MINISTERIAL STATEMENT BY MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND WATER RESOURCES, MR MASAGOS ZULKIFLI, ON THE ELECTED PRESIDENCY FOR THE SITTING OF PARLIAMENT ON 9 NOVEMBER 2016 Madam Speaker 1 I support the Bill. Singapore today is a country with a rich diversity that we value, respect and celebrate. We see this in our surroundings, where we can find a mosque within the vicinity of a Chinese home or a church close to Muslim homes. It is even more amazing to a visitor to find a mosque beside a Chinese temple! We see this as our children go to school in traditional costumes to celebrate Racial Harmony Day and learn about the virtues of strength in diversity. We feel this inclusiveness when we get invited to open houses during Chinese New Year, Hari Raya Puasa and Deepavali or to weddings of friends of a different race. 2 Indeed, we are becoming more socially diverse as well. The proportion of inter-ethnic marriages has almost doubled from a decade ago. Last year, 21.5 per cent of marriages were inter-ethnic marriages. We have new citizens and immigrants setting up home in Singapore, enriching our diversity. 3 We have benefited from the peace and prosperity from our racial and religious harmony and made our diversity work for us. Our interpretation of multiracialism, has thus far, forged strong bonds among Singaporeans, and also engendered trust between the people and the Government. Indeed it is only with this peace and with the trust between the people and the Government, that we can have an open discussion on amending the Constitution on the Elected Presidency. 1 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] 4 There are three major pillars upon which we have built our multiracial and multi religious social compact and earned us our peace and harmony. These pillars need to be continually tended to, strengthened or modified while keeping an eye on achieving the objectives of a workable and peaceful multiracial and multi religious society. POLICIES WHICH EMPHASISE ON INCLUSIVITY 5 The first of these three pillars is our policies around building an inclusive society which are both multiracial and multi religious. Our policies have long been the cornerstones to preserve this sense of inclusiveness of all races, in order to build a sense of equity within the community and political system. 6 Policies that have steered us towards this sense of inclusiveness are reflected over the years: In 1965, when we became an independent nation, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew made a promise to Singaporeans to build a multiracial nation. He said and I quote: "We are going to be a multi-racial nation in Singapore. We will set an example. This is not a Malay nation; this is not a Chinese nation; this is not an Indian nation. Everyone will have his place, equal: language, culture, religion." To assuage the minorities, particularly the Malays who became a minority overnight, this commitment towards the inclusion of all Singaporeans has been worded in our Constitution under Article 152(1) – it states that ‘It shall be the responsibility of the Government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in 2 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] Singapore’ with special recognition for the position of the Malays as the indigenous people of Singapore. In 1970, the Presidential Council for Minority Rights was established to examine all legislation to ensure that they are not disadvantageous to any racial or religious community as compared to other such communities1. Since 1988, our society’s multi-racialism has been safeguarded in our Parliamentary system through the Group Representation Constituency (GRC), where at least one of the Member of Parliament must belong to one of the minority racial communities2. The Ethnic Integration Policy, which was introduced in March 1989, aims to ensure a balanced racial mix in every neighbourhood and block which approximates the general population. This has promoted racial integration and harmony in HDB estates – it’s how many of us grew up – smelling and learning to love each other’s cooking; going to school together; visiting each other’s homes during festivals; and familiarising ourselves with the significant occasions at our void decks – be it weddings or birthday celebrations, funerals – allowing each to celebrate or grieve. 1 Source: http://www.istana.gov.sg/roles-and-responsibilities/presidents-office/other-presidential-councils The other responsibilities of the Council include: a. Considering matters affecting any racial or religious community that are referred to it by Parliament or the Government. b. In its advisory capacity, the Council advises the President on nominations of appointees to the Presidential Council for Religious Harmony (under the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act), the Malay Community Committee, and the Indian and Other Minorities Communities Committee (under the Parliamentary Elections Act). 2 Source: http://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_type_electoral.html#group 3 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] The amendment to the Elected Presidency, to me, is a continuation of the policy enhancement that we need from time to time to preserve this need to build an inclusive multi-racial society. 7 Now, who we elect as President must be representative of who we are and what we stand for as Singaporeans. With the Elected Presidency, the principle of meritocracy applies – we must elect the best person for the job. However, our value system is not singularly about meritocracy; in as much as competence is key, it is also as a matter of principle, that our elected president is a person of integrity. These two principles, meritocracy and integrity translate for competence and honesty, both necessary elements to the character of the Elected President, performing the custodial role. 8 However, the Elected President also plays a symbolic role as the head of state representing the multiracial society of Singapore and at the same time, he or she must be able to connect with all Singaporeans. Ideally since the Elected Presidency was first enacted in 1990, an Elected President of each ethnic group would have been represented and elected, but unfortunately this has not been the case. 9 The Channel News Asia and the Institute of Policy Studies survey on race relations was published recently in August 20163. The survey notes that while there is a majority of respondents of all races who would accept a minority race as President, if given a choice, most would prefer someone of the same race as them to become the nation’s Prime Minister or President. I do not believe this is from a sense of deep prejudice or bigotry more than it is a sense of comfort and convenience to choose someone similar to yourself. 3 Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/most-singaporeans-want/3053092.html 4 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] 10 This is apparent when based on the same findings, 59 percent of Chinese would still say yes to a Malay President, while 75 percent of Malays said yes to an Indian President. In an ideal scenario, people will vote independent of racial lines, but the fact is that racial preference is primordial and a natural inclination. It exists today everywhere, not just in Singapore, but in all societies, including the US where ethnic-based campaign counts much in their elections. Therefore in Singapore too, if left unchecked, the current rules will more probable than not, elect a president of the majority race for a long time to come. 11 Indeed, just because we have learned to live with our differences and can cherish them, does not mean the differences don’t matter or the differences have disappeared. 12 So, I am glad that one of the proposed changes that will be introduced to the Elected Presidency is to have a reserve Presidential Election for a racial group, if they are not represented after five continuous terms. This will assuage the minorities particularly. I have heard support from my community for this in town hall dialogues I conducted. Actually, every time Presidential candidates are announced, I would be accosted by them with remarks of disappointment because a Malay candidate is not contesting. Of course it goes away months after, but it never fails to crop up when the Presidential Election season arrives again. 13 These grouses seem a minor matter. Just a small unhappiness. It goes away. PM cited last week’s massive demonstration in Jakarta which ended in violence. It was triggered by off-hand comments as part of a contest for high political office. What was allegedly said in that comment had religious 5 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] connotations and perceived as an insult to believers. Just one sentence was enough to enrage many people. Political actors allegedly took advantage of the situation to fuel sentiments further. Seemingly small things can and do snow ball too, especially when they cut into primordial instincts about race and religion over time. That is why, it is good that we address this seemingly small issue on ethnic representation of our Elected President – because it is a matter touching race or religion - before it accumulates over time and snowballs with other issues into an avalanche. 14 The right policies on its own, though, will not guarantee racial and religious harmony – it’s no silver bullet. Clearly, however, the wrong policies will destroy this harmony. One policy of the Sri Lankan government in 1944 making Sinhalese the sole official language, excluded Tamil speaking minorities from the civil service and limited entry into universities. Other policies came in succession and continued marginalising Tamil-speaking minorities. The burning down of the Jaffna Library in 1981 was probably the ultimate trigger of 26 years of ‘bombs, bullets, carnage and suffering’ from civil war4. Madam Speaker INTEGRATION IS A TWO-WAY STREET 15 While we have come a long way from the tumultuous times when there was strife between communities, we cannot take for granted the peaceful coexistence that we have today. Even as the government moves to assuage the care and concern it has for minority communities by introducing new laws or modifying them, both the minorities and the dominant community 4 Norwegian book on Civil War in Sri Lanka 6 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] have crucial roles to play to forge the trust and harmony that the government seeks to build through an inclusive society. 16 Inclusivity is a two-way street. Inclusivity would not be successful had the minorities not been responsive. Minorities had participated actively in and continuously built our common spaces; even as minorities, we seek to preserve our identity and culture. Sometimes, integration involved everyone making sacrifices of what is important because it mattered to the others. This proactive effort at integration by the minorities makes a crucial second pillar for our harmony. Puan Speaker, in Malay 17 Kehidupan harmoni berbilang kaum dan agama yang kita nikmati dan harungi selama ini adalah hasil yang terbina melalui tiga tunggak utama. 18 Tiang pertama adalah dasar-dasar baik Pemerintah, yang buat sekian lama sentiasa memastikan bahawa setiap warga dan kaum merasakan suasana kekitaan dan inklusif, demi menghasil dan memupukkan rasa saksama di dalam masyarakat dan sistem politiknya. Ini termasuk: a. Pada hari kemerdekaan Singapura, mendiang Encik Lee Kuan Yew berikrar akan membina sebuah negara yang berbilang kaum yang saksama. Komitmen tersebut diperteguhkan lagi di Perlembagaan negara kita pada Artikel 152(1) – yang merakamkan tanggungjawab Pemerintah untuk sentiasa menjaga kepentingan semua kaum minoriti di Singapura. 7 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] b. Pada 1970 pula Majlis Presiden bagi Hak Minoriti telah ditubuhkan. c Sistem Kawasan Undi Perwakilan Berkumpulan (GRC) di wujudkan pada tahun 1988 supaya adanya calon minoriti dalam barisan calon Pilihan Raya demi mengelakkan politik berbaur perkauman. d Setahun kemudian, Dasar Integrasi Etnik untuk memastikan dilaksakan supaya terdapat keseimbangan kaum kepada jumlah penduduk di setiap estet perumahan awam. 19 Penggubalan Perlembagaan untuk membolehkan seorang calon dari setiap kaum menjadi Presiden diPilih adalah satu lagi proses penyesuaian yang dilakukan kali ini untuk mengatasi situasi yang kurang mendokong perlantikan Presiden dari kaum minoriti selama ini. Ia disambut baik oleh masyarakat Melayu yang juga inginkan calon dari kaum kami – seorang yang layak, berkebolehan dan amanah. Saya menyambutnya dengan baik. 20 Namun, sebanyak apapun Pemerintah prihatin dan berusaha menjaga kebajikan kaum minoriti, kededua pihak – baik minoriti mahupun kaum dominan – mempunyai peranan penting untuk memupuk dan mengukuhkan kepercayaan dan menanam sifat hormat menghormati antara satu sama lain supaya keharmonian dapat terus kita nikmati. 21 Pada masa yang sama, kita harus akur bahawa proses integrasi penting untuk keharmonian. Saya gembira kerana sebagai kaum minoriti, masyarakat Melayu/Islam telah lama bersungguh-sungguh berintegrasi dengan masyarakat am Singapura. Tanpa bertongkatkan system kebajikan, 8 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] mereka dapat mengecapi kehidupan moden bersama rakyat lain secara meritokrasi, namun pada masa yang sama masih berupaya mengekalkan identiti sebagai seorang Melayu/Islam. Inilah tunggak kedua keharmonian kita. 22 Dalam proses berintegrasi pula, kaum minoriti sentiasa mahu melihat dan merasakan layanan tulus pihak majoriti atau dominan dalam mewujudkan masyarakat inklusif; dan ini tiada bezanya juga dengan Singapura. Penerimaan kaum minoriti yang tulus yang mewujudkan semangat kekitaan. Inilah yang menjadi tunggak ketiga keharmonian kaum di negara kita. Saya akan menghuraikan hal ini dalam Bahasa Inggeris. Madam Speaker SENSE OF BELONGING 23 In many countries, where there is a dominant majority and significant minorities, we see a whole spectrum of how multiracialism is lived. This ranges from the negative – such as with oppression and rejection, to simply ignoring them to let them live any way they want, to the positive – integrating and embracing them as full-fledged members of the community. There are also societies that force minority into assimilation. We are a working model multiracial society because of the sense of belonging of our minorities. 24 The sense of belonging of our minorities is crucial in ensuring that Singapore remains resilient against any force that threatens to tear our society apart. 9 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] As minorities adjust to integrate, they continuously sense whether the majority is embracing the ‘inclusive society’. It is no different for Singapore. The warm embrace of the majority (and consequently a sense of belonging by the minorities) makes the final third foundation for our multiracial society to live in harmony. On the contrary, in countries which instead play up racial and religious differences by the dominant community, we see unhappiness within the minority community festering and in certain cases, exploited. 25 Everyone here would be familiar with the Iraq conflict and pronouncement of territories of the Islamic Caliphate by ISIS. But what is more interesting is that individuals from minority groups from countries so far away have joined this war. The Soufan Group estimates 27,000 foreign fighters at the end of 2015. Why that many? I heard former US Undersecretary of Department of Home Security Jane Lute said: “they came from everywhere because they belonged to nowhere”. There is at least a battalion of Uighur and Chechen fighters within ISIS. BBC reported “It’s the general colonial attitude of the Han Chinese officials to Uighurs that generate huge resentment.” In the end, there were violent clashes between the Muslim Uighurs and Han Chinese in Xinjiang, China5 such as that in 2014 as a result of the radicalisation of the Uighurs. In Chechnya, what started out as a nationalist uprising in Russia’s north Caucasus region in the 1990s was met by a brutal clampdown, which in turn spawned a violent Islamist movement. Chechnyan and Uighur militants spilled their fight to Syria hoping they can feel they belong and can call it home. 5 Source: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21611067-iron-fist-xinjiang-fuelling-insurrection-chinasleadership-must-switch-tactics 10 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] 26 Thus today, we see that the rejection or sense of rejection of a minority group in the community, or the use of force to make them conform to the majority, have not only caused a loss in a sense of belonging but often resulted in dire consequences, with some of the oppressed turning towards violence and terrorism. 27 Even Singapore is not immune to the growing threat of terrorism. The Government has arrested a dozen Singaporeans, most of whom were selfradicalised. Several intended to go to the Middle East to join ISIS, and a few were planning to mount attacks in Singapore. 28 The threat is real, and our best measure in tackling terrorism is to strengthen the sense of belonging of the minorities, and in today’s context for the Muslims and Malays in Singapore. We need this sense of belonging and an inclusive society to be pervasive even while the Muslim communities fortify their strength within to repel this threat. It is this sense of belonging that motivates Muslim leaders in Singapore to stand ready to come forward to defuse conflicts, and not exploit them nor goad the community to extremism or terrorism. In no small measure too, it is this sense of belonging that the community has responded to reject extremism and terrorism. Madam Speaker CONCLUSION 29 I am grateful we in Singapore, continue to tend to our racial harmony with great care and concern. The amendment of the Constitution to ensure all ethnic groups a chance at becoming an Elected President will be 11 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] remembered as a prudent foresight of the Government and a great generosity of the majority. In the passing of this amendment, I see a continued effort at acknowledging the aspirations of my community and all other minorities, and thus, see a commitment to our multiracial and multi religious compact. My community and I appreciate this. 30 At the end of the day, racial inclusiveness and harmony is up to us – you and me. Our diversity will only become our strength, if we consciously ensure that the generosity to be inclusive are ingrained into our fabric of society. It has to be embodied in our thoughts and actions. This responsibility cannot solely rest on Government, nor can it be just a topdown approach. Everyone needs to play a part in this. To integrate. To embrace. To understand and adapt. This sense of inclusiveness in Singapore is unique, and we need to continue working hard to preserve this. 31 Yesterday the Americans voted. I do not know what the outcome is yet. But I read in International Herald Tribune, an article by Imbolo Mbue who is the author of the novel “Behold the Dreamers.” She migrated from Cameroon and became a US citizen and wrote: “I’ve seen the best of America during my time here. When I was considering dropping out of graduate school because of financial constraints, an American professor helped me get a scholarship so I could complete my master’s degree. Twice, I had an American co-worker give me hand-me-downs because I couldn’t afford to buy clothes. An American employer once said to me, at a time when I was questioning who I was, “You are a breath of fresh air.” Being black, female and an immigrant — and for a good portion of my life here, low-income, too — I’ve weathered my share of prejudice. But the empathy Americans have shown me far outweighs the unkindness. That is why on Election Day, I’ll be voting for empathy.” 12 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016] 32 Yesterday too, I felt a poignant moment when PM said "As Minister Yaacob Ibrahim observed yesterday, this would be our first Malay Elected President after more than 46 years, since our first President Encik Yusof Ishak.” And PM finished with “I look forward to this." There was spontaneous applause from my colleagues. Chinese and minorities alike. I felt generosity. I felt empathy. That is why for this amendment Bill, I too am voting for empathy. 33 Thank you. 13 [Updated as at 9 Nov 2016]
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz