed moist deciduous forests (DD) had the dominance of Terminalia bialata (17.22% of all the trees), followed by Dastiscaceae (7.48% individuals). The former is an endemic species to Andaman & 99 Nicobar Islands and well represented in all girth classes. Ho et al. (1987) found that in moist forests of Jengka, Malaysia, Euphorbiaceae formed bulk of tree population (24.6%). Melastomataceae (22%), Oleaceae (26.6%) and Lauraceae (28%) formed bulk of the tree population in Kolli hills, Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats and Kalakad Forest respectively (Parthasarathy 1999). In African forest, Gilbertiodendron dewevrei (Caesalpiniaceae) achieved dominance by inhibiting the growth of other understory plants by various ways (Torti et al. 2001). Monodominant forests were dominated by different tree species in each and every geographical area. Celaenodendron mexicanum in Mexico (Martijena & Bullock 1994), Nothofagus aequilateralis (Fagaceae) in New Caledonia (Read et al. 1995), Peltogyne gracilipes (Caesalpiniaceae) in Maraca Island, Brazil (Nascimento et al. 1997) and Memecylon umbellatum (Melastomataceae) in Pudukottai, India (Mani & Parthasarathy 2005). At the family level, Leguminosae dominated the neotropics and Africa (Richards 1996), Dipterocarpaceae in Malaysia (Manokaran et al. 1991; Whitmore 1984) and Melastomataceae in Pudukottai, India (Mani & Parthasarathy 2005). The most speciose families were Euphorbiaceae (17 species), Moraceae (12), Fig. 6. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS) ordination of the eight sites based on species richness and disturbance scores in the study forests. 100 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND Rubiaceae (11) and Meliaceae (11) in Little Andaman. Kadavul & Parthasarathy (1999) also reported that the family Euphorbiaceae (8) as the most speciose family followed by Rubiaceae (5) in the semi-evergreen forests of Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats. Moraceae (10), Lauraceae (8) and Rubiaceae (8) in the Kolli hills (Chittibabu & Parthasarathy 2000) and Lauraceae (14), Euphorbiaceae (10) and Myrtaceae (10) in the Kalakad Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats (Parthasarathy 1999). The species rarity of the present study is 34%, which is very close to the forests of Kuzhanthaikuppam of Coromandel Coast (31%, Parthasarathy & Karthikeyan 1997), Malaysia (38%, Poore 1968) and Barro Colorado island of Panama (40%, Thorington et al. 1982); but less than those of other tropical forests, such as Java (50%, Meijer 1959), New Guinea (55.4%, Paijmans 1970) and Jengka forest of Malaysia (59%, Ho et al. 1987). Tree size class distribution can be used as indicators of changes in population structure and species composition (Newbery & Gartlan 1996). Distribution curves that drop exponentially with increasing gbh (reverse J-shaped) are characteristic for species with continuous regeneration (Khamyong et al. 2004). Curves showing little or no drop in the lower gbh classes indicate the requirement is unsustainable and the long term change in species composition of the plant community studied is to be expected (Hall & Bawa 1993). Most species in the study plots followed reverse J-shaped distribution with greater number of individuals in small size classes. Such a trend has been reported from the forests of Great Andaman groups (Padalia et al. 2004), Saddle peak of North Andaman islands (Tripathi et al. 2004), Malaysia (Poore 1968), Thailand (Khamyong et al. 2004), Sungei Menyala in Malaysia (Manokaran & Kochummen 1987) and in Monteverde of Costa Rica (Nadkarni et al. 1995). The lack of J-shaped structure for basal area in the plot DL indicates past disturbance by the tsunami. million years (Halle 1990). The conversion of tropical rain forests into various land use systems created so many impacts on island flora. As the study sites are composed of high percentage of species rarity (34%) and endemic species (12%) they increase our concern for species conservation of insular flora. A few decades before the eastern parts of the Little Andaman was deforested for rehabilitation of Bangladesh people and repatriates from Sri Lanka and Myanmar under various rehabilitation schemes. Simultaneously the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Forest Plantation and Development Corporation Limited also cleared ~1593 hectare forest area in the northeastern parts for oil palm cultivation. In December 2004 the east coast of the island was affected by the tsunami and damaged portions of littoral forest. Notably, the disturbed littoral forest recorded two and a half times lower tree diversity and ten times lower tree density as compared to the undisturbed littoral forest. Later the Government of India allotted the land for construction permanent shelters for tsunamiaffected people in the inland forest. These activities exert more pressure on the island flora. Thus in situ conservation of the insular flora of the Little Andaman Island which harbours moderate plant diversity but rich in local endemic species is emphasized because the endemics occur in small population and in scattered localities. We recommend long-term monitoring of the speciesrich evergreen forests and the littoral forest which harbours the endemic tree Manilkara littorallis for biodiversity changes and forest dynamics. Acknowledgements We thank the Director, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata and Deputy Director, Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Circle, Port Blairs, for allowing us to consult the herbaria and officials of Andaman & Nicobar Islands Forest Plantation and Development Corporation Limited, Port Blair, for field support. References Conclusions There is no doubt that primary rain forests are vanishing and that we are now living through the last decades of vegetation dating back as far as 30 Ayyappan, N. & N. Parthasarathy. 2001. Patterns of tree diversity within a large-scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest. Western Ghats, India. Ecotropica 5: 197-211. RASINGAM & PARATHASARATHY Balakrishnan, N.P. & M.K. Rao. 1983. The dwindling plant species of Andaman & Nicobar islands. pp. 186-210. In: S.K. Jain & R.R. Rao (eds.) An Assessment of Threatened Plants of India. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah. Bramwell, D. (ed.). 1979. Plants and Islands. Academic Press, London. Campbell, D.G., D.C. Daly, G.T. Prance & U.N. Maciel. 1986. Quantitative ecological inventory of terra firme and Varzea forest on the Rio Xingu, Brazilian Amazon. Brittonia 38: 369-393. Campbell, D.G., J.L. Stone & A. Rosas Jr. 1992. A comparison of the phytosociology and dynamics of three floodplain (Varzea) forest of known ages, Rio Jurua, western Brazilian Amazon. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 231-237. Champion, H.G. & S.K. Seth. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications. Government of India, New Delhi. Chittibabu, C.V. & N. Parthasarathy. 2000. Attenuated tree species diversity in human-impacted tropical evergreen forest sites at Kolli hills, Eastern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1493-1519. Cottom, G. & J.T. Curtis. 1956. The use of distance measures in the phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37: 451-460. Dawkins, H.C. 1959. The volume increment of natural tropical high-forest and limitations of improvements. Empire Forestry Review 38: 175-180. Hajra, P.K., B.P. Uniyal & P.S.N. Rao. 1999. Flora of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Vol. 1. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata. Hall, P. & K. Bawa. 1993. Methods to assess the impact of extraction of non-timber tropical forest products on plant populations. Economic Botany 47: 234-247. Halle, F. 1990. Tropical rain forests: structure and growth dynamics relative to utilization by birds. pp. 27-33. In: A. Keast (ed.) Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. 1990 SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, The Netherlands. Hare, M.A., D.O. Lantagne, P.G. Murphy & H. Chero. 1997. Structure and tree species composition in a subtropical dry forest in Dominican Republic: Comparison with a dry forest in Puerto Rico. Tropical Ecology 38: 1-17. Heaney, A. & J. Proctor. 1990. Preliminary studies of forest structure and floristics on Volcan Barva, Costa Rica. Journal Tropical Ecology 6: 307-320. Ho, C.C., D. Mc. C. Newbery & M.E.D. Poore. 1987. Forest composition and inferred dynamics in Jengka forest Reserve, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 3: 25-56. Jeffre, T. & J. M. Veillon. 1990. Etude Floristique et Structurale de deux forets denses humides sur 101 roches ultrabasiques en Nouvelle-Caledonie. Bulletin Museum Histoire Naturelle Paris 12(B): 243-273. Kadavul, K. & N. Parthasarathy. 1999. Plant biodiversity and conservation of tropical Semievergreen forest in the Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 421439. Kamarudin, I. 1986. Structure and species composition of lowland dipterocarp forest in Danum valley. B.Sc. Thesis, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Sabah. Khamyong, S., A.M. Lykke, D. Seramethakun & A.S. Barfod. 2004. Species composition and vegetation structure of an upper montane forest at summit of Mt. Doi Inthanon, Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 23: 83-97. Magurran, A. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jercy. Mani, S. & N. Parthasarathy. 2005. Biodiversity assessment of trees in five inland tropical dry evergreen forests of Peninsular India. Systematics and Biodiversity 3: 1-12. Manokaran, N. & K.M. Kochummen. 1987. Recruitment, growth and mortality of tree species in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 3: 315-330. Manokaran, N., V.J. La Frankie Jr. & R. Ismail. 1991. Stucture and composition of the Dipterocarpaceae in low land rainforest in peninsular Malaysia. pp. 317331. In: I. Soerianegara, S.S. Tjitrosomo, R.C. Umaly & I. Umboh (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Round-table Conference of Dipterocarps, Biotrop. Seameo Biotrop., Bogor. Special Publication No. 41. Martijena, N.E. & S.H. Bullock. 1994. Monospecific dominance of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Journal of Biogeography 21: 63-74. Meijer, W. 1959. Plant sociological analysis of montane rain forests near Jjibodes, west Java. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 8: 277-291. Mueller-Dombois, D. & H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Nadkarni, N.M., T.S. Matelson & W.A. Haber. 1995. Structural characteristics and floristic composition of neotropical cloud forest, Monte verde, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11: 481-495. Nascimento, M.T., J. Proctor & D.M. Villela. 1997. Forest structure, floristic composition and soils of an Amazonian monodominant forest on Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 54: 1-38. Newbery, D.Mc.C. & J.S. Gartlan. 1996. A structural analysis of rain forests at Korup and Douala-Edea, 102 TREE DIVERSITY IN LITTLE ANDAMAN ISLAND Cameroon. Proceedings of Royal Society Edinburgh 104B: 107-224. Padalia, H., N. Chauhan, M.C. Porwal & P. S. Roy. 2004. Phytosociological observations on tree species diversity of Andaman Islands, India. Current Science 87: 799-806. Paijmans, K. 1970. An analysis of four tropical rainforest sites in New Guinea. Journal of Ecology 58: 77-101. Parkinson, C.E. 1923. A Forest Flora of the Andaman Islands. Bishen Singh and Mahendrapal Singh, Dehradun. Parthasarathy, N. 1999. Tree diversity and distribution in undisturbed and human-impacted sites of tropical wet evergreen forest in southern Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 13651381. Parthasarathy, N. 2001. Changes in forest composition and structure in three sites of tropical evergreen forests around Sengaltheri, Western Ghats. Current Science 80: 389-393. Parthasarathy, N. & R. Karthikeyan. 1997. Plant biodiversity inventory and conservation of two tropical dry evergreen forests on the Coromandel coast, South India. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1063-1083. Parthasarathy, N., V. Kinhal & L. Praveenkumar. 1992. Plant species diversity and human impacts in the tropical wet evergreen forests of south Western Ghats. pp. 26-27. In: Indo-French Workshop on Tropical Forest Ecosystems: Natural Functioning and Anthropogenic Impact. French Institute, Pondicherry. Poore, M.E.D. 1968. Studies in Malaysian rainforest 1. The forest on Triassic sediments in Jengka forest reserve. Journal of Ecology 56: 143-196. Poulsen, A.D., I.V. Nielsen & H. Balslev. 1996. A quantitative inventory of trees in one hectare of mixed dipterocarp forest in Temburong, Brunei Durussalam. pp. 139-150. In: D.S. Edwards, W.E. Booth & S.C. Choy (eds.) Tropical Rain Forest Research-Current Issues. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Rao, M.K.V. 1986. A preliminary report on the angiosperms of Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Journal of Economic & Taxonomic Botany 8: 107 184. Read, J., P. Hallam & J. Cherrier. 1995. The anomaly of monodominant tropical rain forest: Some preliminary observations in the Nothafagusdominated rain forests of New Caledonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11: 359-389. Reddy, S.C., P.R.C. Prasad, M.S.R. Murthy & C.B.S. Dutt. 2004. Census of endemic flowering plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 28: 712-728. Renvoize, S.A. 1979. The origin of Indian Ocean Island floras. pp. 107-127. In: D. Bramwell (ed.) Plants and Islands. Academic Press, London. Richards, P.W. 1996. The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Thorington Jr, R.W., B. Tannenbaum, A. Tarak & R. Rudran. 1982. Distribution of trees on Barro Colorado Island: A five hectare sample. pp. 83-94. In: E.G. Leigh Jr., A.S. Rand & D.M. Windsor (eds.) The Ecology of a Tropical Forest-Seasonal Rhythms and Long-term Changes. Smithsonian Institute Press. Washington, DC. Torti, S.D., P.D. Coley & T.A. Kursar. 2001. Causes and consequences of monodominance in tropical lowland forests. American Naturalist 157: 141-153. Tripathi, K.P., S. Tripathi, T. Selvan, K. Kumar, K.K. Singh, S. Mehrotra & P. Pushpangadan. 2004. Community structure and species diversity of Saddle Peak forest in Andaman Island. Tropical Ecology 45: 241-250. Valencia, R., H. Balslev & Pazy Mino. 1994. High tree alpha diversity in Amazonian ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 21-28. Wattenberg, I. & S. Breckle. 1995. Tree species diversity of a premontane rain forest in the Cordillera de Tilaren, Costa Rica. Biotropica 1: 21-30. Whitmore, T.C. 1984. Tropical Rain Forest of the Far East. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Whitmore, T. C. & K. Sidiyasa. 1986. Composition and structure of a lowland rain forest at Torant, northern Sulawesi. Kew Bulletin 41: 747-756.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz