Tank Spacing Using Radiant Heat Modeling How Realistic are the Models? Kris Thorsteinsson ΔP Risk Inc. www.deltaprisk.com Pool Fire Models Based on Fire Tests Flames from large hydrocarbon fires are modeled as a mainly smoke-obscured sooty portion with a luminous lower band and periodic luminous spotting throughout Luminous flame areas have a surface emissive power (SEP) of about 140 kW/m² and smokecovered areas a much lower SEP of about 20 kW/m² Researchers noted the ”unintuitive” effect that as the diameters of medium / heavy hydrocarbon pool fires increase the radiative fraction or % of luminous flame to total flame surface decreases They developed formulae relating diameter to radiative fraction (Fs), e.g., a 15m crude oil pool fire has an Fs of 17% and an average SEP of 40 kW/m2 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 2 Pool Fire Model SEP Calculations Calculations using Mudan & Croce formulae result in hydrocarbon pool fires with diameters of 30 m and higher modeled as essentially all smoky, with very little luminous flame. 40m and larger fires modeled with <1% luminous flame Average SEP is close to the value for smoke of 20 kW/m², very much less than the value for luminous flame of 140 kW/m² D(m) SEP (kw/m2) 1 2 3 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 70 100 126.4 114.4 103.7 85.9 56.1 39.8 30.9 23.3 21.0 20.3 20.0 20.0 10/Jan/2007 Fs (radiative fraction) 0.90 0.82 0.74 0.61 0.40 0.28 0.22 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 ΔP Risk Inc. % flame % soot or smoke 88.69% 78.66% 69.77% 54.88% 30.12% 16.53% 9.07% 2.73% 0.82% 0.25% 0.02% 0.00% 11.31% 21.34% 30.23% 45.12% 69.88% 83.47% 90.93% 97.27% 99.18% 99.75% 99.98% 100.00% 3 Large Tank Fires Accepted fire models for these large tanks would calculate a radiative fraction of <1% i.e. <1% of flame surface on average is comprised of luminous flame, or >99% of flame is hidden by smoke on average These photos suggest a more realistic Fs of 30%+ Also noted is the upwind effect of a higher % of luminous flame, possibly outweighing the flame tilting effect 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 4 Significance of Model Accuracy Thermal radiation modeling for tank layout and spacing is recommended by insurance / risk management (e.g. GE GAP) and industry (e.g. Energy Institute / Institute of Petroleum) guidelines Emergency response plans, fixed and portable fire-fighting provisions and tertiary containment systems may be based on reliable modeling 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 5 Singapore 1988 Straight Run Naphtha Tank Fire – Escalation by Radiant Heat Tank #1 full surface fire underway, little or no wind Tank #2 at left, 21m from Tank #1 starting to burn at rim seal area after 2 hours A Mudan & Croce based model (using default SEP and radiative fraction values) indicates only 4 kW/m2 at Tank #2, and 8 kW/m2 at 5m distance from Tank #1 Other models and observation suggest 25-30 kW/m2 radiation level at Tank #2 which is more realistic given the fire spread The Singapore Tank Fire Protection study indicated adjacent tank fire escalation at 0.5 Diameter separation in 2.8 hours 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 6 Possible Explanations for Higher Observed SEP in Tank Fires v Pan Test Fires Heat feedback from the fire to the flammable material has a great effect on vaporization rate and fire intensity Tank shell heating up and radiating back into the fire would progressively increase with time A partial chimney effect may occur increasing turbulence and overall oxygenation above the tank shell The rate of burning eventually becomes more like volatile light end hydrocarbons which typically do not demonstrate reduced Fs with increasing diameter 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 7 References “Fire Hazard Calculations for Large Open Hydrocarbon Fires” Mudan & Croce, 1984 TNO Yellow Book “Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects” CPR 14E 3rd Edition 1997 “Fire Precautions at Petroleum Refineries and Bulk Storage Installations” Energy Institute / IP, 2nd Edition 2007 GE GAP 2.5.2 “Oil & Chemical Plant Layout & Spacing”, 2001 “Investigation of a Naphtha Storage Tank Fire” Baker Engineering & Risk, 2004 “Thermal Radiation from Large Pool Fires” NIST 2000 10/Jan/2007 ΔP Risk Inc. 8
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz