Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008 Nanometer-sized Titania hosted inside MOF-5 Maike Müller,a Xiaoning Zhanga, Yuemin Wangb and Roland A. Fischer*a Anorganische Chemie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany, Fax: +49 (0)234 32-14174; Tel: +49 (0)234 32-24174; E-mail: [email protected] a b Technische Chemie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Supporting Information XPS measurements were carried out in an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) set-up equipped with a high resolution Gammadata-Scienta SES 2002 analyzer. Monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV; anode operating at 14 kV and 55 mA) was used as incident radiation. The base pressure in the measurement chamber was around 2 ×10−10 mbar. XP spectra were recorded in the fixed transmission mode. The analyzer slit width was set to 0.4 mm and a pass energy of 200 eV was chosen, resulting in an overall energy resolution better than 0.7 eV. Charging effects were compensated by applying a flood gun. The binding energies were calibrated based on the hydrocarbon C1s peak at 285 eV. Prior to individual elemental scans a survey scan was taken for all the samples in order to detect all the elements present. Figure S1 XP survey spectra of the different MOF samples: (a) MOF-5; (b) TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) (c) TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed, 250°C 2d). Zn 2p O KLL Intensity / arb. units Zn LMM O 1s C 1s Ti 2p Zn 3p c b a 0 200 400 600 Binding Energy / eV 800 1000 Figure S2 High-resolution XP Zn 2p, Zn L3M45M45, C1s, O1s and Ti 2p spectra of MOF-5 and TiO2@MOF-5 samples (as-synthesized and annealed). Zn 2p Zn L3M45M45 2p3/2 1022.2 TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed) Intensity / arb. units Intensity / arb. units 2p1/2 1045.5 TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) MOF-5 1050 1040 1030 987.5 TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed) TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) MOF-5 975 1020 980 Binding energy / eV 985 990 995 1000 1005 Kinetic Energy / eV The Zn 2p spectrum shows two peaks at 1022.5 and 1045.5 eV which are assigned to the 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 components, respectively. The Zn 2p core levels are not sensitive to the oxidation state of zinc. The latter can be clearly identified by the Zn L3M45M45 Auger spectra. The corresponding peak observed at 987.5eV (kinetic energy, KE) demonstrates the presence of Zn2+ species in MOF-5 Intensity / arb. units C 1s 285 TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed) carbonylate 289.5 TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) 281.6 carbide 282.4 MOF-5 295 281 290 285 280 Binding energy / eV The C1s spectra are dominated by the intense hydrocarbon peak at 285 eV. The weak peak at 289.5 eV is characteristic for the carbonylate species (-COO) in MOF-5. In addition, a carbidic C1s peak is observed at 282.4 eV and shifts to lower binding energies after the modification of MOF-5 with TiO2, indicating the formation of TiC species. carbonylate 531.5 O 1s 528.6 Intensity /arb. units TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed) TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) MOF-5 540 535 530 525 520 Binding energy / eV The existence of the carbonylate species is also confirmed by the O1s peak at about 531.5 eV. For MOF-5, an additional peak is detected at 529.3 eV which is related to the presence of Zn4O groups in the MOFs structure. After the inclusion of TiO2, the oxide-related O 1s peak increases in intensity and shifts slightly to lower binding energies, revealing the formation of TiO2 species. Intensity / arb. units Ti 2p 2p1/2 2p3/2 464 458.5 TiO2@MOF-5 (annealed) 456.2 462.2 TiO2@MOF-5 (as-synthesized) 470 465 460 455 450 Binding energy / eV The formation of TiO2 is further identified by the XPS data for Ti 2p core levels. At room temperature, the doublet peak observed at 458.5 and 464 eV is characteristic for TiO2 species. Another doublet peak is seen at 456.2 and 462.2 eV which can originate from the TiO2 precursors (TiOiPr4). After heating to higher temperatures (T=250 °C), the TiO2 precursors further decompose to yield TiO2 as supported by the increase of the TiO2 relative concentration. Figure S3 TG/DTA of a TiO2@MOF-5 sample (as-synthesized). Figure S4 TG/DTA of TiO2@MOF-5 sample annealed at different temperatures in comparison to a typical MOF-5 sample.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz