Leukemic transformation of MPN: Therapy‐related or unrelated? Jean‐Jacques KILADJIAN, MD, PhD Clinical Investigations Center Saint‐Louis Hospital ‐ Paris Diderot University Leukemic transformation: a long term issue Passamonti, Haematologica, 2003 1 Registry data 2 Registry data 292 AML/MDS 11 039 MPN ‐ 14 (5%) 14 (5%) unclear Dg or prior Chemo/Radio 278 ‐ 51 (17%) AML/MDS lack of information 227 ‐ 65 (22%) AML/MDS no matched control 162 AML/MDS cases (55%) Registry data Median follow‐up? Median follow up? 3 Registry data Median follow‐up? Median follow up? 4 Therapy‐related MDS/AML Sterkers et al, Blood. 1998;91(2):616‐22. Therapy‐related MDS/AML Berk et al, Semin Hematol. 1986;23:132‐143 5 Therapy‐related MDS/AML Finazzi et al, Blood. 2005, 105(7):2664‐70 Therapy‐related MDS/AML • ECLAP median F‐U: 2.8 years Finazzi et al, Blood. 2005, 105(7):2664‐70 6 Therapy‐related MDS/AML • ECLAP median F‐U: 2.8 years Finazzi et al, Blood. 2005, 105(7):2664‐70 • 2 drugs approved for the treatment of PV: g pp • HU and pipobroman • Their leukemogenic potential when used as single agent is debated • Long term prospective studies to assess their impact on outcome of PV 7 • Phase 2 study of pipobroman • 164 PV patients analyzed for very long‐term outcomes, median follow‐up 12 years • 32 leukemic events • Actuarial risk: • 14% at 10 years • 19% at 15 years LEUKEMIC EVENTS MDS/AL ‐ risk factors Added / switched drug P = 0.65 Age at diagnosis P = 0.96 Hematocrit 60% P = 0.54 Platelet count 400.109/l P = 0.35 Splenomegaly P = 0.64 WBC 10.109/l P = 0.032 8 p= 0.032 LEUKEMIC EVENTS Cytogenetics Available in 10 cases : in 10 cases : del(7q), del(20q) ‐7 complex, ‐7, +8, ‐17, t(4;10) +8 del(5q),+8, dic(17)t(16;17) ‐9 9, ‐13 13, +3mar +3mar add(6q), +14 complex, del(17p), t(1;22) complex normal > 3 anomalies n=3 -7, del(7q) n=3 17p deletion n=3 +8 n=3 del(5q) n=1 del(20q) n=1 t(1;22) n=1 9 Long‐term evolution • Causes of death: • ECLAP study • median F‐U: 2.8 yrs Causes of Deaths (n= 164) Cardio‐vascular 45% Cancer 19% Hematological transformation 13% Marchioli et al, J Clin Oncol, 2005; 23(10):2224-32. Median follow-up: 11.4 years Causes of deaths All patients n = 89 Leukemic events 26 (29%) Vascular events 19 (21%) Solid tumors 13 (15%) Unrelated 16 (18%) Unknown 15 (17%) 10 Median follow-up: 11.4 years < 60 years 60 years All patients n = 35 n = 54 n = 89 18 (51%) 8 (15%) 26 (29%) Vascular events 2 (6%) 17 (31%) 19 (21%) Solid tumors 5 (14%) 8 (15%) 13 (15%) Unrelated 8 (23%) 8 (15%) 16 (18%) Unknown 2 (6%) 13 (24%) 15 (17%) Causes of deaths Leukemic events Analyses in 1997 Median FU: 9 years 13 leukemic events • 9 AL • 4 MDS Incidence: 10% at 13 years 11 Median FU: 16 3 years Median FU: 16.3 years Analyses in 1997 Median FU: 9 years 13 leukemic events • 9 AL • 4 MDS Incidence: 10% at 13 years • Median overall survival: 17 years (95% CI: 15.4 ‐ 19.4) • SMR: 1.84 (95% CI: 1.5 ‐ 2.2) 12 • Median overall survival: 17 years (95% CI: 15.4 ‐ 19.4) • HU: 20.3 years • Pipobroman: 15.4 years • Median overall survival: 17 years (95% CI: 15.4 ‐ 19.4) • Causes of deaths (n=95): MDS/AML: 54% Vascular event: 19% Solid tumor: 12% ECLAP ‐ Causes of Deaths Cardio‐vascular 45% Cancer 19% Hematological transformation 13% 13 • Evolution to AML/MDS 10 years 15 years 20 years Total cohort 9.8% 24% 34% HU (ITT) 6.6% 16.5% 24% Pipo (ITT) 13% 34% 52% • Evolution to AML/MDS 10 years 15 years 20 years Total cohort 9.8% 24% 34% HU (ITT) 6.6% 16.5% 24% Pipo (ITT) 13% 34% 52% HU (PP) 7.5% 14% 22% Pipo p (PP) ( ) 12% 37% 56% 14 • Evolution to AML/MDS 10 years 15 years 20 years Total cohort 9.8% 24% 34% HU (ITT) 6.6% 16.5% 24% Pipo (ITT) 13% 34% 52% HU (PP) 7.5% 14% 22% Pipo p ((PP)) 12% 37% 56% HU (alone, n=94) 7.3% 11% 17% Pipo (alone, n=130) 14.6% 34% 49.4% Multicenter observational study in ET 108 newly diagnosed consecutive ET patients S Started in 1979 d i 1979 HU only as first line therapy Median follow‐up: 22.3 years Cumulative incidence of AL/MDS: • 12% at 10 years 12% at 10 years • 15% at 15 years • 20% at 20 years Kiladjian, ASH, 2008 15 Multicenter observational study in ET 1.0 Leukemic evolution: predictive factors WBC 0.8 <7275 >11150 0.2 0.4 0.6 Leukocytosis: p=0.018 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Years Summary ‐ Hematological transformation with “conventional” drugs At 15 years HU Pipobroman PV 16% 19% (Phase 2) 30% (Phase 3) ET 15% Is hydroxyurea leukemogenic? 16 Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease HU approved in the USA for the treatment of adults with SCD Included RCTs, observational studies, case reports Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease Darbari et al., 17 Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease SCD is not a neoplastic disease Predisposition Case‐control study in ET and PV 64 AML cases vs 358 without progression Median FU: 8.6 years 5 SNPs in 4 DNA repair genes (XPD, XPG, XPC, XRCC1) 18 Predisposition Predisposition 19 Conclusions • Evolution to leukemia could be the first cause of deaths in the long‐term in properly managed MPN patients • Evolution to leukemia is part of the natural history of MPN, but this risk can clearly be enhanced by medicines like alkylating agents • Pipobroman is clearly leukemogenic is clearly leukemogenic and should not be used as and should not be used as first line therapy Conclusions • Hydroxyurea has never been shown to increase the risk of leukemic evolution • The higher than previously reported incidence of evolution to leukemia in HU‐treated PV patients we found in the randomized trial could be due to natural disease evolution not altered by HU therapy • However, clearly non‐leukemogenic drugs should be favored to treat patients <60 years 20 Acknowledgements B. Cassinat B. Cassinat C. Chomienne F. Delhommeau W. Vainchenker S. Chevret S. Chevret J.D. Rain L. Knoops L. Aljassem S. Bellucci N. Cambier Y. Chait J.L. Dutel K. Ghomari N. Parquet M. Roussel P. Rousselot P Turlure P. Turlure J.M. Zini 21
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz