Indigenous Peoples in Central Africa: the Case of the Pygmies Quentin Wodon, Mohamed Arbi Ben-Achour, and Prospere Backiny-Yetna World Bank Presentation made on December 20, 2010 at the World Bank’s workshop on Indigenous Peoples, Human Development and Poverty, Washington, DC Introduction The Pygmies are the Indigenous People of Central Africa (CAR, DRC, Gabon, others) They are one of the most vulnerable minority in one of the poorest regions of the world Therefore it is especially importance to take into account their specific needs and how they may benefit/suffer from development projects. But data sources to assess the pygmies’ wellbeing are scarce - the population is relatively small and thus not well represented in surveys Contribution & Today’s Presentation Part I: First robust estimates of poverty and human development indicators for the pygmies CAR: 2003 national census DRC: 2004-05 survey Gabon: 2003 national census & poverty mapping Part II: Qualitative/institutional analysis, part of ESW to inform a pygmy strategy for the DRC Also: Review of literature (not presented today) Summary paper for the global indigenous study, plus an edited volume with more detailed studies 1. Quantitative Analysis, 3 countries How many pygmies are there? Census: 3,000 Gabon (<1%), 10,000 CAR (<1%) DRC: anywhere from 60,000 to 700,000 (1%) Previous estimates: 100,000 to 250,000 2004-05 household survey with weights: 63,097 Dynamique Pygmée: 450,000; NGOs for ESW: 660,000 Province Equateur Province Orientale Bandundu Oriental Occidental Maniema Katanga Nord Kivu Sud Kivu Total Number % of total Name Lifestyle 172,197 16,804 56,210 n.d n.d 4,452 320,930 25,871 63,600 660,064 26% 3% 8% Twa Mbuti Twa n.d n.d Twa Twa Twa Twa Sedentary or semi-sedentary Nomads in process of sedentarization Semi-sedentary Nomads Nomads Semi-sedentary Sedentary Sedentary Sedentary 1% 48% 4% 10% 100% Where do pygmies live? Case of DRC Mostly rural, some still living in forests, but sedentarization Some geographic concentration, but still widespread dispersion in huge country Costly to carry census of pygmy population, but required for better knowledge How poor are the pygmies? CAR Asset-based wealth indicator for now (poverty mapping using 2003 census and 2007 QUIBB household survey to be conducted soon) Two “indigenous” groups: Pygmies and Mbororos 90% of pygmies in poorest quintile of wealth Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Total Mbororos 46.7 14.0 13.1 11.6 14.6 100 Pygmy 89.7 6.2 2.4 0.9 0.8 100 Non-indigenous 21.0 18.7 20.1 20.1 20.1 100 All 21.4 18.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 100 National How poor are the pygmies? CAR Education indicators, pop. 15 year and older (%) Five times less likely to be still in school Twice as likely to have no education at all Still in school None Incomplete Primary Complete Primary Secondary University Mbororo Pygmy Non indigenous Male Female All Male Female All Male Female All 2.6 1.0 1.8 3.6 1.1 2.3 13.5 7.0 10.2 If not in school, highest achievement 93.8 97.3 95.5 86.3 93.6 90.1 41.3 66.1 53.9 2.7 1.3 2.0 11.3 5.7 8.4 19.8 14.5 17.1 1.3 2.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.9 1.5 0.1 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.1 12.4 24.3 2.2 6.7 12.2 0.5 9.4 18.2 1.3 How poor are the pygmies? DRC Very small sample size in household survey (29 out of 12,000 households), but estimations indicative Higher poverty, lower schooling/literacy, working School enrollment rate (6-11 years) Literacy rate (15+ years) Labor force part. 15+ years) Unemployment rate (15+ years) NonPygmy 56.1 65.0 73.8 6.2 90.2 71.7 32.4 18.1 Pygmy 18.7 30.5 85.9 1.0 100.0 84.8 39.4 25.1 All 56.0 64.9 73.8 6.2 90.2 71.7 32.3 18.0 Share in Sq. informal Poverty Poverty poverty sector incidence gap gap How poor are the pygmies? Gabon Poverty mapping technique using 2003 census and 2005 QUIBB household survey Squared poverty gap ratio pygmy/non-pygmy: >3 Per capita consumption (Fcfa per year) Poverty indicators Pygmy Non-Pygmy All Share of population in poverty 70.1 32.7 32.8 Poverty Gap Squared Poverty Gap Average Median 30.0 10.7 10.7 16.4 4.9 4.9 342896 760399 760067 303282 587879 587589 How poor are the pygmies? Gabon Education indicators, pop. 15 year and older (%) More than four times less likely to be still in school Almost four times more likely to have no education at all Still in school Male 6.7 None Incomp. Primary Complete Primary Secondary University 66.4 23.4 7.4 1 0.3 Pygmy Non-Pygmy Female All Male Female All 3.4 5 21.9 22.3 22.1 If not in school, highest achievement 67.4 66.9 14.1 21.4 17.7 24.2 23.8 11.3 15.7 13.5 1.4 4.3 13.3 16.3 14.8 0.5 0.7 43.4 34.7 39.1 0 0.1 9.6 3.9 6.8 All 22.1 17.8 13.5 14.8 39 6.8 2. Qualitative/Institutional Analysis, DRC World Bank ESW –Complex set of issues Some of the main issues are: Citizenship and registration Access to health services education, potable water and sanitation Access to land, agriculture and livestock Environmental protection, forest zoning Pygmy leadership capacity Improvement of housing, quality of life Sensitization of the public authorities (nationally, regionally and locally) to Pygmy-related issues Evolution of localization, lifestyle Traditionally nomadic hunter-gatherers Pocess of semi-sedentarization under way since the 1960s, with today only about 20 000 still being nomad hunter-gatherers Socioeconomic and cultural specificity eroding over time Forests as natural habitats to which they are closely attached, but threatened by expansion of agricultural activities in forests, uncontrolled mining and logging, unplanned settlements (e.g. war) Many abandon traditional lifestyle and seek shelter along main roads and next to larger villages and towns. No land ownership and limited use rights and access to farm land and natural resources (Bantu customary law) Horizontal societal organization (absence of hierarchy) Speak own dialect; Have separate customary rules-regulations. Perceive themselves and are perceived by Bantu as a distinct cultural and ethnic group Relations with social environment Land acquisition depends on consent of Bantu traditional “owners” and the payment of tributes Limited know-how and experience with agriculture Pygmies compelled to offer their labor to Bantu farmers for low wage rates or in exchange for basic food Limited income opportunities and povert Malnutrition and marginalization Historically harmonious trade relationships between Bantus and Pygmies gradually deteriorating and evolving towards Bantu domination and Pygmy subservience Pygmies suffer from discrimination and abuse, then interiorize negative attitudes Lack of confidence, Shame, Negation of own culture Citizenship – De jure and de facto De jure Equal citizens according to Constitution Equal rights (to justice, education, healthcare, judiciary, freedom of association and expression) No special status as Indigenous Peoples, but protection of minorities in Art. 51 of Constitution De facto Majority does not know their rights, often not registered citizens, No ID, birth certificate etc. Low participation in elections up until recently Number of obstacles for candidacies Access to judiciary and customary laws Very limited access to judiciary, legal system Own customary law not recognized Land ownership and administrative land division (districts, sectors etc) regulated according to Bantu customary law Reinforced by recent legislation, e.g Forestry Code Makes land ownership, community forest concessions and administrative representation nearly impossible However, new form of Pygmy representation through localité chiefs and emergence of small number of Pygmy and support organizations Education and health High illiteracy rates: 80% and up to 100% for women Low schooling rates (20% for primary education) Alarming health care indicators (high infant and maternal mortality, high prevalence of infectious diseases, parasites, AIDS and other STDs) Obstacles to better schooling/health outcomes Lifestyle (nomadic intervals, hygiene) Discrimination by teachers/fellow students, healthcare officials Distance to schools, health centers, vaccination campaigns Child labor, fees and high costs of books/material Illiterate parents, alcoholism, lack of information, endemic malnutrition, isolation Conclusion With limited resources and opportunities, the Pygmies are facing increasing marginalization, and social and economic impoverishment (e.g., poor health, alcoholism, loss of idenity, social fragmentation, and limited access to schooling) Pygmy culture has been internationally recognized as a universal patrimony, but unless this process can be reversed, it will lead to the loss of the Pygmies’ identity and cultural memory. Recommendations Capacity building Access to education (alternative learning/teaching techniques adapted to semi-nomad lifestyle), healthcare Improve Pygmy representation in the administration, relationship between communities (Pygmy and Bantu) 15 year, phased program, based on national consensus, to be developed by government and funded by donors Creation of Interministerial Committee and implementing agency for recommendations in various sectors of concern Pygmy Act endorsing their status as an indigenous people, special needs and rights
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz