Finding killer frog fungus in the Marshes: Joanne Ocock 2013 But it’s not really anything to worry about! Intro… Methods... Chytridiomycosis is a disease that frogs get from a fungus called Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis or Bd for short. It has dramatically affected amphibians, causing population declines in over 200 species worldwide. In Australia, most populations have disappeared in rainforests and streams along the east Coast (Figure 1). Generally, Bd is thought to not survive in hot, arid conditions. We obtained samples from 271 frogs over 13 species in Feb ‘09 and Nov ‘09 to March ’10 by swabbing their bellies and feet, and tested them for the presence of Bd. Figure 1. Distribution of Bd surveys in Australia showing localities where Bd was detected (black symbols) and not detected (white symbols). The Macquarie Marshes, is indicated by a star, and positive records in the arid zone (light grey shading, <500 mm annual rainfall). Conclusions... Volunteer Richard Tate swabs a green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) Results... These were a little surprising. Seventeen individuals from seven species tested positive. This was unexpected, because due to the high temperatures and dry conditions of the Marshes, Bd was not really expected to occur at all in the area. However, all individuals had a very low infection load, well below what generally causes frogs to die in other areas. The killer fungus seems to occur in the Marshes, but it doesn’t have much killing power, which is great news! But to really say for sure, we’d need to test frogs again during cold months when frogs are more vulnerable to the fungus to likely to get sick. The study was valuable because we showed assumptions about Bd were wrong, and that there is a lot more to learn about how the fungus behaves and survives in semi-arid regions in Australia. Acknowledgments... We thank R. Jones G & L Hall, S & K Earl, D Thornton, M & P Simpson and R. McConichie for access to the Marshes. Rachel V. Blakey, 2013 In this flooded river red gum forest, I recorded over 1000 bats with one bat detector in a single night! We recorded 4 times as many bats in wet habitats than in dry habitats. Bats are everywhere! They occur on every continent except Antarctica, and in the Macquarie Marshes there’s at least 12 different species! Long-eared bats prefer to fly under cover of trees. They prefer river red gums but we also recorded them foraging in the dry forest near the school. Freetail bats are fast flyers and not shy of flying out in the open, these bats were most common foraging over the open swamps like these reed beds. For every different type of environment in the Macquarie Marshes there’s a type of bat that uses it. The Little Pied bat, a threatened species, were most common foraging over these dry open paddocks. Since they can eat up to their bodyweight in insects per night, just think of what they can do for our crops! Bats love wetlands and rivers. They need to drink water regularly, especially females who are nursing young. They also feast on all the insects that emerge from watercourses and some bats even catch fish. We identify bat species by catching them or by looking at their calls. This distinctive Little Pied bat call has an alternating frequency. Excerpt from Honours Project by Claire Sives, 2011 Supervisor: Dr Kim Jenkins Co-supervisor: Dr Debashish Mazumder How important is River Red Gum carbon as an energy source in floodplain ecosystems? Introduction Carbon is the energy currency that drives floodplain foodwebs. This study looked at carbon in three different flood regimes- high (1-3 years), medium (4-7 years) and low frequency (8+ years between floods). Specifically we were interested in: - The availability of River Red Gum carbon in floodplain sediments. - What zooplankton will emerge from sediments when flooded? - Will the zooplankton use River Red Gum carbon as an energy source? This research is important to determine the knock-on impacts of the reduction of RRG due to altered flooding regimes in the Marshes. Methods Dry topsoils from the three different flood regimes were inundated in the lab and sampled over time to determine carbon content and consumption by emerging zooplankton. How do we know whether RRG carbon was there and being consumed? Each plant (and algae) has its own carbon stable isotope signature (a ratio of 13C/12C), this signature can be detected in plants, water, sediment, detritus and the creatures in floodplain waters. Ostracods - Cladocerans Results High flood frequency contained fresh River Red Gum, medium flood frequency areas contained aged Red Gum and low frequency flood areas contained chenopods and grasses. Highest diversity and abundances of zooplankton emerged in high flood frequency areas, less in medium and few in low flood frequency areas. Cladocerans, consumed River Red Gum where is was available and switched to chenopods and grasses in low flood frequency areas. Ostracods did not consume the predominant carbon resources and were in far lower abundances than cladocerans. 1mm Conclusion The study indicated that - some microinvertebrates consume basic floodplain carbon resources - and extended drying of floodplain wetlands may impact carbon sources that support floodplain foodwebs. We also found that stable isotope analysis is a useful tool in floodplain management. This method can detect changes in floodplain resources and micro-scale linkages at a basic trophic level. This is particularly pertinent as changes in microinvertebrate ecology are often early warning signs of declining in floodplain health. High flood frequency - Healthy River Red Gum - Medium flood frequency - Unhealthy/dead RRGum - Low flood frequency - Chenopods/grasses - Thanks go to Leonie and Adam Coleman at ‘Wilgara’, Garry and Leanne Hall at ‘The Mole’, Doug and Chris Andrews at ‘Messines’ and Ray Jones, Field Officer out in the beautiful Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz