THE CAMPUS
COMPUTING PROJECT
November, 2009
www.campuscomputing.net
The 2009 National Survey of Information Technology in U.S. Higher Education
IT Budgets Are Down - Again!
For the second time in the current
computing, eLearning, and information
decade, campus technology officials are
technology. “College and university IT
struggling with significant IT budget cuts
units were just beginning to recover from
against the rising demand for IT resources
the budget cuts that came early in the
and services. Fully half (50 percent) of
decade. There is no question that the
the institutions participating in the 2009
current round of budget reductions will
Campus Computing Survey report budhave consequences that affect IT infraget cuts affecting central IT services for
structure, instructional resources, and user
support services.
the current academic year, compared to
less than a third (30.6 percent)
in 2008 and just 13.1 percent
IT Budget Cuts, 2006-2009
in 2007. Concurrently, the
percentage of institutions reporting a budget cut in central IT services, 2006-2009
proportion of campuses report70
ing increased funding for central IT services fell from half
60
(49 percent) in 2008 to a fifth
50
(21.4 percent) in 2009.
Public institutions have
40
been hardest hit by the current
30
IT budget cuts: fully two-thirds
(67.1 percent) of public uni20
versities reported budget cuts
affecting central IT services
10
for 2009, as did almost two0
thirds (62.8 percent) of public
ALL
Public
Private
Public 4-Yr.
Private 4-Yr.
four-year colleges. In conINSTITUTIONS
University
University
College
College
trast, just over a third (36.9
2006
2007
2008
2009
percent) of community colleges experienced central IT
budget cuts this year. Among
Single Most Important IT Issue, Fall 2009
independent institutions, more
"single most important IT isuse adffecting my campuses
over the next 2-3 years, percentages fall 2009
than half (56.9 percent) of pri18
vate research universities and
16
two-fifths (41.9 percent) of
14
private four-year colleges also
12
reported reduced resources for
central IT services for the cur10
rent academic year.
8
“These new budget cuts
6
will play havoc with institu4
tional efforts to respond to the
2
rising demand for IT resources
and services,” says Kenneth
0
IT
IT User
Upgrading
IT
Instructional
Upgrading
C. Green, founding director of
Support Administrative/ Staffing
Finance
Integration
Network and
ERP Systems
of IT
The Campus Computing
Data Security
Project, the nation’s largest
The budget challenges confronting
campus IT officers are reflected in the
annual polling about the “single most
important IT issue confronting my campus over the next two-three years.” In
past years the polling provided a clear
“leader” - an issue that might garner the
votes of a clear plurality of the respondents. In the early part of the
decade, a majority of survey
participants identified the instructional integration of information technology as the single
most important issue confronting their institution over the
next two-three years. More recently, IT security concerns
emerged as the leading issue
among a plurality of survey
participants. However, in 2009,
two issues – network/data security and IT financing each
received about 15 percent of
the votes of the survey respondents. And five other issues –
Community
College
supporting online/distance education, upgrading ERP systems,
IT staffing, instructional integration, and user support – each
polled about 10 percent of the
votes.
“The absence of a clear
‘single most important issue’
in the 2009 survey suggests that
institutional IT officers are
fighting lots of ‘digital fires’ on
their campuses,” says Green.
The current round of budget
cuts may also be a catalyst for
reorganizing IT units. Almost
two-fifths (38.8 percent) of the
survey respondents report that
their campus has reorganized
Distance/
academic computing in the past
Online
Education
two years. Another fourth (25.2
percent) anticipate the reorgan-
2
ization of academic computing in the
cation regulations on P2P ahead of modiMoreover, the survey numbers on the
next 24 months. Moreover, fully a sixth
fying institutional policies or commiting
coming role of eBook content are fairly
(15.8 percent) of the survey respondents
funds in response to actual or inferred
consistent across all sectors from comfederal mandates. More challenging for
indicate that their campuses reorganized
munity colleges to research universities.
academic computing in the past two years
most institutions will be the HEOA manHowever, the survey respondents appear
and will probably do it again in the next
date “to offer alternatives to illegal downslightly less confident about the role of
two years. The numbers are similar for
loading or peer-to-peer distribution of
eBook platforms: just two-thirds (66.0
administrative computing units: 34.4 perintellectual property” given the demise
percent) agree that dedicated “eBook
over the past year of the few
cent have reorganized, 23.6 percent expect to reorganize, and
commercial music services
Campus Compliance with the P2P
14.8 percent have done it rethat were targeting the higher
Provisions of the HEOA 2008
cently and expect to do it again
education market and offerpercentages, fall 2009
100
very soon.
ing institutional site licenses.
The survey data also reveal
Some campuses have found
80
a little relief from budget cuts in
that the costs of complying the
the federal stimulus funds. ApHEOA mandates on P2P can
60
proximately a third of the surbe significant, averaging
vey respondents from public uni$67,353 for public universi40
ties, $56,795 for private universities, public four-year colleges, and community colleges
versities, $34,308 for public
20
report that “federal stimulus
four-year colleges, $31,671 for
funds will help sustain IT reprivate four-year colleges, and
0
sources at my campus.” How$16,017
for community colALL
Public
Private
Public 4-Yr.
Private 4-Yr.
Community
INSTITUTIONS
Universities
Universities
Colleges
Colleges
Colleges
leges.
ever, their counterparts in the
private sector are less sanguine
The 2009 Campus Comusing technology-based
developed a campus plan to
offering alternatives to illegal
deterrents to stem illegal
combat illegal P2P activity
P2P activity/downloding
about the benefits of stimulus
puting
Report is based on surP2P actiity
money: less than a fifth (18 pervey data provided by senior
cent) of CIOs in private universities and
campus IT officers, typically the CIO,
readers will be important platforms for
CTO, or other senior campus IT official
just 5 percent of IT officers in private
instructional content in five years.”
four-year colleges report any benefit from
representing 500 two- and four-year pubThe 2009 data point to small gains in
stimulus funds. “While the relief is wellic and private colleges and universities
the number of campuses that are in comcomed at many institutions, the shortacross the United States. Survey participliance with the broad terms of the P2P
lived federal stimulus money is not a
pants completed the questionnaire in
provisions of the Higher Education OpOctober 2009.
long-term solution to the challenges conportunity Act (HEOA) of 2008. For
fronting IT budgets and the need to retain
example, more than four-fifths (84.2 perIT personnel,” says Green.
cent) of public universities report that
Copies of the 2009 Campus Computing Report are
Budget cuts notwithstanding, camthey “have developed plans to effecavailable from The Campus Computing Project. Price:
puses continue to invest in notification
tively combat the unauthorized distribu$37.00 plus $2.00 for shipping and handling for a print
tion of copyrighted material,” up from
systems. A new item on the 2009 quescopy. Electronic (PDF) copies and site licenses are
also available. Please contact Campus Computing
tionnaire reveals that more than four80.0 percent in 2008. But beyond the
for additional information.
HEOA mandate for campuses to address
fifths (83.6 percent) of campuses particiillegal P2P activity on campus networks,
pating in the survey contract with commercial firms for campus notification
many institutions may have opted to wait
for the recently announced Dept. of Eduservices, often software and services that
integrate and facilitate concurrent voice,
text, and email messages to students, facTHE CAMPUS COMPUTING PROJECT
ulty, and staff. Yet as noted in last year’s
Begun 1990, The Campus Computing Project is the largest continuing study of the role of computing,
Campus Computing Report, the effeceLearning, and information technology in American higher education. The project’s national studies draw
on qualitative and quantitative data to help inform campus IT leaders, college faculty and administrators,
tiveness of these systems is probably
policy-makers, and others interested in a wide array of information technology planning and policy issues
limited by the fact that most campuses
that affect colleges and universities.
(73.5 percent) have an “opt-in” registraThe 2009 Campus Computing Survey was supported, in part, by the following sponsors: Adobe
tion policy for the notification service,
Systems, Amazon, Apple, Blackboard, Blackboard Connect, Campus Management, The Center for Digital
i.e., students, faculty, and staff must regEducation, Datatel, Dell, Follett Higher Education Group, Google, IBM Higher Education, Jenzabar,
Lenovo, Longsight Group, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Microsoft, Oracle, Pearson Education, Perceptis,
ister for the service.
Presidium Learning, rSmart Group, SAS, SunGard Higher Education, Sonic Foundry, SONY, Touchnet
Campus IT officers seem somewhat
Information Systems, Turnitin, and Verba Software.
bullish on the future of eBooks, accordFor additional information, please contact:
ing to the 2009 survey. Fully three-fourths
THE CAMPUS COMPUTING PROJECT
(76.3 percent) agree/strongly agree that
PO Box 261242 u Encino, CA u 91426-1242 u USA
“eBook content will be an important source
for instructional content in five years.”
TEL: 818.990.2212
u
FAX: 818.784.8008
u
www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
The 19th National Survey of Computing and
Information Technology in US Higher Education
Kenneth C Green
THE CAMPUS COMPUTING PROJECT
www.campuscomputing.net
4 November 2009
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
Project Sponsors
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-1www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
An Accidental Revolution
Unplanned
Unprepared
Unanticipated
WHAT’S CHANGED?
Methodology
500 survey respondents
Web-based data collection
Survey period: late Sept – Oct 2009
79 pct of 2009 campuses participated in
the 2008 survey
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-2www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
2009 Survey Sample
Dept of Ed N
(adjusted)
Survey N
Participation
Rate (pct)
Public Research & Doctoral Universities
168
75
44.6
Private Research & Doctoral Universities
92
44
47.8
Public 4-Year Colleges
(Baccalaureate & Masters)
374
95
25.4
Private 4-Year Colleges
(Baccalaureate & Masters)
824
174
21.1
Associate Degree/
Public Community Colleges
1018
108
10.6
Category
2009 Highlights
•
KEY THEMES: budget cuts and competing priorities
•
Fed Stim $$ provide a little relief for some public
campuses
•
Continuing transition and reorganization of IT units
on many campuses.
•
Budget cuts are back
•
Open Source LMS gaining traction
•
Interesting long-term prospects for eBooks?
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-3www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Single Most Important IT Issue
Trends, 2000-2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Instructional
Integration
(40.5%)
Instructional
Integration
(31.5%)
Instructional
Integration
(24.3%)
Instructional
Integration
(21.4%)
Network &
Data Security
(21.1%)
Network &
Data Security
(30.0%)
Network &
Data Security
(29.5%)
Network &
Data Security
(25.5%)
Network &
Data Security
(20.3%)
User Support
(22.3%)
User Support
(15.4%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(18.9%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(17.6%)
Instructional
Integration
(18.5%)
Instructional
Integration
(17.9%)
Instructional
Integration
(17.3%)
Upgrade//
Replace ERP
(13.0%)
Hiring/
Retaining
IT Staff
(16.7%)
Financing IT
(14.6%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(12.6%)
Financing IT
(15.1%)
Financing IT
(16.1%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(17.2%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(16.1%)
Upgrade/
Replace ERP
(16.3%)
Hiring/
Retaining
IT Staff
(12.3%)
Instructional
Integration
(11.9%)
Single Most Important IT Issue, 2009
There is no “Single Most Important” IT Issue!
Five items each at
10 pct
Distance Ed
ERP Systems
IT Staffing
Instructional Integration
Two items each
at 15 pct
User Support
Financing IT
Network Upgrade/Replacement
All Others (5)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
percentages
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-4www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Why Is Distance Ed Now a Top CIO Priority?
The Official Title of the
Senior Operating Officer for
the Online Program is:
• Rapidly rising
enrollments
President/CEO
• Key role of IT in
operational infrastructure
of online programs
Provost
19%
CIO
45%
Other Assoc/Ass't
VP
Other Assoc VP
14%
Continuing Ed
18%
• CIOs may be the line
managers for online ed
at many campuses!
Provost/CAO
VP/Dean
Continuing Ed
Chief Info Officer
Other Sr. Campus
Officer
Source: MANAGING ONLINE EDUCATION 2009 (WCET/Campus Computing Project)
Reorganizing IT Units, Fall 2009
Organizational structures for many
IT units are in transition.
38 pct have
reorganized
academic
computing
units in the
past two
years
15 percent who
have reorganized
academic
computing expect
to do it again in
the next two
years!.
28 pct expect
to restructure
academic
computing the
next two
years.
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-5www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
IT Security
IT Security Incidents, A/Y 2005 - 2009
percentages by sector
60
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
50
40
30
20
10
0
Computer theft Hack/attack on
Identity
w/confidental
campus
management
data
network
Major Virus Major Spyware Social NetInfestaton
Infestation
working Site
Data Loss on
Distr Server
Employee
Misconduct
IT Security
Student Security Incident Linked to
Social Networking Site Incidents
20
percentages by sector
2006
2007
2008
2009
15
10
5
0
All Institutions
Public
Research
Universities
Private
Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-6www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
IT Security
Intentional Employee Misconduct
Affecting IT Security
16
14
2007
percentages by sector
2008
2009
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
All
Institutions
Public
Research
Universities
Private
Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Strategic Plan for Network Security
100
90
percentage of institutions reporting a strategic plan
for network security, by sector,2002-2009
2002
2009
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-7www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Slow Progress on IT Disaster Recovery
90
percentage of institutions reporting a strategic plan
for IT disaster recovery, by sector, 2002-2009
80
2002
2009
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public
Universities
Private
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Strategic Plans
Cell Phones and Web 2.0
Cell Phones
45
percentages
Web 2.0
40
25
35
30
percentages
20
25
20
15
15
10
10
5
0
Public
Private Public 4-Yr. Private 4-Yr. Community
Universities Universities Colleges
Colleges
Colleges
5
0
2007
2008
Public
Private Public 4-Yr. Private 4-Yr. Community
Universities Universities Colleges Colleges Colleges
2009
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-8www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Web 2.0 Comes to Campus
Campus Wikis and Second Life
Public Campus Wiki
percentages
40
Campus Presence on Second Life
35
percentages
50
30
45
25
40
20
35
15
30
25
10
20
5
15
0
Public
Private Public 4-Yr. Private 4-Yr. Community
Universities Universities Colleges Colleges Colleges
10
5
0
2007
2008
Public
Private Public 4-Yr. Private 4-Yr. Community
Universities Universities Colleges Colleges Colleges
2009
Emergency Notification Services, 2009
100
90
percentages by sector, 2009
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
STRATEGIC
PLAN, Fall
2009
Sirens
Campus
Portal
Email
Text
Messaging
Campus
Phones
Off-Campus
Phones
Cell
Phones
Elements of the plan that are operational as of fall 2009
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Year
Colleges
Private 4-Year
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
-9www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Strategic Plans For Emergency Notification
100
percentages by sector, 2007-2009
2007
90
2008
2009
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
All
Institutions
Public Research
Universities
Private
Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Emergency Notification
Participation Strategy: “Opt-In” (Must Register)
90
percentages by sector, 2008-2009
2008
2009
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 10 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Deploying the Notification System
percentages, fall 2009
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public
University
Private
University
Emergency Notification
Public 4-Yr
College
Student Recruitment
Private 4-Yr
College
Student Services
Community
College
Alumni Contact
Third Party Notification Providers
55
50
45
40
percentages, fall 2009
NO PROVIDER
Blackboard
E2Campus
MIR3
3N/Nat Notification
Rave
OTHER
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr
Colleges
Private 4-Yr
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 11 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Budget Cuts, 2000-2009
70
percentage of institutions reporting budget reductions for academic
computing over prior year funding, 2000 - 2009
2000
2009
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Budgets Trends by IT Function, 2009
50
40
percentage of institutions reporting budget increases or
budget cuts, by IT budget function
Increase
Cut
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Central IT
Services
Academic
Computing
Adm.
Computing
ERP
Software
& Services
Wireless
Networking
IT
Security
Network
Servers
Emergency
Notification
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 12 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Phasing Out Public Computing Labs
100
percentages, fall 2009
21
13
13
10
Public
Universities
Private
Universities
Public 4-Yr
Colleges
Private 4-Yr
Colleges
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Decided Not to
Do This
Reviewing in
2009-10
Beginning in
2009-10
Community
Colleges
Already Doing
This in 2009-10
Federal Stimulus Funds Will Help
Sustain IT Resources at My Campus
40
percentages, fall 2009
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Public
Universities
Private
Universities
Public 4-Yr
Colleges
Private 4-Yr
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 13 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Current Compliance with P2P Provisions of HEOA
100
percentages, by campus type, fall 2009
90
80
developed plans to combat illegal P2P
using technology-based deterrents
change compared to 2008
+4
offering alternatives to illegal P2P
70
+6
60
+7
50
Annual Costs of
HEO Compliance
+5
+1
+5
40
30
+10
+9
20
+6
+5
+1
-10
10
$67k
$57k
$34k
+5
--
$32k
$16k -2
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
The Campus Computing Project
ePortfolios
60
percentages by sector reporting ePortfolio services on the
campus Web site, 2003-2009
2003
2009
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 14 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
eBooks
90
percentage who agree/strongly agree, fall 2009
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public
Univesities
Private
Universities
Public 4-Yr
Colleges
eBooks will be an important source for
instructional resources in five years
Private 4-Yr
Colleges
Community
Colleges
eBook readers will be an important platform
for instructional resources in five years
Campus License for Antiplagarism Software
80
percentages by sector, 2008 vs. 2009
2008
2009
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 15 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Rising Use of IT in Instruction
Learning Management Tools (CMS/LMS)
70
percentage of courses using CMS/LMS by sector, 2000-2009
2000
2009
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
LMS Deployment by Sector, 2009
80
percentages by sector, fall 2009
2009 MANAGING ONLINE ED STUDY
• 47 pct reviewing LMS strategy
• 28 pct plan to change LMS in two years
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public
Universities
Private
Universities
Blackboard
Public 4-Yr
Colleges
Angel
D2L
Private 4-Yr
Colleges
Moodle
Community
Colleges
Sakai
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 16 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Open Source LMS Deployment, 2007-2009
35
percentages by sector using an Open Source LMS (Moodle or Sakai), 2007 - 2009
30
2007
2008
2009
25
20
15
10
5
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Moodle vs. Sakai Deployment, 2009
30
percentages by sector, 2009
Moodle
Sakai
25
20
15
10
5
0
Public Research Private Research
Universities
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 17 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Perspectives on Open Source
Open Source Offers a Viable Alternative for Key
Campus ERP Applications
40
percentages by sector, 2004-2009
2004
2009
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Perspectives on Open Source
Open Source Will Play an Increasingly Important
Role in Our Campus IT Strategy
80
percentages by sector, 2004-2009
2004
70
2009
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 18 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Outsourcing eMail Service Provider
percentages for institutions reporting that they have or are now
converting to outsourced email services, by sector, 2009
80
Google
Microsoft
Zimba
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Wireless Classrooms
80
percentages by sector, 2004-2008
2004
70
2009
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 19 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Campus Projects to Assess the Impact of IT on
Instructional Services and Academic Programs
60
percentages by sector, 2001-2009
2001
2009
50
40
30
20
10
0
Public Research
Universities
Private Research
Universities
Public 4-Yr.
Colleges
Private 4-Yr.
Colleges
Community
Colleges
Some Key IT
Issues
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 20 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
Impact of Budget Cuts
No clear top IT priority in 2009
Compounding consequences of cuts early in
decade, new cuts, plus mid-year cuts.
“Drinking from the fire hose”
Struggling to meet rising expectations and
demand with fewer resources
Rising stress on units and individuals
LMS 3.0
The LMS is higher ed’s version of the
“supermarket scanner”
Transitional period as the LMS migrates from
a resource (content and services) to a source
(data!)
Integration with the ERP
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 21 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
eBooks
No clear, compelling value statement on
eBooks – to date
CIOs seem bullish on content, a little less so
on platforms.
Still very early in the cycle…
– Platform providers focused on consumer market
– Educ providers have yet to deliver a compelling
resource for students (value, features, cost).
Managing Online Education
New project launched by
WCET and The Campus
Computing Project
Focused on the
instructional, organizational,
and IT infrastructure for
online and distance ed.
WCET conference video at:
campuscomputing.net
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 22 www.campuscomputing.net
CAMPUS COMPUTING, 2009
Kenneth C. Green
www.campuscomputing.net
2009 EDUCAUSE Conference
4 November 2009
•
Denver, CO
© Kenneth C. Green, 1990-2009
- 23 www.campuscomputing.net
THE CAMPUS
COMPUTING PROJECT
www.campuscomputing.net
PO Box 261242 Encino, CA 91426-1242 USA
Tel: 818.990.2212 Fax: 818.784.8008
[email protected]
AVAILABLE ON 10 DEC 2009
FAX TO: 818.784.8008XXX
THE 2009 CAMPUS COMPUTING REPORT
Please send me the Campus Computing Reports listed below:
Total
ISSN 1521-1614
The 2009 Campus Computing Report
___ Print Copy: 2009 Campus Computing Report ($37.00 each copy)
___ PDF File: Campus Computing 2009 ($75.00 for one PDF file; max 5 users)
$
___ Site License, Campus Computing 2009 ($150.00 for one PDF file to be
posted on a campus server and restricted to authorized campus users)
Campus Computing Reports 2004-2008
___ copies, Campus Computing 2008 ($35.00 each print copy)
___ copies, Campus Computing 2007 ($35.00 each print copy)
___ copies, Campus Computing 2006 ($30.00 each print copy)
___ copies, Campus Computing 2005 ($30.00 each print copy)
___ copies, Campus Computing 2004 ($30.00 each print copy)
Postage and shipping charges: $2.00 per order for US/Canada (book rate) addresses
and $10.00 per order for overseas airmail delivery
California Sales Tax – for print orders shipped to CA address: 9.75%
BALANCE DUE US $
Payment option:
credit card
Credit Card Information:
institutional/company check
American Express
$
institutional purchase order
MasterCard
Visa
Card Number:
|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|
Exp. Date:
|__|__|__|__|
Security Code: |__|__|__|__|
Name on Card:
Please ship to:
Name:
Title:
Institution/Org:
Address:
City:
Phone:
STATE:
ZIP:
Fax:
e-mail:
Please make checks payable to:
Kenneth C. Green / Campus Computing
PO Box 261242
Encino, CA • 91426-1242 • USA
w1